人際溝通自我調整訓練課程對增進國小
資優生人際溝通能力之成效研究
摘要
本研究旨在編製一套運用自我調整學習模式來教導人際溝通技巧的訓練課程與人際溝通量表；並由實驗教學結果，探討人際溝通自我調整訓練課程對增進國小資優生人際溝通能力之成效，以及分析學習效果是否會因不同年段（中、高年級）而有差異。
本研究採不等組前後測實驗設計，以立意取樣選取北市西門國小三、四、五、六年級資優生為樣本，並根據前測結果，選取低人際溝通能力者共28名為研究對象，再隨機分派為實驗組與控制組。實驗組接受為期八個單元（每週一單元，每單元240分鐘）的實驗訓練課程，控制組則接受普通班教學，無實驗處理。主要研究工具為「人際溝通量表」，施測結果採二因子共變數分析進行假設考驗。另以單元活動回饋單、成員回饋問卷、與研究者的觀察意見，作為研究結果之補充說明。
根據研究結果，本研究主要發現如下：
1.本訓練課程對國小資優生人際溝通能力之增進效果達顯著水準。
2.本訓練課程對國小資優生人際溝通能力之增進效果，不因年段不同而有顯著差異。
3.實驗組受試對本訓練課程頗為肯定與喜愛，且大都能感受此訓練課程對於自我情緒管理與人際互動方面的助益。
關鍵詞：人際溝通技巧、自我調整學習、人際溝通能力、資優生

The Effect of a Self-Regulated Training Course on Improving Interpersonal Communication Ability of Elementary Gifted Students .
Hsu Hui-Ju
ABSTRACT
The major purposes of this study were to examine the impacts of a self-regulated training course on the interpersonal communication ability of gifted students in an elementary school.The study used the unequal-group experimental design. The sample included 3th to 6th grade gifted students in the Taipei Municipal Si-Men Elementary School. Using the pre-test score of the scale of interpersonal communication, 28 low interpersonal communication ability students were selected, and separated them into experimental and control group. The experimwntal group participated in eight sessions of the training course, one session per week and 240 minutes per session.
The major intrument is a self-designed interpersonal communication scale, and the data were analyzed by two-way ANCOVA. The opinion of the experimental subjects and researcher’s observation and comments by means of a feedback questionare, were the supplementary of study results.
According to the result of this study, the main findings were as follows:
1.There was significant training effect on improving the interpersonal communication ability of the experimental group.
2. There was no significant difference between two different grade groups.
3.The subjects reported that they enjoyed the whole training course, and also reported that they improved in the emotional management ability and interpersonal interaction.
Key words: Interpersonal communication skills. Self-regulation learning. Interpersonal communication ability. Gifted students.

參 考 文 獻
中文部份
毛連塭（民84）：資優教育---課程與教學。台北市：五南圖書公司。
王慧君等（民83）：團體領導者訓練實務。台北市：張老師文化。
朱慧平（民79）：資優生和重要他人之資優知覺與資優生創造力、學業成就及生活適應之研究。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所博士論文（未出版）。
李美枝（民81）：社會心理學。台北市：大洋出版社。
呂勝瑛（民71）：資優兒童心理特質研究。教育心理研究，5，225-250。
何榮桂（民70）：國小資優學生認知能力、學習成就與生活適應之分析。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文（未出版）。
李新鏘（民78）：人際初相識行動基模與人際適應。國立台灣大學心理研究所博士論文（未出版）。
吳武典（民68）：資賦優異兒童的智力與焦慮之評量研究。測驗年刊，26期，60-77。
林玉鳳（民86）：輔導活動單元設計彙編。台北市文湖國民小學。
姜錢珠（民82）：社會技巧訓練對增進國中生社會技巧、社會自尊與人際關係效果之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文（未出版）。
郭為藩（民68）：資賦優異兒童生活適應之評鑑。載於教育部國教司編印：資賦優異兒童教育研究實驗叢書第五輯，14-29。
