本研究旨在探討主動探究的教學模式中國中學生資訊素養方面的表現與參與情況。期藉此研究發現，瞭解對目前我國國中學生實施主動探究的教學活動的可行性，並提供各個國民中學教育工作者在實施主動探究的教學活動或資訊素養的相關教學活動時之參考。
本研究係先由理論及文獻之探討，剖析「主動探究的教學模式」與「國中學生的資訊素養」之內涵；其次以研究者目前任教國中的三個國二班級學生（共計101人）為研究對象，並以自行設計之主動探究教學活動和國中學生資訊素養之表現調查問卷為工具，實施實驗教學與問卷調查。
研究結果發現：
一、 在主動探究的教學模式中，大部分學生會主動搜尋所需要的資料。
二、 在主動探究的教學活動中，學生參與各種資訊素養方面的工作的情形，整體而言相當不錯。
三、 對大部分的國中學生而言，已有足夠的資訊素養能力，以應付主動探究教學活動的需求，並且透過實作練習，還可以讓資訊素養能力有效提昇。
四、 大部分的學生對於主動探究的教學活動在提昇資訊素養能力方面的評價相當高。
最後，根據研究心得，針對「主動探究的教學活動」提出一些建議。

The goal of the study is to explore the relationship between teaching model for self-initiated exploration and the performance as well as the participation of the students in the work of information literacy. Through the findings of this study, the researcher hopes to find out if the implementation of teaching activities for self-initiated exploration on the current crop of middle school students is feasible or not. Moreover, the study provides reference points to various middle school educators who are implementing teaching activities for self-initiated exploration or related teaching activities for information literacy.
Through a review of related theories and literature, the study first analyzes the connotations of “teaching model for self-initiated exploration” and “information literacy of middle-school students.” Secondly, with the three classes of students (approximately 101 students) belonging to the second level of the middle school the researcher is currently teaching in as respondents, the study makes use of a self-designed questionnaire on “teaching model for self-initiated exploration” and “information literacy abilities of middle-school students” to conduct a survey and experimental teaching sessions.
Results of the Study:
I. In the teaching model for self-initiated exploration, majority of the students will look for the materials they need on their own initiative.
II. In the teaching activities for self-initiated exploration, the way the students participate in various information-gathering work is positive.
III. Most of the middle-school students feel that they have adequate information literacy capabilities to cope with the needs of teaching activities designed for self-initiated exploration. Through actual practice, they are also able to improve their information literacy abilities.
IV. Majority of the students gave high marks to the teaching activities for self-initiated exploration as a means of improving their information literacy abilities.
Lastly, based on the conclusions of the study, recommendations are made regarding the teaching activities for self-initiated exploration.

一、 中文部分
1. 王貴珠（民89）。中央警察大學圖書館使用者資訊素養問題研究。私立輔仁大學圖書資訊學系碩士班碩士論文。
2. 何志中（民88）。台灣中部地區國民小學教師網路素養之研究。國立台中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
3. 吳美美（民85）。資訊時代人人需要資訊素養。社教雙月刊，73期，p4~5。
4. 李德竹（民86）。由資訊素養研究圖書館資訊服務之意義與內涵。台北市：國科會專題研究計劃，NSC86-2413-H002-031。
5. 林美和（民85）。資訊素養與終身學習的關係。社教雙月刊，73期，p7~12。
6. 林蕙蓉（民83）。國小學童圖書資訊利用之教學在國語科學習成效之研究。台南師院學報，23期，p135~167。
7. 倪達仁（民76）。國民中學教師電腦素養之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
8. 張一蕃（民86）。資訊時代之國民素養與教育。載於中央研究院資訊科學研究所主編：資訊科技對人文、社會的衝擊與影響期末研究報告。http:/www.stic.gov.tw/stic/l/home_test/scitech/chapter-4.hym。
9. 陳文典（民90）。「自然生活科技學習領域」生活化課程設計。台北：康軒 文教事業。
10. 陳仲彥（民85）。資訊素養與圖書館利用教育。社教雙月刊，73期，p19~22。
11. 郭鍠莉（民85）。專訪李隆盛教授談資訊素養教育。社教雙月刊，73期，p23~24。
12. 曾淑賢（民85）。台灣地區推展兒童圖書館利用教育之近況。書苑，29期，p49~63。
13. 劉淑娟（民87）。我國公共圖書館技術服務館員資訊素養之研究。私立淡江大學教育資料科學學系碩士班碩士論文，未出版。
14. 劉貞孜（民88）。資訊素養課程與一般課合作規劃類型探析。國教新知，第46卷，第1期，p50~61。
15. 賴苑玲（民89）。以資訊素養為基礎之國小圖書館利用教育之探討教學科技與媒體。
16. 龍應台（民88）。百年思索。台北：時報出版。
17. 顏嘉億（民89）。高雄市國民小學行政人員資訊素養能力之研究。國立高雄師範大學工業教育學系研究所碩士論文。
二、英文部分
1. American Library association（1989）. American library association presidential committee on information literacy, final report. Chicago：ALA.
2. Behrens, S. J.（1994）. A conceptual analysis and historical overview of information literacy.
3. Breivik, P. & Gee. G.（1989）. Information literacy: revolution in the library. NY: Macmillan Press.
4. Clark, I. L.（1995）. Information literacy and writing center. Computer and Composition, 12（2）,203-209.
5. Compaine, B. M.（1984）. Information technology and cultural change: Toward a new literacy. In B. M. Compaine（Eds.）. Issues in new information technology. N. J.: Ablex Pub. ,146-178.
6. Curran, C. C.（1990）. Information literacy and the public librarian. Public Libraries, 29, 349-353.
7. Doyle, C. S.（1992）. Outcome Measures for Information Literacy within the National Education Goals of 1990. Final report to National Forum on Information Literacy. （ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED351 033）.
8. Goyen, J. D.（1977）. Incidence of adult illiteracy in Sydney. Canberra: Australian Association of Adult Education.
9. Horton Jr. F. W.（1983）. Information literacy vs. computer literacy. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science, 9（4）,36.
10. Humes, B.（1992）. The national literacy act: what librarian should know. The Bookmark,（50）3,206.
11. McClure, C. R.（1994）. Network literacy: A role for libraries? Information Technology and Libraries, June,115-125.
12. Olsen, J. K.（1993）. The electronic library and literacy. In Farmer, D. W.& Mech, T. F.（Ed.）Information literacy: developing students as independent learners. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Press.
13. Rader, H. B.（1990）. Bringing information literacy into the academic curriculum. College and Research Libraries News, 9, 880.
14. Rader, H. B.（1991）. Information literacy: a revolution in the library. RQ,31（1）,26.