STEM（科學、科技、工程、數學）教育的推展是當前的教育趨勢，如何藉由STEM實作課程強化並整合學生的知識亦是當前重要的課題。本研究以Ajzen（1985）所發展的計畫行為理論為基礎，目的在探討職前教師於STEM實作課程中的知識整合行為及其影響因素。本研究採用問卷調查法，以臺灣一所知名的師資培育大學為主要研究對象，針對其自然與生活科技領域的職前教師進行調查研究，總計回收有效問卷共計83 份。所得資料利用單因子變異數分析、皮爾森積差相關、線性結構方程、路徑分析進行處理。研究結論如下：(1) STEM實作課程以學生擅長的個別領域來引導，更容易引發學生知識整合的行為。(2) 教師與同學的期望與支持，有助於學生在STEM實作課程的知識整合。(3) STEM實作課程可有效幫助學生學習發展STEM相關領域的知識整合。(4) 他人的支持與自身的信心是STEM實作課程中知識整合的關鍵。(5) 男女生皆適合進行STEM實作課程的知識整合行為。(6) 不同年級皆應發展STEM實作課程。(7) STEM相關科系教師較適合從事STEM實作課程的教學。建議未來教師在從事STEM實作課程教學時，應多給予學生支持，並培養學生自我信心，將可提高學生在學習過程的知識整合行為。

The promotion of STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics) education is the current trend in education. How to strengthen and integrate the knowledge of students by STEM performance courses is also an important issue currently. The study is based on the theory of planned behavior by Ajzen (1985), and is to discuss the knowledge integrated behaviors of pre-service teachers in STEM Performance Courses along with its effective factor. The study takes the questionnaire inquisition, and the objects of the study are those pre-service teachers now studying science and life technology area in a well-known college for training teachers. Altogether, there are 83 effective questionnaires collected. The documents collected are processed with one-way analysis, pearson’s correlation, linear structural equation, pathway analysis method. The results show that: (1) STEM performance courses are led by individual areas which students are good at. It will be easier to evoke students’ knowledge integrated behaviors. (2)With expectations and support from teachers and students, it helps students integrate knowledge in STEM performance courses. (3) STEM performance courses effectively help students learn how to develop knowledge integration of related fields. (4)The key of knowledge integration in STEM performance courses is the support from others and self confidence. (5) Knowledge integration in STEM performance courses is suitable for male and female. (6) STEM performance courses should be carried out in different stage of learning. (7) It is more appropriate for teachers of areas related with STEM performance courses to undertake the teaching of STEM performance courses. It is suggested that teachers should give students more support, and cultivate their self-confidence when undertaking the teaching of STEM performance courses. In this way,it is going to promote students' knowledge integration behavior during their learning process.

一、中文部分
王國川（1998）。計畫行為理論各成份量表之設計、發展與建立－以青少年無照騎車行為之研究為例。師大學報，43(2)，67-91。
王國川、鍾鳳嬌、陳淵源、孟祥仁（2012）。國中數理教師使用教學網站之影響因素研究－計劃行為理論之驗證與其應用。人文社會科學研究，6（1 ），1-32。
王瑞宏（2008，11月）。技職校院學生透過通識教育提升職場核心能力之研究－以輔英科技大學為例。載於輔仁大學管理學研究所舉辦之「第六屆新世紀優質企業理念與價值創造」研討會論文集（頁674-688），新北市。
王瑞壎（2002）。OECD組織PISA評量對國小數學與科學教育之啟示。科學、教育研究與發展季刊，27，39-56。
王瑞壎（2012）。「後金融危機時代」美國教育發展戰略規劃及啟示。全球教育展望，41（7），69-73。
王澄霞（1995）。STS活動中的「學」與「教」。科學教育學刊，3（1），115-135。
