簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 孫瑋廷
Wei-Ting, Sun
論文名稱: 體制理論下的創業家精神 - 以台灣麥當勞為例
Entrepreneurship in the Franchise Institution - the Case of Taiwan McDoanld's
指導教授: 葉俶禎
Yeh, Chu-Chen
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 國際人力資源發展研究所
Graduate Institute of International Human Resource Developmemt
論文出版年: 2013
畢業學年度: 101
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 103
中文關鍵詞: 體制理論創業家精神連鎖加盟加盟創業家
英文關鍵詞: Institutional Theory, Entrepreneurship, Franchise, Frantrepreneur
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:154下載:11
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 加盟系統在全世界被廣泛使用,並且有些加盟系統在市場上是非常知名的。在加盟總部嚴格的規定下,加盟店的營運方式跟直營店相同。然而,既然加盟店店主較直營店店經理有較高的創業家精神,探索加盟店店主如何在體制化的加盟環境下表現,就是一件有趣的事。
    本研究採取質化研究方法去探索加盟體制下的創業家精神。本研究將體制理論、加盟系統以及創業家精神的相關文獻作為理論基礎。研究者訪談台灣麥當勞的加盟者,以獲取他們的營運資訊。質化資料的分析致力於發現加盟店與麥當勞制度的不同處、不同從何而來、以及加盟者如何看待這些不同。
    本研究發覺許多加盟店與麥當勞制度的不同處,並提出5個論點。研究顯示加盟者確實遵守加盟總部規定、對待員工有如家人、追求利潤、重視社區關係以及擁有較高之自主性。也就是說,在加盟體制下,加盟者們表現得更像個『加盟創業家』。

    Franchise system is widely used and some franchises are very well-known in the market. Some franchise stores are under strict regulations of the headquarters to operate exactly the same way as the direct-management stores. However, since the franchise stores are run by the franchisees who are business owners that may possess a higher degree of entrepreneurship than managers of the direct-management stores, it is interesting to explore how these franchisees behave under an institutionalized franchise environment.
    This research adopted the qualitative approach to explore the issue of entrepreneurship in the franchise institution. Literatures on institutional theories, franchise systems, and entrepreneurship were reviewed. Then, the researcher conducted interviews with the franchisees of McDonald’s in Taiwan to gather information on their operation. The analysis of qualitative data focused on finding differences between the franchise stores and the McDonald’s institution, how these differences came from, and how the franchisees thought about these differences.
    The research found many differences between franchise stores and the McDonald’s institution, and concluded with 5 propositions. The research showed that although these franchisees did follow the regulations of the headquarter, they treated employees more like family members, placed heavy emphasis on profit, valued local community relationship, and had higher autonomy on business plans and store management. That is, these store owners acted more like “frantrepreneures” when operating under the franchise institution.

    Abstract....................................I Table of Contents..........................III List of Tables..............................V List of Figures............................VII CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION.....................1 Background of the Study.....................1 Statement of the Problems...............3 Research Purpose........................4 Research Question.......................4 Significance of the Research............5 Chapter II LITERATURE REVIEW...............7 Franchise...............................7 Institutional Theory ...................8 Isomorphism............................11 McDonald’s............................14 Entrepreneurship.......................17 Frantrepreneur.........................21 CHAPTER III METHODOLOGY...................23 Research Framework.....................23 Research Procedure.....................25 Research Methods.......................26 Sampling Criteria......................26 Research Participants..................27 Data Collection........................29 Instrument.............................30 Data Analysis..........................33 Research Quality.......................35 Coding Scheme..........................36 CHAPTER IV FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION........39 Entrepreneur Aptitude Scale............39 Franchise Contract.....................41 Managerial Function....................43 Business Function......................56 Personal Value.........................70 Discussion.............................78 CHAPTER V CONCLUSIONS.....................86 Conclusion.............................86 Additional Finding.....................89 Implication............................89 Limitation.............................91 Future Research Suggestion.............92 REFERENCES.................................94 APPENDIX A: INTERVIEW QUESTIONNAIRE........97 APPENDIX B: EXAMPLE OF CONTEXT CODING.....100 APPENDIX C: EXAMPLE OF DIMENSION CODING...101 APPENDIX D: EXAMPLE OF CONCLUSION CODING..102 APPENDIX E: EXAMPLE OF PROPOSITION........103

    Andreas, R., & Michael, F.(2007). Let’s put the person back into entrepreneurship research: A meta-analysis on the relationship between business owners’ personality traits, business creation, and success. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology,16(4),353-385.
    Arnold, C. C., & William, C. D.(1986). Entrepreneurship and paths to business ownership. Strategic Management Journal, 7, 53-68
    Aldrich, H. E.(2005). Entrepreneurship. In N. Smelser, & R. Swedberg (Eds.), Handbook of economic sociology (pp.1-477). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    Brockhaus, R. H.(1981). Entrepreneurship folklore. Journal of Small Business Management, 25(3), 1-6.
    Busenitz, L. W., West, G. P., Shepherd, D., Nelson, T., Chandler, G. N., & Zacharakis, A.(2003). Entrepreneurship research in emergence: Past and future directions. Journal of Management,29(3), 285-308.
    Covin, J. G., Slevin, D. P., & Schultz, R. L.(1994). Implementing strategic missions: Effective strategic, structural and tactical choices. The Journal of Management Studies, 31(4), 481-505.
    Delmar, E., & Davidsson, P. (2000). Where do they come from? Prevalence and characteristics of nascent entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 12(1). 1-23.
    DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
    DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1991). Introduction. In P. J. DiMaggio, & W. W. Powell (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp.1-38). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Eckhardt, J. T., & Shane, S. A. (2003). Opportunities and entrepreneurship. Journal of Management, 29(3), 333–349.
    Gartner, W. B. (1988). Who is an entrepreneur? Is the wrong question. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 13(4), 47‐68.
    Heugens, P. P., & Lauder, M. W. (2009). Structure! Agency! A meta-analysis of institutional theories of organization. Academy of Management Journal. 52(1), 61-85.
    International Franchise Association. Retrieved from
    http://www.franchise.org
    Low, M. R., & Abrahamson, E. (1997). Movements, bandwagons, and clones: Industry evolution and the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, 12, 435–457.
    Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarify the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135-172.
    Katz, J., & Gartner, W. (1988). Properties of emerging organizations. Academy of Management Review, 13, 429–441.
    March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. New York: Free Press.
    McDonald’s Corporation. Retrieved April 3, 2011, from
    http://www.aboutmcdonalds.com/mcd/franchising.html
    Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363.
    Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic response to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16, 145-179.
    Pitt, L. F., and Kannemeyer, R. (2000). The role of adaptation in microenterprise development: A marketing perspective. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 5(2), 137-155.
    Roth, T. K., & Dacin, M. T.(2008). Institutional theory in the study of multinational corporations: A critique and new directions. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 994-1006.
    Scott, W. R. (1992). Organizations: Rational, Natural and Open System. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
    Scott, W. R. (2001). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
    Selnick, P. (1949). TVA and the grass roots: A study in the sociology of formal organization. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Journal, 25(1), 217–226.
    Shapero, A. (1984). The entrepreneurial event. In C. Kent (Ed.), The Environment for Entrepreneurship (pp.21–39). Toronto: Lexington Books.
    Sharma, P. & Chrisman, J. (1999). Toward a reconciliation of the definitional issues in the field of corporate entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(3), 11-27.
    Silverman, D. (1971). The theory of organizations: A sociologic framework. New York: Basic Books.
    Smith, R. A. (2003). Frantrepreneur. Franchising World, 35(1), 22-23
    Stinchcombe, A. L. (1968). Constructing social theories. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Stewart, W. H., & Roth, P. L. (2001). Risk propensity differences between entrepreneurs and managers: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 145 – 153.
    Sundbo, J., Johnston, R., Mattsson, J., & Millett, B. (2001). Innovation in service internationalization: The crucial role of the frantrepreneur. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 13, 247-267.
    Támasy, C. (2006). Determinants of regional entrepreneurship dynamics in contemporary Germany: A conceptual and empirical analysis. Regional Studies, 40 (4), 365-384.
    Venkataraman, S. (1997). The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research. In J Katz (Ed.), Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth (pp. 19–138). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
    Westhead, P., & Wright, M. (1998). Novice, portfolio, and serial founders: Are they different? Journal of Business Venturing, 13(3), 173-204.
    Wright, M., Westhead, P., & Sohl, J. (1998). Habitual entrepreneurs and angel investors. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 22(4), 5-21.
    Wu, I. H, & Chen, C. S. (2004). An empirical study on the construction of chinese entrepreneur aptitude scale. Paper presented at the meeting of Industrial Technology Research Institute, Taipei, Taiwan. [text in Chinese]
    Wu, I. H, & Chen, C. S. (2007). An exploratory study of chinese entrepreneur’s characteristics. Journal of Entrepreneurship Research, 2(1), 1-30.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE