簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳芳如
Chen Fang Ju
論文名稱: 一位資深高中數學教師實習輔導模式的個案研究
指導教授: 金鈐
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 數學系
Department of Mathematics
論文出版年: 2008
畢業學年度: 96
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 250
中文關鍵詞: 教師專業發展輔導價值實習教師實習輔導教師實習輔導模式
英文關鍵詞: mentor teacher, mentoring model of teaching, mentoring value, probationary teacher, professional development of teacher
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:145下載:14
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究以一位具有豐富實習輔導經驗的資深高中數學教師為研究對象,並以其任教學校為場景,進行為期一年的質性取向的個案研究。研究過程乃參酌Clark and Peterson (1986)的「教師思維與行動模式」,將實習輔導教師的輔導模式區分為外部的輔導活動以及內部的輔導思維。透過四階段的研究設計,運用半結構式的訪談、課堂教學觀察、填寫問卷以及各類書面文件的收集,並且參考Chin and Lin (2000)分析教師教學價值的方法學架構,運用四個層次的辯證方法來詮釋資深高中數學教師實習輔導模式的架構與內涵,並探究其與教學實務的關連以及發展教學與實習輔導相關知能的因素。

    本研究結果顯示,具有豐富輔導經驗的資深中學教師已經是一位內化的輔導者,並且建構出「膠囊化的實習輔導模式」:膠囊的外部呈現出輔導策略與行為的階段性輔導活動,內部則是輔導理念或信念交織而成的縝密輔導思維,蘊含輔導價值。研究結果並發現,有些輔導價值與個案本身的教學價值相近,有些則有些許差異。這似乎顯示,實習輔導與教學實務雖然相似卻非相同,並且輔導價值的範疇包含了教學價值。研究結果也顯示,對於具有豐富輔導經驗的資深教師而言,專業知能可以是透過參與實務而直接發展,或是經由流暢轉換雙重實務身份的反思而間接發展,所以,他們是教學與輔導的雙重內化學習者。因此,本研究的結果可以提供一些數學實習輔導的方向,作為建構輔導模式的參考,以落實師徒制的實習輔導理想。同時,也提醒實習輔導教師,應該在自己的教學與輔導實務脈絡中進行反思,以深化相關的專業知能,達到實習輔導教師與實習教師互惠成長的教育實習目標。

    This research was to describe one very experienced mathematical mentor’s model of mentoring. Case study approach was used to explore the mentor’s thoughts and activities for one academic year. Referring to ‘A model of teacher thought and activity’ developed by Clark & Peterson (1986), the mentoring model of teaching practice was divided into two domains: surface domain consists of the relevant mentoring activities, and inner domain includes the corresponding mentor’s thinking process. A 4-stages data collection including interviews and classroom observation was developed. By using Chin & Lin’s (2000) four-level dialectical method for investigating teachers’ pedagogical values, the author interpreted the structure and the content of the case teacher's mentoring model of teaching practice, its connections to classroom teaching, and the possibility of stimulating professional development.

    The research results revealed that the teacher was more like an inner mentor who had developed ‘an encapsulated model of mentoring’. Its surface represented the mentoring activities including the relevant strategies and actions, its inside was the mentoring thoughts interweaved with the professional knowledge, beliefs and values of mathematics teaching and mentoring. Some mentoring values were equivalent to his pedagogical values, others were not. It showed that mentoring practice was similar to teaching practice, but they were not the same. In addition, the professional knowledge of the teacher was probably developed from and through classroom teaching directly or indirectly informed by the process of transformation between professional identities as a teacher or a mentor. Therefore, he was an inner learner of /through both teaching and mentoring. The study results may contribute to mathematics teachers who are willing to engage in mentoring in order to learn to develop the model of both teaching and mentoring. It could also used to remind mentor teachers in developing ways of mentoring through reflecting on his or her classroom mentoring and teaching practice. As a result, both mentor teachers and probationary teachers could mutually beneficial to own professional development in mathematics teaching and mentoring.

    中文摘要 英文摘要 目次 圖目次 表目次 第一章 緒論 ………………………………………………………… 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 …………………………………………………… 1 第二節 研究問題與目的 …………………………………………………… 8 第二章 文獻探討…………………………………………………… 11 第一節 實習輔導教師的輔導模式………………………………………… 11 第二節 數學教師的專業發展……………………………………………… 28 第三節 教師專業發展的情意內涵與身份發展…………………………… 47 第四節 本研究的方法學與詮釋性架構…………………………………… 63 第三章 研究方法…………………………………………………… 67 第一節 研究場域與對象…………………………………………………… 67 第二節 質性取向的個案研究法…………………………………………… 70 第三節 研究設計…………………………………………………………… 74 第四節 資料整理與分析…………………………………………………… 83 第五節 研究限制…………………………………………………………… 87 第四章 研究結果…………………………………………………… 93 第一節 學校環境與個案背景……………………………………………… 94 第二節 觀察評估階段………………………………………………………100 第三節 因勢發展階段………………………………………………………107 第四節 運籌帷幄階段………………………………………………………121 第五節 拓展完備階段………………………………………………………176 第六節 四階段結果的統整比較與分析……………………………………193 第五章 回顧與討論…………………………………………………207 第一節 實習輔導教師的輔導思維 ……………………………………… 207 第二節 實習輔導教師的輔導模式 ……………………………………… 218 第三節 實習輔導教師的專業發展 ……………………………………… 223 第六章 結論和建議…………………………………………………233 第一節 結論與啟示…………………………………………………………233 第二節 接續研究的建議……………………………………………………236 參考文獻………………………………………………………………239 圖 目 次 圖2-1-1 教學循環 …………………………………………………………… 20 圖2-1-2 PAMR循環中的輔導功能 ………………………………………… 21 圖2-2-1 Simon的學-教六循環模型 ………………………………………… 38 圖2-2-2 Tzur的數學教育四焦點模型 ………………………………………… 40 圖2-2-3 Zaslavsky等人的數學教育者專業發展三層次模型………………… 42 圖2-3-1 正四面體模式的情意內涵 ……………………………………………48 圖2-3-2 學生的知識、實務與身份之間的關係 ………………………………59 圖2-3-3 身份如同結合心智中的自我以及社群中的自我 ……………………60 圖2-4-1 教師的思維與行動 ……………………………………………………63 圖2-4-2 探索與詮釋教師教學價值系統的架構 ………………………………65 圖2-4-3 本研究運用的方法學以及詮釋性架構 ………………………………66 圖3-4-1 M23的輔導思維多重證據收斂圖示 ………………………………… 87 圖4-1-1 (M23的教學影片擷取) ………………………………………………96 圖4-1-2 M23的PPT教學 ………………………………………………………97 圖4-1-3 M23的班級經營 ……………………………………………………… 98 圖4-2-1 (M23的教學建議單擷取) ……………………………………………103 圖4-2-2 M23於觀察評估階段的輔導活動 ……………………………………104 圖4-3-1 (A23的教學講義擷取) ………………………………………………108 圖4-3-2 (A23的教學講義擷取) ………………………………………………108 圖4-3-3 (M23的教學建議單擷取) ……………………………………………110 圖4-3-4 M23於因勢發展階段的輔導活動 ……………………………………113 圖4-3-5 M23於因勢發展階段的心態發展過程 ………………………………116 圖4-4-1 M23對於第一次教學觀摩的輔導策略 ………………………………121 圖4-4-2 (A23的教學影片擷取) ………………………………………………126 圖4-4-3 (A23的教學影片擷取) ………………………………………………126 圖4-4-4 (A23的教學影片擷取) ………………………………………………127 圖4-4-5 (M23的教學建議單擷取) ……………………………………………127 圖4-4-6 (M23的教學建議單擷取) ……………………………………………129 圖4-4-7 M23因應第二次教學觀摩的輔導策略 ………………………………132 圖4-4-8 (M23的教學影片擷取) ………………………………………………136 圖4-4-9 (M23的教學影片擷取) ………………………………………………136 圖4-4-10 (A23的教學影片擷取) ………………………………………………140 圖4-4-11 (M23的教學影片擷取) ………………………………………………141 圖4-4-12 M23對於教學觀摩的六個輔導步驟流程圖 …………………………145 圖4-4-13 M23對於教學觀摩的穩固輔導策略流程圖 …………………………147 圖4-4-14 M23對於實習教師協助學生解題的輔導作為 ………………………149 圖4-4-15 M23於運籌帷幄階段的輔導活動 ……………………………………150 圖4-4-16 (A23的教學影片擷取) ………………………………………………151 圖4-4-17 (A23的教學影片擷取) ………………………………………………151 圖4-4-18 (A23的教學影片擷取) ………………………………………………152 圖4-4-19 (A23的教學影片擷取) ………………………………………………152 圖4-4-20 (A23的教學影片擷取) ………………………………………………153 圖4-4-21 (A23的教學影片擷取) ………………………………………………154 圖4-4-22 (A23的教學影片擷取) ………………………………………………154 圖4-4-23 (A23的教學影片擷取) ………………………………………………154 圖4-4-24 M23於課堂中巡視學生的輔導作為 …………………………………156 圖4-4-25 (A23的教學影片擷取) ………………………………………………157 圖4-4-26 (A23的教學影片擷取) ………………………………………………157 圖4-4-27 (A23的教學影片擷取) ………………………………………………157 圖4-4-28 (A23的教學影片擷取) ………………………………………………157 圖4-4-29 (M23的教學建議單擷取) ……………………………………………159 圖4-4-30 (A23的教學影片擷取) ………………………………………………161 圖4-4-31 (A23的教學影片擷取) ………………………………………………161 圖4-4-32 A23的教學與M23的輔導作為流程圖 ……………………………… 170 圖4-4-33 (A23的教學影片擷取) ………………………………………………171 圖4-5-1 M23安排A23觀摩孫老師高一導師班的輔導作為 ………………… 179 圖4-5-2 M23於拓展完備階段的輔導活動 ……………………………………186 圖4-5-3 M23對於實習教師命題試卷的輔導作為歷程 ………………………189 圖4-5-4 M23對於A23教學問題的課堂介入指導方式 ……………………… 193 圖4-6-1 M23的四階段輔導活動之統整 ………………………………………194 圖4-6-2 M23於觀察評估階段的輔導作為之分析 ……………………………195 圖4-6-3 M23於因勢發展階段的輔導作為之分析 ……………………………196 圖4-6-4 M23於運籌帷幄階段的輔導作為之分析 ……………………………197 圖4-6-5 M23於拓展完備階段的輔導作為之分析 ……………………………198 圖4-6-6 M23對於實際課堂教學面向的輔導作為之分析 ……………………199 圖4-6-7 M23對於教學觀摩的輔導流程圖 ……………………………………200 圖4-6-8 M23對於單元教學的輔導流程圖 ……………………………………201 圖4-6-9 M23對於A23教學問題的指導方式 ………………………………… 202 圖4-6-10 M23對於解題教學的輔導作為之分析 ………………………………202 圖4-6-11 M23對於觀摩數學教師教學面向的輔導作為之分析 ………………204 圖4-6-12 M23對於試卷命題與批閱工作面向的輔導作為之分析 ……………204 圖5-1-1 M23的輔導價值與教學價值 …………………………………………218 圖5-2-1 M23與Furlong & Maynard (1995)的階段輔導之對應關係 …………221 圖5-2-2 M23的膠囊化輔導模式 ………………………………………………222 圖5-3-1 具有豐富輔導經驗的資深數學教師之專業知能發展路徑圖示…… 232 表 目 次 表2-1-1 實習教師的發展與輔導階段(Furlong & Maynard) …………………… 16 表2-1-2 實習教師的發展與輔導階段(Tomlinson)……………………………… 22 表2-2-1 教師反思的過渡………………………………………………………… 46 表4-1-1 M23指導A*23編講義的歷程……………………………………………99 表4-3-1 M23於因勢發展階段的單元教學輔導策略……………………………112 表4-4-1 A23觀摩M23的教學重點………………………………………………124 表4-4-2 M23的教學建議內容分類表……………………………………………130 表4-4-3 A23的教學轉變情形……………………………………………………130 表4-4-4 兩次教學觀摩的輔導步驟之比較 …………………………………… 143 表4-4-5 兩次教學觀摩的輔導策略之比較 …………………………………… 146 表4-4-6 A23對於第一次教學觀摩單元的教學步調轉變情形…………………163 表4-5-1 M23於拓展完備階段對於單元教學的輔導作為考量因素……………183 表4-6-1 M23對於A23與A*23的輔導作為差異…………………………………206

    一、 中文部分

    王秋絨(1991)。教師專業社會化理論在教育實習設計上的蘊義(再版)。台北市:師大書苑。
    行政院教育改革審議委員會(1996)。行政院教育改革審議委員會第四期諮議報告書。台北市:行政院。
    朱苑瑜(2000)。國中實習教師之教師信念改變與其影響因素之關係。國立中山大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
    李沁芬(1992)。輔導教師生涯發展及生涯重心之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,台北市。
    李倩鈺(2002)。教學實習中實習輔導教師與實習教師師徒關係之探討。國立台東師範學院教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台東市。
    李源順、林福來(2003)。實習教師的學習:動機、身份與反思互動下的成長。科學教育學刊,11(1),1-25。
    呂玉琴(2000)。一個國小教師在數學教學中呈現的價值。科學教育學刊,8(1),57-76。
    何福田、羅瑞玉(1992)。教育改革與教師專業化。載於中華民國師範教育學會(主編),教育專業(1-30頁)。台北市:師大書苑。
    余錦漳(2001)。國民小學組織學習與教師專業成長之相關因素研究。國立高雄師範大學成人教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
    林芳綺(2007)。六位數學實習教師教學身分內涵及發展的個案研究。國立台灣師範大學數學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
    林碧珍、蔡文煥(2007)。小學數學領域輔導教師培訓課程期實施成效。科學教育學刊,15(5),521-542。
    林懿德(2001)。國小實習輔導教師輔導策略與實習教師專業發展之研究。國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
    金鈐(2008)。中學數學教師後設認知專業發展指標之研究(2/3)。行政院國家科學委員會專案研究報告(編號:NSC 95-2522-S-003-010)。台北市:國立台灣師範大學。
    周淑卿(2006)。反思實踐者應有的學習經驗-兼論教學實習課程的問題。載於中華民國師範教育學會(主編),新世紀師資培育的圖像(175-191頁)。台北市:心理出版社。
    柯明月(2001)。實習輔導教師經驗談。國教輔導,41(2),35-38。
    洪玉燕(2001)。我國國民小學現行實習教師制度之研究。國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東市。
    洪志成(1997)。實習教師的專業成長需求:新制輔導教師支持性角色之反省。論文發表於國立台東師範學院初等教育系主辦之「八十五學年度偏遠地區教育實習的困境與展望學術研討會」,台東市。
    高志雄(2006)。成人學習原則應用在輔導實習教師歷程之途徑與策略。載於中華民國師範教育學會(主編),新世紀師資培育的圖像(227-254頁)。台北市:心理出版社。
    高強華(1996)。師資培育問題研究。台北市:師大書苑。
    徐郁惠(2006)。八位學生數學教師教學價值認同與認知的個案研究。國立台灣師範大學數學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
    孫志麟(2006)。行動的呼喚:實習輔導教師的培育。國立台北教育大學學報,19(2),83-110。
    郭勝平(2003)。高職工業類科學校教育實習輔導教師教學輔導方式與實習教師教學效能之研究。國立台灣師範大學工業教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
    郭諭陵(2006)。從實習教師的社會化談師資素質的提升。載於中華民國師範教育學會(主編),新世紀師資培育的圖像(193-225頁)。台北市:心理出版社。
    教育部(1995)。師資培育法。台北市:教育部。
    教育部(1995)。師資培育法施行細則。台北市:教育部。
    教育部(1995)。高級中等以下學校及幼稚園教師資格檢定及教育實習辦法。台北市:教育部。
    教育部(1999)。教育基本法。台北市:教育部。
    教育部(2008)。試辦中小學教師專業發展評鑑之評鑑規準(參考版)。教育部之教研會「試辦中小學教師專業發展評鑑」子網站,2008年4月1日,取自http://140.111.34.34/moe/index.php
    許秀玲(2007)。六位數學實習教師教學知識變遷的個案研究。國立台灣師範大學數學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
    許秀聰(2004)。一位資深高中數學教師重構教學概念的行動研究。國立台灣師範大學數學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
    許美惠(2006)。數學老師也能是環教先鋒。台灣綠色學校伙伴網路,2006年7月14日,取自http://www.greenschool.org.tw/node/11125
    張春興(2006)。張氏心理學辭典(重訂版)。台北市:東華。
    張德銳(1996)。美國良師制度實習輔導制度之啟示。初等教育學刊,5,41-46。
    張繼元(2005)。六位學生數學教師教學價值認同的個案研究。國立台灣師範大學數學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
    陳利玲(2001)。國民小學實習輔導教師制度之研究。國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東市。
    陳美玉(1999)。教師專業學習與發展。台北市:師大書苑。
    黃芳裕(2001)。追求自我實現-教育實習的實現。載於國立台灣師範大學實習輔導處實習輔導組(主編),新世紀實習輔導論文集(329-340頁)。台北市:國立台灣師範大學。
    黃炳煌(1981)。師範院校教育實習之探討。台灣教育,372,7-18。
    黃淑玲(1997)。實習輔導教師制度之探討。研習資訊,14(2),86-96。
    黃婉萍(1999)。新制實習輔導制度國小實習輔導教師角色與實習教師專業發展之探討。國立花蓮師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,花蓮市。
    黃凱旻、金鈐(2003)。一個輔導中學數學實習教師教學概念轉變的行動研究。國立台灣師範大學學報:科學教育類,48(1),21-44。
    黃嘉雄(1997)。從Metor論實習輔導教師之角色。國民教育,37(4),23-27。
    葉明政(1997)。教育實習學校如何落實新教育實習制度。國民教育,37(4),19-22。
    蔣秉芳(2004)。一位好的國中實習輔導教師實習輔導的思考歷程。國立彰化師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,彰化市。
    歐用生(1996)。教師及師資培育者。研習資訊,13(6),10-16。
    謝寶梅(1997)。教育實習的基本認識。載於賴清標(主編),教育實習(1-39頁)。台中市:五南。
    鍾任琴(1994)。國小實習教師教育專業信念發展之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
    魏建忠(2001)。綜合高中教師專業成長與學校效能關係之研究。國立彰化師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,彰化市。
    顏慶祥(1999)。當前實習輔導教師的角色、困境與展望。教育實習輔導季刊,4(3),34-42。
    顏慶祥(2000)。我國中學實習輔導教師專業成長之個案研究。教育研究資訊,8(1),98-119。
    饒見維(1996)。教師專業發展-理論與實際。台北市:五南。
    Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen S. K. (1998). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and method (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn, & Bacon. [黃光雄主譯(2003)。質性教育研究理論與方法。嘉義市:濤石文化。]
    Flick, Uwe (2002): Qualitative sozialforschung. Eine Einführung, Reinbek bei Hamburg. [李政賢、廖志恆、林靜如合譯(2007)。質性研究導論。台北市:五南。]
    Maxwell, J. A. (1996). Qualitative research design:An interactive approach. London: Sage. [高熏芳、林盈助、王向葵合譯(2001)。質化研究設計:一種互動取向的方法。台北市:心理出版社。]
    Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA:Sage. [吳芝儀、李奉儒合譯(1995)。質的評鑑與研究。台北市:桂冠。]
    Robert, K. Y. (1994). Case study research design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage. [尚榮安譯(2001)。個案研究法。台北市:弘智文化。]
    Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basis of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage. [吳芝儀、廖梅花合譯(2003)。質性研究入門:紮根理論研究方法。嘉義市:濤石文化。]

    二、 英文部分

    Artzt, A., & Thomas, E. (1999). A cognitive model for examining teachers’ instructional practice in mathematics: A guide for facilitating teacher reflection. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 40, 211-235.
    Aspin, D. N. (2000). Values, beliefs and attitudes in education:The nature of values and their place and promotion in schools. In M. Leicester, C. Modgil, & S. Modgil (Eds.), Education, culture and values (pp. 130-143). London: Falmer Press.
    Bishop, A. J. (2001). Educating student teachers about values in mathematics education. In F. L. Lin, & T. J. Cooney (Eds.), Making sense of mathematics teacher education (pp. 233-244). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    Bishop, A. J., Seah, W. T., & Chin. C. (2003). Value in mathematics teaching-the hidden persuaders? In A. J. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K. S. Leong (Eds.), Second international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 717-765). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    Bleakley, A. (1999). From reflective practice to holistic reflexivity. Studies in Higher Education, 24(3), 315-330.
    Boaler, J. (1999). Participation, knowledge and beliefs: A community perspective on mathematics learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 40, 259-281.
    Boaler, J. (2002). The development of disciplinary relationships: Knowledge, practice and tdentity in mathematics classrooms. For the Learning of Mathematics, 22(1), 42-47.
    Bohl, J. V., & Zoest, L. R. V. (2002). Learning through identity: A new unit of analysis for studying teacher development. In A. D. Cockburn, & E. Nardi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Conference of the International group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2 (pp. 137-144). Norwich: the University of East Anglia.
    Borasi, R., & Fonzi, J. (2002). Professional development that supports school mathematics reform. Foundations series of monographs for professionals in science, mathematics and technology education. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
    Brown, C. A., & Borko, H. (1992). Becoming a mathematics teacher. In A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 209-239). New York: Macmillan.
    Brown, S., Cooney, T., & Jones, D. (1990). Mathematics teacher education. In W. R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (1st ed.) (pp. 469-497). New York: Macmillan.
    Bullough, R. V., Jr. (2005). The Quest for identity in teaching and teacher education. In G. F. Hoban (Ed.), The Missing links in teacher education design (pp. 237-258). The Netherlands: Springer.
    Bulter, J. (1996). Professional development: Practice as text, reflection as process, and self locus. Australian Journal of Education, 40(3), 265-283.
    Burden, P. R. (1990). Teacher development. In W. R. Houston, M. Haberman, & J. Sikula (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 311-328). New York: Macmillan.
    Calderhead, J. (1996). Teachers: Beliefs and knowledge. In B. C. Berliner, & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology (pp. 709-725). New York: Macmillan.
    Calderhead, J., & Gates, P. (1993). Introduce. In J. Calderhead, & P. Gates (Eds.), Conceptual Reflection in Teacher Development (pp. 1-10). London: The Flamer Press.
    Chapman, O. (2002). Belief structure and inservice high school mathematics teacher growth. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Torner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 177-193). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    Chin, C., & Lin, F. L. (1999). One mathematics teacher’s pedagogical values: Intended, implemented, and self phases. In F. L. Lin (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1999 International Conference on Mathematics Teacher Education (pp. 315-325). Taipei, Taiwan: National Taiwan Normal University.
    Chin, C., & Lin, F. L. (2000). A case study of mathematics teacher’s pedagogical values: Use a methodological framework of interpretation and reflection. Proceedings of National Science Council Part D: Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education, 10(2), 90-101.
    Chin, C., & Lin, F. L. (2001). Mathematics teacher’s pedagogical value clarification and its relationship to classroom teaching. Proceedings of National Science Council Part D: Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education, 11(3), 114-125.
    Chin, C., Leu Y. C., & Lin, F. L. (2001). Pedagogical values, mathematics teaching and teacher education: Case studies of two experienced teachers. In F. L. Lin, & T. J. Cooney (Eds.), Making sense of mathematics teacher education (pp. 247-269). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    Christensen, D. (1996). The professional knowledge-research base for teacher education. In W. R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed.) (pp. 38-52). New York: Macmillan.
    Clark, C. M., & Peterson, P. L. (1986). Teachers thought processes. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.) (pp. 255-296). New York: Macmillan.
    Clarkson, P. C., & Bishop, A. J. (1999). Values and mathematics education. Paper presented at 51st Conference of the International Commission for the Study and Improvement of Mathematics Education, University College, Chichester, UK.
    Cooney, T. J. (1994). Teacher education as an exercise in adaptation. In D. B. Aichele, & A. F. Coxford (Eds.), Professional development for teachers of mathematics: 1994 yearbook (pp. 9-22). Reston, VA: NCTM.
    Cooney, T. J. (2001). Considering the paradoxes, perils, and purposes of conceptualizing teacher development. In F. L. Lin, & T. J. Cooney (Eds.), Making sense of mathematics teacher education (pp. 9-31). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    Cooney, T. J., & Wiegel, H. G. (2003). Examining the mathematics in mathematics teacher education. In A. J. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K.S. Leung (Eds.), Second international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 795-828). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    Corcoran, E. (1981). Transition shock: The beginning teacher’s paradox. Journal of Teacher Education, 32, 19-23.
    Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Debellis, V., & Goldin, G. (2006). Affect and meta-affect in mathematical problem solving: A representational perspective. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63, 131-147.
    Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Lexington, MA: D. C. Health.
    Ernest, P. (1985). The philosophy of mathematics and mathematics education. International Journal of Science and Technology, 16(5), 603-612.
    Ernest, P. (1989). The knowledge, beliefs and attitudes of the mathematics teacher: A model. Journal of Education for Teaching, 15(1), 13-33.
    Even, R. (1999). Integrating academic and practical knowledge in a teacher leaders’ development program. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 38(3), 235-252.
    Fish, D. (1995). Quality mentoring for student teachers: A principled approach to practice. London: David Fulton Publishers.
    Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
    Frost, D. (1993). Reflective mentoring and the new partnership, In D. McIntyre, H. Hagger, & M. Wilkin (Eds.), Mentoring: Perspectives on school-based teacher education (pp. 130-145). London: Kogan Page.
    Furlong, J., & Maynard, T. (1995). Mentoring student teachers: The growth of professional knowledge. London: Routledge.
    Ghaye A., & Ghaye, K. (1998). Teaching and learning through critical reflective practice. London : David Fulton Publishers.
    Goldin, G. A. (2002). Affect, meta-affect, and mathematical belief structures. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Torner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 89-71). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
    Gratch, A. (1998). Beginning teacher and mentor relationships. Journal of Teacher Education, 49(3), 220-227.
    Green, T. (1971). The activities of teaching. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Gudmundsdöttir, S. (1990). Values in pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 44-52.
    Guskey, T. R. (1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change. Educational Researcher, 15(5), 5-12.
    Hager, P. (1996). Professional practice in education: Research and issues. Australian Journal of Education, 40(3), 235-247.
    Hansen, (2001). In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed.) (pp. 826-857). Washington, D. C. : AERA
    Harre, R., & van Langenhove, L. (Eds.). (1999). Positioning theory. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
    Hersh, R. (1986). Some proposals for revising the philosophy of mathematics. In T. Tymoczko (Ed.), New directions in the philosophy of mathematics (pp. 9-28). Boston:Birkhävser.
    Jaworski, B. (2001). Development mathematics teaching: Teachers, teacher educators, and researchers as co-leaners. In F. L. Lin, & T. J. Cooney (Eds.), Making sense of mathematics teacher education (pp. 295-230). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    Johnston, D. K., Duvernoy, R., McGill, P., & Will, J. F. (1996). Educating teachers together: Teachers as learners, talkers, and collaborators. Theory into Practice, 35(3), 173-178.
    Jonson, K. F. (2002). Being an effective mentor. : How to help beginning teachers succeed. California : Corwin Press.
    Kaplan, R. G. (1991). Teacher beliefs and practices: A square peg in a square hole. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Blacksburg, VA.
    Karplus, R., Lawson, A., Wollman, W., Apple, M., Bernoff, R., Howe, A., Rusch, J., & Sullivan, F. (1977). Science Teaching and the Development of Reasoning. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
    LaBoskey, V. K. (1993). A conceptual framework for reflection in preservice teacher education. In J. Calderhead, & P. Gates (Eds.), Conceptualizing reflection in teacher development (pp. 23-38). London: The Falmer Press.
    Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning - legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Leatham, K. R. (2006). Viewing mathematics teachers’ beliefs as sensible systems. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 91-102.
    Leinhardt, G. (1988). Expertise in instructional lessons: An example from factions. In D. Grouws, T. Cooney, & D. Jones (Eds.), Perspectives on research on effective mathematics teaching (pp. 47-66). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
    Lerman, S. (1994). Reflective practice. In B. Jaworski, & A. Watson (Eds.), Mentoring in mathematics teaching (pp. 52-64). London: The Falmer Press.
    Lloyd, G. (1999). Two teachers’ conceptions of a reform-oriented curriculum: Implications for mathematics teacher development. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 2, 227-252.
    Marcia, J. (1980). Identity in adolescence. In J. Adelson (Ed.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 159-187). New York: Wiley.
    Maynard, T., & Furlong, J. (1993). Learning to teach and models of mentoring. In D. McIntyre, H. Hagger, & M. Wilkin (Eds.), Mentoring: perspectives on school-based teacher education (pp. 69-85). London, Philadelphia: Kogan Page.
    McIntyre, D., & Hagger, H. (1993). Teachers’ expertise and models of mentoring. In D. McIntyre, H. Hagger, & M. Wilkin (Eds.), Mentoring: perspectives on school-based teacher education (pp. 86-102). London, Philadelphia: Kogan Page.
    McLeod, D. B. (1988). Affective issures in mathematical problem solving: Some theoretical considerations. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19, 134-141.
    McLeod, D. B. (1992). Research on affect in mathematics education: A reconceptualization. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 575-596). New York: Macmillan.
    Minnick, J. H. (1939). Teaching Mathematics in the Secondary Schools. New York: Prentice-Hall.
    Moir, E. (2005). Launching the next generation of teachers: The new teacher center’s model for quality induction and mentoring. In H. Portner (Ed.), Teacher mentoring and induction: The state of the art and beyond (pp. 59-73). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
    Monk, M., & Dillon, J. (1995). Learning to teach science : Activities for student teachers and mentors. London : The Falmer Press.
    Nettle, E. B. (1998). Stability and change in the beliefs of student teachers during practice teaching. Teaching & teacher education, 14(2), 193-204.
    Noddings, N. (1992). Professionalization and mathematics teaching. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 209-239). New York: Macmillan.
    Noddings, N. (1998). Philosophy of education. Oxford: Westview Press.
    Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ belief and educational research:Cleaning up a messy construct . Review of Educational Research , 62(3), 307-332.
    Philipp, R. A. (2007). Mathematics teachers’ beliefs and affect. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 257-315). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
    Piaget, J. (1970). Genetic epistemology (E. Duckworth, Trans.). NY: Columbia University.
    Pollard, A. (2002). Reflective teaching-effective and evidence-informed professional practice. NY: London.
    Raths, L. E., Harmin, M., & Simon, S. B. (1987). Selections from ‘values and teaching’. In J. P. F. Carbone (Ed.), Value theory and education (pp. 198-214). Malabar, FL: Robert E. Krieger.
    Raymond, A. M. (1997). Inconsistency between a beginning elementary school teacher’s mathematics beliefs and teaching practice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 550-576.
    Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitude and beliefs in learning to teach. In W. R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed.) (pp. 102-119). New York: Macmillan.
    Rodgers, C. R., & Scott, K. H. (2008). The development of the personal self and professional identity in learning to teach. In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman- Nemser, D. McIntyre, & K. Demers (Eds.). Handbook of research on teacher education : Enduring Questions in changing contexts (3rd ed.) (pp. 732-755) Philadelphia: Taylor and Francis, Publishers.
    Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: The Free Press.
    Rokeach, M. (1980). Beliefs, attitudes and values. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
    Ryle, G. (1949). The Concept of Mind. New York: Barnes and Noble.
    Sandelowski, M. (1995). Aesthetics of qualitative research. Image, 27, 205-209.
    Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. London: Temple Smith.
    Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
    Schramm, W. (1971). Notes on case studies of instructional media projects. Working paper, the Academy for Educational Development, Washington, DC.
    Sellick, D. (1996). Learning to use the mirrow: Reflection and teacher education. Education Today, 46 (4), 11-16
    Sfard, A., & Prusak, A. (2005). Telling identities: In search of an analytic tool for investigating learning as a culturally shaped activity. Educational Researcher, 34(4), 14-22.
    Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Research, 15(2), 4-14.
    Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-23.
    Simon, M. A. (1994). Learning mathematics and learning to teach: Learning cycles in mathematics teacher education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26, 71-94.
    Skott, J. (2001).The emerging practices of a novice teacher: The roles of his school mathematics images. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 4(1), 3-28.
    Smith, K. E. (1997). Student teachers’ beliefs about developmentally appropriate practice: Pattern, stability, and the influence of locus of control. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 12(2), 221-243.
    Sowder, J. (2007). The mathematical education and development of teachers. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 157-223). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
    Speer, N. M. (2005). Issues of methods and theory in the study of mathematics teachers’ professed and attributed beliefs. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58(2), 361-391.
    Thompson, A. G. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 127-146). New York: Macmillan.
    Tirosh, D., & Graeber, A. O. (2003). Challenging and Changing Mathematics Teaching Classroom Practices. In A. J. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), Second international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 643-687). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    Tomlinson, P. (1995). Understanding mentoring: reflective strategies for school-based teacher preparation. London: Open University Press.
    Tzur, R. (2001). Becoming a mathematics teacher-educator: Conceptualizing the terrain through self-reflective analysis. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 4, 259-283.
    Yeomans, R., & Sampson, J. (1994). Mentorship in the primary school. London: The Falmer Press.
    Zaslavsky, O., Chapman, O., & Leikin, R. (2003). Professional development of mathematics educators: Trends and tasks. In A. J. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), Second international handbook of Mathematics Education (pp. 877-917). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    Zeichner, K. M. (1994). Conceptions of reflective practice in teaching and teacher education. In G. Harvard, & P. Hodkinson (Eds.), Action and reflection in teacher education (pp. 15-34). New Jersey: Ablex.
    Zeichner, K. M., & Liston, D. P. (1996). Reflective teaching: An introduction. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Von Glasersfeld, E. (1993). Question and answers about radical constructivism. In Kenneth Tobin (Ed). The practice of constructivism in science education. Washington:AAAS press.
    Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher Psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice - learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Williams, R. M., & Albert, E. M. (1968). Values. In L. S. David, (Ed.), International encyclopdeia of the social sciences (pp. 283-291). NY: Macmillam.
    Wilson, M., & Cooney, T. (2002). Mathematics teacher change and development. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Torner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 127-147). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    Wilson, T. P. (1982). Quantitative ‘order’ qualitative Methoden in der Sozialforschung. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 34, 487-508.

    QR CODE