簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 黃莉琪
Li-chi Huang
論文名稱: 高中英語科實習教師較學計畫歷程:個案研究
The Lesson Planning Processes of EFL Intern Teachers at Senior High Schools: Four Case Studies
指導教授: 程玉秀
Cheng, Yuh-Show
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 英語學系
Department of English
論文出版年: 2002
畢業學年度: 90
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 202
中文關鍵詞: 英語教學教學計劃師資培育個案研究
英文關鍵詞: English teaching, Lesson Planning, Teacher education, Case studies
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:225下載:32
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 文獻指出過去教育研究較著重於研究教師外顯行為與學生學習成就之關係,而忽略教師內心思考的歷程。近二十年來,教師思考研究已經成為教育領域的主流。在台灣,近年來也有許多研究者投入這個領域。惟在英語教學領域對於生手教師的思考之研究尚有不足,本研究期以從教師教學計劃歷程的角度切入,探討生手英語教師的思考歷程。本研究經由觀察與晤談方式,旨在探討四位台灣高中英語科實習教師的教學計劃歷程,藉此了解他們是如何根據實習指導教師所指派之教學任務,準備並實施其教學計劃,另外亦探討這些實習教師在備課與實施過程中,受到何種因素的影響。
    研究結果以個案方式呈現,發現四個個案的教學計畫受到兩大因素的影響。一為個人的英語學習與教學經驗與信念,另一為環境因素,包括他們的實習學校,實習指導教師及其所指派之教學實習內容,以及學生。其中,這些個案高中所受英語教育與大學所受英語教育之經驗不同,影響他們對英語教學的看法,進而影響到他們的教學計畫與實施。基於研究發現,研究者提出一些對英語教師師資培育的建議,以期未來英語師資培育更能協助準教師做好準備,並持續提供實習教師更良好的學習機會。
    關鍵字: 個案研究、教學計劃、英語教學、實習教師、師資培育

    For decades, the field of second and foreign language teaching has focused on teachers’ behaviors or the learning outcome they produce. Yet with a recent shift in focus to teacher cognitions that underlie their classroom practice in this field, researchers have begun to explore this emerging terrain from various perspectives such as teachers’ beliefs, decision making, pedagogical content knowledge, and curricular planning (e.g. Woods, 1996). These endeavors have contributed greatly to our understanding of language teaching. However, work on understanding novice language teachers’ thinking, though evolving, is insufficient. In view of this, this study sought to investigate the processes of planning and implementing lessons in which intern teachers of English as a Foreign Language in Taiwan engaged while doing their teaching practice.
    By classroom observations and in-depth interviews, this study explored how four interns approached and planned their teaching assignments given by their mentors, how they implemented their plans, and what factors came into play in the process of accomplishing the assignments.
    Analysis of the data revealed that these intern teachers’ in-class and pre- or post- class decision making was mainly influenced by two groups of factors and the interaction of the two: (1) the intern teachers’ experiences of and beliefs in English learning and teaching, and (2) contextual factors, including their unique teaching assignments, their students, and their mentors. Among the factors, the intern teachers’ ‘apprenticeship of observation’ in high school and in college and their students’ expectations and in-class responses were especially significant in shaping the interns’ practices.
    This study fills in a gap in the current literature on teacher thinking in the field of second language teaching, specifically that in Taiwan. It intends to provide a realistic description of intern teachers’ planning processes, with the complexity inherent in the teaching assignments in mind. Several implications for second language teacher preparation programs are discussed.
    Key Words: case studies, lesson planning, English teaching, intern teachers, teacher education

    TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS………………………………………………i ABSTRACT.…………………………………………………ii LIST OF TABLES…………………………………………………………………..ix CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1 MOTIVATION 1 THEORETICAL BACKGROUND 2 Teacher Thinking in General Education 2 Teacher Thinking in the Field of Second Language Teaching 4 Teacher Thinking in Taiwan 5 PURPOSE OF THE STUDY 6 DEFINITIONS OF TERMS 7 CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW 9 RESEARCH ON TEACHER PLANNING AND DECISION MAKING 9 The Framework for Research on Teacher Planning and Decision Making 10 Research on Preactive Decisions or Planning 12 Research on Interactive Decisions 16 FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE PLANNING AND DECISION MAKING 23 Factors Identified in the Field of General Education 23 Factors Identified in the Field of Second Language Teaching 25 MODELS OF TEACHER PLANNING AND DECISION MAKING 32 CHAPTER THREE METHOD 40 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE EFL TEACHER DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM IN TAIWAN 40 PARTICIPANTS AND THEIR SETTINGS 41 DATA COLLECTION 44 Classroom Observations 44 Interviews 46 Formal Interviews 47 Informal Interviews 51 The Resulting Data 52 DATA ANALYSIS 52 CHAPTER FOUR RESULTS 54 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OF THE FOUR CASES 55 English Learning Experiences 55 Perspectives on the Teacher Education Courses in College 56 Beliefs in Learning and Teaching English 57 Teaching Practice Contexts 60 The Textbooks Used by the Participants 62 JANE’S CASE 64 Teaching Assignment 64 Ground Plan for the Teaching Assignment 65 Getting Familiar With the Textbook Content 66 Time Mapping and Lesson Plan in a Note Form 67 Weighing and Selecting Teaching Contents for Classroom Instruction 68 Sequencing the Selected Teaching Contents 69 Transforming the Selected Units 71 Planning for Vocabulary Teaching 71 Planning for Teaching Reading 74 Planning for Teaching Grammar Focus, Language Use, and Conversation 76 Modifications of Plans While Planning 77 Actual Classroom Practice 79 Modifications of Plans in the Classroom 80 Summary 83 ROB’S CASE 85 Teaching Assignment 85 A Framework of Planning 85 Time Mapping 86 Planning on a Daily Base 87 Weighting and Selection 88 Sequence of the Selected Units 90 Integration of the Schedule and the Sequence 91 Transformation of the Selected Content 93 Actual Classroom Practice 99 Daily Routines 100 Strategies for Presentation 100 Use of English or Mandarin 101 Modifications of Plans in the Classroom 102 Summary 104 CHARLOTTE’S CASE 105 Teaching Assignment 105 Personal Characteristics in Planning 106 A Preset Model in Planning 107 Use of English As the Language of Instruction 108 Strategies for Motivating Students’ Learning 109 Routines for Classroom Procedures 110 Transformation of the Content in Each Lesson Assigned 112 Modifications of Plans While Planning 120 Actual Classroom Practice 122 Teaching Techniques and Strategies From the Mentor 122 Modifications of the Plans in the Classroom 123 Summary 124 SHERRY’S CASE 126 Teaching Assignment 126 Routines in Planning and Enactment Processes 127 Routines Established at the Outset 128 Change in Teaching Focus 130 Sequence of the Selected Teaching Content 132 Getting Familiar with the Content 136 Transformation of the Teaching Content 137 Transforming the Conversation 138 Transforming the Magazine Content 143 Actual Classroom Practice 143 Use of Mandarin as the Language of Instruction 144 Modification of Plans in the Classroom 144 Summary 148 CHAPTER FIVE DISCUSSION 150 NATURE OF PLANNING AND ENACTMENT PROCESSES 150 Two Levels of Planning 150 Global Planning 151 Local Planning 153 Forms of Planning 155 Routines, Planning Styles, and Actual Classroom Practice 157 Routines in Planning and Implementation 157 Personal Planning Styles 159 Actual Classroom Practice 159 INFLUENCES ON PLANNING AND ENACTMENT OF PLANS 162 The Role of Experiences and Beliefs 162 Apprenticeship of Observation 163 Beliefs in Learning and Teaching English 167 Contextual Factors 172 Teaching Assignments 173 Students 176 Mentor 180 Other Context Factors 183 CHAPTER SIX CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS 184 CONCLUSIONS 184 IMPLICATIONS 186 Suggestions for Future Research 191 REFERENCES 194 APPENDICES 202

    Allwright, R. L. (1981). What do we want teaching materials for? ELT Journal, 36(1), 5-18.
    Almarza, G. G. (1996). Student foreign language teacher’s knowledge growth. In D. Freeman & J.C. Richards (Eds.), Teacher Learning in Language Teaching. (pp. 50-78). Cambridge University Press.
    Bailey, K. M., Bergthold, B., Braunstein, B., Fleischman, J. N., Holbrook, M. P., Tuman, J., Waissbluth, X., & Zambo, L. J. (1996). The language learner’s autobiography: Examining the “apprenticeship of observation”. In D. Freeman & J.C. Richards (Eds.), Teacher Learning in Language Teaching (pp. 11-29). Cambridge University Press.
    Ball, D. L. & Feiman-Nemser, S. (1988). Using textbooks and teachers’ guides: A dilemma for beginning teachers and teacher educators. Curriculum Inquiry, 18 (4), 401-423.
    Ball, D.L. & McDiarmid, G. W. (1990). The subject-matter preparation of teachers. In W.R. Houston, M. Haberman, & J. Sikula (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Teacher Education (pp 437-449). New York: Macmillan.
    Barne, D. (1992).The significance of teachers’ frame for teaching. In T. Russell, & H. Munby (Eds.), Teachers and Teaching: From Classroom to Reflection (pp. 9-32). London: The Falmer Press.
    Ben-Peretz, M., & Rumney, S. (1991). Professional thinking in guided practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7(5/6): 517-530.
    Bogdan, R.C., Biklen, S. K. (1992). Qualitative research for education: an introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
    Borko, H. & Livingston, C. (1989). Cognition and improvisation: Differences in mathematics instruction by expert and novice teachers. American Educational Research Journal 25(4): 473-498.
    Borko, H., & Shavelson, R. J. (1991).Teacher decision making. In B.F. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimension of Thinking and Cognitive Instruction (pp. 311-346). New Jersey: NCREL.
    Borko, H., Livingston, C., McCaleb, J. & Mauro, L. (1988). Student teachers’ planning and post-lesson reflections: Patterns and implications for teacher preparation. In J. Calderhead (Eds.), Teachers’ Professional Learning (pp. 65-83). London: The Falmer Press.
    Burns, A. (1996). Starting all over again: From teaching adults to teaching beginners. In D. Freeman & J.C. Richards (Eds.), Teacher Learning in Language Teaching. (pp. 154-177). Cambridge University Press.
    Calderhead, J. & Robson, M. (1991). Images of teaching: student teachers’ early conception of classroom practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7(1), 1-8.
    Calderhead, J. (1996) Teachers: Beliefs and Knowledge. In D.C. Berliner & R.C. Calfee (eds.) Handbook of Educational Psychology. New York: Macmillan.
    Carter, K. (1990). Teachers knowledge and learning to teach. In W. Robert Houston (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
    Chang, H. (1996). A senior high school English teacher’s professional knowledge for teaching (高中英文教師教學專業知識之探究). Master thesis, National Taiwan Normal University.
    Chang, Y. (1998). A study of pedagogical content knowledge for teachers of English in junior high schools(教師學科教學知識之研究—以國中英語為例). Master thesis, National Taiwan Normal University.
    Chang, Y. (2001) An expert teacher’s professional knowledge: A case study of an English teacher (專家教師專業教學知識之個案研究—以一位英語教師為例). Master thesis, National Taiwan Normal University.
    Chen, J. (2000). Alternative way for teacher growth: The conception of Mentoring Professional Growth. Journal of National Hualien Teachers College(花蓮師院學報), 10, 27-45.
    Clandinin, D. J. (1985). Personal practical knowledge: A study of teachers’ classroom images. Curriculum Inquiry, 15(4), 361-385.
    Clandinin, D.J. & Connelly, F.M. (1987). Teachers’ personal knowledge: What counts as in studies of the personal. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19, 487-500.
    Clark, C. M., & Peterson, P. L. (1986). Teachers’ thought processes. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of Research in Teaching (pp. 255-296). New York: Macmillan.
    Clark, C. M., & Yinger, R. J. (1987). Teacher planning. In J. Calderhead (Ed.), Exploring Teacher Thinking (pp. 84-103). London: Cassell.
    Clark, C. M., & Yinger, R.J. (1979). Teacher’s thinking. In P. L. Peterson & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Research on teaching. Berkeley, CA:McCutchan.
    Cochran, K. F., DeRuiter, J. A., & King, R. A. (1993). Pedagogical content knowing: An integrative model for teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 44(4), 263-272.
    Crooks, G. (1997).What influences what and how second and foreign language teachers teach? Modern Language Journal, 81(1), 67-79.
    Elbaz, F. (1981). The teacher’s “practical knowledge”: Report of a case study. Curriculum Inquiry, 11, 43-71.
    Ellis, R. (1994). The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Farrell, T. S. C. (2001). Tailoring Reflection to Individual Needs: A TESOL Case Study. Journal of Education in Teaching (JET), 21(1): 23-38.
    Floden, R. E., & Klinzing, H. G. (1990). What can research on teacher thinking contribute to teacher preparation? A second opinion. Educational Researcher, 19(5), 15-20.
    Flowerdew, J. (1998). Language learning experience in L2 teacher education. TESOL Quarterly, 32(3), 529-526.
    Flowerdew, J. (1999). The Practicum in L2 Teacher Education: A Hong Kong Case Study. TESOL Quarterly, 33(1), 141-145.
    Fogarty, J. L., Wang, M. C., & Creek, R. (1983). A descriptive study of experienced and novice teachers’ interactive instructional thoughts and actions. Journal of Educational Research, 77(1), 22-32
    Fox, D. L. (1991). From English major to English teacher: case studies of student teacher and their first year of teaching English. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Missouri-Columbia.
    Fradd, S. H. & Lee, O. (1998). Development of a knowledge base for ESOL teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14,(7), 761-733.
    Freeman, D. & Johnson, K. (1998). Reconceptualizing the knowledge-base of language teacher education. TESOL Quarterly, 32(3) 397-417.
    Freeman, D. & Richards, J. (1993). Conceptions of teaching and the education of second language teachers. TESOL Quarterly, 27(2). 193-216.
    Freeman, D. & Richards, J. (1996). Teacher learning in language teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Freeman, D. (1989). Teacher training, development, and decision making: A model of teaching and related strategies for language teacher education. TESOL Quarterly, 23(1), 27-45.
    Freeman, D. (1995). Asking “good” questions: Perspectives from qualitative research on practice, knowledge, and understanding in teacher education. TESOL Quarterly, 29(3), 581-585.
    Freeman, D. (1996). The “unstudied problem”: Research on teacher learning in language teaching. In D. Freeman & J.C. Richards (Eds.), Teacher learning in language teaching (pp. 351-378). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Fujiwara, B. (1996). Planning an advanced listening comprehension elective for Japanese college students. In K. Graves (Ed.), Teachers as Course Developers (pp. 151-175). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Gatbonton, E. (1999).Investigating experienced ESL teachers’ pedagogical knowledge. The Modern Language Journal, 83(1), 35-50.
    Golombek, P. R. (1998). A study of language teachers’ personal practical knowledge. TESOL Quarterly, 32(3), 447-464.
    Guo, Y. (1997). A case study of beginning junior high school science teacher’s thinking and representation of her pedagogical content knowledge. Master thesis, National Chunghwa Normal University.
    Halbach, A. (2000). Trainee change through teacher training: a case study in training English language teachers in Spain. Journal of Education for Teaching, 26, 139-147.
    Housner, L., & Griffey. D. (1985). Teacher cognition: Differences in planning and interactive decision making between experienced and inexperienced teachers. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 56, 45-53.
    Huang, Y. (1996). Student teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge in elementary mathematics (國小實習教師數學學科教學知識之個案研究). Master thesis, National Shin-chiu Teachers’ College.
    Jackson, P. W. (1968). Life in the classroom. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
    Johnson, K. (1992). Learning to teach: Instructional actions and decisions of preservice ESL teachers. TESOL Quarterly, 26(3), 507-535.
    Johnson, K. (1996). The role of theory in L2 teacher education. TESOL Quarterly 30(4), 765-771.
    Johnson, K. E. (1994). The emerging beliefs and instructional practices of pre-service English as a second language teachers. Teaching & Teacher Education, 10, 439-452.
    Johnston, S. (1992). Images: A way of understanding the practical knowledge of student teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 8(2), 123-136.
    Kagan, D. M. (1988). Teaching as clinical problem solving: A critical examination of the analogy and its implications. Review of Educational Research, 58(4), 482-505.
    Kagan, D. M. (1990). Ways of evaluating teacher cognition: Inferences concerning the goldilocks principle. Review of Educational Research, 60(3), 419-469.
    Kagan, D. M. (1992). Professional growth among preservice and beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 62(2), 129-169.
    Kwo, O. (1996). Learning to teach English in Hong Kong classrooms: Patterns of reflections. In D. Freeman & J.C. Richards (Eds.), Teacher Learning in Language Teaching. (pp. 295-319). Cambridge University Press.
    Larsen-Freeman, D. (1986). Techniques and principles in language teaching. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Lee, C. (1996). An interpretive research of two elementary school biology teachers’ belief. Master thesis, National Taiwan Normal University.
    Leinhardt, G. (1990). Capturing craft knowledge in teaching. Educational Researcher, 19(2), 18-25.
    Lin, J. (1997). A study of primary school teacher teaching thinking (國民小學教師教學思考之研究). Doctoral dissertation, National Taiwan Normal University.
    Liou, H.C. (2000). Reflective Practice and English Teacher Education: Theory, Research, and Implications. Taipei: The Crane Publishing Company.
    Livingston, C. C. (1990). Student teacher thinking and the student teaching curriculum. Doctoral dissertation. College Park: University of Maryland.
    Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher: A Sociological Study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Maxie, A. (2001). Developing early field experiences in a blended teacher education program: From policy to practice. Teacher Education Quarterly. 28(1), 115-122.
    McCutcheon, G. (1980). How do elementary school teachers plan? The nature of planning and influences on it. The Elementary School Journal, 81(1), 4-23.
    McNally, P. & Martin, S. (1998). Support and challenge in learning to teach: The role of mentor. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 26(1), 39-51.
    Meijer, P. C. (2001). Similarities and differences in teachers’ practical knowledge about teaching reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Research, 94(3),171-185.
    Meijer, P. C., Verloop, N. & Beijaard, D. (1999). Exploring language teachers’ practical knowledge about teaching reading comprehension. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15, 59-84.
    Meloth, M. S., Book, C., & Sivan, E. (1989). Teachers’ concepts of reading, reading instruction, and students’ concepts of reading. Journal of Teacher Education, 40(5), 33-39.
    Nelson, B. S. (1992).Teacher’s special knowledge. Educational Researcher, 21(9), 32-33.
    Numrich, C. (1996). On becoming a language teacher: Insights from diary studies. TESOL Quarterly, 30(1), 131-151.
    Omaggio-Hadley, A. (1993). Teaching Language in Context. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
    Pennington, M. C. (1995). The teacher change cycle. TESOL Quarterly, 29(4), 705-731.
    Powell, R. R. (1996). Constructing a personal practical philosophy for classroom curriculum: Case studies of second-career beginning teachers. Curriculum Inquiry, 26(2), 147-173.
    Prabhu, N. S. (1990). There is no best method -why? TESOL Quarterly, 24(2), 161-176.
    Prabhu, N. S. (1992). The dynamics of the language classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 26(2), 225-241.
    Raymond, H.C. (2000). Learning to teach foreign languages: Case studies of six preservice teachers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED44372.)
    Reynolds, A. (1992). What is competent beginning teaching? A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 62(1), 1-35.
    Richards, J. (1996). Teachers’ maxims in language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 30(2), 281-296.
    Richards, J. C. (1998). Beyond training: Perspectives on language teacher education. Cambridge University Press.
    Richards, J. C., & Ho, B. (1998). Reflective thinking through journal writing. In Richards, J.C. (Ed.), Beyond training: Perspectives on language teacher education. (pp. 153-170). Cambridge University Press.
    Richards, J. C., & Nunan, D. (Eds.)(1990) Second language teacher education. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Richards, J. C., & Pennington, M. (1998). The first year of teaching. In Richards, J.C. (Ed.), Beyond training: Perspectives on language teacher education. (pp. 173-190). Cambridge University Press.
    Richards, J. C., Li, B. & Tang, A. (1998). Exploring pedagogical reasoning skills. In Richards, J.C. (Ed.), Beyond training: Perspectives on language teacher education. (pp. 86-102). Cambridge University Press.
    Richards, J.C., Tung, P., & Ng, P. (1992). The culture of the English language teacher: A Hong Kong example. RELC Journal, 23(1), 81-103.
    Russell, T., & Munby, H. (1992). Teacher and teaching: From classroom to reflection. London: The Falmer Press.
    Russell, T. & Munby, H. (1991). Reframing: the role of experience in developing teachers’ professional knowledge on educational practices. In D. Schon (Ed.), The reflective turn: Case studies in and on educational practices (pp 164-187). New York: Teacher College Press.
    Russell, T. & Munby, H. (1992). Teachers and teaching: From classroom to reflection. London: The Falmer Press.
    Shan, W., Chang, H. & Su, S. (1999) An analysis of the pedagogical reasoning and actions of a senior high school English teacher (一位高中英文教師教學推理與行動過程的分析). 人文及社會學科教學通訊,10:2=56,176-184
    Shavelson, R. J., & Stern, P. (1981). Research on teachers’ pedagogical judgments, plans, decisions and behavior. Review of Educational Research, 51(4), 455-598.
    Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
    Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
    Shulman, L. S. (1992). Toward a pedagogy of cases. In J. Shulman (Ed.), Case methods in teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.
    Smith, D. B. (1996). Teacher decision making in the adult ESL classroom. In Freeman, D. & Richards, J. C. (Eds.), Teacher learning in language teaching. (pp. 197-216). Cambridge University Press.
    Sullivan, P. & Leder, G. C. (1992). Students’ influence on novice Australian teachers’ thoughts and actions regarding Mathematics Teaching: Two Case Studies. The Elementary School Journal, 92(5), 621-642.
    Tai, Y. (1999). The curricular planning process of English teachers in Taiwanese Secondary Schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, the University of Texas at Austin.
    Tai, Y. (2000). The interaction between English teachers’ knowledge and their curricular planning. Proceedings of the 17th Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the ROC (pp. 78-89). Taipei: The Crane Publishing Company. Soochow University, May 27.
    Taylor, P. H. (1970). How teachers plan their courses. London: National Foundation for Educational Research.
    Teng, J. (1999). Field experience and identification of junior high school EFL intern teachers: Two case studies (國中英語科實習教師實地經驗內涵與角色定位個案研究). Master thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, T(M) 462-88 683.
    Tuan, S. (1994). Exploring preactive, interactive, and postactive thinking of preservice chemistry teachers (探究職前化學教師教學前中後之思考—個案研究). NSC 82-0111-s-018-002-F.
    Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Tzeng, Y. (1999). An Investigation of science intern teachers’ conceptions and the thinking processes about instructional planning (理化實習教師教學計劃的認知與其思考歷程之研究). Master thesis, National Chunghwa Normal University.
    Vanpatten, B. (1997). How language teaching is constructed: Introduction to special issue. Modern Language Journal, 81, 1-5.
    Warner, D. R. (1987). An exploratory study to identify the distinctive features of experienced teachers’ thinking about teaching. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of New England, Aemidale NSW 2351, Australia.
    Weinstein, C. S. (1988). Preservice teachers: Expectations about the first year of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 1, 31-40.
    Westerman, D. A.(1991). Expert and novice teacher in decision making. Journal of Teacher Education, 42(4), 292-305.
    Westernman, D. A (1990). A study of expert and novice teacher decision making: An integrated approach. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 322128.)

    QR CODE