簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 王怡人
Wang, Yi Jen
論文名稱: 班級層級功能本位介入小組方案改善學前融合班幼兒活動參與行為之研究
The Study of Class-Wide Function-Based Intervention Team on the Engagement Behaviors of Preschoolers in An Inclusive Class
指導教授: 洪儷瑜
Hung, Li-Yu
口試委員: 陳佩玉
Chen, Pei-Yu
蔡淑妃
Tsai, Shu-Fei
口試日期: 2021/08/24
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 特殊教育學系碩士在職專班
Department of Special Education_Continuing Education Master's Program of Special Education
論文出版年: 2021
畢業學年度: 110
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 132
中文關鍵詞: 班級層級功能本位介入小組學前融合班活動參與挑戰行為
英文關鍵詞: Class-wide function-related intervention teams, engagement behaviors, challenging behavior, inclusive class in a preschool
研究方法: 實驗設計法單一受試研究法
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202101138
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:237下載:92
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究目的在探討班級層級功能本位介入小組(Class-Wide Function-Based Intervention Teams,簡稱 CW-FIT)方案對提升學前融合班幼兒活動參與度之成效。研究方法採用單一受試研究之A-B-A-B倒返設計,以一所臺北市幼兒園中大混齡融合班全班幼兒作為研究參與對象,研究者為CW-FIT方案的執行者(融合班教師)。自變項為CW-FIT方案,針對第一層級以融合班全班幼兒作為實施對象,先教導活動中的適當行為,再透過團體增強進行介入管理。依變項則為全班幼兒在團體討論以及出汗性大肌肉兩項活動的參與行為、目標幼兒在團體討論的活動參與行為和挑戰行為,以及教師的鼓勵與斥責行為之變化情形。
    研究結果顯示CW-FIT對提升學前融合班全班幼兒與目標幼兒的活動參與度有顯著功能關係,且對目標幼兒降低挑戰行為方面在第一層級即達預期成效。在班級活動中,CW-FIT能提升老師的鼓勵行為,並具有維持效果,此外,本研究CW-FIT實施程序亦獲得高的精準度,教師與幼兒對CW-FIT的介入目標、過程和結果等三項社會效度亦給予肯定。

    Young children with special needs, such as emotional behavior challenge or high-risk, encounter difficulties in learning and getting along with peers in an inclusive class. A class-wide function-related intervention teams (CW-FIT) program based on PBS (positive behavior support), which escalates from an individual to a classroom, is an intervention with evidenced-based effective strategies. The CW-FIT program is combined the first and second tier interventions program by Howard Will. The CW-FIT program, a first tier intervention program, was designed for contributing to (a) teaching appropriate classroom social skills, (b) using praise and group contingency to provide differential reinforcement, and (c) eliminating the potential reinforcement of the problematic behavior of all students.
    The A-B-A-B of single subject design was used in this study to intvestigate the effectiveness of CW-FIT in an inclusive class to improve preschoolers’ engagement behavior. The study was conducted in an inclusive class with 29 mixed-aged young children range from five to six years old in Taipei city. The whole class and one target student were observed in both circle time and physical activity. The engagement behavior was defined increase of appropriate behavioral and decrease of disruptive behavior. The fidelity of procedure and social vadility of the study were collected.
    The results of the study are concluded as follows:
    1. The CW-FIT program effectively increased the engagement behaviors and reduced the chanllenging behaviors of whole class students and target student in inclusive preschool class. The challenging behaviors of target student reduced to show the immediate and maintainable effect.
    2. The CW-FIT program increased the frequency of teacher’s praise for the appropriate behavior of students.
    3. Both teachers and students reported high social validity to the aims, processes, and results of CW-FIT program intervention through interview.
    4. The study also showed the highest fidelity for the preschool teachers on implementing CW-FIT program in circle time and physical activity. improved engagement behaviors of preschool young children in an inclusive class.

