簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 王鈺棠
論文名稱: 科學概念認知結構探索
指導教授: 陳文典
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 物理學系
Department of Physics
論文出版年: 2006
畢業學年度: 94
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 220
中文關鍵詞: 認知結構學習成就科學概念概念結構溫度
英文關鍵詞: cognitive structure, learning achievement, scientific concept, conceptual structure, heat, temperature
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:215下載:24
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探索學生科學概念的認知結構與其運用能力的關係。關於認知結構,利用本研究發展之「熱現象的觀察與解釋」問題卷為工具,以概念的廣博度、精確度和概念組成結構等三個觀測量來探討「認知結構」與「學習成就」之間的關係。研究結果發現,此三個觀測量所表現之「認知結構」與學生「學習成就」有著密切的關係,其中特別是「概念組成結構」一項更是「學習成就」高低的關鍵,此一事實適足以提醒吾人教學最重要的關鍵在於使我們能建構高階概念之「組成結構」。而教師在企圖瞭解學生的學習成效時,也應注意此「組成結構」是否已建夠良好。

    The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between the students’ cognitive structure of scientific concepts and the ability of application of their cognitive structure. The researcher applies the three variables—extent, precision, and structure and use the questionnaire designed for this research —“The Observation and Explication of Thermal Phenomenon” in the investigation of the relationship between the cognitive structure and their learning achievement. The analyzed result of this research indicates that there is a correlation between the cognitive structure presented through the three variables and the learning achievement of the students. Furthermore, the research shows that the “structure” plays the critical role in the students’ learning achievement. Through this research, we learn that what matters in teaching is to assist the students in constructing the “structure” of higher level concepts. Teachers should pay attention to the construction of structure in students in their attempt to understand their students learning.

    致謝 ……………………...………………………………………................... i 中文摘要 ……………………...………………………...……………........... iii 英文摘要 ………………………………………………...………….…….… iv 目次 ................................................................................................................. v 表次 ………………………………………...…..………………………….. viii 圖次 ………………………………...……………………...………………… x 第一章 緒論 ………………………………………….………………. 1 第一節 研究動機與背景 ……………...…………………..………… .. 1 第二節 研究目的與待答問題 ………………………………………… 5 第三節 名詞解釋 ……………………………………………………… 6 第二章 文獻探討 …………………………………………………… 9 第一節 認知結構 …………………………………………………….. 10 一、認知結構的組成成分 ……………………………………….. 13 二、認知結構的組織關係 ……………………………………….. 32 三、認知結構的觀察維度 ……………………………………….. 50 四、小結 ………………………………………………………….. 66 第二節 認知結構的探測 …………………………………………….. 67 一、探測認知結構的步驟 ……………………………………….. 68 二、探測認知結構的方法 ……………………………………….. 71 三、認知結構的觀察維度 ….……………………………………. 80 四、小結 .…………………………………………………………. 89 第三章 研究方法與工具 ………………………………………… 91 第一節 研究流程 …………………………………………………….. 92 第二節 研究對象與限制 …………………………………………….. 93 第三節 研究工具設計 ……………………………………………….. 95 一、工具內容介紹 ………………………………………………. 95 二、工具之效化與信度分析 …………………………………… 111 第四章 資料整理與分析 ……………………………………….. 115 一、段考成績說明 ……………………………………………... 116 二、「諸觀測量」資料整理與分析 …………………………….. 117 第五章 結果與討論 ……………………………………………… 131 一、「諸觀測量」與「熱學段考成績」之關係 …….…………… 131 二、「諸觀測量」與「綜合運用能力」之關係 ……….……… 132 三、學生在三個觀測量上的表現與作答情況 ……….……….. 134 四、「諸觀測量」之整體比較 …………………….…………… 136 五、極端表現學生之分析 ……………………………………... 139 六、其它 ………………………………………………………... 140 第六章 結論與建議 ……………………………………………… 141 第一節 結論 …………………………………………………………. 141 一、「諸觀測量」可反映出學習者的「認知結構」 …….….... 141 二、「認知結構」的探索有助於學生對於科學概念的學習 .… 142 三、學習科學概念著重「解決問題」的效率 …………….….. 143 第二節 建議 ……………………………………………………….... 145 一、科學教育上的建議 ……………………………………….. 145 二、針對本研究之建議 ……………………………………….. 146 參考文獻 ………………………..………………………………………. 149 中文部分………………………………………………………………. 149 英文部分………………………………………………………….…… 150 附錄 …...……………………….…………………………………………. 155 附錄A科學概念與生活事物之「結構基模」類比範例 ………….. 155 附錄B「熱現象的觀察與解釋」題目卷 …………………………… 161 附錄C「熱現象的觀察與解釋」題目卷之評分標準 ……………… 175 附錄D「熱現象的觀察與解釋」題目卷之作答實錄與評分範例 … 187 附錄E學生在三個觀測量上的作答與得分數據 ……..…….……… 203 附錄F 研究對象高一基礎物理「段考成績」 ……………………… 218