任孔冰（2010）。論大學生知識整合能力的培養。中國電力教育，175 （24），15-16。
全球華人計算機教育應用大會（2012）。數位教育遊戲於「科學、科技、工程及數學教育」（STEM Education)之運用。2014年3月20日，取自http://www.gccce2012.org/Workshop/CFP9.doc
江文鉅（2009）。科技與工程教育的結合。生活科技教育月刊，42（6），1-2。
江春崎（2004）。人類知識整合理論－純粹理論建構與推論檢證。復興崗學報，82，241-258。
行政院國家科學委員會（2011）。中華民國科學技術白皮書（民國100 年至103 年）。台北：作者。
何宗穎（2013）。以中介學習經驗的理論詮釋國中科學探究活動中教師的中介角色與學生探究能力的成長。國立高雄師範大學科學教育暨環境教育研究所博士論文，未出版，高雄市。
吳元良（1996）。不同數學課程、性別、社經地位的國小學生在數學態度及成就比較之研究。國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，屏東縣。
吳育東（2000）。LISREL模式應用於行動電話消費者滿意度之研究。國立成功大學統計學研究所碩士論文，未出版，台南市。
吳萬益（2005）。企業研究方法。台北：華泰文化。
李宜玫、蔡育嫺（2011）。知覺父母回饋與國小高年級學童數學科考試失敗歸因之研究。科學教育學刊，19（2），123-141。
林人龍、游光昭（2005）。水平整合的思考：以MST 為導向的九年一貫生活科技課程設計。生活科技教育月刊，38（8），24-41。
林民棟（2006）。應用心智繪圖在國小自然與生活科技領域之教學。生活科技教育月刊，37（3），77-88。
林坤誼（2001）。高中開設準工程取向科技教育課程之研究。國立台灣師範大學科技應用與人力資源發展研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
林秋慧（2008）。以計劃行為理論探討大專教職員休閒運動行為。南亞學報，28，367-383。
林麗華、林清文（2003）。國中生數學科學習之目標導向、社會比較、自我效能與課業壓力關係研究。彰化師大輔導學報，25，87-132。
邱皓政（2003）。結構方程模式：LISREL的理論、技術與應用。台北：雙葉書廊。
邱皓政（2011）。當PLS遇上SEM：議題與對話，量化研究學刊，3，20-53。
侯心雅、盧鴻毅（2009）。從「計劃行為理論」及「第三人效果」探討影響消費者行為的因素：以「毒奶粉」報導為例。2009中華傳播學會年會，新竹縣。
侯世光、劉冠賢（2009）。增強科技創新研發能力的專題製作類教學活動。生活科技教育月刊，42（4），87-92。
胡宜平（2006）。論析英語教學法知識的多元整合。山西廣播電視大學學報，54(5)，58-60。
張春興（1994）。教育心理學。台北：東華書局。
張國祥、薛寶嫦、麥瑞琪、楊文佳（2013）。澳門 PISA 2012 研究計劃報告：從國際比較的觀點評核15歲學生的數學、科學和閱讀素養表現。澳門：澳門大學教育測驗與評核研究中心。
張琇鈺（2006）。談國中生活科技教師教學信念對學生學習態度之影響。師說，194，30-31。
教育部（2003）。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。台北：教育部。
教育部（2011）。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要自然與生活科技學習領域。台北：作者。
教育部統計處（2012）。大專校院畢業生人數－按學科類別分。2012年9月20日，取自http://www.edu.tw/files/site_content/B0013/106-29.xls
莊舜元（2009）。專案式STEM學習活動之發展研究。國立高雄師範大學工業科技教育學系碩士論文，未出版，高雄市。
郭生玉（1975）。父母期望水準不切實際時對子女成就動機之影響。教育心理學報，8，61-79。
陳正和（2001）。影響青年學習行為的組織承諾、信念與一些社會特徵。應用心理研究，11，117-140。
陳志豪（2004）。高二學生對科學的態度與科學相關行為意向之研究。東海大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台中市。
陳信璁（2009）。宜蘭縣「自然科學資賦優異教育方案」對學生的自我效能與問題解決態度之研究。佛光大學未來與樂活產業研究所碩士論文，未出版，宜蘭縣。
陳姿吟（2007）。科技創作學童自我效能與主動學習關係之研究。國立臺灣師範大學工業教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
陳柏豪（2008）。STEM整合式教學法在國中自然與生活科技領域物理教學之研究。國立屏東科技大學技術及職業教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，屏東縣。
陳智華（2010年12月8日）。PISA評量／閱讀、數學、科學 上海三冠 台灣退步。聯合報，A7版。
陳麗純（2008）。以ARCS 動機模式分析大學生圖書館利用教育之學習動機。輔仁大學資訊研究所碩士論文，未出版，新北市。
游光昭、林坤誼、王詩婷（2007）。自然與生活科技領域統整課程的反思與實踐。當代教育研究，15（1），143-180。
游光昭、韓豐年、徐毅穎、林坤誼（2005）。國中學生科技態度量表之發展。高雄師大學報，19，69-83。
黃子榕（2006）。研發團隊知識分享行為研究。真理大學管理科學研究所碩士論文，未出版，新北市。
楊宏仁、羅希哲、于瑞珍、曾國鴻（2009）。學生以知識管理實踐STEM（Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics）學習之中美跨國研究。2014年6月20日，取自http://ir.lib.nknu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/13749
臺灣 PISA 國家研究中心（2012）。PISA評量內涵。2012年9月20日，取自http://pisa.nutn.edu.tw/pisa_tw_03.htm
趙中建（2012年6月15日）。為了創新而教育－科學、科技、工程和數學教育（STEM education）：一個值得認識和重視的教育戰略。中國教育報，第07版。
劉一慧（2012）。STEM專案學習對自我效能與工程專業承諾之影響。國立高雄師範大學工業科技教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，高雄市。
劉瑞圓（2001）。課程統整與科技教育。科學教育月刊，238，12-23。
劉燕儒（2014）。學習時間、自我效能與學生科學成就三者關係之探究－以PISA 2006資料庫為例。2014年6月20日，取自 http://www.ced.ncnu.edu.tw/proposal/劉燕儒.pdf
蔡桂芳、金自強、林曉雯（2011）。國民小學數理資優教師專業表現標準之研究。特殊教育與輔助科技學報，3，117-158。
蔡筱梅（2005）。知識整合機制對團隊學習績效的影響。國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，桃園縣。
蔡蕙文（2008）。STEM教學模式應用於國中自然與生活科技領域教學之研究。國立屏東科技大學技術及職業教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，屏東縣。
鄭聰騰（2003）。臺北市國中自然與生活科技教師資訊行為研究。國立臺灣師範大學社會教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
蕭建華、張俊彥（2012）。介入自我效能對不同性別學生「自我學習評估」與「學習成效」之影響－以高一地球科學為例。科學教育月刊，352，28-34。
賴美嬌，蔡武德（2005）。國際教育品質模式在進修學院運用之實證研究。高應科大社會人文科學學報，2，197-208。
魏麗敏（1989）。國民中小學生一般焦慮、數學焦慮、數學態度之比較研究。台中師院學報，5（1），129-153。
羅希哲、蔡慧音、石儒居、詹為淵（2010）。網路專題式學習應用於高中女學生STEM知識學習之研究。人文社會科學研究，4（4），115-141。
羅希哲 、蔡慧音、曾國鴻（2011）。高中女生STEM 網路專題式合作學習之研究。高雄師大學報，30，41-61。
羅希哲、陳柏豪、石儒居、蔡華齡、蔡慧音（2009）。STEM整合式教學法在國民中學自然與生活科技領域之研究。人文社會科學研究，3（3），42-66。

二、外文部分
Ajzen, I. (1985). From intention to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl and J. Bechmann (Eds.), Action-control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11-39). Heidelberg: Springer.
Ajzen, I. (1989). Attitude structure and behavior. In A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler and A.G. Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude structure and function (pp. 241-274). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Process, 50, 179-211.
Ajzen, I. (2002). Constructing a tpb questionnaire: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Retrieved June 20, 2014, from http://www.socgeo.ruhosting.nl/html/files/spatbeh/tpb.measurement.pdf
Ajzen, I. (2005). Attitudes, personality, and behavior. Milton-Keynes, England: McGraw- Hill.
Ajzen, I. (2006). Behavioral interventions based on the theory of planned behavior. Retrieved September 20, 2012, from http://people.umass.edu/aizen/pdf/tpb.intervention.pdf
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Atkinson, J. W. (1964). An introduction to motivation. Princeton: Van Nostrand. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y., (1988). On the evaluation of structure equations models. Academic of Marketing Science, 16(1), 76-94.
Balka, D. (2011). Standards of mathematical practice and STEM. Stillwater, OK: School Science and Mathematics Association.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice- Hall, Inc.
Barak, M. (2014). Closing the gap between attitudes and perceptions about ICT-enhanced learning among pre-service STEM teachers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(1), 1-14.
Bayer Corporation (2012). STEM education, science literacy and the innovation workforce in America. Washington, D.C.: Author.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-258). New York: Greenwood.
Breckler, S.J. (1984). Empirical validation of affect, behavior, and cognition as distinct components of attitude. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1191 -1205.
Bryman, A., & Cramer, D., (1997). Quantitative data analysis with SPSS for windows. London: Routledge.
Bybee, R. W. (2010). What is STEM education. Science, 329, 996.
Carin, A. A. (1993). Teaching modern science (6th ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
Casad, B. J., & Jawaharlal, M. (2012, June). Learning through guided discovery: An engaging approach to K-12 STEM education. American Society for Engineering Education Conference Proceedings. K-12 and Pre-College Engineering Division, Washington, DC.
Chen, C. H. (2010). Promoting college students' knowledge acquisition and ill-structured problem solving: Web-based integration and procedure prompts. Computers & Education, 55(1), 292-303.
Cheon, J., Lee, S., Crooks, S. M., & Song, J. (2012). An investigation of mobile learning readiness in higher education based on the theory of planned behavior. Computers & Education, 59(3), 1054-1064.
Chin, W. W. (2010). Bootstrap cross-validation indices for PLS path model assessment. In V. Esposito Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, and H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of partial least squares (pp. 83-98). Heidelberg: Springer.
Chiu, J. L., & Linn, M. C. (2011). Knowledge integration and wise engineering. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 1(1), 1-14.
Compeau, D.R., & Higgins, C.A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189-211.
Cronbach, L.J. (1947). Test reliability: Its meaning and determination, Psychometrika, 16, 1-16.
Cuieford, J. P. (1965). Fundamental statistics in psychology and education. New York: McGraw Hill.
Dane, F. C. (1990). Research method. Pacific Grove, C. A.: Brooks/ Cole.
Davis, E. A. (2003). Knowledge integration in science teaching: Analysing teachers knowledge development. Research in Science Education, 34, 21-53.
Davis, E. A., & Linn, M. C. (2000). Scaffolding students knowledge integration: Prompts for reflection in KIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), 819-837.
Dyrenfurth, M. J. (1991). Technological literacy synthesized. In J. Dyrenfurth, & M. R. Kozak (Eds.), 40th yearbook of council on technology teacher education (pp. 211-219). IL: Macmillan/ McGraw-Hill.
Economics and Statistics Administration (2011). STEM: Good jobs now and for the future. Washington, D.C.: Author.
Efron, B. (1979). Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jackknife. Annals of Statistics, 7, 1-26.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison- Wesley.
Fornell C., & Larcker D., (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50.
Fortus, D., Krajcikb, J., Dershimerb, R.C., Marx, R.W., & Mamlok- Naamand, R. (2005). Design based science and real world problem solving. International Journal of Science Education, 27(7), 855-879.
Friday Institute for Educational Innovation (2012). Middle / high School student attitudes toward STEM survey. Raleigh, NC: Author.
Furner, J. M., & Kumar, D. D. (2007). The mathematics and science integration argument: A stand for teacher education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(3), 185-189.
Gardner, P. L. (1975). Attitudes to science: A review. Studies to science education, 2, 1-41.
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for windows step by step. New York: Pearson.
Godemann, J. (2008). Knowledge integration: A key challenge for transdisciplinary cooperation. Environmental Education Research, 14(6), 625-641.
Granovetter, M. S. (1992). Problems of explanation in economic sociology. In Nohria N, Eccles RG (eds.), Networks and Organizations (pp. 25-56). Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA.
Gwernan-Jones, R., & Burden, R. L. (2010). Are they just lazy? Student teachers' attitudes about dyslexia. Dyslexia, 16(1), 66-86.
Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., & Black, W.C., (1992). Multivariate data analysis with readings (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan Publishing.
Hulland, J., Ryan, M. J., & Rayner, R. K. (2010). Modeling customer satisfaction: A comparative performance evaluation of covariance structure analysis versus partial least squares. In V. Esposito Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, and H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of partial least squares (pp. 307-326). Heidelberg: Springer.
ITEEA Board of Directors. (2009). Proclamation: ITEA's position on the “T & E” of STEM. Retrieved September 20, 2012, from http://www.iteaconnect.org/mbrsonly/Library/WhitePapers/STEMProclamation.pdf
Joseph, Rolph, & Ronald. (1989). Multivariate data and analysis with reading. CA: MacMillan Publishing Company.
Kankanhalli, A., Tan, B. C. Y., & Wei, K. K. (2005). Contributing knowledge to electronic knowledge repositories: An empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 113-143.
Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (1999). The psychological origins of perceived usefulness and ease-of-use. Information and Management, 35, 237-250.
Kerlinger, F. N., & Lee, H. B. (1999). Foundations of behavioral research. Orlando, FL: Harcourt.
Kim, S.S., & Malhotra, N.K., (2003). A longitudinal model of continued IS use: An integrative view of four mechanisms underlying postadoption phenomena. Management Science, 51(5), 741-755.
Klopfer, L. (1971). Evaluation of learning in science. In B. Bloom, J. Hastings, & G. Madaus (Eds.), Handbook of summative and formative evaluation of student learning (pp. 559-641). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Kuenzi, J. J. (2008). Science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education: Background, federal policy and legislative action. Washington, D. C.: Congressional Research Service.
Laboy-Rush, D. (2011). Integrated STEM education through project-based learning. Retrieved September 20, 2012, from http://www.learning.com/pdfs/STEM-White-Paper-101207.pdf
Lantz, H. B. (2009). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education: What form? What function? Retrieved June 20, 2014, from http://www.currtechintegrations.com/pdf/STEMEducationArticle.pdf
Lee, J., Cerreto, F. A., & Lee, J. (2010). Theory of planned behavior and teachers' decisions regarding use of educational technology. Educational Technology & Society, 13(1), 152-164.
Leonard-Barton, D. (1995). Wellsprings of knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Liem, G. A. D., & Bernardo, A. B. I. (2010). Epistemological beliefs and theory of planned behavior: Examining beliefs about knowledge and knowing as distal predictors of indonesian tertiary students' intention to study. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 19(1), 127-142.
Liu, O. L., Lee, H. S., & Linn, M. C. (2011). Measuring knowledge integration: Validation of four-year assessments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(9), 1079-1107.
Lou, S. J., Liu, Y. H., Shih, R. C., & Tseng, K. H. (2011). The senior high school students' learning behavioral model of STEM in PBL. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 21(2), 161-183.
Lou, S. J., Liu, Y. H., Shih, R. C., Chuang, S. Y., & Tseng, K. H. (2011). Effectiveness of on-line STEM project-based learning for female senior high school students. International Journal of Engineering Education, 27(2), 399-410.
Lou, S. J., Shih, R. C., Diez, C. R., & Tseng, K. H. (2011). The impact of problem-based learning strategies on STEM knowledge integration and attitudes: an exploratory study among female Taiwanese senior high school students. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 21(2), 195-215.
Mahoney, M. P. (2010). Students’ attitudes toward STEM: Development of an instrument for high school STEM-Bases Programs. Journal of Technology Studies, 36(1), 24-34.
Mississippi Department of Education (2011). STEM applications. Jackson, MS: Author.
Molinari, G., & Tapiero, I. (2007). Integration of new domain-related states and events from texts and illustrations by subjects with high and low prior knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 17(3), 304-321.
Morrison, J. (2006). TIES STEM educaion monograph series, attributes of STEM education. Baltimore, MD: Teaching Institute for Excellence in S.T.E.M..
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266.
National Academy of Education. (2009). Standards, assessments and accountability: Education policy white paper. Washington, D.C.: Author.
National Academy of Sciences (2005). Committee on prospering in the global economy of the 21st century: An agenda for American science and technology. Washington, D. C.: Author.
National Governors Association (2011). Building a Science, technology, engineering and math agenda. Washington, D. C.: Author.
National Research Council (2011). Successful K-12 STEM education: Identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. National Academy Press, Washington, D. C.: Author.
National Science Board. (2007). National action plan for addressing the critical needs of the U.S. science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education system. Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation.
National Science Board. (2009). STEM education recommendations for the president-elect obama administration. Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation.
National Science Board. (2010). Preparing the next generation of STEM innovators: Identifying and developing our nation’s human capital. Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation.
Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Oswald, T. A., & Turnage M. (2000). First five minutes. Research Strategies, 17, 347-351.
Raju, P.K., & Clayson, A. (2010). The future of STEM education: An analysis of two national reports. Journal of STEM Education, 11(5 & 6), 25-28.
Reyes, L. H. (1984). Affective variables and mathematics education. Elementary School Journal, 84, 558-581.
Rukavina, I., & Daneman, M. (1996). Integration and its effect on acquiring knowledge about competing scientific theories from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(2), 272-287.
Sadaf, A., Newby, T. J., & Ertmer, P. A. (2012). Exploring pre-service teachers' beliefs about using Web 2.0 technologies in K-12 classroom. Computers & Education, 59(3), 937-945.
Sally, & Jaumall A. (2010). STEM comes to preschool. Young Children, 65(5), 12-14.
Sanders, M. (2008). STEM, STEM education, STEMmania. The Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20-26.
Satchwell, R. E., & Loepp, F. L. (2002). Designing and implementing an integrated mathematics, science, and technology curriculum for the middle school. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 39(3), 41-66.
Schneider, M. (2011). Commentary 2: Knowledge integration in mathematics learning: The case of inversion. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79(3), 447-453.
Schunk, D. H. (1989). Self-efficacy and achievement behaviors. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 173-208.
Schwab, D.P., (1980). Construct validity in organizational behavior. Research in Organizational Behavior, 2, 3-43.
Scott, D., & Willits, F. K. (1994).Environmental attitudes and behavior. A Pennsylvaniasurvey, Environment and Behavior, 26(2), 239-260.
Shepherd, R., Sparks, P., & Guthrie, C.A. (1995). The application of the theory of planned behaviour to consumer food choice. In E-European Advances (eds.), Consumer research (pp. 360-365). Flemming Hansen, Provo, UT : Association for Consumer Research.
Simpson, R. D., Koballa, T. R., Oliver, J. S., & Crawley, F. E. (1994). Research on the affective dimensions of science learning. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 211-234). New York: Macmillan.
Soldner, M., Rowan-Kenyon, H., Inkelas, K. K., Garvey, J., & Robbins, C. (2012). Supporting students’ intentions to persist in STEM disciplines: The role of Living-Learning Programs among other social-cognitive factors. Journal of Higher Education, 83(3), 311-336.
Songer, N. B., & Linn, M. C. (1991). How do students’ views of science influence knowledge integration? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 761-784.
Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. (1988). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 240-261.
STEM Education Coalition (2011). Statement of STEM education coalition core policy principles 2011. Washington, D.C.: Author.
Stohlmann M., Moore, T. J., & Roehrig, G. H. (2012). Considerations for teaching integrated STEM education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 2(1) , 28-34.
Stols, G., & Kriek, J. (2011). Why don't all maths teachers use dynamic geometry software in their classrooms? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(1), 137-151.
Tachibana, H., & Fujimura, N. (2010). Knowledge integration through collaborative problem solving in high school students : Others as partners in co-constructing knowledge. Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 58(1), 1-11.
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Accessing IT usage: The role of prior experience. MIS Quarterly, 19(4), 561-570.
Teo, T., Koh, N. K., & Lee, C. B. (2011). Teachers intention to teach financial literacy in Singapore: A path analysis of an extended theory of planned behaviour. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 20(2), 410-419.
Terzis, V., & Economides, A. A. (2011). The acceptance and use of computer based assessment. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1032-1044.
Tsupros, N., Kohler R., & Hallinen, J. (2009). STEM education: A project to identify the missing components. Intermediate Unit 1 and Carnegie Mellon, Pennsylvania.
United States Domestic Policy Council (2006). American competitiveness initiative. Washington, D. C.: Author.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sciences, 27, 451-481.
Von Glasersfeld, E. (1990). An exposition of constructivism: Why some like it radical. Journal for Research in Mathematics, 4, 19-29.
Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 35-57.
Weiner, B. (1985). An attribution theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548-573.
Wicklein, R., & Schell, J. (1995). Case studies of multidisciplinary approaches to integrating mathematics, science, and technology education. Journal of Technology Education, 6(2), 59-76.
Yager, R. E. (1992). The STS approach parallels constructivist practices. Science Education International, 3(2), 18-20.
Yager, R. E. (1996). Science/technology/society as reform in science education. New York: State University of New York Press.
Yu, T. K., & Yu, T. Y. (2011). Modelling the factors that affect individuals utilisation of online learning systems: An empirical study combining the task technology fit model with the theory of planned behavior. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(6), 1003-1017.
Zhang, J., Pantula, S. G., & Boos, D. D. (1991). Robust methods for testing the pattern of a single covariance matrix. Biometrika, 78, 787-795.
Zimmerman, B. J., Bandura, A., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Self-motivation for academic attainment: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal setting. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 663-676.
Zollman, A. (2012). Learning for STEM literacy: STEM literacy for learning. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 12-19.