簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 廖婉如
論文名稱: 一位高中數學科初任實習輔導教師輔導歷程發展之個案研究
指導教授: 金鈐
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 數學系
Department of Mathematics
論文出版年: 2008
畢業學年度: 96
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 214
中文關鍵詞: 輔導知能發展輔導階段論輔導問題輔導內容與策略
英文關鍵詞: knowledge of mentoring, models of mentoring, contents and strategies of mentoring
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:170下載:24
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究採用個案研究法,搭配個案訪談、教室觀察、影片拍攝以及書面文件資料的收集,探討一位高中數學科初任實習輔導教師的輔導歷程。作者以Furlong & Maynard (1995)的輔導階段論作為描述個案學習發展輔導知能過程的架構,透過分析個案在輔導過程中所面對的問題與因應方式,以及輔導、教學和學習三個焦點之間的轉換情況,嘗試了解高中數學科初任實習輔導教師在一年的輔導過程中,所發展的輔導內容與策略以及輔導知能的發展過程。

    研究結果顯示,個案的輔導發展過程與實習教師學習數學教學的發展過程類似,在輔導初期懷抱熱忱並積極地想扮演好輔導者的角色,爾後由於輔導經驗的不足,在面對輔導問題與教學問題時,輔導重心慢慢轉移成教學者,到了輔導的後期,可能因為輔導成效不彰與實習教師學習意願降低的影響,個案已經不再主動扮演輔導者角色而是著重於教學者。此外,研究也發現,輔導的內容與策略是一體兩面的關係,並且和輔導問題是相互牽連影響的,同時,輔導內容與策略的施行結果也可能會引發出不同的輔導問題,形成一連串的「問題-內容與策略」這種交互作用的發展過程。

    本研究的結果應該有助於:數學師資培育者了解初任數學科實習輔導教師可能有的輔導知能發展過程和所面對的教學與輔導問題,以及對於輔導所可能造成的影響。並且,也提供後續研究者一個發展的方向:如何幫助初任實習輔導教師學習成為稱職的輔導者?以及如何釐清數學輔導教師所應具備的輔導知能?

    Case study with interviews, classroom observations, videos, and documents was used to explore the mentoring format and process of one senior high school mathematics teacher who was first time to be a mathematical mentor. The author uses Furlong & Maynard’s (1995) models of mentoring as the theoretical framework to describe the mentor teacher’s model and process of mentoring in mathematics teaching, and try to grasp the contents and strategies developed during the mentoring process and the emerged knowledge while mentoring his probationary teacher by analyzing the approaches used and the problems faced in the mentoring process. The major foci are mathematical mentoring, teaching and learning.

    The research results revealed that the development of the process of mentoring were similar to the phases of learning to teach mathematics for probationary teachers that Furlong & Maynard’s suggested. At the initial stages, the case had high zeal and was ambitiously try to play an active mentor, but he gradually changed his mentoring activities while facing the mentoring and teaching problems because of the emerging failure mentoring experiences. The mentor at the latter period was not playing the role of an active mentor, and this maybe resulted by the effects of little achievement and the low learning willingness of the probationary teacher. In addition, the results also showed that the contents and strategies of mentoring were intertwined with the mentoring problems. Furthermore, the implement of the mentoring contents and strategies probably cause different mentoring problems, and this will form an interacting developing process of a series of problems with these contents and strategies.

    The research results may contribute to: mathematical teacher educators in understanding the possible mentoring knowledge developing process and the problems that may be emerged and faced for the novice mentoring teachers, and the resulting possible effects that mathematical mentoring might bring about. Moreover, this result can also provide an expanding aspect for how to help the novice mentoring teachers face the new challenge of learning to be effective mentors and the mentoring content knowledge that a mentor should have.

    中文摘要 英文摘要 目次.........................................................Ⅰ 附錄目次.....................................................Ⅲ 圖目次.......................................................Ⅴ 表目次.......................................................Ⅸ 第一章 緒論............................................1 第一節 研究背景與動機......................................1 第二節 研究問題與目的......................................5 第二章 文獻探討......................................7 第一節 實習輔導教師的輔導策略與實習教師的發展階段..........7 第二節 數學教師的知識內涵與專業發展 ......................21 第三節 本研究的詮釋性架構.................................37 第三章 研究方法.....................................41 第一節 研究的場域和對象.................................. 41 第二節 質性取向的個案研究................................ 44 第三節 研究的設計........................................ 46 第四節 資料的整理與分析.................................. 53 第五節 研究的限制........................................ 58 第四章 研究結果.....................................63 第一節 輔導的場域........................................ 63 第二節 獨自面對新挑戰.................................... 67 第三節 尋求支援和認同................................... 112 第四節 漸行漸遠的師徒................................... 119 第五節 實習三階段的總結................................. 175 第五章 回顧和討論.................................181 第一節 初任實習輔導教師的輔導策略與內容................. 181 第二節 初任實習輔導教師的輔導知能發展過程 .............. 192 第六章 結論和建議.................................203 參考文獻................................................209

    中文部分

    吳芝儀、廖梅花(譯) (2004)。A. Strauss及J.Corbin著。質性研究入門:紮根理論研究方法(Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory )。台北市:濤石。
    尚榮安(譯) (2001)。個案研究法(Case study research design and methods)。台北市:弘智文化。
    林恆理(2005)。八位學生教師數學教學知識的個案研究:以無限概念為例。國立台灣師範大學碩士論文,台北市。
    林福來(2000)。學習教數學的培育過渡與專業發展研究文獻(1/3)。國科會專題研究計劃進度報告,國立台灣師範大學數學系。
    林碧珍、蔡文煥(2007)。小學數學領域輔導教師培訓課程及其實施成效。科學教育學刊,15(5),521-542。
    金鈐(2006)。中學數學教師專業發展指標之研究-子計畫五:中學數學教師後設認知專業發展指標之研究(1/3)。國立台灣師範大學數學系,台北市。
    金鈐(2007)。中學數學教師專業發展指標之研究-子計畫五:中學數學教師後設認知專業發展指標之研究(2/3)。國立台灣師範大學數學系,台北市。
    金鈐、王安蘭(2006)。高中機率概念的直觀教學。國立台灣師範大學學報:科學教育類,51(1,2),15-54。
    唐韶玲(2002)。實習教師在不同學校社群文化與不同實習輔導理念下之專業成長研究。國立台灣師範大學碩士論文,台北市。
    張繼元(2005)。六位學生數學教師教學價值認同的個案研究。國立台灣師範大學碩士論文,台北市。
    教育部(2003)。高級中等以下學校及幼稚園教師資格檢定及教育實習辦法。2003年8月27日,取自http://law.moj.gov.tw。
    教育部(2005)。師資培育法。2005年12月28日,取自http://law.moj.gov.tw。
    梁瑞安(1999)。實習教師對輔導教師的角色期望初探。中等教育,50(5),26-38。
    許秀玲(2007)。六位數學實習教師教學知識變遷的個案研究。國立台灣師範大學碩士論文,台北市。
    許秀聰(2004)。一位資深高中數學教師重構教學概念的行動研究。國立台灣師範大學碩士論文,台北市。
    黃光雄(主譯) (2005)。R.C. Bogden及S.K. Biklen著。質性教育研究理論與方法(Qualitative Research For Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods) (3rd Ed.)。台北市:濤石。
    黃芳裕(2001)。追求自我實現-教育實習的實現。國立台灣師範大學實習輔導處實習輔導組:新世紀實習輔導論文集,329-340。台北市。
    黃炳煌(1981)。師範院校教育實習之探討。台灣教育,372,7-18。
    黃凱旻、金鈐(2003)。一個輔導中學數學實習教師教學概念轉變的行動研究。國立台灣師範大學學報:科學教育類,48 (1),21-44。
    黃嘉雄(1997)。從「Mentor」論實習輔導教師之角色。國民教育,4(37),23-27。
    黎立夫(2005)。一位實習教師受實習輔導專業成長團體之輔導教師協助下之教學佈題。國立新竹教育大學碩士論文,新竹市。

    二、英文部分

    Argyris, C., & Scho ̈n, D.A. (1974). Theory into Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Balacheff, N. (1987). Towards a problematique for Research on mathematics teaching. Research Presession of the 56th Annual Meeting of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
    Ball, D.L., & Bass, H. (2000). Interweaving content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach: Knowing and using mathematics. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple Perspectives on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 83-104). London: Ablex Publishing.
    Ball, D.L., Lubienski, S.T., & Mewborn, D.S. (2001). Research on teaching mathematics: The unsolved problem of teachers’ mathematical knowledge. In Virginia, Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (4th ed. pp. 433-455). Washington, D.C.: AREA.
    Brousseau, G. (1986). Fondements et methods de la didactique des mathematics. Researcher on Didactique des Mathematiques 7, 33-115.
    Brousseau, G. (1987). Les different roles du maitre. Colloque des P.E.N. , Angers.
    Brown, J.S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
    Burden, P.R. (1990). Teacher development. In W.R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education: A project of the association of the teacher education. New York: Macmillan.
    Calderhead, J. (1987). The quality of reflection in student teachers’ professional learning. European Journal of Teacher Education, 10, 3.
    Clandinin, D.J. (1985). Personal practical knowledge: A study of teachers’ classroom images. Curriculum Inquiry, 15, 361-385.
    Clark, C.M., & Peterson, P.L. (1986). Teachers’ thought processes. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 255-296). New York: Macmillan.
    Clark, C.M., & Yinger, R.J. (1978). Research on teaching thinking (Research Series No. 12). East Lansing, MI: Institute for Research on Teaching.
    Cooney, T. (1994). Teacher education as an exercise in adaption. In D. B. Aichele & A. F. Coxford (Eds.), Professional development for teachers of mathematics: 1994 yearbook. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
    Cooney, T., Shealy, B.E., & Arvold, B (1998). Conceptualizing belief structures of preservice secondary mathematics teachers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(3), 306-333.
    Daloz, L. (1986). Effective Teaching and Mentoring. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
    Dewey, J. (1910). How We Think? London: D.C. Heath.
    Eisenhart, M., Behm, L., & Riomagnano, L.(1991). Learning to teach: Developing expertise or rite of passage? Journal of Education for teaching, 7, 1.
    Elbaz, F. (1983). Teaching thinking: A study of practical knowledge. New York: Nichols.
    Elliot, B., & Calderhead, J. (1993). Mentoring for teacher development: Possibilities and caveats. In D. McIntyre, H. Hagger & M. Wilkin (Eds.), Mentoring: perspectives on school- based teacher education. London; Philadelphia: Kogan Page, 166-190.
    Feiman-Nemser, S., & Buchmann, M.(1987). When is student teaching teacher education? Teacher and Teacher Education 3, 257-273.
    Fennema, E., & Franke, M.L. (1992). Teachers’ knowledge and its impact. In A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 147-164), NY: Macmillan.
    Fennema, E., Carpenter, T.P., & Peterson, P.L. (1989). Teachers’ decision making and cognitively guided instruction: A new paradigm for curriculum development. In K. Clements & N.F. Ellerton (Eds.), Facilitating change in mathematics education. Geelong, Victoria, Australia: Deakin University Press.
    Fuller, F., & Bown, O. (1975). Becoming a teacher. In Ryan, K. (Ed.), Teacher Education, 74th YearBook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    Furlong, J., & Maynard, T. (1995). Mentoring student teachers. The growth of professional knowledge. London: Routledge.
    Guillaume, A., & Rudeny, G. (1993). Student teachers’ growth towards independence: An analysis of their changing concerns. Teaching and Teacher Education, 9(1): 65-80.
    Hollingsworth, S. (1989). Prior beliefs and cognitive change in learning to teach. American Educational Research Journal, 26(2): 160-189
    Jaworski, B. (1992). Mathematics teaching: What is it? For the Learning of Mathematics, 12(1), 8-14.
    Jaworski, B. (1994). Investigating mathematics teaching: A constructivist enquiry. London: The Falmer Press.
    Jaworski, B. (2001). Developing mathematics teaching: Teachers, teacher educators, and researchers as co-learners. In F.-L. Lin, & T.J. Cooney (Eds.), Making Sense of Mathematics Teacher Education, 295-320. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands.
    Karplus, R., Lawson, A., Wollman, W., Apple, M., Bernoff, R., Howe, A., Rusch, J., Sullivan, F. (1977). Science Teaching and the Development of Reasoning, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
    Katz, L.G. (1972). Developmental stages of pre-school teachers. The Elementary School Journal, 73(1): 50-54.
    Lacey, C. (1977). The socialization of teachers. London: Methuen.
    Lawlor, C. (1990). Teachers Mistaught, London: Centre for Policy Studies.
    Leinhardt G., & Greeno, J.C. (1986). The cognitive skill of teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2, 75-95.
    Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Maynard, T., & Furlong, J. (1993). Learning to teach and models of mentoring. In D. McIntyre, H. Hagger, M. Wilkin (Eds.),Mentoring: Perspectives on school-based teacher education. London; Philadelphia: Kogan Page.
    McIntyre, D., & Hagger, H. (1993). Teachers’ expertise and models of mentoring. In D. McIntyre, H. Hagger & M. Wilkin (Eds.), Mentoring: perspectives on school- based teacher education (pp. 86-102). London; Philadelphia: Kogan Page.
    O’Hear, A. (1988). Who Teachers the Teachers? London: Social Affairs Unit.
    Peterson, P.L. (1988). Teachers’ and students’ cognitional knowledge for classroom teaching and learning. Educational Researcher, 17(5), 5-14.
    Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Psathas, G. (1973). Phenomenological sociology. New York: Wiley.
    Putnam, R.T., & Leinhardt, G. (1986). Curriculum scripts and the adjustment of content in mathematics lessons. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
    Romberg, T., & Carpenter, T. (1986). Research on teaching and learning mathematics: Two disciplines of scientific inquiry. In M. Wittrock (Ed.). Handbook of research on teaching (3 ed. pp. 850-873). New York: Macmillan.
    Russell, T. (1998). From pre-service teacher education to first year of teaching: A study of theory and practice, in J. Calderhead (Ed.), Teachers’ professional learning. London: The Falmer Press.
    Scho ̈n, D. (1987). Educating the Reflective Practitioner, San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
    Schwab, J.J. (1978). Science, curriculum and liberal education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Shavelson, R.J., & Stern, P. (1981). Research on teachers’ pedagogical thoughts, judgments, decisions, and behavior. Review of Educational Research, 51, 455-498.
    Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand : Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Research, 15(2), 4-14.
    Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-23.
    Simon, M. (1994). Learning mathematics and learning to teach: Learning cycles in mathematics teacher education. Educational studies in Mathematics, 26, 71-94.
    Simon, M. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26 (2), 114-145.
    Simon, M., & Tzur, R. (1999). Explicating the teacher’s perspective from the researchers’ perspectives: Generating accounts of mathematics teachers’ practice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30 (3), 252-264.
    Steinbring, H. (1998). Elements of epistemological for mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1(2), 157-189.
    Tomlinson, P. (1995). Learning teaching: a framework for understanding mentoring. Understanding Mentoring: reflective strategies for school-based teacher preparation, 8-27. London: Open University Press.
    Tzur, R. (2001). Becoming a mathematics teacher-educator: Conceptualizing the terrain through self-reflective analysis. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 4, 259-283.
    Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice-learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Wilson, S.M., Shulman, L.S., & Richert, A. (1987). ‘’ 150 different ways of knowing’’: Representations of knowledge in teaching. In J. Calderhead (Ed.). Exploring teacher thinking (pp. 104-124). Sussex. UK: Holt, Rinchart and Winston.
    Zaslavsky, O., & Leikin, R. (1999). Interweaving the training of mathematics teacher-educators and the professional development of mathematics teachers. In O. Zaslavsky (Ed.), Proceedings of the 23rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, v.1 (pp. 143-158).
    Zaslavsky, O., & Leikin, R. (2004). Professional development of mathematics teacher educators: Growth through practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7, 5-32.
    Zaslavsky, O., Chapman, O., & Leikin, R. (2003). Professional development in mathematics education: Trends and tasks. In A.J. Bishop, M.A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick & F.K.S. Leung (Eds.), Second International Handbook of Mathematics Education (pp. 875-915). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    Zeichner, K., & Liston, D. (1987). Teaching student teachers to reflect. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1.

    QR CODE