簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 胡淼
MIAO HU
論文名稱: 基本歸因謬誤的視角
Perspective Taking in Fundamental Attribution Error
指導教授: 沈永正
Shen, Yung-Cheng
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理研究所
Graduate Institute of Management
論文出版年: 2016
畢業學年度: 105
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 55
中文關鍵詞: 基本歸因謬誤視角觀察者行為者
英文關鍵詞: Fundamental attribution error, perspective thinking, actor, observer
DOI URL: https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202204663
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:131下載:18
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 基本歸因謬誤是指,人們在思考某些後果或行為的成因時,經常會高估個人因素,低估情境因素。即人們常常把他人的行為歸因到性格和內在特質上,而忽略了他們所處環境的重要性。最典型的例子就是自己的成功是因為自己努力,別人的成功別人幸運;自己的失敗是因為自己不幸運,別人的失敗是因為他們不夠努力。是本研究主要在探討通過一些方式,比如:視角的轉換、人物角色的轉換、情結果的不同這些因素的轉變,是否可以減少基本歸因謬誤的產生。

    Fundamental attribution error means that some people think about the causes or consequences of their behavior,at that time individuals often overestimate personal factors,and the situational factors are always underestimated.They often attributed the actions of others to inherent character traits,while ignoring the importance of their environment.The most typical examples are ,one believes that their success is due to their own efforts and the success of others is attributed to luck;and one’s failure is due to misfortune,while others fail due to lack of effect. This study is to explore various methods,such as,perspective conversion and conversion of characters.The different transitions of these factors can result in the reduction of the fundamental attribution error generation.Fundamental attribution error is the consideration of the cause and consequence of one’s own behavior. Managerial implication and recommendations for future research and provided.

    目錄 第一章 緒論 第一節 研究背景與動機------------------------------------------ 7 第二節 研究問題與目的------------------------------------------ 8 第二章 文獻探討 第一節 歸因、歸因的維度及判斷標準-----------------------10 第二節 從視角角度看基本歸因謬誤-------------------------15 第三節 從道德角度看基本歸因謬誤-------------------------17 第三章 研究方法 第一節 研究變數與架構-----------------------------------------22 第二節 研究變數與實驗-----------------------------------------26 第三節 研究變數與定義-----------------------------------------28 第四章 實驗結果 第一節 敘述性統計分析-----------------------------------------31 第二節 假說檢定---------------------------------------------------32 第五章 結論 第一節 研究與結論-----------------------------------------------41 第二節 學術貢獻與實務貢獻-----------------------------------42 第三節 研究限制與後續研究建議----------------------------42 附錄------------------------------------------------------------43 參考文獻--------------------------------------------------------53

    中文參考文獻
    巴澤曼,M.H.管理決策中的判斷[M].杜偉宇、李同吉譯.北京:人民郵電出版社,2007.
    約翰•W.桑特羅克(John W.Santrock)心理學和我們[M].上海社會科學院出版社,2008:507
    J.L費裏德曼 D.O 西爾斯 J.M卡爾史密斯合著 社會心理學[M]黑龍江人民出版社,1984
    DM 巴斯.進化心理學:心理的新科學(第二版)[M].熊哲宏、張勇、晏倩譯,上海:華東師範大學出版社,2070.
    孫玉石 間析歸因偏差產生的原因及對策[ M ].時代教育
    斯科特•普勞斯.決策與判斷[M].施俊琦、王星譯.2004年9月第1版.北京:人民郵電出版社, 2004 .
    周菲.抉策人質偏差的認知心理學分析 [J]. 北京行政學院學報,2008,(5).

    英文參考文獻
    Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment.

    Wirtz, D., Chiu, C. Y., Diener, E., & Oishi, S. (2009). What Constitutes a Good Life? Cultural Differences in the Role of Positive and Negative Affect in Subjective Well‐Being. Journal of personality, 77(4), 1167-1196.

    Gilbert, D. T. (1998). Speeding with Ned: A personal view of the correspondence bias. Attribution and social interaction: The legacy of Edward E. Jones, 5-66.

    Gilbert, D. T., & Malone, P. S. (1995). The correspondence bias.Psychological bulletin, 117(1), 21.

    Heider, F. (1983). The life of a psychologist: An autobiography. Univ Pr of Kansas.

    Jones, E. E. (1987). Retrospective Review: The Seer Who Found Attributional Wisdom in Naivety.

    Jones, E. E., & Harris, V. A. (1967). The attribution of attitudes. Journal of experimental social psychology, 3(1), 1-24.

    Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions the attribution process in person perception. Advances in experimental social psychology,2, 219-266.

    Kassin, S. M., & Pryor, J. B. (1985). The development of attribution processes. In The development of social cognition (pp. 3-34). Springer New York.

    Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In Nebraska symposium on motivation. University of Nebraska Press.

    Kelley, H. H., & Thibault, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: a theory of interdependance. New York, J.

    Libby, L. K., Eibach, R. P., & Gilovich, T. (2005). Here's looking at me: the effect of memory perspective on assessments of personal change. Journal of personality and social psychology, 88(1), 50.

    SARNA, D. A. (2015). A THEORETICAL MODEL OF JOB SATISFACTION AND ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT FOR ACADEMICIANS IN TECHNICAL AND MANAGEMENT INSTITUTES OF DEVELOPING COUNTRIES LIKE INDIA AND REVIEW OF LITERATURE. International Journal of Marketing, Financial Services and Management Research, 4(1).
    Mullen, B., & Goethals, G. R. (1990). Social projection, actual consensus and valence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29(3), 279-282.
    Mullen, B., & Goethals, G. R. (1990). Social projection, actual consensus and valence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29(3), 279-282.

    Nisbett, R. E., & Borgida, E. (1975). Attribution and the psychology of prediction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(5), 932.

    Norenzayan, A., & Nisbett, R. E. (2000). Culture and causal cognition.Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(4), 132-135.
    Reeder, G. D. (1982). Let's give the fundamental attribution error another chance.

    Lee, R., & Nisbett Richard, E. (1991). The person and the situation: Perspectives of social psychology.

    Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. Advances in experimental social psychology, 10, 173-220.

    Sabini, J., Siepmann, M., & Stein, J. (2001). " The Really Fundamental Attribution Error in Social Psychological Research". Psychological inquiry,12(1), 1-15.

    Sedikides, C., Campbell, W. K., Reeder, G. D., & Elliot, A. J. (1998). The self-serving bias in relational context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(2), 378.

    Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. In Utility, probability, and human decision making (pp. 141-162). Springer Netherlands.

    Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1986). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Judgment and decision making: An interdisciplinary reader, 38-55.

    Tooby, J. (1992). The Psychological Foundations of Culture. The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture. J. Barkow, L. Cosmides and J. Tooby.

    White, P. A. (1988). Causal processing: Origins and development.Psychological Bulletin, 104(1), 36.

    Davison, W. P. (1983). The third-person effect in communication. Public opinion quarterly, 47(1), 1-15.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE