簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 欉珊慈
Tsung, Shan-tzu
論文名稱: 探討高職學生社經地位、英語學習動機、後設認知單字學習策略,及英語單字學習之關係
The Relationship Among Socio-economic Status, Learning Motivation, Use of Metacognitive Vocabulary Learning Strategies, and English Vocabulary Acquisition
指導教授: 程玉秀
Cheng, Yuh-Show
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 英語學系
Department of English
論文出版年: 2012
畢業學年度: 100
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 104
中文關鍵詞: 社經地位英語學習動機後設認知單字學習策略單字學習成就
英文關鍵詞: socio-economic status, English learning motivation, metacognitive vocabulary learning strategy, vocabulary achievement
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:492下載:53
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究探討家庭社經地位對於高職生英語學習動機(包含動機強度及種類)、後設認知單字學習策略運用、及單字成就的影響,並且探究在排除社經地位的影響之下,英語學習動機及後設認知單字學習策略使用對單字成就的解釋力何者較高。本研究共邀請224位來自彰化一所高職一年級的受訪者參與,請受訪者填寫三份問卷—基本資料問卷(包含社經地位項目)、學習動機問卷(包含動機強度及種類)、後設認知單字學習策略使用問卷—及一份單字成就測驗。收集到的資料運用多因子變異數分析、單因子變異數分析、及階層廻歸做統計分析以回應上述兩項研究目的。分析結果顯示社經地位對英語學習動機(包含動機強度及種類)、後設認知單字學習策略運用、及單字成就的影響皆不顯著,亦即不同社經地位的學生在這三個變項上的表現並沒有顯著差異。此外,當控制了社經地位對單字成就的影響時,英語學習動機強度是唯一能顯著地預測單字成就的自變項,其他的自變項如學習動機種類及後設認知單字學習策略運用則皆無法顯著預測高職學生的英語單字成就。由此可知,對高職學生來說,學習動機強度對英文單字成就的影響力遠勝於動機種類以及運用後設認知學習策略與否,因此,文末提出了和提升學生學習動機強度相關的教學建議給高職英語教師們參考。本研究盼能增進高職英語教師對學生英語學習的了解:(1)社經地位對英語學習的影響微乎其微,(2)學習動機強度對於單字學習有顯著的預測力。

    The present study intends to reveal the role of socio-economic status (SES) in English learning motivation (including intensity and types), metacognitive vocabulary learning strategy use, and lexical achievement. It also explores the explanatory power of motivation and metacognitive strategy use for second language vocabulary acquisition, with the effect of SES controlled. A total of 224 participants were recruited and asked to complete four research instruments: a background information questionnaire that probed into parents’ socio-economic status, a motivational questionnaire, a metacognitive strategy use questionnaire, and a vocabulary test. Inferential statistics such as MANOVA, one-way ANOVA, and hierarchical regression were employed. The results uncovered an insignificant effect of SES on English learning motivation, metacognitive vocabulary learning strategy use, and lexical achievement. In addition, motivational intensity was found to be the only predictor that significantly explained vocabulary achievement while metacognitive strategy use and motive types did not account for lexical learning to a significant level. Some pedagogical suggestions for language teachers on how to enhance learners’ motivational intensity are provided at the end of the study.

    中文摘要 2 ABSTRACT 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS 5 LIST OF TABLES 8 LIST OF FIGURES 9 CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 10 Background 10 Socioeconomic Status and Language Learning 11 Motivation and Language Achievement 14 Metacognitive Strategies and Language Achievement 15 Purpose of the Present Study 17 Significance of the Study 17 Definition of Terms 18 Socio-economic Status 18 Motivation 18 Metacognitive Vocabulary Learning Strategies 19 CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW 20 Socioeconomic Status 20 SES and Learning Achievement 20 SES and Learning Motivation 23 SES and Use of Learning Strategy 24 Motivation 27 Definition of Motivation 27 Empirical Studies on Motivation and Language Achievement 34 Metacognitive Strategies 35 Definition of Metacognition 35 Importance of Metacognitive Strategies 38 Metacognitive Strategies and Vocabulary Learning 38 CHAPTER THREE METHODS 46 Participants 46 Instruments 47 Background Information Questionnaire 47 Motivational Questionnaire 48 Metacognitive Strategy Questionnaire 50 Vocabulary Knowledge Test 52 Procedure 53 Data Collection Procedure 53 Data Analysis Procedure 54 CHAPTER FOUR RESULTS 56 Reliabilities of the Instruments 56 Participants’ Overall Performance on Instruments 57 Effects of SES on Motivation, Metacognitive Strategy Use, and Vocabulary Acquisition 59 Explanatory Power of SES, Motivation, and Metacognitive Strategy in Vocabulary Acquisition 63 CHAPTER FIVE DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION 67 The Effect of Socio-economic Status 67 Socio-economic Status and Motivation 67 Socio-economic Status and Metacognitive Vocabulary Strategy 71 Socio-economic Status and Vocabulary Achievement 72 Explanatory Factors in Vocabulary Achievement 75 Metacognitive Strategies and Vocabulary Achievement 75 Motivation and Vocabulary Achievement 77 Pedagogical Implications 79 Suggestions for Future Research 81 Limitations 83 Conclusion 83 REFERENCES 85 APPENDICES 97 Appendix A: Background Information Questionnaire 97 Appendix B: Questionnaire on Motivation 99 Appendix C: Questionnaire on Metacognitive Vocabulary Strategies 101 Appendix D: Vocabulary Knowledge Test 102

    張武昌 (民 91)。國中基本學力測驗英語科雙峰現象形成原因之探討。取自 http://www.bctest.ntnu.edu.tw/flying/flying11-20/flying16-5.htm
    張武昌、周中天、陳純音、葉錫南、林正昌、許月貴等 (民 93)。國民中學學生基本學力測驗英語雙峰現象暨改進措施。取自 http://192.192.169.230/cgi-bin/edu_project/d_display?home=&path=/ap/edu_project/toc&sysid=000000668&qval=%AD%5E%BBy%B1%D0%BE%C7&phonetic=0&fuzzy=0&password=&ori_db=&search_field=keyword
    陳淑玫 (民98)。低社經背景學童具高學業成就者之個案研究 (碩士論文)。國立東華大學,花蓮縣。
    Abdelhafez, A. M. M. (2006). The effect of a suggested training program in some metacognitive language learning strategies on developing listening and reading comprehension of university EFL students. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED498262)
    Ahmed, M. O. (1989). Vocabulary learning strategies. In P. Meara (Ed.), Beyond words (pp. 3-14). London: CILT.
    Akyol, G., Sungur, S., & Tekkaya, C. (2010). The contribution of cognitive and metacognitive strategy use to students' science achievement. Educational Research and Evaluation, 16(1), 1-21.
    Alexander, K. L., Entwisle, D. R., & Olson, L. S. (2001). School, achievement, and inequality: A seasonal perspective. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(2), 171-191.
    Altman, R. (1997). Oral production of vocabulary: A case study. In J. Coady & T. Huckin (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition (pp. 69-97). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Anderson, N. J. (2002b). Using telescopes, microscopes, and kaleidoscopes to put metacongnition into perspective. TESOL Matters, 12(4), 1-2.
    Baird, J. R. (1990). Metacognition, purposeful enquiry and conceptual change. In E. Hegarty-Hazel (Ed.), The student laboratory and the science curriculum (pp. 183-200). London: Routledge.
    Battle, J. (2002). Longitudinal analysis of academic achievement among a nationwide sample of Hispanic students in one-versus dual-parent households. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 24, 430-447.
    Battle, J., & Lewis, M. (2002). The increasing significance of class: The relative effects of race and socioeconomic status on academic achievement. Journal of Poverty, 6, 21-35.
