研究生: |
曾筱君 Hsiao-Chun Tseng |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
網路瀏覽行為的背景效果 The Context Effect on web browsing. |
指導教授: |
沈永正
Shen, Yung-Cheng |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
管理研究所 Graduate Institute of Management |
論文出版年: | 2013 |
畢業學年度: | 101 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 58 |
中文關鍵詞: | 同化效果 、對比效果 、背景效果 、相似性 、區辨性 、網路行銷 |
英文關鍵詞: | Assimlation effect, contrast effect, context effect, similarity, distinctiveness, online marketing |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:267 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
同化對比作用在實體環境中廣泛被運用,業者運用消費者心理,讓其產品與腦海中特定商品比較時能夠勝出,而做足了努力。哪些情況下會產生同化效果,哪些情況下會產生對比效果,一直是學者不斷在探索的議題,並應用在行銷廣告領域。
而這股戰火隨著科技的發展而蔓延到網際網路,網路行銷已經是種普遍的概念,本研究欲將同化對比效果在網際網路環境做驗證,因此選定了相似性(similarity)與區辨性(Distinctiveness)在網路上做實驗,探討同樣的變數在網路環境中是否也能引起同樣的同化對比效果。
1. Arnould, E., Price, L., and Zinkhan, G. (2002). Consumers, New York: NY, McgrawHill.
2. Bless, H., & Schwarz, N. (2010). Mental construal and the emergence of assimilation and contrast effects: The inclusion/exclusion model. In M.P. Zanna (ed), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 42, pp319-373.
3. Cohen, A. R., E. Stotland and D. M. Wolfe (1995). "An Experimental Investigation of Need for Cognition." Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology No.51, pp. 291-294.
4. Diederik A. Stapel & Piotr Winkielman. (1998), “Assimilation and Contrast as a Function of Context-Target Similarity, Distinctness, and Dimensional Relevance”, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 24 No.6, pp.634-646
5. Haines, George H., Jr. (1974), "Process Models of Consumer Decision Making," inBuyer/Consumer Information Processing, ed. G. David Hughes and Michael L. Ray, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
6. Herr, Paul M., Steven J. Sherman & Russell H. Fazio (1983),“On the Consequence of Priming: Assimilation and Contrast Effects, ”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol.19, pp.323-340.
7. Herr, Paul M. (1986),“Consequence of Priming: Judgment and Behavior,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.51, No. 6, pp.1106-1115.
8. Levin, Irwin P. & Aron M. Levin (2000), “Modeling the Role of Brand Alliances in the Assimilation of Product Evaluations,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp.43-52.
9. Meyers-Levy, Joan & Brian Sternthal (1993),“A Two-Factor Explanation of
Assimilation and Contrast Effects”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 30 No6, pp.359-368.
10. Martin, Leonard L., John J. Seta & Rick A. Crelia (1990),“Assimilation and Contrast as a Function of People's Willingness and Ability to Expend Effort in Forming an Impression,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 59, No. 1, pp.27-37.
11. Martin, Leonard L.& John J. Seta (1983), “ Perceptions of Unity and Distinctiveness as Derterminants of Attraction”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol44, No.4, pp.755-764
12. Martin, L. L.(1986).
13. Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T. & Schumann, D. (1983).” Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement. “Journal of Consumer Research, No.10(3), pp. 135-146.
14. Petty, R. E., and John T. Cacioppo (forthcoming a),” Attitude Change: Central and Peripheral Routes to Persuasion”, New York: Springer/Verlag
15. Petty, Richard E. and John T. Cacioppo (1984a), “The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion,” Advances in Consumer Research, No.6,pp. 673-675.
16. Petty, Richard E. and John T. Cacioppo (1984b), “Source Factors and the Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion,” Advances in Consumer Research, No.6,pp. 668-672.
17. Petty, Richard E. and John T. Cacioppo (1982), “The Need for Cognition,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, No.42, pp.116-131.
18. Schiffman, Leon G. and Leslie Lazar Kanuk (2000), Consumer Behavior 7th, NewJersey: Prentice-Hall.
19. Sherif, M., & Hovland, C. I. (1961).” Social judgment: Assimilation and contrast effects in communication and attitude change”. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
20. Stapel, D. A., Koomen, W., & van der Pligt (1997). “Categories of category accessibility: The impact of trait versus exemplar priming on person judgments.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, No33,pp.44–76.
21. Stapel, D. A, & Spears, R (1996).” Even accessibility and context effects in causal inference: Judgment of a different order.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, No.22,pp. 979-992.
22. Staple, Diederik A. & Piotr Winkielman (1998),“Assimilation and Contrast
as a Function of Context-Target Similarity, Distinctness, and Dimensional
Relevance,”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 24, No. 6,
June, pp.634-646.
23. Strack, Schwarz& Bless(1993). “Awarness of the influence as a determinant of assimilation versus contrast” European Journal of Socail Psychology,Vol.23, 5342
24. Wyer, R. S., & Srull, T. K. (1989).” Memory and social cognition in its social context”. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.