    第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的、待答問題 6 第三節 名詞釋義 6 第二章 文獻探討 9 第一節 學前融合教育理念發展與實施 9 第二節 學齡前幼兒的班級活動參與 17 第三節 班級層級功能本位介入小組內涵與實施 23 第四節 CW-FIT方案運用於活動參與之相關研究 31 第三章 研究方法 39 第一節 研究對象 39 第二節 研究設計 40 第三節 班級層級功能本位介入小組方案 48 第四節 研究工具 53 第五節 研究程序 57 第六節 資料分析 62 第四章 研究結果 69 第一節 CW-FIT方案對改善融合班幼兒活動參與行為之成效分析 69 第二節 CW-FIT對教師行為(鼓勵/斥責)之變化 81 第三節 CW-FIT對影響學前融合班幼兒與教師之社會效度分析 85 第五章 綜合討論 88 第一節 CW-FIT對於改善幼兒園融合班活動參與之成效 88 第二節 CW-FIT方案在學前融合班的可行性 92 第六章 結論與建議 96 第一節 研究結論 96 第二節 建議 98 參考文獻 101 附錄 113 附錄一 CW-FIT相關研究學生目標行為之定義與觀察方式彙整表 113 附錄二 CW-FIT相關研究教師目標行為之定義與觀察方式彙整表 115 附錄三 前導研究: CW-FIT第一、二層級實施程序 116 附錄四 家長同意書 119 附錄五 出汗性大肌肉活動觀察紀錄表 120 附錄六 團體討論觀察紀錄表 121 附錄七 CW-FIT實施程序檢核表 122 附錄八-1 介入回饋問卷-教師版 123 附錄八-2 介入回饋問卷幼兒版 125 附錄九-1 行為規範教導海報-團體討論 126 附錄九-2 行為規範教導海報-出汗性大肌肉活動 129 附錄十 表現好行為的小組遊戲團體計分表 132

    參考文獻
    中文文獻
    王天苗 (2001) : 運用教學支援建立融合教育的實施模式。特殊教育研究學刊,21,27-51。

    王天苗 (2002) : 發展遲緩幼兒在融合教育環境裏的學習。特殊教育研究學刊,23,1-23。

    王天苗 (2003) : 學前融合教育實施的問題和對策-以台北市國小附幼為例。特殊教育研究學刊,25,1-25。

    王珮玲、許惠萍 (2000) : 學前兒童氣質與問題行為之研究。臺北市立師範學院學報,31,209-228。

    方婉真(2008):學前融合教育班教師教學困擾之調查研究。國立臺南大學特殊教育 學系教學碩士論文(未出版)。

    杜正治 (2006) : 單一受試研究法。臺北:心理。

    吳百祿、王財印、林子雯、劉斐文(譯) (2006):幼兒特殊教育(Richard Gargiulo .Jennifer Kilgo著:Young Children With Special Needs)。高雄:麗文文化。(原著出版於2004)

    吳沂蓁 (2016) : 班級層級功能本位介入小組對提升普通班自閉症學生班級參與度之成效(未出版)。國立臺北教育大學特殊教育學系碩士論文,臺北。

    吳淑美(1998): 學前融合教學理念篇。台北:心理。

    吳淑美(2004): 融合班的理念與實務。台北:心理。

    吳淑美 (2016) : 融合教育理論與實務。臺北:心理。

    吳淑美 (2019) : 學前融合教育:理論與實務。臺北:心理。

    呂依蓉 (2016) :《薩拉曼卡宣言與特殊需求教育行動綱領》:翻譯融合教育檢視與反思(一)。特殊教育季刊,138,21-28。

    呂依蓉 (2016) :《薩拉曼卡宣言與特殊需求教育行動綱領》:翻譯融合教育檢視與反思(二)。特殊教育季刊,139,35-41。

    李秀珠 (2005) : 高雄市學前融合教育班教師角色知覺與教學支援需求之研究。國立台北教育大學特殊教育學系研究所碩士論文,臺北。

    谷瑞勉 (1999) : 幼稚園班級經營導論。台北:心理。

    谷瑞勉(2014): 幼兒園班級經營—反省性教師的思考與行動。臺北:心理。

    林坤燦 (2012) : 融合教育之回顧與展望。2014中華民國特殊教育學會46週年年會暨學術研討會議-議事手冊。國立臺灣師範大學。

    林姝吟、陳淑美 (2017) : 我國幼兒園實施融合教育之實務探討。臺灣教育評論月刊,6(2),63-67。

    周淑惠 (2006) : 幼兒園課程與教學:探究取向之主題課程。台北市,心理。

    周新富(2006): 班級經營( 初版)。臺北:華騰文化。

    柯秋雪 (2013) : 從國際教育政策談我國優質學前融合教育之發展方向。國民教育,54(1),55-66。

    柯雅齡 (2012) : 國內融合教育支援服務運作之評析。臺灣教育評論月刊,1(8),doi:10.6791/TER.201206.0038

    胡倫茹 (2018) : 班級層級功能本位小組方案改善國小融合班學生課堂參與行為之研究。國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文,臺北。

    洪儷瑜 (1992) :「非嫌惡行為處置」對智障者問題行為處理之運用。特殊教育季刊,45,9-14。

    洪儷瑜 (1998) : ADHD學生的教育與輔導。臺北:心理出版社。

    洪儷瑜 (2018) : 緒論:正向行為支持。載於洪儷瑜、鳳華、何美慧、張蓓莉、翁素珍主編 : 特殊教育學生的正向行為支持 (3-18頁)。新 北 : 心理。

    施顯烇(1995): 嚴重問題行為的處理。臺北:五南。

    特殊教育法(1997,2009,2014):(一)義字第6692 號令公布;中華民國八十六年五月十四日總統華總(一)義字第8600112820號令修正公布;中華民國九十八年十一月十八日總統華總(一)義字第10300085151 號令公布;中華民國一百零三年六月十八日總統華總

    教育部 (2020) : 特殊教育通報網。2020年3月20日,取自http://www.set.edu.tw/

    陳千玉(譯) (1997) : 行為改變技術。(A E. Kazdin著: BehaviorModification in Applied settings )。台北:五南。(原著出版於1993)

    陳佩玉、蔡淑妃 (2013) : 普通班教師如何應用功能行為評量概念處理行為問題-對症下藥之宜殊,國民教育,54(1),67-75。

    陳佩玉、蔡淑妃 (2015) : 班級層級功能本位介入小組方案(CW-FIT)的內涵與應用。特教論壇,19,24-34。

    陳清溪 (2000) : 啟智班教師教學支援需求與教學自我效能之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育系研究所博士論文,彰化。

    莊令如、唐榮昌(2011): 應用自我管理策略改善自閉症學童分心行為。特教論壇,11,74-81。

    郭陸錦、林美秀 (2016) : 合作學習教學在幼兒園主題課程上的應用。臺灣教育評論會刊,5 (4),82-86。

    鈕文英(2001) :身心障礙者行為問題處理正向行為支持取向。台北:心理。

    鈕文英(2008) : 擁抱個別差異的新典範-融合教育。台北:心理。

    鈕文英、吳裕益 (2019) : 單一個案研究方法。臺北:心理。

    廖又儀(2007): 幼教教師實施學前融合教育的困難與因應策略。教師之友,48(2),52-58。

    張芸瑄 (2018) : 國中教師檢視班級層級功能本位介入小組之適用性 與解決其班級經營困擾之行動研究。國立臺北教育大學教育學院特殊教育學系研究所碩士論文,臺北。

    張英熙(2015) : 阿德勒鼓勵訓練方案對幼兒園教師的影響。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊,8 (3),29-52。

    張翠娥 (2009) : 專業諮詢介入學前融合班級發展個別化教育計畫與 實施成效。幼兒保育學刊,7,25-44。

    臧瑩卓(2011):幼兒園教師班級經營策略運用情形之研究。幼兒保育學刊,9,17-35。

    鳳華、鍾儀潔、蔡馨惠、羅雅瑜、王慧婷、洪雅慧、吳雅萍、吳佩芳、羅雅芬著 (2015) : 應用行為分析導論。台北市 : 心理。

    蔡淑桂(2004): 幼稚園專家教師與新手教師的班級經營策略之比較研究。康寧學報,6,181-224。

    蔡淑玲 (1998) : 一位自閉症幼兒在融合教育政策實施下的狀況。國立師範大學家政教育學系研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北。

