本研究旨在探究創造力行為模式與創造力成分理論的潛在變因：行為態度、過去行為、預期情緒、行為意圖、創意動機、領域知能與創造力知能，是否能對高中生工程設計創意表現具有實質影響。本研究對象為240位高中生進行立意取樣問卷調查，以理論推導來建構本研究「高中生工程設計創意表現之結果評估模型」，並以結構方程模型為研究工具分析工程設計創意表現之學習結果相關影響因素與路徑關係。
本研究結論如下：（一）已探究出創造力行為模式與高中生工程設計創意表現之結構方程模型，其中過去行為對行為態度、行為意圖與創意表現均有顯著影響，行為態度與預期情緒對行為意圖有顯著影響，惟行為意圖並未如預期對創意表現之影響達顯著水準，另預期情緒對創造力成分理論的創意動機有顯著影響；（二）已探究出創造力成分理論式與高中生工程設計創意表現之結構方程模型；其中創意動機對領域知能、創造力知能與創意表現均有顯著影響，領域知能與創造力知能並未如預期對創意表現之影響達顯著水準；（三）透過結構方程模式分析建立本研究模型，並分析各變項間所有路徑關係，模型非完全符合預期假設，但仍可建立本研究之基本架構模式。

This study aimed to explore the potential factors of creative behavior patterns and creative component patterns: behavioral attitude, past behavioral experiences, anticipated emotions, behavioral intention, creative motivation, domain knowledge, and creative intelligence. The study investigated whether these factors have a substantial impact on high school students’ creative performance in engineering design. A purposive sampling questionnaire survey was conducted among students in regular senior high schools offering life technology courses. The study included 240 regular high school students with the purpose of identifying the factors influencing high school students' creative expressions in engineering design. The study constructed the “Outcome Assessment Model for High School Students' Creative Expressions in Engineering Design” based on theoretical deduction. Structural equation modeling was used as a research tool to analyze the relevant influencing factors and path relationships related to learning outcomes in engineering design creativity.
The conclusions of this study were as follows: (1) A structural equation model for creative behavior and high school students’ creative expressions in engineering design had been explored. Past behavior significantly influenced behavioral attitude, behavioral intention, and design performance. Behavioral attitude and anticipated emotions had a significant impact on behavioral intention. However, the expected influence of behavioral intention on design performance did not reach a significant level. Additionally, anticipated emotions significantly affected the creative motivation in the creative component pattern model. (2) Structural euation modeling（SEM）for the model of the componential theory of creativity and high school students’ creative expressions in engineering design had been explored. Creative motivation significantly influenced domain knowledge, creative intelligence, and design performance. However, domain knowledge and creative intelligence did not reach a significant level of influence on design performance as expected. (3) The structural equation modeling analysis established the basic framework model of this study, although the model did not completely conform to the expected assumptions.

壹、中文部份
丁奕璇（2021）。行動學習繼續使用意圖之研究─以目標導向行為模型為應用[未出版之博士論文]。國立中興大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/7f8b28
于承平（2022）。21世紀能力發展之理念與規劃。學校行政雙月刊，138，150-178。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh?docid=16068300-202203-202204010009-202204010009-150-178
毛連塭（1984）。台北市國民小學推展創造性教學研討會結論報告—創造性教學資料彙編。台北市教師研習中心。
毛連塭、郭有遹、陳龍安、林幸台（2000）。創造力研究。心理。
王俊人、高俊雄、劉吉川。（2010）。休閒事業行銷管理。華都。
王保堤、游光昭、王鼎銘（2006）。設計導向課程對學生科技創造力影響之研究。新竹教育大學學報，22，77-103。https://doi.org/10.7044/NHCUE.200606.0077
王若樸（2021）。科技部揭2021年四大科技政策方向，透露考慮設嘉義和屏東軟體科學園區。 https://www.ithome.com.tw/news/142202
朱敬先（1997）。教育心理學：教學取向。五南。
朱敬先（2000）。教育心理學。五南。
行政院（2019）。關於科技部-重大政策。https://www.most.gov.tw/folksonomy/list/5a81d473-cbed-4827-acec-b9391202353e?l=ch
行政院（2021）。前瞻基礎建設計畫—奠定未來30年國家發展根基。https://www.ey.gov.tw/Page/5A8A0CB5B41DA11E/9cf2eef1-e2d2-4f37-ba6e-9498deb422b4
何宜玲（2006）。影響高職電機電子群低入學成績而高學業成就表現學生之因素探討-----以台北市立松山工農為例[未出版之博士論文]。國立臺灣師範大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/6fqps4
余安邦（1990）。成就動機的建構效度研究[未出版之博士論文]。國立台灣大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/jhh9uw
余安邦、楊國樞（1991）。成就動機本土化的省思。載於楊中芳、高尚仁（合編），中國人，中國心-人格與社會篇，201-290。遠流。
余宗龍、賴政豪（2020）。職業棒球比賽現場觀賞行為意圖之影響因素：目標導向行為模式觀點。戶外遊憩研究，33(1)，115-149。
吳文龍、黃萬居（2007）。自然科創意與批判思考教學對國小學生創意動機、批判思考及科學創造力之研究。科學教育月刊，304，12-28。 https://doi.org/10.6216/SEM.200711_(304).0002
吳佩羿、劉曉芬、林志哲。（2022）。國中生數學學習興趣、學習情緒、學習投入與學習成就之關係。教育與心理研究，45(2)，87-116。
吳明隆、涂金堂（2009）。SPSS與統計應用分析（修訂版）。五南。
吳靜吉、丁興祥、邱皓政（2002）。創造力的發展與實踐。應用心理研究，15，15-16。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh?DocID=15609251-200209-x-15-15-16-a&PublishTypeID=P001
吳靜吉、程炳林（1992）。激勵的學習策略量表之修訂。測驗年刊，39，54-78。
邱皓政（2004）。社會與行為科學的量化研究與統計分析。五南。
巫俊采（2022）。結合團隊導向學習與實務學習體驗之教學實踐研究。 教學實踐與創新，5(2)，053-110。 https://doi.org/10.53106/261654492022090502002
李大偉、張玉山（2000a）。科技創造力的意涵與教學（上）。生活科技教育月刊，33(9)，9-16。https://doi.org/10.6232/LTE.2000.33(9).3
李大偉、張玉山（2000b）。科技創造力的意涵與教學（下）。生活科技教育月刊，33(10)，7-15。https://doi.org/10.6232/LTE.2000.33(10).3
李大偉、張玉山、張育禎（2006）。企業體驗式的科技創造力教學設計實例。生活科技教育月刊，39(8)，3-20。http://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw:8080/server/api/core/bitstreams/a5c32390-e439-4fb5-967a-3e6cfc0040eb/content
李金泉（1993）。非同步式網路輔助教學之研究─以技職校院工業安全課程為例[未出版之博士論文]。彰化師範大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/4b73g9
李金泉（2010）。易學易用SPSS PASW統計分析實務。全華圖書。
林建妤（2004）。創意自我效能與預期評量對內在動機、創造力之影響的實驗研究[未出版之博士論文]。國立交通大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/358nq8
林建志（2009）。TRIZ設計教學對高中學生產品創新影響之研究[未出版之碩士論文]。國立臺灣師範大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/yvwe3s
林晏瑛（2022）。國中生考試愉悅歷程模式之驗證與分析。教育心理學報，53(4)，923-948。 https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.202206_53(4).0007
林崇德（1995）。高中生心理學。五南。
林清同、葉子明、鄭美圓。（2013）。高齡者使用虛擬實境體感遊戲之行為意圖研究-以過去經驗為干擾變項。運動與遊憩研究，8(2)， 1-19。 https://doi.org/10.29423/JSRR.201312_8(2).0001
施心韻（2008）。彰化縣國民小學教師對綜合活動學習領域課程本質認知與落實情形之研究[未出版之博士論文]。國立臺中教育大學。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/br29a3
施振榮（2000）。創新的6種型式：創新決定競爭力。大塊文化。
洪榮昭（1999）。試析科技創作力。國際科技教育整合思考研討會，專題研討論文集，43-50。
洪榮昭（2001）。PBL教學策略。技術及職業教育，61，10-12。
科技部（2020）。蘇揆：讓「設計力」成為我國重要施政價值與國家戰略。https://www.ey.gov.tw/Page/9277F759E41CCD91/2fe7b3f5-c104-4173-b36e-ea0e592dcf4a
范斯淳（2016）。高中工程設計取向之課程設計與實驗：跨學科STEM知識的整合與應用[未出版之博士論文]。國立臺灣師範大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/rx4xa2
徐慶帆（2007）。軍事院校學生運動態度、運動價值觀及運動行為之研究[未出版之碩士論文]。輔仁大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/tp93z8
高俊雄（1995）。觀光旅遊地區經營開發之規劃與推動。觀光研究學報，1（3），29-43。 https://doi.org/10.6267/JTLS.1995.1(3)2
國家發展委員會（2021）。亞洲．矽谷2.0推動方案院核定本。https://www.ndc.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=F5B74E2D1BE76675
張玉山（2001）。國小科技課程之教學設計方法。載於花蓮師院舉辦之「九年一貫課程的理念與實踐－自然與生活科技學習領域」研討會論文集，18-32。
張玉山（2003）。虛擬團隊之創造力研究-以師院勞作課程為例[未出版之博士論文]。國立台灣師範大學。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/2rack9
張玉山（2008）。國小科技教育的重新檢視。生活科技教育月刊，41(2)，1-2。 https://doi.org/10.6232/LTE.2008.41(2).1
張玉山（2017）。以STEAM 創客教育培養21 世紀能力。新北市教育，22，13-15。 https://www.ntpc.edu.tw/home.jsp?id=f5d3d613d00fede2&act=be4f48068b2b0031&dataserno=26fc297106f1a07930961480a6f1d8d2
張玉山、李大偉、游光昭、林雅玲（2009）。不同範例展示及實作經驗對國中生科技創造力的影響。教育科學研究期刊，54（4），1-27。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh?DocID=2073753X-200912-201308190020-201308190020-1-27&PublishTypeID=P001
張芳瑜（2016）。於高中實施工程設計專題製作活動課程設計之探討。科技與人力教育季刊，3(1)，5-11。https://doi.org/10.6587/JTHRE.2016.3(1).2
張春興（1995）。教育心理學。東華。
張春興（2000）。教育心理學：三化取向的理論與實踐。東華。
張紹勳、林秀娟（2005）。SPSS初等統計分析。滄海。
張智傑（2018）。為 [誰] 辛苦為 [誰] 忙?職場中個我取向與主管取向成就動機之量表建立及中介效果檢驗[未出版之碩士論文]。國立台灣大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/4g85ug
教育部（2018）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要國民中學暨普通型高級中等學校-科技領域。國家教育研究院。https://www.naer.edu.tw/upload/1/16/doc/816/十二年國民基本教育課程綱要國民中學暨普通高級中等學校-科技領域.pdf
符傑程（2019）。國小高年級學童美塔學量表發展與驗證 性分析之研究[未出版之碩士論文]。國立臺東大學。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/rakat6
莊孟蓉（2010）。認知風格與思考風格對高中學生產品創意表現影響之研究[未出版之碩士論文]。國立臺灣師範大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/83xq4z
郭生玉（2005）。心理與教育研究法。
郭奕龍、鄒小蘭、丁怡（2007）。契克森米哈伊理論在資優教育之應用。資優教育季刊，103，19-28。
陳幼慧。（2012）。文化學習理論與通識教育。通識教育學刊，9，47-68。https://doi.org/10.6360/TJGE.201206.0047
陳尚群（2011）。網路匿名性對虛擬社群成員發佈文章之影響－以 Facebook與BBS為例[未出版之博士論文]。國立中央大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/k9nd28
陳怡靜（2005）。產品文化價值與創意對顧客基礎品牌權益之探討[未出版之碩士論文]。國立高雄第一科技大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/rhkesw
陳婉心（2021）。國中生自我設限行為之探究。臺灣教育評論月刊， 10(10)，136-141。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh?DocID=P20130114001-202110-202110040017-202110040017-136-141&PublishTypeID=P001
陳裕寬、王正華（2021）。論文統計分析實務SPSS與AMOS的運用。五南。
陳龍安（2007）。創造思考教學的理論與實際。心理出版社有限公司。
陳龍安（2010）。台灣的創造力教育發展與突破之道。創造學刊，1(1)，5-37。 https://doi.org/10.30081/CESJ.201003.0001
黃芳銘。（2009）。結構方程模式理論與應用。五南。
楊筑鈞（2003）。產品創新、品牌形象、價格對知覺價值影響之研究[未出版之博士論文]。輔仁大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/t8bgah
葉玉珠（2006）。創造力教學—過去、現在與未來。心理出版社。
葉炳煙（2013）。創意動機定義與相關理論之研究。屏東教育月刊，16，285-293。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh?DocID=a0000545-201304-201306250007-201306250007-285-293&PublishTypeID=P001
劉靖國（2005）。成就動機理論及其在教學上的應用。中等教育，56(4)，96-109。
蔡依帆（2016）。雲端行動學習對大學生創意動機及創意表現之影響-以電腦影像處理課程為例[未出版之碩士論文]。國立臺灣師範大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/j9sc4t
蔣恩芬（2000）。創意動機相關因素探討與創意動機方案成效研究[未出版之碩士論文]。國立高雄師範大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/ke9798
鄭國明、王仁俊（2017）。國中小學自造教育發展與現況。中等教育，68(2)，116-126。https://doi.org/10.6249/SE.2017.68.2.09
盧俊宏、卓國雄、陳龍弘（2005）。健身運動心理學：理論與概念。易利圖書。
賴志樫（2020）。生活科技課程實作教學的理論探究與教師訪談。課程與教學季刊，23(4)，1-26。 https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.202010_23(4).0001
賴思妤、陳李綢、何函儒（2022）。中學生正向學習量表之發展研究。教育心理學報，5(4)，155-178。http://epbulletin.epc.ntnu.edu.tw/upload/journal/prog/710bba10_20221017.pdf
戴霈妮（2017）。運動產業消費者社會責任與其購買意圖－以計畫行為模式為觀點[未出版之博士論文]。立彰化師範大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/38e4x8
薛家明（2016）。以計畫行為模式探討影響大學生出國留學意向之因素[未出版之博士論文]。國立臺灣師範大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/6n99k5
韓楷木聖（2001）。創意動機的輔導。載於李咏吟（主編），學習輔導，209-242。心理。
簡瑞宇（2008）。滿意度理論與選手訓練滿意度之相關研究。臺中教育大學體育學系系刊，3，52-57。https://doi.org/10.29781/NTCUPE.200808.0009
蘇榮海、徐茂洲（2021）。中國大學生觀賞田徑賽事之行為意圖：計畫行為模式驗證。大專體育，156，18-34。https://doi.org/10.6162/SRR.202103_(156).0003
蘇維杉（2015）。運動產業概論。揚智。
貳、英文部份
Aguirre‐Rodriguez, A., Bagozzi, R. P., & Torres, P. L. (2021). Beyond craving: Appetitive desire as a motivational antecedent of goal‐directed action intentions. Psychology & Marketing, 38(12), 2169-2190. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21560
Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. action control, 11-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t
Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 665-683. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00236.x
Ajzen, I. (2013). Theory of planned behaviour questionnaire. Measurement Instrument Database for the Social Science. http://www.midss.org/sites/default/files/tpb.construction.pdf
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1975). A bayesian analysis of attribution processes. Psychological Bulletin, 82(2), 261-277. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076477
Ajzen, I., & Schmidt, P. (2020). Changing behavior using the theory of planned behavior. In M. S. Hagger, L. D. Cameron, K. Hamilton, N. Hankonen & T. Lintunen (Eds.), The handbook of behavior change (pp. 17-31). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108677318.002
Ajzen, I., Joyce, N., Sheikh, S., & Cote, N. G. (2011). Knowledge and the prediction of behavior: The role of information accuracy in the theory of planned behavior. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 33(2), 101-117. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2011.568834
Ajzen, I., & Madden, T. J. (1986). Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22(5), 453-474. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(86)90045-4
Albarracín, D., & Wyer, R. S. (2000). The cognitive impact of past behavior: Influences on beliefs, attitudes, and future behavioral decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(1), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.1.5
Alexandris, K., Tsorbatzoudis, C., & Grouios, G. (2002). Perceived constraints on recreational sport participation: Investigating their relationship with intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation and amotivation. Journal of Leisure research, 34(3), 233-252. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2002.11949970
Aljughaiman, A., & Mowrer-Reynolds, E. (2005). Teachers’ conceptions of creativity and creative students. Journal of Creative Behavior, 39, 17-34. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2005.tb01247.x
Alt, D., Kapshuk, Y., & Dekel, H. (2023). Promoting perceived creativity and innovative behavior: Benefits of future problem-solving programs for higher education students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101201
Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357-376. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357
Amabile, T. M. (1985). Motivation and creativity: Effects of motivational orientation on creative writers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(2), 393-399. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.48.2.393
Amabile, T. M. (1997). Motivating creativity in organizations: On doing what you love and loving what you do. California Management Review, 40(1), 39-58. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165921
Amabile, T. M. (2001). Beyond talent: John irving and the passionate craft of creativity. American Psychologist, 56(4), 333-–336. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.56.4.333
Amabile, T. M., & Pratt, M. G. (2016). The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 157-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2016.10.001
Amabile, T.M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organization. Research in Organizational behavior, 10, 123-167. https://web.mit.edu/curhan/www/docs/Articles/15341_Readings/Group_Performance/Amabile_A_Model_of_CreativityOrg.Beh_v10_pp123-167.pdf
Amabile, T.M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Westview Press.
Amabile, T.M. (2012). Componential theory of creativity (pp. 538-559). Harvard Business School Press.
Anderman, E. M., Gray, D. L., & Chang Y. (2012). Motivation and classroom learning. In Weiner, I. B. (Series Ed.), Handbook of Psychology: Vol. 7. Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118133880.hop207005
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297-1333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314527128
Anseel, F., & Lievens, F. (2009). The mediating role of feedback acceptance in the relationship between feedback and attitudinal and performance outcomes. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17(4), 362-376. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2009.00479.x
Aranguren, M., & Irrazabal, N. (2012). A scale for the evaluation of creativity behavior in different domains: Development and design. Ciencias Psicológicas, 6(1), 29-41. https://doi.org/10.22235/cp.v6i1.60
Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(4), 471-499. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466601164939
Asghar, A., Ellington, R., Rice, E., Johnson, F., & Prime, G. M. (2012). Supporting STEM education in secondary science contexts. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1349
Asunda, P. A., & Hill, R. B. (2007). Critical features of engineering design in technology education. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 44(1), 25-48. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ830474.pdf
Atikinson, J. W. (1964). An Introduction to motivation. Van Nostrand Press.
Auger, P., & Woodman, R. W. (2016). Creativity and intrinsic motivation. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 52(3), 342-366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886316656973
Ayvaz, Ü., & Durmuş, S. (2021). Fostering mathematical creativity with problem posing activities: An action research with gifted students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100846
Bagozzi, R. P. (2006). Consumer action: automaticity, purposiveness, and self-regulation, in Malhotra, N. K. (ed.), Review of Marketing Research, 3-42. Sharpe Press.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Dholakia, U. M. (2006). Open source software user communities: A study of participation in linux user groups. Management Science, 52(7), 1099-1115. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0545
Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1990). Trying to consume. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(2), 127-140. https://doi.org/10.1086/208543
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02723327
Bagozzi, R. P., Lee, K.-H., & Van Loo, M. F. (2001). Decisions to donate bone marrow: The role of attitudes and subjective norms across cultures. Psychology & Health, 16(1), 29-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440108405488
Bagozzi, R. P., Wong, N., & Yi, Y. (1999). The role of culture and gender in the relationship between positive and negative affect. Cognition & Emotion, 13(6), 641-672. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999399379023
Baharom, S., Khoiry, M. A., Hamid, R., Mutalib, A. A., & Hamzah, N. (2015). Assessment of psychomotor domain in a problem-based concrete laboratory. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, Special Issue on UKM Teaching and Learning Congress, 2013, 1-10. http://jestec.taylors.edu.my/Special%20Issue%20UKM%20TLC%202013_1/UKMTLC%202013_6_2015_1_001_010.pdf
Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.). Annals of child development: Six theories of child development, 1-60. JAI Press.
Barron, F. (1969). Creative person and creative process. Holt, Rinehart, & Winston Press.
Beghetto, R. A. (2019). Structured uncertainty: How creativity thrives under constraints and uncertainty. Creativity Theory and Action in Education,3, 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90272-2_2
Beghetto, R. A. (2021). Creativity in K-12 schools. In R. J. Sternberg & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Creativity: An introduction (pp. 447-464). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108776721.013
Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2013). Fundamentals of creativity. Educational Leadership, 70, 10-15. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1006686
Beghetto, R. A., & Plucker, J. A. (2006). The relationship among schooling, learning, and creativity: “All roads lead to creativity” or “You can’t get there from here?” In J. C. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Creativity and reason in cognitive development. (pp. 316-332). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511606915.019
Besemer, S. P., & O’Quin, K. (1986). Analyzing creative products: Refinement and test of a judging instrument. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 20(2), 115-126. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1986.tb00426.x
Bianchi, C. (2021). Antecedents of tourists’ solo travel intentions. Tourism Review, 77(3), 780–795. https://doi.org/10.1108/tr-12-2020-0611
Birney, D. P., Beckmann, J. F., & Seah, Y. Z. (2016). More than the eye of the beholder: The interplay of person, task, and situation factors in evaluative judgements of creativity. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 400-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.07.007
Bollen, K. A., & Liang, J. (1988). Some properties of Hoelter's CN. Sociological Methods & Research, 16, 492-503. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124188016004003
Boomsma, A. (1982). Systems under indirect observation: Causality, structure, prediction. The robustness of lisrel against small sample sizes in factor analysis models, 149-173.
