全球汽車大廠紛紛看好電動車市場，積極投入人工智慧自動駕駛的軟體專業技術研發，美國特斯拉一直是市場的領先者，惟先行者通常必須付出相當大的代價經歷各種錯誤與修正，並且不斷創新與調整。在臺灣，電動車屬於萌芽時期，尤其以特斯拉為主要消費市場，本研究以臺灣特斯拉消費者為研究對象，研究者本身以特斯拉車主角度出發，並且結合心理學具代表性的計畫行為理論，目的為探討臺灣特斯拉消費者持有特斯拉的意圖，進行研究架構的擬定與問卷設計調查。本研究的衡量變數為：持有特斯拉的態度、持有特斯拉的主觀規範、持有特斯拉的知覺行為控制，其中持有特斯拉的態度由認知信念組成，包含了：充電便利信念、軟體品質信念、硬體服務信念以及經濟效益信念。
實證結果顯示，認知信念與持有持斯拉的態度呈正向關係。持有特斯拉的態度、持有特斯拉的知覺行為控制，對特斯拉消費者繼續持有特斯拉有正向的影響效果;而持有特斯拉的主觀規範，則對繼續持有特斯拉並無顯著的影響效果。透過研究結果與建議，期盼能為臺灣創造完善的電動車環境，朝向綠能永續推進。

All global famous automobile companies have high expectations in the electric vehicle market and are investing a lot in developing auto-driving systems and vehicle AI technology. Tesla has been the market leader, but the first movers usually have to pay a high price for their mistakes and corrections, and continue to innovate and adjust. In Taiwan, electric vehicles are in their infancy period, and the main popular consumer brand is Tesla. This study was conducted to investigate the intentions of Tesla consumers in Taiwan from the perspective of Tesla owners, and to combine the representative planning behavior theory of psychology. The purpose is to study the ownership intention of the Tesla owners in Taiwan by specific survey. The variables measured in this study are: attitude toward Tesla ownership, subjective norm of Tesla ownership, and perceptual behavioral control of Tesla ownership. The attitude toward Tesla ownership consists of cognitive beliefs, including: charging convenience beliefs, software quality beliefs, hardware service beliefs, and economic benefit beliefs.
The empirical results show that cognitive beliefs are positively related to the attitude of holding a Tesla. Tesla-holding attitude and perceptual behavioral control of Tesla-holding had a positive effect on Tesla consumers' continued ownership of Tesla, while subjective norms of Tesla-holding did not have a significant effect on continued ownership of Tesla. Through the study results and recommendations, we hope to create a perfect electric vehicle environment for Taiwan, and move toward green energy in a sustainable way.

參考文獻
一、英文參考文獻
Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In Action control (pp. 11-39). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

Ajzen, I. (1989). Attitude structure and behavior. Attitude structure and function, 241, 274.

Azjen, I. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood cliffs.

Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 16(1), 74-94.

Carley, S., Krause, R. M., Lane, B. W., & Graham, J. D. (2013). Intent to purchase a plug-in electric vehicle: A survey of early impressions in large US cites. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 18, 39-45.

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.

Gan, Y., Wang, M., Lu, Z., & Kelly, J. (2021). Taking into account greenhouse gas emissions of electric vehicles for transportation de-carbonization. Energy Policy, 155, 112353.

Hao, H., Qiao, Q., Liu, Z., Zhao, F., & Chen, Y. (2017). Comparing the life cycle Greenhouse Gas emissions from vehicle production in China and the USA: implications for targeting the reduction opportunities. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 19(5), 1509-1522.

Hair, J., Andreson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. 5th (ed) Prentice-Hall Inc. Unites States of America..

Harrison, G., & Thiel, C. (2017). An exploratory policy analysis of electric vehicle sales competition and sensitivity to infrastructure in Europe. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 165-178.

Hee, O. C. (2014). Validity and Reliability of the Customer-Oriented Behaviour Scale in the Health Tourism Hospitals in Malaysia. International Journal of Caring Sciences, 7(3).

Hidrue, M. K., Parsons, G. R., Kempton, W., & Gardner, M. P. (2011). Willingness to pay for electric vehicles and their attributes. Resource and energy economics, 33(3), 686-705.

Jack, N. B. (2020). Prospects for Electric Vehicles. Sustainability (Basel, Switzerland), 12(5813), 5813.

Jensen, A. F., Cherchi, E., & Mabit, S. L. (2013). On the stability of preferences and attitudes before and after experiencing an electric vehicle. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 25, 24-32.

KV, S., Michael, L. K., Hungund, S. S., & Fernandes, M. (2022). Factors influencing adoption of electric vehicles–A case in India. Cogent Engineering, 9(1), 2085375.

Shalender, K., & Sharma, N. (2021). Using extended theory of planned behaviour (TPB) to predict adoption intention of electric vehicles in India. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(1), 665-681.

Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of psychology.

Noel, L., de Rubens, G. Z., Kester, J., & Sovacool, B. K. (2020). Understanding the socio-technical nexus of Nordic electric vehicle (EV) barriers: A qualitative discussion of range, price, charging and knowledge. Energy Policy, 138, 111292.

Othman, K. (2022). Multidimension Analysis of Autonomous Vehicles: The Future of Mobility. Civil Engineering Journal, 7, 71-93.

Ouyang, D., Ou, X., Zhang, Q., & Dong, C. (2020). Factors influencing purchase of electric vehicles in China. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 25(3), 413-440.

Ozaki, R., & Sevastyanova, K. (2011). Going hybrid: An analysis of consumer purchase motivations. Energy policy, 39(5), 2217-2227.

Pearre, N. S., Kempton, W., Guensler, R. L., & Elango, V. V. (2011). Electric vehicles: How much range is required for a day’s driving?. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 19(6), 1171-1184.

Sheppard, B. H., Hartwick, J., & Warshaw, P. R. (1988). The theory of reasoned action: A meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research. Journal of consumer research, 15(3), 325-343.

Sovacool, B. K., Abrahamse, W., Zhang, L., & Ren, J. (2019). Pleasure or profit? Surveying the purchasing intentions of potential electric vehicle adopters in China. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 124, 69-81.

Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995). Assessing IT usage: The role of prior experience. MIS quarterly, 561-570.

Zhou, Y., & Li, S. (2018). Technology adoption and critical mass: the case of the US electric vehicle market. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 66(2), 423-480.

Ziegler, A. (2012). Individual characteristics and stated preferences for alternative energy sources and propulsion technologies in vehicles: A discrete choice analysis for Germany. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46(8), 1372-1385.

二、中文參考文獻
比利夏. (2020). 影響消費者決定購買環境責任電動車之關鍵因素:台灣觀點.

周敬烈. (2014). 結合計畫行為理論與新產品採用模型 探討消費者對純電動車之使用意圖.

洪德俊, 薛義誠, 陳玉蕙, & 劉惠美. (2014). 台灣電動車產業商業模式之研究 [A Study on Business Model for Taiwan's BEV Industry]. 創業管理研究, 9(1), 27-57.

邱皓政. (2006). 量化研究與統計分析-SPSS 中文視窗版資料分析範例解析. 五南圖書出版股份有限公司.

高碩謙. (2022).探討消費者對於電動汽車之購買因素

張乃瑄, & 陳筱琪. (2019).美國特斯拉營運演變對我國廠商之影響. 經濟前瞻, (181), 87-91.

張舜淵, 戴子純, 吳清如, 任雅婷, & 陳柏瑞.(2019). 國內行車成本推估及調查方法之檢討. 都市交通, 34(2), 11-33.

葉俊賢, 陳格致, & 楊龍隆. (2014). 應用 TOPSIS 於汽車維修廠服務品質改善之研究. 危機管理學刊, 11(1), 1-12.

蘇裕凱. (2022). 電動汽車購買意願分析-以臺灣為例.

嚴建國. (2022). 翻轉世界，電動車廠商經營發展策略分析 —以特斯拉公司(Tesla Inc.)為例.