李開復博士2017年底提出虛實融合OMO（Online-Merge-Offline）未來趨勢，在零售產業開啟線上線下流量循環及融合新體系；企業面對疫情衝擊和市場生存競爭，不斷積極尋求創新發展和各種快速有效的解決方案；新興科技興起和政府政策也正積極推動提升中小企業數位應用能力計劃。另根據經濟部中小企業處彙編《2022中小企業白皮書》，2021年臺灣中小企業家數已佔全體企業98%以上，就業人數也占全國就業人數的80%以上；因此強化中小企業數位能力和導入數位營運管理確有其必要性。

針對中小型企業，採用以分享經濟創新概念所建構的「SI全方位智慧鑒診系統」數位營運平台（以下簡稱SI 數位營運平台）為研究標的，以技術商業化和新商品角度，來探討中小企業採用SI數位營運平台之態度和意願研究。先以問卷調查法對34位採用或有意願了解數位平台者（不限於SI 數位營運平台），進行相關背景了解；接續以六位正在使用SI 數位營運平台之中小企業企業主做為訪談對象進行深度訪談，透過跨產業使用經驗和不同特質受訪者觀點，竭盡所能蒐集到與研究目的相關有價值具代表性的研究資料。

將訪談內容透過紮根理論研究方法抽絲剝繭深入探討，萃取提煉出企業對SI 數位營運平台的使用態度和使用意願、採用因素，以及採用的整體效益和建議。最後發現並歸納出四點結論：(1)企業採用「SI全方位智慧鑒診系統」數位營運平台的十二項影響因素分類，(2)企業採用「SI全方位智慧鑒診系統」數位營運平台能建構完整的產業生態系，(3)企業採用「SI全方位智慧鑒診系統」數位營運平台，透過授權發展生態鏈系統、產業聯盟或廠商聯盟，(4)依「認知有用」和「認知易用」性質區分，提鍊出企業採用「SI全方位智慧鑒診系統」數位營運平台的一致性認同觀點，進而推論出企業的使用態度和使用意願皆呈現積極正向的研究結果。研究建議未來企業採用數位平台，可考慮以上十二項影響因素分類和一致性認同觀點做為評估參考；並透過授權發展生態鏈系統、產業聯盟或廠商聯盟。另可朝改善平台架構和獲得高層支持，並期使企業採用SI 數位營運平台能朝商業模式方面發展。

Dr. Kai-Fu Lee proposed the future trend of OMO (Online-Merge-Offline), opening up a new system of circulation and integration of online and offline flow in the retail industry. Enterprises, facing the impact of epidemics and the competition for market survival, are constantly and actively looking for innovative development as well as a variety of fast and effective solutions. The emergence of new technologies and government policies are also actively promoting the upgrading of the digital application capabilities of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises. According to the “2022 White Paper on Small and Medium Enterprises in Taiwan”, the number of SMEs in Taiwan accounted for more than 98% of all enterprises in 2021. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen the digital capability of SMEs and introduce digital operation management. Focusing on SMEs, we adopt the digital operation platform of “Smart-In Intelligent Diagnosis System” as the research object (hereinafter referred to as SI System), which is constructed by the innovative concept of the sharing economy, and explore the attitudes and willingness of SMEs in adopting the SI System as the research target from the perspective of commercialization of the technology and new commodities. A questionnaire survey was first conducted to understand the relevant background of using digital platforms for 34 people who have adopted or are interested in learning more about digital platforms (not limited to SI System). Continuing to use in-depth interviews, six interviewees were invited and all of them are users of SI System, and business owners in their respective industries. We have done our best to collect valuable and representative research data related to the research purpose through the perspectives of interviewees with different characteristics and different industry experience. Through the grounded theory research method, the content of interview is discussed in depth in order to extract the enterprise's attitude, willingness, adoption factors, overall benefits and suggestions towards using SI System. Finally, four conclusions are found and concluded: (1)the classification of 12 influencing factors for enterprises adopting SI System, (2)a complete industry ecosystem might built while enterprises adopting SI System, (3)ecological chain systems, industry alliances, or manufacturer alliances might developed while enterprises adopting SI System and authorizing their business model, and (4) according to distinguishing between "Perceived Usefulness" and "Perceived Ease of Use", the consensus viewpoints extracted while enterprises adopting SI System, and then we can extrapolate the study result that the attitude and willingness of enterprises to use SI System are both positive. The study suggests that enterprises adopting digital platforms in the future can consider the classification of the above 12 influencing factors and consensus viewpoints as evaluation references, and develop ecological chain systems, industry alliances, or manufacturer alliances through authorization. In addition, it can improve in the sections of platform architecture and obtaining high-level support for SI System, and it is hoped that enterprises will adopt SI System to develop towards the section of business model.

一、中文部份
王欽堂（2016）。互聯網醫療平台商業模式之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/67ns22
王文科、王智弘（2010）。質的研究的信度和效度。彰化師大教育學報， 17，29-50。https://doi.org/10.6769/jencue.201006.0029
未來流通（2021年9月28日）。台灣OMO零售全通路產業地圖全公開，3大趨勢看超商、百貨、電商佈局。未來流通研究所。 https://www.mirai.com.tw/2021-taiwan-industry-omo-strategy-analysis/
任家慧（2021）。以科技接受模式探討廣播新媒體對受眾之影響—以國際短波廣播良友電台為例（未出版之碩士論文）。世新大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/mru9j2
吳雨桓（2019）。自我服務科技使用意圖之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立高雄大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/t79yme
吳柏毅（2019）。以科技接受度模式探討無紙化行動會議應用程式（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺北科技大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/zwaf2c
吳麗珍、黃惠滿 、李浩銑（2014）。方便取樣和立意取樣之比較。護理雜誌，61（3），105-111。https://doi.org/10.6224/jn.61.3.105
吳元熙（2021年4月28日）。近7成領導者認為「生態系」是成功途徑！它為何成企業競爭最熱關鍵詞？。數位時代。https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/62553/ecosystem-enterprise-competition-may
吳元熙（2020年2月19日）。Coursera靠「養人才」當上獨角獸！你知道上一堂職場技能課要多少錢嗎？。數位時代。 https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/527/coursera-online-library
呂承寬（2020）。數位軍史的科技接受度─以獨立遊戲《返校》為例（未出版之碩士論文）。大仁科技大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/w47gkf
李雅筑（2019）。以科技接受模式探討雲端IoT智慧藥盒之使用意圖（未出版之碩士論文）。正修科技大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/9snj4a
沈維君（2021）。以科技接受模式探討智慧型販賣機使用意圖-以有機小農產品為例（未出版之碩士論文）。中華大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/4n83gk
何英奇（2011年6月10日）。紮根理論的編碼方法。質性研究法研討會，桃園市，台灣。https://ap2.pccu.edu.tw/webPublic/pubDownloadFile.asp?strFilePath=TeacherRecAssMgmt&strFileName=93009022907446321.pdf
周文鵬（2019）。當代臺灣漫畫的創作及產業變遷－通往數位平台的困境與省思。休閒研究，8（2），1-17。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh?DocID=20732368-201903-201904190005-201904190005-1-17
林本炫（2007）。不同質性方法的資料分析比較。南華大學。ISBN：9789578210608
林南（2007）。社會資本理論與研究簡介。社會科學論叢，1（1），1-32。https://doi.org/10.30401/rss.200704_1(1).0001
邱莉燕（2015年11月20日）。3分鐘搞懂互聯網＋。遠見雜誌。https://www.gvm.com.tw/article/21162
范揚松（2022年）。SI打造內外循環獲利雙引擎系統。新王道人力資源股份有限公司。
洪詠恩（2018）。以「科技接受模式」探討私立國小學童家長接受平板教學態度之研究－以新北市某私立小學為例（未出版之碩士論文）。輔仁大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/9z65ur
柏克、顏西提、拉哈尼（2017年3月6日）。數位營運成功的四大支柱。哈佛商業評論。 https://www.hbrtaiwan.com/article/16753/what-the-companies-on-the-right-side-of-the-digital-business-divide-have-in-common
張志銘（2018）。智慧校園行政人員自動化設備使用意願之研究－以臺中市立高級中等學校為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立中興大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/u26qgy
張永福（2015）。資訊系統接受後持續使用模式之後設分析：不同的文化背景、研究場景與研究樣本的調節影響（未出版之碩士論文）。國立彰化師範大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/f4q4j3
郭峻延（2020）。以科技接受模式的觀點探討臺南市國小教師對於觸控顯示器之使用意願（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺南大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/dh3tu8
陳伊柔（2021）。不同世代對預立醫療決定的接受度之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。朝陽科技大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/ueh9sd
陳柏志（2005）。以科技接受模式探討推動電子貿易關鍵因素之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。大同大學。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh1?DocID=U0081-0607200917232484
曾柏瑜（2018）。資訊科技融入教學創新應用績優團隊之個案研究。國立臺東大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/47nd5p
斯維雯（2019）。以使用者經驗為中心之遠距健康照護科技接受模式之研究 －以竹山秀傳醫院遠距健康照護中心為例（未出版之博士論文）。國立政治大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/c29t3v
曾博彥（2020）。以高齡者步行行為探討智慧農村之發展-以臺中市大甲區為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺北科技大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/g2qxd8
曾詩文、 林弘昌（2022）。L傳產公司關鍵人才人格特質與工作績效之研究－以MBTI評量系統實施評估。科技與人力教育季刊，8（4），66-87。https://doi.org/10.6587/jthre.202206_8(4).0004
黃家軒（2020）。影響消費者使用行動支付意願之比較研究以台灣與馬來西亞為例（未出版之碩士論文）。南臺科技大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/d6ts6t
廖珮妏（2011）。企業導入數位學習之創新擴散通用模型與整合型科技接受模式的多層次分析（未出版之博士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學。 https://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh1?DocID=U0021-1610201315233878
廖珮妏、余鑑、于俊傑（2012）。應用整合型科技接受模式與創新擴散通用模型於企業導入數位學習之多層次分析。電子商務學報，14（4），657-687。https://doi.org/10.6188/jeb.2012.14(4).04
蔡政安（2020年5月8日）。FHH關鍵技術與商業模式。YouTube。 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJ-O2OTIH4k
潘玉龍（2021）。體育教育人員實施行動學習教學之研究-以科技接受模式角度切入（未出版之博士論文）。國立臺中教育大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/359bar
鄭雅琪、成裔、林盈輝、蔡仁堂、鄧亞菁（2018）。運用多元數位科技提升管理服務效能。證券服務，665，38-49。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh?docid=P20150728001-201806-201806220012-201806220012-38-49
盧秀鳳（2018）。以手機APP導入高中職健康管理之影響性研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立屏東大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/u5779p
駱詩晨（2021）。以科技接受度模式探討醫院就診智慧服務之關鍵因素及使用意願-以臺大醫院雲林分院為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立雲林科技大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/2p3588
簡振興（2011）。以科技接受模式探討體感數位遊戲式學習應用於大學生日語學習之研究-以詞彙語尾變化為例（未出版之博士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/nz32tf
蘇耕役（2012）。資訊科技接受度的跨世代比較研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立高雄師範大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/4hx2w6

二、外文部份
Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. Action Control, Springer Series in Social Psychology, 11-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2
Ajzen, I. (1989). Attitude structure and behavior. In A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler, & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude structure and function (pp. 241–274). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice Hall.
Ajzen, I., & Madden, T. J. (1986). Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22(5), 453-474. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(86)90045-4
Akmana, I., & Mishra, A. (2015). Sector diversity in green information technology practices: Technology acceptance model perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 477-486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.009
Alfadda, H. A., & Mahdi, H. S. (2021). Measuring students’ use of zoom application in language course based on the technology acceptance model (TAM). Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 50, 883-900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-020-09752-1
Al-Suqri, M. N., & Al-Kharusi, R. M. (2015). Ajzen and Fishbein's theory of reasoned action (TRA) (1980). In Information Seeking Behavior and Technology Adoption: Theories and Trends (pp. 17). IGI Global.
Bailyn, L. (1977). Research as a cognitive process: Implications for data analysis. Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, 11, 97-117. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00151906
Boyd, B., & Wandersman, A. (1991). Predicting undergraduate condom use with the Fishbein and Ajzen and the Triandis attitude-behavior models: Implications for public health interventions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21(22), 1810-1830. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1991.tb00506.x
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 903-1028. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
Doub, A. E., Levin, A., Heath, C. E., & LeVangie, K. (2015). Mobile app-etite: Consumer attitudes towards and use of mobile technology in the context of eating behaviour. Journal of Direct, Data and Digital Marketing Practice, 17(2), 114-129. https://doi.org/10.1057/dddmp.2015.44
Dougherty, D. (2002). Grounded theory research methods. In The Blackwell Companion to Organizations (pp. 849-866). Blackwell.
Dougherty, D. J., SU, Y., & Chung, K. (2012). Qualitative researh and data analysis. In Chen, X. P., Tsui, A. S., & Farh J. L. (Eds.), Empirical Methods in Organization and Management Research (2nd ed.) (pp.272-296). Peking University Press.
Fielding, N. G., & Fielding, J. L. (1986). Linking data: the articulation of qualitative and quantitative methods in social research. Beverley Hills.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Transaction.
Kamal, S. A., Shafiq, M., & Kakria, P. (2020). Investigating acceptance of telemedicine services through an extended technology acceptance model (TAM). Technology in Society, 60(4), 101212. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0160791X19300909
King, W. R., & He, J. (2006). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 43(6), 740-755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.05.003
Koufaris, M. (2002). Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online consumer behavior. Information Systems Research, 13(2), 205-223. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.2.205.83
Lah, U., Lewis, J. R., & Šumak, B. (2020). Perceived usability and the modified technology acceptance model. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 36(13), 1216-1230. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1727262
Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 40(3), 191-204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00143-4
Lin, C. C., & Lu, H. (2000). Towards an understanding of the behavioural intention to use a web site. International Journal of Information Management, 20(3), 197-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0268-4012(00)00005-0
Mathieson, K., Peacock, E., & Chin, W. W. (2001). Extending the technology acceptance model: The influence of perceived user resources. ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 32(3), 86-112. https://doi.org/10.1145/506724.506730
Moon, J. W., & Kim, Y. G. (2001). Extending the TAM for a world-wide-web context. Information & Management, 38(4), 217-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(00)00061-6
Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Sage Publications.
Prasad, A., & Prasad, P. (2002). The coming of age of interpretive organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 5(1), 4-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428102051002.
Ragin, C. C., Nagel, J., & White, P. (2003, July11-12). Workshop on scientific foundations of qualitative research. Workshop of National Science Foundation in Arlington, Virginia, United States. https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2004/nsf04219/nsf04219.pdf
Ryu, S., Ho, S. H., & Han, I. (2003). Knowledge sharing behavior of physicians in hospitals. Expert Systems with Applications 25(1), 113-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0957-4174(03)00011-3
Sarver, V. T. (1983). Ajzen and Fishbein's "theory of reasoned action": A critical assessment. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 13(2), 155-164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1983.tb00469.x
Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge University Press.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1997). Grounded theory in practice. SAGE Publications, Inc.
Szajna, B. (1996). Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Management Science, 42(1), 85-92. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2633017
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 85-188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.6.2.144
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 169-332. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926