本論文旨在探討綠色消費行為下的現狀偏誤行為，並著重於過程流暢性和擷取流暢性在消費者綠色消費決策中的影響，以及共鳴感在其中的調節效果。現存文獻強調資訊處理和動機對現狀偏誤的重要作用，然而，尚未有研究將其與資訊處裡的流暢性做連結。因此，本文提出兩個可能的原因來解釋它。第一，高流暢性可能會增加消費者維持現狀的傾向，低流暢性可能會增加消費者改變現狀的傾向。第二，共鳴感可能會增強或削弱流暢性對現狀偏誤的影響，其調節了消費者綠色消費決策的影響。因此，本研究設計了兩個實驗來檢驗這些假設。

實驗結果表明，在綠色消費決策下，高流暢性的消費者更傾向於選擇維持現狀，而低流暢性的消費者更傾向於採取行動。此外，共鳴感在流暢性與現狀偏誤之間扮演調節角色，使流暢性對現狀偏誤的影響有所變化。綜上所述，這些研究結果為我們深入了解綠色消費行為下的現狀偏誤行為，這對於擴大綠色消費市場、推動更多消費者產生綠色消費行為有重大貢獻。未來在理論和行銷中可以應用這些結果，利用不同流暢性及高共鳴感的資訊內容引導既有及潛在的消費者持續使用或向綠色產品轉變。

This paper aims to investigate the status quo bias in green consumer behavior, with a particular emphasis on the impact of processing fluency and retrieval fluency on consumers' green consumption decisions, along with the moderating effect of resonance. Existing literature underscores the significance of information processing and motivation in relation to status quo bias; however, a link between these factors and the fluency of information processing remains unexplored. Thus, this study proposes two potential explanations. Firstly, high fluency might increase consumers' inclination to maintain the status quo, whereas low fluency could enhance their tendency to enact change. Secondly, resonance may amplify or attenuate the influence of fluency on status quo bias, thereby moderating the impact of consumers' green consumption decisions. Consequently, two experiments were designed to examine these hypotheses.

The experimental findings indicate that in the context of green consumption decisions, consumers with high fluency are more inclined to maintain the status quo, whereas those with low fluency are more inclined to take action. Furthermore, resonance plays a moderating role between fluency and status quo bias, leading to variations in the impact of fluency on status quo bias. To summarize, these research outcomes make a significant contribution to a deeper understanding of status quo bias in the realm of green consumer behavior. This contribution holds substantial potential for expanding the green consumption market and fostering more green consumer behavior. In the future, the application of these findings in both theoretical and marketing contexts can facilitate more effective utilization of diverse levels of fluency and high resonance content to guide both existing and potential consumers towards sustained usage or transitioning to green products.

Anderson, C. J. (2003). The psychology of doing nothing: forms of decision avoidance result from reason and emotion. Psychological bulletin, 129(1), 139.
Andreani, F., Gunawan, L., & Haryono, S. (2021). Social media influencer, brand awareness, and purchase decision among generation z in Surabaya. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Kewirausahaan, 23(1), 18-26.
Biswas, A., & Roy, M. (2015). Leveraging factors for sustained green consumption behavior based on consumption value perceptions: testing the structural model. Journal of Cleaner production, 95, 332-340.
Bornemann, T., & Homburg, C. (2011). Psychological distance and the dual role of price. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(3), 490-504.
Bray, J., Johns, N., & Kilburn, D. (2011). An exploratory study into the factors impeding ethical consumption. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(4), 597–608.
Chaiken, S., (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of personality and social psychology, 39, 752-766.
Chang, C. J. (2013). Price or quality? The influence of fluency on the dual role of price. Marketing Letters, 24(4), 369-380.
Chang, C. J. (2018). The different impact of fluency and disfluency on online group-buying conforming behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 85, 15-22.
Chavez, E. (2011). The change equation: A correlation study of status quo bias in managers (Doctoral dissertation, University of Phoenix).
Chernev, A. (2004). Goal orientation and consumer preference for the status quo. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 557-565.
Cohen, J. (1988). edition 2. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences.
Dangelico, R. M., & Pontrandolfo, P. (2010). From green product definitions and classifications to the Green Option Matrix. Journal of cleaner production, 18(16-17), 1608-1628.
Dimock, W. C. (1997). A theory of resonance. pmla, 112(5), 1060-1071.
Douglas, M. (2002). Purity and danger: An analysis of concept of pollution and taboo (Vol. 2). Psychology Press.
Douglas, M. (2004). Natural symbols: Explorations in cosmology. Routledge.
Echegaray, F., & Hansstein, F. V. (2017). Assessing the intention-behavior gap in electronic waste recycling: the case of Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 180-190.
Fukawa, N., & Niedrich, R. W. (2015). A fluency heuristic account of supraliminal prime effects on product preference. Psychology & Marketing, 32(11), 1061-1078.
Giorgi, S. (2017). The mind and heart of resonance: The role of cognition and emotions in frame effectiveness. Journal of Management Studies, 54(5), 711-738.
Gleim, M. R., Smith, J. S., Andrews, D., & Cronin Jr, J. J. (2013). Against the green: A multi-method examination of the barriers to green consumption. Journal of retailing, 89(1), 44-61.
Gu, S., Xie, M., & Zhang, X. (2019). Green Transformation and Development. Palgrave Macmillan.
Gupta, S., & Ogden, D. T. (2009). To buy or not to buy? A social dilemma perspective on green buying. Journal of consumer marketing, 26(6), 376-391.
Haws, K. L., Winterich, K. P., & Naylor, R. W. (2014). Seeing the world through GREEN-tinted glasses: Green consumption values and responses to environmentally friendly products. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(3), 336-354.
Hoek, A. C., Pearson, D., James, S. W., Lawrence, M. A., & Friel, S. (2017). Healthy and environmentally sustainable food choices: Consumer responses to point-of-purchase actions. Food quality and preference, 58, 94-106.
Hsieh, P. J. (2016). An empirical investigation of patients’ acceptance and resistance toward the health cloud: The dual factor perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 959-969.
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1991). Anomalies: The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 193-206.
Kahneman, D., Tversky, A. (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
Khedhaouria, A., Thurik, R., Gurau, C., & Van Heck, E. (2016). Customers' continuance intention regarding mobile service providers: A status quo bias perspective. Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM), 24(4), 1-21.
Kim, H. W., & Gupta, S. (2012). Investigating customer resistance to change in transaction relationship with an Internet vendor. Psychology & Marketing, 29(4), 257-269.
Kim, H. W., & Kankanhalli, A. (2009). Investigating user resistance to information systems implementation: a status quo bias perspective. MIS quarterly, 567-582.
Leiserowitz, A. (2006). Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: The role of affect, imagery, and values. Climatic change, 77(1-2), 45-72.
Li, J., Liu, M., & Liu, X. (2016). Why do employees resist knowledge management systems? An empirical study from the status quo bias and inertia perspectives. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 189-200.
McCammon, H. (2009). Beyond frame resonance: The argumentative structure and persuasive capacity of twentieth-century US women's jury-rights frames. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 14(1), 45-64.
McDonnell, T. E., Bail, C. A., & Tavory, I. (2017). A theory of resonance. Sociological Theory, 35(1), 1-14.
Muthukrishnan, A. V. (1995). Decision ambiguity and incumbent brand advantage. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(1), 98-109.
Muthukrishnan, A. V., & Wathieu, L. (2007). Superfluous choices and the persistence of preference. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(4), 454-460.
Novemsky, N., Dhar, R., Schwarz, N., & Simonson, I. (2007). Preference fluency in choice. Journal of marketing research, 44(3), 347-356.
Pagiaslis, A., & Krontalis, A. K. (2014). Green consumption behavior antecedents: Environmental concern, knowledge, and beliefs. Psychology & Marketing, 31(5), 335-348.
Peattie, K. (2010). Green consumption: behavior and norms. Annual review of environment and resources, 35, 195-228.
Raska, D., Nichols, B. S., & Shaw, D. (2015). When descriptive norm cues fail as persuasion agents in green supermarket advertising. Journal of Promotion Management, 21(6), 721-738.
Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1988). Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of risk and uncertainty, 1, 7-59.
Schubert, I., de Groot, J. I., & Newton, A. C. (2021). Challenging the Status Quo through social influence: changes in sustainable consumption through the influence of social networks. Sustainability, 13(10), 5513.
Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(3), 512–523.
Shang, S. S., Wu, Y. L., & Sie, Y. J. (2017). Generating consumer resonance for purchase intention on social network sites. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 18-28.
Shrum, L. J., McCarty, J. A., & Lowrey, T. M. (1995). Buyer characteristics of the green consumer and their implications for advertising strategy. Journal of advertising, 24(2), 71-82.
Sokolova, T., & Krishna, A. (2016). Take it or leave it: How choosing versus rejecting alternatives affects information processing. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(4), 614-635.
Suri, G., Sheppes, G., Schwartz, C., & Gross, J. J. (2013). Patient Inertia and the Status Quo Bias When an Inferior Option Is Preferred. Psychological science, 24(9), 1763-1769.
Suri, R., & Monroe, K. B. (2003). The effects of time constraints on consumers' judgments of prices and products. Journal of consumer research, 30(1), 92-104.
Sweeney, J. C., & Soutar, G. N. (2001). Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale. Journal of retailing, 77(2), 203-220.
Tan, L. P., Johnstone, M. L., & Yang, L. (2016). Barriers to green consumption behaviours: The roles of consumers’ green perceptions. Australasian Marketing Journal, 24(4), 288-299.
Testa, F., Pretner, G., Iovino, R., Bianchi, G., Tessitore, S., & Iraldo, F. (2021). Drivers to green consumption: A systematic review. Environment, development and sustainability, 23, 4826-4880.
Tsai, C. I., & McGill, A. L. (2011). No pain, no gain? How fluency and construal level affect consumer confidence. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 807-821.
Tsai, C. I., & Thomas, M. (2011). When does feeling of fluency matter? How abstract and concrete thinking influence fluency effect. Psychological Science, 22, 348-354.
Walasek, L., & Stewart, N. (2015). How to make loss aversion disappear and reverse: Tests of the decision by sampling origin of loss aversion. Journal of experimental psychology: general, 144(1), 7.
Wan, H. H. (2008). Resonance as a mediating factor accounting for the message effect in tailored communication—Examining crisis communication in a tourism context. Journal of Communication, 58(3), 472-489.
Yen, H. R., & Chuang, S. C. (2008). The effect of incidental affect on preference for the status quo. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36, 522-537.