    盧明 (2015) : 學前融合教育理論與實務。台北:華都文化。

    謝中君 (2018) : 發展遲緩兒幼兒園活動參與研究。特殊教育研究學刊,43(2),31-64。

    簡楚瑛(1996): 幼稚園班級經營。台北,文景。

    鐘梅菁(2001) : 學前教師融合教育專業知能之研究。特殊教育學報,15,309-335。

    鐘梅菁(2018) : 學前融合教育方案之建構要素。台灣教育評論月刊,7(6),197-202。

    英文文獻
    Booren, L. M., Downer, J. T., & Vitiello, V. E. (2012).Observations of children’s interactions with teachers, peers, and tasks across preschool classroom activity settings. Early Education & Development, 23, 517–538.
    Brennan, L. M., Shaw, D. S., Dishion, T. J., & Wilson, M. N. (2015). The
    predictiveutility of early childhood disruptive behaviors for school-age socialfunctioning. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 43(6), 1187–1199.
    Bricker, D(1995). The Challenge of Inclusion. Journal of Early Intervention,
    19(3), 179-194.
    Briesch, A. M. & Chafouleas, S. M. (2009). Review and analysis of
    literature on self-management interventions to promote appropriate classroom behaviors (1988–2008). School Psychology Quarterly, 24(2), 106-118. doi: 10.1037/a0016159106
    Caldarella, P., Williams. L., Hansen, B. D., Wills. H. (2015). Managing student behavior with class-wide function-related intervention teams: An observational study in early elementary classrooms. Journal of Early Childhood Education, 43(5), 357-365. doi:10.1007/s10643-014-0664-3
    Carr, E. G., Levin, L., McConnachie, G., Carlson, J. I., Kemp, D. C., Smith, C. E., & Magito McLaughlin, D. (1999). Comprehensive multisituational intervention for problem behavior in the community: Long-term mainte- nance and social validation. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 1, 5–25.
    Carter, D.R., & Pool, J. L. (2012). Appropriate social behavior: Teaching expectations to young children. early childhood education, 40, 315-321. doi: 10.1007/s10643-012-0516-y
    Carter, D.R., & Norman, R. K.V.(2010). Class-wide positive behavior support in preschool: Improving teacher implementation through consultation. Early Childhood Education, 38 ,279–288.doi 10.1007/s10643-010-0409-x
    Chandler, L.K., Dahlquist, C.M., Repp, A. C., & Feltz, C. (1999). The effects of team-based functional assessment on the behavior of students in classroom settings. Exceptional Children, 66(1), 101-122.
    Chow, J.C. & Gilmour, A.F.(2016). Designing and implementing group contingencies in the classroom a teacher’s guide. Teaching Exceptional Children, 48(3), 137-143.
    Coelho, V., Cadima, J.,Pinto, A.L., & Guimarães C.(2019). Self-regulation,
    engagement, and developmental functioning in preschool-aged children. Journal of Early Intervention, 41(2) 105–124.
    Cole, C. L., & Bambara, L. M. (1992). Issues surrounding the use of self-management interventions in schools. School Psychology Review, 21, 193–201.
    Conklin, C. G., Kamps, D., Wills, H. (2016). The effects of Class-Wide Function-Related Intervention Teams (CW-FIT) on students’
    prosocial classroom behaviors. Journal of Behavioral Education, 26, 75-100. doi:10.1007/s10864-016-9252-5
    Conroy, M., Sutherland, K., Snyder, A., & Marsh, S.(2008). Classwide Interventions. Teaching Exceptional Children, 40, 24-30.
    Conklin.C.G.(2010) . The effects of Class-Wide Function-related Intervention
    Teams (CW-FIT) on students' prosocial classroom behaviors. University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas.
    Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., Heward, W. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Person.
    Coster, W., & Khetani, M. (2008). Measuring participation of children
    with disabilities: Issues and challenges. Disability and Rehabilitation, 30(8), 639-648. doi:10.1080/09638280701400375
    Division for Early Childhood, & National Association for the Education of Young Children. (2009). Early childhood inclusion:A joint position statement of the division for early childhood (DEC) and the National association for the education of young children (NAEYC). Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina, FPG Child Development Institute. Retrieved August 20, 2013, from http://www.naeyc.org/files/naeyc/file/positions/DEC_NAEYC_EC_updatedKS.pdf
    Dunst, C.J., Trivette, C.,Humphries, T., Raab, M., & Roper, N.(2001).Contrasting approaches to natural learning environment interventions. Infants and young children,14(2),48-63.
    Fox, L., Dunlap, G., Hemmeter, M., Louise, J., Gail, E., & Strain, P. S.(2003). The teaching pyramid: A model for supporting social competence and preventing challenging behavior in young children. Young Children, 58, 48–52.
    Gardner, W. I. & Cole, C. L. (1989). Self-management approaches. In E. Cipani Ed.), 7he Treatment of Severe Behaviour Disorders. Washington, DC: AMMR.
    Hester, P. P., Hendrickson, J. M., & Gable, R. A. (2009). Forty years later- The value of praise, ignoring, and rules for preschoolers at risk for behavior disorders. Education and Treatment of Children, 32, 513-535.
    Horn, E., Palmer, S., Butera, G., & Lieber, J. (2016). Six steps to inclusive preschool curriculum: A UDL-based framework for children’s school success. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
    Hundert, J. P. (2007). Training classroom and resource preschool teachers to develop inclusive intervention for children with disabilities: generalization to new intervention targets. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 9(3), 159-173.
    Hunt, P. F. (2011). Salamanca Statement and IDEA 2004: possibilities of
    practice for inclusive education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 15(4), 461-476. doi:10.1080/13603110903131713
    Jolstead, K. A., Caldarella, P., Hansen, B., Korth, B.B., Williams, L., & Joseph, G. E., & Strain, P. S. (2003). Comprehensive evidence-based social emotional curricula for young children: An analysis of efficacious adoption potential. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 23(2), 65–76.
    Jolstead, K.A., Caldarella, P., Hansen, B., Korth, B.B., Williams, L., Kamps, D. (2017). Implementing positive behavior support in preschools: An exploratory study of CW-FIT Tier 1. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions , 19(1), 48–60.
    Kamps, D., Conklin, C., & Wills, H. (2015). Use of self-management with the CW-FIT group contingency program. Education and Treatment of Children, 38(1), 1-32.
    Kamps, D., Wills, H., Dawson-Banner, H., Heitzman-Powell, L., Kottwitz,E., Hanson, B., & Fleming, K. (2015). Class-wide funtion-related intervention teams “CW-FIT”efficacy trail outcoms. Journal of Positive Behavior Intervention, 17,134-145.
    Kamps, D., Wills, H. P., Heitzman-Powell, L., Laylin, J., Szoke, C., Petrillo, T., et al. (2011). Class-wide function-related intervention teams: Effects of group contingency programs in urban classrooms. Journal of Positive
    Behavior Interventions, 13(3), 154–167. doi:10.1177/1098300711398935
    Kauffman, J. M. (1997). Characteristics of Emotional and Behavioral Disordrs of Children and Youth. NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Kazdin, A. E. (1977). Assessing the clinical or applied importance of behavior change through social validation. Behavior Modification, 1(4), 427–452.
    Kazdin, A. E., & Kendall, P. C. (1998). Current progress and future plans for developing effective treatments: Comments and perspectives. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 27, 217–226.
    Koegel, L. K., Koegel, R. L., & Dunlap, G. (1996). Positive behavioral support. Baltimore: Brookes.
    Kochhar, C. A., & West, L. L. (1996). Handbook for successful inclusion. Gaithersurg, MD: Aspen Publishers.
    Little, S. G., Akin-Little, A., & O’Neil, K.(2015). Group contingency interventions with children--1980-2010: A Meta-Analysis. Behavior Modification, 39(2) 322–341. doi: 10.1177/0145445514554393
    Mahon, D., Gunning, C., Holloway, J., & Lydon, H. (2020). Implementin positive behavior support within preschool settings: Group functional assessment and CW-FIT. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 22(3),167-180. doi:10.1177/1098300719890065
    Mcintyre, L., Gresham, F., Digennaro, F., & Reed, D. (2007). Treatment integrity of school-based interventions with children in the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1991-2005. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 659-672.
    National Association for the Education of Young Children. (2009). Early childhood inclusion. retrieved August 31, 2009,from https://doi.org/10.1177/1096250609344935
    Naylor,A.S.,Kamps,D.,Wills, H.(2018). The effects of the CW-FIT group contingency on Class-wide and individual behavior in an urban first grade classroom. Education and Treatment of Children. 41(1), 1-30.
    Noreau, L., Lepage, C., Boissiere, L., Picard, R., Fougeyrolla, P., Mathieu, J., Demarais, G., & Nadeau, L.(2007). Measuring partipation in children with disabilities using the assessment of life habit. Developmental Meficine and Child Neurology, 49(9),666-671.
    Odom, S.L.(2000). Preschool Inclusion: what we know and where we go from here. Early Childhood Special Education, 20(1), 20-27.
    Olive, M. L.(2004). Transitioning children between activities: effective strategies for decreasing challenging behavior. Beyond Behavior, 14(1), 11-16.
    Pokorski, E., Barton, E., & Ledford, J. (2016). A review of the use of group contingencies in preschool settings. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 36(4), 230–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121416649935
    Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., La Paro, K. M., Downer, J. T., & Pianta, R. C. (2005). The contribution of classroom setting and quality of instruction to children’s behavior in kindergartenclassrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 105,377–394.
    Schloss, P. J., & Smith, M. A. (1998). Appliedbehavior analysis in the classroom (2nd ed., pp. 289-311). Needham Heinghts,MA: Allyn and Bacon.
    Schwartz, I. S., & Baer, D. M. (1991). Social validity assessments: Is
    current practice state of the art? Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24(2), 189–204.
    Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (1998). Summarizing single-subject research: Issues and applications. Behavior Modification, 22, 221-242.
    Simonsen, B., & Myers, D.(2015). Classwide Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports: A Guide to Proactive Classroom Management. New York: The Guilford Press.
    Snell, M. E. (2005). Teacher's Guides to Inclusive Practices Collaborative Teaming. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
    Stormont, M. A., Smith, S. C., & Lewis, T.J.(2007). Teacher implementation of precorrection and praise statements in Head Start classrooms as a component of a program-wide system of positive behavior support.
    Journal of Behavioral Education, 16, 280-290. doi:10.1007/s10864-007-9040-3
    Sucuoğlu, N. B., Bayraklı, H., Karasu, F. İ., & Demir, Ş. (2017). The preschool classroom management and Inclusion in Turkey. International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education, 9(2).
    Sugai, G., & Horner, R. H. (2002). The evolution of discipline practices: School-wide positive behavior supports. Child and Family Behavior Therapy, 24, 23–50.
    Sugai, G., Honer, R.H., Dunlap, G., Hieneman, M., Lewis, T.J., Nelson, C.M., et al.(2000). Appling positive behavior support and functional behavior assessment in schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Intervention, 2, 131-143.
    Tawney, J.W., & Gast, L.D. (1984). Single subject research in special education. Columbus, Ohio: Merrill.
    Vaughn, S., Schumm, J.S., & Brick, J.B. (1993). Using a rating scale to design and evaluate Inclusion program. Teaching Exceptional Children, 30(1), 41- 45.
    Villa, R. A., & Thousand, J. S. (Eds.). (2005). Creating an inclusive school (pp1-11). ASCD.
    Wills, H. P., Iwaszuk, W. M., Kamps, D., & Shumate, E.(2014). CW-FIT: Group contingency effects across the day. Education & Treatment of Children, 37(2), 191-210.
    Will, H.P., Kamps, D., Hansen, B. D., Conklin, C., Bellinger, S., Neaderhiser, J. & Nsubuga, B. (2010). The classwide function-based intervention team program. Preventing School Failure:Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 54(3), 164-171.
    Wills, H.P., Kamps, D., Fleming, K., & Hansen, B. (2016). Student and teacher outcomes of the Class-Wide Function-Related intervention Team Efficacy Trial. Exceptional Children, 83(1), 58–76. doi: 10.1177/0014402916658658
    Wills, H., H.P., Wehby, J., Caldarella, P., Kamps, D., & Romine, R.S. (2018). Classroom management that works: A replication trial of the CW-FIT program. Exceptional Children, 84(4), 437–456.
    Zirpoli, T. J.(1995). Understanding and affecting the behavior of young children. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Merrill.
    Zoromoski, A. K., Owens, J. S., Evans, S. W., & Brady, C. E. (2015). Identifying ADHD symptoms most associated with impairment in early childhood, middlechildhood, and adolescence using teacher report. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 43(7), 1243–1255.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE