簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 詹瑜蕙
Chan Yu-Hui
論文名稱: 師徒制與員工生涯發展之研究-----以壽險業為例
A Study of the Relationship between Mentoring and Employee's Career Development----Using Insurance company as an Example
指導教授: 余鑑
Yu, Chien
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 科技應用與人力資源發展學系
Department of Technology Application and Human Resource Development
論文出版年: 2000
畢業學年度: 88
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 125
中文關鍵詞: 師徒制員工生涯發展壽險業
英文關鍵詞: mentoring, career development
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:453下載:68
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本論文主要在探索企業組織師徒制與員工生涯發展之關係,運用個案研究,訪談兩家保險公司之業務單位,如何施行師徒制,及施行師徒制後,對員工生涯發展有何影響。訪談兩家保險公司各四人,其中三人擔任師傅的角色,其餘五人擔任徒弟的角色。
    訪談所得資料係根據Kram所提出之兩大師徒制功能-事業生涯事業與心理社會功能,作分析與研究,而得以下之結論:
    1.師徒制的方式除了為業務員,晉升時的條件之外,藉由師徒制的方式,使得新進業務人員可以學習主管的成功經驗與工作態度,使得公司之工作文化順利傳承下去,推銷與維持公司的產品與形象,並保持良好的活動習慣。
    2. 師徒學習方式主要的有上課、實際操作、陪同等。接觸方式主要運用固定時間開會、聊天,討論、同事協助、聚會、機動聯繫等方式。
    3. 徒弟認為和師傅的關係較像是朋友的關係,但有感到競爭的存在。師傅則認為較無競爭之感,師傅認為師徒關係較像教練或是朋友。
    4. 在師傅的類型上,師傅所扮演的角色可以歸納為Phillips-Jones所提之「主要的師傅」,因為他們不只關心徒弟們在工作上的專業成長,當徒弟有心理或情緒上的問題時,也可找師傅諮商、討論。
    5.師徒制有助於師徒提升技能與專業知識、拓展人際關係,但在薪水、機會與升遷方面,認為這是基於個人的努力而得。

    The purposes of this study were to explore the process of mentoring used in the case companies and its influence on to employee's career development.The research methods employed was interview. The cases of the study are two insurance companies inTaiwan. There were four employees interviewed in each company . Three of them took the role as mentor for most of the time, and the others are proteges.
    This study arranges these activities based on Kram's idea toward mentoring functions-vocational career and psysical social, and the factors affecting mentoring from mentor and protege's point of view were analyzed.
    The conclusions of this study are:
    1. Mentoring is one of the promotion force for business employees. And proteges can learn from mentors' successful experience and work attitudes to maintain company's culture.
    2. The learning methods used by mentor were classroom teaching, practice, and on site observation. The contact methods are meeting, chatting, discussing, assembling and etc.
    3. From protege's view, mentors took the role as friend; and from mentor's view, mentor acted as friends and coaches. And sometimes the proteges had the feeling of competition, but the mentors didn't have the similar one .
    4. The mentors in case companies took the role as "major mentor" .
    5.Mentoring can improve employees professional knowledge, and broaden his/ her personal network. The increase of salary, opportunity , and promotion is based on one's own contribution.

    中文摘要…………………………………..……….…………………...III 英文摘要…………………………………..……….…………………...IV 目錄……………………………….…………..………………….……...V 表次……………………………………………...………...…………...VII 圖次……………..……………...………………………...…..……….VIII 第一章 緒論 第一節 研究動機……………………………………………….1 第二節 研究目的……………………………………………….4 第三節 研究步驟……………………………………………….5 第四節 重要名詞界定………………………………………….6 第二章 文獻探討 第一節 師徒制理論…………………………………………….8 第二節 員工生涯發展理論……………………………………24 第三節 師徒制與員工生涯發展之關係………………………30 第三章 研究方法 第一節 研究架構………………………………………………33 第二節 研究範圍……………………………………………..34 第三節 研究對象……………………………………………..35 第四節 資料收集與分析……………………………………..36 第五節 研究限制………………………………………………37 第四章 訪談整理 第一節 受訪公司背景與概況…………………………………38 第二節 受訪者背景……………………………………………43 第三節 受訪公司實施師徒制狀況……………………………50 第四節 受訪公司所實施之師徒制對員工生涯發展的影響…92 第五節 實施師徒制的益處……………………………….…101 第六節 研究討論與發現……………………………………..105 第五章 結論與後續建議 第一節 研究結論…………………………………………….108 第二節 後續建議…..……………………………………….116 參考文獻 一、中文部份……………………………………………………...117 二、外文部份………………………………………….………….118 附錄 附錄一 師徒制訪談問卷(師傅)…….………………………122 附錄二 師徒制訪談問卷(徒弟)……………………………124

    一、中文部份
    1.王萬里(民81):師徒經驗與事業成就間關係之研究。台北:輔仁大學管理學研究所碩士論文。
    2.李碧芬譯(民87),成功,有師為伴(Wichman F. 和 Sjodin T.著)。台北市:麥格羅˙希爾台灣分公司。(原作出版於1997年)。
    3.吳芝儀譯(民86),生涯發展的理論與實務(Zunker V. G. 著)。臺北市: 揚智。(原作出版於1994年)
    4.周希敏譯(民84),職場導師(Zey M. G.著)。台北市:方智。(原作出版於1993年)。
    5.林東茂(民86),跨世紀壽險行銷。台南:林東茂。
    6.徐毓豐(民87):平衡計分制度在人力資源發展部門中應用之研究-以壽險業為例。台北,台灣師範大學工業科技教育所碩士論文。
    7.陳漢銘(民82):建立企業員工生涯發展制度之研究。高雄:高雄師範大學工藝教育所碩士論文。
    8.鄒應瑗譯(民80),生涯規畫的藝術。台北:中國生產力中心。
    9.戴素萍(民89),選才+育才=成功。保險行銷,130,P.68-69。
    10.A保險公司網頁
    11.T保險公司網頁

    二、英文部份
    1.Allred, B. B., Snow, C. C., & Miles, R. E. (1996). Characteristics of managerial careers in the 21st century. Academy of Management Executive, 10(4),17-27.
    2.Baugh, S. G., Lankau, M. J., & Scandura, T. A. (1996). An investigation of the effects of protege gender or responses to mentoring. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49, 309-323.
    3.Blumberg, M., & Pringle, C. D. (1982). The missing opportunity in organizational research: Some implications for a theory of work performance. Academy of Management Review, 7, 560-569.
    4.Brown, R. L. (1993a). Making management fun again: Four agencies adopt mentor prog. Manager's Magazine,68(1),12-15.
    5.Brown, R. L. (1993b). Start with structure: Creating a mentoring program. Manager's Magazine,68(1),16-
    6.Burke, R. J. (1984). Mentors in organizations. Group & Organization Studies, 9, 353-372.
    7.Burke, R. J., & McKeen, C. A. (1989). Developing formal mentoring programs in organizations. Business Quarterly, 53, 76-79.
    8.Chao, G. T., Walz, P. M., & Gardner, P. D. (1992). Formal and informal mentorship : A comparison of mentoring functions and contrast with nonmentored counterparts. Personnel Psychology, 45, 1-16.
    9.Clawson, J. G. (1979). Superior-subordinate relationships for managerial development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, School of Business, Harvard University.
    10.Dalton, M. (1959). Men who manage. New York:Wiley.
    11.Dalton, G. W., Thompson, P. H., & Price, R. L. (1977). The four stages of professional careers-A new look at performance by professionals. Organizational Dynamics ,6(1), 19-42.
    12.Dreher, G. F., & Ash, R. A. (1990). A comparative study of mentoring among men and women in managerial, professional, and technical positions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 539-546.
    13.Fagenson, E. A. (1988). The power of a mentor : Proteges and nonproteges perceptions of their own power in organizations. Group and Organization Studies, 13, 182-192.
    14.Fagenson, E. A. (1989). The mentor advantage : Perceived career / job experiences of proteges versus nonproteges. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 10, 309-320.
    15.Fisher B. (1994). Mentoring. London : Library Association Publishing Ltd.
    16.Gutteridge, (1986). Organizational career development systems: The state of the practice. In Hall, D. T. & Associates (Eds.). Career development in organizations. San Franciso : Jossey-Bass.
    17.Hall, D. T. (1976). Career in organization. Santa Monica, CA. : Goodyear.
    18.Hall, D. T. (1986). Career development in organizations. San Franciso : Jossey-Bass.
    19.Hall, D. T. (1996). Protean careers of the 21st century. Academy of Management Executive, 10(4), 8-16.
    20.Hall, D. T. & Mirvis, P. H. (1995). Careers as lifelong learning. In A. Howard (Ed.), The changing nature of work (pp.323-361). San Franciso : Jossey-Bass.
    21.Herr, E. L., & Cramer, S. H. (1984). Career guidance and counseling through the life span. Boston, [Mass.] : Little, Brown.
    22.House, J. S. (1981). Work,stress, and social support. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
    23.Hunt, D. M., & Michael, C. (1983). A career training and development tool. Academy of management Review, 8, 475-485.
    24.Jacques, E. (1965). Death and mid-life crisis. International Journal of Psychoanalsis, 46, 502-514.
    25.Jennings, E. E. (1971). Routes to the executive suite. New York:McGraw-Hill,.
    26.Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York:Basic Books.
    27.Kram, K. E. (1983). Phases of the mentor relationship. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 608-625.
    28.Kram, K. E. (1985). Mentoring at work. Glenview,IL : Scott, Foresman & Co.
    29. Kram, K. E. (1988). Mentoring in the workplace. In Douglas T. H. and Associates (Eds.), Career Development in Organizations. (PP.170-201).San Franciso : Jossey-Bass.
    30. Kram, K. E. & Isabella, L. A. (1985). Alternatives to mentoring: The role of peer relationships in career development. Academy of Management Journal,28 , 110-132.
    31.Kram, K. E., & Jusela, G. (1978). Anticipation and realization: A study of retirement. Unpublished research report, Department of Administrative Science, Yale University.
    32.Levinsion, D. J., Darrow, C. N., Klein, E. B., Levision, M. H., & McKee, B. (1978). The seasons of man's life. N.Y.: A. A. Knopf.
    33.McManus E. & Russell E. A. (1997). New directions for mentoring research: An examination of related constructs. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 51, 145-161.
    34.Murray M. & Owen M. A. (1991). Beyond the myths and magic of mentoring. San Franciso, CA. : Jossey-Bass.
    35.Murray-Hicks, M., & Nugent, J. (1971).Positive Motivation Process for Changing Human Behavior. Paper presented at the National Society for Performance and Instuuction Conference, Rochester, N.Y.
    36.Murray-Hicks, M. (1972). Generic Model for a facilitated Mentoring Program. Oakland, CA. : MMHA.
    37.Nicholson, N. (1996). Information age. Academy of Management Executive, 10(4), 40-51.
    38.Noe, R. A. (1988b). An investigation of the determinants of successful assigned mentoring relationships,. Personnel Psychology, 41, 457-479.
    39.Olian, J. D., Carroll, S. J., & Giannantonio, C. M. (1993). Mentor reactions to proteges : An experience with managers. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 43, 266-268.
    40.Ostroff, C., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (1993). The role of mentoring in the information gathering processes of newcomers during early organizational socialization.. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 42, 170-183.
    41.Phillips, L. L.(1977). Mentors and proteges: A study of the career development of women managers and executives in business and industry. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, UCLA.
    42.Phillips-Jones, L. (1982). Mentors and Proteges. New York : Arbor House.
    43.Russell, J. E. A. (1991).Career development interventions in organizations. Journal of Vocational Behavior,38, 237-287.
    44.Russell, J. E. A. & Eby, L. T. (1993). Career assessment strategies for women in management. Journal of Career Assessment, 1, 267-293.
    45.Schein, E. D. (1978). Career dynamics : Matching individual an organizational needs. Reading, M. A. : Addison-Wesley.
    46.Scandura, T. A., & Schriesheim, C. A. (1991). Effects of structural characteristics of mentoring dyads on protege career outcomes. In D. F. Ray and M. E. Schnake (Eds.), Proceedings of the Southern Management Association (pp. 206-208). Mississippi State, MS : Southern Management Association.
    47.Scandura, T. A. (1992). Mentorship and career mobility : An empirical investigation. Journal of Organizational Behaviior, 13, 169-174.
    48. Scandura, T. A. & Ragins, B. R. (1993). The effects of sex and gender role orientation on mentorship in male-dominated occupations. Journal of Vocational behavior, 43, 251-265.
    49. Scandura, T. A. & Viator, R. E. (1994). Mentoring in public accounting firms : An analysis of mentor-protege relationships, mentorship functions and protege turnover intension. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 19, 717-734.
    50.Shapiro, E. C., Haseltine, F. P., & Rowe, M. P. (1978). Role models, mentors, and the patron system. Sloan Management Review, 19(3), 51-58.
    51.Stumpf SA, & London M. (1981). Management promotions : Individual and organizational factors affecting the decision process. Academy of Management Review, 6, 539-550.
    52.Super, D. E. (1976). Career education and the meaning of work. Monographs on career education. Washington, DC: The office of career Education.
    53.Tejeda, M. J. (1994). A knowledge elucidation study of the heuristics used by mentors in the selection of proteges. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Miami.

    QR CODE