研究生: |
葉政 |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
國三學生的知識認識信念、自然科學習風格與自然科學習成就之分析研究 |
指導教授: |
楊芳瑩
Yang, Fang-Ying |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
生命科學系 Department of Life Science |
論文出版年: | 2009 |
畢業學年度: | 97 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 150 |
中文關鍵詞: | 個人知識認識信念 、國中基本學力測驗 、學習風格 |
英文關鍵詞: | personal epistemology, Basic Competence Test for Junior High School, learning style |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:195 下載:31 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
摘 要
本研究嘗試透過問卷調查的方式,藉由國三學生「個人知識認識信念」、「個人學習風格」、「不同背景」等層面來探討影響國三學生自然科基本學力測驗成績的因素。研究對象為基隆市、桃園縣兩所國中,14個班級施測樣本共452份,有效問卷是415份。其中知識認識信念問卷共38題;學習風格問卷共30題,學生學習風格主要分為:深度式學習型學習風格、表面式學習型學習風格、為成就學習型學習風格。
研究結果顯示:(一) 國三學生的知識認識信念可知學生認為簡單知識,但較不認為是快速學習。國三女學生認為簡單知識的信念顯著高於男學生。喜好文科的國三學生認為簡單知識的顯著高於喜好理科的同學。國三學生上網時數越多者,越不認同簡單知識信念。(二) 國三學生的學習風格主要為成就學習型,策略、操作式學習型風格較少。國三女學生的表面式學習風格及為成就學習型風格顯著高於男學生。喜好文科的國三學生其表面式學習型風格及為成就學習型風格顯著高於喜好理科的同學。每週上網時數較少的國三學生,其為成就學習型風格顯著高於每週上網時數較多的同學。(三)文理都喜好的國三學生及喜好理科的國三學生其國中基本學力測驗成績也顯著高於喜好文科的同學。(四)國三學生每週上網時數中,在國中基本學力測驗間並無顯著差異。(五)藉由知識認識信念與學習風格可用來預測國中基本學力測驗自然科成績表現。
以上是本研究針對國三學生在自然科學習中,知識認識信念、學習風格與學習成就間所給予的建議,期能提供教學者與學習者更有效率的進行教學與學習。
關鍵詞:個人知識認識信念、學習風格、國中基本學力測驗
參考文獻
一、中文部份
岳修平譯(1998)。教學心理學-學習的認知基礎。台北:遠流。
余民寧(2002)。教育測驗與評量-成就測驗與教學評量。台北:心理出版社。
李蓉欣(2004)。中學地球科學教師教學後設認知能力與個人知識認識信念之相
關研究碩士論文。
吳明隆(2004)。SPSS統計應用實務。松岡出版社。
吳穎沺(2003)。建構主義式的科學學習活動對國小高年級學生認知結構之影響。
國立交通大學教育研究所碩士論文。
呂虹霖(2004)。國中學生知識信念、父母期望與學業成就之研究。國立彰化師
範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
林紀慧(2004)。國小學童知識信念的發展以及學業成績之相關研究。台中師院
學報,15,191-206。
洪逸文(2007)。影響教師資訊融入教學因素之探討:以中學地球科學教師為例。
國立台灣師範大學地球科學研究所博士論文。
何宗翰(1998)。主修領域背景對大學生知識信念與學習策略的影響。國立政治
大學教育研究所碩士論文。未出版,臺北市。
陳志昌(2003)。不同教學方式下學習成效之研究-網大教學與網大輔助傳統教學
之比較。國立中山大學傳播管理研究所碩士論文。
陳萩卿(2004)。知識信念影響學習運作模式之驗證暨「調整知識信念的教學策
略」對國中生學習歷程影響之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系博士論文。
黃克文(1996)。認知負荷與個人特質及學習成就之關聯,國立台北師範學院國
民教育研究所碩士論文。
杜義文(2004)。國二學生的網路搜尋策略與成果:檢視知識觀所扮演的角色。
國立交通大學教育研究所碩士論文。
王文科、王智弘(2005)教育研究法。台北市:五南。
王雅伶(2003)。學習風格理論融入國二理化教學之個案研究。國立彰化師範大學
科學教育研究所碩士學位論文。
王淑芬(2003)。國小學童學習風格與多元智能知相關研究。屏東師範學院數理教
育研究所碩士論文。
田耐青(譯)(2002)。統整多元智慧與學習風格。(原作者:H.F.Silver,R.W.Strong
& M.J.Perini)台北市:遠流(原出版年:2000)。
張春興(1995)。教育心理學:三化取向的理論與實踐。台北市:東華。
吳玉明(1997)。建構式教學策略中不同學習型態學生學習的探討。國立新竹
師範院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
吳百薰(1998)。國小學生學習風格相關因素之研究。國立台中師範學院國民
教育研究所碩士學位論文, 未出版。
吳知賢(1987)。不同類型國民小學學生之智能與學業成就之關係。台南師專
學報,20,191- 211。
吳沂木(2004)。資訊科技融入『自然與生活科技』的3D虛擬實境教學之探究—
以電與磁教學為例。國立台南大學教師在職進修自然碩士學位班碩
士論文, 未出版。
吳美瑩(2004)。粒子發展史融入自然與生活科技教學對國中學生學習成就及科學
本質觀影響之研究。國立台灣師範大學化學系在職進修碩士學位班
碩士論文。
吳明清(1991)。教育研究:基本觀念與方法之分析。台北市:五南。
何榮桂、王振德、陳美芳、蔡崇建(1984)。國中資優學生學習行為初步研究。
資優季刊,12,17- 22。
汪文俊(2003)。我國高職工業類學生學習風格及對教學風格偏好之研究。國
立台北科技大學技術及職業教育研究所碩士論文。
林麗琳(1995)。國小資優班與普通班學生學習風格、學習適應與學業成就關
係之研究。國立台南師範學院初等教育研究所碩士學位論文, 未
出版。
柯麗卿(2004)。國中資優生獨立研究與學習風格的關係及獨立研究學習成效
相關因素之研究。國立高雄範大學特殊教育系碩士論文。
施皇羽(2004)。國小高年級不同學習風格學童其科學實驗活動自覺問題解決
能力與科學學習成效之關係研究。國立嘉義大學科學教育研究所碩
士論文。
施賀建(2003)。學習風格與方式對學習成效之影響-以互動式與否為基礎。中
原大學資訊管理學系碩士學位論文。
陳江水(2003)。國中學生家庭環境人格特質社會技巧與學業成就之相關研究。
國立彰化師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
陳曉佳(2004)。台灣地區國中學生文化資本、習性與學業成就之關係。國立
台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
蔡淑薇(2004)。高中職學生學習風格、自我調整學習與學業成就之關係。國
立彰化範大學輔導與諮商系碩士論文。
劉信雄(1992)。國小學生認知風格、學習策略、自我效能與學業成就關係之
研究。政治大學教育研究所博士論文。
邱皓政(2000)。社會與行為科學的量化研究與統計分析:SPSS中文視窗版資
料分析範例解析。台北:五南。
許秋瑾(2003)。學習風格與教材呈現對國小學童學習溶液酸鹼性之研究。台
南師院學院教師在職進修資訊碩士學位班碩士論文。
呂劍英(2009)。國三學生的學習風格與自然科學習興趣之研究。台灣師範大學生命科學系在職進修碩士班碩士論文, 未出版。
二、英文部份
Baxter Magolda, (1992). Knowing and reasoning in college: Gender-related patterns in students’ intellectual development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Baxter Magolda, (2004). Evolution of a constructivist conceptualization of
epistemological reflection. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 31-42.
Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women’s
ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. New York: Basic
Books
Bendixen, L. D. (2002). A process model of epistemic belief change. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 191-208). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bendixen, L. D., & Rule, D. C. (2004). An integrative approach to personal epistemology: A guiding model. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 69-80.
Bendixen, L. D., Schraw, G., & Dunkle, M. E. (1998). Epistemic beliefs and moral
reasoning. The Journal of Psychology, 132(2), 187-200.
Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in
Education, 5(1), 7-74.
Crawley, F. E. (1990). Intentions of science teachers to use investigative teaching methods: Atest of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 685-697.
Crawley, F. E., & Koballa, T. R. (March, 1992). Attitude/behavior change in science
education: Parti-models and methods. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of
the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Boston, MA.
Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction.
Cognition and Instruction, 8(4), 293-332.
Clarebout, G., Elen, J., Luyten., & Bamps, H. (2001). Assessing epistemological
beliefs:Schommer’s questionnaire revisited. Educational Research and
Evaluation, 1, (7) 1, 53-77.
Clark, J. M. & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational
Psychology Review, 3(3), 149-210.
Clinchy, B. M. (2002). Revisiting women’s ways of knowing. In B. K. Hofer & P. R.
Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about
knowledge and knowing (pp. 63-87). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Cooper, H., & Findley, M. (1982). Expected effect sizes: Estimates for statistical
power analysis in social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,
8, 168-173.
DeBacker, T. K., Beesley, D., & Thoma, H. M. (2008). The challenge of measuring
epistemic beliefs: An analysis of three self-report instruments. Journal of
Experimental Education, 76(3), 281-312.
Hammer, D., & Elby, A. (2002). On the form of a personal epistemology. In B. K.
Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs
about knowledge and knowing (pp. 169-190). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hofer, B. K. (2000). Dimensionality and disciplinary differences in personal
epistemology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 378-405.
Hofer, B. K. (2001). Personal epistemology research: Implications for learning and teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology Review, 13(4), 353-383.
Hofer, B. K. (2004a). Introduction: Paradigmatic approaches to personal epistemology. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 1-3.
Hofer, B. K. (2004b). Epistemological understanding as a meta-cognitive process: Thinking aloud during online searching. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 43-55.
Hofer, B. K. (2004c). Exploring the dimensions of personal epistemology in differing classroom context: Student interpretations during the first year of college. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(2), 129-163.
Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88-140.
Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (Eds.) (2002). Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Jehng, J. J, Johnson, S. D., & Anderson, R. C. (1993). Schooling and students’ epistemological beliefs about learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18, 23-35.
King, p. M., & Kitchener, K. S. (2004). Reflective judgment: Theory and research on the development of epistemic assumptions through adulthood. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 5-18.
Kitchener, K. S. (1983). Cognition, metacognition, and epistemic cognition: A three-level model of cognitive processing. Human Development, 26, 222-232.
Kuhn, D., Cheney, R., & Weinstock, M. (2000). The development of epistemological understanding. Cognitive Development, 15, 309-328.
Nussbaum, E. M., & Bendixen, L. D. (2003). Approaching and avoiding arguments: The role of epistemological beliefs, need for cognition, and extraverted personality traits. Contemporary educational Psychology, 28, 573-595.
Paulsen, M. B., & Wells, C. (1998). Domain differences in the epistemological beliefs of college students. Research in Higher Education, 39(4), 365-384.
Perry, W. G. Jr. (1970). Forms intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. Holt, New York: Rienhart & Winston.
Piaget, J. (1970). Genetic epistemology. New York: Columbia University.
Piaget, J. (1973). Memory and intelligence, New York: BasicBooks.
Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehensive. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 498-504.
Schommer, M. (1993a). Comparisons of beliefs about the nature of knowledge and learning among postsecondary students. Research in Higher Education, 34(3), 355-369.
Schommer, M. (1993b). Epistemological development and academic performance among secondary students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 406-411.
Schommer, M. (1994). Synthesizing epistemological belief research: Tentative understanding and provocative confusions. Educational Psychology Review, 6(4), 293-318.
Schommer, M., & Dunnell, P. A. (1997). Epistemological beliefs of gifted high school students. Roeper Review, 19(3), 153-156.
Schommer, M., Calvert, C., Gariglietti, G., & Bajaj, A. (1997). The development of epistemological beliefs among secondary students: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 37-40.
Schommer-Aikins, M. (2002). An evolving theoretical framework for an epistemological belief system. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 103-118). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schommer-Aikins, M. (2004). Explaining the epistemological belief system: Introducing the embedded systemic model and coordinated research approach. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 19-29.
Schommer-Aikins, M., Duell, O. K., & Barker S. (2003). Epistemological beliefs across domains using Biglan’s classification of academic disciplines. Research in Higher Education, 44(3), 347-366.
Schommer-Aikins, M., Duell, O. K., & Hutter, R. (2005). Epistemological beliefs, mathematical problem-solving beliefs, and academic performance of middle school students. The Elementary School Journal, 105(3), 289-304.
Schommer-Aikins, M., & Easter, M. (2006). Ways of knowing and epistemological beliefs: Combinedeffect on academic performance. Educational Psychology, 26, 411–423.
Schommer-Aikins, M., Mau, W., Brookhart, S., & Hutter, R. (2000). Understanding middle students’ beliefs about knowledge and learning using a multidimensional paradigm. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 120-127.
Schommer-Aikins, M., & Hutter, R. (2002). Epistemological beliefs and thinking about everydaycontroversial issues. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 136, 5–20.
Schraw, C. (2001). Current themes and future directions in epistemological research: A commentary. Educational Psychology Review, 13(4), 451-464.
Schraw, C., Bendixen, L. D., Dunkle, M. E. (2002). Development and validation of the epistemic belief inventory (EBI). In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 261-275). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schraw, G., & Sinatra, G. M. (2004). Epistemological development and its impact on cognition in academic domains. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(2), 95-102.
Tsai, C. C. (1998). An analysis of Taiwanese eighth graders’ science achievement, scientific epistemological beliefs and cognitive structure outcomes after learning basic atomic theory. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 413-425.
Tsai, C. C. (2000). Relationships between student scientific epistemological beliefs and perceptions of constructivist learning environments.Educational Research, 42, 193-205.
Tsai, C. C. (2005). Preferences toward internet-based learning environments: High school students’ perspectives for science learning.Educational Technology & Society, 8, 203-213.
Wood, P., & Kardash, C. (2002). Critical elements in the design and analysis of studies of epistemology.In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs aboutknowledge and knowing (pp. 231–260). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Yang, F. Y. (2005). Student views concerning evidence and the expert in reasoning a socio-scientific issue and personal epistemology. Educational Studies, 31, 65
Angus Duff.(1997)A note on the reliability and validity of a 30-item version of
Entwistle & Tail’s Revised Approaches to Studying Inventory. British Journal of
Educational Psychology, 67, 529-539
Angus Duff.(2000)Learning Styles Measurement the Revised Approaches to Studying Inventory (RASI) . Bristol Business School Teaching and Research Review Issue 3, Summer 2000, ISSN 1468-4578
Ausubel, D.P. and Robinson,F.G.(1996)School Learning:An introduction to educational psychology, New York:Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Brown, W.F. & Holtzman, W.H.(1956)Use of the survey of study habits and attitudes for counseling students. Personnel and Guidance Journal, 35, 214-216.
Entwistle, N.J.,Hanley,M. & Hounsell,D.(1979)Identifying distinctive approaches to s tudying.Higher Education,8,365-380
Entwistle, N.J. & Tait,H.(1995) The revised approaches to studying inventory. Edinburgh:Centre for Research on Learning and Instruction, University of Edinburgh.
Kolb, D. A.(1985) Learning style inventory: Self-scoring inventory and interpretation booklet. Boston: Mcber and Company.
Riding, R. J & Rayner, Stephen.(1999) Cognitive styles and learning strategies : understanding style differences in learning and behaviour . London : D. Fulton Publishers.
Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Thinking style. New York: Cambridge University.
Dunn, R., & Dunn, K. (1978). Teaching students through their individual learningstyles: A practical approach. Reston, Virginia: Prentice Hall College Div.
Dunn, R., & Dunn, K. (1979). Learning styles/teaching styles: Should they ... can they ... be matched? Educational Leadership, 36, 238-244.
Dunn, R., & Dunn, K. (1994). Teaching young children through their individual learning styles-practical approaches for grades K-2. Mass: Simon & Schuster.
Dunn, R., & Dunn, K. (1999). The complete guide to the learning styles inservice system. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Wessel, J., Loomis, J., Rennie, S., Brook, P., Hoddixznott, J., & Aherne, M. (1999). Learning styles and perceived problem-solving ability of student in a baccalaureate physiotherapy programme. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, 15, 17-24.