簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 詹雨臻
Chan, Yu-Chen
論文名稱: 語文笑話的認知與情緒歷程:功能性磁振造影研究
The Cognitive and Emotional Processing of Verbal Jokes: An fMRI Study
指導教授: 陳學志
Chen, Hsueh-Chih
葉玉珠
Yeh, Yu-Chu
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 教育心理與輔導學系
Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling
論文出版年: 2011
畢業學年度: 99
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 69
中文關鍵詞: 功能性磁振造影花園路徑句失諧未解困笑話的神經迴路模型幽默
英文關鍵詞: fMRI, garden path sentence, nonsensical, neural circuit model of joke, humor
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:221下載:9
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 不論是古今或中外,幽默在人類的生理健康、心理調適和社交上,皆扮演重要的角色。因此,探討幽默歷程及其神經機制的研究蔚為風氣。近年來,先進的功能性磁振造影技術已經促使研究者以更有效的方法探討幽默歷程的大腦神經機制。過去的幽默研究,發現大腦進行幽默理解和幽默欣賞時,分別對應到不同的腦區。然而上述這些研究,大多以「幽默」和「非幽默」的條件相比,故其大腦的活化同時混雜著幽默的認知和情緒歷程,無法明確區分幽默理解的認知歷程與幽默欣賞的情緒成份之神經機制。因此,本研究採用過去幽默研究從未使用的實驗設計,在笑話語句與一般句之外,加入「花園路徑句」條件,以區分幽默的「認知成份」和「情緒成份」的神經機制。
    此外,幽默的認知歷程可再細分為「失諧」和「解困」的歷程,然而過去的研究囿於刺激材料和實驗設計的限制,無法明確區分失諧與解困歷程所對應的神經機制。因此,本研究採用語文笑話,並改寫關鍵語句來操弄三種刺激類型:未失諧、失諧未解困、失諧解困。經由上述三類刺激的比較,可以更精細區分「失諧」和「解困」認知歷程的神經機制。
    本研究以事件關聯功能性磁振造影技術進行兩個實驗,實驗一旨在區分笑話中「認知成份」和「情緒成份」的神經機制,結果發現,幽默的認知成份引發語義統整在左側額上回和雙側的額下回有較大的活化。在故事主角的人格特質推論下有較大活化在左側角回、左側額上回、雙側顳下回和右側顳中回;在解困後,引發好笑愉悅的幽默情緒成份在海馬旁回和前扣帶回有較大的活化。
    實驗二將幽默認知歷程再細分為「失諧」和「解困」,旨在探討這兩個認知歷程的神經機制。結果發現,「失諧」歷程在右側顳中回有較大的活化。「解困」歷程在左側額上回及左側頂下葉有較大的活化。 
    綜上所述,相較於過去的幽默研究,本研究的實驗設計有所突破,更能釐清且區分幽默的「認知成份」與「情緒成份」之神經機制,且在幽默理解可再區分出「失諧」和「解困」的歷程,對於瞭解幽默的神經機制具有重大的貢獻。未來研究可再進一步比較幽默與情緒調節的效果。其次,本研究採用二段式笑話結構,未來可直接使用三段式笑話結構,從刺激材料更能清楚區分失諧和解困的歷程。再者,本研究的參與者皆為一般正常人,未來可和不同族群進行比較,例如:比較一般生與亞斯伯格者在笑話中認知與情緒歷程之神經運作機制。

    Humor plays a crucial role in the physical, psychological, and social well-being of all human beings, regardless of time and place. Consequently, extensive research and experimentation has been performed focusing on comprehending the humor process and its neural substrates. In recent years, technical advances in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) have enabled researchers to more effectively investigate the neural substrates of humor processing. Previous studies have discovered that humor comprehension and humor appreciation appear to be managed by different brain regions. However, most of the preceding studies have explored this topic by contrasting “funny” and “unfunny” conditions. These two conditions both activate brain regions involved with the processing of the cognitive and emotional aspects of humor and thus do not allow for the identification of the distinct neural substrates underlying each of these taken as separate sets of processes. To overcome this difficulty, this study was the first to adapt an experimental designed to identify the distinct neural substrates of cognitive and emotional processing. This is done through the incorporation of a “garden path sentence”.