    Bernaus, M., & Gardner, R. C. (2008). Teacher motivation strategies, student perceptions, student motivation, and English achievement. The Modern Language Journal, 92(3), 387-401.
    Brown, H. D. (1991). TESOL at twenty-five: What are the issues? TESOL Quarterly, 25(2), 245-259.
    Brown, T. S., & Perry, F. L., Jr. . (1991). A comparison of three learning strategies for ESL vocabulary acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 25(1), 17-32
    Carr, M. (2010). The importance of metacognition for conceptual change and strategy use in mathematics. In H. S. Waters, W. Schneider & J. G. Borkowski (Eds.), Metacognition, strategy use, and instruction. NY: Guilford Press.
    Chang, C.-Y. (2006). A study on the effects of vocabulary learning strategy instruction on vocabulary learning of senior high school students in Taiwan (Unpublished master thesis). National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei.
    Chao, H.-l. (2004). The effects of English abstract word instruction on high and low English achievers in junior high school (Unpublished master thesis). National Kaohsiung Normal University, Kaohsiung.
    Chen, M. H., Gualberto, P. J., & Tameta, C. L. (2009). The development of metacognitive reading awareness inventory. TESOL Journal, 1, 43-57.
    Chen, Y.-P. (2004). Investigation Of 7th graders' EFL proficiency discrepancy in relation to their family background (Unpublished master thesis). National Kaoshiung Normal University, Kaoshing.
    Clement, R., Gardner, R. C., & Smythe, P. C. (1977). Motivational variables in second language acquisition: A study of francophones learning English. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 9, 123-133.
    Clement, R., Gardner, R. C., & Smythe, P. C. (1980). Social and individual factors in second language acquisition. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 12, 293-302.
    Coady, J. (1997). L2 vocabulary acquisition through extensive reading. In J. Coady & T. Huckin (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition (pp. 225-237). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Coşkun, A. (2010). The effect of metacognitive strategy training on the listening performance of beginner students. Novitas-ROYAL, 4(1), 35-50.
    Crnic, K., & Lamberty, G. (1994). Reconsidering school readiness: Conceptual and applied perspectives. Early Education and Development 5(2), 99-105.
    Crookes, G., & Schmidt, R. W. (1991). Motivation: Reopening the research agenda. Language Learning, 41, 469-512.
    Csizér, K., & Dörnyei, Z. (2005). Language learners' motivational profiles and their motivated learning behavior. Language Learning, 55, 613-659.
    Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.
    Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
    DEECD. (2006). Understanding the needs of students from low socio-economic backgrounds [Web organization blog]. Retrieved from http://www.education.vic.
    gov.au/management/schooloperations/equity/disadvantage.htm
    Dornyei, Z. (1990). Conceptualizing motivation in foreign-language learning. Language Learning, 40, 45-78.
    Dornyei, Z. (1994). Motivation and motivating in the foreign language classroom. Modern Language Journal, 78, 273-284.
    Dornyei, Z. (2001). Teaching and researching motivation. Harlow: Longman.
    Downey, D. B., von Hippel, P. T., & Broh, B. A. (2004). Are school the great equalizer? Cognitive inequality during the summer months and the school year. American Sociological Review, 69(5), 613-635.
    Elias, H., & Long, A. B. (1984). A correlational study of achievement motivation and pupils' performance in the standard five assessment examination from selected schools in Selangor. Pertanika, 7(2), 31-38.
    Ellis, R. (1995). Modified oral input and the acquisition of word meaning. Applied Linguistics, 16, 409-441.
    Fan, M.-Y. (2003). Frequency of use, perceived usefulness, and actual usefulness of second language vocabulary strategies: A study of Hong Kong learners. The Modern Language Journal, 87, 222-240.
    Farrell, T. S. (2001). Teaching reading strategies: "It takes time!”. Reading in a Foreign Language Awareness, 13, 631-646.
    Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231-236). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911.
    Flavell, J. H., & Wellman, H. M. (1977). Metamemory. In R. V. Kail & J. W. Hagen (Eds.), Perspectives on the development of memory and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Gan, Z., Humphreys, G., & Hamp-Lyons, L. (2004). Understanding successful and unsuccessful EFL students in Chinese universities. The Modern Language Journal, 88(2), 229-244.
    Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. London: Edward Arnold Publishers.
    Gardner, R. C. (2000). Correlation, causation, motivation, and second language acquisition. Canadian Psychology, 41(1), 10-24.
    Gardner, R. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (1991). An instrumental motivation in language study: Who says it isn't effective? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 266-272.
    Gardner, R. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (1992). A student's contributions to second language acquisition. Part 1: Cognitive variables. Language Teaching, 25, 211-220.
    Gardner, R. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (1993a). A student's contribution to second language acquisition. Part II: Affective variables. Language Teaching, 26, 1-11.
    Gardner, R. C., & Masgoret, A.-M. (2003). Attitudes, motivation, and second language learning: A meta-analysis of studies conducted by Gardner and associates. Language Learning, 53(1), 123-163.
    Gardner, R. C., Masgoret, A.-M., Tennant, J., & Mihic, L. (2004). Integrative motivation: changes during a year-long intermediate-level language course. Language Learning, 54(1), 1-34.
    Gardner, R. C., & Smythe, P. C. (1981). On the development of the Attitude/Motivation Test Battery. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 37, 510-525.
    Gardner, R. C., & Tremblay, P. F. (1998). Specificity of affective variables and the trait/state conceptualization of motivation in second language acquisition. In R. Agnihotri, A. L. Khanna & I. Sachdev (Eds.), Social psychological perspectives on second language learning. New Delhi, India: Sage.
    Gayton, A. (2010). Socioeconomic status and language-learning motivation: To what extent does the former influence the latter? Scottish Languages Review, 22, 17-28.
    Gottfried, A. E. (1985). Academic intrinsic motivation in elementary and junior high school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 631-635.
    Graham, S. (1997). Effective language learning. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
    Gu, Y., & Johnson, R. K. (1996). Vocabulary learning strategies and language learning outcomes. Language Learning, 46, 643-679.
    Hallingshead, A. (1957). Two factor index of social position. New Heaven: Yale.
    Hay, I., Elias, G., Fielding-Barnsley, R., Homel, R., & Freiberg, K. (2007). Language delays, reading delays, and learning difficulties: Interactive elements requiring multidimensional programming. Journal of Learning Disabilties, 40(5), 400-409.
    Hsu, H.-A. (2009). Effects of famiy socioecomomic status on senior graduates' English proficiency (Unpublished master thesis). Southern Taiwan University, Tainan.
    Hu, H.-Y. (2007). An investigation into Taiwanese vocational high school students' use of vocabulary learning strategies (Unpublished master thesis). National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei.
    Hulstijn, J. (1997). Mnemonic methods in foreign language vocabulary learning: Theoretical considerations and pedagogical implications. In J. Coady & T. Huckin (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition (pp. 203-224). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Jacobson, M. J., Maouri, C., Mishra, P., & Kolar, C. (1995). Learning with hypertext learning environments: Theory, design, and research. Journal of Multimedia and Hypermedia, 4, 321-364.
    Jiang, J.-Y. (2001). Effects of vocabulary learning strategy instruction on senior high school students with different English achievement (Unpublished master thesis). National Kaohsiung Normal University of Education, Kaohsiung.
    Kan, H.-H. (2004). A study on the English learning motivation of Taiwanese students from grades 3 to 9 (Unpublished master thesis). National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei.
    Karaarslan, G., & Sungur, S. (2011). Elementary students' self-efficacy beliefs in science: Role of grade level, gender, and socio-economic status. Science Education International, 22(1), 72-79.
    Keith, T. Z., & Anderson, E. S. (1997). A longitudinal test of a model for at-risk high school students. The Journal of Educational Research, 90(5), 259-268.
    Kiran, S. (2010, November 14). Language development and socioeconomic status [Web blog message]. Retrieved from http://jottedlines.com/psychology/language-
    development-and-socioeconomic-status/
    Koutsoulis, M. K., & Campbell, J. R. (2001). Family processes affect students' motivation, and science and math achievement in Cypriot high schools. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 108-127.
    Kuhn, D. (2000). Metacognitive development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(5), 178-181.
    Lee, C.-J. (2009). Relationships among parents' economic status, education background, their children's English proficiency, and kindergarten tuition in Kaoshiung City (Unpublished master thesis). National Kaoshiung Normal University, Kaoshiung.
    Lett, J., & O'Mara, F. E. (1990). Predictors of success in an intensive language learning context: Correlates of language learning at the defense language institute foreign language center. In T. S. Parry & C. W. Stansfield (Eds.), Language aptitude reconsidered (pp. 222-260). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.
    Lin, L. (2001). Taiwanese children's EFL vocabulary learning strategies (Unpublished master thesis). National Chinhua University, Hsinchu.
    Lin, M.-H. (1999). The effect of the strategy training of memorizing English vocabulary on junior high students (Unpublished master thesis). National Kaohsiung Normal University, Kaohsiung.
    Lu, M.-C. (2002). A study of the effects of vocabulary learning strategy instruction on junior high school students in Taiwan (Unpublished master thesis). National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei.
    MacIntyre, P. D. (2002). Motivation, anxiety and emotion in second language acquisition. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 45-68). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
    Mitchell, J. V., Jr. (1992). Interrelationships and predictive efficacy for indices of intrinsic, extrinsic, and self-assessed motivation for learning. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 25(3), 149-155.
    Nation, P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Nation, P. (2007). Retrieved from http://www.victoria.ac.nz/lals/staff/paul-nation.aspx
    Nieh, P.-L. (2004). Elementary graduates' EFL proficiency in Taiwan: A factorial analysis (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). National Kaoshiung Normal University, Kaoshiung.
    Noels, K. A. (2001b). Learning Spanish as a second language: Learners' orientations and perceptions of teachers' communicative style. Language Learning, 51, 107-144.
    Noels, K. A., Clément, R., & Pelletier, L. (2001). Intrinsic, extrinsic, and integrative orientations of French Canadian learners of English. Canadian Modern Language Review, 57, 424-442.
    Noels, K. A., Pelletier, L., Clément, R., & Vallerand, R. J. (2000). Why are you learning a second language? Motivational orientations and Self-Determination Theory. Language Learning, 50, 57-85.
    O' Neil, H. F., Jr., & Abedi, J. (1996). Reliability and validity of a state metacognitive inventory: Potential for alternative assessment. Journal of Educational Research, 89, 234-245.
    O'Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
    Oakes, J. M., & Rossi, P. H. (2003). The measurement of SES in health research: Current practice and steps toward a new approach. Social Science & Medicine, 56, 769-784.
    Oakland, T., Wechsler, S., Benusan, E., & Stafford, M. (1994). The construct and measurement of achievement among Brazilian children. School Psychology International, 15, 133-143.
    Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle and Heinle/Cengage.
    Oxford, R. L. (2011). Teaching and researching language learning strategies. United Kingdom: Pearson Education Limited.
    Oxford, R. L., & Shearin, J. (1994). Language learning motivation: Expanding the theoretical framework. Modern Language Journal, 78, 12-28.
    Pappas, S., Ginsburg, H., & Jiang, M. (2003). SES differences for young children's metacognition in the context of mathematical problem solving. Cognitive Development, 18(3), 431-450.
    Peng, I.-N. (2001). EFL motivation and strategy use among Taiwanese senior high school learners (Unpublished master thesis). National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei.
