The future pipeline of workers, Generation Z (born in 1997 – 2012), is starting to emerge in the working industry, and leaders should pay close attention to them. Indonesian Gen Z constitutes the largest demographic group, occupying 27.94% of the total population. However, during the post-pandemic, Gen Z’s working behavior shifted to less commitment to the organization and lower performance. Several reasons are causing this phenomenon, such as an organization’s failure to forge genuine connections with its employees, lack of chances to learn and grow, and feelings of care. Therefore, this study focused on analyzing the relationship between empowering leadership, In-role behavior (IRB), organizational citizenship behavior-organization (OCBO), organizational citizenship behavior-individual (OCBI), and future work self-salience (FWSS) was proposed as the mediator between such relationship. Utilizing the online questionnaire distributed through purposive and snowball sampling, this study obtained 264 valid respondents from Indonesian Gen Z workers. The data were analyzed using IBM SPSS AMOS 26.0 software. The research findings confirmed that empowering leadership exhibits a significant positive influence on OCBO, OCBI, and FWSS but not on IRB. Also, a novel finding is that FWSS can influence IRB and OCBI significantly but not OCBO. Lastly, FWSS did not have any mediating effects between variables.

Aguas, M. J. (2019). Millennial and Generation Z’s perspectives on leadership effectiveness. Emerging Leadership Journeys, 13(1), 1–22.
Ahearne, M., Mathieu, J., & Rapp, A. (2005). To empower or not to empower your sales force? An empirical examination of the influence of leadership empowerment behavior on customer satisfaction and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 945–955. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.945
Ahmad, R., Ahmad, S., Islam, T., & Kaleem, A. (2020). The nexus of corporate social responsibility (CSR), affective commitment and organisational citizenship behaviour in academia. Employee Relations: The International Journal, 42(1), 232–247. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-04-2018-0105
Alavi, M., Visentin, D. C., Thapa, D. K., Hunt, G. E., Watson, R., & Cleary, M. (2020). Chi‐square for model fit in confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 76(9), 2209–2211. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14399
Alotaibi, S. M., Amin, M., & Winterton, J. (2020). Does emotional intelligence and empowering leadership affect psychological empowerment and work engagement? Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 41(8), 971–991. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-07-2020-0313
Alshaabani, A., Naz, F., Magda, R., & Rudnák, I. (2021). Impact of perceived organizational support on OCB in the time of COVID-19 pandemic in Hungary: Employee engagement and affective commitment as mediators. Sustainability, 13(14), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147800
Amundsen, S., & Martinsen, Ø. L. (2014). Empowering leadership: Construct clarification, conceptualization, and validation of a new scale. Leadership Quarterly, 25(3), 487–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.009
Atance, C. M., & O’Neill, D. K. (2001). Episodic future thinking. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(12), 533–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01804-0
Azimi, S., Andonova, Y., & Schewe, C. (2022). Closer together or further apart? Values of hero Generations Y and Z during crisis. Young Consumers, 23(2), 179–196. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-03-2021-1300
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
Bandura, A., & Locke, E. A. (2003). Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(1), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.87
Bassiouni, D. H., & Hackley, C. (2014). “Generation Z” children’s adaptation to digital consumer culture: A critical literature review. Journal of Customer Behaviour, 13(2), 113–133. https://doi.org/10.1362/147539214X14024779483591
Bateman, T. S., & Organ, D. W. (1983). Job satisfaction and the good soldier: The relationship between affect and employee “citizenship”. Academy of Management Journal, 26(4), 587–595. https://doi.org/10.2307/255908
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606.