Bosnjak, M., Obermeier, D., & Tuten, T. L. (2006). Predicting and explaining the propensity to bid in online auctions: a comparison of two action-theoretical models. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 5(2), 102-116. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.38
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Sage. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002005
Budynas, R. G., & Nisbett, J. K. (2011). Shigley’s mechanical engineering design (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill Press. https://www.academia.edu/37397805/Shigleys_Mechanical_Engineering_Design_9th_Edition
Bybee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM education: A 2020 vision. The Technology and Engineering. Teacher, 70(1), 30-35. https://www.proquest.com/docview/853062675?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true
Cantero-Sánchez, F. J., León-Rubio, J. M., Vázquez-Morejón, R., & León-Pérez, J. M. (2021). Evaluation of an assertiveness training based on the social learning theory for occupational health, safety and environment practitioners. Sustainability, 13(20). https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011504
Castañeda, J. A., Muñoz-Leiva, F., & Luque, T. (2007). Web acceptance model (WAM): Moderating effects of user experience. Information & Management, 44(4), 384-396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2007.02.003
Chandon, P., Morwitz, V. G., & Reinartz, W. J. (2005). Do intentions really predict behavior? Self-generated validity effects in survey research. Journal of Marketing, 69(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.69.2.1.60755
Chang, Y. S., & Yu, K. (2015). The relationship between perceptions of an innovative environment and creative performance in an online synchronous environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 38-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.040
Chang, Y. S., Chien, Y. H., Yu, K. C., Lin, H. C., & Chen, M. Y. C. (2016). Students’ innovative environmental perceptions and creative performances in cloud-based m-learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 988-994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.032
Chen, Y., Chang, Y., & Chuang, M. (2021). Virtual reality application influences cognitive load‐mediated creativity components and creative performance in engineering design. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(1), 6-18. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12588
Chen, Y.-T., Liu, M.-J., & Cheng, Y.-Y. (2023). Discovering scientific creativity with digital storytelling. Journal of Creativity, 33(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjoc.2022.100041
Chouchane, R., Fernet, C., Austin, S., & Zouaoui, S. K. (2023). Organizational support and intrapreneurial behavior: on the role of employees' intrapreneurial intention and self-efficacy. Journal of Management & Organization, 29(2), 366-382. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2021.14
Comery, A.L., & Lee, H.B. (1992). A First Course Factor Analysis (2nd ed.). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315827506
Cook, V., Major, L., Warwick, P., & Vrikki, M. (2020). Developing collaborative creativity through microblogging: A material-dialogic approach. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100685
Corlu, M. S., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2014). Introducing STEM education: Implications. for educating our teachers for the age of innovation. Education and Science, 39(171), 74-85. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260517903_Introducing_STEM_Education_Implications_for_Educating_Our_Teachers_For_the_Age_of_Innovation
Crandall, V. C. (1963). Reinforcement effects of adult actions and nonreactions on children’s achievement expectations. Children Development, 34, 335-354. https://doi.org/10.2307/1126731
Crandall, V. C., Good, S., & Crandall, V. J. (1964). Reinforcement effects of adult actions and nonreactions on children’s achievement expectations: A replication study. Children Development, 35, 485-497. https://doi.org/10.2307/1126712
Crawford, E. R., LePine, J. A., & Rich, B. L. (2010). Linking job demands and resources to employee engagement and burnout: A theoretical extension and meta-analytic test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(5), 834-848. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019364
Crilly, N., & Cardoso, C. (2017). Where next for research on fixation, inspiration and creativity in design? Design Studies, 50, 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2017.02.001
Cromwell, J. R., Haase, J., & Vladova, G. (2023). The creative thinking profile: Predicting intrinsic motivation based on preferences for different creative thinking styles. Personality and Individual Differences, 208, 112205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2023.112205
Cropley, D. H. (2015). Promoting creativity and innovation in engineering education. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(2), 161-171. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000008
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Motivation and creativity: Toward a synthesis of structural and energistic approaches to cognition. New Ideas in psychology, 6(2), 159-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/0732-118x(88)90001-3
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. Handbook of Creativity, 313-336. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511807916.018
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Csikszentmihalyi, I. S. (Eds.)(2006). A life worth living: Contributions to positive psychology. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.44-1815
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Wolfe, R. (2000). New conceptions and research approaches to creativity: Implications of a systems perspective for creativity in education. In Heller, K. A., Monk, F. J., Sternberg, R. J. & Subotnik, R. F. (eds.)(2000). IInternational Handbook of Giftedness and Talent, 81-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-008043796-5/50006-1
Deaton, S. (2015). Social learning theory in the age of social media: Implications for educational practitioners. I-Manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 12(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.12.1.3430
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in numan behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7
Diedrich, J., Jauk, E., Silvia, P. J., Gredlein, J. M., Neubauer, A. C., & Benedek, M. (2018). Assessment of real-life creativity: The inventory of creative activities and achievements (ICAA). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 12(3), 304-316. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000137
Doll, W. J., Xia, W., & Torkzadeh, G. (1994). A confirmatory factor analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument. MIS Quarterly, 18(4), 453. https://doi.org/10.2307/249524
Downward, P., & Rasciute, S. (2010). The relative demands for sports and leisure in England. European Sport Management Quarterly, 10(2), 189-214. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184740903552037
Dunsmore, K., Turns, J., & Yellin, J. M. (2011). Looking toward the real world: Student conceptions of engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(2), 329-348. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00016.x
Eagly, A. H. & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt, Brace, & amp; Janovich, 1993, 794. Reviewed by Christopher Leone, University of North Florida. (1995). Psychology and Marketing, 12(5), 459-466. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.4220120509
Elisondo, R. C. (2020). Creative actions scale: A spanish scale of creativity in different domains. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 55(1), 215-227. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.447
Elisondo, R. C., Soroa, G., & Flores, B. (2022). Leisure activities, creative actions and emotional creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101060
Elisondo, R., & Donolo, D. (2016). Construcción y análisis de las propiedades psicométricas del cuestionario de acciones creativas en población argentina. PSIENCIA. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencia Psicológica, 8(1), 1-21. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/3331/333145838006.pdf
Eltanahy, M., Forawi, S., & Mansour, N. (2020). Incorporating entrepreneurial practices into STEM education: Development of interdisciplinary E-STEM model in high school in the United Arab Emirates. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100697
Ertas, A., & Jones, J. C. (1993). The engineering design process. European Journal of Engineering Education, 18(2), 214. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043799308928173
European Union (2016). EU youth report. http://ec.europa.eu/youth/library/reports/youth-report-2015_en.pdf.
Fan, S. C., Yu, K. C., & Lin, K. Y. (2021). A framework for implementing an engineering-focused STEM curriculum. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(8), 1523-1541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10129-y
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 382-388. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3150980
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds. Basic Books Press.
Gattie, D. K., & Wicklein, R. C. (2007). Curricular value and instructional needs for infusing engineering design into K-12 technology education. Journal of Technology Education, 19 (1), 6-18. https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v19i1.a.1
Gerbino, M. (2020). Self‐efficacy. The Wiley Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences, 387-391. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118970843.ch243
Gibson, R. (2010). The ‘art’ of creative teaching: implications for higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 15 (5), 607-613. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2010.493349
Ginns, P., Freebody, K., Anderson, M., & O’Connor, P. (2021). Student experience of creativity in Australian high school classrooms: A componential model. Learning and Individual Differences, 91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102057
Glancy, A.W & Moore, T.J. (2013). Theoretical foundations for effective STEM learning environments. Engineering Education. Working Papers. Paper 1. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/enewp/1/
Goossens, L. (2014). Affinity for aloneness in adolescence and preference for solitude in childhood. The Handbook of Solitude: Psychological perspectives on social isolation, 150-166. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118427378.ch9
Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5 (9), 444-454. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063487
Hagger, M. S., Cheung, M. W.-L., Ajzen, I., & Hamilton, K. (2022). Perceived behavioral control moderating effects in the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology, 41(2), 155-167. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0001153
Hagger, M. S., Polet, J., & Lintunen, T. (2018). The reasoned action approach applied to health behavior: Role of past behavior and tests of some key moderators using meta-analytic structural equation modeling. Social Science & amp; Medicine, 213, 85-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.07.038
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (7th ed.). Prentice Hall Press.
Hair, J. F., Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Prentice-Hall International Press.
Hanlon, M., Yeung, K., & Zuo, L. (2021). Behavioral economics of accounting: A review of archival research on individual decision makers. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3923891
Hannah, D., Sinnema, C., & Robinson, V. (2022). Understanding curricula as theories of action. The Curriculum Journal, 33(3), 362-377. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.138
Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61(1), 569-598. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100416
Henry, J. W., & Stone, R. W. (1994). A Structural equation model of end-user satisfaction with a computer-based medical information system. Information Resources Management Journal, 7 (3), 21-33. https://doi.org/10.4018/irmj.1994070102
Herrmann, P., Singer, R., Kaufmann, P., & Spang, K. (2022). Let us integrate self-organization and stakeholders into the development of infrastructure projects, because we need more creativity and satisfying solutions. Research on Project, Programme and Portfolio Management: Projects as an Arena for Self-Organizing, 221-241. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86248-0_13
Hidayat, T., Susilaningsih, E., & Kurniawan, C. (2018). The effectiveness of enrichment test instruments design to measure students’ creative thinking skills and problem-solving. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 29, 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.02.011
Hoelter, J. W. (1983). The Analysis of Covariance Structures. Sociological Methods & Research, 11(3), 325-344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124183011003003
Ho, H. C. Y., Poon, K.-T., Chan, K. K. S., Cheung, S. K., Datu, J. A. D., & Tse, C. Y. A. (2023). Promoting preservice teachers’ psychological and pedagogical competencies for online learning and teaching: The T.E.A.C.H. program. Computers & Education, 195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104725
Honzíková, J., & Krotký, J. (2017). Correlation between psychomotor skills and creativity among secondary school students and future teachers. Edukacja – Technika – Informatyka, 20 (2), 93-101. https://doi.org/10.15584/eti.2017.2.11
Hornsey, M. J., Harris, E. A., Bain, P. G., & Fielding, K. S. (2016). Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change. Nature Climate Change, 6(6), 622-626. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2943
Householder, D. L. & Hailey, C. E. (2012). Incorporating engineering design challenges into STEM courses. Utah State University Press. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1164&context=ncete_publications
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6 (1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Huang, B., Jong, M. S. Y., King, R. B., Chai, C. S., & Jiang, M. Y. C. (2022). Promoting secondary students' twenty-first century skills and STEM career interests through a crossover program of STEM and community service education. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.903252
Huang, N., Chang, Y., & Chou, C. (2020). Effects of creative thinking, psychomotor skills, and creative self-efficacy on engineering design creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100695
Huang, S., & Hsu, C. H. C. (2009). “Effects of travel motivation, past experience, perceived constraint, and attitude on revisit intention”. Journal of Travel Research, 48(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287508328793
Hynes, B., Costin, Y., & Richardson, I. (2023). Educating for STEM: developing entrepreneurial thinking in STEM (Entre-STEM). Enhancing Entrepreneurial Mindsets Through STEM Education, 165-194. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17816-0_8
International Technology and Engineering Educators Association [ITEEA]. (2007). Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology. Reston Press.
Jackson, A., Godwin, A., Bartholomew, S., & Mentzer, N. (2021). Learning from failure: A systematized review. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32 (3), 1853-1873. https:/doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09661-x
Jang, H. (2015). Identifying 21st century STEM competencies using workplace data. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(2), 284-301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9593-1
Jin, Y., & Chusilp, P. (2006). Study of mental iteration in different design situations. Design Studies, 27 (1), 25-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2005.06.003
Jordan, E. J., Bynum Boley, B., Knollenberg, W., & Kline, C. (2017). Predictors of intention to travel to Cuba across three time horizons: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Travel Research, 57(7), 981-993. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287517721370
Jöreskog, K.G. and Sörbom, D. (1996) LISREL 8: User’s reference guide. Scientific Software International Press.
Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39 (1), 31-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02291575
Kang, H., Hahn, M., Fortin, D. R., Hyun, Y. J., & Eom, Y. (2006). Effects of perceived behavioral control on the consumer usage intention of e-coupons. Psychology and Marketing, 23 (10), 841-864. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20136
Kassim, H., Nicholas, H., & Ng, W. (2014). Using a multimedia learning tool to improve creative performance. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 13,9-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2014.02.004
Katz‐Buonincontro, J., & Anderson, R. C. (2018). A review of articles using observation methods to study creativity in education (1980–2018). The Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(3), 508-524. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.385
Kaufman, J. C. (2012). Counting the muses: Development of the Kaufman domains of creativity scale (K-DOCS). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(4), 298-308. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029751
Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2014). Creativity in the schools: Renewed interest and promising new directions. In M. J. Furlong, R. Gilman, & E. S. Huebner (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology in the schools. 165-175. Routledge Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203106525-16
Kelley, T. (2008). Cognitive processes of students participating in engineering-focused design instruction. Journal of Technology Education, 19 (2), 50-64. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ898817.pdf
Kelly, T. R. (2010). Staking the claim for the ‘T’ in STEM. The Journal of Technology Studies, 36 (1), 2-11. https://doi:10.21061/jots.v36i1.a.1
Kidwell, B., & Jewell, R. D. (2003). The moderated influence of internal control: An examination across health‐related behaviors. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(4), 377-386. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1304_05
Kidwell, B., & Jewell, R. D. (2008). The influence of past behavior on behavioral intent: An information-processing explanation. Psychology and Marketing, 25(12), 1151-1166. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20258
Kim, C. Y., & Chung, H. S. (2022). The autoregressive cross-lagged effect of unions on job satisfaction and burnout. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-02914-5
Kim, K. M., & Lee, K. (2016). Collaborative product design processes of industrial design and engineering design in consumer product companies. Design Studies, 46, 226-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2016.06.003.
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. (2nd Eds.). The Guilford Press.
Kline, T. (2005). Psychological testing: A practical approach to design and evaluation. Sage Press.
Kuczmarski, T.D. (1992). Managing new products: The power of innovation. 33-35. Prentice-Hall Direct Press.
Kukkonen, T., & Bolden, B. (2022). Nurturing creativity in the visual arts classroom understanding teacher strategies through Amabile's componential theory. Canadian Review of Art Education, 49(1), 46-62. https://doi.org/10.26443/crae.v49i1.166
Lam, T., & Hsu, C. H. C. (2004). Theory of planned behavior: potential travelers from China. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 28(4), 463-482. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348004267515
Lavi, R., & Marti, D. (2023). A proposed case-based learning framework for fostering undergraduate engineering students’ creative and critical thinking. Journal of Science Education and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-10017-w
Lee, C. K., Song, H. J., Bendle, L. J., Kim, M. J., & Han, H. (2012). The impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions for 2009 H1N1 influenza on travel intentions: A model of goal-directed behavior. Tourism Management, 33(1), 89-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2011.02.006
Lee, T. S-C. (2022). Curriculum based interactive art exhibition design and family's learning experiences: A case study of the children's art museum in Taipei (Lee, T. S-C. trans.) The Museum Journal, 65(2), 243-254. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/cura.12490
Lewis, T. (2005). Coming to terms with engineering design as content. Journal of Technology Education, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v16i2.a.3
Li, L., & Zhang, Y. (2023). An extended theory of planned behavior to explain the intention to use carsharing: a multi-group analysis of different sociodemographic characteristics. Transportation, 50(1), 143-181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-021-10240-1
Lin, H. C., Chang, Y., & Li, W. H. (2020). Effects of a virtual reality teaching application on engineering design creativity of boys and girls. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100705
Lin, P. Y., Wood, W., & Monterosso, J. (2016). Healthy eating habits protect against temptations. Appetite, 103, 432-440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2015.11.011
Lin, S. H., Lee, H. C., Chang, C. T., & James Fu, C. (2020). Behavioral intention towards mobile learning in Taiwan, China, Indonesia, and Vietnam. Technology in Society, 63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101387
Liston, M., Barry, G., & O’Sullivan, P. (2023). Inspiring the next generation of innovators through a multidisciplinary entrepreneurship and STEM educational outreach programme. Enhancing Entrepreneurial Mindsets Through STEM Education, 293-323. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17816-0_13
Liu, H. Y., Chang, C. C., Wang, I. T., & Chao, S. Y. (2020). The association between creativity, creative components of personality, and innovation among Taiwanese nursing students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100629
Loehlin, J. C. (2004). Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path, and structural equation analysis. Psychology Press.
Long, H., & Wang, J. (2022). Dissecting reliability and validity evidence of subjective creativity assessment: A literature review. Educational Psychology Review, 34(3), 1399-1443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09679-0
Long, H., Kerr, B. A., Emler, T. E., & Birdnow, M. (2022). A critical review of assessments of creativity in education. Review of Research in Education, 46(1), 288-323. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732x221084326
Luque, D., Molinero, S., Watson, P., López, F. J., & Le Pelley, M. E. (2020). Measuring habit formation through goal-directed response switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(8), 1449-1459. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000722
Lyu, J., Shepherd, D., & Lee, K. (2023). From intentional to nascent student entrepreneurs: The moderating role of university entrepreneurial offerings. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2023.100305
MacCallum, R. C., & Hong, S. (1997). Power Analysis in Covariance Structure Modeling Using GFI and AGFI. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32(2), 193-210. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3202_5
MacDonald, L., Thomas, E., Javernick-Will, A., Austin-Breneman, J., Aranda, I., Salvinelli, C., Klees, R., Walters, J., Parmentier, M. J., Schaad, D., Shahi, A., Bedell, E., Platais, G., Brown, J., Gershenson, J., Watkins, D., Obonyo, E., Oyanedel-Craver, V., Olson, M., … Linden, K. (2022). Aligning learning objectives and approaches in global engineering graduate programs: Review and recommendations by an interdisciplinary working group. Development Engineering, 7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.deveng.2022.100095
MacKinnon D.W., (1978). In search of human effectiveness: Identifying and developing creativity, Creative Education Foundation Press.
Malmendier, U., & Nagel, S. (2011). Depression babies: Do macroeconomic experiences affect risk-taking? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126 (1), 373-416. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjq004
Malmendier, U., & Nagel, S. (2016). Learning from inflation experiences. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(1), 53-87. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjv037
Maltese, A. V., Simpson, A., & Anderson, A. (2018). Failing to learn: The impact of failures during making activities. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 30, 116-124. https:/doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.01.003
Mardia, K. V. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 57(3), 519-530. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/57.3.519
Marquis, C., & Tilcsik, A. (2013). Imprinting: Toward a multilevel theory. Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 195-245. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2013.766076
Maslow, A. H. (1970). Motivation and personality. Harper -Collins Press.
Mavri, A., Ioannou, A., & Loizides, F. (2020). Design students meet industry players: Feedback and creativity in communities of practice. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100684
Mayer, J. D., Caruso, D. R., & Salovey, P. (1999). Emotional intelligence meets traditional standards for an intelligence. Intelligence, 27(4), 267-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0160-2896(99)00016-1
McClelland, D. C. (1985). How motives, skills, and values determine what people do. American Psychologist, 40(7), 812-825. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.40.7.812
McClelland, D. C., Atkinson, J. W., Clark, R. A., & Lowell, E. L. (1953). Analysis of imaginative stories for motivational content. The Achievement Motive, 107-138. https://doi.org/10.1037/11144-004
McCombs, B. L. (2000). Reducing the achievement GAP. Society, 37(5), 29-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-000-1034-x
McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M.-H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 64-82. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.64
Meng, B., & Choi, K. (2016). The role of authenticity in forming slow tourists’ intentions: Developing an extended model of goal-directed behavior. Tourism Management, 57, 397-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2016.07.003
Mentzer, N. (2011). High school engineering and technology education integration through design challenges. Journal of STEM Teacher Education, 48(2), 103-136. https://doi.org/10.30707/jste48.2mentzer
Mentzer, N., Huffman, T., & Thayer, H. (2014). High school student modeling in the engineering design process. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 24(3), 293-316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-013-9260-x
Merrill, C., Custer, R., Daugherty, J., Westrick, M., & Zeng, Y. (2008). Delivering core engineering concepts to secondary level students. Journal of Technology Education, 20(1), 48-64. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ898823.pdf
nonMiron-Spektor, E., & Beenen, G. (2015). Motivating creativity: The effects of sequential and simultaneous learning and performance achievement goals on product novelty and usefulness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 127, 53-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.01.001
Mishra, P., & Henriksen, D. (2013). A new approach to defining and measuring creativity: Rethinking technology & creativity in the 21st century. TechTrends, 57(5), 10-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-013-0685-6
Montag-Smit, T., & Maertz, C. P. (2017). Searching outside the box in creative problem solving: The role of creative thinking skills and domain knowledge. Journal of Business Research, 81, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.07.021
Moore, T. J., Miller, R. L., Lesh, R. A., Stohlmann, M. S., & Kim, Y. R. (2013). Modeling in engineering: The role of representational fluency in students’ conceptual understanding. Journal of Engineering Education, 102(1), 141-178. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20004
Morin, S., Robert, J.-M., & Gabora, L. (2018). How to train future engineers to be more creative? An educative experience. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 28, 150-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.05.003
Mosely, G., Wright, N., & Wrigley, C. (2018). Facilitating design thinking: A comparison of design expertise. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 27, 177-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.02.004
Muhideen, S., Jianxun, C., Akintunde, T. Y., Olayemi, R. H., Koroma, J., Amosum, T. T., & Shahani, R. (2021). Nexus between students’ attitude towards self-learning, tencent app usability, mobile-learning, and innovative performance. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 4 (1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100217
Mulaik, S. A., James, L. R., Van Alstine, J., Bennett, N., Lind, S., & Stilwell, C. D. (1989). Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. Psychological Bulletin, 105(3), 430-445. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.430
Mykletun, R.J., & Rumba, M. (2014). Athletes’ experiences, enjoyment, satisfaction, and memories from the extreme sport week in Voss, Norway. Sport, Business and Management: An International Journal, 4(4), 317-335. https://doi.org/10.1108/SBM-12-2013-0046
National Research Council [NRC]. (2009). Engineering in K-12 education: Understanding the status and improving the prospects. The National Academies Press.
National Science Foundation (2014). Enabling a new future for cloud computing. http://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=132377.
Nazzal, L. J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2020). The relationship of the quality of creative problem solving stages to overall creativity in engineering students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100734
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18290
Nie, J., Zheng, C., Zeng, P., Zhou, B., Lei, L., & Wang, P. (2020). Using the theory of planned behavior and the role of social image to understand mobile English learning check-in behavior. Computers & Education, 156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103942
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill Press.
Odou, P., & Schill, M. (2020). How anticipated emotions shape behavioral intentions to fight climate change. Journal of Business Research, 121, 243-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.047
Oh, Y., Ishizaki, S., Gross, M. D., & Yi-Luen Do, E. (2013). A theoretical framework of design critiquing in architecture studios. Design Studies, 34(3), 302-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2012.08.004
Oksenberg, L., Cannell, C., & Kalton, G.(1991). New strategies for pretesting survey questions. Journal of official statistics, 7(3), 349-365. https://www.scb.se/contentassets/ca21efb41fee47d293bbee5bf7be7fb3/new-strategies-for-pretesting-survey-questions.pdf
Oladele, J. I., Ayanwale, M. A., & Ndlovu, M. (2023). Technology adoption for STEM education in higher education: Students’ experience from selected sub-saharan African countries. Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology, 31(1), 237-256. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjst.31.1.15
Onsman, A. (2016). Assessing creativity in a ‘New Generation’ architecture degree. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 19, 210-218. https://doi.org/10.101.6/j.tsc.2015.07.001
Orbell, S., & Verplanken, B. (2020). Changing behavior using habit theory. The Handbook of Behavior Change, 178-192. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108677318.013
Ouellette, J. A., & Wood, W. (1998). Habit and intention in everyday life the multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 124(1), 54-74. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.1.54
Paek, S. H., & Runco, M. A. (2017). Dealing with the criterion problem by measuring the quality and quantity of creative activity and accomplishment. Creativity Research Journal, 29(2), 167-173. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2017.1304078
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 91-105. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3702_4
Peng, J.-C., & Chen, S.-W. (2022). Learning climate and innovative creative performance: Exploring the multi-level mediating mechanism of team psychological capital and work engagement. Current Psychology, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02617-3
Peng, M. Y. P., Zhang, Z., & Ho, S. S. H. (2019). A Study on the relationship among knowledge acquisition sources at the teacher-and college-level, student absorptive capacity and learning outcomes: Using student prior knowledge as a moderator. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 19(2), 22-39. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2019.2.002
Perignat, E., & Katz-Buonincontro, J. (2019). STEAM in practice and research: An integrative literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 31-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.10.002
Perugini, M., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2001). The role of desires and anticipated emotions in goal-directed behaviours: Broadening and deepening the theory of planned behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(1), 79-98. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466601164704
Perugini, M., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2004a). The distinction between desires and intentions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34(1), 69-84. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.186
Perugini, M., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2004b). An alternative view of pre-volitional processes in decision making: Conceptual issues and empirical evidence. In G. Haddock & G.R. Maio (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on the psychology of attitudes: The Cardiff symposium. 169-201. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203645031
Perugini, M., & Conner, M. (2000). Predicting and understanding behavioral volitions: the interplay between goals and behaviors. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30(5), 705-731. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-0992(200009/10)30:5<705::aid-ejsp18>3.0.co;2-#
Pintrich, P. R. (1989). The dynamic interplay of student motivation and cognition in the college classroom. Advances in Motivation and Achievement, 6, 117-160. JAI Press.
Rana, N. P., Slade, E., Kitching, S., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2019). The IT way of loafing in class: Extending the theory of planned behavior (TPB) to understand students’ cyberslacking intentions. Computers in Human Behavior, 101, 114-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.07.022
Reimers, J. E., Farmer, C. L., & Klein-Gardner, S. S. (2015). An introduction to the standards for preparation and professional development for yeachers of engineering. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 5(1). https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1107
Renninger, K. A., & Bachrach, J. E. (2015). Studying triggers for interest and engagement using observational methods. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 58-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.999920
Rhodes, R. E., & Dickau, L. (2012). Experimental evidence for the intention–behavior relationship in the physical activity domain: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology, 31(6), 724-727. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027290
Ribeiro, T., Silva, J., Paz, M., Cardoso, A., Teles, N., Nogueira, C., & Ribeiro, T. (2023). Strengthening bridges between STEM education and entrepreneurship: Pathways to societal empowerment towards sustainability. Enhancing Entrepreneurial Mindsets Through STEM Education, 25-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17816-0_2
Richetin, J., Perugini, M., Adjali, I., & Hurling, R. (2008). Comparing leading theoretical models of behavioral predictions and post-behavior evaluations. Psychology and Marketing, 25(12), 1131-1150. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20257
Richetin, J., Sengupta, A., Perugini, M., Adjali, I., Hurling, R., Greetham, D., & Spence, M. (2010). A micro-level simulation for the prediction of intention and behavior. Cognitive Systems Research, 11(2), 181-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2009.08.001
Rodger, A., Vezevicius, A., & Papies, E. K. (2023). Can a simple plan change a complex behaviour? Implementation intentions in the context of water drinking. Appetite,183,106459. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/rafv6
Rodríguez-Molina, M.A., Frías-Jamilena, D.M., & Castañeda-García, J.A. (2013). The moderating role of past experience in the formation of a tourist destination's image and in tourists’ behavioural intentions. Current Issues in Tourism, 16(2), 107-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2012.665045
Rönkkö, M., & Cho, E. (2020). An updated guideline for assessing discriminant validity. Organizational Research Methods, 25(1), 6-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120968614
Sakiz, G., Pape, S. J., & Hoy, A. W. (2012). Does perceived teacher affective support matter for middle school students in mathematics classrooms? Journal of School Psychology, 50(2), 235-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2011.10.005
Sanders, M. (2009). STEM, STEM education, STEMmania. The Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20-26. https://www.teachmeteamwork.com/files/sanders.istem.ed.ttt.istem.ed.def.pdf
Santangelo, G. D., & Phene, A. (2021). Knowledge sourcing by the multinational enterprise: An individual creativity-based model. Journal of International Business Studies, 53(3), 434-448. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-021-00444-z
Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84(1), 1-66. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.84.1.1
Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. Psychology Press.
Selart, M., Nordström, T., Kuvaas, B., & Takemura, K. (2008). Effects of reward on self‐regulation, intrinsic motivation and creativity. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 52(5), 439-458. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830802346314
Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). Positive psychology: An introduction. Flow and the Foundations of Positive Psychology, 279-298. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9088-8_18
Shahid, S., & Paul, J. (2021). Intrinsic motivation of luxury consumers in an emerging market. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102531
Shang, X., Jiang, Z., Chiang, F.-K., Zhang, Y., & Zhu, D. (2023). Effects of robotics STEM camps on rural elementary students’ self-efficacy and computational thinking. Educational Technology Research and Development. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10191-7
Sharma, S. (1996). Applied multivariate techniques. (pp. 493). John Wiley and sons Press.
Sheeran, P., & Orbell, S. (1999). Augmenting the theory of planned behavior: Roles for anticipated regret and descriptive norms1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(10), 2107-2142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb02298.x
Shubina, I., & Kulakli, A. (2019). Pervasive learning and technology usage for creativity development in education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 14(01), 95. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i01.9067
Sickel, A. J. (2023). Fostering integrated STEM and entrepreneurial mindsets through design thinking. Enhancing Entrepreneurial Mindsets Through STEM Education, 267-292. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17816-0_12
Silver, E. A. (1997). Fostering creativity through instruction rich in mathematical problem solving and problem posing. Zentralblatt Für Didaktik Der Mathematik, 29(3), 75-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-997-0003-x
Silvia, P. J., Wigert, B., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Kaufman, J. C. (2012). Assessing creativity with self-report scales: A review and empirical evaluation. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(1), 19-34. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024071
Sommer, L. (2011). The theory of planned behaviour and the impact of past behaviour. International Business & Economics Research Journal, l(10), 91-110. https://doi.org/10.19030/iber.v10i1.930
Song, H., You, G.-J., Reisinger, Y., Lee, C.-K., & Lee, S.-K. (2014). Behavioral intention of visitors to an oriental medicine festival: An extended model of goal directed behavior. Tourism Management, 42, 101-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2013.11.003
Steinmetz, H., Knappstein, M., Ajzen, I., Schmidt, P., & Kabst, R. (2016). How effective are behavior change interventions based on the theory of planned behavior? A three-level meta-analysis. Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie-Journal of Psychology, 224(3), 216-233. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000255
Sternberg, R. J. & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defining the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. Free Press.
Stipek, D. (1995). The development of pride and shame in toddlers. In J. P. Tangney & K. W. Fischer (Eds.), Self-conscious emotions: The psychology of shame, guilt, embarrassment, and pride (pp. 237-252). Guilford Press.
Suram, S., & Bryden, K. M. (2015). Integrating a reduced-order model server into the engineering design process. Advances in Engineering Software, 90, 169-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.08.011
Sutton, S., McVey, D., & Glanz, A. (1999). A comparative test of the theory of reasoned action and the theory of planned behavior in the prediction of condom use intentions in a national sample of English young people. Health Psychology, 18(1), 72-81. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.18.1.72
Taherdoost, H., Sahibuddin, S., & Jalaliyoon, N. (2014). Exploratory factor analysis; concepts and theory, Advances in Applied and Pure Mathematics. Tavakol, M. and Dennick, 53(5), 375-382. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4178683
Tang, C., Duan, Q., & Long, H. (2022). How do parents influence student creativity? Evidence from a large-scale survey in China. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101134
Thaler, R.H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Yale Univ. Press
The State Information Center (2017). Entering a new stage in the history of the plan of encouraging people to start their own business and making innovation. http://www.sic.gov.cn/News/540/8400.htm.
Thibaut, L., Ceuppens, S., De Loof, H., De Meester, J., Goovaerts, L., Struyf, A., Boeve-de Pauw, J., Dehaene, W., Deprez, J., De Cock, M., Hellinckx, L., Knipprath, H., Langie, G., Struyven, K., Van de Velde, D., Van Petegem, P., & Depaepe, F. (2018). Integrated STEM education: A systematic review of instructional practices in secondary education. European Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 02. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/85525
Tulsi, P., Li, W. Y., & Kim, Y. G. (2022). Examining trekkers’ environmentally friendly behavior using an extended model of goal-directed behavior [MGB] and a new ecological paradigm scale [NEP]. E+M Ekonomie a Management, 25(4), 137-154. https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2022-4-009
Venkatesh, Morris, Davis, & Davis. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Verplanken, B., & Orbell, S. (2022). Attitudes, habits, and behavior change. Annual Review of Psychology, 73(1), 327-352. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-020821-011744
Vuletic, T., Duffy, A., Hay, L., McTeague, C., Pidgeon, L., & Grealy, M. (2018). The challenges in computer supported conceptual engineering design. Computers in Industry, 95, 22-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2017.11.003
Wallas, G. (1926). Stage in the creative process. The creativity question. Duke University Press.
Webster, C., MacDonald, R., & Simpson, M. (2006). Predicting criminality? risk factors, neighbourhood influence and desistance. Youth Justice, 6(1), 7-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473225406063449
Wei, X., Weng, D., Liu, Y., & Wang, Y. (2015). Teaching based on augmented reality for a technical creative design course. Computers &amp; Education, 81, 221-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.017
Weiner, B. (1972). Theories of motivation: From mechanism to cognition. Markham Press.
Wells, J. G. (2016). PIRPOSAL model of integrative STEM education: Conceptual and pedagogical framework for classroom implementation. The Technology and Engineering Teacher, 75(6), 12-19. https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/bitstream/handle/10919/96424/Wells_PIRPOSAL_March2016-TET.pdf
Wheaton, W. C. (1987). The cyclic behavior of the national office market. Real Estate Economics, 15(4), 281-299. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6229.00433
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68-81. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
Williams, L. J., & Hazer, J. T. (1986). Antecedents and consequences of satisfaction and commitment in turnover models: A reanalysis using latent variable structural equation methods. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(2), 219-231. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.2.219
Wood, K. R., Coplan, R. J., Hipson, W. E., & Bowker, J. C. (2022). Normative beliefs about social withdrawal in Adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 32(1), 372-381. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12617
Wu, M. (2022). Effects of feedback on individual creativity in social learning: an experimental study. Kybernetes. https://doi.org/10.1108/k-07-2021-0602
Xie, X., & Li, X. (2020). Exploration and practice of process assessment and evaluation method based on blended learning: Take programming courses as an example. 2020 2nd International Conference on Advances in Computer Technology, Information Science and Communications (CTISC).85-89. https://doi.org/10.1109/ctisc49998.2020.00021
Xu, X. J., & Chen, X. P. (2017). Unlocking expatriates’ job creativity: The role of cultural learning, and metacognitive and motivational cultural intelligence. Management and Organization Review, 13(4), 767-794. https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2017.50
Yao, Y., Wang, P., Jiang, Y., Li, Q., & Li, Y. (2022). Innovative online learning strategies for the successful construction of student self-awareness during the COVID-19 pandemic: Merging TAM with TPB. Journal of Innovation &amp; Knowledge, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100252
Zakeri, N. N. binti, Hidayat, R., Sabri, N. A. binti M., Yaakub, N. F. binti, Balachandran, K. S., & Azizan, N. I. binti. (2023). Creative methods in STEM for secondary school students: Systematic literature review. Contemporary Mathematics and Science Education, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.30935/conmaths/12601
Zhang, P., & Gheibi, S. (2015). From intrinsic motivation to employee creativity: The role of knowledge integration and team psychological safety. European Scientific Journal, 11, 380-392. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/328024907.pdf
Zhang, X. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: the influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal, 24(5), 107-128. https://doi.org/10.1108/dlo.2010.08124ead.007