本研究目的在探討使用心智圖筆記對學生創造性思考及科學學習成就之影響。研究採準實驗設計，對象為台中市某國小五年級學生六個班級，合計187人。六個班級隨機分派三組，分別為心智圖筆記組、條列式筆記組、不使用筆記組。心智圖筆記組學生在植物世界單元授課前，接受為期十週心智圖繪圖訓練。在植物單元教學前後施測「陶倫斯圖形版創造性思考測驗」及「學習成就測驗」，從共變數分析及變異數分析結果發現，在創造性思考測驗中「流暢」、「獨創」及「開放」向度 (p < .01)；學習成就測驗中「記憶」、「應用」及「分析」向度，心智圖筆記組學生表現優於其他兩組 (p < .05)。從心智圖學習情形調查表中得知，71% 學生接受心智圖做筆記的學習方式，57% 學生願意在未來學習活動中繼續使用心智圖筆記。學生的心智圖筆記則呈現學生對於植物構造與功能的整體了解。最後，研究者建議在一般自然科學課程教學中，學生運用心智圖做筆記，以提昇學生學習成就表現，及促進其創造思考能力。未來研究則可再進一步發展運用心智圖筆記培養學生進行科學寫作歷程。

This study aimed to explore the impact of note-taking by utilizing mind mapping strategy on students’ creative thinking and science achievement. This study applied quasi-experimental design. The participants were 187 5th graders from six classes. The six classes were randomly assigned to three groups- Mind Mapping group, Conventional note-taking group, and Control group. Students in Mind Mapping group practiced the strategy for ten weeks before the Plant World unit. Students’ measures on “the Torrance Test of Creative Thinking” and “the Achievement Test of Plants Concept” were collected before and after the unit. From the ANOVA and ANCOVA on gained Torrance test scores and science achievement scores, we found that Mind Mapping group outperformed the other two groups on scales of Fluency, Originality, and Resistance to Premature Closure in the Torrance test (p < .01) and Knowledge, Application and Analysis scales in the science achievement test (p < .05). Seventy-one percents of students self-reported that they accept the learning style of taking mind mapping notes, and fifty-seven percents of students are willing to using mind mapping strategy in their future learning activities. Students illustrate their understanding of structure & function of plants in their mind mapping notes. Finally, it is suggested that students can take mind mapping notes in general science curriculum, in order to promote their performance of achievement, as well as their creative thinking. We also could apply mind mapping notes to develop the process of science writing further in the future.

中文部分
朱長超 (2004): 創新思維: 發現新機，敲開成功之門。臺北市: 倚天文化出版。
余民寧 (1997): 有意義的學習—概念構圖之研究。台北市: 商鼎文化出版社。
余民寧 (2003): 教育測驗與評量—成就測驗與教學評量。台北市: 心理出版社。
李坤崇 (2001): 國民中小學新舊課程銜接理念。台北市: 教育部。
吳靜吉、高泉豐、王敬仁、丁興祥 (1981a): 拓弄斯語文創造思考測驗（甲式）指導及研究手冊。台北市: 遠流出版社。
吳靜吉、高泉豐、王敬仁、丁興祥 (1981b): 拓弄斯語文創造思考測驗（乙式）指導及研究手冊。台北市: 遠流出版社。
汪慶雲 (2005): 心智圖教學方案對國小學生自然領域學習態度與成就影響之研究。台北市: 國立臺灣師範大學碩士論文 (未出版) 。
林幸台、王木榮 (1994): 威廉斯創造力測驗指導手冊。台北: 心理出版社。
林惠珠 (2006): 心智繪圖融入國中自然科教學之行動研究。花蓮縣: 國立東華大學碩士論文 (未出版) 。
林嘉玲 (2003): 七年級學生健康與體育相關概念之行動研究。台中市: 國立體育學院碩士論文 (未出版) 。
林曉雯 (2003): 學生對「開花植物生長與發育」概念之瞭解。師大學報, 48(1), 47-62.
洪文東 (2002): 創造型兒童之思考特性與科學創造力的關聯性。屏東師院學報, 16(3), 355-394。
常雅珍 (2005): 全腦開發記憶策略與實務。台北市: 心理出版社。
陳永隆、葉鳳如 (2007): 解開ＫＭ成功密碼─邁向ＫＭ３.０。台北市:中國生產力中心。
教育部 (2002): 創造力教育白皮書。台北市: 教育部。
教育部 (2003): 國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。台北市: 教育部。
張世彗 (2007): 創造力：理論、技法與教學。台北市: 五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
張春興 (1996): 教育心理學。臺北市: 東華出版社。
張寶連 (2001): 中小學學生植物形態概念研究。國科會專題研究報告(編號: NSC89-2511-S-415-004)。
游姮茹 (2005): 心智圖法提升創造性問題解決能力之探究。高雄市: 國立高雄師範大學碩士論文 (未出版) 。
黃正傑 (1997): 教學原理。台北市: 師大書苑。
黃玉佳(2003): 概念構圖與摘要策略對不同性別學生學習成效之影響。台南市: 國立成功大學碩士論文 (未出版) 。
黃玉琪 (2006): 自然科心智圖法創造思考教學方案對國小學生創造力與自然科學業成就之影響研究。台北市: 台北市立教育大學碩士論文 (未出版) 。
廖春文 (2001): 九年一貫統整課程：理念與設計實例。台北市: 五南出版社。
蔡天民 (2001): 概念構圖對國小學童自然科學習成就、學習態度及概念改變之研究。台北市: 台北市立師範學院碩士論文 (未出版) 。
蔡文山 (2006): 心智圖教學方案對國小五年級學生創造力、學習成就、學習動機之影響—以自然與生活科技領域為例。嘉義市: 國立嘉義大學博士論文 (未出版) 。
錢秀梅 (2001): 心智圖教學方案對身心障礙資源班學生創造力影響。台北市: 國立臺北師範學院碩士論文 (未出版) 。
魏靜雯 (2003): 心智繪圖與摘要教學對國小五年級學生閱讀理解與摘要能力之影響。台北市: 國立臺灣師範大學碩士論文 (未出版) 。
羅玲妃譯 (1998): 心智繪圖—思想整合利器。台北市: 一智出版社。
Buzan, T. & Buzen, B. 著; 孫易新譯 (2007) : 心智圖聖經－心智圖法理論與實物篇。台北市: 耶魯國際文化事業有限公司。
Buzan, T. 著; 陳素宜，孫易新合譯 (2003): 心智魔法師－大腦使用手冊。台北市: 耶魯國際文化事業有限公司。
Gelb, M. 著; 劉蘊芳譯 (1999): 7 Brains：怎樣擁有達文西的七種天才。台北市: 大塊文化出版社。
Torrance, E. P., Ball, O. E. & Safter, T. 編制; 李乙明修訂 (2006): 陶倫斯創造思考測驗圖形版－指導手冊。台北市: 心理出版社。

英文部分
Akinoglu, O., & Yasar, Z. (2007). The effects of note taking in science education through the mind mapping technique on students’ attitudes, achievement and concept learning. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 6(3), 34-43.
Atkin, J. M., & Black, P. (2003). Inside science education reform: A history of curricular and policy change. New York: Teachers College Press.
Austin, L. J., Lee, M., & Carr, P. J. (2004). The effects of guided notes on undergraduate students' recording of lecture content. Joumal of Instructional Psychology, 31(4), 314-319.
Austin, L. J., Lee, G. M., Thibeault, D. M., Carr, E. J., & Bailey, B. J. (2002). Effects of guided notes on university students’ responding and recall of information. Journal of Behavioral Education, 11(4), 243-254.
Beeson, A. S. (1996). The effect of writing after reading on college nursing students' factual knowledge and synthesis of knowledge. Journal of Nursing Education, 35(6), 258-63.
Bell, B., Jones, A., & Carr, M. (1995). The development of the recent national New Zealand science curriculum. Studies in Science Education, 26(1), 73-105.
Brown, R. (2005). Seventh-graders' self-regulatory note-taking from text: Perceptions, preferences, and practices. Reading Research and Instruction, 44(4), 1-26.
Buzan, T. (1996). The mind map book: How to use radiant thinking to maximize your brain's untapped potential. New York: Plume.
Cohen, J. (1997). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Association.
Collins, A. (1995). National science education standards in the United States: A process and a product. Studies in Science Education, 26(1), 7-37.
Eppler, J. M. (2006). A comparison between concept maps, mind maps, conceptual diagrams, and visual metaphors as complementary tools for knowledge construction and sharing. Information Visualization, 5(3), 202 –210.
Farrand, P., Hussain, F., & Hennessy, E. (2002). The efficacy of the ‘mind map’ study technique. Medical Education, 36(5), 426–431.
Goodnough, K., & Woods, R. (2002). Student and teacher perceptions of mind mapping: A middle school case study. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED470970)
Gordon, J. L. (2000). Creating knowledge structure maps to support explicit knowledge management. Applied Knowledge Research Institute, 34-48.
Guilford, J. P. (1986). Creative talents: Their nature, uses and development. New York: Bearly.
Haigh, M. (2007). Can investigative practical work in high school biology foster creativity? Research of Science Education, 37(2), 123-140.
Katayama, D. A., & Robinson H. D. (2000). Getting students "partially" involved in note-taking using graphic organizers. The Journal of Experimental Education, 68(2), 119-33.
Kiewra, K. A. (1989). A review of note-taking: The encoding-storage par, adigi and beyond. Educational Psychology Review, 2, 147-172.
Kiewra, A. K., Mayer, E. R., Dubois, F. N., Christensen M., Kim S., & Risch, N. (1997). Effects of advance organizers and repeated presentations on students' learning. The Journal of Experimental Education, 65(2), 147- 59.
Kiewra, A. K. (2002). How classroom teachers can help students learn and teach them how to learn. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 71-80.
Lee, P., Lan, W., Hamman, D., & Hendricks, B. (2008). The effects of teaching notetaking strategies on elementary students’ science learning. Instructional Science, 36(2), 191–201.
Massoudi, M. (2003). Can scientific writing be creative? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 12(2), 115-128.
McClain, A. (1986). Improving lectures: Challenge both sides of the brain. Paper presented at the National Conference of the Association of Optometric Contact Lens Educators. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED274954)
Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Robinson, H. D., Katayama, D. A., Beth, A., Odom, S., Hsieh, Y., & Vanderveen, A.(2006). Increasing text comprehension and graphic note taking using a partial graphic organizer. The Journal of Educational Research, 100(2), 103-111.
Saez, M., & Carretero, A. (1998). Innovations in the Spanish science curriculum: A view of a systemic reform. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 30(6), 719-738.
Sperry, W. R. (1975). Left-brain, right-brain. Saturday Review, 23(2), 30-33.
Sutherland, P., Badger, R., & White, G. (2002). How new students take notes at lectures. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 26(4), 377-388.
Torrance, E. P. (1979). The search for satori and creativity. Buffalo, NY: Bearly Limited.
Torrance, E. P., Ball, O. E., & Safter, T. (1992). Torrance tests of creative thinking: Stresmlined scoring guide figural a and b. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.