研究生: |
徐子晴 Tzu-ching Hsu |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
學前幼兒的語言能力與心智理論表現之相關研究 The relationship between language skills and understanding of theory of mind in young children |
指導教授: |
張鑑如
Chang, Chien-Ju |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
人類發展與家庭學系 Department of Human Development and Family Studies |
論文出版年: | 2009 |
畢業學年度: | 97 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 112 |
中文關鍵詞: | 學前幼兒 、語言能力 、心智理解 |
英文關鍵詞: | young children, language skills, theory of mind |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:1028 下載:150 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
中文摘要
本研究以57名三至五歲幼兒為對象,探討學前幼兒的語言能力與心智理解能力兩者之間的關係。其中語言能力除了以看無字圖畫書「青蛙,你在哪裡?」編故事的方式,收集敘事語料以分析幼兒的平均語句長度及複雜句,並進行「一般語言能力測驗(接受性語意能力及語用能力)」、「語法能力測驗」、「補語句型理解作業」的測試。而心智理解能力則以「錯誤相信作業」、「意向作業」及「外表真實區辨作業」來評估。研究發現,幼兒在一般語言能力、補語句型理解能力與心智理解表現之間存在關聯性。幼兒各層面的語言能力與心智理解能力之間的關聯性,會隨不同年齡層,而展現在不同的語言層面。如:與心智理解能力有顯著關聯性的語言層面,在三歲組的發現是「接受性『語用能力』」;在四歲組的發現是「接受性『語意能力』」與「接受性『語法能力』」;在五歲組的發現是「接受性『語意能力』」、「接受性『語法能力』」及「接受性『語用能力』」。此外,四歲組和五歲組的補語句型理解能力,均與心智理解能力有顯著的關聯。研究者依據上述之研究發現,提出相關建議,以供教育及後續研究之參考。
關鍵字:學前幼兒、語言能力、心智理解
The relationship between language skills and understanding of theory of mind in young children
Abstract
The purpose of the study was to investigate the relationship between language skills and understanding of theory of mind (TOM hereafter) in young children. Fifty-seven 3- to 5-year-olds were tested on general language (receptive semantic and pragmatic skills), receptive syntactic comprehension, complement-understanding, and TOM (including false-belief task, intention task and appearance-reality task). In addition, narratives of the book “Frog, where are you” were collected to analyze children’s mean language of utterance and production of complicated sentences. Results showed that the children’s general language ability and complement-understanding were positively related to their understanding of theory of mind. Receptive pragmatic ability of the 3-year-olds was found to be significantly correlated with their understanding of TOM. As for the 4-year-olds, the receptive semantic and syntactic skills were significantly correlated with their understanding of TOM. Receptive semantic, syntactic and pragmatic skills were all found to be significantly correlated with understanding of TOM in the 5-year-olds. Finding of this study also showed that complement-understanding ability in the four- and five-year-olds was significantly correlated with their understanding of TOM. Suggestions for future research and educational implications were proposed according to the findings of this study.
Key words:young children, language skills, theory of mind
參考文獻
壹、中文部份
吳信鳳 (2003)。幼兒之心智理論與心智語言發展個案研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告(NSC90-2413-H305-001)。
林寶貴、黃玉枝、黃桂君、宣崇慧 (2008)。修訂學前兒童語言障礙評量表。台北:國立台灣師範大學特殊研究中心。
保心怡 (2003)。幼兒對於心智理解作業的理解情形及運用故事活動介入的效果研究。國立台灣師範大學人類發展與家庭學系博士論文,未出版,台北市。
柯華葳、鍾榮富、張郁雯、幸曼玲、宋如瑜(2004)。華語文能力測驗編制—研究與實務。台北:遠流。
許月琴 (1999)。心智理論( theory of mind )在自閉症兒童溝通上的運用。國小特殊教育,27,57-59。
張欣戊 (1991)。學前兒童語言能力的測驗。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告(NSC79-0301-H002067)。
張欣戊 (1998)。騙與受騙:學前兒童的欺瞞能力。中華心理學刊,40,1-13。
張顯達 (1998)。平均語句長度在中文的應用。聽語會刊,13,36-48。
張顯達 (2006)。兒童語言的複雜句。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告 (NSC94-2411-H-002-040)。
張鑑如 (2006)。台灣與大陸兒童敘事能力之發展:腳本,生活經驗,與想像故事(1/3)。國立台灣師範大學新任教師專題研究成果報告。
鄒啟蓉,張顯達 (2007)。高功能自閉症兒童說故事能力與相關影響因素研究。特殊教育研究學刊,32,87-109。
廖信達 (2006)。幼兒對於假裝心智的理解及其一般心智理解之相關探究。國立台灣師範大學人類發展與家庭學系博士論文,未出版,台北市。
錡寶香 (2001)。國小低閱讀成就學生的口語述說能力:語言層面的分析。特殊教育學報,15,129-175。
簡淑真,周育如 (2005)。幼兒心智理論發展與語言發展之關係—漢語心智動詞與補語句法之檢視。教育心理學報,36,357-373。
貳、外文部份
Astington, J. W. (1993). The child’s discovery of the mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Astington, J. W. (2001). The future of theory-of-mind research: Understanding motivational states, the role of language, and real-world consequences. Child Development, 73 (3), 685-687.
Astington, J. W., & Gopnik, A. (1991). Theoretical explanations of children’s understanding of the mind. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9 , 7-31.
Astington, J. W., & Jenkins, J. M. (1999). A longitudinal study of the relation between language and theory-of-mind development. Development Psychology, 35 (5), 1311-1320.
Astington, J. W., & Lee, E. (1991). What do children know about intentional causation? Paper presented in the symposium Intention in the Child’s Theory of Mind at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Seattle, WA.
Bartsch, K., & Wellman, H. M. (1995). Children talk about the mind. NY: Oxford University Pess.
Bartsch, K., & Estes, D. (1996). Individual differences in children’s developing theory of mind and implications for metacognition. Learning and Individual Differences, 8 (4), 281-304.
Barcon-Cohen, S. (1988). Social and pragmatic deficits in autism: Cognitive or affective? Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 18, 379-402.
Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”? Cognition, 21, 37-46.
Brown, J. R., Donelan-McCall, N., Dunn, J. (1996). Why talk about mental states? The significance of children’s conversations with friends, siblings, and mothers. Child Development, 67, 836-849.
Bjorklund, D. F. (2000). Children’s thinking: Developmental function and individual differences (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Cheung, H., Chen, H. C., Creed, N., Ng, L., Wang, S. P., & Mo, L. (2004). Relative roles of general and complementation language in theory-of-mind development: Evidence from Cantonese and English. Child Development, 75 (4), 1155-1170.
Craig, H. K., Washington, J. A., & Thompson-Porter, C. (1998). Average C-unit lengths in the discourse of African American children from low-incomes, urban homes. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 41 (2), 433-444.
Cutting, A. L., & Dunn, J. (1999). Theory of mind, emotion understanding, language, and family background: Individual differences and interrelations. Child Development, 70 (4), 853-865.
Doherty, M. J. (2000). Children’s understanding of homonymy: Metalinguistic awareness and false belief. Journal of Child Language, 27, 367-392.
De Villiers, J. G., & de Villiers, P. A. (2000). Linguistic determinism and the understanding of false beliefs. In P. Mitchell & K. Riggs (Eds.), Children’s reasoning and the mind (pp.191-228). Hove, England: Psychology Press.
De Villiers, J. G., & Pyers J. E. (2002). Complements to cognition: a longitudinal study of the relationship between complex syntax and false-belief-understanding. Cognition Development, 17, 1037-1060.
Dunn, J., Brown, J., Slomkowski, C., Tesla, C., & Youngblade, L. (1991). Young children’s understanding of other people’s feelings and beliefs: Individual differences and their antecedents. Child Development, 62 (6), 1352-1366.
Farrar, M. J., & Maag, L. (2002). Early language development and the emergence of a theory of mind. First Language, 22, 197-213.
Feinfield, K. A., Lee, P. P., Flavell, E. R., Green, F. L., & Flavell, J. H. (1999). Young children’s understanding of intention. Cognition Developmental, 14, 463-486.
Feldman, C. F. (1988). Early forms of thought about thoughts: Some simple linguistic expressions of mental state. In J. W. Astington, P. L. Harris & D. R. Olson (Eds.), Developing theories of mind (pp.126-137). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Flavell, J. H. (1999). Cognitive development: children’s knowledge about the mind. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 21-45.
Flavell, J. H., Flavell, E. R., & Green, F. L. (1983). Development of the Appearance-Reality Distinction. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 95-120.
Flavell, J. H., & Miller, P. H. (1998). Social cognition. In D. Kuhn & R. Siegler (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (pp.851-898). New York: Wiley.
Gopnik, A., & Astington, J. W. (1988). Children’s understanding of representational change and its relation to the understanding of false belief and the appearance-reality distinction. Child Development, 59, 26-37.
Happé, G. E. (1995). The role of age and verbal ability in the theory of mind task performance of subjects with autism. Child Development, 66, 843-855.
Hogrefe, G. J., Wimmer. H., & Perner, J. (1986). Ignorance versus false belief: a developmental lag in attribution of epistemic states. Child Development, 57 (3), 567-582
Hughes, C., & Dunn, J. (1997). “Pretend you didn’t know”: Preschoolers’ talk about mental states in pretend play. Cognitive Development, 12, 477-499.
Hughes, C. (1998). Executive function in preschoolers: Links with theory of mind and verbal ability. British Journal of Development Psychology, 16 (2), 233-253.
Jenkins, J. M., & Astington, J. W. (1996). Cognitive factors and family structure associated with theory of mind development in young children. Development Psychology, 32 (1), 70-78.
Joseph, R. M., & Tager-Flusberg, H. (1999). Preschool children’s understanding of the desire and knowledge constraints on intended action. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17, 221-243.
Lalonde, C. E., & M. Chandler. (1995). False belief understanding goes to school: On the social-emotional consequences of coming early or late to a first theory of mind. Cognition and Emotion, 9, 167-185.
Lee. K., Olson, D. R., & Torrance, N. (1999). Chinese children’s understanding of false beliefs: The role of language. Journal of Child Language, 26, 1-26.
Leslie, A. M. (1987). Pretense and representation: The origins of “theory of mind.” Psychological Review, 94 (4), 412-426.
Lillard, A. (1998). Theories behind theories of mind. Human Development, 41 (1), 40-46
Limber, J. (1973). The genesis of complex sentences. In T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp.169-185) . New York: Academic Press.
Lohmann, H., & Tomasello, M. (2003). The role of language in the development of false belief understanding: A training study. Child Development, 74 (4), 1130-1144.
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Mayer, M. (1969). Frog, where are you? New York: Dial Press.
McAlister, A., & Peterson, C. (2007). A longitudinal study of child siblings and theory of mind development. Cognitive Development, 22, 258-270.
Milligan, K., Asttngton, J. W., & Dack, L. A. (2007). Language and theory of mind: Meta-analysis of the relation between language ability and false-belief understanding. Child Development, 78 (2), 622-646.
Moore, c., Pure, K., & Furrow. D. (1990). Children’s understanding of the modal expressions of speaker certainty and uncertainty and its relation to the development of a representational theory of mind. Child Development, 61 (3), 722-730.
Moore, C., & Frye, D. (1991). The acquisition and utility of theories of mind. In D. Frye & C. Moore (Eds.), Children’s theories of mind: Mental states and social understanding (pp.1-14). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Olson, D. R. (1988). On the origins of beliefs and other intentional states in children. In J. W. Astington, P. L. Harris & D. R. Olson, (Eds.), Developing theories of mind (pp.414-426). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Pan, B. A. (1994). Basic measures of child language. In J. L. Sokolov & C. E. Snow (Eds.), Handbook of research in language development using CHILDES (pp.26-49). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Perner, J., Leekam, S., & Wimmer, H. (1987). Three-year-olds’ difficulty with false belief: The case for a conceptual deficit. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 5, 125-137.
Perner, J., Ruffman, T., & Leekam, S. R. (1994). Theory of mind is contagious: You catch it from your sibs. Child Development, 65, 1228-1238.
Peterson, C. C., & Siegal, M. (1995). Deafness, conversation and theory of mind. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 36 (3), 459-474.
Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1, 515-526.
Ruffman, T., Slade, L., Rowlandson, K., Rumsey. C., & Garnham, A. (2003). How language relates to belief, desire, and emotion understanding. Cognitive Development, 18, 139-158.
Sabbagh, M. A., & Taylor, M. (2000). Neural correlates of theory-of-mind reasoning: An event-related potential study. American Psychology Society, 11 (1), 46-50.
Shatz, M., Wellman, H. M., & Silber, S. (1983). The acquisition of mental verbs: A systematic investigation of the first reference to mental state. Cognition, 14 (3), 301-321.
Tardif, T., & Wellman, H. M. (2000). Acquisition of mental state language in Mandarin-and Cantonese-speaking children. Developmental Psychology, 36 (1), 25-43.
Tager-Flusberg H. (2005). Putting words together: Morphology and syntax in the preschool years. In J. B. Gleason (Ed.), The development of language (pp.148-190). New York: Macmillan.
Watson, A. C., Painter, K. M., & Bornstein, M. H. (2001), Longitudinal relations between 2-year-olds’ language and 4-year-olds’ theory of mind. Journal of Cognition and Development, 2(4), 449-457.
Welch-Ross, M. K. (1997). Mother-child participation in conversation about the past: Relation to preschoolers’ theory of mind. Developmental Psychology, 33 (4), 618-629.
Wellman, H. M. (1990). The child’s theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wellman, H. M., & Bartsch, K. (1988). Young children’s reasoning about beliefs. Cognition, 30, 239-277.
Wellman, H. M., & Hickling, A.K. (1994).The mind’s “I”: Children’s conception of the mind as an active agent. Child Development, 65 (6), 1564-1580.
Wellman, H. M., Cross, D., & Watson, J. (2001). Meta-Analysis of theory-of-mind development: The truth about false belief. Child Development, 72 (3), 655-684.
Wimmer, H., & Hartl, M. (1991). Against the Cartesian view on mind: Young children’s difficulty with own false beliefs. British Journal of Develomental Psychology, 9, 125-138.
Wimmer, H., & Perner, J., (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13, 103-128.
Wu, H. F.(吳信鳳)(2000). Mind and Language: Children’s development of mind and linguistic representations. Taipei, Taiwan: Crane Publishing .