簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 邱于真
Yu-Chen Chiu
論文名稱: 國中英文識字困難學生之中文識字能力及中、英文識字基礎認知能力表現之相關研究
The Relation of Chinese and English Word Recognition and Cognitive Components of the Junior High School Students with English Word Recognition Difficulties
指導教授: 洪儷瑜
Hung, Li-Yu
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 特殊教育學系
Department of Special Education
論文出版年: 2009
畢業學年度: 97
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 177
中文關鍵詞: 識字困難中文識字能力英文識字能力認知能力國中生
英文關鍵詞: word recognition difficulties, Chinese word recognition, English word recognition, cognitive components, Junior High School Student
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:339下載:25
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探討在以英語為外語的識字學習環境中,中、英文識字基礎認知能力影響英文識字能力的關鍵因素以及中、英文識字能力之關係。以二十名台北縣市國中階段英文識字困難學生為主要研究對象,依據配對條件選取國一同生理年齡學生及小五同英文識字能力學生各二十名作為對照組,三組皆接受中、英文識字能力以及識字基礎認知能力的測驗,中、英文識字基礎認知能力測驗包含「注音符號認讀」、「中文去音首」、「中文假音認讀」、「中文顏色唸名」、「英文字母認讀」、「英文去音首」、「英文假音認讀」及「英文顏色唸名」。採用三組比較方式,瞭解中、英文識字基礎認知能力促成英文識字困難的關鍵因素,試圖驗證Sparks等人的語言譯錄缺陷假設。
    本研究主要發現如下:
    一、英文識字基礎認知能力中以英文去音首為英文識字之關鍵
    英文識字困難學生除了「英文字母認讀」外,其餘英文識字基礎認知能力表現上皆落後於國一同生理年齡學生,然而英文識字困難學生在「英文去音首」亦顯著落後小五同英文識字能力學生,顯示「英文去音首」能力,是英文識字之關鍵能力,與文獻看法一致。
    二、中文識字基礎認知能力中以假音念讀為英文識字之關鍵
    英文識字困難學生在中文識字基礎認知能力上,在「中文假音認讀」、「中文顏色唸名」表現上顯著落後於國一同理年齡學生,而「中文假音認讀」表現上亦落後於小五同英文識字能力學生,顯示英文識字困難學生,在母語識字困難表現上可回溯到「中文假音認讀」能力,支持Sparks等人的語言譯錄假設缺陷,代表母語音形對應能力的確在英語識字學習表現上佔有重要地位。
    三、英文識字困難學生在中文識字表現可區分兩種
    英文識字困難學生依據中文識字能力可以區分兩種,大部分英文識字困難學生之中文識字能力與同儕無異,僅有少部份學生在英文識字上的困難可追溯到中文識字困難的表現,大部份英文識字困難學生在母語環境中累積足夠的學習經驗及策略,因而掩蓋掉形音連結的潛在問題。
    本研究根據研究結果及研究限制,對教育工作者及未來研究提出相關建議。

    The purpose of this study was to find out which cognitive components of Chinese and English word recognition may cause junior high school students’ English word recognition difficulties. Sixty students were selected by different criteria for three groups. Twenty students with English word recognition difficulties (ERD) and twenty students with controlling chronological age (CA) were 7th graders in junior high school, while another twenty students with English word recognition ability control (RA) were 5th graders in the elementary school. Three groups were measured by word recognition, letter knowledge, phoneme deletion, pseudo-word reading, and color rapid naming in both Chinese and English language. By comparing ERD with CA and RA, finding the critical factors of English word recognition is the main research question, which verifies Spark’s Linguistic Coding Deficit Hypothesis. The major findings of this study were as follows:
    1.The critical factor in Cognitive components of English word recognition is English phoneme deletion
    ERD performed significantly lower than CA in all English cognitive components except English letter knowledge. However, ERD also performed ignificantly lower than RA in English phoneme deletion. To sum up, English phoneme deletion was the cause of English word recognition disability.
    2.The critical factor in Cognitive components of Chinese word recognition is Chinese pseudo-word reading
    ERD performed significantly lower than CA in Chinese pseudo-word reading and Chinese color rapid naming. However, ERD performed significantly lower than RA in Chinese pseudo-word reading. The implication was that Chinese pseudo-word reading play an important role in English word recognition. The Linguistic Coding Deficit Hypothesis was again supported by the result. When students had difficulties in orthography of native language, the same difficulties would appear again in foreign language learning.
    3.Students with English word recognition difficulties have two kinds of Chinese word recognition ability
    The result showed that Chinese word recognition ability could be an indicator of the ability of English word recognition. However, no significant differences were found between ERD and RA. Only a few ERD students’ English word recognition difficulties could be traced back to their Chinese word recognition difficulties. Some ERD students had acquired enough learning experience to cover the potential difficulties of word recognition.
    According to the aforementioned findings, the limitations of this study and the recommendations for further studies and practical implementation were made.

    中文摘要…………………………………………………………………Ⅰ 英文摘要…………………………………………………………………Ⅲ 目次………………………………………………………………………Ⅵ 附錄次……………………………………………………………………Ⅷ 表次………………………………………………………………………Ⅷ 圖次………………………………………………………………………Ⅹ 第一章 緒論…………………………………………………………1 第一節 研究動機與目的……………………………………………1 第二節 待答問題與研究假設………………………………………8 第三節 名詞解釋……………………………………………………12 第二章 文獻討………………………………………………………14 第一節 英語學習的重要性…………………………………………14 第二節 外語學習困難的理論基礎…………………………………17 第三節 識字能力與識字基礎認知能力……………………………27 第四節 中、英文識字基礎認知能力與識字能力之相關研究……46 第三章 研究方法……………………………………………………74 第一節 研究對象……………………………………………………74 第二節 研究設計……………………………………………………86 第三節 研究工具……………………………………………………88 第四節 研究步驟…………………………………………………100 第五節 資料處理與分析…………………………………………102 第四章 研究結果…………………………………………………104 第一節 三組在英文識字基礎認知能力之表現…………………104 第二節 三組在中文識字基礎認知能力之表現…………………115 第三節 三組學生中文識字能力之表現…………………………127 第四節 英文識字困難學生表現…………………………………132 第五章 討論………………………………………………………137 第一節 英文識字基礎認知能力與英文識字能力之關係………137 第二節 中文識字基礎認知能力與英文識字能力之關係………144 第三節 中文識字能力與英文識字能力之關係…………………149 第六章 結論與建議………………………………………………153 第一節 結論………………………………………………………153 第二節 研究限制…………………………………………………155 第三節 建議………………………………………………………157 參考文獻………………………………………………………………161 中文部分………………………………………………………………161 英文部分………………………………………………………………167 附錄一 家長同意書…………………………………………………176 附錄二 學生基本資料調查表………………………………………177

    中文部分
    王瓊珠、洪儷瑜、張郁雯、陳秀芬(2008)。一到九年級學生國字識字量發展。教育心理學報,39,555-568。
    李桂英(2007)。聲韻覺識和中文唸名速度與閱讀能力相關之研究。國立臺東大學特殊教育碩士論文,未出版。
    李智馨(2005)。音韻覺識對臺灣學生英文閱讀與發音習得的影響。國立清華大學外語與文學系碩士論文,未出版。
    李俊仁(1999)。聲韻處理能力和閱讀能力的關係。國立中正大學心理學研究所博士論文,未出版。
    但昭蕙(2006)。台灣國小四年級學童中英文聲韻覺識與英文識字能力之研究。國立台北教育大學兒童英語教育學系碩士論文,未出版。
    吳宜貞、黃秀霜(1998)。認字薄弱群體之閱讀能力及相關變項探討。特殊教育研究學刊,16,203-224。
    吳怡潔(2006)。「閱讀的簡單觀點模式」在中文一般及閱讀理解困難學童之驗證研究。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文,未出版。
    吳怡靜、何琦瑜(2007)。英語力敲開全球化大門。於何琦瑜、吳毓珍主編:教出英語力—小孩學英語,何時學?如何學?台北市:天下雜誌。
    林彥同(2001)。幼稚園至國小三年級學童各類唸名速度能力的發展及其與閱讀能力的相關。國立高雄師範大學特殊教育系碩士論文,未出版。
    林沛穎(2005)。國小學習障礙學生英語語音知覺之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文,未出版。
    邱上真、洪碧霞(1996)。國語文低成就學生閱讀表現之追蹤研究(Ⅱ)。行政院國科會專題研究計畫報告,未出版。
    邱嘉蓉(2003)。國民中學一年級學生之國文與英語基本認知能力、基礎閱讀與語文學業成就關係之研究—以高雄縣鳳西國中為例。國立高雄師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文,未出版。
    柯華葳(1993)。台灣地區閱讀研究文獻回顧,載於中國語文心裡學研究第一年度結案報告(pp.31-76)。國立中正大學認知科學研究中心。
    柯華葳、李俊仁(1996)。國小低年級學生語音覺識能力與認字能力的發展:一個縱貫的研究。國立中正大學學報-社會科學,7,49-66。
    柯華葳、李俊仁(1999)。閱讀困難的理論架構與驗證,載於柯華葳、洪儷軒主編,學童閱讀困難的鑑定與診斷。嘉義縣:國立中正大學認知科學研究中心。
    柯娜雯(2003)。國小英語低成就學生中、英文音韻處理與識字能力研究。國立台北師範學院特殊教育學系碩士論文,未出版。
    洪儷瑜、王瓊珠、張郁雯、陳秀芬(2006)。常見字流暢性測驗(看字讀音造詞測驗)。台北:台灣師範大學特殊教育中心。
    洪燕玲、黃秀霜、周奕良、柳雅煤、林娟如、謝麗雪(2006)。英文認字測驗。台北:心理。
    洪慧芳(1993)。文字組合規則與漢語閱讀障礙—對漢語閱讀障礙學童的一項追蹤研究。國立中正大學心裡學研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    胡永崇(2003)。國小四年級閱讀困難學生識字相關因素及不同識字教學策略之教學成效比較研究。屏東師院學報,19,177-216。
    胡志偉、顏乃欣(1992)。閱讀中文的心理歷程:80年代研究的回顧與展望。載於曾志朗編,中國語文心理學研究報告(pp. 77-124)。臺北:遠流。
    胡志偉、顏乃欣(1995)。中文字的心理歷程。載於曾進興編,語言病理學基礎第一卷(第二章)。台北:心理。
    胡潔芳(2001)。從語言學習的本質探討外語學習能力的差異。教育研究,89,66-74。
    胡潔芳(2005)。母語音韻發展成熟度與外語學習之關係。兒童外語發展與學習研討會論文集,25-35。台北:台北市立教育大學兒童發展研究所。
    孫麗瑛(2002)。國小學童英文聲韻覺識能力及認字能力之相關研究。台中師範學院教育測驗統計研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    教育部(2006)。九年一貫課程綱要。取自國民教育社群網:http://teach.eje.edu.tw/about/about.php(民95. 3. 10)
    教育部(2008)。挑戰2008國家發展重點計畫—E世代人才培育計畫。行政院經濟建設委員會。
    黃秀霜(1997)。兒童早期音韻覺識對其三年後中文認字能力關係之縱貫性研究。臺南師院學報,30,263-288。
    黃秀霜、詹欣蓉(1997)。閱讀障礙兒童之音韻覺識、字覺識及聲調覺識之分析。特殊教育與復健學報,5,125-138。
    黃柏華(2004)。國中讀寫障礙學生在英文讀寫字能力表現之相關研究。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文,未出版。
    陳怡伶(2005)。閱讀障礙學生的聲韻覺識、唸名速度和視覺技巧與識字的關係。國立臺南大學特殊教育碩士論文,未出版。
    陳美文(2002)。國小讀寫困難學生認知能力之分析研究。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文,未出版。
    陳姝嫈 (1998)。叫名速度 工作記憶與國語文能力相關研究。國立台東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    陳慶順(2000)。識字困難學生與普通學生識字認知成份之比較研究。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育學系特教教學碩士班論文,未出版。
    曾世杰(1996)。閱讀低成就及一般學童的閱讀歷程成分分析研究。載於台東師範學院(主編),八十五學年度師範學院教育學術論文發表會論文集。台東市:台東師範學院。(國科會報告)
    曾世杰(1999)。國語文低成就學童之工作記憶、聲韻處理能力與唸名速度之研究。載於柯華葳、洪儷軒主編,學童閱讀困難的鑑定與診斷。嘉義縣:國立中正大學認知科學研究中心。
    曾世杰(2004)。聲韻覺識、唸名速度與中文閱讀障礙。台北:心理。
    曾世杰、邱上真、林彥同(2003)。幼稚園至國小三年級學童各類唸名速度能力之研究。師大學報:教育類,48,261-290。
    曾世杰、陳淑麗、謝嬌燕(2006)。聲韻覺識測驗。台北:台灣師範大學特殊教育中心。
    曾世杰、簡淑真、張媛婷、周蘭芳、連芸伶(2005)。以早期唸名速度及聲韻覺識預測中文閱讀與認字:一個追蹤四年的相關研究。特殊教育研究學刊,28,123-144。
    張武昌、周中天、陳純音、葉錫南、林正昌、許月貴等(2004)。國民中學學生基本學力測驗英語雙峰現象暨改進措施結案報告。教育部。
    張顯達(2007)。什麼是「英語力」?於何琦瑜、吳毓珍主編:教出英語力—小孩學英語,何時學?如何學?台北市:天下雜誌。
    張葶葶(2004)。英語為外國語學習者的英語字詞辨識歷程—以詞長效果及事件相關電位指標論證。國立中央大學認知與神經科學研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    詹益智(2003)。母語音韻覺識在英文拼字與讀字上所扮演的角色。國立政治大學語言研究所碩士論,未出版。
    鄭恆雄主編(2002)。大考中心高中英文參考詞彙表編修研究計畫報告第二期。大學入學考試中心。
    劉家智(2002)。國小四.五.六年級兒童唸名速度與國語文能力相關之研究。國立台東師範學院教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    謝俊明(2003)。閱讀障礙學生與一般學生在唸名速度上之比較研究。國立台東大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。

    英文部分
    Aaron, P. G. & Joshi, R. M. (1992). Reading Problems: Consultation and Remediation. NY: A Division of Guilford Publications.
    Backman, J. E., Mamen, M. & Ferguson, H. G. (1984). Reading level design: Conceptual and methodological issues in reading research. Psychological Bulletin, 3, 560-568.
    Bryant, P. E. (2007). Phonological development and reading. In P. D. Pumfrey & C. D. Elliott (Eds.), Children’s Difficulties in Reading, Spelling and Writing (pp.63-82). NY: Routledge.
    Bryant, P. E. & Goswami, U. (1986). Strengths and weakenss of the reading level design: A comm.ent on Backman, Mamen, and Ferguson. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 101-103.
    Castles, A. & Colheart, M. (2004). Is there a causal link from phonological awareness to success in learning to read? Cognition, 91, 77-111.
    Chall, J. S. (1996). Stages of Reading Development. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace.
    Charolles-Sprenger, L. (1991). Word-identification strategies in a picture context: comparisons between “good” and “poor” reader. In L. Rieben & C. A. Perfetti, (eds) Learning to Read: Basic Research and Its Implications. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Ch13
    Crombie, M. A. (1997). The effects of specific learning difficulties (dyslexia) on the learning of a foreign language in school. Dyslexia, 3, 27-47.
    Dinklage, K. (1971). Inability to learn a foreign language. In G. Blaine & C. McArthur (eds.). Emotional Problems of the Student. NY: Appleton-Century. 185-206.
    Ehri, L. C. & McCormick, S. (1998). Phases of word learning: Implications for instruction with delayed and disabled readers. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 14, 135-163.
    Ehri, L. C. (2000). Learning to read and learning to spell: Two sides of a coin. Topics in Language Disorders, 20, 19-36.
    Frith, U. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In K. E. Patterson, J. C. Marshall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.), Surface Dyslexia: Neuropsychological and Cognitive Studies of Phonological Reading (pp.301-330). London: Erlbaum.
    Gardner, R. C. & MacIntyre, P. D. (1992). A student’s contributions to second language learning part 1: Cognitive variables. Language Teaching, 25, 211-220.
    Gardner, R. C. & MacIntyre, P. D. (1993). A student’s contributions to second language learning part 2: Affective variables. Language Teaching, 26, 1-11.
    Goswami, U. (2002). Phonology, reading development, and dyslexia: A cross-linguistic perspective. Annals of Dyslexia, 52, 141-163.
    Hammill, D. D. (2004). What do we know correlates of reading. Council for Exceptional Children, 70, 453-468.
    Harrison, G. L. & Krol, L. (2007). Relationship between L1 and L2 word-level reading and phonological processing in adults learning English as a second language. Journal of Research in Reading, 30, 379-393.
    Ho, C. S.-H. & Lai, D. N.-C.(1999). Naming Speed deficits and phonological memory deficits in Chinese developmental dyslexia. Learning and Individual Differences, 11, 173-184.
    Hu, C. F. (胡潔芳) (2003). Phonological memory, phonological awareness, and foreign language word learning. Language Learning, 53, 429-462.
    Hu, C. F. (胡潔芳)(2007). Phonological processing as early indicator of L2 word learning difficulties. In proceedings of 2007 International Conference on English Learning and Teaching: Linking Theory with Practice, 8-25. Taipei, Taiwan: Crane.
    Huang, H. S. & Hanley, J. R. (1994). Phonological awareness and visual skills in learning to read Chinese and English. Cognition, 54, 73-98.
    Jennings, J. H., Caldwell, J. S. & Lerner, J. W. (2006). Reading Problems: Assessment and Teaching Strategies. Boston : Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.
    Jongejan, W., Verhoeven, L. & Siegal, L. S. (2007). Predictors of reading and spelling abilities in first-and second-language learners. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 835-851.
    Kahn-Horwitz, J., Shimron, J. & Sparks, R. L. (2006). Weak and strong novice readers of English as a foreign language: Effects of first language and socioeconomic status. Annals of Dyslexia, 56, 161-185.
    Lerner, J. (2006). Learning Disability and Related Disorders: Characteristics and Teaching Strategies. Boston, MA: Houghton.
    Lundberg, I. (2002). Second language learning and reading with the additional load of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 52, 162-187.
    McBride-Chang, C. (1995). Phonological processing, speech perception, and reading disability: An integrative review. Educational Psychologist, 30, 109-121.
    McBride-Chang, C. (1996). Models of speech perception and phonological processing in reading. Child Development, 67, 1836-1856.
    McBride-Chang, C., Bialystok, E., Chong, K. K. Y., & Li, Y. ( 2004). Levels of phonological awareness in three cultures. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 89, 93-111.
    McBride-Chang, C. & Ho, C. S-K. (2000). Developmental issues in Chinese children’s character acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 50-55.
    McBride-Chang, C. & Ho, C. S-K. (2005). Predictors of beginning reading in Chinese and English: A 2 year longitudinal study of Chinese kindergartners. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9, 117-144.
    McBride-Chang, C. & Kail, R. V. (2002). Cross-cultural similaries in the predictors of reading acquisition. Child Development, 73, 1392-1407.
    Mitchell, R. & Myles, F. (2004). Second Language Learning. London: Hodder Arnold.
    Meschyan, G. & Hernandez, A. (2002). Is native-language decoding skill related to second-language learning? Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 14-22.
    Morais, J., Cary, L., Alegria, J & Bettelson, P. (1979). Does awarenesss of speech as a sequence of phonemes arise spontaneously? Cognition, 19, 323-331.
    Rayner, K., Foorman, B. R., Perfetti, C. A., Pesetsky, D. & Seidenberg, M. S. (2001). How psychological science informs the teaching of reading. Psychological Science in the Public Interest. 2, 31-73.
    Read, C., Zhang, Y., Nie, H. & Ding, B. (1986). The ability to manipulate speech sound depends on knowing alphabetic spelling. Cognition, 24, 31-34.
    Segalowitz, N. (1997). Individual differences in second language acquisition. In Groot, M. B. de. & Kroll, J. F. (eds.). Tutorials in Biligualism. New Jersy: Lawrence Erlbaum Association. Chapter 3.
    Sparks, R. L. (2006). Is there a “disability” for learning a foreign language? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 544-557.
    Sparks, R. L. & Ganschow, L. (1991). Foreign language learning differences: affective or native language aptitude differences? The Modern Language Journal, 75, 3-16.
    Sparks, R. L. & Ganschow, L. (1993). The impact of native language learning problems on foreign language learning: Case study illustrations of the Linguistic Coding Deficit Hypothesis. The Modern Language Journal, 77, 59-74.
    Sparks, R. L., Ganschow, L., Anderson, R., Javorsky, J., Skinner, S. & Patton, J. (1994) . Differences in language performance among high- and low-anxious college foreign language learners. Modern Language Journal, 78, 41-55.
    Sparks, R. L., Ganschow, L., Artzer, M., Siebenhar, D., Plageman, M., & Patton, J. (1998). Differences in native-language skills, foreign-language aptitude, and foreign-language grades among high- average-, and low-proficiency foreign-language learners: two studies. Language Testing, 15, 181-216.
    Sparks, R. L., Ganschow, L., Patton, J. & Hunbach, N. (2006). Native language predictors of foreign language proficiency and foreign language aptitude. Annals of Dyslexia, 56, 129-160.
    Sparks, R. L., Ganschowm, L. & Pohlman, J. (1989). "Linguistic Coding Deficit" in foreign language learners. Annals of Dyslexia, 38, 179-195.
    Sparks, R. L., Philps, L. & Javorsky, J. (2003). Studies classified as LD who petitioned for or fulfilled the college foreign language requirement- Are they different? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 348-362.
    Spear-Swerling, L. & Sternberg, R. J. (1994). The road not taken: An integrative theoretical model of reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 91-103.
    Spolsky, B. (1989). Conditions for Second Language Learning: Introduction to a General Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Sun, S. H. (孫淑惠)(1999). American English Phonetics. Taipei, Taiwan: Crane.
    Swanson, H. L., Trainin, G., Necoech, D. M. & Hammill, D. D. (2003). Rapid naming, phonological awarenesss, and reading: A meta-analysis of the correlateon evidence. Review Educational Research, 73, 407-440.
    Pimsleur, Paul, D. M., Sunland, & Ruth D. McIntyre.(1964). Under achievement in Foreign Language Learning. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 2, 113-150
    Wade-Wooly, L. (1999). First language influences on second language word reading: All roads lead to Rome. Language Learning, 49, 447-471.
    Wagner, R. K. & Torgesen, J. K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causual role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192-212.
    Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K. & Rashotte, C. A. (1994). Development of reading-related phonological processing abilities: New evidence of bidirectional causality from a latent variable longitude study. Developmental Psychology, 30, 73-87.
    Wolf, M. (1999) What time may tell: Towards a new conceptualization of developmental dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 49, 3-28.
    Wolf, M., Bowers, P.G. & Biddle, K.(2000). Naming-speed processes, timing, and reading: A conceptual review. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 387-407.
    Wren, S. (2000). The Cognitive Foundations of Learning to Read: A Framework. Southwest Educational Development Laboratory. Available from Southwest Educational Development Laboratory website, http://www.sedl.org/reading/framework/
    Yin, L., Anderson, R. C. & Zhu, J. (2007). Stages in Chinese children’s reading of English words. Journal of Education Psychology, 99, 852-866.
    Yopp, H. K. (1988). The validity and reliability of phonemic awareness tests. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 2, 159-177.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE