研究生: |
陳姸臻 Chen, Yen-Chen |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
分析消費者使用汽車共享意圖行為之研究 Analyzing Key Factors for Consumers' Intention of Car Sharing |
指導教授: |
郭金國
Kuo, Chin-Guo |
口試委員: |
張仁家
Chang, Jen-Chia 李景峰 Li, Jeen-Fong 郭金國 Kuo, Chin-Guo |
口試日期: | 2023/06/26 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
工業教育學系科技應用管理碩士在職專班 Department of Industrial Education_Continuing Education Master's Program of Technological Management |
論文出版年: | 2023 |
畢業學年度: | 111 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 111 |
中文關鍵詞: | 科技接受模式 、汽車共享 、便利條件 、品牌形象 、經濟效益 |
英文關鍵詞: | technology acceptance model, car sharing, convenience, brand image, economic benefits |
研究方法: | 調查研究 |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202301127 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:223 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
以往汽車被人們視為動產,具有所有權。在人潮擁擠寸土寸金的城市中,汽車所帶來的負擔,逐漸為人們所體會。自從協作經濟、協同消費和共享經濟模式大量文獻被提出後,允許無所有權具有使用權,透過共享、交換、租賃共創經濟價值。
汽車共享為一全新的消費行為,隨時24小時提供小時計費的汽車租賃服務,使用者可以按需求的時間、地點以APP租車、還車、付費。使用者免去昂貴買車費用與折舊、保養費支出、購買產險責任險費用、購買昂貴停車位、支付賦稅、停車費等日積月累的耗費支出,所有權與使用權之間的淨收益,極具經濟效益。
本研究採用科技接受模式,以便利條件、品牌形象、經濟效益做為外部變數與TAM之知覺有用性、知覺易用性、使用態度(動機)以及使用意圖等構面發展問卷內容,針對台北市與新北市進行問卷調查,收集有效實證分析資料,以了解汽車共享的發展進程。
研究結果顯示,在單因子變異數檢定上,不同年齡、教育程度、年收入以及使用汽車共享頻率上,對於汽車共享服務評價具有差異。26至35歲的受測者對於便利條件、經濟效益、知覺有用性、知覺易用性和使用態度評價最高;36至45歲的受測者對使用意圖的評價最高;46至55歲的受測者對品牌形象的評價最高。便利條件、品牌形象和經濟效益對知覺有用性、知覺易用性、使用態度和使用意圖具有較強的影響。使用態度(動機)對使用意圖的影響最為顯著。
對未來接續的研究啟示包括擴大研究區域範疇,探討其他理性行為變數對消費者共享行為的影響。例如對車輛安全依附性、排除車輛故障的依附性、個資以及行車路徑保密的隱私依附,全新清潔消毒的品質以及與AI自動無人駕駛結合等議題,進一步研究汽車共享的未來發展。
In the past, cars were regarded as movable property and owned by people. In crowded cities where every inch of land is expensive, the burden brought by cars is gradually realized by people. Since a large number of documents on the collaborative economy, collaborative consumption, and sharing economic models have been proposed, no ownership is allowed to have the right to use, and economic value is created through sharing, exchange, and leasing.
Car sharing is a brand-new consumer behavior. It provides 24-hour hourly car rental service at any time. Users can rent, return and pay for a car with the APP according to the time and place they need. Users avoid expensive car purchase expenses and depreciation, maintenance expenses, purchase of property insurance liability insurance expenses, purchase of expensive parking spaces, payment of taxes, parking fees, etc. The net income between ownership and use rights is extremely high. economic benefits.
This study adopts the technology acceptance model, takes convenience, brand image, and economic benefits as external variables, and develops the content of the questionnaire in terms of TAM's perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, attitude (motivation), and intention to use, targeting Taipei City. Conduct a questionnaire survey with New North Trend to collect effective empirical analysis data to understand the development process of car sharing.
The results of the study show that in the single factor variance test, there are differences in the evaluation of car sharing services in terms of age, education level, annual income and frequency of car sharing. Respondents aged 26 to 35 rated convenience, economic benefit, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and attitude towards use the highest; respondents aged 36 to 45 rated intent to use highest; respondents aged 46 to 55 rated highest Respondents rated brand image the highest. Convenience, brand image and economic benefits have a strong impact on perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, use attitude and use intention. Use attitude (motivation) has the most significant impact on use intention.
Implications for future follow-up research include expanding the scope of the research area and exploring the impact of other rational behavior variables on consumers' sharing behavior. For example, issues such as the dependence on vehicle safety, the dependence on troubleshooting vehicles, the privacy dependence on the confidentiality of personal information and driving routes, the quality of new cleaning and disinfection, and the combination with AI automatic driverless driving, etc., further study the future development of car sharing.car.
王玉珍、李宜玫、吳清麟(2019)。青少年優勢力量表之發展研究。教育心理學報,50(3),503-528。
江欣慈(2019)。臺灣消費者對於電商通路使用行為之研究─ TAM 模型觀點(未出版之碩士論文)。淡江大學,新北市。
吳岱蓮(2021)。消費者對共享機車使用意圖之研究-以整合科技接受模型(UTAUT)觀點(未出版之碩士論文)。淡江大學,新北市。
吳智鴻、蔡依錞(2014)。以科技接受模式來探討社群網站Facebook的使用意圖。國立臺灣科技大學人文社會學報,10(1),29-44。
李思漢(2013)。台北市路平專案經濟效益評估模式建立(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中央大學,桃園縣。
林士翔(2014)。從科技接受模式探討消費者在KIOSK購票之態度與意願以7-ELEVENibon為例(未出版之碩士論文)。中國文化大學,台北市。
林昱朋(2019)。共享經濟的自治與管制之研究--以 Airbnb 為中心(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄大學,高雄市。
林千立、林美珍(2007)。中文版寂寞量表之效度與信度研究-以老年人為例。輔導與諮商學報,29(2),41-50。
洪新原、梁定澎、張嘉銘(2005)。科技接受模式之彙總研究。資訊管理學報,12(4),211-234。
胡會榮(2015)。共享經濟之商業平台模式研究-以Uber為例(未出版碩士論文)。清華大學,新竹市。
徐嘉欣(2011)。以科技接受模式探討公務人員數位學習之研究-以公務員資訊學習網為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,台北市。
張必康(2020)。以科技接受模式探討消費者接受純網銀的行為意圖(未出版之碩士論文)。淡江大學,新北市。
張淑琳(2018)。從共享經濟模式探討共居之行為意圖--以玖樓共居公寓為例(未出版之碩士論文)。淡江大學,新北市。
張靜宜(2004)。服務設計影響服務便利性知覺之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。東吳大學,台北市。
張家熒(2016)。服務導向共享經濟之電子服務品質研究(未出版碩士論文)。中原大學,桃園市。
郭昱瑩(2005)。決策幫手:成本效益分析之概念與實務。T&D飛訊,30,1-4。
郭裕元(2013)。以科技接受模式探討影響消費者使用智慧電動車意圖之要素。國立成功大學,台南市。
陳孟修(2014)。品牌形象、價格促銷、廣告效果與顧客價值對顧客滿意度之影響性研究。興國學報,15,31-49。
陳建成、陳冠旭、曾煥宗(2019)。新北市公共自行車(YouBike)使用者意見調查。都市交通,34(2),51-65。
陳建豪(2018)。消費者對經濟型旅館選擇行為之探討(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東大學,屏東縣。
陳薇竹(2014)。消費者使用動機對沉浸經驗與持續使用意圖影響之研究-以Line行動社群軟體為例(未出版之碩士論文)。中國科技大學,台北市。
陳怡婷(n.d.)。你今天共享了嗎。鉅亨網。取自https://topics.cnyes.com/sharing/
黃姵嫙(2018)。綠色招募活動對組織人才吸引力之影響:以個人組織配適知覺為中介變數與個人環保態度為干擾變數(未出版之碩士論文)。東海大學,台中市。
廖凱雯(2013)。整合TAM與TRA理論探討消費者購買液晶電視之意願。國立成功大學(未出版之碩士論文),台南市。
劉財龍(2012)。手機產業品牌形象之研究。大仁學報,40,75-99。
劉盈辰(2019)。基於科技接受模式探討共享經濟使用者的行為意圖:以 Airbnb為例(未出版之碩士論文)。朝陽科技大學,台中市。
顏曉伶(2021)。消費者使用餐廳訂閱制平台之行為認知-科技接受模式的分析觀點(未出版之碩士論文)。中山醫學大學,台中市。
蘇伯方(2004)。即時傳訊軟體採用模式之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中山大學,高雄市。
龎汝茜(2016)。共享經濟、品牌形象對Uber使用意圖之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。東海大學,台中市。
小客貨車租賃業營運狀況調查報告(2016年5月11日)。政府資料開放平台。取自https://data.gov.tw/dataset/6249
智庫百科(2016年7月13日)。經濟效益。MBA智庫百科。取自https://wiki.mbalib.com/zh-tw/%E7%BB%8F%E6%B5%8E%E6%95%88%E7%9B%8A
台北市交通局(2017年3月)。臺北市實施共享汽機車可行性研究及先期規劃案。臺灣開放資料集散地。取自https://odportal.tw/dataset/lN6eATPt
轉角國際(2018)。共享退場:巴黎「城市共享電動車」Autolib全面下線。取自https://global.udn.com/global_vision/story/8662/3284049
YAHOO新聞(2019)。共享汽車Car2Go 明年撤出北美。世界新聞網。取自https://reurl.cc/OE6W4v
Aaker, D. A. (1996). Measuring brand equity across products and markets. California Management Review, 38(3). 102-120.
Acquier, A., Daudigeos, T., & Pinkse, J. (2017). Promises and paradoxes of the sharing economy: An organizing framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 125, 1-10.
Acquier, A., Valiorgue, B., & Daudigeos, T. (2017). Sharing the shared value: A transaction cost perspective on strategic CSR policies in global value chains. Journal of Business Ethics, 144(1), 139-152.
Ailawadi, K. L., & Keller, K. L. (2004). Understanding retail branding: conceptual insights and research priorities. Journal of retailing, 80(4), 331-342.
Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In Action control (pp. 11-39). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1969). The prediction of behavioral intentions in a choice situation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 5(4), 400-416.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1975). A Bayesian analysis of attribution processes. Psychological Bulletin, 82(2), 261.
Akundi, K. (2003). Cluster based Economic Development. Part1: A Survey of State Initiatives. Austin, Texas Economic Development, Business and Industry Data Center.
Alba, J., Lynch, J., Weitz, B., Janiszewski, C., Lutz, R., Sawyer, A., & Wood, S. (1997). Interactive home shopping: consumer, retailer, and manufacturer incentives to participate in electronic marketplaces. Journal of Marketing, 61(3), 38-53.
Atkinson, A. A., Waterhouse, J. H., & Wells, R. B. (1997). A stakeholder approach to strategic performance measurement. MIT Sloan Management Review, 38(3), 25.
Barth, M., Shaheen, S., Fukuda, T., and Fukuda, A. (2006). Carsharing and station cars in Asia: overview of Japan and Singapore. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1986:106–115
Belk, R. (2007). Why not share rather than own?. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 611(1), 126-140.
Belk, R. (2014). You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1595-1600.
Belk, R. (2018). Foreword: the sharing economy. The rise of the sharing economy: Exploring the challenges and opportunities of collaborative consumption, 9-12.
Bentler, P. M., & Chou, C. P. (1987). Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological Methods and Research, 16, 78–117.
Berry, L. L., Seiders, K., & Grewal, D. (2002). Understanding service convenience. Journal of Marketing, 66(3), 1-17.
Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 351-370.
Botsman, R., & Rogers, R. (2010). What’s mine is yours. The rise of collaborative consumption. Harper Business, America.
Botsman, R., & Rogers, R. (2010). What’s mine is yours. The rise of collaborative consumption, 1.
Boztepe, S. (2005) ‘Convenience and Social Practice’, paper presented at the 1st Product and Service Design Symposium on Agricultural Industries: Agricultural Design: Olive Oil, Wine, and Design, Izmir, Turkey, April.
Celsor, C., & Millard-Ball, A. (2007). Where does carsharing work? Using geographic information systems to assess market potential. Transportation Research Record, 1992(1), 61-69.
Chakraborty, U., & Bhat, S. (2018). The effects of credible online reviews on brand equity dimensions and its consequence on consumer behavior. Journal of Promotion Management, 24(1), 57-82.
Chang, C. T., Hajiyev, J., & Su, C. R. (2017). Examining the students’ behavioral intention to use e-learning in Azerbaijan? The general extended technology acceptance model for e-learning approach. Computers & Education, 111, 128-143.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 319-340.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.
Dobni, D. & Zinkhan, G. M. (1990). In Search of Brand Image: A Foundation Analysis. In M. E. Goldberg, G. Gorn, & R. W. Pollay (Eds.), NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 17 (pp. 110-119). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
Dobni, D., & Zinkhan, G. M. (1990). In search of brand image: A foundation analysis. ACR North American Advances.
Drut, M. (2022). A case in the field of mobility and transport: the Autolib’ car-sharing platform. In Degrowth and strategy, how to bring about social-ecological transformation (Chapter 15, pp.302-309). MayFly. ISBN: 978-1-906948-60-3. Retrieved from ⟨hal-03771891⟩.
Ert, E., Fleischer, A., & Magen, N. (2016). Trust and reputation in the sharing economy: The role of personal photos in Airbnb. Tourism Management, 55, 62-73.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. MA: Addison-Wesley.
Felson, M., & Spaeth, J. L. (1978). Community structure and collaborative consumption: A routine activity approach. American Behavioral Scientist, 21(4), 614-624.
Ferrero, F., Perboli, G., Rosano, M., & Vesco, A. (2018). Car-sharing services: An annotated review. Sustainable Cities and Society, 37, 501-518.
Frenken, K. (2017). Political economies and environmental futures for the sharing economy. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 375(2095), 20160367.
Green Car Reports (2016). Daimler’s Car2Go carsharing service signs up 78,000 China users in 2 months. Retrieved from http://www.greencarreports.com/news/1104399 daimlers-car2go-carsharing-service-signs-up-78000-china-usersin-2-months. Last accessed April 4th, 2017.
Guttentag, D. (2015). Airbnb: disruptive innovation and the rise of an informal tourism accommodation sector. Current issues in Tourism, 18(12), 1192-1217.
Hamari, J., Sjöklint, M., & Ukkonen, A. (2015). The Sharing Economy: Why People Participate in Collaborative Consumption. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(9), 2-13.
Hernando, J. R. (2016). Crowdfunding: The collaborative economy for channelling institutional and household savings. Research in International Business and Finance, 38, 326-337.
Hossain, M. (2020). Sharing economy: A comprehensive literature review. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 87, 102470.
Igbaria, M., Parasuraman, S., & Baroudi, J. J. (1996). A motivational model of microcomputer usage. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13(1), 127-143.
Kaufman-Scarborough, C., & Lindquist, J. D. (2003). Understanding the experience of time scarcity. Time & Society, 12(2-3), 349-370.
Le Vine, S., Zolfaghari, A., & Polak, J. (2014). Evolution, Challenges and Opportunities. Centre for Transport Studies, Imperial College London
Marchi, A., & Parekh, E. J. (2015). How the sharing economy can make its case. McKinsey Quarterly, 3.
Margulies, W. P. (1977) `Make the most of your corporate identity', Harvard Business Review, 55(4), 66-72.
Mauri, A. G., Minazzi, R., Nieto-García, M., & Viglia, G. (2018). Humanize your business. The role of personal reputation in the sharing economy. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 73, 36-43.
Miller, R. E., & Blair, P. D. (2009). Input-output analysis: foundations and extensions. Cambridge university press. Cambridge.
Moon, J. W., & Kim, Y. G. (2001). Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context. Information & Management, 38(4), 217-230.
Nandan, S. (2005). An exploration of the brand identity–brand image linkage: A communications perspective. Journal of Brand Management, 12, 264-278.
Noll, B. (2017). Car Sharing and Urban Mobility in Malmö and San Francisco: A Niche Dynamic Perspective. IIIEE Theses.
Owyang J., Samuel A., & Grenville A. (2014). Sharing is The New Buying, Crowd Companies Report.
Park, C. W., Jaworski, B. J., & MacInnis, D. J. (1986). Strategic brand concept-image management. Journal of Marketing, 50(4), 135-145.
Pazaitis, A., De Filippi, P., & Kostakis, V. (2017). Blockchain and value systems in the sharing economy: The illustrative case of Backfeed. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 125, 105-115.
Peereboom, D. (2019). The prospect of car sharing. Master thesis. Environmental & Infrastructure Planning, University of Groningen.
Posen, H. A. (2015). Ridesharing in the sharing economy: Should regulators impose Uber regulations on Uber. Iowa L. Rev., 101, 405.
Quesnay, F. (1758). Questions Interessantes sur la population, l'agriculture et le commerce.
Shaheen, S. A., Cohen, A. P., & Roberts, J. D. (2006). Carsharing in North America: Market growth, current developments, and future potential. Transportation Research Record, 1986(1), 116-124.
Stephany, A. (2015). The business of sharing: Making it in the new sharing economy. Springer.
Stokes, K., Clarence, E., Anderson, L., & Rinne, A. (2014). Making sense of the UK collaborative economy (Vol. 49). London: Nesta.
Szetela, B., & Mentel, G. (2016). May the sharing economy create a new wave of globalization?. Економічний часопис-ХХІ, (161), 31-34.
Schulte, F., & Voß, S. (2015). Decision support for environmental-friendly vehicle relocations in free-floating car sharing systems: The case of car2go. Procedia Cirp, 30, 275-280.
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144-176.
Torben Rick, (2013). The drivers behind the rise of the collaborative economy. Retrievedfrom http://www.torbenrick.eu/blog/strategy/the-drivers-behind-the-rise-of-the-collaborative-economy/
Vargo, S.L. and Lusch, R. (2004) ‘Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing’, Journal of Marketing 68(1), 1-17.
Walras, L. (1874). 1954. Elements of pure economics. Routledge.
Yale, L., & Venkatesh, A. (1986). Toward the Construct of Convenience in Consumer Research. In R. J. Lutz (Ed.), Advances in Consumer Research Volume 13 (pp. 403-408).