本研究透過兩個實驗探討不同閱讀能力大學生閱讀策略使用差異，以及閱讀策略教學課程對低閱讀能力大學生閱讀策略運用及摘要表現的影響。
實驗一以42名不同閱讀能力的台灣師範大學大學生為研究對象，以放聲思考原案分析，探討不同閱讀能力的大學生在閱讀策略使用上的差異。結果顯示，高閱讀能力的大學生比低閱讀能力者在精緻化策略、重新建構策略、理解監控策略的使用較頻繁。實驗二根據實驗一的發現，針對低閱讀能力大學生較少使用的策略設計三種閱讀策略教學課程，並進一步探討不同閱讀策略教學課程對學生策略使用與摘要表現的影響。
實驗二的研究對象為83名低閱讀能力大學生，其中，19名學生接受精緻化策略教學課程（實驗一）；20名學生接受組織統整策略教學課程（實驗二）；24名學生接受理解監控策略教學課程（實驗組三）；另有20名學生為控制組。實驗組接受為期四週，每週一節（50分鐘）的閱讀策略教學課程；控制組不接受教學課程。所得資料以共變數分析、趨向分析驗證假設。結果顯示：
在中測，閱讀策略教學對三個實驗組學生的閱讀策略使用有增進效果，不過在摘要能力上，只有「理解監控策略教學組」有顯著增進效果。
在後測，閱讀策略教學對三個實驗組學生的閱讀策略使用有增進效果，其中，「組織統整策略教學組」的增進效果比「精緻化策略教學組」、「理解監控策略教學組」為高。在摘要方面則是只有「精緻化策略教學組」與「組織統整策略教學組」對於學生的摘要能力有提升效果。
四週閱讀策略教學結果顯示，閱讀策略教學課程有助於三個實驗組大學生的閱讀策略運用。實驗組在前、中、後測的趨向分析結果顯示，各組學生在其所接受訓練的閱讀策略類型之使用進步情形呈現直線趨向。摘要能力方面，閱讀策略教學課程對於「組織統整策略教學組」、「精緻化策略教學組」的摘要表現有增進作用，其中又以「組織統整策略教學組」有較佳的摘要能力增進效果。至於，閱讀策略教學課程對「理解監控策略教學組」的摘要能力增進作用，則會受到文本難度影響，當文本比較簡單時，讀者的摘要表現較好，當文本變難時，讀者的摘要表現反而不理想。

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of three reading strategy instructions on strategic reading and summary performance of college students with low reading ability.
Experiment one（E1）was designed to investigate the reading strategy difference between good readers and poor readers. Participants were 42 college students with different reading ability (21 good readers, 21 poor readers.) The think aloud method was adopted to investigate the reading strategy difference between two groups. The results in E1 showed that students with high reading ability use re-construction, elaboration, and monitoring strategy more often than the students with low reading ability.
　　The design of experiment two （E2）was based on the empirical finding of E1. Three reading strategy instructions with direct teaching and reciprocal teaching were conducted to investigate the effects of strategy instruction on low reading ability college students’ reading strategy and summary performance.
The participants in E2 were 83 students among four groups. There were 19 in the elaboration strategy group (G1), 20 in the organization strategy group (G2), 24 in the monitor strategy group (G3), and 20 in the control group (G4). The G1, G2 and G3 except G4 received 50 minutes reading comprehension strategies courses once a week in four weeks. The strategy training included three modes of instruction: elaboration, organization, and monitor during the fall of 2009. Students were taught and practice reading strategy during the training. They were asked to summary after a think aloud procedure at testing sessions. The data obtained were analyzed by ANCOVA and trend analysis.
　　The results were as follows: The outcome of the mid-test displayed that the improvement of reading strategy performance among G1, G2 and G3 was increased. The improvement of summary performance increased significantly only in G3. The outcome of the post-test displayed that the improvement of reading strategy performance among G1, G2 and G3 was increased. G2 had a better improvement than G1 and G3. The outcome of the post-test illustrated that the improvement of summary performance increased only in G1 and G2.The trend analysis at three time points: pre-test, mid-test, and post-test was adopted for the progress of strategy and summary performance . There is a linear trend for the G1, G2 and G3.
