消費者作為企業發展的重要因素，他們的個人環保意識影響其個人行為，永續企業發展能否帶動消費者對永續環境的重視，進而推動ESG政策發展。在消費行為中考量到該產品是否符合永續環境原則，因此消費者的角色在永續發展過程中相當重要。本次研究以TPB模型作為研究理論，主要用於瞭解、預測個人行為。其個人行為意向受三個主要因素影響，即對環保的態度、主觀規範以及知覺行為控制，本次研究利用個人行為意向透過正念消費以及永續生產兩個項目，並透過社會責任調節環保的態度、主觀規範和知覺行為控制三者與正念消費以及永續生產之間的關係，從而探索消費者對永續產品的購買意願。
本次研究一共回收415份問卷回答，透過計算偏最小平方迴歸，處理各變數之間的多重共線性，從實驗室結果中顯示，消費者環保的態度透過正念消費以及永續生產影響永續購買意願呈顯著的正向關係，主觀規範透過正念消費影響永續購買意願呈顯著的正向關係，而知覺行為控制透過永續生產影響永續發展購買意願呈顯著的正向關係。而消費者的社會責任作為調節情況下，知覺行為控制透過社會責任調節後，對正念消費和永續生產呈正向的顯著關係，而環保的態度透過社會責任作調節後，對永續生產呈正向的顯著關係。
本研究針對消費者個人對永續購買行為探討，提供企業或品牌了解消費者對永續產品的購買意願，結果表明在了解消費者購買永續產品的行為中，消費者個人意識是為重要的因素，企業在考慮相關的永續行銷策略時，可多加考慮消費者的購買意識方面的情形。另外正念消費興永續生產兩項對永續購買意願均有正向的顯著影響，因此透過研究說明正念消費興永續生產對永續相關的經濟發展是有幫助的，而消費者與社會責任的互相影響下，其個人的知覺行為亦受到影響，社會對於永續經濟發展的促進，可透過增強消費者對社會責任的認知，促進加深企業與消費者之間的聯繫，有效加強永續經濟的進步。

Consumers are a crucial factor in corporate development, and their individual environmental awareness significantly influences their behavior. This study explores whether the development of ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) by companies can enhance consumer awareness and consequently drive the progress of ESG policies. It examines whether consumers consider ESG principles in their purchasing behavior, highlighting the important role of consumers in ESG development.
This research utilizes the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) as its theoretical framework to understand and predict individual behavior. According to TPB, personal behavioral intentions are influenced by three main factors: attitudes towards the environment, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control. The study investigates these intentions through two key areas: mindful consumption and sustainable production, while also examining how social responsibility moderates the relationships between environmental attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, and the two areas of focus, ultimately affecting consumer willingness to purchase ESG products.
A total of 415 survey responses were collected for this study. Using Partial Least Squares Regression (PLS-SEM) to address multicollinearity among variables, the results indicate significant positive relationships. Specifically, consumer attitudes towards the environment significantly influence ESG purchasing intentions through mindful consumption and sustainable production. Subjective norms significantly influence ESG purchasing intentions through mindful consumption, while perceived behavioral control significantly influences ESG purchasing intentions through sustainable production. When considering social responsibility as a moderating factor, perceived behavioral control shows a significant positive relationship with mindful consumption and sustainable production. Additionally, environmental attitudes moderated by social responsibility show a significant positive relationship with sustainable production.
Consumers are a crucial factor in corporate development, and their individual environmental awareness significantly influences their behavior. This study explores whether the development of ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) by companies can enhance consumer awareness and consequently drive the progress of sustainable policies. It examines whether consumers consider sustainable principles in their purchasing behavior, highlighting the important role of consumers in sustainable development.

This research utilizes the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) as its theoretical framework to understand and predict individual behavior. According to TPB, personal behavioral intentions are influenced by three main factors: attitudes towards the environment, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control. The study investigates these intentions through two key areas: mindful consumption and sustainable production, while also examining how social responsibility moderates the relationships between environmental attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, and the two areas of focus, ultimately affecting consumer willingness to purchase sustainable products.

A total of 415 survey responses were collected for this study. Using Partial Least Squares Regression (PLS-SEM) to address multicollinearity among variables, the results indicate significant positive relationships. Specifically, consumer attitudes towards the environment significantly influence sustainable purchasing intentions through mindful consumption and sustainable production. Subjective norms significantly influence sustainable purchasing intentions through mindful consumption, while perceived behavioral control significantly influences sustainable purchasing intentions through sustainable production. When considering social responsibility as a moderating factor, perceived behavioral control shows a significant positive relationship with mindful consumption and sustainable production. Additionally, environmental attitudes moderated by social responsibility show a significant positive relationship with sustainable production.

This research provides valuable insights into consumer behavior towards sustainable purchases, offering businesses and brands a better understanding of consumer willingness to buy sustainable products. The findings suggest that consumer awareness is a critical factor in purchasing sustainable products. Businesses should consider consumer awareness when developing sustainable marketing strategies. Moreover, both mindful consumption and sustainable production have significant positive impacts on sustainable purchasing intentions. This study demonstrates the beneficial effects of mindful consumption and sustainable production on sustainable-related economic development. The interplay between consumers and social responsibility also influences individual perceived behavior, suggesting that enhancing consumer awareness of social responsibility can promote stronger connections between businesses and consumers, thereby advancing sustainable economic progress.

Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Akinwande, M. O., Dikko, H. G., & Samson, A. (2015). Variance Inflation Factor: As a Condition for the Inclusion of Suppressor Variable(s) in Regression Analysis. Open Journal of Statistics, 05(07), Article 07. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojs.2015.57075
Amoako, G. K., Dzogbenuku, R. K., & Abubakari, A. (2020). Do green knowledge and attitude influence the youth’s green purchasing? Theory of planned behavior. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 69(8), 1609–1626. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-12-2019-0595
Borin, N., Cerf, D. C., & Krishnan, R. (n.d.). Consumer effects of environmental impact in product labeling.
Calderon-Monge, E., Pastor-Sanz, I., & Sendra Garcia, F. J. (2020). Analysis of sustainable consumer behavior as a business opportunity. Journal of Business Research, 120, 74–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.07.039
Davis, S. L., Rives, L. M., & Ruiz-de-Maya, S. (2021). Personal social responsibility: Scale development and validation. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(2), 763–775. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2086
Duong, C. D. (2021). Big Five personality traits and green consumption: Bridging the attitude-intention-behavior gap. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 34(6), 1123–1144. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-04-2021-0276
Emekci, S. (2019). Green consumption behaviours of consumers within the scope of TPB. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 36(3), 410–417. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-05-2018-2694
Evans, S., Vladimirova, D., Holgado, M., Van Fossen, K., Yang, M., Silva, E. A., & Barlow, C. Y. (2017). Business model innovation for sustainability: Towards a unified perspective for creation of sustainable business models. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(5), 597–608.
Fischer, D., Stanszus, L., Geiger, S., Grossman, P., & Schrader, U. (2017). Mindfulness and sustainable consumption: A systematic literature review of research approaches and findings. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162, 544–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.007
Floyd, F. J., & Widaman, K. F. (n.d.). Factor Analysisin the Development and Refinement of Clinical Assessment Instruments. FACTOR ANALYSIS.
Gadenne, D., Sharma, B., Kerr, D., & Smith, T. (2011). The influence of consumers’ environmental beliefs and attitudes on energy saving behaviours. Energy Policy, 39(12), 7684–7694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.09.002
Galbreth, M. R., & Ghosh, B. (2013). Competition and Sustainability: The Impact of Consumer Awareness. Decision Sciences, 44(1), 127–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2012.00395.x
Gupta, S., & Verma, H. (2019). Mindful Consumption Behaviour: Scale Development and Validation (SSRN Scholarly Paper 3907446). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3907446
Işık, C., Ongan, S., Islam, H., Jabeen, G., & Pinzon, S. (n.d.). Is economic growth in East Asia pacific and South Asia ESG factors based and aligned growth? Sustainable Development, n/a(n/a). https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2910
Jain, S. (2020). Assessing the moderating effect of subjective norm on luxury purchase intention: A study of Gen Y consumers in India. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 48(5), 517–536. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-02-2019-0042
Jain, S. K., & Goel, P. (2012). Consumer Attitudes towards Business Firms’ Marketing Philosophy, Consumerism and Government Regulations in India: A Cross-sectional Analysis. Vision, 16(4), 253–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262912460184
Jones III, R. J., Reilly, T. M., Cox, M. Z., & Cole, B. M. (2017). Gender Makes a Difference: Investigating Consumer Purchasing Behavior and Attitudes Toward Corporate Social Responsibility Policies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(2), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1401
Kasuya, E. (2019). On the use of r and r squared in correlation and regression. Ecological Research, 34(1), 235–236. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1703.1011
Kraft, P., Rise, J., Sutton, S., & Røysamb, E. (2005). Perceived difficulty in the theory of planned behaviour: Perceived behavioural control or affective attitude? British Journal of Social Psychology, 44(3), 479–496. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466604X17533
Krajnc, D., & Glavič, P. (2003). Indicators of sustainable production. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 5(3), 279–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-003-0221-z
LaCaille, L. (2013). Theory of Reasoned Action. In M. D. Gellman & J. R. Turner (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine (pp. 1964–1967). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1005-9_1619
Lin, H.-Y., & Hsu, M.-H. (2015). Using Social Cognitive Theory to Investigate Green Consumer Behavior. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(5), 326–343. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1820
Luo, Z., Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Papadopoulos, T., Hazen, B., & Roubaud, D. (2017). Sustainable production framework for cement manufacturing firms: A behavioural perspective. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 78, 495–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.069
Matharu, M., Jain, R., & Kamboj, S. (2020). Understanding the impact of lifestyle on sustainable consumption behavior: A sharing economy perspective. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 32(1), 20–40. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-02-2020-0036
Milne, G. R., Villarroel Ordenes, F., & Kaplan, B. (2020). Mindful Consumption: Three Consumer Segment Views. Australasian Marketing Journal, 28(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2019.09.003
Mishra, D. P., & Sharma, P. (2014). Green Marketing: Challenges and Opportunities for Business. 7(1).
Mohammad, J., Quoquab, F., & Mohamed Sadom, N. Z. (2020). Mindful consumption of second-hand clothing: The role of eWOM, attitude and consumer engagement. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 25(3), 482–510. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-05-2020-0080
Nam, C., Dong, H., & Lee, Y.-A. (2017). Factors influencing consumers’ purchase intention of green sportswear. Fashion and Textiles, 4(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40691-017-0091-3
Niinimäki, K., & Hassi, L. (2011). Emerging design strategies in sustainable production and consumption of textiles and clothing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(16), 1876–1883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.04.020
Onurlubaş, E. (2018). The Mediating Role of Environmental Attitude on the Impact of Environmental Concern on Green Product Purchasing Intention. EMAJ: Emerging Markets Journal, 8(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.5195/emaj.2018.158
Pattberg, P., & Widerberg, O. (2015). Theorising Global Environmental Governance: Key Findings and Future Questions. Millennium, 43(2), 684–705. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829814561773
Paul, J., Modi, A., & Patel, J. (2016). Predicting green product consumption using theory of planned behavior and reasoned action. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 29, 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.11.006
Peterson, M., Minton, E. A., Liu, R. L., & Bartholomew, D. E. (2021). Sustainable Marketing and Consumer Support for Sustainable Businsses. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.10.018
Resnik, S. (2022). A Qualitative Study of Mindfulness, Sustainable Consumption and Consumer Well-Being and their Interrelationships. Economic and Business Review, 24(4), 260–277. https://doi.org/10.15458/2335-4216.1313
Revicki, D. (2014). Internal Consistency Reliability. In A. C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research (pp. 3305–3306). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_1494
Richter, N., & Hunecke, M. (2020). Facets of Mindfulness in Stages of Behavior Change Toward Organic Food Consumption. Mindfulness, 11(6), 1354–1369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-020-01351-4
Roemer （, E., Schuberth （, F., & Henseler （, J. (2021). HTMT2–an improved criterion for assessing discriminant validity in structural equation modeling. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 121(12), 2637–2650. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-02-2021-0082
Roh, T., Seok, J., & Kim, Y. (2022). Unveiling ways to reach organic purchase: Green perceived value, perceived knowledge, attitude, subjective norm, and trust. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 67, 102988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.102988
Shen, M., & Wang, J. (2022). The Impact of Pro-environmental Awareness Components on Green Consumption Behavior: The Moderation Effect of Consumer Perceived Cost, Policy Incentives, and Face Culture. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.580823
Soni, M., & Dawar, U. (2018). Exploring consumer social responsibility (CnSR): A key element for sustainable environment. 2018 Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences (ASET), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASET.2018.8376753
Sun, J. (2023). The Analysis of the Effects of Purchasing Behaviour and Attitude on Green Marketing among the Post-90s. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences, 53(1), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/53/20230778
Syahfitri, J., Firman, H., Redjeki, S., & Sriyati, S. (2019). Confirmatory factor analysis of critical thinking disposition test in university biology. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1280(3), 032001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1280/3/032001
Tewari, A., Srivastava, S., Gangwar, D., & Verma, V. C. (2021). Young consumers’ purchase intention toward organic food: Exploring the role of mindfulness. British Food Journal, 124(1), 78–98. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-12-2020-1162
Tiwari, S., Malik, C., & Singhal, N. (2017). Antecedents of consumer environmental attitude and intention to purchase green products: Moderating role of perceived product necessity. International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, 20, 259. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJETM.2017.10012377
Trivedi, R. H., Patel, J. D., & Acharya, N. (2018). Causality analysis of media influence on environmental attitude, intention and behaviors leading to green purchasing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 196, 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.024
Trudel, R. (2019). Sustainable consumer behavior. Consumer Psychology Review, 2(1), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/arcp.1045
Ujwary-Gil, A., & Nalepka, A. (2018). Business and Non-profit Organizations Facing Increased Competition and Growing Customers’ Demands: Volume 17. Institute of Economics, Polish Academy of Sciences.
Vitell, S. J. (2015). A Case for Consumer Social Responsibility (CnSR): Including a Selected Review of Consumer Ethics/Social Responsibility Research. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(4), 767–774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2110-2
Wang, W., Tie, F. H., Omar, I. M. B., Chen, W., Li, P., & Shi, C. (2023). An Empirical Study on the Creative Learning Environment Fostering Student Creativity: A Multiple Mediation Analysis Using Smart PLS 4. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 13(4), 10. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2023-0085
Webb, D., Soutar, G. N., Mazzarol, T., & Saldaris, P. (2013). Self-determination theory and consumer behavioural change: Evidence from a household energy-saving behaviour study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 35, 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.04.003
Zhang, L., Xu, M., Chen, H., Li, Y., & Chen, S. (2022). Globalization, Green Economy and Environmental Challenges: State of the Art Review for Practical Implications. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.870271