    中文部分
    Ashcraft, M. H.著,陳學志主譯(2004)。認知心理學。台北市:學富。
    Massey, G. J.著,何秀煌譯(1972)。符號邏輯導論。台北市:三民。
    Pollock, J. L.原著,劉福增譯述(1971)。符號邏輯導引。台北市:牧童。
    王明泉(1999)。概念形成學習策略在特殊教育上之應用分析。課程與教學,2卷,2期,
    115-129頁。
    王甦、汪安聖(2004)。認知心理學。台北市:五南。
    余民寧(1997)。有意義的學習:概念構圖之研究。台北市:商鼎文化。
    余健治(1998)。各級教科書中有關熱、熱量與熱能的定義與用法。科學教育月刊,213,32-35。
    宋德忠、林世華、陳淑芬、張國恩(1998)。知識結構的測量:路徑搜尋法與概念構圖法的比較。教育心理學報,30卷,2期,123-142頁。
    邱美虹(2000)。概念改變研究的省思與啟示。科學教育學刊,8(1),1-34。
    南一書局(1999)。基礎物理。台北市,南一書局。
    康熙圖書(1999)。基礎物理。台中市,康熙圖書股份有限公司。
    張春興(1994)。教育心理學。台北市:台灣東華。
    許榮富(1990)。從科學知識結構觀點探討物理教學。中等教育,41(4),4-12。
    郭重吉(1988)。從認知觀點探討自然科學的學習。教育學院學報,13,351-363。
    郭重吉(1989)。從認知的觀點探討科學教育的理論與實際。認知與學習基礎研究,第三次研討會。
    郭重吉(1990)。學生科學知識認知結構的評估與描述。彰化師範大學學報,1,279-320。
    陳文典(2004)。自然與生活科技學習領域─主題式教學活動設計。教育部暨台灣師範大學編印。
    彭聃齡、張必隱(1999)。認知心理學。台北市:臺灣東華。
    黃台珠(1984)。概念的研究及其意義。科學教育月刊,66,44-56。
    黃福坤(2002)。物理教學的省思,台灣師大物理系‧物理教學/示範實驗教室。討論區首頁http://www.phy.ntnu.edu.tw/demolab/phpBB/index.php。
    楊士毅(1990)。語言‧演繹邏輯‧哲學─兼論在宗教與社會的應用。台北市:書林。
    葛本儀(2002)主編。語言學概論。台北市:五南。
    潘音利(1982)。如何提高學生對物理的學習興趣及學業成績。科學教育月刊,54,14-29。
    鄭昭明(1993)。認知心理學。台北市:桂冠。
    謝秀月(1995)。師院非數理系學生熱與溫度概念架構之探討。臺南師院學報,28,479-507。
    鍾聖校(1990)。認知心理學。台北市:心理。