    A further obstacle encountered in the previous research is that it has been difficult to clearly identify the neural substrates contributing to the subdivision of “incongruity” detection and “resolution.” To further investigate this, this present study rewrote the punch lines of verbal jokes to generate stimuli jokes of three types: incongruity-removed (unfunny), resolution-removed (nonsensical), and incongruous resolution jokes (funny). By contrasting the results from these three types, it was possible to clearly identify the neural substrates of the cognitive processes associated with incongruity detection and resolution.
    The purpose of experiment 1 was to identify the distinct neural substrates associated with cognitive processing and emotional processing. The comprehension-elaboration theory of humor claims that the elicitation of humor can be segregated into two stages, comprehension and elaboration. Comprehension includes detection and resolution of incongruity, and elaboration involves inferences concerning the agents and objects in the story and inducement of the experience of amusement.
    Previous imaging research has sought to identify the neural substrates of humor processing by comparing funny and unfunny conditions. However, such studies have not been able to segregate the comprehension and elaboration stages. The present study was designed to differentiate the respective brain areas corresponding to comprehension and elaboration with an additional condition, garden path sentences.The results suggest that the left superior frontal gyrus (SFG), bilateral inferior frontal gyri (IFG), and caudate may be associated with humor comprehension, whereas the left angular gyrus, left SFG, bilateral inferior temporal gyri (ITG), and right middle temporal gyrus (MTG) may be responsible for personality-related inferences during the elaboration process. In addition, the feeling of amusement appears to be associated with increased activity in a network of subcortical regions, including the parahippocampal gyrus and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC).
    The target of experiment 2 was to further distinguish neural substrates in the cognitive processing of the detection and the resolution of incongruities. The incongruity-resolution theory states that joke comprehension consists of two stages: incongruity detection and incongruity resolution. However, few fMRI studies on joke comprehension have examined the differential neurological substrates of humor processing for these two stages. The present study utilized an event-related fMRI design incorporating three conditions (funny, unfunny, and nonsensical) to examine distinct brain regions associated with the detection and the resolution of incongruities. Stimuli in the funny condition contained resolvable incongruities; stimuli in the nonsensical condition contained unresolvable incongruities; while stimuli in the unfunny condition contained no incongruities.The results showed that the detection of incongruities was associated with greater activation in the right MTG, and the resolution of incongruities with greater activation in the left SFG and left inferior parietal lobule (IPL). A parametric analysis additionally showed that the ACC was activated in relation to subjective comprehensibility, suggesting a key role in producing the experience of amusement or humor appreciation after humor comprehension. Our findings provide an advanced understanding of the neurological mechanisms of incongruity detection and resolution during humor comprehension.
    In summary, this study provides a breakthrough in experimental design in humor research, with the potential to allow for the identification of the neural substrates of the cognitive components and emotional components of humor, and the “incongruity” and “resolution” processes associated with humor comprehension. By comparing the neural substrates associated with the processing of jokes, this study also contributes to understanding the neural substrate of humor. It is demonstrated that humor cognition and emotion highly activate distinctive areas in the cortex and subcortex, and by observing changes in the areas activated during shifts of emotional states, we were able to associate humor comprehension and appreciation processes with different brain areas. Extended studies in this topic could be conducted by comparing the effectiveness of humor and emotion regulation. Additionally, this study adopted a two-stage joke structure in the experiment, which could also be replaced with a three-stage joke structure to clearly trace the incongruity and resolution process. Finally, the participants in this study were all ‘normal’ people. The data could thus be used as a baseline against which results from participants with Asperger’s syndrome could be compared to further investigate the neural substrates of cognitive and emotional processing of verbal jokes in different groups.

