本研究針對2002年6月2日至2009年7月31日《中國時報》與《聯合報》全球暖化新聞及2009年8月8日到2009年11月8日之「八八風災」新聞，從報導趨勢、新聞框架以及環境新聞報導問題等三方面檢視兩報全球暖化議題的報導表現，並援引國內外環境新聞與氣候變遷媒體議題研究文獻，作為兩報全球暖化議題報導趨勢與框架特性的分析依據。
本研究根據內容分析法，從媒體七年來的框架趨勢研究發現媒體在全球暖化議題上，確實充分應用了框架的功能來定義全球暖化問題，不僅跟隨國際環保潮流等新文化價值裁定暖化和事件的因果關係、且擅自診斷事件肇因，但卻缺乏因果關係的佐證能力。而對於全球暖化的影響，則是根據事件而採用不同的報導框架下價值判斷，卻缺少強調環境倫理等道德論述。此外在建議補救辦法的部份，則將責任歸咎於國家政府，特別是在面對異常氣候的在地調適行動上，但缺乏層次較高的跨國和個人責任的呼籲。本研究認為環境新聞報導應改變事件導向的報導模式，主動監測議題發展並長期追蹤報導，在論述方式上，除了加強國際氣候會議與協議等重要事件的報導之外，應從台灣在地的暖化事件出發來延伸議題面向，提升議題的框架層次，強化記者的佐證能力，建立民眾參與感，以型塑抗暖化為國內重要的公共議題為優先目標。

一、 中文文獻
Berger, P. L. & Luckmann, T. (1991)。《知識社會學：社會實體的建構》 (The Social Construction of Reality : A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge) (鄒理民譯)，台北：巨流出版社。(原作1966年出版)。
Jensen, B. K., Jankowski, W. N. (1996)。《大眾傳播硏究方法:質化取向》(A Handbook of Qualitative Methodologies for Mass Communication Research ) (唐維敏譯)，台北市 : 五南。(原作1991年出版)。
Krieghbaum, H.（1994）。《科學與大眾媒介》(Science and the Mass Media)(謝瀛春譯)，台北：遠流。(原作1968年出版)。
Leopold, A. (2005)。《沙郡年記：李奧帕德的自然沉思》(A Sand County Almanac with other essays on conservation from Round River)(吳美真譯)，台北：天下文化。(原作1949出版)。
McQuail, D. (2003)。《特新大眾傳播理論》(Mass Communication Theory: An Introduction, 4th ed.)(陳芸芸、劉慧雯譯)，台北：韋伯文化。(原作2000年出版)
Mibrath, L. W. (1994)。《不再寂靜的春天》 (Envisioning A Sustainable Socirty) (鄭曉時譯)，台北：天下文化。 (原作1994年出版)。
Rolston, H., III. (1996)。《環境倫理學》 (Environmental Ethics:Duties to and Values in the Natural World) (王瑞香譯)，台北：國立編譯館。(原作1988年出版)。
Wimmer, R.D., Dominick, J.R. (1995)。《大衆媒體硏究》(Mass Media Research) (李天任、藍莘等譯)，台北市 : 亞太。(原作1991年出版)。
大紀元新聞查詢：http://www.epochtimes.com/ (98.5.1上網)。
中央社新聞查詢：http://www.cna.com.tw/ (98.5.1上網)。
王玉燕 (2007)。《環境議題紀錄片的敘事策略研究：一個集體行動框架的觀點》，未出版之碩士論文，國立政治大學新聞研究所。
王石番（1991）。《傳播內容分析法》，台北：幼獅。
王石番（1999）。《傳播內容分析法─理論與實證》，台北：幼獅。
王景平、廖學誠 (2006)。〈公共電視「我們的島」節目中環境議題的時空分布特性〉，《地理學報》，43，69-60。
生態關懷者協會(2007/8/19)。柯倍德環境倫理系列。網址：http://www.tesa.org.tw/ (98.5.5上網)。
朱涵（2007）。《台灣報紙再現“外籍新娘＂之研究－以聯合報、自由時報為例》，未出版之碩士論文，世新大學新聞研究所在職專班碩士論文。
艾爾‧高爾(Al Gore) (2001)。《瀕危的地球》 (Earth in the Balance) (楊憲宏、許洋主、蔣家語、何亞威譯)，台北市：雙月書屋。
低碳生活部落格網址：http://lowestc.blogspot.com/ (98.4.31上網)。
余範英、呂理德 (2008)。《淡水河之歌續篇》，台北市；時報文化。
李永展 (2000)。《永續發展：大地反撲的省思》，台北：巨流。
林生傳(2003)。《教育研究法》，台北：心理。
林怡瑩（2003）。《高科技管制對勞工流動與工作權保障的影響》，未出版之碩士論文，國立政治大學新聞研究所。
林東泰 (1997)。《大眾傳播理論》，台北：師大書苑。
林建利 (2007)。《網咖與網路遊戲新聞之建構－框架分析與社會認知的觀點》，未出版之碩士論文，國立中正大學電訊傳播研究所碩士論文。
林斯凱 (2002)。《台灣工業環保新聞分析-以新竹科學園區的報導為例》，未出版之碩士論文，國立政治大學新聞研究所。
邱碧婷 (2007)。《全球暖化下新興的媒介議題內容分析與意見領袖傳播行為之研究—以「京都議定書」為例》，未出版之碩士論文，世新大學廣播電視電影硏究所碩士論文。
紀駿傑 (1998)。〈我們沒有共同的未來：西方主流「環保」關懷的政治經濟學〉，《台灣社會研究季刊》，31，141-168。
胡幼偉(2005)。《爭議性外交議題之新聞文本框架分析：以「凱德磊隱匿訪台」事件為例》，2005中華傳播學會年會論文。
倪炎元 (1999)。〈批評論述分析與媒介研究之初探－兼論其在華文媒介上的應用〉，《傳播管理學刊》，1，205-233。
徐瑞婷 (2008)。《從環境傳播探討政府、民眾與媒體角色─以環境影響評估制度為例》，未出版之碩士論文，臺灣大學新聞研究所碩士論文。
財團法人卓越新聞獎基金會網址：http://www.feja.org.tw/ (98.4.5上網)。
馬以工(1998)。〈環境保護與社會發展-環境與文化〉，《環境與人-環境保護篇》，6(4)。台北：遠流。
國立清華大學生命科學系網站(無日期)。台灣瑰寶─櫻花鉤吻鮭的家。網址：http://www.life.nthu.edu.tw/~labtcs/Salmon/ (98.5.1 上網)。
張依依 (2009)。〈危機傳播新策略─以框架理論重探三哩島核電和飲料廠腸病毒危機案例〉，《傳播與社會學刊》，8，55-73。
張楊乾(2009/5/22)。美版溫減法 闖過第一關。台達電子文教基金會，網址：http://www.delta-foundation.org.tw/editor/editor_detail.asp?fid=1&tpid=571 (98年5月30上網)。
張靖媛(2004/4/21)。從生活與消費型態看菁英族群。全球華文行銷知識庫，網址：http://www.cyberone.tw/ItemDetailPage/SearchResult/05SearchResultContent.asp?Keyword=亞洲菁英市場調查&MMContentNoID=7680 (98.5.12上網)。
許晃雄(1999)。《人為的全球暖化與氣候變遷》，「環保聯盟」。The 4th International Conference of Atmospheric Action Network East Asia, Taiepi。網址：http://www.sciscape.org/articles/global_warning1/#sec6。(上網時間：98年9月22日)
郭綉娟(2008/11/24)。2008國際回顧：歐巴馬當選美國總統 NGO支持環保政策。環境資訊中心，網址：http://e-info.org.tw/node/39207 (98.5.15上網)。
陳光璞 (2009)。《媒體報導的風險議題與風險溝通-以全球暖化議題為例》，未出版之碩士論文，世新大學公共關係暨廣告學研究所碩士論文。
陳靜茹 (2007)。《全球暖化與京都議定書議題之研究—以分析2001-2007年紐約時報新聞為例》，未出版之碩士論文，世新大學廣播電視電影學研究所碩士論文。
陳韻如 (1993)。《新聞事件的意義建構與受眾認知關係之研究-從受眾推論看新聞框架之影響》，未出版之碩士論文，政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。
楊孝濚（1989）。〈內容分析法〉，《社會及行為科學研究法下冊》。台北：東華書局。
廖港民（1980）。《我國報紙處理國際新聞之分析研究-以中央日報、中國時報、聯合報及大華晚報為研究對象》，未出版之碩士論文，政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。
臧國仁 (1999)。《新聞媒體與消息來源-媒介框架與真實建構之論述》，台北：三民書局。
臧國仁、鍾蔚文（1997）。〈框架概念與公共關係策略—有關運用媒介框架的探析〉，《廣告學研究》，9，99-130。
蔡美瑛 （1995）。〈議題設定理論之發展—從領域遷徙、理論延展到理論整合〉，《新聞學研究》，50，97-124。
蕭旻禎 (2004)。《從環境政治觀點論地球暖化現象之防制-以1997年京都議定書為例》，未出版之碩士論文，文化大學政治學研究所碩士論文。
謝瀛春（2006）。〈從科學傳播理論的角度—談臺灣的科普困境〉，《科普研究》，3，16-21。
鍾蔚文 (1992)。《從媒介真實到主觀真實》，台北：正中書局。
瞿文芳 (2002)。《報紙報導環保事件議題建構過程之研究 : 以阿瑪斯號漏油汙染事件為例》，未出版之碩士論文，世新大學傳播所碩士論文。
羅世宏 (1994)。《後蔣經國時代的國家，主流報業與反對運動：國家認同議題的媒介框架分析》，未出版之碩士論文，政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。
二、 英文文獻
Antilla, L. (2008). Self-censorship and science: a geographical review of media coverage of climate tipping points. Public Understanding of Science, 17, 1–17.
Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, Londan:SAGE.
Beck. U. (1995).Ecological Enlightenment: Essays on the Politics of the Risk Society, trans. M. Ritter. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.
Bell, A. (1994). Media (mis)communication on the science of clinate change. Public Understanding of Science, 3, 259-275.
Berelson, B. (1952).Content Analysis in Communication Research. New York: Hafher Publishing Company.
Bower, J. L. (1970). Managing the Resource Allocation Process. Boston, Mass.:Harvard Business School Press.
Boykoff, M.T. (2008) . Lost in Tanslation? United States Television Coverage of Anthropogenic Climate Change,1995–2004. Climatic Change, 86: 1–11.
Brookfield, H. (1988). sustainable development and the environment. journal of development studies, 25, 125-35.
Brossard, D., Shanahan, J., & McComas, K. (2004). Are Issue-Cycle Culturally Constructed? A Comparsion of French and American Coverage of Global Climate Change. Mass Communcation & Society, 7(3), 359-377.
Callicott. J. B. (1999). Beyond the Land Ethic: More Essays in Environmental Philosophy, Albany: State University of New York Press.
Carvalho, A. (2007). Ideological cultures and media discourses on scientific knowledge: re-reading news on climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 16, 223-243.
Cox, R. (2006). Environmental Communication and the Public Sphere. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Downs, A. (1972). Up and Down With Ecology: The "Issue-Attention Cycle. Public Interest, 28, 38-50.
Dunwoody, S. (1999) . Scientists, Journalists and the Meaning of Uncertainty. In S.M. Friedman, S. Dunwoody and C.L. Rogers (eds) , Communicating Uncertainty: Media Coverage of New and Controversial Science, (pp. 59–80). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Einsiedel, E. & Coughlan, E. (1993). The Canadian Press and the Environment: Reconstructing a Social Reality. In A. Hansen (ed.), The Mass Media and Environmental Issues. Leicester University Press, Leicester.
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43, 51-58.
Fisher, J. (1993). The Road from Rio: Sustaniable Development and the Nongovernmental Movement in the Third World. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger.
Friedman, S. M., Dunwoody, S., & Rogers, C.L. (Eds). (1999). Communicating Uncertainty: Media Coverage of New and Controversial Science, (pp. 3–21). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Gamson,W.A.et al. (1992). Media images and the social construction of reality. Annual Review of Sociology, 18, 373-393.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: A essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Grop, V. (2007). The Constructionist Approach to Framing: Bringing Culture Back In. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 60-78.
Gunster, S. (2009). Environmental journalism viewed from Canada. Media Development, 56, 2, 25-28.
Hansen, A. (1991). The media and social construction of the environment. Media, Culture and Society, 13, 443-458.
Hilgartner, S., Bosk, C.L. (1990). The Rise and Fall of Social Problem: A Public Arenas Model. American Journal of Sociology, 94(1), 53-78.
Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Kerlinger, F.N. (1979). Behavioral research: A conceptual approach. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Kosicki, G. M. (1993). Problems and opportunities in agenda-setting research. Journal of Communication, 43, 100-127.
Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Kwamena, K. D. (2001). The appeal of qualitative methods to traditional agenda-setting research. Gazette, 63(6), 521-537.
Leiserowitz, A. (2005) . American Risk Perceptions: Is Climate Change Dangerous?. Risk Analysis, 25(6), 1433–42.
Lorenzoni, I., Leiserowitz, A., de Franca Doria, M., Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N. (2006) .Cross-National Comparisons of Image Associations with ‘Global Warming’ and ‘Climate Change’ among Laypeople in the United States of America and Great Britain. Journal of Risk Research, 9(3), 265–81.
Lorenzoni, I., N. Pidgeon, R. O’Connor (2005). Dangerous Climate Change: the role for risk research. Risk Analysis, 25(6), 1387-1398.
MaCommas, J. Shanahan, J., & Jessica S. Butler (2001). Environmental Content in Prime-Time Network TV’s Non-News Entertainment and Fictional Programs. Society and Natural Resources, 14, 533-542.
Major A.M., Atwood L.E.(2004). Environmental Risks in the News: Issues, Sources, Problems, and Values. Public Understanding of Science, 13, 295-308.
McCombs, M. E., Shaw, D. L. (1993). The evolution of agenda-setting research: Twenty-five years in the marketplace of ideas. Journal of Communication, 43 (2), 58-67.
Media frames: Approaches to conceptualization and measurement. Paper presented to the Communication Theory and Methodology, annual conference of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Boston, Mass.
Nelkin, D. (1995). Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology. (revised edn.). New York: W.H. Freeman & Co. Paper Presented at the Annual Conference of the Association For Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Boston, MA.
Olausson, U. (2009). Global warming—global responsibility? Media frames of collective action and scientific certainty. Public Understanding of Science, 18 (4), 421-436.
Pearce, F. (2009/02/05). Credit crunch mustn't stifle climate change action. In NewScientist. Retrieved Sep 17, 2000, from http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/shortsharpscience/2009/02/fred-pearce-senior-environment.html.
Phillips, L. & Jorgensen, M. W. (2002). Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Proctor, R.N. (1995). Cancer Wars:How Politics Shapes What We Know and Don’t Know about Cancer. New York:BasicBooks.
Reese, D. (2007). The Framing Project: A Bridging Model for Media Research Revisited. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 148-154.
Reese, S. (2001). Framing public life: A bridhing model for media research. In S. Reese, O. Gandy, and A. Grant(Eds.), Framing public life (pp. 7-31). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rosteck, T., Frentz, T.S. (2009). Myth and Multiple Readings in Environmental Rhetoric: The Case of An Inconvenient Truth.Quarterly Journal of Speech, 95(1), 1-19.
Scheufele, D. A., Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda-setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 9-20.
Schwartz, P., Randall, D. (2003/10). An Abrupt Climate Change Scenario and Its Implications for United States National Security. Retrieved Sep 17, 2000, from http://standeyo.com/Reports/pentagon_climatechange.pdf
Shanahan, J., Good J. (2000). Heat and hot air: influence of local temperature on journalists’ coverage of global warming. Public Understanding of Science, 9, 285-295.
Sheafer, T. (2007). Framing, agenda-setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 21-39.
Smithson, M. (1985). Toward a Social Theory of Ignorance. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 15,151–172.
Spoel, P., Goforth, D., Cheu, H., Pearsom, D. (2009). Public Communication of Climate Change Science: Engaging Citizens Through Apocalyptic Narrative Explanation. Public Understanding of Science, 18 (1), 49-81.
Stamm, K. Clark, F., & Eblacas, P.R. (2000). Mass communication and public understanding of environmental problems: the case of global warming. Public Understanding of Science, 9, 219-237.
Stilgoe, J. (2007). The (co-)production of public uncertainty: UK scientific advice on mobile phone health risks. Public Understanding of Science, 16, 45-61.
Stocking, S. H. (1998). On Drawing Attention to Ignorance. Science Communication, 20(1), 165–78.
Stocking, S. H. (1999) .How Journalists Deal with Scientific Uncertainty, in S. M. Friedman, S. Dunwoody and C.L. Rogers (eds), Communicating Uncertainty: Media Coverage of New and Controversial Science(pp. 23–41). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Stocking, S.H., Holstein, L.W. (2009). Manufacturing doubt: journalists’ roles and the construction of ignorance in a scientific controversy. Public Understanding of Science, 18, 23-42.
Tankard, J.W., Hendrickson, L., Silberman, J., Bliss, K., & Ghanem, S. (1991, August). Media frames: Approaches to conceptualization and measurement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Communication Theory and Methodology Division of the Assciation for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Boston, August.
Tolan, S., Berzon, A. (2005). Global Warming: What's Known vs. What's Told. Nieman Reports, 91-94.
Trumbo, C. (1996). Constructing climate change: claims and frames in U.S. news coverage of an environmental issue. Public Understanding of Science, 5 , 269–283,
Trumbo, G.W., Shanahan, J. (2000). Social research on climate change: where we have been, where we are, and where we might go. Public Understanding of Science, 9, 199-204.
Tuchman, Gaye. (1978). Making news :a study in the construction of reality. New York: Free Press.
Ungar, S. (2000). Knowledge, ignorance and the popular culture: climate change versus the ozone hole. Public Understanding of Science, 9, 297-312.
van Dijk, T. A. (1983). Discourse analysis: It’s development and application to the structure of the news. Journal of Communication, 33(2), 20-43.
Wakefield, S. E. L., & Elliott, S. J. (2003). Constructing the news: The role of local newspapers in environmental risk communication. The Professional Geographer, 55(2), 216-226.
Weaver, A. (2008). Keeping Our Cool: Canada In A Warming World. Toronto: Viking Canada.
Weber, R. P.(1990). Basic content analysis. Newbury Park, Calif. :Sage.
Weingart P, Engels A, & Pansegrau P. (2000). Risks of communication: Discourses on climate change in science, politics, and the mass media. Public Understanding of Science, 9, 261–283.
Wilkins, L. (1993).Between facts and values: print media coverage of the greenhouse effect, 1987–1990. Public Understanding of Science , 2, 71–84.
Wilson, E. (1994). The Diversity of Life. London: penguin. World commission on environment and development (WCED). (1987). Our common future. New York: oxford university press.
Wilson, K.M. (2000). Drought, debate, and uncertainty: measuring reporters’ knowledge and ignorance about climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 9, 1-13.
Wynne, B. (1987) .Uncertainty—Technical and Social. in H. Brooks and C. Cooper (Eds.). Science for Public Policy, pp. 95–115. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Wynne, B. (1992). Uncertainty and Environmental Learning—Reconceiving Science and Policy in the Preventive Paradigm. Global Environmental Change , 2(2), 111–27.
Zehr, S. (1999). Scientists’ Representations of Uncertainty, In S. Friedman, S. Dunwoody and C. Rogers (Eds.). Communicating Uncertainty: Media Coverage of New and Controversial Science, (pp. 30-52). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Zehr, S.C. (2000). Public Representations of Scientific Uncertainty about Global Climate Change. Public Understanding of Science, 9(2), 85–103.