郭為藩（民85）：自我心理學。台北市：師大書苑。
黃瑞換（民65）：才賦優異兒童自我觀念與情緒穩定性之研究。師大教育研究所集刊，15，381。
郭靜姿（民74）：從幾個觀點談資優學生的自我概念與生活適應。資優教育季刊，16, 6-10。
郭靜姿（民77）：國中資優生與普通生學習環境，學習歷程及學習結果之比較研究。特殊教育研究學刊，4期，171-192。
郭靜姿（民85）：我國資優學生輔導與追蹤之問題與改進芻議。資優教育季刊，60, 1-8。
郭靜姿（民88）：自我調節訓練方案對提升數學學障學生解題能力之成效研究。行政院國科會專題研究報告。
孫庭玉等（民84）：班級團體輔導活動彙編。國立台北師範學院附設實驗國民小學。
張景媛（民81）：自我調整、動機信念、選題策略與作業表現關係的研究暨自我調整訓練課程效果之評估。教育心理學報，25期，1-44。
張德聰等（民85）：諮商技巧訓練手冊 。台北市：天馬文化。
梁靜珊（民86）：情緒教育課程對國小資優生情緒適應行為效果之研究。台北市立師範學院國民教育所碩士論文（未出版）。
曾久珍（民86）：如何在國中音樂教學應用「自我調整學習」理念之探討。國立台灣師範大學音樂研究所碩士論文（未出版）。
曾秀玲譯（民72）：資優兒童的情意教育。國教月刊，30，29-32。
曾端真、增玲岷譯（民85）：人際關係與溝通。台北市：揚智文化。
程炳林（民84）：自我調整學習的模式驗證及其教學效果之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理輔導研究所博士論文（未出版）。
趙海藍（民67）：台北市國小資賦優異兒童自我概念與焦慮之研究。教育與心理研究，2，311-343。
劉錦志（民70）：國小資優兒童學習成就與心理特質之關係。測驗年刊，28期，47-54。
盧雪梅（民77）：資賦優異學生社會與情緒發展的輔導。資優教育季刊，28，1-5。
盧蓓恩譯（民85）：人際溝通---目標本位取向。台北市：五南圖書公司。
盧美貴（民73）：資優教育課程的檢討與改進方案。資優教育季刊，13，16-19。
魏麗敏（民85）：影響國小兒童數學成就之自我調節學習與情感因素分析及其策略訓練效果之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理輔導研究所博士論文（未出版）。
韓梅玉（民85）：資優生智力、學科成就、自我概念及同儕關係之研究。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文（未出版）。
蔣明珊（民85）：台北市國小資優資源班課程實施狀況之調查分析。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所博士論文（未出版）。
蕭芳玲（民82）：資優生學校適應與人際關係問題之初探。資優教育季刊，47，4-6。
鍾聖校（民82）：資優兒童的情意教育-從嫉妒情節的超越談起。資優教育季刊，49期，7-11。
簡茂發、蔡玉瑟、張鎮城（民81）：國小資優兒童父母教養方式與生活適應、學習行為、成就動機之相關研究。特殊教育研究學刊，8，225-247。
張靖卿（民85）：資優兒童同儕關係之探究。資優教育期刊，59，25-30。
曾淑蓉摘譯（民73）：資優學生與非資優學生困擾問題的比較。資優教育季刊，12，27-29。
英文部份
Atkinson, J. W., & Raynor J. O. (1978). Personality, motivation, and achievement. Washington, DC:Hemesphere.
Bandura, A., & Jourden, F. J. (1991). Self-regulatory mechanisms governing the impact of social comparison on complax decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 941-951.
Bandura, A., & Cervove, D. (1986). Deferential engagement of self reactive influences in cognitive motivation. Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 38, 92-113.
Cicchetti, G. (1990). Cognitive modeling and reciprocal teaching of reading study strategies. ERIC, ED322969.
Corno, L. (1989).Self-regulated learning : Avolitional analysis. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice(pp.83-110).NY: Springer-Verlag.
Desile, J. R. (1983). Counseling the gifted: What we know, and how it can help. Gifted Education International, 2(1), 19-21.
Farrel, D. M. (1989). Suicide among gifted students. Roeper Review, 3(11), 134-138.
Gallagher, J. J., Greenman, M., Kames, M., & King, A.(1960). Individual classroom adjustments for gifted children in elementary schools. Exceptional Children, 26, 409-422.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frame of mind: The theory of multiple intelligence. New York: Basic Books.
Hollingworth, L. S.(1942). Children above 180 IQ Stanford-Binet：origin and development. Yomkers-on-Hudson, New-York: World Book.
Hansen, J., & Pearson, P. D. (1983). An instrucational study: Improving the inferential comprehension of good and poor forth-grade readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75,821-829.
Hargie, O. (1997). The handbook of communication skills(2nd). London: Routlege.
Jacobs, J. C. (1972). Teacher attitude toward gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 16(1), 23-26.
Jenkins-Friedman, R. & Murphy, D. L. (1988). The Marry Poppins effect: Relationships between gifted students` self-concept and adjustment. Roeper Review, 11(1), 26-30.
Kellermann, K. (1992). Communication: Inherently strategic and primarily automatics. Communication Monographs, 59, 288-300.
Kuhl, J. (1985). Volitional mediators of cognition-behavior consistency: Self-regulatory process and action versus state orientation. In J. Kuhl, & J. Beckman(Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior. West Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Lufting, R. L., & Nichols, M. L. (1990). Assessing the social status of gifted students by age peers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 34(3), 111-115.
MacGregor, S. K. (1984). The effects of questioning-strategy training dilivered by a computerized-text system on the comprehension, vocabulary, and metacognition of third grade students. Dissertation Abstracts International, 46, 01A, P.63.
MacComb, B. L. (1989). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: A phenomenological view. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice(pp.170-220).NY: Springer-Verlag.
Mayer, R. E. (1987). Educational Psychology: A cognitive approach. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
Paris, S. G., & Byrnes, J. P. (1989). The constructive approach to self-regulation and learning in the classroom. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice(pp.170-200).NY: Springer-Verlag.
Piechowski, M. M.(1991). Emotional development and emotional giftedness.In Colangelo & Davis(Eds.), Handbook of gifted education(pp.285-306). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Shunk, D. H. (1994) Self-regulation of self-efficacy and attribution in academic settings. In D. H., Shunk, & B.J., Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance (pp.75-100). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Silverman L.K. (1993).Counseling the gifted and talented. New York: Love Publishing Company.
Silverman L.K. (1994). Affective curriculum for the gifted. In J. VanTassal-Baska (Eds.). Comprehensive curriculum for gifted learners(pp.325-360). Massa Chusetts:Allyn & Bacon.
Sternberg, R.(1996). Successful intelligence: How practical and creative intelligence determine success in life. London: Jeff Herman.
Terman, L. M. (1925). Genetic studies of genius: Vol. 1 Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Terman, L. M., & Oden, M. H. (1947). Genetic studies of genius: Vol. 4. The gifted child grows up. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Terman, L. M., & Oden, M. H. (1959). Genetic studies of genius: Vol. 5. The gifted child grows up. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Torrance, E. P. (1968). Mental health and contructive behavior. Belmont, C. A.: Wadworth.
Van Hout Wolters, B. H. A. M. (1990). Training self-regulation in several educational fields. In J. M. Pieters, K. Brever, & P. R. J. Simons(Eds.), Learning environments: Contributions from Dutch and German Research(pp.299-303). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Vermunt, D. H. M. (1989). The interplay between internal and external regulation of learning, and design of process-oriented instruction. Paper Presented at the conference of the European Association of Research on Learning and Instruction, Madrid, Spain.
W. Hargie O.D.(1997). The handbook of communication skills (2nd ed.). London, & New York : Routledge.
Whitmore, J. (1980). Giftedness, conflict, and underachievement. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Winne, P. H. (1995). Inherent details in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology, 30, 173-187.
Yesseldyke, J. E. & Davison, J. E. (1986). Special education: a practical approach for teacher. (3rd ED.). Boston: Houghton. P.215.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1989a). Models of self-regulated learning and academic achievement. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Shunk(Eds.), Self-regulation and academic achievement: Theory, research and practice. New York: SpringerVerlag.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Shunk, D. H. (Eds.). (1989). Self-regulation and academic achievement: Theory, research and practice. New York: SpringerVerlag.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1989b). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 329-339.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning :Relating grade, sex, and gifted to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 51-59.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1994). Dimensions of academic self-regulation: A conceptual framework for education. In D. H., Shunk, & B.J., Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance (pp.3-24). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1995). Self-regulation involves more than metacognition: A social cognitive perspective. Educational Psychologist, 30, 217-221.