本研究旨在探討將 AI 模組融入生活科技課程中，與傳統電路程式教學在學生運算思維能力與設計思考能力帶來的影響差異。本實驗以工業 4.0 智慧工廠為主題，教學內容分為人工智慧工廠（實驗組）與程式電控工廠（對照組）之教學，以臺北市某國中八年級學生為教學對象。本研究採用準實驗設計進行，研究中自變項為 AI 模組融入教學，依變項為學生運算思維能力與設計思考能力影響，在實驗前後皆透過運算思維能力量表與設計思考評估量表評量學習表現差異。
研究結果如下：1. 融入 AI 模組於生活科技教學中，對學生運算思維能力「演算法思考」構面有正向顯著影響。2. 融入 AI 模組於生活科技教學中，對學生設計思考能力「反思與思考」、「設計流程」、「團隊合作」、「傳達構想」等構面有正向顯著影響。依照研究結果顯示，針對往後人工智慧教育、運算思維教學、設計思考教學及後續研究，研提建議。

This study was conducted to explore the effects of Artificial Intelligence Module Instruction on students’ computational thinking ability and design thinking ability in living technology course. This experiment took the Industry 4.0 Smart Factory as the theme. The teaching content included artificial intelligence factory for experimental group and program-electric control factory for control group. A nonequivalent pretest-posttest design was adopted, and 182 eighth grade students from Taipei City, Taiwan, were recruited as research participants in this study. The independent variable in the research is the AI module integrated instruction, and the dependent variable is the students' computational thinking ability and design thinking ability. They were asked to complete computational thinking ability assessments and design thinking assessments for statistical analysis before and after the experiment for measuring the difference in learning performance.
The results of the research are as follows: 1. The integration of AI module in the teaching of living technology has a positive and significant impact on students' computational thinking ability "algorithmic thinking". 2. The integration of AI module in the teaching of living technology has a positive and significant impact on students' design thinking ability "Reflection/Mindfulness", "Process Skills", "Work Together On Teams", "Communicate your Project and Process to Others". According to the results, this study addressed recommendations and suggestions for implementation of artificial intelligence education, computational thinking teaching, design thinking teaching and researches in the future.

大同高中創意與設計教室（2019）。高中生活科技課綱解析。大同高中創意與設計教室。https://sites.google.com/site/dtshlifetechnology/%E9%AB%98%E4%B8%AD%E7%94%9F%E6%B4%BB%E7%A7%91%E6%8A%80%E8%AA%B2%E7%B6%B1%E8%A7%A3%E6%9E%90
中國醫學大學（2019）。中國附醫邁向 AI Smart Hospital！六項落地AI 精準快速診斷預測。中國醫學大學附設醫院。https://cmuh.cmu.edu.tw/NewsInfo/NewsArticle?no=4277
行政院新聞傳播處（2018）。台灣 AI 行動計畫—掌握契機，全面啟動產業 AI 化。行政院。https://www.ey.gov.tw/Page/5A8A0CB5B41DA11E/a8ec407c-6154-4c14-8f1e-d494ec2dbf23
研之有物（2018）。斷開中文的鎖鍊！自然語言處理（NLP）。中央研究院。http://research.sinica.edu.tw/nlp-natural-language-processing-chinese-knowledge-information/
科技領域、新課綱、資訊科技（2018）。資訊科技的學習內容。科技領域、新課綱、資訊科技。https://ite108.blogspot.com/2018/08/blog-post_10.html
國家教育研究院（2018）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校科技領域綱要。行政院：教育部。
許庭嘉（2019）。資訊科技與運算思維。康軒教師網。 https://www.945enet.com.tw/Main/Ha/teach_d.asp?pno=192&dt=A4
國家實驗研究院（2017）。未來 AI 發展八大新趨勢。科技政策研究與資訊中心。https://iknow.stpi.narl.org.tw/Post/Read.aspx?PostID=13837
國際半導體產業協會（2019）。智慧醫療新趨勢，這些你不可不知！Semi Taiwan。https://blog.semi.org/zh/%E6%99%BA%E6%85%A7%E9%86%AB%E7%99%82
臺大醫院（2019）。廣達電腦捐贈臺大醫院人工智慧醫療雲運算整合平台。臺灣大學醫學院附設醫院。https://www.ntuh.gov.tw/information/Lists/latest_news/DispForm___.aspx?ID=786
BBC (2014). Introduction to computational thinking. BBC. https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/guides/zp92mp3/revision/1
Bernardy, V., & Antoni, C. H. (2021). With grit to innovative teams?. Gruppe. Interaktion. Organisation. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Organisationspsychologie (GIO), 52(1), 65-78.
Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard business review, 86(6), 84.
Charline Zeitoun (2018). À l’usine, au bureau, tous remplacés par des robots?. CNRS Le Journal. https://lejournal.cnrs.fr/articles/a-lusine-au-bureau-tous-remplaces-par-des-robots
Dam, R. F., & Teo, Y. S. (2019). 5 stages in the design thinking process. Interaction Design, https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/5-stages-in-the-design-thinking-process
Del Olmo-Muñoz, J., Cózar-Gutiérrez, R., & González-Calero, J. A. (2020). Computational thinking through unplugged activities in early years of Primary Education. Computers & Education, 150, 103832.
Doleck, T., Bazelais, P., Lemay, D. J., Saxena, A., & Basnet, R. B. (2017). Algorithmic thinking, cooperativity, creativity, critical thinking, and problem solving: exploring the relationship between computational thinking skills and academic performance. Journal of Computers in Education, 4(4), 355-369.
García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2018).Editorial computational thinking. IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje, 13(1), 17-19.
Garneli, V., Giannakos, M. N., & Chorianopoulos, K. (2015, March). Computing education in K-12 schools: A review of the literature. In 2015 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (pp. 543-551). IEEE.
Glen, R., Suciu, C., Baughn, C. C., & Anson, R. (2015). Teaching design thinking in business schools. The International Journal of Management Education, 13(2), 182-192.
González, M. R. (2015). Computational thinking test: Design guidelines and content validation. In Proceedings of EDULEARN15 Conference (pp. 2436-2444).
Govil, A., & Pillalamarri, S. (2020). A corroborative approach for engineering education using design thinking. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 33, 429-433.
Graham, M. A. (2020). Deconstructing the Bright Future of STEAM and Design Thinking. Art Education, 73(3), 6-12.
Henderson, P. B., Cortina, T. J., & Wing, J. M. (2007). Computational thinking. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 39(1), 195-196.
Hira, A., & Hynes, M. M. (2016, June). Impromptu reflection as a means for self-assessment of design thinking skills. In 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.
Kafai, Y. B. (2016). From computational thinking to computational participation in K--12 education. Communications of the ACM, 59(8), 26-27.
Karen Hao (2019). It’s a bird, it’s a plane, it’s AI…NOT. Unissu. https://www.unissu.com/proptech-resources/its-a-bird-its-a-plane-its-ai
Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., Wong, B., & Hong, H. Y. (2015). Design thinking and education. In Design Thinking for Education (pp. 1-15). Springer, Singapore.
Korkmaz, Ö., & Xuemei, B. A. İ. (2019). Adapting computational thinking scale (CTS) for Chinese high school students and their thinking scale skills level. Participatory Educational Research, 6(1), 10-26.
Kules, B. (2016). Computational thinking is critical thinking: Connecting to university discourse, goals, and learning outcomes. In Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 53(1), 1-6.
Liedtka, J. (2015). Perspective: Linking design thinking with innovation outcomes through cognitive bias reduction. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(6), 925-938.
Lin, L., Shadiev, R., Hwang, W. Y., & Shen, S. (2020). From knowledge and skills to digital works: An application of design thinking in the information technology course. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36, 100646.
Nakata, C., & Hwang, J. (2020). Design thinking for innovation: Composition, consequence, and contingency. Journal of Business Research, 118, 117-128.
Owen, C. (2007). Design thinking: Notes on its nature and use. Design Research Quarterly, 2(1), 16-27.
Ólafur Andri Ragnarsson. (2018). Hvað er fjórða iðnbyltingin?. Visindavefur. http://visindavefur.is/svar.php?id=75164
Ratum, A. P., Sachari, A., & Wahjudi, D. (2020). A Review on Circular Design Guideliness by Ideo and Ellen Macarthur Foundation. e-Prosiding Pascasarjana ISBI Bandung, 1(1).
Rauth, I., Köppen, E., Jobst, B., & Meinel, C. (2010). Design thinking: An educational model towards creative confidence. In DS 66-2: Proceedings of the 1st international Conference on Design Creativity (ICDC 2010).
Razzouk, R., & Shute, V. (2012). What is design thinking and why is it important?. Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 330-348.
Romero, M., Lepage, A., & Lille, B. (2017). Computational thinking development through creative programming in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 1-15.
Royalty, A. (2010). Design Thinking Rubric. The K12 Lab Wiki. https://dschool.stanford.edu/groups/k12/wiki/1056c/attachments/4f886/Rubric.xls
Sawyer, R. K. (2019). The role of failure in learning how to create in art and design. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 33, 100527.
Seidel, V. P., Marion, T. J., & Fixson, S. K. (2020). Innovating how to learn design thinking, making, and innovation: Incorporating multiple modes in teaching the innovation process. INFORMS Transactions on Education, 20(2), 73-84.
Sjøkvist, N. M., & Kjørstad, M. (2019, July). Eliciting Human Values by Applying Design Thinking Techniques in Systems Engineering. In INCOSE International Symposium (Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 478-499).
Snalune, P. (2015). The benefits of computational thinking. ITNOW, 57(4), 58-59.
So, H. J., Jong, M. S. Y., & Liu, C. C. (2020). Computational thinking education in the Asian Pacific region. Asia-Pacific Edu Res 29, 1–8 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-019-00494-w
Stevens, E. (2019). What Is Design Thinking? A Comprehensive Beginner's Guide. CareerFoundry, https://careerfoundry.com/en/blog/ux-design/what-is-design-thinking-everything-you-need-to-know-to-get-started/
Warr, M., & Mishra, P. (2021, March). Why Design Thinking Sucks (in Education). In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1035-1040). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Whang, L., Tawatao, C., Danneker, J., Belanger, J., Weber, S. E., Garcia, L., & Klaus, A. (2017). Understanding the transfer student experience using design thinking. Reference Services Review.
Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33-35.
Yadav, A., Zhou, N., Mayfield, C., Hambrusch, S., & Korb, J. T. (2011, March). Introducing computational thinking in education courses. In Proceedings of the 42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 465-470).
Yadav, A., Stephenson, C., & Hong, H. (2017). Computational thinking for teacher education. Communications of the ACM, 60(4), 55–62.