    英文部分
    Acton, W. H., Johnson, P. J., & Goldsmith, T. E. (1994). Structure Knowledge assessment: Comparison of referent structures. Journal pf Educational Psychology, 86, 303-311.
    Anderson, J. R. & Bower, G.H. (1973). Human associative memory. Washington, D. C.: Winston.
    Anderson, J. R. (1976). Learning, memory, and thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate.
    Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.
    Anderson, J. R. (1985). Cognitive psychology and its implication (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Freeman.
    Andersson, B. (1980). Some aspects of children’s understanding of boiling point. in W.F.
    Archenhold et al.(Eds.), Cognitive Development Research in Science and Mathematics. pp.252-259.
    Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K.W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 2, pp. 89-185). New York: Academic Press.
    Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
    Ausubel, D. P., Novak, J. D. and Hanesian, H. (1978). Educational Psychology: A cognitive View. 2nd Ed. New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.
    Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. New York: Norton.
    Bruner, J. S., Goodnow, J.J., & Austin, G. A. (1956). A study of thinking. New York: Wiley.
    Bruning, R., Schraw, G., Ronning, R. Glover, J. A. (1999). Cognitive Psychology and Instruction(3rd Ed.). Englewood Gliffs, N. J.: Prentice Hall.
    Champagne, A. B., Gunstone, R. D. and Klopfer, L. E. (1985). Effecting Change in Cognitive Structure Amongst Physics Students. In L. H. T. West, and A. L. Pines. (Eds.), Cognitive Structure and Conceptual Change. Orlando: Academic Press.
    Chi, M. T. (1992). Conceptual change within and across ontological categories: Implications for learning and discovery in science. In R. Giere (Ed.), Cognitive models of science: Minnesota studies in philosophy of science(pp. 129-186). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407-428.
    Collins, A. M., & Quillian, M. R. (1969). Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 240-247.
    Erickson, Gaalen L. (1979). Children’s Conceptions of Heat and Temperature. Science Education, 63(2):221-230.
    Erickson, Gaalen L. (1980). Children’s Viewpoints of Heat: A Second look. Science Education, 64(3):323-336.
    Gagne, R. M., White, R. T. (1984). Memory Structure and Learning Outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 48(2), 187-222.
    Glass, A. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1986). Cognition (2nd ed.). New York: Random House.
    Jonassen, D. H., Beissner, K., & Yacci, M. (1993). Structural knowledge: Techniques for representing conveying, and acquiring structural knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Kintsch, W. (1974). The representation of meaning in memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Labov, W. (1973). The boundaries of words and their meanings. In Charles-James N. Bailey & Roger W. Shuy (Eds.). New ways of analyzing variation in English. Washington, D. C.: Georgetown University Press.
    Linn, M. C. (1987). Establishing a Research Base for Science Education: Challenges, Trends, and Recommendations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(3), 191-216.
    Mayer, D. E. (1970). On the representation and retrieval of stored semantic information. Cognitive Psychology, 1, 242-300.
    Moates, D. R., & Schumacher, G. M. (1980). An Introduction to cognitive psychology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
    Morton, J. & Bekerian, D. (1986). The ways of look at memory. In N.E. Sharkey (Ed.), Advances in Cognitive Science 1. Chichester: Ellis Horwood.
    Novak, J. D. & Gowin, D.B. (1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge, London: Cambridge University Press.
    Novak, J. D. (1979a). Applying psychology and philosophy to the improvement of laboratory teaching. The American Biology Teacher, 41, 446-470.
    Pines, A. L. (1985). Toward a taxonomy of conceptual relations and the implications for the evaluation of cognitive structures. In Leo H. T. West & A. Leon Pines (Eds.), Cognitive Structure and Conceptual Change. Orlando: Academic Press.
    Posner, G. J. and the Cognitive Structure Group (1977). The Assessment of Cognitive Structure. Research Report No.5. Ithaca, New York: Department of Education, Cornell University.
    Preece, P. F. W. (1976a). Associative Structure Concepts. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 174-183.
    Rips, L. J., Shoben, E. J., & Smith, E. E. (1993). Semantic distance and the verification of semantic relations. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 665-681.
    Rumelhart, D. 1980. Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. R. Spiro, B. Bruce and W. Brewer. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Rumelhart, D. E., & Norman, D. A. (1988). Representation in memory. In R. C. Atkinson, R. J. Herrnstein, G. Lindzey, & Luce, R. D. (Eds.), Stevens’ handbook of experimenttal psychology: Vol. 2. Learning and Cognitive(2nd ed., pp.551-587), New York: Wiley.
    Ryle, G. (1949). The Concept of Mind. New York: Barnes and Noble.
    Schacter, D. (1989). Memory. In M.I. Posner (Ed.) Foundations of cognitive science (pp. 683-725). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Shavelson, R. J. and Stanton, G C. (1975). Construct Vaildation: Methodology and Application to Three Measures of Cognitive Structure. Journal of Educational Measurement, 12, 67-85.
    Smith, E. E., Shoben, E. J., & Rips, L. J. (1974). Structure and process in semantic memory: A featural model for semantic decision. Psychological Review, 81, 214-241.
    Solso, R. L. (1998). Cognitive Psychology (5th). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
    Squire, L. R. (1986). Mechanisms of memory. Science, 232, 1612-1619.
    Squire, L. R. (1993). The organization of declarative and nondeclarative memory. In T. Ono, L.R. Squire, M. E. Raichle, D. I. Perrett, & M. Fukuda (Eds.), Brain mechanisms of perception and memory: From neuron to behavio(pp. 219-227). New York: Oxford University Press.
    Stewart, J. (1979). Content and Cognitive Structure: Critique of Assessment and Representation Techniques Used by Science Education Researchers. Science Education, 63, 395-405.
    Stewart, J. (1980). Techniques for Assessing and Representing Information in Cognitive Structure. Science Education, 64, 223-235.
    Sutton, C. R. (1980a). The Learner’s Prior Knowledge: a Critical Review of Techniques for Probing Its Organization. European Journal of Science Education, 2, 107-20.
    Tennyson, R. D., & Park, O. (1980). The teaching of concepts: A review of instructional design research literature. Review of Educational Research, 50, 55-70.
    Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory, In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.), Organization of memory. New York: Academic Press.
    Tulving, E. (1985). How many memory systems are there? American Psychologist, 40, 385-398.
    Tulving, E. (1993). What is episode memory? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2, 67-70.
    Waugh, N. C., & Norman, D. A. (1965). Primary memory. Psychological Review, 72, 89-104.
    Wehman, P., & McLaughlin, P.J. (1981). Program development in special education. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    White, R. T. (1985). Interview protocols and dimensions of cognitive structure. In Leo H. T. West & A. Leon Pines (Eds.), Cognitive Structure and Conceptual Change. Orlando: Academic Press.
    White, R. T. (1988). Learning Science. New York. Basil Blackwell Inc.

    QR CODE