研究生: |
馬靖 Ma, Jing |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
多螢與跨螢情境影響廣告效果之研究——以微電影廣告為例 A Study on The Influences of Advertisement on Multi-Screen and Cross-Screen Context: A Case Study of Micro Film Advertising |
指導教授: |
林慧斐
Lin, Hui-Fei |
口試委員: |
林慧斐
Lin, Hui-Fei 蔣旭政 Chiang, Hsu-Cheng 蔡欣怡 Tsai, Hsin-Yi |
口試日期: | 2021/06/10 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
大眾傳播研究所 Graduate Institute of Mass Communication |
論文出版年: | 2021 |
畢業學年度: | 109 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 110 |
中文關鍵詞: | 多螢情境 、跨螢情境 、微電影廣告 、廣告置入 、故事行銷 、說服知識模型 、轉移理論 、消費者行為 |
英文關鍵詞: | multi-screen context, cross-screen context, microfilm advertising, advertising placement, storytelling marketing, transportation theory, persuasion knowledge model, consumer behavior |
研究方法: | 實驗設計法 |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202101679 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:161 下載:24 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
隨著行動載具等不同螢幕的裝置出現,消費者使用與觀看廣告的習慣已逐漸改變,除了多螢使用的概念之外,更發展出「跨螢」的使用者行為。且廣告形式日新月異,相較於過去單向的廣告形式,雙向互動的多媒體廣告儼然是新時代下較具趨勢的型態。因此本研究以微電影廣告為例,探討在多螢與跨螢的使用行為以及時間、置入方式之下,是否影響微電影廣告的效果。
本研究採2(時間長度:長VS短)× 2(置入方式:顯著VS隱約)× 2(使用者行為:多螢VS跨螢)的組間實驗,探討載具轉換後微電影廣告的轉變,以及針對廣告商與品牌商,如何提升產品置入的效果。本研究欲結合螢幕轉換的行為,以及在微電影廣告的故事行銷概念,加以分析與探討。並由以上自變項(時間長度、置入方式、使用者行為)探討上述變項對使用者觀看微電影廣告後,與依變項(品牌態度、廣告態度、品牌回憶、購買意願)之間的交互作用與影響
研究結果顯示,(1)長微電影相較於短微電影廣告對廣告效果有顯著較佳的影響;(2)跨螢相較於多螢情境對廣告態度、品牌態度、購買意願有顯著較佳的影響;(3)顯著相較於隱約置入對廣告態度、品牌態度、購買意願有顯著較佳的影響;(4)長微電影廣告搭配跨螢情境對廣告態度、品牌態度有顯著交互作用效果;(5)微電影廣告時間長度與置入方式對廣告效果的交互作用無顯著影響;(6)跨螢情境搭配顯著置入對品牌態度、購買意願有顯著交互作用效果;(7)跨螢情境搭配顯著置入對品牌態度、購買意願有顯著交互作用效果。本研究結果顯示多螢與跨螢情境對微電影廣告之影響,可作為日後制定微電影廣告行銷策略之參考。
With the emergence of mobile carriers and other devices with different screens, consumers' habits of using and watching advertisements have gradually changed, and in addition to the concept of multi-screen use, "cross-screen" user behavior has also been developed. In addition to the concept of multi-screen use, "cross-screen" user behavior has also been developed. Compared with the one-way advertising format in the past, two-way interactive multimedia advertising has become a more trendy format in the new era. Therefore, this study uses microfilm advertising as an example to investigate whether the effects of microfilm advertising are influenced by multi-screen and cross-screen user behaviors, as well as time and placement methods.
A two (length of time: long vs. short ) x two (placement method: prominent placement vs. subtle placement) x two (user behavior: multi-screen vs. cross-screen) between-subject design was conducted to test the changes in microfilm advertising after the change of carriers and how to improve the effectiveness of product placement for advertisers and brands. This study is intended to analyze and investigate the screen switching behavior and the storytelling marketing concept in microfilm advertising. The interaction between these variables and the dependent variables (brand attitude, advertising attitude, brand recall, and purchase intention) after viewing the microfilm ad was investigated by the above-mentioned independent variables (length of time, placement, and user behavior)
The results of the study showed that (1) long microfilm ads have a significantly better impact on advertising effectiveness than short microfilm ads; (2) cross-screen has a significantly better impact on advertising attitude, brand attitude, and purchase intention than multi-screen; (3) prominent placement has a significantly better impact on advertising attitude, brand attitude, and purchase intention than subtle placement; (4) long microfilm advertisements with cross-screen context had a significant interaction effect on advertising attitude and brand attitude; and (5) there was no significant effect of the length of microfilm advertisement and placement method on the interaction effect of advertisement effect; (6) there was a significant interaction effect of cross-screen context with significant placement on brand attitude and purchase intention; (7) there was a significant interaction effect of cross-screen context with prominent placement on brand attitude and purchase intention. The results of this study show that the effects of multi-screen and cross-screen contexts on microfilm advertising can be used as a reference for future microfilm advertising marketing strategies.
一、中文部分
Appier(2016)。Appier台灣電子商務跨螢使用行為報告【官方網站】。取自:https://www.appier.com/zh-hant/reports/?category=taiwan-zh-hant&years=2016
王君(2012)。淺析“微時代”環境下的電影廣告——微電影廣告淺析。中國電影市場,3。
白靖利、盧和萍(2012)。微電影廣告的營銷。現代廣告。中國核心期刊,5 (下) ,69-71。
申雪鳳、譚江(2011)。傳播學視野下的影視劇植入性廣告現象分析。中國電影市場,7。
林家如(2015)。微電影之故事行銷分析-以台北市政府微電影為例。復興崗學報,106,177-199。
周萍(2013)。微電影廣告傳播價值淺析。藝術科技,5。
胡一萱、陳清儒(2012)。微電影的話題營銷價值分析。今傳媒,2,69-70。
周璐(2007)。市場化電影媒體的廣告運作初探。消費導刊,8。
姚建惠(2012)。微電影廣告的價值分析。新聞傳播,9,17-18。
袁方琴(2014)。品牌形象類微電影廣告的文本解讀。電影理論,20,120-122。
黃光玉(2006)。說故事打造品牌:一個分析的架構。廣告學研究,26,1-23。
黃聖哲(2002),從產品知識與說服知識的差異,探討比較式手法對閱聽人廣告態度的影響—一個中介效果模式的驗證。碩士論文,國立政治大學,台北市。
陳瑾(2011)。影視廣告創意新寵——電影廣告。現代視聽,6。
動腦雜誌.(2014). 多螢跨屏進行式,網路+行動1+1>2【官方網站】。取自:https://www.brain.com.tw/news/articlecontent?ID=20985
張鴻(2012)。說故事的商機微電影行銷 觸動你心。貿易雜誌,252。
康初瑩(2011)。微傳播時代的微電影營銷模式解讀。新聞界,7,75-77。
楊華源(2017)。淺析微電影廣告的傳播效果。西部廣播電視,22。
劉柳(2017)。微時代下微電影廣告的發展對策。電視指南,22。
趙玉娟、張慈祐(2014)。我喜歡看廣告:以說服知識探討品牌娛樂化之廣告效果。中華傳播學會,年會論文。
邊禕明、韓亞飛(2011)。電影廣告發展探析。新聞世界,4。
藍宇眉(2004),記憶方法、重複、教育程度與辨識能力對品牌記憶之影響。碩士論文,國立中央大學,桃園市。
二、英文部分
Alperstein, N. M. (2005). Living in an age of distraction: Multitasking and simultaneous media use and the implications for advertisers. (Research report). Loyola College in Maryland.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1975). A bayesian analysis of attribution processes. Psychological Bulletin, 82(2), 261–277.
Ardley & Barry. (2006). Telling stories about strategies: A narratological approach to marketing planning. The Marketing Review, 6(3), 197-210.
Arch G.,Suresh S.& Kenneth E. (2008). When consumers and brands talk: Storytelling theory and research in psychology and marketing. Psychology and Marketing, 25(2), 97-145.
Aydınoğlu, N. Z., & Cian, L. (2014). Show me the product, show me the model: Effect of picture type on attitudes toward advertising. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(4), 506-519.
Balasubramanian, S. K. (1994). Beyond advertising and publicity: Hybrid messages and public policy issues. Journal of Advertising, 23(4), 29-46.
Balasubramanian, Siva K., James A. Karrh, and Hermant Patwardhan. (2006). Audience response to product placements. Journal of Advertising, 35 , 115-141.
Baker, Michael J. and Churchill, Gilbert A. Jr. (1977). The impact of physically attractive models on advertising evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 14 ,538–555.
Bagozzi and Robert E. Burnkrant. (1979). Attitude organization and the attitude-behavior relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 913–929.
Bagozzi, R., & Burnkrant, R. (1979). Attitude organization and the attitude–behavior relationship. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 37(6), 913-929.
Bart, Y., Stephen, A. T., & Sarvary, M. (2014). Which products are best suited to mMobile advertising? A field study of mobile display advertising effects on consumer attitudes and intentions. Journal of Marketing Research, 51(3), 270-285.
Belch, G. E., &; Michael, A. B. (1999). Advertising and promotion: An integrate marketing communications perspective. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Becker, Mark W., Reem Alzahabi, and Christopher J. Hopwood. (2013). Media multitasking is associatedwith symptoms of depression and social anxiety. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16 (2) 132-35.
BIGresearch. (2003). NEWS-BIGresearch Releases: newest findings from latest simultaneous media usage survey.
Bhatnagar, N., Aksoy, L., & Malkoc, S. (2002). Efficacy of brand placements versus advertisements: The impact of brand familiarity and media credibility on attitude towards brand claims, trust in brand sponsors and trust in the communication medium. Paper presented at meeting of the Advertising and Consumer Psychology Conference, New York.
Bruner, G. C. (1998). Standardization & justification: Do aad scales measure up? Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 20(1), 1-18.
Burke, Raymond R. , and Srull, Thomas K. (1988). Competitive interference and consumer memory for advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 55–68.
Caroline, P. (2006). The art of storytelling: how loyalty marketers can build emotional connections to their brands. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23(7), 382-384.
Cline, T. W., & Kellaris, J. J. (2007). The influence of humor strength and humor-message relatedness on ad memorability. Journal of Advertising, 36(1), 55–67.
Cowley, E., & Barron, C. (2008). When product placement goes wrong: The effects of program liking and placement prominence. Journal of Advertising, 37(1), 89–98.
Cross-Screen Engagement, Microsoft, Flamingo, and Ipsos OTX, 2013.
D'heer, E., Courtois, C., & Paulussen, S. (2012). Everyday life in (front of) the screen: the consumption of multiple screen technologies in the living room context.
In Proceedings of the 10th European conference on Interactive tv and video , 195-198.
d’Astous, A. and Séguin, N. (1999). Consumer reactions to product placement strategies in television sponsorship. European Journal of Marketing,33(9), 896-910.
Dodds, William B. , Monroe, Kent B. , and Grewal, Dhruv. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers’ product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28, 307–19.
Fitch, S. (2009). Product placement and the effects of persuasion knowledge. Honors Projects in Marketing, 4, 1-18.
Francisco Vega, José Medina, Daniel Mendoza, Víctor Saquicela, Mauricio Espinoza. (2017). A robust video identification framework using perceptual image hashing. Computer Conference (CLEI) 2017 XLIII Latin American, 1-10.
Fog,K., Budtz,C., & Yakaboylu,B. (2005). Storytelling: Branding in practice, berling: springer.
Foehr, U. (2006). Media multitasking among american youth: Prevalence, predictors, and pairings. Menlo Park, CA: Henry J. Kaiser Foundation.
Friestad, Marian , and Wright, Peter. (1994). The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research, 21 (1), 1–31.
Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 701–721.
Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2002). In the mind’s eye. Transportation-imagery model of narrative persuasion. In M.C.
Green, M. C., Brock, T. C., & Kaufman, G. F. (2004). Understanding media enjoyment: The role of transportation into narrative worlds. Communication Theory, 14, 311–327.
Gupta, P. B., & Lord, K. R. (1998). Product placement in movies: The effect of prominence and mode on audience recall. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 20(1): 47-59.
Hudson, S. and Ritchie, B. (2006). Promoting destinations via film tourism: An empirical identification of supporting marketing initiatives. Journal of Travel Research, 44(4), 387–396.
Jennifer Edson Escalas. (2007). Self-Referencing and persuasion: Narrative transportation versus analytical elaboration. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(4), 421–429.
J. Klein, J. Freeman, D. Harding, and A. Teffahi. (2014) . Assessing the impact of second screen. Technologia in association with DTG and i2 media research, Tech. Rep.
Karrh, J. A. (1998). Brand placement: A review. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 20(2), 31-49.
Keller, K. L. (1998). Strategic brand management. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Kerlinger, F.N; & Lee, H.B. (2000). Foundations of Behavioral Research. (4th edition) United States: Wadsworth, Thomson Learning.
Kirsch, C. (2004). Film and collective storytelling in corporate identity: a casestudy. Corporate communication, 9(3), 225-230.
Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2009). Marketing management (13th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Lankford, S.V. , and D.R. Howard. (1994). Developing a tourism impact attitude scale. Annals of Tourism Research, 21 (1), 121-39.
Lee, A. Y., & Aaker, J. L. (2004). Bringing the frame into focus: The influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86 , 205–218.
Lee, J., Park, D.-H., & Han, I. (2008). The effect of negative online consumer reviews on product attitude: An information processing view. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 7(3), 341-352.
Lutz, Richard J., Mackenzie, Scott B. and Belch, George E. (1983). Attitude toward the ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness. In Advances in Consumer Research, 10, 532–9.
MacKenzie, Scott B., Richard J. Lutz, and George E. Belch. (1986). The role of attitude toward the ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: A Test of Competing Explanations. Journal of Marketing Research, 23, 130–143.
Martensen, A., Grønholdt, L., Bendtsen, L., & Jensen, M. J. (2007). Application of a model for the effectiveness of event marketing. Journal of Advertising Research, 47(3), 283.
Mckee, R. (2003). Storytelling that moves people. Harvard Business Review, 81(6), 51-55.
Moonhee Yang, David R. Roskos-Ewoldsen. (2007) The effectiveness of brand placements in the movies: Levels of placements, explicit and implicit memory, and brand-choice behavior. Journal of Communication, 57(3), 469-489.
Moore, J. J., & Rodgers, L. R. (2005). An examination of advertising credibility and skepticism in five different media using the persuasion knowledge model. American Academy of Advertising Conference Proceedings, 1, 10.
Murphy, R.O., K.A. Ackermann, and M.J.J. Handgraaf. (2011). Measuring social value orientation. Judgment and Decision Making, 6 (8), 771–781.
Nelson, M. R. (2002). Recall of brand placements in computer/video games. Journal of Advertising Research, 42 (2), 80-92.
Nelson, M. R., Keum, H., & Yaros, R. A. (2004). Advertainment or adcreep game players’ attitudes toward advertising and product placements in computer games. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 5(1), 3-21.
Norris, Claire E. and Colman, Andrew M. (1994). Effects of entertainment and enjoyment of television programs on perception and memory of advertisements. Social Behavior and Personality, 22(4), 365–376.
Raney, A. A. (2002). Moral judgment as a predictor of enjoyment of crime drama. Media Psychology, 4, 305–322.
Russell. (1998). Toward a Framework of Product Placement: Theoretical Propositions, in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 25, eds. Joseph W. Alba & J. Wesley Hutchinson, Provo, UT : Association for Consumer Research, 357-362.
Russell, C. A. (2002). Investigating the effectiveness of product placement in television Shows: The role of modality and connection congruence on brand memory and attitude. Journal of Consumer Research, 29, 306-316.
Rooksby, J., Rost, M., Morrison, A., Bell, M., Chalmers, M., and Smith, T. (2014). Practices of parallel media: Using mobile devices when watching television. In CSCW – Designing with Users for Domestic Environments: Methods, Challenges and Lessons Learned, ACM.
Rosen, L. D., Carrier, L. M., & Cheever, N. A. (2013). Facebook and texting made me do it: Media-induced task switching while studying. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 948-958.
Schultz, Don E. and Joseph J. Pilotta. (2004). A New Approach to Understanding. How Media Advertising Works, ESOMAR/ARF, Geneva.
Schultz, D. E., & Pilotta, J. J. (2004). Developing the foundation for a new approach to understanding how media advertising works. Research Paper. Worldwide Audience Measurement 2004 – Cross Media. ESOMAR.
Schultz, D. E. (2006). Media synergy: The next frontier in a multimedia marketplace. Journal of Direct, Data and Digital Marketing Practice, 8(1), 13-29.
Schultz, D. E., Pilotta, J. J., & Block, M. P. (2006). Media consumption and consumer purchasing. Research Paper. Worldwide Multi Media Measurement 2006. ESOMAR.
Segijn, C. M., Voorveld, H. A. M., & Smit, E. G. (2016). The underlying mechanismsof multiscreening effects. Journal of Advertising, 45(4), 391–402.
Shapiro, M. (1993). Product Placements in Motion Pictures. Working Paper, North Western University, NY.
Shamdasani, P. N., Stanaland, A. J. S., & Tan, J. (2001). Location, location, location: Insights for advertising placement on the web. Journal of Advertising Research, 41(4), 7.
Stiger, T. R., Kosinski, A. S., Barnhart, H. X., & Kleinbaum, D. G. (1998). ANOVA forrepeated ordinal data with small sample size? A comparison of ANOVA, MANOVA, WLS and GEE methods by simulation. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 27 (2), 357-375.
Steortz, E. M. (1987). The cost efficiency and communication effects associated with brand name exposure within motion pictures. Doctoral dissertation, West Virginia University.
Stapel, J. (1998). Recall and recognition: A very close relationship. Journal of Advertising Research, 38(4), 41-45.
Spears, N., and S.N. Singh. (2004). Measuring attitude toward the brand and purchase intentions. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 26(2), 53–66.
Thomas, V. L., & Fowler, K. (2016). Examining the impact of brand transgressions on consumers' perceptions of celebrity endorsers. Journal of Advertising, 45(4), 377-390.
Tsang, M. M., Ho, S.-C., & Liang, T.-P. (2004). Consumer attitudes toward mobile advertising: An empirical study. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 8(3), 65-78.
Vincent,L. (2002). Legendary brands: Unleashing the power of storytelling to create a winning marketing strategy , Chicago: Dearborn.
Wakefield MA, Durkin S, Spittal MJ, et al. (2008). Impact of tobacco control policies and mass media campaigns on monthly adult smoking prevalence. Am J Public Health. 98(8), 1443-1450.
Warlop, L. , S. Ratneshwar , and S. M. J. van Osselaer . (2005). Distinctive brand cues and memory for product consumption experiences. International Journal of Research in Marketing 22 (1), 27-44.
Wimmer, R. D., & Dominick, J. R. (1997). Mass media research. Calif: Wadsworth. Pub.