簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 黃宜婷
HUANG YI-TING
論文名稱: 導師利社會行為與學生關係攻擊行為之相關性研究
The associations among the prosocial behavior of the teachers and relationally aggressive behavior of the students at junior high schools.
指導教授: 程景琳
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 教育心理與輔導學系
Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling
論文出版年: 2013
畢業學年度: 102
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 98
中文關鍵詞: 利社會行為關係攻擊
英文關鍵詞: prosocial behavior, relational aggression
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:274下載:16
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

本研究旨在探討國中階段導師利社會行為、學生利社會行為,及學生關係攻擊行為的關係。本研究採用便利取樣,以新北市、台北市及桃園縣的6所國中,不分年級,共13個班級學生及該班導師為研究對象,總計有效樣本有363名學生及13名導師。
本研究藉由問卷調查法進行研究資料蒐集,所使用的問卷包含班級學生填寫的「青少年人際互動問卷」及班級導師填寫的「教師利他行為問卷」。「青少年人際互動問卷」包括兩大部分,第一部分是自我評量,題目涉及學生評量導師利社會行為、自己的利社會行為及自己的關係攻擊行為;第二部分則是同儕評量,每位學生評定該班同性別的其他學生之利社會行為及關係攻擊行為。「教師利他行為問卷」則是由該班導師自我評量利社會行為表現。
資料處理方式以Pearson's積差相關進行檢驗,以瞭解各變項之間的關聯性,若三者間皆達顯著相關,則用階層迴歸分析了解學生利社會行為是否為中介因子。結果發現:
一、學生評量導師的利社會行為與學生自陳的利社會行為有低度正相關。
二、學生自陳的利社會行為與同儕評量的關係攻擊行為有低度正相關。
三、導師利社會行為和學生關係攻擊行為中,不論是自陳或是他人評量所得之資料,均無顯著相關。
四、本研究假設的中介變項─學生的利社會行為,並無中介效果存在。
最後,研究者依據研究結果提出對未來研究及教育現場上的應用提出建議。

The purpose of the study was to examine the associations among the prosocial behavior of the teachers, the prosocial behavior and relationally aggressive behavior of the students at junior high schools. The participants consisted of 363 students and 13 teachers from 13 classrooms of 6 schools at New Taipei City, Taipei City, and Taoyuan County.
The measurement used in this study included Teenager’s Interpersonal Interaction Scale reported by the students, and Teacher’s Prosocial Behavior Scale reported by the teachers. Teenager’s Interpersonal Interaction Scale included two parts, one was self-reported scale consisted of students’ perceived prosocial behavior of teachers, students’ own prosocial behavior and relationally aggressive behavior. Another part was peer rating, for students to measure their classmates of same gender in terms of prosocial behavior and relational aggression. Teacher’s Prosocial Behavior Scale reported by teachers regarding their own prosocial behavior.
The main findings were as follows:
1.Teachers’ prosocial behavior reported by students had a significantly low positive association with students’ self-reported prosocial behavior.
2.Students’ self-reported prosocial behavior had a significantly low positive association with students’ peer-rated relational aggression.
3.There was no significant correlations between teachers’ prosocial behavior and students’ relational aggression.
4.There was no mediating effect for the variable of students’ prosocial behavior.
Finally, based on the findings, educational implications and suggestions for future study were proposed.

誌謝詞………………………………………………………………………………i 中文摘要……………………………………………………………………………iii 英文摘要……………………………………………………………………………v 目次…………………………………………………………………………………vii 表次…………………………………………………………………………………ix 圖次…………………………………………………………………………………xi 第一章 緒論………………………………………………………………………1 第一節 研究動機目的……………………………………………………………1 第二節 名詞釋義…………………………………………………………………4 第二章 文獻探討…………………………………………………………………7 第一節 利社會行為相關文獻……………………………………………………7 第二節 關係攻擊行為相關文獻…………………………………………………15 第三節 利社會行為與關係攻擊之關聯性………………………………………31 第四節 研究問題與假設…………………………………………………………35 第三章 研究方法…………………………………………………………………37 第一節 研究架構…………………………………………………………………37 第二節 研究對象…………………………………………………………………38 第三節 研究工具…………………………………………………………………39 第四節 研究程序…………………………………………………………………47 第五節 資料處理與分析…………………………………………………………48 第四章 研究結果…………………………………………………………………51 第一節 描述性統計結果…………………………………………………………51 第二節 利社會行為與關係攻擊行為相關分析結果……………………………51 第三節 學生利社會行為為導師利社會行為與學生關係攻擊行為之中介分析結果……………………………………………………………………………………53 第五章 討論………………………………………………………………………57 第一節 研究結果與討論…………………………………………………………57 第二節 研究限制、建議與貢獻…………………………………………………65 參考文獻……………………………………………………………………………71 中文部分……………………………………………………………………………71 西文部分……………………………………………………………………………75 附錄…………………………………………………………………………………87 附錄一 研究工具使用同意書……………………………………………………87 附錄二 施測老師指導說明………………………………………………………89 附錄三 青少年人際互動問卷……………………………………………………91 附錄四 教師利他行為問卷………………………………………………………97

中文部分
王明傳、雷庚玲(2007)。青少年前期的間接攻擊行為:同儕估計法的建構效度。中華心理學刊,49(2),205-224。
王明傳、雷庚玲(2008)。華人青少年前期兒童之間接攻擊行爲的反應評鑑與情緒經驗,中華心理學刊,5071-90。
王明傳(2010)。青少年前期兒童的同儕間接攻擊之受害經驗與反應評鑑。台灣大學心理學研究所博士論文。
王孜甯、程景琳(2010)。「情境式關係攻擊量表」之發展。測驗學刊,57(3),345-370。
皮玉鳳(1989)。生氣控制訓練對國小高攻擊性兒童輔導效果研究。國立台灣師範大學心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
江麗珠(2006)。高雄市國小學童內外控信念、情緒智力與利社會行為之相關研究。國立屏東教育大學碩士論文。
何雅婷(2010)。CSCH情意課程對促進國小資優學生利社會行為之質性研究。臺北市立教育大學碩士論文。
汪佳玲、張嘉紓(2008)。以社會學習理論提升幼兒脾氣控制技巧之個案研究。國立屏東美和技術學院主辦「2008南台灣幼兒保育學術研討會」宣讀之論文(屏東)。
吳瑛(2007)。國小學童親子關係、制握信念與利社會行為之相關研究。國立嘉義大學碩士論文。
吳明燁(1998)。青少年初期父親與母親管教行為之比較。東吳社會學報,7,39-79。
李國勝(2004)。國中導師領導行為、班級氣氛與班級經營效能關係之研究。國立彰化師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
林君徽(2006)。國小高年級學童間接攻擊與自我概念之探究。臺灣師範大學人類發展與家庭教育研究所碩士論文。
林芸醇(2010)。國小學童知覺教師管教方式、班級氣氛與利社會行為表現關係研究。臺北市立教育大學碩士論文。
林苡彤、程景琳(2010)。國中生關係攻擊加害者與受害者之規範信念、同理心與因應策略。台東大學教育學報,21(2),1-28。
林淑菁(2005)。國小高年級學生的關係攻擊及外顯性攻擊與其友誼關係之研究。台中師範學院諮商與教育心理研究所碩士論文。
邱皓政(2009)。量化研究與統計分析 SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析(第三版)。台北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
張春興(2004)。張氏心理學辭典。台北:東華。
陳若芝(2010)。國中生自尊情緒智能與利社會行為之相關研究。國立臺灣師範大學碩士論文。
莊季靜(2006)。國中學生同儕攻擊者之社會訊息處理歷程研究。台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
梁茂森、陳李綢(2000)。教育大辭書。取自國家教育研究院網站:http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1309940/, 2000年12月。
粘絢雯、程景琳(2010)。國中班級經營與班級氣氛相關因素之探討:關係攻擊與關係受害。教育實踐與研究,23(1),57-84。
許舒雅(2007)。國小學童父母親依附關係、利社會行為與友誼品質之關係研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系在職進修碩士論文。
程景琳(2010)。社交計量及同儕知覺受歡迎度與青少年關係攻擊及孤寂感之相關研究。教育心理學報,42(1),143-162。
黃心怡、程景琳(2009)。國中生關係攻擊受害經驗與心理社會適應之關係:友誼品質的角色。國立台灣大學主辦「台灣心理學會第48屆年會暨『心理學在台灣的發展回顧與前瞻』專題研討會」宣讀之論(臺北市)。
黃德祥(1994)。青少年發展與輔導。臺北市:五南。
楊惠婷(2005)。國小兒童同儕關係與自我概念、利社會行為表現之相關研究。國立屏東師範學院教育行政研究所碩士論文。
郭怡汎(2004)。屏東縣市國小普通班學童自我概念與利社會行為之相關研究。國立屏東師範學院碩士論文。
郭明德(2008)。正面管教法:建構正向師生關係之有效策略。教師天地,155,78-84。
葉肅科(2007)。社會心理學。臺北市:洪葉。
廖俐媛(2013)。導師霸凌控握信念、處理方式對國中生校園霸凌加害行為影響之跨層次研究。輔仁大學公共衛生學系碩士論文。
蔡欣虹(2007)。國民小學級任教師轉型領導與學童利社會行為之相關研究。國立屏東教育大學碩士論文。
蔡欣芹(2008)。高雄市國小學生知覺教師正面管教策略與利社會行為關係之研究。國立屏東教育大學社會發展學系碩士論文。
蔡宜靜(2012)。當胖虎遇到大雄時!國中生社會技巧、導師領導風格對校園霸凌行為經驗之相關研究—以台中市某國中為例。國立彰化師範大學碩士論文。
鄧明宇、李介至、鄭凰君(2007)。心理學概論。台北縣中和市:新文京開發。
簡嘉盈、程景琳(2012)。同儕對高中生之利社會行為的影響:檢視同理心與友誼特性之調節角色。教育科學期刊,11(1),105-123。
鄭麗鳳(2003)。國中學生內外控信念與利社會行為之相關研究。國立臺灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導學系在職進修碩士班碩士論文。
藍珮君(2006)。國中女生關係攻擊行為及意圖歸因、友誼品質、自我概念之相關研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
蘇郁惠(2009)。遭受關係攻擊與青少年社會心理適應:以社會支持為調節變項。國立交通大學教育研究所碩士論文。
羅瑞玉(1997)。國小學生的利社會行為及其相關因素之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系博士論文。
王慶福、洪光遠、程淑華、王郁茗(譯)(2007)。社會心理學。(原作者:Sharon S. Brehm, Saul Kassin, Steven Fein)。臺北市:雙葉。
梁家瑜(譯)(2009)。社會心理學(原作者:Robert A. Baron, Donn Byrne與 Nyla R. Branscombe)。臺北市:心理。
陳淑敏(譯)(2006)。社會人格發展(第五版)(原作者:David R. Shaffer)。臺北市:華騰文化。(原著出版年:2005)
陸洛、吳珮瑀、林國慶、高旭繁、翁崇修(譯)(2007)。社會心理學(原作者:Joho D. DeLamater與Daniel J. Myers)。臺北市:心理。
曾如瑩(譯)(2003)。怪女孩出列(Odd Girl Out)(原作者:R. Simmons)。臺北市:商周。
西文部分
Bandura, A., & Walters, R.H. (1963). Social learning and personality development. New York: Holt , Rinehart & Winston.
Bandura, A. (1965). Influence of models’ reinforcement contingencies on the acquisition of imitative response. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 589-595.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. New York: General Learning Press.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social-cognitive theory. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bar-Tal, D. (1976). Prosocial behavior: theory and research. New York:Halsted Press.
Barth, J. M., Dunlap, S. T., Dane, H., Lochman, J. E., & Wells, K. C. (2004). Classroom environment influences on aggression, peer relations, and academic focus. Journal of School Psychology, 42, 115-133. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2003.11.004
Batson, C. D. (1998). Altruism and prosocial behavior. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 282-316). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Berndt, T.J.(1981). Relations between Social Cognition, Nonsocial Cognition, and Social Behaviors: The Case of Friendship. In J.H. Flavell & L. Ross (Eds.), Social Cognitive Development (pp. 176-199). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Björkqvist, K. (1997). Learning aggression from models: From a social learning toward a cognitive theory of modeling. In S. Feshbach & J. Zagrdozka (Eds.), Aggression: Biological, developmental, and social perspectives (pp. 69-81). New York: Plenum Press.
Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1992). The development of direct and indirect strategies in males and females. In K. Björkqvist & P. Niemelä (Eds.), Of mice and women: Aspects of female aggression (pp. 51-64). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Björkqvist, K. (2001). Different names, same issue. Social Development, 10, 273-274.
Bogenschneider, K., Wu, M., Raffaelli, M., & Tsay, J.C. (1998). Other teens drink, but not my kid: Does parental awareness of adolescent alcohol use protect adolescents from risky consequences? Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 356-373.
Bowie, B. H. (2007). Relational Aggression, Gender, and the Developmental Process. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing, 20(2), 107-115.
Brown, B. B. (1989). The role of peer groups in adolescents adjustment to secondary school. In T. J. Berndt & G.W. Ladd (Eds.), Peer relationships in child development (pp. 188-215). New York: Wiley.
Cairns, R. B., Cairns, B. D., Neckerman, H. J., Ferguson, L. L., & Gariepy, J. L. (1989). Growth and aggression: Childhood to early adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 25, 320-330.
Carlo, G., Hausmann, A., Christiansen, S., & Randall, B. (2003). Sociocognitive and behavioral correlates of a measure of prosocial tendencies for adolescents. Journal of Early Adolescence, 23(1), 107-134.
Charles, C. M. (2004). Building classroom discipline (7th ed.). Allyn & Bacan.
Cheng, C. L. (2008). Relational aggression questionnaire-peer nomination. Unpublished instrument, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Cheng, C. L. (2009). No blood means less harm?: Relational aggression and peer rejection in adolescence. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 40(3), 511-528.
Craig, W. M. (1998). The relationship among bullying, victimization, depression, anxiety, and aggression inelementary school children. Personality and Individual Differences, 24(1), 123-130.
Craig, W. M., Henderson, K., & Murphy, J. G. (2000). Prospective teachers’ attitudes toward bullying and victimization. School Psychology International, 21, 5-21.
Crick, N.R., & Grotpeter, J.K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66(3), 710-722.
Crick, N. R. (1996). The role of overt aggression, relational aggression, and prosocial behavior in the prediction of children’s future social adjustment. Child Development, 67, 2317-2327.
Crick, N. R., & Grotpeter. J. K. (1996). Children' s treatment by peers: victims of relational and overt aggression. Development and Psychopathology, 8, 367-380.
Crick, N. R., Nelson, D. A., Morales, J. R., Cullerton-Sen, C., Casas, J. F., & Hickman, S. E. (2001). Relational victimization in Childhood and Adolescence: I hurt you through the Grapevine. In J. Juvonen & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the Vulnerable and Victimized (pp. 196-214). New York: Guilford Press.
Crick, N. R., & Nelson, D. A. (2002). Relational and physical victimization within friendships: Nobody told me there’d be friends like these. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 30, 599-607.
Dellasega, C., & Nixon, C. (2003). Girl wars: 12 strategies that will end female bullying. New York: Fireside.
Dodge, K. A. (1980). Social cognition and children's aggressive behavior. Child Development, 51, 162-170.
Dodge, K. A., & Frame, G. L. (1982). Social cognitive biases and deficits in aggressive boys. Child Development, 55, 163-173.
Edwards, C. H. (2004). Classroom discipline and management (4th ed.). NY: Hayper & Row.
Eisenberg, N. (1982). The development of prosocial behavior. New York: Academic Press.
Eisenberg, N., & Fabes, R. A. (1998). Prosocial development. In W. Damon & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, vol. 3: Social, emotional, and personality development (5th ed., pp. 701-778). New York: John Wiley.
Eisenberg, N., & Mussen, P. H. (1989). The roots of prosocial behavior in children. New York: Cambridge university press.
Engels, R. C. M. E., Knibbe, R. A., & Drop, M. J. (1999). Why do late adolescents drink at home? A study on psychological well-being, social integration and drinking context. Addiction Research, 7, 31-46.
Erath, S. A., Flanagan, K. S., & Bierman, K. L. (2008). Early adolescent school adjustment: Associations with friendship and peer victimization. Social Development, 17, 853-870.
Findlay, L. C., Girardi, A., & Coplan, R. J. (2006). Links between empathy, social behavior, and social understanding in early childhood. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 21(3), 347-359.
Goie, J. D., & Dodge, K. A. (1983). Gontinuities and changes in children's social status: A five-year longitudinal study. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 29, 261-282.
Graham, J., Marks, G., & Hansen, W. (1991). Social influence processes affecting adolescent substance use. Journal of Applied Psychology, 16 (2), 291-298.
Greenburg, M.T., Weissberg, R.P., O’Brien, M.U., Zins, J.E., Fredericks, L., Resnik, H., et al. (2003). Enhancing schoolbased prevention and youth development through coordinated social, emotional, and academic learning. American Psychologist, 58, 466- 474.
Hastings, P.D., Utendale, W.T., & Sullivan, C. (2007). The socialization of prosocial development. In J.E. Grusec, & P.D. Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of Socialization (pp. 638-664). New York: Guilford Press.
Henington C, Hughes J. N., Cavell T. A., & Thompson B. (1998). The role of relational aggression in identifying aggressive boys and girls. Journal of School Psychology, 36, 457-477.
Henry, D., Guerra, N., Husemann, R., Tolan, P., VanAcker, R., & Eron, L. (2000). Normative influences on aggression in urban elementary school classrooms. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28, 59-81.
Honing, A. S., & Wittmer, D. S. (1992). Prosocial development in child:Caring, helping, and cooperation. A bibliographic resource guide. New York: Garland Publish. , Inc.
Humphrey, L. L. (1984). Children's self-control in relation to perceived social environment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 178-188.
Jackson, M., & Tisak, M.S. (2001). Is prosocial behaviour a good thing? Developmental changes in children`s evaluations of helping, sharing, cooperating, and comforting. British Joumal of Developmental Psychology, 19, 349-367.
Jones, V. K., & Jones, L. S. (2005). Comprehensive classroom management creating positive learning environments for all students. Needham Height: Allyn, Bacon, & Schuster Company.
Karen Debord, & Janet Sawyers. (1996). The effects of training on the quality of family child care for those associated with and not associated with professional child care organizations. Child and Youth Care Forum, 25(1), 7-15.
Kasen, S., Berenson, K., Cohen, P., & Johnson, J. G. (2004). The effects of school climate on changes in aggressive and other behaviors related to bullying. In D. L. Espelage & S. M. Swearer (Eds.), Bullying in American schools: A socialecological perspective on prevention and intervention (pp. 187-210). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lagerspetz, K. M. J., Björkqvist, K., & Peltonen, T. (1988). Is indirect aggression typical of females? Gender differences in aggressiveness in 11- to 12-year-old children. Aggressive Behavior, 14, 403-414.
LaFontana, K. M., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2002). Children’s stereotypes of popular and unpopular peers:A multimethod assessment. Developmental Psychology, 38(5), 635-647.
Maassen, G. H., van der Linden, J. L., Goossens, F. A., & Bokhorst, J. (2000). A ratings-based approach to two-dimensional sociometric status determination. In A. H. N., Cillessen & W. M., Bukowski (Eds.), Recent advances in the measurement of acceptance and rejection in the peer system. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development (Vol. 88, pp. 55-73) . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Marcus, Robert, & Kramer, Catherine. (2001). Reactive and Proactive Aggression: Attachment and Social Competence Predictors. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 162(3), 260-276.
Marini, Z. A., Dane, A. V., Bosacki, S. L., & YLC-CURA (2006). Direct and indirect bully-victims: Differential psychosocial risk factors associated with adolescents involved in bullying and victimization. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 551-569.
Mayer, G. R. (1995). Preventing antisocial behavior in the schools. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 467-478. doi:10.1901/jaba.1995.28-467
McCleary, I. & Egan, M. (1989). Program design and evaluation: Two-way interactive television. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3, 50-60.
McNeilly-Choque, M.K., Hart, C.H., Robinson, C.C., Nelson, L.J., & Olsen, S.F. (1996). Overt and relational aggression on the playground: Correspondence among different informants. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 11, 47-65.
McGinley, M., & Carlo, G. (2007). Two sides of the same coin? The relations between prosocial and physically aggressive behaviors. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 36(3), 337-349.
Merrell, K.W. (2001). Assessment of children’s social skills: Recent developments, best practices, and new directions. Exceptionality, 9, 3-18.
Merrell, K.W. (2003). Behavioral, social, and emotional assessment of children and adolescents (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Merrell, K.W., Buchanan, R., & Tran, O. K. (2006). Relational aggression in children and adolescents: A review with implications for school settings. Psychology in the Schools, 43(3), 345-360.
Mikami, A. Y., Boucher, M. A., & Humphreys, K. (2005). Prevention of peer rejection through a classroom-level intervention in middle school. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 26, 5-23.
Murray-Close, D., Ostrov, J. M., & Crick, N. R. (2007). A short-term longitudinal study of growth of relational aggression during middle childhood: Associations with gender, friendship intimacy, and internalizing problems. Development and Psychopathology, 19, 187-203.
Nation, M.C., Crusto, C., Wandersman, A., Kumpfer, K.L., Seybolt, D., Morrissey-Kane, E., et al. (2003). What works in prevention: Principles of effective prevention programs. American Psychologist, 58, 449-456.
Neal, J. W. (2007). Why Social Networks Matter: A Structural Approach to the Study of Relational Aggression in Middle Childhood and Adolescence. Child Youth Care Forum, 36, 195-211.
Ostrov, J. M., Gentile, D. A., & Crick, N. R. (2006). Media exposure, aggression and prosocial behavior during early childhood: A longitudinal study. Social Development, 15, 612-627.
Owens, L. (1996). Sticks and stones and sugar and spice: Girls’ and boys’ aggression in schools. Australian Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 6, 45-55.
Owens, L., Slee, P., & Shute, R. (2001). Victimization among teenage girls: What can be done about indirect harassment? In J. Juvonen & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school : The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 215-241). New York: Guilford Press.
Parkhurst, J. T., & Hopmeyer, A. (1998). Sociometric popularity and peer-perceived popularity: Two distinct dimensions of peer status. Journal of Early Adolescence, 18, 125-144.
Pellegrini, A. D. (2001). Sampling instances of victimization in middle school: A methodological comparison. In J. Juvonen & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 125-144). New York: Guilford Press.
Pernice-Duca, F., Taiarioi, J., & Yoon, J. (2010). Perceptions of School and Family Climates and Experiences of Relational Aggression. Journal of School Violence, 9, 303-319.
Perry, D. G., Perry, L. G., & Rasmussen, P. (1986). Gognitive social learning mediators of aggression. Child Development, 57, 700-711.
Prescott, K. (1996). Gender differences and developmental trends in aggressive bahaviour: An edited interview with Kaj Björkqvist. Australian Journal of Guidance & Counseling, 6, 89-93.
Prinstein, M. J., Boergers, J., & Spirito, A. (2001). Adolescents’ and their friends’ health-risk behavior: Factors that alter or add to peer influence. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 26, 287-298.
Prinstein, M. J., Boergers, J., & Vernberg, E. M. (2001). Overt and relational aggression in adolescents: Social-psychological adjustment of aggressors and victims. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 30, 479-491.
Radlift, K. M., & Joseph, L. M. (2011). Girls Just Being Girls? Mediating Relational Aggression and Victimization. Preventing School Failure, 55(3), 171-179.
Reich, S. M. (2006). Vanderbilt electronic thesis and dissertation. Developmental Psychology, 19, 349-367.
Richardson, D. R., & Green, L. R. (1999). Social sanction and threat explanations of gender effects on direct and indirect aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 25, 425-434.
Rodkin, P. C., Farmer, T. W., Pearl, R., & Van Acker, R. (2000). Heterogeneity of popular boys: Antisocial and prosocial configurations. Developmental Psychology, 36(1), 14-24.
Roland, E., & Galloway, D. (2002). Classroom influences on bullying. Educational Research, 44, 299-312.
Rys, G. S., & Bear, G. G. (1997). Relational aggression and peer relations: Gender and development issues. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 43, 87-106.
Sramova, B. (2004). Cognitive training-teacher’s help. Studia Psychologtca, 46, 203-210.
Sebanc, A. M. (2003). The friendship features of preschool children: Links with prosocial behavior and aggression. Social Development, 12, 249-268.
Serow, R. C., & Solomon, D. (1979). Classroom climates and students' intergroup behavior. Journal of Educational psychology, 71, 669-676.
Skinner, C. H., Cashwell, T. H., & Skinner, A. L. (2000). Increasing tootling: The effects of a peer-monitored group contingency program on students’ reports of peers’ prosocial behaviors. Psychology in the School, 37, 263-270.
Somersalo, H., Solantaus, T., & Almqvist, F. (2002). Classroom climate and the mental health of primary school children. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 56, 285-290.
Spodek , B. (1993). Promoting prosocial behavior. In M. Kostelnik, et al.(Eds.). Guiding children’s social development (pp. 407-429). New York: Delmar Publishers.
Storch, E. A., & Masia-Warner, C. L. (2004). The relationship of peer victimization to social anxiety and loneliness in adolescent females. Journal of Adolescence, 27, 351-362.
Tomada, G., & Schneider, B. (1997). Relational aggression, gender, and peer acceptance: Invariance across culture, stability over time, and concordance among informants. Developmental Psychology, 33, 601-609.
Tremblay, R. E., Vitaro, F., & Bertrand, L., LeBlanc, M., Beauchesne, H., Bioleau, H., & David, L. (1992). Parent and child training to prevent early onset of delinquency: the Montreal longitudinal experimental study. In J. McCord & R. E. Tremblay (Eds.). Preventing Antisocial Behavior: Intervention From Birth Through Adolescence (pp. 117-138). New York: Guilford.
Underwood, M. K., Galen,B. R., & Paquette, J. A. (2001). Top ten challenges for understanding gender and aggression in children: Why can’t we all just get along? Social Development, 10, 248-266.
Underwood, M. K. (2003). Social Aggression among Girls. New York: Guilford Press.
Walker, H.M., Ramsey, E., & Gresham, F.M. (2004). Antisocial behavior in schools: Evidence-based practices (2nd ed.). Florence, KY: Wadsworth/Thompson Learning.
Weissberg, R.P., Kumpfer, K.L., & Seligman, M.E.P. (2003). Prevention for children and youth that works: An introduction. American Psychologist, 58, 425-432.
Wragg, E. C. (2001). Classroom management in the secondary school. New York: Routledge.
Wentzel, K. R., & Caldwell, K. (1997). Friendships, peer acceptance, and group membership: Relations to academic achievement in middle school. Child Development, 68, 1198-1209.
Whitted, K. S., & Dupper, D. R. (2005). Best practices for preventing or reducing bullying in schools. Children and Schools, 27, 167-175.
Xie, H. (1998). The development and functions of social aggression: A narrative analysis of social exchange in interpersonal conflicts. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Yoneyama, S. & Rigby, K. (2006). Bully/victim student & classroom climate. Youth Studies Australia, 25(3), 34-41.
Yoon, J. S., Barton, E., & Taiariol, T. (2004). Relational aggression in middle school: Educational implications in development research. Journal of Early Adolescence, 24(3), 303-318.
Yoon, J., & Kerber, K. (2003). Bullying: Elementary teachers’ attitudes and intervention strategies. Research in Education, 69, 27-35.
Young, E. L., Boye, A. E., & Nelson, D. A. (2006). Relational aggression: Understanding, identifying, and responding in schools. Psychology in Schools, 43(3), 297-312.
Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., Geiger T. C., & Crick N. R. (2005). Relational and Physical Aggression, Prosocial Behavior, and Peer Relations Gender Moderation and Bidirectional Associations. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 25 (4), 421-452.

下載圖示
QR CODE