Biemann, T., Kearney, E., & Marggraf, K. (2015). Empowering leadership and managers’ career perceptions: Examining effects at both the individual and the team level. Leadership Quarterly, 26(5), 775–789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.03.003
Blau, P. M. (2017). Exchange and power in social life. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203792643
Bolino, M. C. (1999). Citizenship and impression management: Good soldiers or good actors? The Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 82–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/259038
Bolino, M. C., Klotz, A. C., Turnley, W. H., & Harvey, J. (2013). Exploring the dark side of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(4), 542–559. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1847
Borman, W. C. (2004). The concept of organizational citizenship. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(6), 238–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00316.x
Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. M. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel Selection in Organizations (1st ed., pp. 71–98). Wiley.
Bowler, W. M., & Brass, D. J. (2006). Relational correlates of interpersonal citizenship behavior: A social network perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 70–82. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.70
Burker, W. W. (1986). Leadership as empowering others. In S. Srivastva (Ed.), Executive Power (pp. 51–77). Jossey-Bass.
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1994). Situational coping and coping dispositions in a stressful transaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(1), 184–195. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.66.1.184
Chicca, J., & Shellenbarger, T. (2018). Connecting with Generation Z: Approaches in nursing education. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 13(3), 180–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2018.03.008
Chillakuri, B. (2020). Understanding Generation Z expectations for effective onboarding. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 33(7), 1277–1296. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-02-2020-0058
Chillakuri, B., & Mahanandia, R. (2018). Generation Z entering the workforce: The need for sustainable strategies in maximizing their talent. Human Resource Management International Digest, 26(4), 34–38. https://doi.org/10.1108/HRMID-01-2018-0006
Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 89–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01203.x
Christine, M., Besart, A.-A., Cirera, A. X., Cruz, M., Davies, E., Grover, A., Iacovone, L., Kilinc, U., Medvedev, D., Maduko, F. O., Poupakis, S., Torres, J., & Tran, T. T. (2021). Unmasking the impact of covid-19 on businesses firm level evidence from across the world. http://www.worldbank.org/prwp.
Collier, J. E. (2020). Applied structural equation modeling using amos. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003018414
Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. The Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 471–482. https://doi.org/10.2307/258093
Cremers, E. E., & Curşeu, P. L. (2023). Empowering leadership during the COVID-19 outbreak: Implications for work satisfaction and effectiveness in organizational teams. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1095968
Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279602
Dangmei, J., & Singh, A. (2016). Understanding the Generation Z: The future workforce. South-Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies (SAJMS), 3, 2349–7858.
Destin, M., & Oyserman, D. (2010). Incentivizing education: Seeing schoolwork as an investment, not a chore. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(5), 846–849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.04.004
Dunkel, C. S., & Anthis, K. S. (2001). The role of possible selves in identity formation: A short-term longitudinal study. Journal of Adolescence, 24(6), 765–776. https://doi.org/10.1006/jado.2001.0433
Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1040–1048. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040
Dyne, L. Van, Graham, J. W., & Dienesch, R. M. (1994). Organizational citizenship behavior: Construct redefinition, measurement, and validation. The Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), 765–802. https://www.jstor.org/stable/256600
Eagly, A. H., Makhijani, M. G., & Klonsky, B. G. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.111.1.3
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
Fugate, M., Kinicki, A. J., & Ashforth, B. E. (2004). Employability: A psycho-social construct, its dimensions, and applications. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65(1), 14–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2003.10.005
Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. V. (1997). Meta-Analytic review of leader–member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6), 827–844. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.6.827
Goldring, D., & Azab, C. (2021). New rules of social media shopping: Personality differences of U.S. Gen Z versus Gen X market mavens. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 20(4), 884–897. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1893
Götz, M., Donzallaz, M., & Jonas, K. (2020). Leader–Member exchange fosters beneficial and prevents detrimental workplace behavior: Organizational identification as the linking pin. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01788
Groth, M. (2005). Customers as good soldiers: Examining citizenship behaviors in internet service deliveries. Journal of Management, 31(1), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206304271375
Grow, J. M., & Yang, S. (2018). Generation-Z enters the advertising workplace: Expectations through a gendered lens. Journal of Advertising Education, 22(1), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098048218768595
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage.
Hamouche, S., Koritos, C., & Papastathopoulos, A. (2023). Quiet quitting: Relationship with other concepts and implications for tourism and hospitality. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 35(12), 4297–4312. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-11-2022-1362
Harari, T. T., Sela, Y., & Bareket-Bojmel, L. (2023). Gen Z during the COVID-19 crisis: A comparative analysis of the differences between Gen Z and Gen X in resilience, values and attitudes. Current Psychology, 42(28), 24223–24232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03501-4
Hassan, S., Mahsud, R., Yukl, G., & Prussia, G. E. (2013). Ethical and empowering leadership and leader effectiveness. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 28(2), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683941311300252
Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.21427/D7CF7R
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Humborstad, S. I. W., Nerstad, C. G. L., & Dysvik, A. (2014). Empowering leadership, employee goal orientations and work performance: A competing hypothesis approach. Personnel Review, 43(2), 246–271. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-01-2012-0008
Ibarra, H. (1999). Provisional selves: Experimenting with image and identity in professional adaptation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 764–791. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667055
Iorgulescu, M.-C. (2016). Generation Z and its perception of work case study. Cross-Cultural Management Journal, 18(1), 47–54.
Ismail, A. R., Nguyen, B., Chen, J., Melewar, T. C., & Mohamad, B. (2020). Brand engagement in self-concept (BESC), value consciousness and brand loyalty: A study of Generation Z consumers in Malaysia. Young Consumers, 22(1), 112–130. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-07-2019-1017
Jada, U. R., & Mukhopadhyay, S. (2019). Empowering leadership and LMX as the mediators between leader’s personality traits and constructive voice behavior. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 27(1), 74–93. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-09-2017-1232
Jayathilake, H. D., Daud, D., Eaw, H. C., & Annuar, N. (2021). Employee development and retention of Generation-Z employees in the post-COVID-19 workplace: A conceptual framework. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 28(7), 2343–2364. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-06-2020-0311
Jiang, M., Wang, H., & Li, M. (2019). Linking empowering leadership and organizational citizenship behavior toward environment: The role of psychological ownership and future time perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02612
Karoly, P. (1993). Mechanisms of self-regulation: A systems view. Annual Review of Psychology, 44(1), 23–52. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.44.020193.000323
Katz, D. (1964). The motivational basis of organizational behavior. Behavioral Science, 9(2), 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830090206
Kaushik, M., & Guleria, N. (2020). The impact of pandemic COVID -19 in workplace. European Journal of Business and Management, 12(15), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.7176/EJBM/12-15-02
Kim, M., Beehr, T. A., & Prewett, M. S. (2018). Employee responses to empowering leadership: A meta-analysis. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 25(3), 257–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051817750538
Koekemoer, L., de Beer, L. T., Govender, K., & Brouwers, M. (2021). Leadership behaviour, team effectiveness, technological flexibility, work engagement and performance during COVID-19 lockdown: An exploratory study. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 47, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v47i0.1829
Kosslyn, S. M. (1987). Seeing and imagining in the cerebral hemispheres: A computational approach. Psychological Review, 94(2), 148–175. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.94.2.148
Kwak, W. J., & Jackson, C. L. (2015). Relationship building in empowering leadership processes: A test of mediation and moderation. Journal of Management & Organization, 21(4), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2015.11
Lawler, E. E. (1986). High-involvement management: Participative strategies for improving organizational performance. Wiley. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=h_7SAAAAIAAJ
Leach, D. J., Wall, T. D., & Jackson, P. R. (2003). The effect of empowerment on job knowledge: An empirical test involving operators of complex technology. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76(1), 27–52. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317903321208871
Leary, M. R., & Kowalski, R. M. (1990). Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. Psychological Bulletin, 107(1), 34–47. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.1.34
Lee, M., & Koh, J. (2001). Is empowerment really a new concept? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 12(4), 684–695. https://doi.org/10.1080/713769649
Liden, R. C., Sparrowe, R. T., & Wayne, S. (1997). Leader-member exchange theory: The past and potential for the future. In G. R. Ferris (Ed.), Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management (Vol. 15, pp. 47–119). Elsevier Science/JAI Press.
Lin, W., Wang, L., Bamberger, P. A., Zhang, Q., Wang, H., Guo, W., Shi, J., & Zhang, T. (2016). Leading future orientations for current effectiveness: The role of engagement and supervisor coaching in linking future work self salience to job performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 92, 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.12.002
London, M. (1983). Toward a theory of career motivation. The Academy of Management Review, 8(4), 620–630.
Lorinkova, N. M., & Perry, S. J. (2017). When is empowerment effective? The role of leader-leader exchange in empowering leadership, cynicism, and time theft. Journal of Management, 43(5), 1631–1654. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314560411
Lu, W. C. (2020). Future work-self salience and proactive career behavior among college student-athletes in Taiwan: A career construction model of adaptation. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 27, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2020.100259
Magano, J., Silva, C., Figueiredo, C., Vitória, A., Nogueira, T., & Dinis, M. A. P. (2020). Generation Z: Fitting project management soft skills competencies—A mixed-method approach. Education Sciences, 10(7), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10070187
Mahand, T., & Caldwell, C. (2023). Quiet quitting – causes and opportunities. Business and Management Research, 12(1), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.5430/bmr.v12n1p9
Manz, C. C., & Sims, H. P. (1987). Leading workers to lead themselves: The external leadership of self- managing work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32(1), 106–128. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392745
Manz, C. C., & Sims, H. P. (1991). Superleadership: Beyond the myth of heroic leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 19(4), 18–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(91)90051-A
Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41(9), 954–969. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.9.954
Martin, S. L., Liao, H., & Campbell, E. M. (2013). Directive versus empowering leadership: A field experiment comparing impacts on task proficiency and proactivity. Academy of Management Journal, 56(5), 1372–1395. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0113
Matta, F. K., Scott, B. A., Koopman, J., & Conlon, D. E. (2015). Does seeing “eye to eye” affect work engagement and organizational citizenship behavior? A role theory perspective on LMX agreement. Academy of Management Journal, 58(6), 1686–1708. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0106
Mills, P. K., & Ungson, G. R. (2003). Reassessing the limits of structural empowerment: Organizational constitution and trust as controls. The Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 143–153. https://doi.org/10.2307/30040694
Morrison, E. W. (1994). Role definitions and organizational citizenship behavior: The importance of the employee’s perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 37(6), 1543–1567. https://doi.org/10.2307/256798
Motowidlo, S. J., & Van Scotter, J. R. (1994). Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 475–480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.4.475
Nguyen Ngoc, T., Viet Dung, M., Rowley, C., & Pejić Bach, M. (2022). Generation Z job seekers’ expectations and their job pursuit intention: Evidence from transition and emerging economy. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 14, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/18479790221112548
O’Reilly, C. A., & Chatman, J. (1986). Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 492–499. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.492
Orgambídez, A., & Almeida, H. (2020). Exploring the link between structural empowerment and job satisfaction through the mediating effect of role stress: A cross-sectional questionnaire study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 109, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103672
Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington Books/D. C. Heath and Com.
Organ, D. W. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior: It’s construct clean-up time. Human Performance, 10(2), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1002_2
Organ, D. W., & Moorman, R. H. (1993). Fairness and organizational citizenship behavior: What are the connections? Social Justice Research, 6(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048730
Organ, D. W., & Ryan, K. (1995). A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 48(4), 775–802. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01781.x
Oyserman, D., & James, L. (2011). Possible identities. In Handbook of Identity Theory and Research (pp. 117–145). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7988-9_6
Padayachee, K. (2017). The myths and realities of generational cohort theory on ICT integration in education: A South African perspective. The African Journal of Information Systems, 10(1), 54–84.
Parker, S. K., & Collins, C. G. (2010). Taking stock: Integrating and differentiating multiple proactive behaviors. Journal of Management, 36(3), 633–662. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308321554
Peterson, C. (2000). The future of optimism. American Psychologist, 55(1), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.44
Pichler, S., Kohli, C., & Granitz, N. (2021). Ditto for Gen Z: A framework for leveraging the uniqueness of the new generation. Business Horizons, 64(5), 599–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2021.02.021
Piercy, N. F., Cravens, D. W., Lane, N., & Vorhies, D. W. (2006). Driving organizational citizenship behaviors and salesperson in-role behavior performance: The role of management control and perceived organizational support. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 244–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070305280532
Pituch, K. A., & Stevens, J. P. (2015). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315814919
Podsakoff, N. P., Whiting, S. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & Blume, B. D. (2009). Individual- and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 122–141. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013079
Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (1997). Impact of organizational citizenship behavior on organizational performance: A review and suggestion for future research. Human Performance, 10(2), 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1002_5
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 1(2), 107–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(90)90009-7
Pradhan, A., & Mishra, S. (2020). Workplace attachment as a mediator of organizational tenure and organizational citizenship behavior. Jindal Journal of Business Research, 9(2), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/2278682120969032
Purwanto, A. (2022). The role of transformational leadership and organizational citizenship behavior on SMEs employee performance. Journal of Industrial Engineering & Management Research, 3(5), 39–45. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7777/jiemar.v3i5.318
Raub, S., & Robert, C. (2010). Differential effects of empowering leadership on in-role and extra-role employee behaviors: Exploring the role of psychological empowerment and power values. Human Relations, 63(11), 1743–1770. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726710365092
Rumbaut, R. G. (2004). Ages, life stages, and generational cohorts: Decomposing the immigrant first and second generations in the United States. International Migration Review, 38(3), 1160–1205. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2004.tb00232.x
Ruvolo, A. P., & Markus, H. R. (1992). Possible selves and performance: The power of self-relevant imagery. Social Cognition, 10(1), 95–124. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.1992.10.1.95
Said, R. A., Rashid, M. A. A., & Othman, M. A. (2020). Generation Z for job employment: Characteristic and expectation. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(3), 570–575. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v10-i3/7072
Schewe, C. D., & Meredith, G. (2004). Segmenting global markets by generational cohorts: Determining motivations by age. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 4(1), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.157
Scheyett, A. (2022). Quiet quitting. Social Work, 68(1), 5–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swac051
Scholz, T. M., & Vyugina, D. (2019). Looking into the future: What we are expecting from Generation Z. In Generations Z in Europe (pp. 277–284). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78973-491-120191021
Schroth, H. (2019). Are you ready for Gen Z in the workplace? California Management Review, 61(3), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619841006
Shahab, M. A., Sobari, A., & Udin, U. (2018). Empowering leadership and organizational citizenship behavior: The mediating roles of psychological empowerment and emotional intelligence in medical service industry. International Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 6(3), 80–91.
Shragay, D., & Tziner, A. (2011). The generational effect on the relationship between job involvement, work satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behavior. Revista de Psicologia Del Trabajo y de Las Organizaciones, 27(2), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.5093/tr2011v27n2a6
Silva, R., Azevedo, A., & Farhangmehr, M. (2021). Consumers’ proneness to value corporate social responsibility as predictor of extra-role and intra-role behaviors. Social Responsibility Journal, 17(2), 164–180. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-10-2017-0214
Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological, empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442–1465. https://doi.org/10.2307/256865
Statista Research Department. (2023). Share of Indonesian population in 2020, by generation. In Statista.
Strauss, K., Griffin, M. A., & Parker, S. K. (2012). Future work selves: How salient hoped-for identities motivate proactive career behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 580–598. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026423
Strobel, M., Tumasjan, A., Spörrle, M., & Welpe, I. M. (2013). The future starts today, not tomorrow: How future focus promotes organizational citizenship behaviors. Human Relations, 66(6), 829–856. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726712470709
Sugianingrat, I. A. P. W., Rini Widyawati, S., Alexandra de Jesus da Costa, C., Ximenes, M., Dos Reis Piedade, S., & Gede Sarmawa, W. (2019). The employee engagement and OCB as mediating on employee performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 68(2), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-03-2018-0124
Sun, H. J., & Yoon, H. H. (2022). Linking organizational virtuousness, engagement, and organizational citizenship behavior: The moderating role of individual and organizational factors. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research, 46(5), 879–904. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348020963701
Szymkowiak, A., Melović, B., Dabić, M., Jeganathan, K., & Kundi, G. S. (2021). Information technology and Gen Z: The role of teachers, the internet, and technology in the education of young people. Technology in Society, 65, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101565
Taber, B. J., & Blankemeyer, M. (2015). Future work self and career adaptability in the prediction of proactive career behaviors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 86, 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2014.10.005
Taibah, D., & Ho, T. C. F. (2023). The moderating effect of flexible work option on structural empowerment and Generation Z contextual performance. Behavioral Sciences, 13(3), 266–280. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13030266
Tang, G., Chen, Y., van Knippenberg, D., & Yu, B. (2020). Antecedents and consequences of empowering leadership: Leader power distance, leader perception of team capability, and team innovation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 41(6), 551–566. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2449
Thomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An “Interpretive” model of intrinsic task motivation. The Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 666–681. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/258687
Turner, A. (2015). Generation Z: Technology and social interest. The Journal of Individual Psychology, 71(2), 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1353/jip.2015.0021
Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, S. M. (2008). Generational differences in psychological traits and their impact on the workplace. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(8), 862–877. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940810904367
Van Dyne, L., & Ang, S. (1998). Organizational citizenship behavior of contingent workers in Singapore. Academy of Management Journal, 41(6), 692–703. https://doi.org/10.2307/256965
Van Dyne, L., Vandewalle, D., Kostova, T., Latham, M. E., & Cummings, L. L. (2000). Collectivism, propensity to trust and self-esteem as predictors of organizational citizenship in a non-work setting. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(200002)21:1<3::AID-JOB47>3.0.CO;2-6
Vancouver, J. B., & Day, D. V. (2005). Industrial and organisation research on self-regulation: From constructs to applications. Applied Psychology, 54(2), 155–185. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2005.00202.x
Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (2000). Perspectives on models of job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8(4), 216–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2389.00151
Wang, H., Zhang, Y., Li, P., & Henry, S. E. (2023). You raise me up and I reciprocate: Linking empowering leadership to organizational citizenship behavior and unethical pro-organizational behavior. Applied Psychology, 72(2), 718–742. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12398
Wiedmer, T. L. (2015). Generations do differ: Best practices in leading traditionalists, boomers, and Generations X, Y, and Z. The Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 82, 51.
Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17(3), 601–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700305
Wongleedee, K. (2020). Turnover intention and abusive supervision and management: Investigating the role of self-identity and future work self-salience. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy, 11(1), 462–471. https://doi.org/10.5530/srp.2020.1.58
Xiao, Y., He, Y., Gao, X., Lu, L., & Yu, X. (2021). Career exploration and college students’ career adaptability: The mediating role of future work self-salience and moderating role of perceived teacher support. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2021, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/3532239
Yin, W., & Liu, S. (2022). The relationship between empowering leadership and radical creativity. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1002356
Yu, K., Lin, W., Wang, L., Ma, J., Wei, W., Wang, H., Guo, W., & Shi, J. (2016). The role of affective commitment and future work self salience in the abusive supervision-job performance relationship. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 89(1), 28–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12101
Zhang, S., Ke, X., Frank Wang, X. H., & Liu, J. (2018). Empowering leadership and employee creativity: A dual-mechanism perspective. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 91(4), 896–917. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12219
Zhang, X., & Bartol, K. M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 107–128. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.48037118