簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 謝晴年
Shieh, Ching-Nien
論文名稱: 金融保險業安靜離職現象之探討:主管與部屬的觀點
A Study on Quiet Quitting in the Finance and Insurance Industry: The Perspectives of Supervisors and Employees
指導教授: 陳怡靜
Chen, Mavis Yi-Ching
口試委員: 陳怡靜
Chen, Mavis Yi-Ching
陳淑媛
Chen, Shu-Yuan
胡昌亞
Hu, Chang-Ya
口試日期: 2024/07/16
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 科技應用與人力資源發展學系人力資源發展碩士在職專班
Department of Technology Application and Human Resource Development_Continuing Education Master's Program of Human Resource Development
論文出版年: 2024
畢業學年度: 112
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 105
中文關鍵詞: 安靜離職金融保險業
英文關鍵詞: Quiet Quitting, Finance & Insurance Industry
研究方法: 個案研究法半結構式訪談法
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202401271
論文種類: 代替論文:專業實務報告(專業實務類)
相關次數: 點閱:144下載:18
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 人才發展是組織永續發展的基礎,亦是人力資源部門重視的議題。2022年7月「安靜離職」一詞因Tik Tok上分享的影片引發廣泛的討論,並引起了企業人力資源工作者及管理階層的關注。本研究採個案研究法,並以金融保險產業主管職及非主管職的18名正職員工為訪談對象,從主管與員工的觀點探討員工安靜離職的原因及其影響。研究發現,安靜離職行為模式可分為三個層次,分別為無聲的抗議、消極的面對或抵抗、職場怠工行為;安靜離職的原因大致區分為缺乏回饋、支持及認可、工作發展不如預期、缺乏職業發展動力、工作遭受不公平對待、對於組織、文化或工作氛圍的不滿以及對未知、不確定性的恐懼這六類,而主管與部屬的觀點則因關注範疇不同而有部分差異。本研究針對研究結果擬定結論及實務建議,期望藉此幫助企業管理者制定有效的人力資源管理策略,以吸引與保留優秀人才、減少員工流失並提升組織的穩定性和競爭力。

    Talent development is the foundation of the sustainable development of an organization, and it is also an important issue for the human resources department. In July 2022, the term " Quiet Quitting " was widely discussed due to a video shared on Tik Tok, and aroused the attention of corporate HR workers and management. This study adopts the case study method, and 18 full-time employees in the financial and insurance industry who are supervisors and non-supervisors are interviewed, to explore the reasons and effects of employees' quiet quitting from the perspective of supervisors and employees. The study found that the quiet turnover behavior pattern can be divided into three levels, which are silent protest, negative face or resistance, and workplace sabotage. The reasons for quiet quitting are roughly divided into six categories: lack of feedback, support and recognition, work development is not as expected, lack of career development motivation, unfair treatment at work, dissatisfaction with the organization, culture or working atmosphere, and fear of the unknown and uncertainty. The views of supervisors and subordinates vary according to different areas of concern. Based on the research results, this study draws conclusions and practical recommendations, hoping to help enterprise managers develop effective human resource management strategies to attract and retain outstanding talents, reduce employee turnover, and enhance organizational stability and competitiveness.