    Acknowledgments i 摘要 iii Abstract v Table of Contents ix List of Tables xi List of Figures xiii Research motive and purpose 1 Experiment 1: Segregating the Comprehension and Appreciation Processing of Verbal Jokes: An fMRI Study 9 1. Introduction 9 2. Material and methods 13 2.1. Participants 13 2.2. Stimuli 14 2.3. Experimental paradigm 16 2.4. Image acquisition 17 2.5. Image analysis 18 3. Result 20 3.1. Behavioral results 20 3.2. fMRI results 20 4. Discussion 23 5. Conclusions 27 Experiment 2: Neural Substrates of Incongruity Detection and Resolution during Humor Comprehension: An fMRI Study 29 1. Introduction 29 2. Material and methods 34 2.1. Participants 34 2.2. Stimuli 35 2.3. Experimental paradigm 37 2.4. Image acquisition 38 2.5. Image analysis 39 3. Result 40 3.1. Behavioral results 40 3.2. fMRI results 40 4. Discussion 43 5. Conclusions 48 General discussion 51 References 59 Appendix: 69

    Aggleton, J. P., & Young, A. W. (2000). The enigma of the amygdala: On its contribution to human emotion. In R. D. Lane & L. Nadel (Eds.), Cognitive neuroscience of emotion (pp. 106-128). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    Ahrens, K., Liu, H. L., Lee, C. Y., Gong, S. P., Fang, S. Y., & Hsu, Y. Y. (2007). Functional MRI of conventional and anomalous metaphors in Mandarin Chinese. Brain and Language, 100, 163-171.
    Apter, M. J. (1982). The experience of motivation: The theory of psychological reversals. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
    Ashwin, C., Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., O’Ridordan, M., & Bullmore, E. T. (2007). Differential activation of the amygdala and the ‘social brain’ during fearful face-processing in Asperger Syndrome. Neuropsychologia, 45, 2-14.
    Asperger, H. (1944). Die ‘‘Autistischen Psychopathen’’ im Kindesalter. Archiv für Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten, 117, 76-136.
    Azim, E., Mobbs, D., Jo, B., Menon, V., & Reiss, A. L. (2005). Sex differences in brain activation elicited by humor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(45), 16496-16501.
    Baron-Cohen, S., Ring, H., Chitnis, X., Wheelwright, S., Gregory, L., Williams, S … Bullmore, E. (2006). fMRI of parents of children with Asperger Syndrome: A pilot study. The Cognitive Neuroscience of Asperger Syndrome, 61(1), 122-130.
    Bartolo, A., Benuzzi, F., Nocetti, L., Baraldi, P., & Nichelli, P. (2006). Humor comprehension and appreciation: An fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(11), 1789-1798.
    Bennett, M. P., & Lengacher, C. (2007). Humor and laughter may influence health: III. Laughter and health outcomes. Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 5(1), 37-40.
    Berns, G. S. (2004). Something funny happened to reward. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(5), 193-194.
    Bihrle, A. M., Brownell, H. H., Powelson, J. A., & Gardner, H. (1986). Comprehension of humorous and nonhumorous materials by left and right brain-damaged patients. Brain Cognition, 5(4), 399-411.
    Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., Schlesewsky, M. (2009). Processing syntax and morphology: A neurocognitive perspective. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (2007). The International Affective Picture System (IAPS) in the study of emotion and attention. In J. A. Coan and J. J. B. Allen (Eds.), Handbook of Emotion Elicitation and Assessment (pp. 29-46). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Brownell, H. H., & Stringfellow, A. (2000). Cognitive perspectives on humor comprehension after brain injury. In L. T. Connor & L. K. Obler (Eds.), Neurobehavior of language and cognition: Studies of normal aging and brain damage (pp. 241-258). Boston: Kluwer Academic.
    Brownell, H. H., Michel, D., Powelson, J., & Gardner, H. (1983). Surprise but not coherence: Sensitivity to verbal humor in right-hemisphere patients. Brain and Language, 18(1), 20-27.
    Brownell, H., & Stringfellow, A. (2002). Cognitive perspectives on humor comprehension after brain injury. Neurobehavior of Language and Cognition, 4, 241-258.
    Calder, A. J., Lawrence, A. D., & Young, A. W. (2001). Neuropsychology of fear and loathing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2(5), 352-363.
    Chan, A. H. D., Liu, H. L., Yip, V., Fox, P. T., Gao, J. H., Tan, L. H. (2004). Neural systems for word meaning modulated by semantic ambiguity. NeuroImage, 22, 1128-1133.
    Chen, H. C., Cheng, C. M., Liang, K. C., Chan, Y. C., Cho, S. L., & Lin, C. Y. (2011, under submit). The cognitive anatomy of humor: Segregating incongruity and resolution processing- an fMRI study. Neurorepot.
    Christensen, K. R. (2010). Syntactic reconstruction and reanalysis, semantic dead ends, and prefrontal cortex. Brain and Cognition, 73(1), 41-50.
    Copland, D. A., Chenery, H. J., & Murdoch, B. E. (2000). Processing lexical ambiguities in word triplets: Evidence of lexical-semantic deficits following dominant nonthalamic subcortical lesions. Neuropsychology, 14(3), 379-390.
    Copland, D. A., Chenery, H. J., & Murdoch, B. E. (2002). Hemispheric contributions to lexical ambiguity resolution: Evidence from individuals with complex language impairment following left-hemisphere lesions. Brain and Language, 81, 131-143.
    Coulson, S., & Lovett, C. (2004). Handedness, hemispheric asymmetry, and joke comprehension. Cognitive Brain Research, 19, 275-288.
    Dilger, S., Straube, T., Mentzel, H. J., Fitzek, C., Reichenbach, J. R., Hecht, H., …Miltner, W. H. R. (2003). Brain activation to phobia-related pictures in spider phobic humans: An event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neuroscience Letters, 348(1), 29-32.
    Ekman, P. (1972). Universals and cultural differences in facial expressions of emotion. In J. Cole (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (pp. 207-283). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
    Ekman, P. (1973). Darwin and facial expression: A century of research in review. New York: Academic Press.
    Ekman, P., & Heider, K. G. (1988). The universality of a contempt expression: A replication. Motivation and Emotion, 12, 303-308.
    Ellis, H. D., Ellis, D. M., Fraser, W., & Deb, S. (1994). A preliminary study of right hemisphere cognitive deficits and impaired social judgments among young people with Aspergersyndrome. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 3, 255-266.
    Emery, N. J., & Amaral, D. G. (2000). The role of the amygdala in primate social cognition. In R. D. Lane & L. Nadel (Eds.), Cognitive neuroscience of emotion (pp. 156-191). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    Eysenck, H. J. (1942). The appreciation of humour: An experimental and theoretical study. British Journal of Psychology, 32, 295-309.
    Ferstl, E. C., Rinck, M., von Cramon, D. Y. (2005). Emotional and temporal aspects of situation model processing during text comprehension: An event-related fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(5), 724-739.
    Fox, E. (2008). Emotion science: Cognitive and neuroscientific approaches to understanding human emotions. London: Palgrave Machmillan.
    Fried, I., Katz, A., McCarthy, G., Sass, K. J., Williamson, P., Spencer, S. S., & Spencer, D. D. (1991). Functional organization of human supplementary motor cortex studied by electrical stimulation by electrical stimulation. The Journal of neuroscience, 11(11), 3656-3666.
    Fried, I., Wilson, C. L., MacDonald, K. A., & Behnke, E. J. (1998). Electric current stimulates laughter. Nature, 391, 650.
    Frith, U. (1989). Autism: Explaining the Enigma. Oxford: Blackwell.
    Gallagher, H. L., Happe, F., Brunswick, N., Fletcher, P. C., Frith, U., & Frith, C. D. (2000). Reading the mind in cartoons and stories: An fMRI study of ‘theory of mind’ in verbal and nonverbal tasks. Neuropsychologia, 38, 11-21.
    Gardner, H., Ling, P. K., Flamm, L., & Silverman, J. (1975). Comprehension and appreciation of humorous material following brain damage. Brain, 98, 399-412.
    Giuliani, N. R., McRae, K., & Gross, J. J. (2008). The up- and down-regulation of amusement: Experiential, behavioral, and autonomic consequences. Emotion, 8(5), 714-719.
    Goel, V., & Dolan, R. J. (2001). The functional anatomy of humor: Segregating cognitive and affective components. Nature Neuroscience, 4(3), 237-238.
    Goel, V., & Dolan, R. J. (2007). Social regulation of affective experience of humor. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(9), 1574-1580.
    Gross, J. J., & Thompson, R. A. (2007). Emotion regulation: Conceptual foundation. In J. J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 3-24). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
    Happe, F., Brownell, H., & Winner, E. (1999). Acquired ‘theory of mind’ impairments following stroke. Cognition, 70, 211-240.
    Happeti, F. (1997). Central coherence and theory of mind in autism: reading homographs in context. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 15, 1-2.
    Hariri, A. R., Venkata, V. S., Tessitore, A., Fere, F., & Weinberger, D. R. (2003). Neocortical modulation of the amygdala response to fearful stimuli. Biological Psychiatry, 53(6), 494-501.
    Henman, L. D. (2001). Humor as a coping mechanism: Lessons from POWs. Humor, 14, 83-94.
    Howe, N. E. (2002). The origin of humor. Medical Hypotheses, 59(3), 252-254.
    Huettel, S. A., Song, A. W., & McCarthy, G. (2009). Functional magnetic resonance imaging (2nd edition). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
    Ishai, A., Ungerleider, L. G., & Haxby, J. V. (2000). Distributed neural systems for the generation of visual images. Neuron, 28, 979-990.
    Iwase, M., Ouchi, Y., Okada, H., Yokoyama, C., Nobezawa, S., Yoshikawa, E., …Watanabe, Y. (2002). Neural substrates of human facial expression of pleasant emotion induced by comic films: A PET study. NeuroImage, 17(2), 758-768.
    Jolliffe, T., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2000). Linguistic processing in high-functioning adults with autism or Asperger's syndrome. Is global coherence impaired? Psychol Med, 30(5), 1169-1187.
    Jung, W. E. (2003). The inner eye theory of laughter: Mindreader signals cooperator value. Evolutionary Psychology, 1, 214-253.
    Jung-Beeman, M. (2005). Bilateral brain processes for comprehending natural language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(11), 512-518
    Karlsson, K. A. E., Windischberger, C., Gerstl, F., Mayr, W., Siegel, J. M., & Moser, E. (2010). Modulation of hypothalamus and amygdalar activation levels with stimulus valence. NeuroImage, 51(1), 324-328.
    Katz, B. (1993). A neural resolution of the incongruity and incongruity-resolution theories of humour. Connection Science, 5, 59-75.
    Kim, S. H., & Hamann, S. (2007). Neural correlates of positive and negative emotion regulation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 776-798.
    Knutson, B., Adams, C. M., Fong, G.W., & Hommer, D. (2001). Anticipation of increasing monetary reward selectively recruits nucleus accumbens. Journal of Neuroscience, 21, RC159.
    Kohn, N., Kellermann, T., Gur, R. C., Schneider, F., & Habel, U. (2011). Gender differences in the neural correlates of humor processing: Implications for different processing modes. Neuropsychologia, 49(5), 888-897.
    Leacock, S. (1937). Humor and humanity: An introduction to the study of humor. London: Thornton & Butterworth.
    Lefcourt, H. M., Davidson-Katz, K., & Kueneman, K. (1990). Humor and immune-system functioning. Humor, 3(3), 305-321.
    Lyons, V., & Fitzgerald, M. (2004). Humor in autism and Asperger syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disords, 34(5), 521-531.
    Marcus, M. P. (1974). Wait-and-see strategies for parsing natural language. MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Working Papers. Retrieved from http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/41110
    Marinkovic, K., Baldwin, S., Courtney, M., Witzel, T., Dale, A., & Halgren, E. (2011). Right hemisphere has the last laugh: Neural dynamics of joke appreciation. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 11(1), 113-130.
    Marjoram, D., Job, D. E., Whalley, H. C., Gountouna, V. E., McIntosh, A. M., Simonotto, E., …Lawrie, S. (2006). A visual joke fMRI investigation into theory of mind and enhanced risk of schizophrenia. NeuroImage, 31(4), 1850-1858.
    Martin, R. A. (2007). The psychology of humor: An integrative approach. Oxford: Academic Press.
    Mason, R. A., & Just, M. A. (2007). Lexical ambiguity in sentence comprehension. Brain Research, 1146, 115-127.
    Mobbs, D., Greicius, M. D., Abdel-Azim, E., Menon, V., & Reiss, A. L. (2003). Humor modulates the mesolimbic reward centers. Neuron, 40(5), 1041-1048.
    Mobbs, D., Hagan, C. C., Azim, E., Menon, V., & Reiss, A. L. (2005). Personality predicts activity in reward and emotional regions associated with humor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(45), 16502-16506.
    Moran, J. M., Wig, G. S., Adams, R. B. Jr., Janata, P., & Kelley, W. M. (2004). Neural correlates of humor detection and appreciation. NeuroImage, 21(3), 1055-1060.
    Nevo, O., Keinan, G., & Teshimovsky-Arditi, M. (1993). Humor and pain tolerance. Humor, 6, 71-88.
    Newman, A. J., Pancheva, R., Ozawa, K., Neville, H. J., & Ullman, M. T. (2001). An event-related fMRI study of syntactic and semantic violations. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30(3), 339-364.
    Oatley, K., Keltner, D., & Jenkins, J. M. (2006). Understanding emotions (2nd edition). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
    Ochsner, K. N., Bunge, S. A., Gross, J. J., & Gabrieli, J. (2002). Rethinking feelings: An fMRI study of the cognitive regulation of emotion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(8), 1215-1229.
    Ochsner, K. N., Ludlow, D. H., Knierim, K., Hanelin, J., Ramachandran, T., Glover, G. C., Mackey, S. C. (2006). Neural correlates of individual differences in pain-related fear and anxiety. Pain, 120, 69-77.
    Ochsner, K. N., Ray, R. D., Cooper, J. C., Robertson, E. R., Chopra, S., Gabrieli, J. D., & Gross, J. J. (2004). For better or for worse: Neural systems supporting the cognitive down- and up-regulation of negative emotion. NeuroImage, 23, 483-499.
    Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-113.
    Ortony, A., Clore, G. L., & Collins, A. (1988). The cognitive structure of emotions. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
    Ozawa, F., Matsuo, K., Kato, C., Nakai, T., Isoda, H., Takehara, Y., …Sakahara, H. (2000). The effects of listening comprehension of various genres of literature on response in the linguistic area: An fMRI study. NeuroReport, 11, 1141-1143.
    Park, J. Y., Gu, B. M., kang, D. H., Shin, Y. W., Choi, C. H., Lee, J. M., & Kwon, J. S. (2010). Integration of cross-modal emotional information in the human brain: An fMRI study. Cortex, 46(2), 161-169.
    Parvizi, J., Anderson, S. W., Martin, C. O., Damasio, H., & Damasio, A. R. (2001). Pathological laughter and crying: A link to the cerebellum. Brain, 124, 1708-1719.
    Rapp, A. M., Wild, B., Erb, M., Rodden, F. A., Ruch, W., & Grodd, W. (2008). Trait cheerfulness modulates BOLD response in lateral cortical but not limbic brain areas- A pilot fMRI study. Neuroscience Letters, 445(3), 242-245.
    Reiss, A. L., Hoeft, F., Tenforde, A. S., Chen, W., Mobbs, D., & Mignot, E. J. (2008). Anomalous hypothalamic responses to humor in cataplexy. PLoS One, 3(5), e2225.
    Ruby, P. P., & Decety, J. J. (2001). Effect of subjective perspective taking during simulation of action: A PET investigation of agency. Nature Neuroscience, 4(5), 546-550.
    Ruch, W. (1992). Assessment of appreciation of humor: Studies with the 3WD Humor Test. In C. D. Spielberger & J. N. Butcher (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 9, pp. 27-75). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Samson, A. C., & Hegenloh, M. (2010). Stimulus characteristics affect humor processing in individuals with Asperger syndrome. Journal Autism Developmental Disorder, 40(4), 438-447.
    Samson, A. C., & Hegenloh, M. (2010). Stimulus Characteristics Affect Humor Processing in Individuals with Asperger Syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40(4) 438-447.
    Samson, A. C., Hempelmann, C. F., Huber, O., & Zysset, S. (2009). Neural substrates of incongruity-resolution and nonsense humor. Neuropsychologia, 47(4), 1023-1033.
    Samson, A. C., Zysset, S., & Huber, O. (2008). Cognitive humor processing: Different logical mechanisms in nonverbal cartoons- an fMRI study. Social Neuroscience, 3(2), 125-140.
    Sander, K., & Scheich, H. (2001). Auditory perception of laughing and crying activates human amygdala regardless of attentional state. Cognitive Brain Research, 12(2), 181-198.
    Schwartz, S., Ponz, A., Poryazova, R., Werth, E., Boesiger, P., Khatami, R., & Bassetti, C. L. (2008). Abnormal activity in hypothalamus and amygdala during humour processing in human narcolepsy with cataplexy. Brain, 131(2), 514-522.
    Shammi, P., & Stuss, D. T. (1999). Humour appreciation: A role of the right frontal lobe. Brain, 122(4), 657-666.
    Shibata, M., Toyomura, A., Itoh, H., & Abe, J. (2010). Neural substrates of irony comprehension: A functional MRI study. Brain Research, 1308, 114-123.
    Shultz, T. R., & Horibe, F. (1974). Development of appreciation of verbal jokes. Developmental Psychology, 10(1), 13-20.
    Stowe, L. A., Paans, A. M. J., Wijers, A. A., & Zwarts, F. (2004). Activations of “motor” and other non-language structures during sentence comprehension. Brain and Language, 89, 290-299.
    Strick, M., Holland, R.W., van Baaren, R. B., & van Knippenberg, A. D. (2009). Finding comfort in a joke: Consolatory effects of humor through cognitive distraction. Emotion, 9(4), 574-578.
    Suls, J. M. (1972). A two-stage model for the appreciation of jokes and cartoons: An information-processing analysis. In J. H. Goldstein & P. E. McGhee (Eds.), The psychology of humor: Theoretical perspectives and empirical issues (pp. 81-100). New York: Academic Press.
    Toyokura, M., Muro, I., Komiya, T., & Obara, M. (2002). Activation of pre- supplementary motor area (SMA) and SMA proper during unimanual and bimanual complex sequences: An analysis using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Jounal of Neuroimaging, 12, 172-178.
    Tugade, M. M. & Fredrickson, B. L. (2004). Resilient individuals use positive emotions to bounce back from negative emotional experiences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 320-333.
    Uchiyama, Y., Toyoda, H., Honda, M., Yoshida, H., Kochiyama, T., Ebe, K., & Sadato, N. (2008). Functional segregation of the inferior frontal gyrus for syntactic processes: A functional magnetic-resonance imaging study. Neuroscience Research, 61(3), 309-318.
    Uekermann, J., Daum, I., & Channon, S. (2007). Toward a cognitive and social neuroscience of humor processing. Social cognition, 24(5), 553-572.
    Vaid, J., Hull, R., Heredia, R., Gerkens, D., & Martinez, F. (2003). Getting a joke: The time course of meaning activation in verbal humor. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 1431-1449.
    Veale, T. (2004). Incongruity in humor: Root cause or epiphenomenon? Humor, 17(4), 419-428.
    Virtue, S., Haberman, J., Clancy, Z., Parrish, T., & Jung Beeman, M. (2006). Neural activity of inferences during story comprehension. Brain Research, 1084(1), 104-114.
    Wapner, W., Hamby, S., & Gardner, H. (1981). The role of the right hemisphere in the apprehension of complex linguistic materials. Brain and Language, 14(1), 15-33.
    Watson, K. K., Jones, T. K., Allman, J. M. (2006). Dendritic architecture of the von Economo neurons. Neuroscience, 141, 1107-1112.
    Watson, K. K., Matthews, B. J., & Allman, J. M. (2007). Brain activation during sight gags and language-dependent humor. Cerebral Cortex, 17(2), 314-324.
    Wild, B., Rodden, F. A., Rapp, A., Erb, M., Grodd, W., & Ruch, W. (2006). Humor and smiling: Cortical regions selective for cognitive, affective, volitional components. Neurology, 66(6), 887-893.
    Wild, B., Rodden, F.A., Grodd, W., & Ruch, W. (2003). Neural correlates of laughter and humour. Brain, 126(10), 2121-2138.
    Wing. L. (1996). The Autistic Spectrum: A Guide for Parents and Professionals. London: Constable.
    Wyer, Jr. R. S., & Collins, II. J. E. (1992). A theory of humor elicitation. Psychological Review, 99, 663-688.
    Zand, J., Spreen, A. N., & LaValle, J. B. (1999). Smart medicine for healthier living. Garden City Park, NY: Avery Publishing.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE