論文摘要
論文名稱：情感特質、情緒狀態及解題時期對創造力表現之影響
學校所別： 國立台灣師範大學工業教育研究所
摘 要 別： 九十五學年度第二學期碩士論文摘要
研 究 生： 黃瑜
指導教授： 陳學志博士、鄭慶民 教授

摘要內容：
本研究旨在探討高職學生之情緒正、負向度在不同解題時期的創造力表現是否有所差異，以及探討情感特質與情緒狀態交互作用下，在不同解題時期對高職學生創造力表現之影響。
本研究以宜蘭縣某公立高商夜校學校二年級六個班級的學生為研究對象，共有兩個實驗，採用準實驗研究法之不等組前後測設計。實驗一將高職學生依班級為單位隨機分派為兩組，實驗組一為正向情緒操弄組，施以正向之情緒導引；實驗組二為負向情緒操弄組，施以負向之情緒導引。實驗二將高職學生依班級為單位隨機分派為四組，負向情感特質/負向情緒狀態組、負向情感特質/正向情緒狀態組、正向情感特質/負向情緒狀態組及正向情感特質/正向情緒狀態組。
本研究工具包括有：「情緒特質量表」、「身心狀態調查表」、「想像回憶材料」及「創造思考測驗」。所得之資料分別採描述統計、t考驗、單變量變異數分析等統計方法加以分析。
本研究主要發現如下：
一、在本研究結果推論可得，負向情感特質者比正向情感特質者創造力表現較佳。
二、在本研究結果推論可得，負向情感特質者經正向情緒操弄，所得效益大，其創造力表現較佳。
　　最後，根據本研究主要發現提出若干意見，以供相關單位人員在教育及學術研究上做為參考。

The Relationships between Emotional Traits , Emotion ,Time and Creativity
YU HUANG
Abstract
The main purposes of this study were (a) to investigate the differences of students’ performances on creativity in different induced moods; and (b)to explore the relationships between Emotional Traits、Emotional States , Time and the students’ performances on creativity.
An unequal group pretest-posttest design was employed in these studys . Study1 The participants consisted of 6 classes of students, randomly distributed into 2 groups: the experimental group A (n = 16) which received positive mood induction and the experimental group B (n = 16) which received negative mood induction。Study2 The participants consisted of 4 classes of students, randomly distributed into 4 groups: the experimental group A (n = 15 ) which negative emotional Traits /negative mood induction、the experimental group B (n = 14) which negative emotional Traits / positive mood induction、the experimental group C (n = 15) which positive emotional Traits / negative mood induction、and the experimental group C (n = 12) which positive emotional Traits / positive mood induction。
The employed instruments were The Questionnaire of Emotional Traits, The Questionnaire of Emotional States, 「induced emotional matter」and The Test of Creativity .The applied analysis methods were Descriptives , single Analysis of Variance.
The findings and conclusions of this study were as follows:
1. Negative emotional traits were a better facilitator for the students’ performance on creativity than positive emotional traits.
2. Positive emotional traits induced positive moods were able to promote students’ performance on the invention of creativity.
Finally, some suggestions were proposed for teachers, relative educational institutions, parents and further study.

參考文獻
中文文獻
林幸台、王木榮（1998）。威廉斯創造力測驗。台北：心理出版社。
林孟宗（1987）。戈爾登的資優創造教學模式。資優學生創造力與特殊才能。中 華民國
特殊教育學會編，台北：心理。
王強之（1998）。心情一致性主觀機率判斷的理論模式驗證。輔仁大學應用心理學研究
所碩士論文。
王淑俐（2003）。情緒管理。台北市：全華。
林和逸（1998）。情緒狀態的學察與引發來源類別對情緒調適的影響。輔仁大學應用心
理學研究所碩士論文。
邱發忠 (2005)，創造力認知機制運作之探究。國立臺灣師範大學教續心理與輔導學系博
士論文。
陳美岑（2000）。高職實用技能班美髮技術科創造思考教學方案之實施成效。國立台灣
師範大學家政教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
陳淑惠（1996）。中小學生創造力發展及其相關因素之研究。國立政治大學教育學系碩
士論文，未出版，台北。
陳龍安（1998）。創造思考教學的理論與實際。台北：心理出版社。
陳龍安（2000）。創意思考教學。台北:師大書苑有限公司。
葉玉珠（2000）。創造力發展的生態系統模式及其應用於科技與資訊領域之內涵分析。
教育心理學報，32（1），95-121。
葉玉珠（2002）。國小中高年級學童科技創造力發展與其主要影響生態系統之動態關係。
國科會九十年度計畫NSC90-2511-S-110-006。
張玉成（1993）。思考技巧與教學。台北，心理。
張春興（1989）。心理學。台北：東華。
張珮甄（2002）。國小五年級學童性別、出生序、家庭結構、情緒、創意個人特質與其
科技創造力之關係。國立中山大學教育研究所研士論文。
劉鶴龍（1996）。資訊電子產業科技人員與非科技人員創造力之研究。國立政治大學科
技管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。
鄭昭明（1993）。認知心理學：理論與實踐。台北：桂冠。

英文文獻
Amabile, T. M. (1983). The Social Psychology of Creativity. NY.: Pringer-Verlag.
Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations.Research in
Organizational Behavior, 10, 123-67.
Amibile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
Ashby, F. G., Isen, A. M., and Turken, U. (1999). A Neuropsychological Theory of Positive
Affect and Its Influence on Cognition. Psychological Review, 106(3),529-550.
Brenner, E. (2000). Mood Induction in Children: Methodological Issues and Clinical
Implications. Review of General Psychology, 4(3), 264-283.
Cropley, A. J. (2000). Defining and measuring creativity: Are creativity tests worth using?
Roeper Review, 23(2), 72-80.
Davis, G.A. (1986). Creativity is forever (2nd ed.). Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall/Hunt.
Ekman, P. (1999). Basic emotions. In T. Dalgleish, ＆ M. Power (Ed.). Handbook of
Cognition and Emotion, Chap. 3.
Estrada, C., Isen, A. M., & Young, M. (1997). Positive Affect Facilitates Integration of　　
Information and Decreases Anchoring in Reasoning among Physicians.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 72(1), 117-136.
Eysenck, H. J. (1999). Creativity and personality. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.). Handbook
　　of creativity. NY. : Cambridge University Press.
Gardner, H. (1988). Creative lives and creative works: A synthetic scientific approach.　　In
R. J. Sternberg (Ed.),The Nature of creativity (p.298-324). New York:Cambridge University Press.
George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2001). When openness to experience and conscientiousness are
related to creative behavior: An interactional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 513-524.
Greene, T. R., & Noice, H. (1988). Influence of positive affect upon creative thinking and
problem solving in children. Psychological Reports, 63, 895-898.
Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444-454.
Hocevar, D. (1981), Measurement of creativity: Review and critique. Journal of Personality
Assessment,45, 450-464.
Isen A. M., & Daubman, K. A. (1984). The influence of affect on categorization.Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1206-1217.
Isen, A. M. (1999). Positive Affect. In T. Dalgleish, ＆ M. Power (Ed.). Handbook of
Cognition and Emotion, Chap. 25, 522-539.
Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., & Nowicki, G. P. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative
Problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52,1122-1131.
Isen, A. M., Johnson, M. M., Mertz, E., & Robinson, G. F. (1985). The influence of positive
affect on the unusualness of word associations. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 48(6), 1413-1426.
Isen, A. M., Johnson, M. S., Mertz, E., & Robinson, G. F. (1985). The influence of positive
affect on the unusualness of word associations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1413-1426.
Izard, C. E. (1992). Basic emotions, relations among emotions, and emotion-cognition relations. Psychological Review, 99(3), 561-565.
Kaufmann, G , & Vosburg S.K.（2002）.The effects of early and late idea production.Creativity Research Journal,14（3）,317-330.
Kaugars, A. S., & Russ, S. W. (2000). Emotion in Children’s Play and Creative Problem
Solving. Creativity Research Journal, 13(2), 211-219.
Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Cognition and motivation in emotion. American Psychologist,46(4),
352-367.
Lazarus, R., & Folkman, S. (1975). A cognitively oriented psychologist look at feedback.
American Psychologist, 30, 553-561.
Leff, H. L. (2001). Affect, creative experience, and psychological adjustment.American
Journal of Art Therapy, 39(3), 98-99.
Lorr, M. (1989). Models and methods for measurement of moods. In R. Plutchik, ＆ H.
Kellerman. (Ed.). Emotion, theory, research, and experience, v. 4: The measurement of emotions. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Chap. 2, p.37-53.Lubart, T. I. (1999). Creativity cross cultures. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.). Handbook of creativity. NY. : Cambridge University Press.
Lubart, T. I., & Getz, I. (1997). Emotion, metaphor, and the creative process.Creativity
research journal,10(4), 285-301.
Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69,
220-232.
Mumford, M. D. & Gustafson, S. B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: Integration,application, and
innovation.( Psychological Bulletin, 103, 27—43.)
Murray, N., Sujan, H., Hirt, E. R., & Sujan, M. (1999). The Influence of Mood on Categorization: A Cognitive Flexibility Interpretation. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 59(3), 411-425.
O’Quin, K., & Derks, P. (1994). Humor and creativity: A review of the empirical literature. In
M. P.Shaw, & M. R. Runco. (Ed.). Creativity and Affect.P.227-256.
Parrott, W. G., & Hertel, P. (1999). Research Methods in Cognition and Emotion. In .Dalgleish
and M. Power (Ed.). Handbook of Cognition and Emotion. Chichester,Egland: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Plutchik, R. (1994). The psychology and biology of emotion. NY.: HarperCollins College
Publishers.
Richard, R. (1994). Creativity and bipolar mood swings. In M. P. Shaw, ＆ M. R.Runco. (Ed.). Creativity and Affect. P.44-73.
Richard, R., & Kinney, D. K. (1997). Mood swings and creativity. In M. A. Runco ＆ R.
Runco (ed.). Eminent creativity, everyday creativity, and Health Greenwich,CT: Ablex.Robinson, J. P., Shaver, P.
Russ, S. W. (1996). Development of Creative Processes in Children. New Directions for Child
Development, 72, 31-42.
Russell, J. A., & Carroll, J. M. (1999). On the Bipolarity of Positive and Negative Affect.
Psychological Bulletin, 125(1), 3-30.
Sternberg, R. J. (1988). A three-fact model of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of
creativity. Cambrige : Cambrige University Press.
Sternberg, R. J. (2000). Identifying and development creative giftedness. Roeper review, 23(2),
60-64.
Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.). (1999). Handbook of creativity. NY : Cambridge University 118 Press.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1996). Investing creativity.Tan, J. L. (n.d.).An example of a
computer controlled experimental environment: The effects of moods on the performance of a boring task. Nov. 9, 2001, Retrieved　from　　　http://www.employees.csbsju.edu/jmakepeace/Perspectives2k/f12tan.JMM.html Torrance, E. P. (1972). Can we teach children to think creativity? Journal of Creative Behavior, 6, 114-143.
Torrance, E. P. (1988). The Natural of Creativity as manifest in its texting. In R. J.Sterberg
(Ed.). The Nature of Creativity. (p.125-147). NY.：Cambridge University Press.
Velten, E. (1968). A laboratory task for induction of mood states. Behavior Research and
Therapy, 6, 473-482.
Watson, D. (1988). Intraindividual and Interindividual Analyses of Positive and Negative 　　　　
Affect: Their Relation to Health Complaints, Perceived Stress, and Daily Activities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6),1020-1030.
Young, C. A. (1996). Emotions and emotional intelligence. November, 29, 2001,Retrieved from http://trochim.human.cornell.edu/gallery/young/emotion.htm#emotion