　　The results of this study suggested that the three reading strategy instructions can help to improve the utilization of reading strategies in G1, G2 and G3. The effects of the three reading strategies on summary performance were better in G2 than in G1. The summary performance in G3 relates with the difficulty of texts. The summary performance of G3 is better in easier texts. Moreover, the achievement of summary performance in G3 decreased when the texts became more difficult.

一、中文部分
林清山（1998）：心理與教育統計學。台北市：東華書局。
林新沛（2005）：標準化迴歸係數的正確解釋。中山管理評論，13卷，2期，533-548頁。
沈欣怡（2007）：「推論性問題引導課程」對國小四年級學童推論理解與閱讀理解能力之影響。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系碩士論文。
郭靜姿（2005）不同閱讀能力學生成敗歸因方式、策略運用與後設認知能力差異比較。師大學報，39卷，84-325頁。
洪儷瑜（2009）：閱讀理解教學研究回顧。「台灣閱讀研究回顧與展望」。國科會人文處。
張國恩、蘇宜芬、宋曜廷（2000）。閱讀理解輔助系統之設計及其應用效果研究─以閱讀障礙學生為例：統整式教學策略的設計。國科會輔助研究計劃， NSC89-2614-S-003-003。
宋曜廷、黃嶸生、張國恩 (2002)：具多重策略的閱讀理解輔助系統之設計與應用。第四屆華人心理學家學術研討會暨第六屆華人心理與行為科際學術研討會。11月9-12。台北。
楊孝爃（1989）。內容分析。社會及行為科學研究法下冊。台北：東華。
連啟舜（2001）：國內閱讀理解教學研究成效之統合分析研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學研究所碩士論文。
蘇宜芬（2008）：大學生閱讀策略運用之個別差異研究-以眼球追蹤及放聲思考資料分析。行政院國家科學委員會經費補助研究計畫 (NSC 97- 2410-H-003-047)
蘇宜芬、林清山（1992）。後設認知訓練課程對國小低閱讀能力學生的閱讀理解能力與後設認知能力之影響。教育心理學報，25卷，45-267頁。
魏靜雯（2004）：心智繪圖與摘要教學對國小五年級學生閱讀理解與摘要能力之影響。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系碩士論文。

二、西文部分
Adams, B.C., Bell, L.C., & Perfetti, C.A. (1995). A trading relationship between reading skill and domain knowledge in children's text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 20, 307-323.
Alexander, P. A., & Jeffon, J. L. (1994). Contrasting instructional and structural importance: The seductive effect of teacher questions. Journal of Reading Behavior, 26, 19-45.
Alexander, P.A., & Judy, J.E.(1988). The interaction of domain-specific knowledge in academic performance. Review of Educational Research, 58, 375-404.
Alexander, P.A., Murphy, P. K., Woods, B. S., Duhon, K. E., & Parker, D. (1997). College instruction and concomitant changes in students’ knowledge, interest, and strategy use: A study of domain learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 125-146.
Almasi, J. F. (2003). Teaching strategic processes in reading. New York; London: Guilford Press.
Anderson, R. (1994). Role of the reader's schema in comprehension, learning, and memory. In Ruddell, R. B. & Singer, M. (Eds.), (pp. 469-82). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984b). Metacognitive skills in reading. In P.D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp 353-394).New YorkLongman.
Balajthy, E., & Weisberg, R. (1990). Effects of Reading Ability, Prior Knowledge, Topic Interest, and Locus of Control on At-Risk College Students' Use of Graphic Organizers and Summarizing. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Reading Conference (Miami, FL, December 27-30)
Barten, I., & Samuelstuem, M. (2004). Does the influences of reading purpose on reports of strategic text processing depend on students’ topic knowledge? Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2). 324-336.
Bartlett, F.C. (1932). Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology. Cambridge University Press.
Baumann, J. F. Jones, L.A., & Seifert-Kessell, N.(1993). Monitoring Reading Comprehension by Thinking Aloud. Instructional Resource No.1. ERIC Document Reproduction Services, ED 360 612
Baylor, A. L., & McCormick, C. B. (2003). Thematic awareness and recall of information from text. Reading and Writing, 16, 247-258.
Beishuizen, J., Stoutjesdijk, E., Spuijbroek, S., Bouwmeester, S., & van der Geest, H. (2002). Understanding abstract expository texts, Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 279-297.
Brandao, A. C., & Oakhill, J. (2005). How do you know this answer? Children's use of text data and general knowledge in story comprehension. Reading and Writing, 18, ,687-713.
Braten, I., & Stromoso, H. (2003). A longitudinal think-aloud study of spontaneous strategic processing during the reading of multiple expository texts. Reading and Writing, 16, 195-218.
Brown, A. L., & Day, J. D. (1983). Macrorules for summarizing texts: The development of expertise. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 1-14.
Calvo, M. G. (2001). Working memory and inference: Evidence from eye fixations during reading, Memory, 9(4), 365-381.
Cote, N., & Goldman, S. (2004). Building representations of informational text: evidence from children’s think-aloud protocols. In R. B. Ruddell, & N. J. Unrau,(Ed.). Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading 5th Edition(pp.660-683). Newark:International Reading Association.
Courtis, S. A. (1914). Standard test in English. Elementary School teacher, 14, 374-392.
Cromley, J. G., & Azevedo, R. (2007). Testing and Refining the Direct and Inferential Mediation Model of Reading Comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 315-325.
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 19, 450-466.
Daniels, H. (2002). Expository text in literature circles. Voices From the Middle, 9,7-14.
Davey, B., & McBride, S. (1986). Effects of question-generation training on reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(4), 256-262.
Dewitz, P., Jones, J., & Leahy, S. (2009). Comprehension strategy instruction in core reading program. Reading Research Quartely, 44(2), 102-126.
DiCecco, V. M., & Gleason, M. M. (2002). Using Graphic Organizers to Attain Relational Knowledge From Expository Text. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35(4), 306-320.
Doyle, W. (1983). Academic work. Review of Education Research, 53, 159-199.
Duke, N.K., & Pearson, D. (2002). Effective Practices for Developing Reading Comprehension. In A. E. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What Research Has To Say About Reading Instruction 3rd ed.(pp.205-242). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Dymock, S. (1998). Teaching exposiotry text structure awareness (pp. 62-69). In D. Lapp & D. Fisher. Essential reading on comprehension. International Reading Assossation.
Dymock, S. (2005). Teaching expository text structure awareness. The Reading Teacher, 59(2), 177-181.
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1984). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2007). Increasing strategic reading comprehension with peer-assisted learning activites(pp.175-197). In D. S., McNamara (Ed.), Reading comprehension strategies: Theory, interventions, and technologies. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Mathes, P. G., & Simmons, D.C.(1997). Peer-assisted learning strategies: Marking classrooms more responsive to diversity. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 174-206.
Gagne, R. M. (1985). The conditions of Learning (3rd. ed.). New York: Holy, Rinehart and Winston.
Goldman, S. R., & Bisanz, G. (2002). Toward a functional analysis of scientific genres: Implications for understanding and learning processes. In J. Otero, J. A. León & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), The psychology of science text comprehension (pp. 19-50). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Graesser A.C. (2007). An introduction to stragegic reading comprehension(pp.3-26) In D. S., McNamara (Ed.). Reading comprehension strategies: Theory, interventions, and technologies. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Graesser, A. C., & Clark, L. F. (1985). A model of inference generation during narrative comprehension. In G. Rickheit (Ed.), Inferences in text processing. Amsterdam: Horth Holland.
Graesser, A. C., & Person, N. K. (1994). Question asking during tutoring. American Educational Research Journal, 31(1), 104-137.
Graesser, A. C., Bertus, E. L., & Magliano, J. P. (1995). Inference generation during the comprehension of narrative text. In Lorch, R. & OÕBrien, E. (Eds.), Sources of coherence in text comprehension (pp. 295-320). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Graesser, A. C., Golding, J. M., & Long, D. L. (1991). Narrative representation and comprehension. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research. London: Longman.
Graesser, A. C., Singer M., & Trabasso (1994), T. Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371–395.
Graesser, A.C., & Bertus, E.L. (1998). The construction of causal inference while reading expository texts on science and technology, Scientific Studies of Reading, 2(3), 247-269.
Graesser, A.C., Millis, K. K., & Zwaan, R. A. (1997). Discourse comprehension. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 163-189.
Greene, B. A. (1995). Comprehension of expository text from an unfamiliar domain: Effects of instruction that provides either domain-specific or strategy knowledge. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, 313-319.
Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Barbosa, P., Perencevich, K. C., Taboada, M. H. D., & Scafidd, N. T. (2004). Increasing Reading Comprehension and Engagement Through Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 403-423.
Hacker, D. J. (1998), Definitions and empirical foundations., In Hacker, D.J., Dunlosky, J. and Graesser, A.C.(Ed), Metacognition in educational theory and practice., 1-24, Mahwah, New Jeresy: Erlbaurn.
Haenggi, D., & Perfetti, C. A. (1992). Individual differences in reprocessing of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 182-192.
Hall, K., Sabey, B., & McClellan, M. (2005). Expository Text Comprehension: Helping Primary-Grade Teachers Use Expository Texts to Full Advantage. Reading Psychology, 26, 211
Hamman, D., Berthelot, J., Saia, J., & Crowley, E. (2000). Teachers' coaching of learning and its relation to students' strategic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), 342-348.
Hamman, D., Berthelot, J., Saia, J., & Crowley, E. (2000). Teachers’ coaching of learning and its relation to students' strategic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 342-348.
Hannon, B., & Daneman, M. (1998). Facilitating knowledge-based inferences in less-skilled readers. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 149-172.
Hart, E. R., & Speece, D. L. (1998). Reciprocal teaching goes to college: Effects for postsecondary students at risk for academic failure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(4), 670-681.
Hidi, S., & Anderson, V. (1986). Producing written summaries: Task demands, cognitive operations, and implications for instruction. Review of Educational Research, 56 (4), 473-493.
Hoz, R., Bowman, D., & Kozminsky, E. (2001). The differential effects of prior knowledge on learning: A study of two consecutive courses in earth sciences. Instructional Science, 29, 187-211.
Hyona, J., & Nurminen, A. M. (2006). Do adult readers know how they read? Evidence from eye movement patterns and verbal reports. British Journal of Psychology, 97, 31-50.
Hyona, J., Lorch, R. F., & Kaakinen, J. K. (2002). Individual differences in reading to summarize expository text: evidence from eye fixation patterns, Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 44-55.
Hyona, J., Lorch, R.F., Jr., & Rinck, M. (2003). Eye movement measures to study global text processing. In J. Hyona, R. Radach & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 313-334). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
Johnson, A. M., Barnes, M. A., & Desrochers, A. (2008). Reading comprehension: Developmental processes, individual differences, and intervention. Canadian Psychology, 49, 125–132.
Johnson-Glenberg, M. C. (2000). Training Reading Comprehension in Adequate Decoders/Poor Comprehenders: Verbal versus visual strategies, Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(4), 772-782.
Kaakinen, J. K., & Hyona, J. (2005). Perspective Effects on Expository Text Comprehension: Evidence From Think-Aloud Protocols, Eye-tracking, and Recall , Discourse Processes: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kendeou, P., & van den Broek, P. (2005). The effects of readers’ misconceptions on comprehension of Scientific text, Journal of Educational Psychology, 97,(2). 235-245.
Kendeou, P., & van den Broek, P. (2007). The effects of prior knowledge and text structure on comprehension processes during reading of scientific texts. Memory and Cognition, 35(7), 1567-1577.
Kendeou, P., van den Broek, P., & Lynch, J. (2007). Comprehension in preschool and early elementary children: Skill development and strategy interventions(pp.27-45). In D. S., McNamara (Ed.). Reading comprehension strategies: Theory, interventions, and technologies. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kieras, D. E. (1984). A method for comparing a simulation to reading time data. In D. E. Kieras & M. Just (Eds.). New methods in reading comprehension research (pp. 299-325). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
King, A. (1989). Effect of self-questioning training on college students’ comprehension of lectures. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 14,1-16.
King, A. (2007). Beyond literal comprehension: A strategy to promote deep understanding of text (pp.267-290). In D. S., McNamara (Ed.). Reading comprehension strategies: Theory, interventions, and technologies. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kintsch, W. (1988). The use of knowledge in discourse processing: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163-182
Kintsch, W. A. (2002). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension. A conctruction-integration model. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kintsch, W., & Van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85 (5), 363-394.
Kobayashi, K. (2007). The Influence of critical reading orientation on external strategy use during expository text reading. Educational Psychology, 27(3), 363-375.
Lacroix, N. (1999). Macrostructure construction and organization in the processing of multiple text passages. Instructional Science, 27, 221-233.
León, J. A., & Carretero, M. (1995). Intervention in comprehension and memory strategies: Knowledge and use of text structure. Learning and Instruction, 5(3), 203-220.
Leutner, D., Leopold, C., & Elzen-Rump, V. D. (2007). Self-regulated learning with a text-highlighting strategy a training experiment. Journal of Psychology, 215(3), 174-182.
Long, D. L., Oppy, B. J., & Seely, M. R. (1994). Individual differences in the time course of inferential processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1456-1470.
Long, D. L., Wilson, J. Hurley, R., & Prat, C. S. (2006). Assessing text representations with recognition : The interaction of domain knowledge and text coherence. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(4), 816-827.
Lynch, L., Fawcett, A. J., & Nicolson, R. I. (2000). Computer-assisted reading intervention in a secondary school: An evaluation study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 31, 333-348.
Magliano, J. P., & Millis, K. K. (2003). Assessing reading skill with a think-aloud procedure. Cognition and Instruction, 3, 251-283.
Mandler, J., & Jhonson, N. (1977). Remembrance of things passed: story structure and recall. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 111-151.
Mangliano, J. P., Trabasso, T., & Graesser, A. C. (1999). Strategic processing during comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 615-629.
Marr, M. B., & Gormley, K. (1982). Children's recall of familiar and unfamiliar text. Reading Research Quarterly, 18, 89-104.
Mathes, P. G., Torgesen, J. K., & Allor, J. H. (2001). The effects of peer-assisted literacy strategies for first-grade readers with and without additional computer-assisted instruction in phonological awareness. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 371-410.
Mayer, R. E. (1984). Aids to text comprehension. Educational Psychologist, 19, 30-42.
Mayer, R. E. (1996). Learning strategies for making sense out of expository text: The SOI model for guiding three cognitive processes in knowledge construction. Educational Psychology Review, 8, 357-371.
McCrudden, M. T., Schraw, G., Lehman, S., & Poliquin, A. (2007). The effect of causal diagrams on text learning, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 367-388.
Mckoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Inference during reading. Psychologyical Review, 99, 440-466.
McNamara, D. S. (2004). SERT: Self-explanation reading training. Discourse Processes, 38(1), 1-30.
McNamara, D. S. (2007). Reading comprehension strategies: Theory, interventions, and technologies. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
McNamara, D. S., Ozuru, Y., Best, R., & O'Reilly, T. (2007). The 4-Pronged Comprehension Strategy Framework. In D.S. McNamara (Ed.), Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies (pp. 465-496). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Meyer, B. J. F. (1975). The organization of prose and its effects on memory. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Meyer, B. J., & Freedle, R. O. (1984). Effects of discourse type on recall. American Educational Research Journal, 21(1), 121-143.
Mikkila-Erdmann, M., Penttinen, M., Anto, E., & Olkinuora, E. (2008). Constructing mental models during learning from science text: eye tracking methodology meets conceptual change, Understanding Models for Learning and Instruction, 63-79.
Millis K. K., & King, A. (2001). Rereading strategically: The influences of comprehension ability and a prior reading on the memory for expository text, Reading Psychology, 22, 41-65.
Murphy, P. K., Wilkinson, I. A. G., Soter, A. O., Hennessey, M. N., & Alexander, J. F. (2009). Examining the effects of classroom discussion on students' high-level comprehension of text: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 740-764.
Murry, J. D., & McGlone, C.(1997). Topic overviews and the processing of topic structure. Jounal of Educational Psychology, 89(2), 251-261.
Noordman, L. G. M., Vonk, W., & Kempff, H. J. (1992). Causal inferences during the reading of expository texts. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 573-590.
Okill, J., & Cain, K. (2007). Issues of Causality in children’s reading comprehension(pp.47-70). In D. S., McNamara (Ed.). Reading comprehension strategies: Theory, interventions, and technologies. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension- fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction,1, 117-175.
Paris, S., & Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 36, 89-101.
Pearson, P. D., & Hamm, D. N. (2005). The assessment of reading comprehension: A review of practices - past, present, and future (pp. 13-69). In S. G. Paris, & S. A. Stahl (Eds.), Children's reading comprehension and assessment. (pp. 131-160). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Pearson, P. D., Hansen, J., & Gordon, C. (1979). The effect of background knowledge on young children’s comprehension of explicit and implicit information. Journal of Reading Behavior, 11, 201-209.
Perels, F., Otto, B., Landmann, M., Hertel, S., & Schmitz, B. (2007). Journal of Psychology, 215(3). 194-204.
Pressley, M. (2002a). Comprehension strategies instruction: A turn-of-the century status report. In C. C. Block & M. Pressley (Eds.). Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 11-27). New York: Guilford.
Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
Pressley, M., Borkowski, J. G., & O'Sullivan, J. T. (1985). Children's metamemory and the teaching of memory strategies. In D. L. Forrest-Pressley, G. E. MacKinnon, & T. G. Waller (Eds.), Metacognition, cognition, and human performance (Vol. 1, pp. 111-149). New York: Academic Press.
Pressley, M., Goodchild, F., Fleet, J., Zajchowski, R., & Evans, E. D. (1989). The challenges of classroom instruction. Elementary School Journal, 89, 301-342.
Pressley-Forrest, D. L., & Gillies, L. A. (1985). Children’s flexible use of strategies during reading. In M. Pressley & J.R.Levin (Eds.), Cognitive strategy research educational applications. N.Y. : Springer-Verlag.
Rapp, D. N., van den Broek, P., McMaster, K. L., Kendeou, P., & Espin, C. A. (2007). Higher-order comprehension processes in struggling readers: A perspective for research and intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 289-312.
Rawson, K., & Dunloksy, J. (2002). Are performance predictions for text based on ease processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 28(1), 69-80.
Reichenberg, M. (2008). Making Students Talk about Expository Texts, Scandinavian. Journal of Educational Research,52(1). 17-39.
Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1994). Reciprocal teaching: A review of the research. Review of Education Research, 64, 479-530.
Samuelstuen, M., & Braten, I. (2005). Decoding, knowledge, and strategies in comprehension of expository text, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 46, 107-117.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1984). Development of Strategies in Text Processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Schank, R., & Abelson, R. (1977). Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding. Hillsdale, New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Schellings, G., Aarnoutse, C., & Leeuwe J. (2006). Third-graders’ think-aloud protocol: Types of reading activities in reading an expository text. Learning and Instruction, 16, 549-568.
Schieffle, U., & Krapp, A. (1996). Topic interest and free recall of expository text. Learning and individual differences, 8(2). 141-160.
Schommer, M., & Surber, J. R. (1986). Comprehension-Monitoring Failure in Skilled Adult Readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(5), 353-357.
Singer, M., & O’Connell, G. (2003). Robust inference processes in expository text comprehension. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 15(4), 607-631.
Singer, M., Graesser, A. C., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Minimal or global inference during reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 421–441.
Spires, H. A., & Donley, J. (1998). Prior knowledge activation: Inducing engagement with informational texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 249-260.
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R.F. (1989). Exposure to print and orthographic processing. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 402-433
Starch, D. (1915). The measurement of efficiency in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 6, 1-24.
Stromso, H. I., Barten, I., & Samuelstuen, M. S. (2003). Students' strategic use of multiple sources during expository text reading: A longitudinal think-aloud study. Cognition and Instruction, 21(2), 113-147.
Suber, J. R., & Schroeder, M. (2007). Effects of prior knowledge and heading on processing of informative text. Contemporary Educational Psycholgoy, 32, 485-498.
Suh, S., & Trabasso, T. (1993). Inference during reading: Converging evidence from discourse analysis, talk-aloud protocols, and recognition priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 279-300.
Swanson, H. L. (1999). Reading research for students with LD: A meta-analysis of intervention outcomes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 13, 52-55.
Torgesen, J. K. (1982). The learning disabled child as an inactive learner: Educational implications. Topics in Learning & Learnig Disabilities, 2(1), 45-52.
Trabasso, T., & Bouchard, E. (2002). Teaching readers how to comprehend text strategically. In C. C. Block & M. Pressley (Eds.). Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 176-200). New York: Guilford Press.
Trabasso, T., Secco, T., & van den Broek, P. (1984), Causal cohesion and story coherence, In H. Mandl, N. L. Stein, & T. Trabasso (Eds.), Learning and comprehension of a text (pp. 83-111). Hills- dale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Trabsso, T., & Suh, S. (1993). Understanding text: Achieving explanatory coherence through on-line inferences and mental operations in working memory. Discourse Processes.16, 3-34.
van den Broek, P. & Kremer, K. (2000). The mind in action: What it means to comprehend. In B. Taylor, P. van den Broek, & M. Graves (Eds.), Reading for meaning( pp. 1-31). New York: Teacher’s College Press.
van den Broek, P., Virtue, S., Everson, M., Tzeng, Y., & Sung, Y. C. (2002). Comprehension and memory of science texts: Inferential processes and the construction of a mental representation. In J. Otero, J. A. Leon, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), The psychology of science text comprehension (pp. 131-154). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
van den Broek, P., Young, M., Tzeng, Y., & Linderholm, T.(2004). The landscape model of reading: Inferences and online construction of a memory representation. In R. B. Ruddell & N. J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (pp.1244-1269). Newark, NJ: International Reading Association)
Vaughn, S., Klinger, J. K., & Bryant, D. P. (2001). Collaborative strategic reading as a means to enhance peer-mediated instruction for reading comprehension and content-area learning. Remedial & Special Education, 22, 66-74.
Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D.M., & Tanzman, M.S. (1994). Components of reading ability: Issues and problems in operationalizing word identification, phonological coding, and orthographic coding. In G.R. Lyon (Ed.), Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities: New views on measurement issues. (pp. 279-329). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
Walczyk, J. J., Marsiglia, C. S., Johns, A. K., & Bryan, K. S. (2004). Children’s compensations for poorly automated reading skills. Discourse Processes, 37, 47-66.
Weinstein, C. E., & Underwood, V. L. (1985). Learning strategies: The how of learning. In J. W. Segal, S. F. Chiman, & R. Glaser (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills (Vol. 1) Relating instruction to research. Hillsdale: LEA.
Winograd, P., & Johnston, P. (1982). Comprehension and the error detection paradigm. Journal of Reading Behavior, 14, 61 -76.
Zabrucky, K. M., & Moore, D. (1999). Influence of text genre on adults’ monitoring of understanding and recall. Educational Gerontology, 25, 601-709.