簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 蔡承勳
Tsai, Cheng-Hsun
論文名稱: 以逆向工程為背景之STEM專題課程設計
Special topic in STEM design with reverse engineering as the background
指導教授: 簡佑宏
Chein, Yu-Hung
口試委員: 梁桂嘉
Liang, Kuei-Chia
詹孝中
Chan, Shaio-Chung
簡佑宏
Chein, Yu-Hung
口試日期: 2023/06/15
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 科技應用與人力資源發展學系
Department of Technology Application and Human Resource Development
論文出版年: 2023
畢業學年度: 111
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 80
中文關鍵詞: 工程設計逆向工程學習風格創造力STEM
英文關鍵詞: STEM
研究方法: 實驗設計法
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202300703
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:85下載:20
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 根據108年所上路之十二年國民基本教育課程綱要中的科技領域,學生在綜合型普通高中階段,需以STEM專題式的課程學習工程設計的相關能力,而如今大部分的課程是以傳統正向工程為背景的方式進行,許多研究也以此為基礎進行教學上的改良。正向工程中,學生透過資料的蒐集來建立其設計產品的背景知識,資料正確性的判讀與能否有效的運用知識是學生所要面臨的問題。因此,本研究希望導入逆向工程的概念,讓學生能夠透過實際產品的分析與拆解,能夠更直接的了解產品內部的運作原理與零件結合方式,並探討是否使用逆向工程教學工程設計流程會使學生在學習成效與作品的創意表現上能有所差異,同時本研究也希望探究何種學習風格類型的學生,較為適合以逆向工程之模式學習工程設計。
    本研究以台北市某高中2年級之兩班為研究對象實施教學實驗,教學實驗之工程設計目標為「無用盒」製作,將兩班級分為正向工程組(對照組)與逆向工程組(實驗組),對照組人數為28人,實驗組人數為24人,實施時長為7週14節課,共700分鐘,並在教學實驗前後發放工程設計知識問卷前後測與學習風格問卷,且針對期末成品進行創意矩陣分析,研究結果發現:(1)實驗組在工程設計知識的表現優於對照組。(2)創意表現上,作品原創程度對照組的表現優於實驗組;作品邏輯性與品質實驗組表現優於對照組。(3)學習風格中,訊息處理面向屬於主動型、感知面向屬於感受型與理解面向屬於循序型的學生,在逆向工程中的表現會更好。(4)在學習單中所展現之工程設計流程學習表現,實驗組的表現優於對照組。根據上述結果,逆向工程對於學生學習工程設計是有幫助的,希冀未來科技領域之工程設計課程,能汲取逆向工程中獲取知識全面的優點,與原正向工程課程相結合,發展出新的教學框架。

    摘 要 i 目 錄 iii 表 次 v 圖 次 vii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 3 第二節 研究目的與待答問題 5 第三節 重要名詞解釋 6 第四節 研究流程 7 第五節 研究限制 9 第二章 文獻探討 11 第一節 STEM 11 第二節 工程設計 13 第三節 逆向工程與D/A/A 15 第四節 學習風格 17 第五節 創造力 19 第三章 實驗設計與實施 21 第一節 實驗設計 22 第二節 實驗對象 24 第三節 實驗架構 25 第四節 實驗流程 26 第五節 研究分析工具 32 第六節 資料處理與分析 35 第四章 結果與討論 37 第一節 學生於工程設計知識前後測之差異比較 37 第二節 學生創意表現之差異比較 40 第三節 不同學習風格逆向工程組學生於課程中的表現差異 43 第四節 學生學習歷程表現差異 44 第五節 綜合討論 46 第五章 結論與建議 53 第一節 研究結論 53 第二節 建議 56 參考文獻 58 一、中文部分 58 二、英文部分 58 附 錄 65 附錄1 正向工程設計學習單 66 附錄2 逆向工程設計學習單 68 附錄3 學生作品 70 附錄4 工程知識問卷 73 附錄5 學習風格量表問卷 76

    林坤誼(2014)。STEM科際整合教育培養整合理論與實務的科技人才。科技與人力教育季刊,1(1),1。
    姚經政、林呈彥(2016)。STEM教育應用於機器人教學—以6E教學模式結合差異化教學.。科技與人力教育季刊,3(1),53-75。
    范斯淳、游光昭(2016)。科技教育融入STEM課程的核心價值與實踐。教育科學研究期刊,61(2),153-183。
    教育部(2018)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要科技領域。
    游光昭、林坤誼、王詩婷(2007)。自然與生活科技領域統整課程的反思與實踐。當代教育研究季刊,15(1),143-180。
    Ali, M. R. (2005). Why teach reverse engineering? ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 30(4), 1–4.https://doi.org/10.1145/1082983.1083004
    Beitz, W., Pahl, G., & Grote, K. (1996). Engineering design: a systematic  approach. Mrs Bulletin, 71.https://doi.org/10.1557/S0883769400035776
    Besemer, S. P., & O'Quin, K. (1999). Confirming the three-factor creative product analysis matrix model in an American sample. Creativity Research Journal, 12(4), 287-296.https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1204_6
    Bødker, S., & Kyng, M. (2018). Participatory design that matters—Facing the big issues. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human  Interaction, 25(1), 1-31.
    Brockman, J. B. (2009). Introduction to engineering: Modeling and problem solving. Wiley.
    Bybee, R. W. (2010). What is STEM education?. Science, 329(5995), 996- 996. DOI: 10.1126/science.1194998
    Cropley, D. H. (2016). Creativity in engineering. Springer Singapore.
    Cropley, D. H., & Cropley, A. J. (2013). Creativity and crime: A psychological approach. Cambridge University Press.
    Dixon, R. A., & Brown, R. A. (2012). Transfer of Learning: Connecting Concepts during Problem Solving. Journal of Technology Education, 24(1), 2-17.
    Dieter, G. E., & Schmidt, L. C. (2009). Engineering design (pp. 18-20). McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
    Endsley, M. R., Bolte, B., & Jones, D. G. (2003). Designing for situation   awareness: An approach to user-centered design. CRC press.
    Felder, R.M.,& Silverman, L.K.(1988). Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education. Journal of Engineering Education, 78(7), 674-681.
    Felder, R. M., & Spurlin, J. (1991). Index of learning styles. International Journal of Engineering Education, 5(1), 1.
    Giacomin, J. (2014). What is human centred design?. The Design Journal, 17(4), 606-623.https://doi.org/10.2752/175630614X14056185480186
    Gregory, J. (2003). Scandinavian approaches to participatory design. International Journal of Engineering Education, 19(1), 62-74.
    Householder, D. L., & Hailey, C. E. (2012). Incorporating engineering design challenges into STEM courses. National Center for Engineering and Technology Education
    Holtzblatt, K., & Beyer, H. (1997). Contextual design: defining customer-centered systems. Elsevier.
    International Technology Education Association. (2000). Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology. Technology Teacher, 59(5), 8-13.
    Jensen, R. (1999) .The Dream Society: How the Coming Shift from Information to Imagination will Transform your Business. McGraw-Hill.
    Kawenski, M. (1991). Encouraging creativity in design. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 25(3), 263–266.
    Kelley, T. R. (2008). Cognitive Processes of Students Participating in Engineering-Focused Design Instruction. Journal of Technology Education, 19(2), 50-64.
    Kelly, K. (2010). What technology wants. https://doi.org/10.5840/traddisc2010/201137341
    Kelly, J. C. (2008). Interactive genetic algorithms for shape preference assessment in engineering design. University of Michigan.
    Kensing, F., & Blomberg, J. (1998). Participatory design: Issues and concerns. Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW), 7(3), 167-185.
    Kolb, A.Y. & Kolb, D.A.(2005). The Kolb learning style inventory.
    Kramer-Koehler, P., Tooney, N. M., & Beke, D. P. (1995, November). The use of learning style innovations to improve retention. In Proceedings Frontiers in Education 1995 25th Annual Conference. Engineering Education for the 21st Century , NY, America.
    Krippendorff, K. (2004). Intrinsic motivation and human-centred design. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 5(1), 43-72.https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922031000086717
    Ladachart, L., Cholsin, J., Kwanpet, S., Teerapanpong, R., Dessi, A., Phuangsuwan, L., & Phothong, W. (2021). Ninth-grade students’ perceptions on the design-thinking mindset in the context of reverse engineering. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 1-21.
    Maguire, M. (2001). Methods to support human-centred design. International journal of human-computer studies, 55(4), 587-634. https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.2001.0503
    Magulod Jr, G. C. (2019). Learning styles, study habits and academic performance of Filipino University students in applied science courses: Implications for instruction. JOTSE: Journal of Technology and Science Education, 9(2), 184-198.
    McGowan, V. C., Ventura, M., & Bell, P. (2017). Reverse Engineering. Science and Children, 54(8), 68.
    Mokyr, J. (1990). The lever of riches: Technological creativity and economic progress. Oxford University Press.https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1991.11505212
    Orta, P., Medoza, R. R., Elizalde, H., & Guerra, D. (2006, June).
    Engineering education through reverse engineering. 2006 Annual Conference & Exposition, 11-554
    Plucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. T. (2004). Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3902_1
    Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. The Phi Delta Kappan,  42(7), 305–310.
    Sanders, E. B. N. (2002). From user-centered to participatory design approaches. In Design and the social sciences (pp. 18-25). CRC Press.
    Sanoff, H. (2007). Special issue on participatory design. Design Studies, 3(28), 213-215. DOI:10.1016/j.destud.2007.02.001.
    Semadeni, M., Anderson, B.S.(2010). The follower's dilemma: innovation and imitation in the professional services industry. Acad.Manag. J. 53(5), 1175–1193. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.54533232
    Sheppard, S. D. (1992). Mechanical dissection: An experience in how things work. In Proceedings of the Engineering Education:  Curriculum Innovation & Integration. Retrieved April 3, 2021.https://doi.org/10.1145/3152421
    Soloman, B. A., & Felder, R. M. (2005). Index of learning styles questionnaire. NC State University. Available online at: http://www.   engr. ncsu. edu/learningstyles/ilsweb. html (last visited on 14.05.  2010), 70.
    Spinuzzi, C. (2005). The methodology of participatory design. Technical communication, 52(2), 163-174.
    Sprecher, T. B. (1959). A study of engineers’ criteria for creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 43(2), 141–148.
    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047763
    Toulmin, C. N., & Groome, M. (2007). Building a science, technology, engineering, and math agenda. National Governors Association.
    Van Zwanenberg, N., Wilkinson, L. J., & Anderson, A. (2000). Felder and Silverman's Index of Learning Styles and Honey and Mumford's Learning Styles Questionnaire: how do they compare and do they predict academic performance?. Educational Psychology, 20(3), 365-380. https://doi.org/10.1080/713663743
    Wood, K. L., Jensen, D., Bezdek, J., & Otto, K. N. (2001). Reverse
    engineering and redesign: Courses to incrementally and systematically teach design. Journal of Engineering Education, 90(3), 363-374. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2001.tb00615.
    Younis, MB, & Tutunji, T. (2012). Reverse engineering course at Philadelphia University. European Journal of Engineering Education, 37(1), 83–95.https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2012.658508
    Zhang, G., & Zhou, J. (2016). The effects of forward and reverse engineering on firm innovation performance in the stages of technology catch-up: An empirical study of China. Technological forecasting and social change, 104, 212-222.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.01.010
    Zhong, B., Kang, S., & Zhan, Z. (2021). Investigating the effect of reverse engineering pedagogy in K‐12 robotics education. Computer   Applications in Engineering Education, 29(5), 1097-1111.https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22363
    Zywno, M. (2003). A contribution to validation of score meaning for Felder Soloman's Index of Learning Styles. 2003 Annual Conference, 8-31. DOI:10.18260/1-2—12424.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE