簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 曾喜謙
Tseng, Hsi-Chien
論文名稱: 運算思維策略融入高齡者英語口說課程之行動研究
An Action Research Study of Integrating Computational Thinking Strategies into an English Speaking Class of Elderly Learners
指導教授: 郝永崴
Hao, Yung-Wei
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 課程與教學研究所
Graduate Institute of Curriculum and Instruction
論文出版年: 2020
畢業學年度: 108
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 152
中文關鍵詞: 運算思維英語口說表現高齡學習者行動研究
英文關鍵詞: computational thinking, english speaking performance, elderly learners, action research
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202000143
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:274下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在融入運算思維策略於英語口說教學課程,以提升高齡學習者的英語口說表現。本研究採行動研究法,以台北市某國中十位高齡學習者為研究對象,進行為期四週共八次的運算思維英語口說課程,每次授課兩小時。本研究所使用教材包括「我的第一本中高齡旅遊英語」,以及研究者設計之學習單與活動。本研究所選用的運算思維策略為「資料萃取」、「樣式辨識」、「拆解」、「演算法思考」,並且採實作評量的方式,根據十位學習者的前、後測表現,瞭解其英語口說表現的改變情形。此外,本研究透過觀察、學生日誌、教師日誌、課堂錄影等資料,進一步了解高齡學習者英語口說表現的改變情形,以及對於本課程方案的態度與看法。研究結果發現,運算思維的融入有助於高齡學習者的英語口說「流暢性」、「精確性」的提升;在「發音」上則沒有顯著的差異。在態度與看法方面,高齡者對於本課程方案普遍抱持正向與肯定的態度。

    The purpose of this action research was to integrate computational thinking strategies in an elders’ speaking class to enhance English speaking proficiency. The participants were ten elder learners in a junior high school in Taipei. Four computational thinking strategies were implemented, “abstraction”, “pattern recognition”, “decomposition”, and “algorithm thinking.” The participants took the Computational Thinking English speaking course for 4 weeks, 8 classes, 2 hours per class. Through action research, after 8 classes the elder students’ overall performance of English speaking proficiency was enhanced. In addition, the outcome of semi-structure interviews indicated that 10 elder learners enjoyed the courses, and had positive responses to the four computational thinking strategies implemented within each class. Suggestions concerning the way to integrate computational thinking into English speaking for the old-age learning were presented.

    誌謝詞 ii 中文摘要 iii Abstract iv 目次 i 表次 iii 圖次 iv 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的與待答問題 4 第三節 名詞釋義 5 第四節 研究範圍與限制 6 第二章 文獻探討 9 第一節 高齡學習者 9 第二節 運算思維 17 第三節 英語口說教學 25 第三章 研究設計與實施 37 第一節 研究方法 37 第二節 研究情境 38 第三節 課程方案設計與實施 53 第四節 研究流程 57 第五節 研究工具 61 第六節 資料蒐集 64 第七節 資料分析 64 第八節 研究倫理 66 第四章 結果與討論 67 第一節 運算思維策略融入方式與成效 67 第二節 學習者個人英語口說表現改變情形 87 第三節 學習者對於本課程的態度與看法 98 第四節 教學者個人專業成長改變情形 102 第五章 結論與建議 105 第一節 結論 105 第二節 建議 107 參考文獻 109 附錄 117 附件一、 教師日誌 117 附件二、 學習日誌 119 附件三、 訪談問題 120 附件四、 諍友觀課意見表 121 附件五、 學習者前後測情境題目 123 附件六、 第一堂課教案 126 附件七、 第二堂課教案 128 附件八、 第三堂課教案 131 附件九、 第四堂課教案 133 附件十、 第五堂課教案 135 附件十一、 第六堂課教案 137 附件十二、 第七堂課教案 139 附件十三、 第八堂課教案 142 附件十四、 學習者前測的質性回饋 145 附件十五、 學習者後測的質性回饋 149

    一、中文部分
    吳明隆(2007)。SPSS 操作與應用:問卷統計分析實務。臺北:五南。
    林勤敏。(2002)。高齡學習者的障礙與困難。成人教育,65,44-50。
    林麗惠(2002)。高齡者參與學習活動與生活滿意度關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所,嘉義縣。
    花梅真(2017)。語文領域教學示例。取自https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9lO8tzMRLy7TVN5N1RhNmVBemc/view
    張德永、陳柏霖(2013)。高齡學習者學習行為觀察與評估。 T&D 飛訊,163,6-7。
    教育部(2016)。運算思維推動計畫。取自 http://compthinking.csie.ntnu.edu.tw/
    黃富順(2004)。高齡學習。臺北:五南。
    黃富順、楊國德。(2016)。高齡學。臺北:五南。
    楊喜貯(2008)。影響高齡者英語學習動機取向因素之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中正大學高齡者教育所,嘉義縣。
    葉盈怡(2014)。台灣高齡學習者的英語學習動機和單字學習策略(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學英語學系,屏東縣。
    廖曉青(2002)。英語教學法。臺北:五南。
    甄曉蘭(2003)。 課程行動硏究:實例與方法解析。臺北:師大書苑。
    蔡承家(2010)。樂齡學習。臺北:師大書苑。
    蔡清田(2000)。教育行動研究。臺北:五南。
    蔡清田(2011)。行動研究的理論與實踐。T&D飛訊,118,1-20。
    謝麗紅(2015)。銀髮族參與英語課程學習動機與學習阻礙之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。康寧大學應用外語研究所,臺南市。
    簡素枝(2004)。嘉義縣市高齡學習參與者與非參與者在人際關係、生活滿意度之比較研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所,嘉義縣。
    簡潤秋(2012)。中高齡者參與英語課程學習動機與相關影響因素之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。南開科技大學福祉科技與服務管理所,南投縣。
    魏彩密(2007)。高齡學習者溝通式英語教學學習滿意度之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學社會教育學系在職進修碩士班,臺北市。

    二、英文部分
    Barr, D., Harrison, J., & Conery, L. (2011). Computational thinking: A digital age skill for everyone. Learning & Leading with Technology, 38(6), 20-23.
    Barr, V., & Stephenson, C. (2011). Bringing computational thinking to K-12: what is Involved and what is the role of the computer science education community?. Inroads, 2(1), 48-54.
    Batool, N., Anosh, M., Batool, A., & Iqbal, N. (2015). The direct method: a good start to teach oral language. Journal of Literature, Languages and Linguistics. An International Peer-reviewed Journal, 5, 53-55.
    Bocconi, S., Chioccariello, A., Dettori, G., Ferrari, A., Engelhardt, K., Kampylis, P., Punie, Y. (2016). Developing computational thinking in compulsory education – Implications for policy and practice. Technical report, European Union Scientific and Technical Research Reports. EUR 28295 EN.
    Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching. New York: Longman.
    Buitrago Flórez, F., Casallas, R., Hernández, M., Reyes, A., Restrepo, S., & Danies, G. (2017). Changing a generation’s way of thinking: Teaching computational thinking through programming. Review of Educational Research, 87(4), 834-860.
    Burke, D. M., MacKay, D. G., Worthley, J. S., & Wade, E. (1991). On the tip of the tongue: What causes word finding failures in young and older adults?. Journal of memory and language, 30(5), 542-579.
    Cattell, R. B. (1963). Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence: A critical experiment. Journal of educational psychology, 54(1), 1.
    Clennell, S. (1990). Older Students in Europe. A Survey of Older Students in Four European Countries. Milton Keynes: Open University
    Cohen, A. D., Weaver, S. J., & Li, T. Y. (1996). The impact of strategies-based instruction on speaking a foreign language. London: Longman.
    CSTA - Computer Science Teacher Association. (2011). “CSTA K-12 Computer Science Standards”. CSTA Standards Task Force. ACM - Association for Computing Machinery
    Crystal, D. (2012). English as a global language. Cambridge: Cambridge university press.
    Davis, A. (2001). The impact of aging on education, Adult Learning and Development Continuing Education Division, University of Manitoba.
    Derakhshan, A., Khalili, A. N., & Beheshti, F. (2016). Developing EFL learner’s speaking ability, accuracy and fluency. English Language and Literature Studies, 6(2), 177-186.
    Farooqui, S. (2007). Developing speaking skills of adult learners in private universities in Bangladesh: problems and solutions. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 47(1), 94.
    Foos, P. W. (1997). Effects of memory training on anxiety and performance in older adults. Educational Gerontology: An International Quarterly, 23(3), 243-252.
    Goh, C. C. M. (2007). Teaching speaking in the language classroom. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.
    Goh, C. C. M., & Burns, A. (2012). Teaching speaking: A holistic approach. New York: Cambridge.
    Google. (2010). computational thinking for educators. Retrieved from https://computationalthinkingcourse.withgoogle.com/unit?lesson=8&unit=1
    Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational thinking in K-12: A review of the state of the field. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38-43.
    Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching. Harlow, UK: Pearson Longman.
    Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern language journal, 70(2), 125-132.
    Hubenthal, W. (2004). Older Russian immigrants’ experiences in learning English; motivation, methods, and barriers. Adult Basic Education, 14(2), 104.
    Imel, S. (1991). Older worker training: An overview (Report No. 114). Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. BBB16032)
    International Society for Technology in Education, & Computer Science Teachers Association. (2011). Computational thinking teacher resources. Retrieved from https://id.iste.org /docs/ct-documents/ct-teacher-resources_2ed-pdf.pdf?sfvrsn=2
    International Society for Technology in Education, & Computer Science Teachers Association. (2011). Operational Definition of Computational Thinking for K–12 Education. Retrieved from http://www.iste.org/docs/ct- documents/computational-thinking-operational-definition-flyer.pdf?sfvrsn=2
    Jalaluddin, M. (2016). Using YouTube to Enhance Speaking Skills in ESL Classroom. English for Specific Purposes World, 17, 50.
    Jonas, A., Tsai, C. H., & Chuang, C. M. (2010). Adopting supplementary materials to enhance listening and speaking strategy used by Taiwanese college EFL learners. Great Light Journal ,59, 25-41.
    Kazimoglu, C., Kiernan, M., Bacon, L., & Mackinnon, L. (2012). A serious game for developing computational thinking and learning introductory computer programming. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 1991-1999.
    Khameis, M. (2007). Using creative strategies to promote students’ speaking skills. Fujairah: Fujairah Women College.
    Knowles, M. (1970). The modern practice of education: Andragogy versus pedagogy. New York, NY: Association Press.
    Kolodziej, M. (2017). Computational Thinking in Curriculum for Higher Education (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Pepperdine University, Malibu, CA.
    Krashen, S. D. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Lamdin, L. S., & Fugate, M. (1997). Elderlearning: New frontier in an aging society. Phoenix, AZ: The Oryz Press.
    Larsen-Freeman, D. (2000). Techniques and principles in language teaching. New York: Oxford University Press.
    MacIntyre, P. D., & Charos, C. (1996). Personality, attitudes, and affect as predictors of second language communication. Journal of language and social psychology, 15(1), 3-26.
    Mart, C. T. (2013). The audio-lingual method: An easy way of achieving speech. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 3(12), 63.
    Morozova, Y. (2013). Methods of enhancing speaking skills of elementary level students. Translation Journal, 17(1), 1-24.
    Nation, I. S., & Newton, J. (2008). Teaching ESL/EFL listening and speaking. New York: Routledge.
    O'Dowd, M. (2005). Learning from childhood to mature adulthood: what makes people want ‘to learn to and keep on learning?. Compare, 35(3), 321-338.
    O'keeffe, A., McCarthy, M., & Carter, R. (2007). From corpus to classroom: Language use and language teaching. UK: Cambridge University Press.
    O'reilly, T., & Sheehan, K. M. (2009). Cognitively based assessment of, for, and as learning: A framework for assessing reading competency. ETS Research Report Series, 2009(2), i-43.
    Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. New York: Newbury House.
    Pattanpichet, F. (2011). The effects of using collaborative learning to enhance students English speaking achievement. Journal of College Teaching & Learning (TLC), 8(11), 1-10.
    Richards, J. C. (2008). Teaching listening and speaking. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge university press.
    Schulz, R. A., & Elliott, P. (2000). Learning Spanish as an older adult. Hispania, 107-119.
    Shumin, K. (2002). Factors to consider: Developing adult EFL students’ speaking abilities. Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice, 12, 204-211.
    Umam, C. (2011). Improving the Students‟ Speaking Ability through Role-Playing Technique. Web log post. Np, 24.
    Wallace, T., Stariha, W. E., & Walberg, H. J. (2004). Teaching speaking, listening and writing. Brussels: International Academy of Education.
    Weinstein-Shr, G. (1993). Growing Old in America: Learning English Literacy in the Later Years. t. Washington, DC: National Clearing- house for ESL Literacy Education
    Widdowson, H. G. (1978). Teaching language as communication. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Wing, J. (2011). Research notebook: Computational thinking—What and why. The Link Magazine, 20-23.
    Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33-35.
    Wing, J. M. (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 366(1881), 3717-3725.
    Yen, Y. C., Hou, H. T., & Chang, K. E. (2015). Applying role-playing strategy to enhance learners’ writing and speaking skills in EFL courses using Facebook and Skype as learning tools: A case study in Taiwan. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(5), 383-406.

    無法下載圖示 電子全文延後公開
    2025/01/01
    QR CODE