本研究主要的目的是探討實施同儕協助學習策略於閱讀課中，教師所面臨的困境與因應策略，並且透過此教學策略的實施，瞭解國中資源班學生的閱讀理解成效，以及學習反應。
研究採取行動研究，受試者為國中資源班學生，共八位。進行為期十六週，共四十八節課的教學。研究者透過學習單、觀察記錄、省思札記、訪談記錄、自編閱讀理解測驗與學生學習反應調查表等方式蒐集資料，並進行分析與探討，研究結果如下。
一、實施同儕協助學習策略於閱讀課中，教師所面臨的困境為：1.組別難以獨立完成練習。2.答題反應較僵化。3.容易忘記活動規則。4.核對答案判斷能力不足。5.各組反應時間差異大。6.部分組員易因精神與情緒影響表現。7.組員不易固定。8.教室空間太小，會互相干擾。依據以上的困境，其因應策略為：1.教師需隨時協助與檢視各組進行情形。2.活動設計需有結構與提示。3.教師需於活動時提醒規則，並於課後給予錯誤的組別校正。4.教師需先批改學習單，於課程中協助。5.適時調整各組活動流程。6.隨時關心組員，並給予協助。7.教師宜依據出席者適當分配組員。8.選擇較大空間的教室。
二、透過同儕協助學習策略教學後，國中資源班學生的閱讀理解整體上有進步。不論在「瞭解文章的基本事實」和「抽取文章的重點大意」，以及「推論」和「分析與比較」的能力，皆有提升。
三、同儕協助學習策略教學後，國中資源班學生對同儕學習策略於閱讀課的看法，以及對閱讀的態度，整體是正向的反應。

This study was to investigate the implementation of Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies (PALS) in reading class where teachers faced difficulties and then used coping strategies. Teachers implemented through the PALS to understand the reading comprehension effectiveness and learning responses of junior high school students in the resource classrooms.
This study adopted action research. The subjects were eight students in the resource classrooms. We conducted forty-eight classes, sixteen weeks of instruction. I collected the data by studying worksheets, observation records, reflections notes, interview records, self-edited reading comprehension tests and questionnaires of students’ learning responses for analysis and research. The results are as follows:
During the implementation of the PALS in reading class, difficulties faced by teachers were: First, the groups had difficulty in completing an independent practice. Second, answer reactions were more rigid when there were repeated activities. Third, easy to forget activity rules. Fourth, students were lack of the judgment to check the answers. Fifth, each group had large differences in reaction time. Sixth, some members were easily affected by mental and emotional performance. Seventh, members were not easily fixed. Eighth, classroom space was too small, so students would interfere with each other.
According to the above difficulties, I adopted following coping strategies: First, teachers needed to help at any time and manipulate the situation of each group. Second, activity design needed for structure and tips. Third, teachers needed to remind the rules during activities and give correction to erred group after class. Fourth, teachers needed to correct worksheets in advance and assist students correspondingly during the course. Fifth, adjust the flow of activities in each group. Sixth, always assist and concern about the crew. Seventh, teachers should distribute appropriately according to their attendance. Eighth, choose a larger classroom .
Through the PALS, junior high school students in the resource classrooms made progress in reading comprehension. There were increases in the abilities to "understand the basic facts of the article" and to"extract the effect focus of the article". Moreover, students did better in the abilities to "infer" and to "analyse and compare".
After the implementation of PALS, junior high school students in the resource classrooms had positive learning responses to the views of PALS in reading class and to the attitude of reading.

一、中文文獻
毛連塭、陳麗華（1991）：精熟學習法。臺北：心理。
王亦榮、杞昭安、李乙明、李永昌、胡永崇、洪榮照、徐享良、陳政見、
陳訓祥、黃世鈺、張昇鵬、錡寶香、謝建全（1999）：特殊兒童鑑定
與評量。臺北：師大書苑。
王振德（1999）：資源教室方案。臺北：心理。
王瓊珠（2004）：故事結構教學與分享閱讀。臺北：心理。
吳明清（1991）：教育研究。臺北：五南。
吳明隆（2001）：教育行動研究導論：理論與實務。臺北：五南。
吳訓生（2001）：國小低閱讀理解能力學生閱讀理解策略教學效果之研
究。 特殊教育學報，15，177-215。
吳慧珠、李長燦（2003）：Vygotsky社會認知發展理論與教學應用。載於
張新仁主編，學習與教學新趨勢，105-159。臺北：心理。
呂敏慧（2007）：運用同儕協助學習策略於國小三年級學童閱讀理解能力
之研究—以兒童班級讀書會為例。臺北市立教育大學課程與教學研
究所碩士論文（未出版）。
李嘉倩（2011）：運用同儕協助學習策略對國小五年級弱勢學童閱讀理解
之研究。國立臺中教育大學區域與社會發展學系碩士論文（未出版）。
岳修平（譯）（1998）：教學心理學—學習的認知基礎（原作者：E. D.
Gagné、C. W. Yekovich與F. R. Yekovich）。臺北：遠流。（原著出版年：1993）
林欣蔓（2007）：運用同儕協助學習策略於新台灣之子閱讀能力之個案研
究。國立臺北教育大學課程與教學研究所（未出版）。
林昶菁（2004）：閱讀障礙學生的閱讀理解策略。載於林寶貴主編，溝通
障礙：理論與實務，92-114。臺北：心理。
林清山（譯）（1998）：教育心理學—認知取向（原作者：R. E. Mayer）。　臺北：遠流。（原著出版年：1987）
林寶貴（1992）：智能不足者之語言矯治。載於許天威主編，智能不足者
之教育與復健，203-251。高雄：復文。
林寶貴、錡寶香（1999）：中文閱讀理解測驗指導手冊。教育部特殊教育
工作小組。
林寶貴、張小芬（1998）：國中智障學生國語文能力及其相關因素之研究。
特殊教育研究學刊，16，87-108。
柯華葳（2001）：語文科的閱讀教學。載於李咏吟主編，學習輔導：學
習心理學的應用，307-350。臺北：心理。
柯華葳（2007）：教出閱讀力。臺北：天下雜誌。
柯華葳、方金雅（2010）：閱讀理解評量。載於柯華葳主編，中文閱讀障
礙，167-176。臺北：心理。
洪月女（譯）（1998）：談閱讀（原作者：K. S. Goodman）。臺北：心理。（原著出版年：1996）
特殊教育課程教材教法及評量方式實施辦法。取自
http//law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspw?PCode=Hoo8oo31
崔夢萍（2006）：運用同儕協助學習策略於國小融合教育國語文學習之研
究。特殊教育研究學刊，30，27-52 。
張春興（2001）：教育心理學—三化取向的理論與實踐。臺北：東華。
許雲景（2012）：教師應用同儕協助學習策略經營班級讀書會對國中生閱
讀理解能力之影響。國立新竹教育大學人資處課程與教學碩士論文（未出版）。
郭生玉（2000）：心理與教育測驗。臺北：精華。
郭為藩（1971）：角色理論在教育學上之意義（上）。師友月刊，49，6-12。
陳伯璋（1998）：教育研究方法的新取向-質的研究方法。臺北：南宏。
陳李綢（1995）：學習策略訓練方案對國中生閱讀理解學習之影響。教育
心理學報，28，77-98。
陳惠琴、楊憲明（2008）：國小學童文本朗讀速度之分析研究。特殊教育
與復健學報，18，1-30。
陳嘉彌（2005）：國小跨年級同儕師徒制教學策略之研究。臺北：揚智。
陸正威（2000）：運用班級同儕的學習輔導法—「同儕交互指導教學」的
應用。教育資料與研究，33，67-69。
鈕文英（2008）：擁抱個別差異的新典範 : 融合教育。臺北 : 心理。
黃光雄（2002）：課程與教學。臺北：師大書苑。
黃志雄（2006）：從學習遷移理論談障礙學生的類化能力與學習策略。特
殊教育叢書9502—特殊教育現在與未來，91-102。臺中：國立臺中
教育大學特殊教育中心。
黃政傑（1987）：課程評鑑。臺北：師大書苑。
黃政傑、林佩璇（1996）：合作學習。臺北：五南。
黃琳惠（2009）：同儕教學對提升低閱讀能力兒童閱讀理解之研究。國立
臺北教育大學特殊教育學系特教教學碩士論文（未出版）。
黃瑞珍（1999）：故事結構分析法在語言學習障礙兒童教學之應用。國小
特殊教育，27，4-10。
黃蕾琇（2011）：運用同儕協助學習策略於國小四年級社會領域教學之研
究。國立臺中教育大學課程與教學研究所碩士在職專班碩士論文（未
出版）。
黃瓊如（2009）：電子繪本融入故事結構教學方案對國小輕度智能障礙學
生在理解故事內容的學習成效。國立臺北教學大學特殊教育研究所
碩士論文（未出版）。
溫明麗、黃乃熒、林建福、黃純敏、黃桂君、陳怡如、梁瑞芸（譯）（2002）：行動研究教育學（原作者：R. D. Parsons、S. L. Hinson 與D. Sardo-Brown）。臺北：洪葉文化。（原著出版年：2001）
蔡清田（2000）：教育行動研究。臺北：五南。
錡寶香（1999）：國小學童閱讀理解能力之分析。國教學報，11，100-131。
蘇宜芬（2004）：閱讀理解的影響因素及其在教學上的意義。教師天地，
129，21-28。
二、英文文獻
Bowman-Perrott, L. (2009). Classwide peer tutoring: An effective strategy for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Intervention inSchool Clinic, 44(5), 259-267.
Delquadri, J., Greenwood, C. R., Whorton, D., Carta, J. J., ＆ Hall, R. V. (1986). Classwide peer tutoring. Exceptional Children, 52, 535-542.
Elbaum, B. E., Vaughn, J. S., Hughes, M. T., ＆ Moody, S. W. (2000). How effective are one-to-one tutoring programs in reading for elementary students at risk for reading failure? A meta-analysis of the intervention research. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(4), 605-619.
Falk, K. B.,＆Wehby, J. H. (2001). The effects of peer-assisted learning strategies on the beginning reading skills of young children with emotional or behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 26 (4), 344-59.
Fantuzzo, J. W. (1992). Effects of reciprocal peer tutoring on mathematics and school adjustment: A component analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 331-339.
Fieding, L. G., ＆ Pearson, P. D. (1994). Reading comprehension: What works. Educational Leadership, 51(5), 62-68.
Fuchs, D., ＆ Fuchs, L. S. (2005). Peer-assisted learningstrategies:Promoting word recognition, fluency, and reading comprehension in young children. The Journal of Special Education, 39 (1), 34-44.
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., ＆ Burish, P. (2000). Peer-assisted learning strategies: An evidence-based practice to promote reading achievement. Learning Disabilities Research ＆ Practice, 15(2), 85-91.
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., ＆ Kazdan, S. (1999). Effects of peer-assisted learning strategies on high school students with serious reading problems. Remedial and Special Education, 20(5), 309-318.
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Mathes, P. G., ＆ Simmons, D. C. (1997). Peer-assisted learning strategies: Making classrooms more responsive to diversity. American Educational Research Journal, 34( 1), 174-206.
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Thompson, A., Svenson, E., Yen, L., Al Otaiba, S., Ｙang, N., Mcmaster, K. N., Prentice, K., Kazdan, S., ＆ Saenz, L. (2001). Peer-assisted learning strategies in reading: Extensions for kindergarten, first grade, and high school. Remedial and Special Education, 22(1), 15-21.
Goodlad, S.,＆ Hirst, B. (1989). Peer tutoring : A guide to learning by teaching. New York: Nichols.
Greenwood, C. R., Carta, J. J., Kamps, D. M. (1990). Teacher versus peer-mediated instruction: A review of educational advantages and disadvantages. In Foot, H. C., Morgan, M. J., ＆ Shute, R.H. (Ed.).Children helping children (pp. 177-205). England: John Wiley ＆ Sons.
Greenwood, C.R., ＆ Delquadri J. (1995). Classwide peer tutoring and the prevention of school failure. Preventing School Failure, 39(4), 21-25.
Harper, G. F., Mallette, B., ＆ Moore, J. (1991). Peer-mediated instruction: Teaching spelling to primary school children with mild disabilities. Reading, Writing, and Learning Disabilities, 7(1), 137-151.
Lerner, J. W. (2000). Learning disabilities: Theories, diagnosis, and teaching strategies(8th ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Co.
Lerner, J. W. ＆ Johns, B. H. (2012). Learning disabilities and related mild disabilities: Characteristics, teaching strategies and new directons
(11thed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Publishing Company.
Maheady, L. (2001). Peer mediated instruction and intervention and students with mild disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 4-15.
Marshak, L., Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (2011). Curriculum enhancements in inclusive secondary social studies classrooms. Exceptionality, 19(2) , 61-74.
Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T., Mohler, L., Beranck, M., Spencer, V., Boon R. T. ＆ Talbott, E. (2001). Can middle school student with serious reading difficulties help each other and learn anything? Learning Disabilities Research ＆ Practice, 16(1), 18-27.
Mathes, P. G., ＆ Babyak, A. E. (2001). The effects of peer-assisted literacy strategies for first-grade readers with and without additional mini-skills lessons. Learning Disabilities Research ＆ Practice, 16(1), 28-44.
Mathes,P. G., ＆ Fuchs, L. S. (1994). The efficacy of peer tutoring in reading for students with mild disabilities: A best-evidence synthesis. School Psychology Review, 23(1), 59-80.
Mathes, P. G., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Henley, A. M., & Sanders, A. (1994). Increasing strategic reading practice with peabody classwide peer tutoring. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 9, 44-48.
McMaster, K. L., Fuchs, D., ＆ Fuchs, L. S. (2007). Promises and limitations of peer-assisted learning strategies in reading. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 5(2), 97-112.
McMaster, K. L., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., ＆ Compton, D. L. (2005). Responding to nonresponders: An experimental field trial of identification and intervention methods. Exceptional Children, 71(4), 445-463.
McMaster, K.L., Kung, S. K., Han, I., ＆ Cao, M. (2008). Peer-assisted learning strategies: A”tier1”approach to promoting English learners’ response to intervention. Council for Exceptional Children, 74(2), 194-214.
Michael, S., ＆ Bruce, C. (1991). Discourses on the seasons (Tech. Rep.). Champaign: University of Illinois, Reading Research and Education Center.
Palincsar, A. M., ＆ Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 2, 117-175.
Palincsar, A. M., ＆ Brown, A. L. (1989). Classroom dialogues to promote self-regulated comprehension. In J. Brophy (Ed.). Advances in research on teaching (pp. 35-71). New York: JAI.
Rafdal, B. H., Mcmaster, K. L., Mcconnell, S. R., Fuchs, D., ＆ Fuchs, L. S. (2011). The effectiveness of kindergarten peer-assisted learning strategies for students with disabilities. Council for Exceptional Children, 77(3), 299-316.
Ramsey, M. L., Jolivette, K.,＆ Patton, B. (2007). Peer-assisted learning strategies (PALS) for reading in the EBD classroom. Beyond Behavior,17(1), 2-6.
Sáenz, L. M., Fuchs, L. S., ＆ Fuchs, D. (2005). Peer-assisted learning strategies for English language learners with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 71(3), 231-247.
Spörer, N., ＆ Brunstein, J. C. (2009). Fostering the reading comprehension of secondary school students through peer-assisted learning: Effects on strategy knowledge, strategy use, and task performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34, 289-297.
Stein, M.L., Berends, M., Fuchs, D., McMaster, K., Sáenz, L., Yen, L., ＆ Compton, D. L. (2008). Scaling up an early reading program: Relationships among teacher support, fidelity of implementation, and student performance across different sites and years. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30(4), 368-388.
Timothy, V. R. (1999). Exploring a method for estimating independent , instructional, and frustration reading rates. Journal of Reading Psychology, 20, 61-69.
Topping, K. (2000). Tutoring educational practices series. Retrieved from ERIC database.( ED 447111)
Topping, K. (2001). Peer assisted learning. USA: Brookline Books.
U. S. Department of Education (May 2012). W W C Intervention Report: Peer-assisted learning / literacy strategies.
Utley, C. A., Mortweet, S. L., ＆ Greenwood, C. R. (1997 ). Peer-mediated instruction and interventions. Focus on Exceptional Children, 29(5), 1-23.