對數位閱讀時代的來臨，電子書替代紙本書籍已是未來的趨勢，但當電子書成為學習的主要工具時，對於學生的學習會帶來何種影響？以此為動機進行相關研究，本研究主要首先探討不同學習風格的學生使用電子書學習的表現，然後研析學生與教師對於使用電子書學習有何看法？提出實用對策，提供欲推動使用電子書之相關單位參考。
研究對象為大學部學生，採用學習風格問卷來分析學習者的學習風格類型，接著以「電子書使用性問卷」和「APP實作軟體使用性問卷」瞭解學生對於使用電子書與APP是否適用。最後使用半結構式訪談瞭解學生與教師對使用電子書與APP軟體之趨向。
研究結果發現：
（一）使用電子書進行學習的學生以反思型為最多，其次為實際型學生。
(二)不同學習風格學生對於使用電子書進行學習的使用性有差異，整體而言以理論型學生最為適用。
(三) 不同學習風格學生對於使用電子書進行學習的學習成績有差異，其中以理論型學生學習成績最佳。
(四)電子書使用性與學生成績有相關性。

With the rise of digital reading, it seems inevitable for printed books to be replaced by e-books. However, we need to understand how student learning would be affected when e-books become the major learning tool. Despite the advantages of reading e-books on portable devices, many students still prefer the use of printed books when studying. This preference may be potentially affected by student learning styles and strategies. These questions gave rise to the research motive and our investigation on student performance and student use of e-books and how both were related to their learning styles. We also surveyed student and instructor opinions on the use of e-books for learning. The results of our investigation would provide a referential basis for institutions and authorities concerned with the promotion of e-books for student use.

Senior undergraduates students participated in this research. Research tools included a Learning Style Questionnaire to determine student learning style, E-book Usability Questionnaire and the APP Usability Questionnaire to evaluate the adequacy of the e-books among students, as well as semi-structured interviews to assess and analyze student and instructor feedback on the use of e-books.

The following lists the research findings:
1. Students who used the e-books tend to be reflectors, followed by pragmatists
2. There were differences in e-book usability for the learning between students with different learning styles. The use of e-books was most compatible with theoretical students.
3. Student performance differed based on their learning styles, with theoretical students receiving higher scores.
4. There were correlations between usability of e-books and student performance in the course.

王宗斌（1999）。訓練方式、電腦自我效能及學習型態對學習績效的影響-網頁設計實地研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中央大學，新竹縣。
王秋華（2001）。網路教學之學生學習行為與學習滿意度及學習績效的關係(未出版之碩士論文)。大葉大學，彰化縣。
江盈慧（2010）。從學習風格探析高齡者資訊通訊科技的使用(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中山大學，高雄市。
何怡慧(2003)。大學生思考風格量表修訂及其相關因素之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中山大學，高雄市。
何薇玲（2011）。電子書產業發展趨勢。研考雙月刊，35（1），13-21。
巫靜宜（2000），比較網路教學與傳統教學之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。淡江大學，台北縣。
林宜蓉（2009）。多媒體電子書對英語學習者閱讀態度的影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。
林宗毅（2013）。運用眼動分析於擴增實境數位學習系統之使用性評估研究(未出版之碩士論文) 。國立臺南大學，台南市。
林亮慈(2011)。多媒體繪本融入英語補教教學對國小低成就學童閱讀理解與學習態度之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。亞洲大學，台中市。
林惠愛（2012）。使用平板電腦閱讀電子書對國小學童閱讀能力與態度影響之研究(未出版之碩士論文) 。國立臺灣師範大學，台北市。
林美和（1992）。智能障礙研究：學習問題與行為輔導。台北：師大書苑。
吳百薰 (1998)：國小學生學習風格相關因素之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台中師範學院，台中市。
吳淑燕（2012）。電子教科書運用於國中英語WebQuest教學之行動研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學，臺北市。
吳維慈（2012）。互動式電子白板融入國小高年級視覺藝術課程之教學研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。
吳善彰（2008）。中文維基百科網站之使用性評估研究(未出版之碩士論文) 。世新大學，台北市。
邱炯友（2000）。電子出版的歷史與未來。佛教圖書館館訊，23，
周暐達（2011）。2010 年臺灣數位出版業市場概況。張崇仁總編輯，2011 出 版年鑑（頁22-31）。臺北市：行政院新聞局。
陳眉期（2011）。擴增實境輔助立體幾何概念學習系統之使用性暨學習效益評估(未出版之碩士論文) 。國立臺南大學，台南市。
陳俊瑋（2006）。數位學習系統之設計原則研究-以故宮為例(未出版之碩士論文) 。國立交通大學，新竹市。
張春興（1991）。現代心理學。臺北市：東華書局。
張春興（2004）。心理學概要。臺北市：東華書局。
張敬于（2011）。不同學習風格學生在電腦多媒體教學的學習成就表現-以遺傳單元為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學，彰化市。
張峻愷（2011）。建構 Web 2.0 教學平台使用效能測試方法之研究(未出版之碩士論文) 。淡江大學，台北市。
趙貞怡（2004）。Hyperbook系統在國小國語科數位學習上的應用。國立臺北師範學院學報：數理科技教育類，17(1)，215-237頁。
郭重卲（1987）。評介學習風格之有關研究。資優教育月刊，23，7-16。
施雅茹（2010）。E-Reader 之新興人機界面發展探索。ITIS 智網。
程蘊嘉（2002）。網路時代的新閱讀風貌--電子書。全國新書資訊月刊，42，8-11。
童敏惠（2002）。當圖書館遇到電子書。臺北市立圖書館館訊，20(2)，1-13。
賴怡如（2007）。工業設計系學生的學習風格與自我反思能力之關係(未出版之碩士論文)。大同大學，臺北市。
顧大維 劉岳旻，2011，由優使性測試觀點探究數位學習平台之介面設計-以 WebCT 平台為例，永達學報，10，72-87 頁。
駱英豐（2000）。電子書(eBook)對圖書館的挑戰。國立成功大學圖書館館刊，6。
Agarwal, R., Sambamurthy, V., & Stair, R. M. (2000). Research report: The evolving relationship between general and specific computer self-efficacy-an empirical assessment. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 418-430.
Barnard, L., Lan, W. Y., To, Y. M., Paton, V. O., & Lai, S. L. (2009). Measuring self-regulation in online and blended learning environments. Internet and Higher Education, 12,1-6
Butler, A. (1982). Learning style across content areas. In J. W. Keefe (Ed.),Studentlearning styles and brain behavior: Programs, instrumentation research. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
Cassidy, S., & Eachus, P. (2000). Learning style, academic belief system, self-report student proficiency and academic achievement in higher education. Educational Psychology, 20(3), 307-322.
Claxton, C. B., ＆ Ralston, Y.(1978). Learning style:Their impact on teaching and administration. (AAHE-ERIC/Higher Eduction Research Report No.10.Washington, D. C.:American Association for Higher Education(ERIC Document Reporduction Service N0.ED 167065)
Collinson, E. (2000). A survey of elementary students’ learning style preferences and academic success. Contemporary Education, 71(4), 42-46
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science,35(8), 982-1003
Donald T. H.(2000).Electronic Books: a major publishing revolution. Online, 24 (4),p16.
Dunn, R., and Dunn, K. (1978). Teaching students through their individual learning styles: A practical approach. Reston, Va.: Reston.
Entwistle, N. J. (1981). Styles of Learning and Teaching. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
Garger, S. & Guild, P. (1984) . Learning styles: the crucial differences.
Curriculum Review. 23(1), 9-12.
Gregoric,A.F.(1979).Learning/teaching styles〆Potent forces behing them. Educational Leadership,36(4),234-236.
Hunt, D. E. (1979). Learning style and student needs: An introduction to conceptual level. In National Association of Secondary School Principals (Ed.). Student learning styles: Diagnosing and prescribing programs. Reston, VA: Reston Publishing Company.
Keefe, J. W.(1982). Assessing student learning styles: An overview In NASSP(Ed.), Student learning styles and Brain behavior. Reston VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
Kerr, M. A. & Symons, S. E. (2006). Computerized presentation of text : effects on children’s reading of information material. Reading and Writing, 19 (1), 1-10.
Kolb, D.A.(1976). Organizational Psychology :A book of Readings，Prentice-Hall。
Lin, T.-C., & Huang, C.-C. (2008). Understanding knowledge management System usage antecedents: An integration of social cognitive theory and task technology fit. Information and Management, 45(6), 410-417.
Malcom, P. J., Lutz, W. C., Gerken, M. A., & Hooltke, G. M. (1981). Learning style identification scale handbook. California: McGraw-Hill.
Rafe, G., & Manley, J. H. (1997). Learning style and instructional methods In a graduate level engineering program delivered by video teleconferencing technology. IEEE 1997 Frontiers in Education Conference, 1607-1612.
Rasmussen, K. L., and Davidson-Shivers, G. V. (1998). Hypermedia and learning Styles: Can performance be influenced. Journal of Education Multimedia and Hypermedia, 7(4), 291-308.
Rosenberg M. J. (2001). E-learning: Strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital age. New York : McGraw-Hill .
Schmeck, R. R. (1983). Learning styles of college student. In R. F. Dillion & R. R. Schemck (Eds). Individual differences in cognition (pp. 133-279). New York Academic Press.
Sein, M.K., & Robey, D., (1991). Learning style and efficacy of computer training methods. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 72, 243-248.
Smith, Donna. & Kolb, David. A. (1985). User guide for the learning-style inventory. Boston: McBer and Company.
Smith, R.M. (1982). Learning how to learn: Applied learning theory for adults. New York: Cambridge.
Snyder, R. F. (2000). The relationship between learning styles and Academic achievement of high school. The High School Journal, 83(2), 11-20.
Snyder, R., Raben, C., & Farr. J. (1980). A Model for the Systemic Evaluation Human Resource Development Programs. Academy Management Review, 5(3): 431-444.
Sternberg, R.J. (1994). Allowing of thinking styles. Educational Leadership,52(3), 36-40.
Sternberg, R.J. (1996). Successful intelligence: How practical and Creative intelligence determine success in life. New York: Simon & Schuster.students.
Wells, J.B., and Layne, B.H., & Allen, D. (1991). Management Development Training and Learning Styles. Public Productivity & Management review, 14(4), 415-428 .
Wexley, K. N. ＆ Latham G. P. (1981). Developing and training human resource in organizations Glenview. IL: Scott Foresman.
Witkin, H., & Goodenough, D. (1981). Cognitive styles: Essence and origins.New York: International Universities Press, Inc.
Zabriskie, R., & Mccormick, B. (2001). The influences of family leisure patterns on perceptions of Family functioning: Family Relations, 50(3), 281-289.