    Pintrich, P. R., Wolters, C., & Baxter, G. (2000). Assessing metacognition and self-regulated learning. In G. Schraw & J. Impara (Eds.), Issues in the measurement of metacognition (pp. 43-97). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
    Ramey, S. L., & Ramey, C. T. (1994). The transition to school: Why the first few years matter for a lifetime. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(30), 194-198.
    Rasekh, Z. E., & Ranjbary, R. (2003). Metacognitive strategy training for vocabulary learning. TESL-EJ, 7(2), 1-15.
    Rubin, J. (2001). Language learner self-management. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 11, 25-37.
    Sanaoui, R. (1995). Adult learners' approaches to learning vocabulary in second languages. The Modern Language Journal, 79(1), 15-28.
    Schmitt, N. (1997). Vocabulary learning strategies. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition, and pedagogy (pp. 199-227). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Sheorey, R., & Mokhtari, K. (2001). Differences in the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native and nonnative readers. System, 29(4), 431-449.
    Stipek, D. J. (2001). Pathways to constructive lives: The importance of early school success. In A. Bohart & D. J. Stipek (Eds.), Constructive and destructive behavior: Implications for family, school, and society (pp. 291-315). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
    Stipek, D. J., & Ryan, R. H. (1997). Economically disadvantaged preschoolers: Ready to learn but further to go. Developmental Psychology, 33(4), 711-723.
    Stoffer, I. (1995). University foreign language students' choice of vocabulary learning strategies as related to individual difference variables (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Alabama, Alabama.
    Tocco, T. S. (1971). Students' attitudes, perceived parental attitudes, and socio-economic status as predictors of junior high school mathematics achievement. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED052017)
    Tremblay, P. F., & Gardner, R. C. (1995). Expanding the motivation construct in language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 79(4), 505-520.
    Tremblay, P. F., Goldberg, M. P., & Gardner, R. C. (1995). Trait and state motivation and the acquisition of Hebrew vocabulary. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 27, 356-370.
    Veenman, M. V. J. (1993). Intellectual ability and metacognitive skill: Determinants of discovery learning in computerized learning environment. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
    Walker, D., Greenwood, C., Hart, B., & Carta, J. (1994). Prediction of school outcomes based on early language production and socioeconomic factors. Child Development, 65, 606 - 621.
    Warden, C. A., & Lin, H. J. (2000). Existence of integrative motivation in an Asian EFL setting. Foreign Language Annals, 33(5), 535-547.
    Wasik, B. A., Bond, M. A., & Hindman, A. (2002). Creating opportunities for discourse: Language and literacy development in economically disadvantaged children. In O. N. Saracho & B. Spodek (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives in literacy in early childhood education (pp. 53-76). Greenwich, CT: IAP.
    White, C. J. (1995). Autonomy and srategy use in distant foreign language learning. System, 23(2), 207-221.
    White, K. R. (1982). The relation between socioeconomic status and academic achievement. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 461-481.
    Williams, M., & Burden, R. L. (1997). Psychology for language teachers: A social constructive approach. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
    Winne, P., & Hadwin, A. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. Hacker, J. Dunlosky & A. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 227-304). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Zhang, L. J. (2001). Awareness in reading: EFL students' metacognitive knowledge of reading strategies in an acquisition-poor environment. Language Awareness, 10, 268-288.
    Zhang, L. J. (2008). Constructivist pedagogy in strategic reading instruction: Exploring pathways to learner development in the English as a second language (ESL) classrooms. Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences, 36, 89-116.
    Zhang, L. J., Gu, Y. P., & Hu, G. (2008). A cognitive perspective on Singaporean bilingual children's use of reading strategies in learning to read in English. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 245-271.
    Zhang, L. J., & Wu, A. (2009). Chinese senior high school EFL students' metacognitive awareness and reading-strategy use. Reading in a Foreign Language, 21(1), 37-59.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE