簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 方挺
Ting Fang
論文名稱: 後設認知與語言學習策略在教室與電腦輔助發音學習使用研究
Classroom-based pronunciation training and computer-assisted pronunciation training: The role of metacognitive knowledge and strategies
指導教授: 林至誠
Lin, Chih-cheng
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 英語學系
Department of English
論文出版年: 2011
畢業學年度: 99
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 93
中文關鍵詞: 後設認知發音策略電腦輔助發音學習學習情境
英文關鍵詞: metacognitive knowledge, pronunciation strategy, computer-assisted pronunciation training (CAPT), learning contexts
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:266下載:24
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

本研究目的在探討語言學習者於不同情境下之後設認知與發音策略使用情形。在本研究中,主要探討兩種不同發音學習情境:第一種為傳統教室課堂發音學習,第二種為電腦輔助發音學習。共九十位學生參與本研究問卷回答,其中三十位只於教室課堂發音學習,另外三十位只使用發音學習軟體,最後三十位同時於教室課堂發音課與使用發音學習軟體學習。
本研究問卷分析結果如下:
第一、 在發音活動的選擇與使用次數上,傳統教室課堂發音學習與電腦輔助發音學習有顯著不同,課堂發音學習的活動次數高於電腦輔助發音學習。
第二、 對於只在單一發音學習情境下的學生,亦即只使用課堂發音學習或只使用電腦輔助發音學習的學生,經比較後,兩組學生之後設認知與發音策略使用情形並無顯著差異。
第三、 當學生同時於兩種發音學習情境下學習,其發音策略使用情形明顯優於只在單一發音學習情境下的學生。
第四、 同時於兩種發音學習情境下的學生,於兩種情境中大致顯露一致的發音策略使用,說明學生可能於不同情境相互轉換策略使用。
根據研究結果,本研究提出三項結論:第一、在後設認知與發音策略上,本研究中的電腦輔助發音學習與課堂發音學習並無差異,對於無法參與發音課程的學生,發音學習軟體亦可幫助建立策略使用能力,進而培養學習自主。第二、由於在課堂發音學習與電腦輔助發音學習中,後設認知與發音策略使用情形只稍微高於中間值,故建議讓學生同時在兩種情境下學習提升策略使用。另一方面,也可在課堂或教學軟體中提供有系統的發音策略教學。第三、除了一般音位辨別外,教師與學生都需注意不同母音及子音上本質的不同。

The present study was intended to investigate the effectiveness and nature of two learning contexts, computer-assisted pronunciation training (CAPT) and classroom-based pronunciation training (CBPT), in terms of learners’ metacognitive knowledge and strategies.
Ninety students participating in CAPT and/or CBPT were recruited to answer the questionnaires, including thirty students who used CBPT only; thirty students who used CAPT only; thirty students who used both CBPT and CAPT together.
The results show that first, learning activities were employed differently in CAPT and CBPT. Second, no significant difference was found in learners’ metacognitive knowledge and pronunciation strategy use between CAPT and CBPT. Third, when learners used both CAPT and CAPT together, they used pronunciation strategy more often than learners who used either one. Fourth, learners seemed to transfer their pronunciation strategy use from one context to the other when they used both CAPT and CBPT together.
Above all, the current study suggested that CAPT may simulate traditional pronunciation classroom teaching in terms of metacognition and pronunciation strategies. This could help learners who are not able to learn from pronunciation classes construct their autonomy outside the classroom. Besides, teachers or program designers need to raise learners’ metacognitive awareness and encourage their strategy use in pronunciation more effectively. One way to do this is through the use of both CAPT and CBPT altogether. Another way is to develop learners’ strategic competence embedded in the teaching curriculum or materials through different models of strategy instruction. Moreover, teachers and learners should emphasize more on qualitative features of language.

CHAPTER ONE ITRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background and motivation 1 1.2 Research question of the study 2 1.3 Significance of the study 3 1.4 Organization of the study 3 CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW 5 2.1 Issues in metacognitive knowledge and strategies 5 2.1.1 Flavell’ definition of metacognition 5 2.1.2 Components of metacognition 6 2.1.3 Metacognition and strategy use 7 2.2 Pronunciation in second language learning 7 2.2.1 Reasons for EFL learners’ difficulties in pronunciation 8 2.2.2 Two ideologies in pronunciation teaching 9 2.2.3 Learner centered pronunciation teaching 10 2.3 Classroom-based pronunciation training 12 2.3.1 Segmental teaching in the classroom 12 2.3.2 Pronunciation teaching beyond segmental in the classroom 13 2.3.3 Pronunciation feedback in the classroom 15 2.3.4 Pronunciation teaching from learners’ perspective 16 2.4 Computer-assisted pronunciation training 17 2.4.1 Advantages of CAPT 18 2.4.2 Limitations of CAPT 19 2.4.3 The role of feedback in CAPT 19 2.5 Related studies of pronunciation learning strategies 20 2.5.1 Pronunciation strategies in first language acquisition 20 2.5.2 Pronunciation strategies in second language acquisition 21 2.5.3 Pronunciation strategies along with other learning constructs 23 2.6 Reasons for the comparison of metacognition and strategy in CAPT and CBPT 26 CHAPTER THREE METHOD 27 3.1 Participants 27 3.2 Instruments 27 3.2.1 Pronunciation training classes 27 3.2.2 Computer-assisted pronunciation training programs 28 3.2.3 Pronunciation Strategies Survey (PSS) 29 3.2.4 Metacognitive Awareness of Pronunciation Inventory (MAPI) 29 3.2.5 List of pronunciation learning activities identification 30 3.3 Procedures 31 CHAPTER FOUR RESULTS 32 4.1 Pronunciation activities in CAPT and CBPT 32 4.2 Learners’ metacognitive awareness and strategy use in CAPT and CBPT 35 4.3 Meatcognitive awareness and strategy use for learners in both contexts 38 4.3.1 Learners’ metacognitive knowledge and strategies between CAPT and Both-A 39 4.3.2 Learners’ metacognitive knowledge and strategies between CBPT and Both-B 42 4.3.3 Metacognitive knowledge and strategies between Both-A and Both-B 45 CHAPTER FIVE DISCUSSION 47 5.1 Comparison of pronunciation learning activities between CAPT and CBPT 47 5.2 Comparison of meatcognition and strategy use between CAPT and CBPT 53 5.3 Influence of CAPT and CBPT on meatcognition and strategy (across groups) 56 5.4 Influence of CAPT and CBPT on meatcognition and strategy (in the group) 60 CHAPTER SIX CONCLUSION 65 6.1 Summaries of the findings in the current study 65 6.2 Pedagogical and theoretical implications 66 6.3 Limitations and suggestions for future research 68 REFERENCES 70 APPENDICES 82 Appendix A Summary of Studies of Pronunciation Strategies 82 Appendix B Pronunciation Strategies Survey (PSS) 86 Appendix C Metacognitive Awareness of Pronunciation Inventory (MAPI) 88 Appendix D List of pronunciation activities identification 93

Alexander, P. A., Schallet, D. L., & Hare, V. C. (1991). Coming to terms: How researchers in learning and literacy talk about knowledge. Review of Educational Research, 61, 345-343.
Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Asakawa, S., Minematsu, N., Isei-Jaakkola, T., & Hirose, K. (2005). Structural representation of the non-native pronunciations. Proceedings of Interspeech, 165-168.
Bacon, S. (1992). Phases of listening to authentic input in Spanish: A descriptive study. Foreign Language Annals, 25, 317-334.
Baker, L. (1989). Metacognition, comprehension monitoring, and the adult reader. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 3-38.
Berry, D. (2007). Health Communication: Theory and Practice. Maidenhead and New York: Open University Press.
Biersner, R. J. (1983). Factors related to English language pronunciation. The Journal of Psychology, 114, 281-291.
Binet, A. (1899). The Psychology of Reasoning: Based on Experimental Researches in Hypnotism. Chicago: Open Court.
Bohn, O.-S. (1995). Cross-language speech perception in adults: First language transfer doesn’t tell it all. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 279-304). Timonium, MD: York Press.
Bransford, J. D., & Schwarttz, D. (1999). Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. In A. Iran-Nejad & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Review of research in education (Vol. 24 pp. 61-100). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (Eds.). (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Breitkreutz, J., Derwing, T. M., & Rossiter, M. J. (2002). Pronunciation teaching practices in Canada. TESL Canada Journal, 19, 51-61.
Brown, A. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F.Weinert & R. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 65-116). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching. (4th ed.). NY: Longman.
Bruner, J. S. (1986). Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Campione, J. C., & Brown, A. L. (1987). Toward a theory of intelligence: Contributions from research with retarded children. Intelligence, 2, 279-304.
Chamot, A. U. (2004). Issues in language learning strategy research and teaching. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 1(1), 14-26.
Chamot, A. U. (2005). The Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach (CALLA): An update. In P.A. Richard-Amato & M.A. Snow (eds.), Academic success for English language learners: Strategies for K-12 mainstream teachers (pp. 87-101). White Plains, New York: Longman.
Chamot, A.U., Barnhardt, S., El-Dinary, P.B., & Robbins, J. (1999). The learning strategies handbook. White Plains, New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
Chan, A. Y. W. (2006). Strategies used by Cantonese speakers in pronouncing English initial consonant clusters: Insights into the interlanguage phonology of Cantonese ESL learners in Hong Kong. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 44(4), 331-355.
Chan, A. Y. W. (2010). Advanced Cantonese ESL learners’ production of English speech sounds: Problems and strategies. System, 38, 316-328.
Chela-Flores, B. (2001). Pronunciation and language learning: An integrative approach. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 39(2), 85-101.
Cohen, A.D. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language. London: Longman.
Couper, G.. (2003). The value of an explicit pronunciation syllabus in ESOL teaching. Prospect, 18(3), 53-70.
Deroo, O., Ris, C., Gielen, S., & Vanparis, J. (2000). Automatic detection of mispronounced phonemes for language learning tools. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, 681-684.
Derwing, T. M., & Murno, M. J. (2005). Second language accent and pronunciation teaching: A research-based approach. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 179-197.
Derwing, T. M., & Rossiter, M. J. (2002). ESL learners’ perceptions of their pronunciation needs and strategies. System, 30, 155-166.
Derwing, T. M., Murno, M. J., & Wiebe, G.. (1997). Pronunciation instruction for fossilized learners: Can it help? Applied Language Learning, 8(2), 217-235.
Derwing, T. M., Murno, M. J., & Wiebe, G.. (1998). Evidence in favor of a broad framework for pronunciation instruction. Language Learning, 48(3), 393-410.
Eckman, F. R. (1977). Markedness and the contrastive analysis hypothesis. Language Learning, 27, 315-330.
Eckstein, G. T. (2007). A correlation of pronunciation learning strategies with spontaneous English pronunciation of adult learners. Unpublished Master‘s Thesis. Brigham Young University, Provo, UT.
Elliott, A. R. (1995). Foreign language phonology: Field independence, attitude, and the success of formal instruction in Spanish pronunciation. Modern Language Journal, 79(4), 530-542.
Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Engwall, O., & Ba¨lter, O. (2007). Pronunciation feedback form real and virtual language teachers. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(3), 235-262.
Flavell, J. H. (1987). Speculations about the nature and development of metacognition. In F.Weinert & R. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 21-29). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Flege, J. E., & Fletcher, K. L. (1992). Talker and listener effects on degree of perceived foreign accent. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91, 370-389.
Flege, J. E., & Wang, C. (1989). Native language phonotactic constraints affect how well Chinese subjects the word final English /t/-/d/ contrast. Journal of Phonetics, 17, 299-315.
Flege, J. E., Murno, M., & MacKay, I. (1995). Factors affecting strength of perceived foreign accent in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97(5), 1-10.
Flege, J. E., Yeni-Komshian, G. H., & Liu, S. (1999). Age constraints on second language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 78-101.
Fromkin, V., Rodman, R, & Hyams, N (2003). An introduction to language (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Heinle.
Goh, G. (1997). Metacognitive awareness and second language listeners. ELT journal, 51, 361-369.
Gould, D., Kelly, D., Goldstone, L., & Gammon, J. (2001). Examining the validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales: Developing and using illustrated patient simulations to collect the data. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 10(5), 697-706.
Grenfell, M., & Harris, V. (1999). Modern languages and learning strategies: In theory and practice. London: Routledge.
Grew, J. H. (1964). Toward better classroom teaching. Modern Language Journal, 48(2), 83-88.
Hacker, D.J., Dunlosky, J., & Graesser, A. C. (1998). Metacognition in educational theory and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hammerly, H. (1973). The correction of pronunciation errors. Modern Language Journal, 57(3), 106-110.
Haslam, N. (2010). The relationship of three L2 learning factors with pronunciation proficiency: Language aptitude, strategy use, and learning context. Unpublished Master‘s Thesis. Brigham Young University, Provo, UT.
Haugen, E. (1956). Bilingualism in the Americas. The America Dialect Society, University of Alabama.
He, Y., Wang, Q., & Anderson, R. C. (2005). Chinese children’s use of subcharacter information about pronunciation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(4), 572-579.
Hillenbrand, J. M., & Clark, M. J. (2000). Some effects of duration on vowel recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 108, 3013-3022.
Jacobs, J. E., & Paris, S. G. (1987). Children’s metacognition about reading : Issues in definition, measurement, and instruction. Educational Psychologist, 22, 225-278.
Jenkins, J. (2000). The phonology of English as an international language. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Jenkins, J. (2002). A sociolinguistically based, empirically researched pronunciation syllabus for English as an international language. Applied Linguistics, 23(1), 83-103.
Johnson, Karen E., Patricia Dunkel, & Deborah Rekart. (1991). Computer-assisted English pronunciation training. Paper presented at the Third National Conference on the Training and Employment of Graduate Teaching Assistants.
Joseph, N. (2010). Metacognition needed: Teaching middle and high school students to develop strategic learning skills. Preventing School Failure, 54(2), 99-103.
Judd, C. H. (1908). The relation of special training to general intelligence. Educational Review, 36, 28-42.
Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). TESOL methods: Changing tracks, challenging trends. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 59-81.
Lenneberg, E. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley and Sons.
Leonsario, R. J., & Nelson, T. O. (1990). Do different metamemory judgments tap the same underlying aspects of memory? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 464-470.
Levis, J. M. (2005). Changing contexts and shifting paradigms in pronunciation teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 369-377.
Lin, H., Fan, C., & Chen, C. (1995). Teaching Pronunciation in the Learner-Centered Classroom. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED393292)
Lleó, C. (1990). Homonymy and reduplication: On the extended availability of two strategies in phonological acquisition. Journal of Child Language, 17(2), 267-278.
Macdonald, D., Yule, G.., & Powers, M. (1994). Attempts to improve English L2 pronunciation: The variable effects of different types of instruction. Language Learning, 44, 75-100.
MacDonald, S. (2002). Pronunciation—views and practices of reluctant teachers. Prospect, 17(3), 3-18.
Mackey, W. F. (1965). Language teaching analysis. London: Longmans.
McNerney, M., & Mendelsohn, D. (1987). Putting suprasegmentals in their place. TESL Talk, 17(1), 132-140.
Mills, S. V., & Plonsky, L. (2007). Empowering students with language learning strategies: A critical review of current issues. Foreign Language Annals, 40(3), 535-548.
Morley, J. (1991). The pronunciation component in teaching English to speakers of other languages. TESOL Quarterly, 25(3), 481-507.
Moyer, A. (1999). Ultimate attainment in L2 phonology: The critical factors of age, motivation, and instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(1), 81-108.
Murno, M, & Derwing, T. (1999). Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 49(Supp. 1), 285-310.
Murno, M. J. (1995). Nonsegmental factors in foreign accent: Ratings of filtered speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17(1), 17-34.
Neri, A., Cucchiarini, C. and Strik, H. (2002) Feedback in Computer Assisted Pronunciation Training: Technology Push or Demand Pull? Proceedings of ICSLP 2002:1209–1212.
Neri, A., Cucchiarini, C., Strik, H., & Boves, L. (2002). The pedagogy-technology interface in computer-assisted pronunciation training. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15(5), 441-467.
Neri, A., Mich, O., Gerosa, M., & Giuliani, D. (2008). The effectiveness of computer assisted pronunciation training for foreign language learning by children. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(5), 393-408.
O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
O'Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: CUP.
Osburne, A. G.. (2003). Pronunciation strategies of advanced ESOL learners. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 41(2), 131-143.
Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
Paris, S. G., & Winograd, P. (1990). How metacognition can promote academic learning and instruction. In B. F. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimension of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 15-51). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Patkowski, M. S. (1990). Age and accent in second language: A Reply to James Emil Flege. Applied Linguistics, 11, 73-89.
Pennington, M. C. (1989). Teaching pronunciation from the top down. RELC Journal, 20(1), 120-138.
Pennington, M. C. (1999). Computer-aided pronunciation pedagogy: Promise, limitations, directions. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 12(5), 427-440.
Perlmutter, M. (1989). Intelligibility rating of L2 speech pre- and post-intervention. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 68, 515-521.
Peterson, S.S. (2000). Pronunciation learning strategies: A first look. Unpublished Research Report.
Phye, G. D. (1992). Strategic transfer: A tool for academic problem solving. Educational Psychology Review, 4, 292-421.
Phye, G. D. (2001). Problem-solving instruction and problem-solving transfer: The correspondence issue. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 571-578.
Pressley, M., & Ghatala, E. S. (1990). Self-regulated learning: Monitoring learning from text. Educational Psychologist, 25, 19-33.
Ryan, J. J. (1970). Transfer of training: Subject matter. In S. Smith (Ed.), Educational psychology (pp. 117-137). NY: Barnes and Noble Books.
Salomon, G.., & Perkins, D. N. (1989). Rocky roads to transfer: Rethinking mechanisms of a neglected phenomenon. Educational Psychologist, 24, 113-142.
Scales, J., Wennerstrom, A., Richard, D., & Wu, S. H. (2006). Language learners’ perceptions of accents. TESOL Quarterly, 40(4), 715-738.
Scarcella, R., & Oxford, R. L. (1994). Second language pronunciation: State of the art in instruction. System, 22(2), 221-230.
Schoonen, R., & de Glopper, K. (1996). Writing performance and knowledge about writing. In G. Rijlaarsdam, H. van den Bergh & M. Couzijn (Eds.), Theories, models, and methodology in writing research (pp. 87-107). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Schoonen, R., Hulstijn, J., & Bossers, B. (1998). Metacognitive and language-specific knowledge in native and foreign language reading comprehension: An empirical study among Dutch students in grades 6, 8 and 10. Language Learning, 48(1), 71-106.
Schoonen, R., van Gelderen, A., de Glopper, K., Hulstijn, J., Simis, A., Snellings, P., & Stevenson, M. (2003). First language and second language writing: The role of linguistic knowledge, speed of processing, and metacognitive knowledge. Language Learning, 53(1), 165-202.
Schraw, G. (2001). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. In H. J. Hartman (Ed.), Metacognition in learning and instruction: Theory, research and practice (pp. 3-16). Boston: Kluwer.
Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460-475.
Schwartz, Arthur H., J. Markoff, J. & N. Jain. (1991). Intensive instruction for accent modification. Paper presented at the Third National Conference on the Training and Employment of Graduate Teaching Assistants.
Scovel, T. (2000). A critical review of the critical period research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 20, 213–223.
Seifert, K. L. (1991). Educational Psychology. (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 10, 209-231.
Sinclair, J., & Coulthard, R. M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sperling, R. A., Howard, B. C., Staley, R., & Dubois, N. (2004). Metacognition and self-regulated learning constructs. Educational Research and Evaluation, 10(2), 117-139.
Stenson, N., Downing, B., Simith, J., & Smith, K. (1992). The effectiveness of computer-assisted pronunciation training. CALICO Journal 9(4), 5-19.
Swanson, H. L. (1990). Influence of metacognitive knowledge and aptitude on problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 306-314.
Thompson, I. (1991). Foreign accents revisited: The English pronunciation of Russian immigrants. Language Learning, 47, 177-203.
Thorndike, E. L. (1913). The psychology of learning. NY: Teachers College Press.
Thorndike, E. L. (1932). The Fundamentals of Learning. NY: Teachers College Press.
Trubetzkoy, N. (1958). Grundzuge der phonologie. Travaux de phonologie. Paris: Klincksieck.
Ushioda, E. (2006). Motivation, autonomy, and sociocultural theory. In P. Benson (ed.), Learner autonomy 8: Insider perspectives on autonomy in language teaching and learning. (pp. 5-24.). Dublin: Authentik.
Van Laerhoven H., van der Zaag-Loonen H. J., & Derkx B. H. F. (2004). A comparison of Likert scale and visual analogue scales as response options in children’s questionnaires. Acta Paediatrica 93, 830-835.
Vandergrift, L., Goh, C., Mareschal, C., & Tafaghodtari, M. (2006). The metacognitive awareness listening questionnaire: Development and validation. Language Learning, 56 (3), 431-462.
Victori, M. (1999). An analysis of writing knowledge in EFL composing: A case study of two effective and two less effective writers. System, 27, 537-555.
Wang, J., & Munro, M. J. (2004). Computer-based training for learning English vowel contrasts. System, 32, 539–552.
Wenden, A. (1998). Metacognitive knowledge and language learning. Applied Linguistics, 19, 515-537.
Wennerstrom, A. (1998). Intonation as cohesion in academic discourse: A study of Chinese speakers of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20(1), 1-25.
Witt, S., & Young, S. (1997, April). Compute-assisted pronunciation teaching based on automatic speech recognition. Paper presented at the Conference on Language Teaching and Language Technology.
Woolfolk, A. (2007). Educational psychology. (10th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Yeni-Komshian, G.., Flege, J. E., & Liu, S. (2000). Pronunciation proficiency in first and second languages of Korean-English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3, 131-149.

下載圖示
QR CODE