本研究旨在運用電腦模擬式教學來達到技能學習的目的，並分析不同個人特質與能力的學習者，在電腦模擬學習與技能實作表現上的情形，以作為學校或學生在技能訓練與教學運用上的參考。
本研究透過文獻探討歸納有關模擬式教學系統的設計原則、焊接技能的概念與重要操作步驟、以及將會造成學習者在技能模擬學習與實作差異的個人能力或特質，作為「技能模擬學習系統」規劃與實驗設計的重要參考依據。此外，本研究亦以所探討的各項因素評量工具（團體嵌圖測驗、空間能力測驗、威廉斯創造力測驗以及電腦素養問卷），對北市某公立高職冷凍科兩班共79位學生完成其認知型態、空間能力、創造力與電腦素養等影響因素之施測，與為期四週的技能模擬學習。
在經由相關的資料整理與統計徑路分析後，得到如下影響技能模擬學習與技能實作表現的關鍵性因素。
1.學習者的電腦素養會直接影響技能模擬學習成效
2.學習者的認知型態與空間能力會透過電腦素養間接影響技能模擬
學習成效
3.學習者的空間能力及技能模擬學習成效會直接影響技能實作表現
4.學習者的電腦素養會透過技能模擬學習成效間接影響實作表現
5.學習者的認知型態會透過空間能力間接影響實作表現
6.學習者的創造力不會影響技能模擬學習成效與技能實作表現

The purpose of this study was to investigate the factors that could influence the performance of technical skills through the computer simulation constructed by this study. The result of this study can be used as a reference for providing proper skill training in vocational schools.
A literature review was conducted to help the researcher identifying the processes of constructing the computer simulation system. Two classes of 79 industrial vocational high school students, from 16 to 17 years old, were invited to participate this study. Group Embedded Figures Test, Spatial ability test, Williams’ Creativity Assessment Packet test, and computer literacy test were given to those students before they get to learn in the computer simulation programs. The tests scores were used to analyze student’s congenital abilities that influence the performance of skill simulation and hands-on activities.
After the data collection and analysis, the results of this study include:
1.The performance of computer simulation was influenced directly by students’ computer literacy.
2.Students’ cognitive style and spatial ability can indirectly influence their skill performance through computer simulation.
3.Students’ skill performance was directly influenced by their spatial abilities and computer simulation.
4.Skill performance can be influenced indirectly by student’s computer literacy through the computer simulation.
5.Skill performance was influenced by students’ cognitive style through spatial ability.
6.It was found that students’ creativity would not influence their performance in computer simulation and hands-on skill.

一、中文部份
毛連塭、郭有遹、陳龍安、林幸台（2000）。創造力研究。台北：心
　理出版社。
沈中偉（2004）。科技與學習理論與實務。台北：心理出版社。
李大偉（1986)。技術教育測量與評鑑。台北：三民書局。
李咏吟（1998）。認知教學理論與策略。台北：心理出版社。
李居芳（2002）。冷凍空調概論。台北：全華科技圖書股份有限公司。
吳仁和、林信惠（2003）。系統分析與設計理論與實務應用。台北：
　智勝文化。
林合彥（2004）。具有教學支援的網路化模擬學習環境。國立臺灣師範大學資訊教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。
林幸台、王木榮（1994）。威廉斯創造力測驗指導手冊。台北：心理
　出版社。
林明廷（1995）。電腦多媒體在工場安全教育之應用研究。國立臺灣
師範大學工業科技教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。
林明錚（1998）。認知型態對國小學生在資訊擷取能力、空間能力影響之探索研究。國立臺灣師範大學工業科技教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。
林振盈（2002）。高級工業職業學校學生電腦素養之研究。國立臺灣
　師範大學工業科技教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。
康鳳梅、戴文雄、鐘瑞國（2003）。高工學生空間能力指標建構之研
　究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫。
康鳳梅、簡慶郎、詹秉鈞（2003）。工程圖交線電腦化創意教材提升學生空間能力之研究。師大學報，48(2)，225-238。
陳婉如（1998）。認知型態與空間能力對程式設計學習成效之研究。
　國立彰化師範大學工業教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，彰化。
陳龍安（2002）。創造思考教學的理論與實務。台北：心理出版社。
郭生玉（1999）。心理與教育研究法（十六版）。台北：精華書局。
莊謙本（1995）。電子電路電腦輔助教學評量模式探討。教學科技與
　媒體，22，3-9。
連錦杰、蕭明哲（1996）。冷凍空調實習。台北：全華科技圖書股份
有限公司。
張春興（1994）。教育心理學—三化取向的理論與實踐。台北：東華
　書局。
張鑫安（2004）。以題型模組為機組織網路多媒體測驗編輯系統。國立臺灣師範大學工業科技教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。
許瑛玿、廖桂菁（2002）。情境式網路輔助學習環境之研發與實踐，
　科學教育學刊，10(2) ，157-178。
許麗玲（2000）。認知風格在虛擬實境遠距學習遷移之影響。國立高
　雄師範大學工業科技教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，高雄。
戴文雄（1998）。不同正增強回饋型式電腦輔助學習系統對不同認知
　型態與空間能力之高工學生機械製圖學習成效之研究。行政院國
　科會補助專題研究計畫。
魏明堂（1999）。基本冷凍空調實習總複習。台北：松根出版社。
顏晴榮（1997）。電腦模擬教學在工科技術實習應用之探討。技術及
　職業教育，39(6)，55-60。
二、外文部份
Aldrich, C. (2003). Simulations and the Future of Learning : An
　Innovative Approach to e-Learning. San Diego, CA: Pfeiffer and Co
　Published.
Alessi, S. M., & Trollip, S. R. (1985). Computer-based instruction:
　Methods and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Alessi, S.M. (1988). Fidelity in the design of instructional simulations.
　Journal of computer based instruction, 15(2), 40-47.
Brown, J. S., Collin, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated Cognition and the
　Culture of Learning. Education Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
Choi, B., & Gennaro, E. (1987). The effectiveness of using computer
　simulated experiments on junior high students' understanding of the
　volume displacement concept. Journal of Research in Science 　
　Teaching,24(6), 539-552.
DeJong, T., Joolingen, W. R., Swaak, J., & Veermans, K. (1998).
　Self-directed learning in simulation based discovery environments.
　Journal of Computer Assisted Learning , 14(3), 235-246.
Donelson, F. L.(1990). The development, testing, and used of a computer
　interface to evaluate an information processing model describing the
　rate of encoding and mental rotation in high students of high and low
　spatial ability. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service
No: ED-326-396.)
Dunn, R. S., & Dunn, K. J. (1979).Learning styles/teaching styles:
　Should they match? Educational Leadership, 36, 238-244.
Fripp, J. (1993). Learning through simulation: Guides to the design and
　use of simulations in business and education. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligent.
　New York: McGraw-Hill.
Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444-454.
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligent. New York:
　McGraw Hill.
Horton,W.(2000). Designing Web-based Training. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Jackson, M. L. (2004). An effective model for rapid skills acquisition
　through a simulation-based integrated learning environment. Journal of
　Educational Computing Research, 30(1), 1-21.
Jonassen, D. H., Davidson, M., Collins, M., Campbell, J., & Haag, B. B.
　(1995). Constructivism and computer-mediated communication in
　distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 9(2),
　7-27.
Keller, J. M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of
　instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(3),
　2-10.
Michael, K. Y. (2001). The effect of a computer simulation activity
　versus a hand-on activity on product creativity in technology
　education. Journal of Technology Education, 13(1), 31-43.
Neisser, U. (1976). Cognitive Psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
　Prentice-Hall.
Ogletree, E. J. (1996). The comparative status of the creative thinking
　ability of waldorf education students: A survey. (ERIC Document
　Reproduction Service No: ED-400-948.)
Pidd, M. (1992). Computer simulation in management science (3rd ed.).
　New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Pappo, H. A. (1998). Simulations for Skill Training. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
Parush, A., Hamm, H., & Shtub, A. (2002). Learning histories in
　simulation-based teaching: the effect on self-learning and transfer.
　Computers & Education, 39(4), 319-332.
Pilkington, R., & Parker, C. (1996). Interacting with computer-based
　simulation : The role of dialogue. Computers & Education, 27(1), 1-14.
Reigeluth, C.M., & Schwartz, E. (1989). An instructional theory for the
　design of computer-based simulations. Journal of Computer-Based
　Instruction, 16(1), 1-10.
Riding, R. & Rayner, S. G. (1998). Cognitive Styles and Learning
　Strategies. London: David Fulton.
Ronen, M., & Eliahu, M. (2000). Simulation - a bridge between theory and reality: the case of electric circuits. Journal of Computer Assisted
　Learning, 16(1), 14-26.
Runco, R. A., Nemiro, J., & Walberg, H. J. (1998). Personal explicit
　theories of creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 32(1), 1-17.
Siemer, J., & Angelides, M.C. (1998). A comprehensive method for the evaluation of complete intelligent tutoring system. Decision Support System, 22(1), 85-102.
Sternberg, R. J. (1988). The nature of creativity: contemporary
　psychological perspectives. New York: Cambrige University Press.
Stephen, M. A., & Stanley, R. T. (2000). Multimedia for learning:
　Methods and development. Massachusetts: Allyn & Bacon.
Tonks, D., & Armitage, S. (1997). A framework for understanding
　learning from management simulations. Journal of Computer Assisted
　Learning, 13(1), 48-58.
Wavering, M. J. (1986). Performance of students in grades six, nine,
　twelve on five logical, spatial, and formal tasks. Journal Research in
　Science Teaching, 23(4), 321-329.
Witkin, H. A. (1971). The role of cognitive style in academic performance
　and in teacher-student relations. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing
　Service.