中文摘要

教育從人類文明開始就是即為重要的課題，尤其在進入全球化的今天，教育的效果-無論大或小-對國家的競爭力及國民的素質的影響已經不能用2、30前的過去模式來思考，網際網路跳躍式的發展與進步，例如Google、YouTube、Wikipedia等等都代表人類知識的擴大或許可以跟宇宙的無限膨脹相比擬。因此21世紀的教育不僅是知識的傳授，更要有效的教導學生具有學習知識的能力。而這個能力從認知到實現有無限的學習可能，或許在知識的大爆炸的新時代讓我們的下一代能更具有生存競爭力甚至更加成功。本研究乃運用從70年代開始風行的「後設認知」理論，來探討九年一貫課程中的「自然與生活科技領域」國民中學理化教師的實際教學情形，希望由本研究的分析結論為「後設認知」教學在臺灣教育舞台上更被重視或扮演更重要的角色，進而使臺灣學子的未來世界競爭力提升一點點，都可能是教育成敗的關鍵。

Abstract
From the beginning of human civilization education has been an important issue. Especially stepping into to the new era of globalization, the effect of education toward the competitiveness of a nation or the quality of citizens, whether big or small, cannot be considered like in the past. Internet is growing in leaps and bounds. Like Google, YouTube or Wikipedia, their growth as representing the expanding of human knowledge can only be compared by the expansion of our universe. Therefore the education in 21st century does not only teach knowledge but also teach students how to possess the ability to learn knowledge. This ability starts from cognition to acquirement of knowledge and further to learning beyond boundaries. With this ability perhaps, during the new era of knowledge explosion, our next generation will survive, compete or even succeed. Utilizing the concept and successful experimental results of metacognition since 1970s we will explore the real situations of chemistry and physics teachers teaching the 「Natural Science and life technology Domain」of 「Grade 1-9 Curriculum」in junior high schools. It is expected that from the analyzed results of this research, whether metacognition can be emphasized and play a more important role in the arena of Taiwan’s education. Evidently any slight increase of competitiveness in future world is a win-or-lose situation of Education in Taiwan.

參考文獻
楊宗仁(民80):後設認知的源起及其理論，資優教育季刊，第38期，頁16~25

于富雲、陳玉欣（民95）。不同知識表徵建構的學習策略對自然科學習成效之影響，科學教育學刊，第15卷，第1期，頁1-20

江新合 (民83)：國中理化科教師的教學行為與其信念體系之相關研究。國科會研究計畫：NSC83-0111-S017-012。

李佳錦 (民83)：國中理化教師的教學信念研究。國立高雄師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文。

李蓉欣 (民92)：中學地球科學教師教學後設認知能力與個人知識認識信念之相關研究。國立臺灣師範大學地球科學研究所碩士論文。

林志忠 (民88)：後設認知策略對資優兒童科學解題能力影響之研究。師大學報：科學教育類，44期，61-81頁。

吳宏達 (民93)：概念圖在國中自然與生活科技學習的應用。中等教育期刊。

吳明清 (民91)：教育研究－基本觀念與方法分析。台北：五南。

周春美、沈健華 (民 93)：後設認知取向教學活動對教育學程學生教學專業化之研究。課程與教學季刊，7(4)，43-51頁。

洪儷瑜 (民84)：學習障礙學生的教育與輔導。載於張蓓莉、廖永、董媛卿編，如何發現及協助特殊學生（第三版），頁90-99。

洪儷瑜(民84)：學習障礙在各國的實施。認知神經心理簡訊，1(4),29-30。

柯志恩 (民 93)：融合後設認知之創造思考教學方案在師資培育課程之應用。新竹師院學報。

柯志恩 (民 93)：由後設認知技能實踐觀點看教師課程統整知能的發展。教育資料與研究。

陳怡如 (民93)：線上後設認知教學對不同英語程度學生學習閱讀或寫作之影響。東吳外語學報，19冊，57-88頁。

胡永崇 (民 90)：後設認知理論及其在學習障礙學生之教學應用。載於國立屏東師範學院特殊教育中心主編：特殊教育文集(三)(243-276頁)。屏東，臺灣：國立屏東師範學院特殊教育中心。

郭秀緞 (民92)：後設認知的理論與其在教學上的應用。教學研究(高師大)。

郭靜姿（民79）：學習動機、策略運用與後設認知能力之相關探討及所建構而成之後設認知理解模式在資優生教學上的運用（上）。資優教育季刊，37期，1-8。

楊明家（民86）：國小六年級不同解題能力學生在數學解題歷程後設認知行為
之比較研究。屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文（未出版）。

曾一平 & 張惠博 (民88)：理化實習教師教學計畫的認知與其思考歷程之研究。科學教育第十期。

蔡保田（民76）。調查研究法在教育上的應用。載於中國教育學會主編：教育研究方法論，台北：師大書苑。

張昇鵬 (民84)：資賦優異學生創造思考能力與後設認知能力相關之研究。特殊教育研究學刊，民84.12，13期，頁221-240。

張昇鵬 (民92)：資賦優異學生與普通學生後設認知能力與創造思考能力之比較研究。特殊教育學報，民93，17期，頁95-120。

張昇鵬 (民93)：資賦優異學生與普通學生後設認知能力與批判思考能力之比較研究。特殊教育學報，民93，20期，頁57-102。

蔡文榮 (民92)：師資培育的另類教學取向:三重省思的挑戰。科學教育期刊。

謝惠德 (民84) ：反省與教學：一位高級中學化學教師信念的詮釋性研究。國立高雄師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文。

Adams,P.E. & Krockover,G.H. (1997). Beginning science teacher cognition and its origins in the preservice secondary science teacher program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(6),633-653.

Anderson, N.J. (2002). The role of metacognition in second language teaching and learning. ERIC Digest, EDO-FL-01-10.

Baker, L., & Brown , A, L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In P. David Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research. New York：Longman

Borkowski, J. G., Estrada, M. T., Milstead M. and Hale C. A.(1989). General Problem-Solving Skills: Relations between Metacognition and Strategic Processing. Learning Disability Quarterly, Vol. 12, No. 1, Learning Strategy Instruction, pp. 57-70.

Bransford, J., Darling-Hammond, L., & LePage, P. (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, selfregulation and other more mysterious mechanisms. In Franz E. Weinert : Rainer H. Kluwe(Eds), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Chan, Lorna K. S. (1996). Motivational Orientations and Metacognitive Abilities of Intellectually Gifted Students. Gifted Child Quarterly, Vol. 40, No. 4, 184-193

Darling-Hammond, L. and Baratz-Snowden, J. (Eds).(2005). A Good Teacher in Every Classroom: Preparing the Highly Qualified Teachers Our Children Deserve. San Francisco,CA: Jossey-Bass.

Desoete, A., Roeyers, H, and Buysse, A. (2001). Metacognition and mathematical problem solving in grade 3. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34 (4), pp. 435-49

Dewey J. (1933) How We Think: a restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process (Boston, D.C. Heath).

Lin, X., Schwartz, D.L., & Hatano, G. (2005). Toward Teachers’ Adaptive Metacognition. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), pp.245-255.

Meichenbaum, D., Burland. S.,Gruson, L., & Cameron, R. (1985) Metacognitive assessment. In Steven R. Yussen, The growth of reflection in children. New York: Academic Press.

Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive Aspects of problem solving. In Resnick L.B. (Ed), The nature of intelligence. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Flavell, J. H., & Wellman, H. M. (1977). Metamemory. In Robert V. Kail, Jr., & John W. Hagen (Eds.). Perspectives on the development of memory and cognition. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Flavell, J. H. (1981). Cognitive Monitoring. In W. Patrick Dickson, Children’s oral communication skills. New York: Academic Press.

Flavell, J. H. (1987). Speculations about the nature and development of metacognition. In Franz E. Weinert, & Rainer H. Kluwe, Metacognition, motivation, and understanding. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Greene, Maxine. (1986). Philosophy and teaching. Merlin C. Wittrock(Ed.),
Handbook for research on teaching(pp. 479-501). New York: Macmillan.

Hatton, Neville, Smith & David (1994). Facilitating reflection ; Issues and Research.
Conference of the asutralian teacher education association. ( ERIC Document
Reproduction Service NO. ED375110).

Hatton, N., & Smith, D. (1995). Reflection in Teacher Education: Towards Definition and Implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(1), 33-49

Jay, J. K. (1999, February). Untying the knots: Examining the complexities of
reflective practice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American
Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, Washington, DC. ( ERIC
Document Reproduction Service NO. ED431732).

Killion, J. P., & Todnem, G. R. (1991). A process for personal theory building.
Educational Leadship, 48(6), 14-16.

Myers, M., & Paris, S. G. (1978). Children’s metacognitive Knowledge about reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 680-690.

Nunan, D., & Lamb, C. (1996). The self-directed teacher: Managing the learning process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,120.

Osborn, R. J., & Gilbert, J.K. (1980). A technique for exploring student’s views of the world. Physics Education,15,376-379.

Paris, S, G., Cross D. R., & Lipson, M. Y. (1984). Informed strategies for learning: A Program to improve ciidren’s reading awareness and comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(6), 1239-1252

Paris, S. G., & Lindauer, B. K. (1982) The development of cognitive skills during childhood. In B. Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of developmental psychology(pp.333-349)

Pennington, M. (1992). Reflecting on teaching and learning: A development focus for the second language classroom. In Perspectives on Second Language Classroom Teacher Education. eds. J. Flowerdew, M. Brock, and S. Hsia. Kowloon: City Polythenic of Hong Kong.

Pressley, M., Brokowski, J. G., & O’Sullivan, J. (1985) Children’s metamemory and the teaching of memory strategies. In D. L. Forrest-Pressley, G. E. Mackinnon, T. G. Wallen (Eds), Metacognition, cognition, and human performance. London:Academic Press.

Pressley, M. (2002). Metacognition and Self-Regulated Comprehension. In A.E. Farstrup, & S. Samuels (Eds.), What Research Has to Say About Reading Instruction (pp. 291-309). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

Richards, J. (1990). Beyond training: Approaches to teacher education in language teaching. Language Teacher, 14, 2, pp. 3-8.

Richards, J. C., & Lockhart, C. (1994). Reflective teaching in second language classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Pres,1-4.

Sanford, J. P. (1988). Learning on the job: Conditions for professional. development of beginning science teachers. Science Education, 72(5), 615-624.

Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for
teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Schoenfeld, A.H. (1987). What’s all the fuss about metacognition? In A.H. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Cognitive science and mathematics education (pp.189-215). Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness.
Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460.

Stanley, C. (1998). A framework for teacher reflectivity. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 584-591.

Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Sternberg, R. J. (1986). Intelligence Applied：Understanding and increasing your intellectual skills. Orlando, Florida：Harcourt Brace Joranvich.

Verschaffel.L., Op t Eynde, P., and De Corte, E. (2002). Knowing what to believe: the relevance of students' mathematical beliefs for mathematics education. In B. IC Hofer, P. R. Pintrich (Eds.) Personal epistemology: the psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing . (pp 297-320). Mahwah, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum.

Wallace, M. J. (1991). Training foreign language teachers: A reflective approach (p. 49). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Watts, D.M. (1981). Exploring pupils： alternative frameworks using the interview-about-instance method. (ERIC Document Reprodution Service No. ED 231-849).

White, R. T. (1988). Metacognition. In Keeves John P., Educational research, methodology, and measurement (p70-5). Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Yang, F.Y. (2004). Exploring the personal epistemology of Taiwan seconday earth science teachers. Paper presented in the annual meeting of National Association of Research in Science Teaching.

Zeichner, K.M. & Liston, D.P. (1996). Reflective teaching: An introduction. Mahwah, NJ:Lawarence Erlbum.