    第一章 緒論1 第一節 研究背景與動機1 第二節 研究目的與待答問題3 第三節 名詞解釋3 第四節 研究範圍與限制4 第二章 文獻探討 5 第一節 安靜離職 5 第三章 研究設計與實施19 第一節個案研究方法19 第二節 研究對象 20 第三節 研究工具 20 第四節 資料處理與分析29 第四章 研究結果 31 第五章 結論與建議53 第一節 結論與討論53 第二節 實務建議 66 第三節 研究限制與未來研究建議71 參考文獻73 附錄85

    104職場力(2023年5月)。「安靜離職」是什麼?團隊出現這種心態時該如何應對?(What is "quiet quitting"? How should teams respond when this state of mind emerges?)。104職場力。https://blog.104.com.tw/what-is-quiet-quitting/
    Business Digest(2023年3月)。安靜離職是什麼?促成美國安靜離職潮的原因(Quiet Resignation: What is Quiet Resignation? Factors Behind the Quiet Resignation Trend in the United States)。商業熱話出版(Business Digest)。https://businessdigest.io/%E5%95%86%E6%A5%AD%E7%86%B1%E8%A9%B1/%E5%AE%89%E9%9D%9C%E9%9B%A2%E8%81%B7-%E5%AE%89%E9%9D%9C%E9%9B%A2%E8%81%B7%E6%98%AF%E4%BB%80%E9%BA%BC-%E4%BF%83%E6%88%90%E7%BE%8E%E5%9C%8B%E5%AE%89%E9%9D%9C%E9%9B%A2%E8%81%B7%E6%BD%AE%E7%9A%84%E5%8E%9F%E5%9B%A0
    Voice Tube(2022年9月)。【職場英文】「安靜離職」Quiet Quitting 為何爆紅?一起認識新世代流行職場用語!(Understanding New Generation Popular Workplace Terms: Why is "Quiet Quitting" Trending in English?)。Voice Tube。https://tw.blog.voicetube.com/archives/84600
    行政院主計總處(2021年1月)。行業統計分類(第11次修正)。中華民國統計資訊網。https://www.stat.gov.tw/StandardIndustrialClassificationContent.aspx?n=3144&sms=11195&RID=11&PID=Sw==&Level=1
    王瑤芬(2005)。國際觀光旅館餐飲部門高階主管職涯發展及其影響因素之研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/n5z7je
    王喬可(2023)。組織文化對於安靜離職的影響-以心理契約履行和情感性組織承諾為序列中介變項(博士論文)。國立中央大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/z5a8gq
    王重仁、陳心懿(2021)。斜槓人生:多元職涯態度工作者之職涯適應力,職涯滿意度與專業承諾間之研究。商略學報,13(3),219-234。
    方曉雲(2019)。以個案研究法探討新創微型文創之商業模式─以墨仙堂為例(博士論文)。國立臺東大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/6hq46a
    丘周剛、田靜婷、林欣怡、林俊宏、高文彬、徐克成、劉敏熙、羅潔伶(2010)。現代人力資源管理:新趨勢與發展(第三版)丘周剛(主編)。新文京開發出版股份有限公司。
    石銳(2003)。人力資源管理與職涯發展。揚智文化公司。
    宋美鈺(2023)工作新常態?安靜離職的理論構念與量表發展(博士論文)。逢甲大學https://hdl.handle.net/11296/cra3gm
    李瑞華(2023年1月)。靜默放棄的挑戰。哈佛商業評論 Taiwan 2023年1月號-人才管理哪裡出了錯。https://www.hbrtaiwan.com/article/21712/the-challenge-to-quiet-quitting
    李肇興(2015)。兩岸華人世代差異在心理契約違背之研究(博士論文)。逢甲大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/5847r8
    吳斯茜、鍾孟娟(2023)。基層警察正安靜離職嗎?從工作敬業觀點探討 (Are Police Officers Quiet Quitting? From Work Engagement Perspective)。中央警察大學警察行政管理學報,(19),79-92。
    林虹伶(2016)。不同世代護理人員的工作價值觀與激勵方式偏好之研究-以新北市各血液透析中心為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/nd9wxd
    林芷均(2023)。組織公平對安靜離職傾向之影響-以領導成員交換關係為中介變項(碩士論文)。國立中央大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/77jg97
    金樹人(1997)。生涯諮商與輔導。東華書局。
    金融監督管理委員會金融科技發展與創新中心(2022)。12-114年金融科技人才供需調查及推估結果摘要-金融業之金融科技人才。國家發展委員會。產業人力供需資訊網。https://theme.ndc.gov.tw/manpower/cp.aspx?n=8FDEB38F0F17B561&s=F734B2434DF29C7E
    孫靖玟(2020)。職場衝突的因應與轉化學習:對不同世代公務人員之初探(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/t9bp9n
    郭昱宏(2023)居家辦公員工安靜離職與工作生活平衡、居家辦公限制及心理抽離間關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/46b9up
    晉麗明(2022年11月)。企業如何因應「躺平主義」及「在職離職」。104獵才月刊NO.160。https://hunter.104.com.tw/zh-tw/articles/91102
    許智偉(2017)。「七年級生」世代公部門約僱人員生涯發展之研究-以教育部所屬博物館類社教機構為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/j6uq65
    許智豪(2005)。Y世代、X世代和嬰兒潮世代學習風格分析之研究(碩士論文)。淡江大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/9qzm8c
    許嘉栩(2022) 多元職涯轉換後可轉移技能的延續及工作價值的展現(碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/4g2wq7
    郭憲誌(2023年4月)。躺平主義、安靜離職風潮下的年輕世代,企業該如何面對與因應?。經理人。https://www.managertoday.com.tw/columns/view/66659
    陳美子(2023)。消費品藝術注入效果對消費者知覺價值影響之研究(博士論文)。大葉大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/6h9su4
    換日線(2023年7月)。美國正流行「大聲離職」:愈不滿愈高調!他們的辭職為何這麼「戲劇性」?。換日線。https://crossing.cw.com.tw/index.php/article/17939
    彭敏惠(2020)。探討轉換型領導對員工工作鑲嵌及離職傾向之影響—以多元職涯態度做為干擾(碩士論文)。國立中央大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/rzj32m
    黃振恭(2008)。不同世代國民小學教師工作價值觀,角色知覺與教學自我效能和專業表現之研究(博士論文)。國立嘉義大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/mg9fdk
    經理人(2023年8月)。蓋洛普調查:安靜離職還不夠!為什麼近20%員工更想要「大聲離職」?。經理人。https://www.gvm.com.tw/article/105031
    經理人月刊(2023年10月)。當員工安靜離職時,企業年損近百億元!破壞者、溫和脫離者⋯該如何讓他們找回熱情?.職場/工作術. 取自 https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/77108/-six-types-employees-
    樂羽嘉(2022年8月)。「安靜離職」過來人:我後悔到現在。("Quiet Resignation" From a Survivor: I Regret It to This Day)。天下Web only (CommonWealth Web only)。https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5122596
    樓永堅、蔡東峻、潘志偉、別蓮蒂(2003)。社會人際因素對消費者行為的影響。國立空中大學。https://ah.nccu.edu.tw/item?item_id=79733&locale=zh-TW-tw
    蔡瓅萱(2022年9月)。不爽不要做?真的不多做!「安靜離職」風潮激發年輕人強烈共鳴(Don't Want to Do it If You're Not Happy? Really Not Doing Much! "Quiet Resignation" Trend Inspires Strong Resonance Among Young People)。Dailyview 網路溫度計(Dailyview Internet Thermometer)。https://dailyview.tw/popular/detail/17006
    謝丹慈、柯勝雄、何佳陽(2023年7月4日)。缺工缺才!主計總處:金融保險業「留人才最積極」。TVBS新聞網。https://news.tvbs.com.tw/life/2179487
    蘇淑麗(2005)。不同世代國小教師人格特質與工作價值觀之相關研究(博士論文)。國立花蓮師範學院。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/smw8qw
    Alwin, D. F., & McCammon, R. J. (2007). Rethinking generations. Research in Human Development, 4(3-4), 219-237. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427600701663072
    Amanda Nieweler (2022, September 10). Latest Trend: 'Quiet Quitting' - Should You Worry? Whistleblower Security. [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://blog.whistleblowersecurity.com/latest-trend-quiet-quitting-should-you-worry
    Bandura, A. (1969). Social-learning theory of identificatory processes. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 213-262).
    Barford, I. N., & Hester, P. T. (2011). Analysis of generation Y workforce motivation using multiattribute utility theory. Defense Acquisition Research Journal, 18(1), 64-80. https://doi.org/10.22594/dau.11-64.80
    Bauer, T. N., Bodner, T., Erdogan, B., Truxillo, D. M., & Tucker, J. S. (2007). Newcomer Adjustment During Organizational Socialization: A Meta-Analytic Review of Antecedents, Outcomes, and Methods [Article]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3), 707-721. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.707
    Berkup, S. B. (2014). Working with generations X and Y in generation Z period: Management of different generations in business life. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(19), 218. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n19p218
    Bloch, D. P. (2005). Complexity, chaos, and nonlinear dynamics: A new perspective on career development theory. The Career Development Quarterly, 53(3), 194-207. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.2005.tb00660.x
    Jo, C. (2022, October 28). Quiet Quitting Surges in Finance as It Gains Steam Across Sectors. Bloomberg.
    Bush, M. (2022, Fall). Quiet quitting: Four strategies to correct the course. AMA Quarterly, 8(3), 8-11.
    Cennamo, L., & Gardner, D. (2008). Generational differences in work values, outcomes and person-organisation values fit. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(8), 891–906.
    Chen, C. P. (1998). Understanding career development: A convergence of perspectives. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 50(3), 437-461. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636829800200053
    Cousin, G. (2005). Case study research. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 29(3), 421-427. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260500290967
    Crumpacker, M., & Crumpacker, J. D. (2007). Succession planning and generational stereotypes: Should HR consider age-based values and attitudes a relevant factor or a passing fad? Public Personnel Management, 36(4), 349–369. https://doi.org/10.1177/009102600703600403
    Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
    Everett, C. (2023). How can IT leaders address quiet quitting? Computer Weekly, 15–19.
    Francis, T., & Hoefel, F. (2018). True Gen’: Generation Z and its implications for companies. McKinsey & Company, 12, 1-10.
    Gallup. (2021, May 19). The quiet quitting is real. Gallup Workplace. https://www.gallup.com/workplace/398306/quiet-quitting-real.aspx?_trms=0ce89f6798d0a8bd.1686801162106
    Grant, A. (2021, April 19). There’s a name for the blah you’re feeling: It’s called languishing. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/19/well/mind/covid-mental-health-languishing.html
    Holland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments. Psychological Assessment Resources.
    Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
    Kachhap, V., & Singh, T. (2024). Quiet quitting: A comprehensive exploration of hidden problems. Development and Learning in Organizations.
    Kicheva, T. (2017). Management of employees from different generations-Challenge for Bulgarian managers and HR professionals. Economic Alternatives, 1(1), 103-121.
    Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
    Kupperschmidt, B. R. (2000). Multigeneration employees: Strategies for effective management. The Health Care Manager, 19(1), 65-76.
    Klotz, A. C., & Bolino, M. C. (2022, September 15). When Quiet Quitting Is Worse Than the Real Thing [Article]. Harvard Business Review Digital Articles, 1-5.
    McCrindle, M. (2006). Word Up: A lexicon of Generations Y & Z: A guide to communicating with them. The ABC of XYZ.
    Myers, I. B. (1962). The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: Manual (1962). Consulting Psychologists Press. https://doi.org/10.1037/14404-000
    PersolKelly. (2023). Why We Should Quit Quiet Quitting. Retrieved from https://www.persolkelly.com.tw/zh-tw/news/why-we-should-quit-quiet-quitting/59599/
    Sayers, R. (2007). The right staff from X to Y. Library Management, 28(8/9), 474–487.
    Schein, E. H. (1974). Career anchors and career paths: A panel study of management school graduates.
    Schein, E. H., & Schein, E. (1978). Career dynamics: Matching individual and organizational needs (Vol. 6834). Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.
    Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. SAGE Publications.
    Serenko, A. (2023). The human capital management perspective on quiet quitting: Recommendations for employees, managers, and national policymakers. Journal of Knowledge Management.
    Solomon, M. R. (1995). Consumer Behavior (4th ed.). Prentice-Hall, pp. 469-489.
    Valura. (2022). Quiet quitting: Profit and loss [PDF]. Retrieved from https://www.valura.net/Web/En/ArticleQuietQuittingProfitLoss.pdf
    Whistleblower Security. (2022, September 10). Latest trend: 'Quiet quitting'—Should you worry? [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://blog.whistleblowersecurity.com/latest-trend-quiet-quitting-should-you-worry
    Williams, K. C., & Page, R. A. (2011). Marketing to the generations. Journal of Behavioral Studies in Business, 3(1), 37-53.
    Wootton, B. (1953). Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge. By Karl Mannheim. Edited by Paul Kecskemeti. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
    Hanisch, K. A., & Hulin, C. L. (1990). Job attitudes and organizational withdrawal: An examination of retirement and other voluntary withdrawal behaviors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 37(1), 60–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(90)90007-O
    Lehman, W. E. K., & Simpson, D. D. (1992). Employee substance use and on-the-job behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(3), 309-321. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.77.3.309
    Hom, P. W., Griffeth, R. W., & Sellaro, C. L. (1984). The validity of Mobley's (1977) model of employee turnover. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34(2), 141-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(84)90001-1
    Spector, P. E., & Fox, S. (2005). The stressor-emotion model of counterproductive work behavior. In S. Fox & P. E. Spector (Eds.), Counterproductive work behavior: Investigations of actors and targets (pp. 151–174). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10893-007

    下載圖示
    QR CODE