簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 黃睦甯
Huang, Mu-Ning
論文名稱: 基斯・古祖瓦德畫作中的雙身:創作方法與構圖之研究
The Double in the Paintings of Kees Goudzwaard: Studies on Creative Process and Form
指導教授: 辛蒂庫絲
Candida Syndikus
口試委員: 辛蒂庫絲
Candida Syndikus
諾斯邦
Valentin Nussbaum
吳介祥
Wu, Chieh-Hsiang
口試日期: 2024/07/29
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 藝術史研究所
Graduate Institute of Art History
論文出版年: 2024
畢業學年度: 112
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 137
中文關鍵詞: 基斯.古祖瓦德(1958年生)分身當代繪畫華特·班雅明當代荷蘭畫家創作方法
英文關鍵詞: Kees Goudzwaard (b. 1958), the double, contemporary painting, Walter Benjamin, Dutch contemporary painters, work process
研究方法: contemporary art study現代藝術研究critical theory批判理論formal analysis視覺(形式)分析
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202401637
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:128下載:9
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

第一眼,荷蘭畫家基斯.古祖瓦德(1958年生)的畫作讓觀眾勿以爲是剪紙拼貼畫。事實上,這些作品描繪了與之等同大小的紙質模型。古祖瓦德的創作方法始於以色紙、這色透明度的醋酸鹽薄膜、紙膠帶構築一幅紙質模型。這些輕薄的材料被剪、貼、相互堆叠形成抽象的拼貼畫。排列好拼貼畫後,古祖瓦德將以顏料將拼貼的構圖呈現在畫布上。他隱藏筆觸,使畫面顯得光滑、輕薄,同時,讓顏料模仿紙模型的質感,以假亂真。古祖瓦德的畫作既以寫實筆法展現平凡的物質,亦是抽象的形狀排列。

此論文以分身(the doppelgänger, the double),一個與本體相同、威脅要取代自我的存在,來解釋古祖瓦德的模型與畫作之關係。這兩者相似卻又不同,以平等的姿態持有華特·班雅明所定義之原作的靈光。此論文進一步探查古祖瓦德的構圖中所展現的不同種類的分身,如存在與不存在、正與負。此分析旨在為分身這一該概念在視覺藝術的研究做出貢獻。近年,分身這一概念在視覺藝術的研究已引起了許多學界興趣。

論文的最後部分將聚焦於基斯.古祖瓦德藝術中所展現的機械性和檔案圖像。文獻資料的意象、書籍出版的指涉同時表達了以上兩個主題。膠帶、醋酸纖維片賦予了古祖瓦德藝術獨特的透明和不透明效果。文中這兩種關鍵材料的歷史、材料特性的考察,凸顯古祖瓦德的創作與 20 世紀初前衛傳統的聯繫。

基斯.古祖瓦德的畫作反思了繪畫的本質,進而激發觀者覺察他或她正在進行觀賞這一行為。這一反思性的經驗讓觀眾專注於面對作品的當下與現場。

At first sight, paintings by the Dutch painter Kees Goudzwaard (b. 1958) deceive the viewer as they resemble paper collages. In truth, the paintings are equal-size representations of the paper models constructed by the artist. Gouzwaard’s creative process begins with the manual task of composing a paper model with color paper, acetate sheets of various degrees of transparency, and masking tape. These thin materials are cut, attached, and layered upon each other to form collages of abstract compositions. After setting up a collage, Goudzwaard realizes the compositions on the canvases with paint. He conceals the brushstrokes to make the surface of a painting appear smooth and thin while allowing the paints to imitate the texture of the paper model with eye-deceiving likenesses. Goudzwaard’s paintings are both naturalistic representations of humble materials and abstract arrangements of forms.
The present thesis applies the concept of the doppelgänger (the double), an identical existence that threatens to replace the self, to define the relationship between Goudzwaard’s models and paintings. The two are alike yet distinct, equally claiming the aura of the original as defined by Walter Benjamin (1892–40). This study further explores the different types of double expressed in Goudzwaard’s works, such as the effect of presence and absence as well as the positive and negative. The thesis aims to contribute to the analysis of the double in visual art, a topic that has attracted much scholarly interest in recent years.
The final chapter of the thesis focuses on the themes of mechanical motifs and archival imagery of Kees Goudzwaard’s art. The depictions of documents and references to book publishing simultaneously express the two themes. An examination of the history and material properties of tape and acetate sheets, two key materials that give Goudzwaard’s art the characteristic play of transparency and opaqueness, underlines the connection of Goudzwaard’s art with the avant-garde tradition of the early 20th-century.
Kees Goudzwaard’s painting reflects on what painting is, prompting the viewer to become aware of their engagement in the act of observation. The reflective experience grounds the audience in the present time and space in which he or she they confront the works.

English Abstract i Chinese Abstract ii Table of Contents iii Introduction 1 State of Research 7 Chapter 1 The Creative Process 18 1.1. Differences between the Model and the Painting 18 1.2. Influence and Application of Walter Benjamin’s Theory 25 1.3. Double in Kees Goudzwaard’s Artistic Process 30 Chapter 2 Visual Expressions of the Double 37 2.1. A Double Reading on Window 37 2.2. Transparency and the Photographic Negative 39 2.3 Cutout, Void, and the Remaining Paper 43 2.4. Multiple Doubles 50 Chapter 3 Mechanical Motifs and Archiving Desires 56 3.1. Paul Klee’s Oil-Transfer: in Comparison with Kees Goudzwaard’s Art Process 56 3.2. Archival Desires 61 3.3. Mechanical Methods 64 Conclusion 70 Bibliography 72 Appendix I: Illustrations 79 Appendix II: Interview with Kees Goudzwaard (May 2022) 123 Appendix III: Interview with Kees Goudzwaard (November 2023) 130 List of Photographic Credits 135

Abbing, Michiel Roscam, “Samuel van Hoogstraten’s Personal Letter-Rack Paintings: Tributes with a Message,” in: The Universal Art of Samuel van Hoogstraten (1627–1678), pp. 114–137.
Babo, Sara and Joana Lia Ferreira, “A Survey of Acrylic Sheet in Portuguese Art Collections,” in: Conservar Patrimõnio 39, 2022, pp. 61–70.
Baker, George, The Artwork Caught by the Tail: Francis Picabia and Dada in Paris, Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2010.
Barthes, Roland, “Plastic,” in: Plastic Age: Modernity to Post-Modernity, London: Victoria & Albert Publishing, 1996, p. 110–111.
Benedetti, Lorenzo, “The Narrow Gap Between Abstraction and Reality,” in: Kees Goudzwaard. Between Red and a Transparent Plane, exhibition catalog, Middelburg: De Vleeshal, and Amsterdam: Roma Publications, Roma Publications, 2014, s. p.
Benjamin, Walter, “The Work of Art in the Age of Its Technological Reproducibility: Second Version,” in: The Work of Art in the Age of Its Technological Reproducibility and Other Writings on Media, pp. 17–57, ed., Michael W. Jennings and others., trans., Edmund Jepheatt and others, Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2008.
Benjamin, Walter, “Über den Begriff der Geschichte, These IX,” https://www.textlog.de/benjamin/abhandlungen/ueber-den-begriff-der-geschichte#ix.
Bonacossa, Ilaria, “Process as Time,” in: Kees Goudzwaard. Provisional Space, exhibition catalog, Amsterdam: Roma Publications, 2011, pp. 37–41.
Bowlt, John E., “The Presence of Absence: The Aesthetic of Transparency in Russian Modernism,” in: The Structurist 27, 1987, pp. 15–22.
Britannica, T. Editors of Encyclopedia, "cellulose acetate," in: Encyclopædia Britannica, July 22, 2009; https://www.britannica.com/science/cellulose-acetate.
Brontë, Charlotte, Jane Eyre: an Autobiography, New York: Harper & brothers, 1899.
Buddemeier, Heinz, Panorama, Diorama, Photographie, Munich: Wilhelm Fink, 1970, p. 207.
Cooper, Harry, “Braque’s Ovals,” in: Picasso and Braque: the Cubist Experiment 1910-1912, Santa Barbara: Santa Barbara Museum of Art and Fort Worth: Kimbell Art Museum, 2011.
Comment, Bernard, The Painted Panorama, London: Reaktion Books, 1999.
Danišová, Nikola, “The Archetypal Motif of a Doppelgänger in the Cultural and Mythical Traditions around the World,” in: Forum for World Literature Studies 15, no. 1, March 2023.
Diederich, Nicole A., “Gothic Doppelgangers and Discourse: Examining the Doubling Practice of (Re)marriage in Jane Eyre,” in: Nineteenth-Century Gender Studies 6.3, Winter 2010; https://www.ncgsjournal.com/issue63/PDFs/diederich.pdf.
Douglas Crimp, “Positive/Negative: A Note on Degas’s Photographs,” in: October 5, Photography, 1978, pp. 89–100.
Duncan, Thomas, “Presence through Absence: Photography and Picasso’s Papiers Collés,” Master’s Thesis, University of California, Los Angeles, 2020.
Droste, Magdalena, The Bauhaus: 1919-1933: Reform and Avant-garde, Los Angeles, Taschen, 2015.
Edwards, Mary D. (ed.), Doppelgängers, Alter Egos and Mirror Images in Western Art, 1840–2000, Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland & Company, Inc., 2020.
Freud, Sigmund, The Uncanny, trans., David McLintock and Hugh Haughton, London: Penguin Classics, 2003.
Garland, Alex, Annihilation, 2018, Los Angeles: Paramount Pictures.
Glaesemer, Jürgen, Paul Klee: Handzeichnungen, vol. 1& 2, Bern: Kunstmuseum, 1973, p. 260.
Gottschaller, Pia, “From Ruler to Tape: Stops and Starts in the History of Painted Abstraction,” in: The Getty Research Journal 10, 2018, pp. 149–66.
Gray, Camilla, The Russian Experiment in Art 1863-1922, New York: Thames & Hudson, 2000 (orig. ed. London: Thames & Hudson, 1962).
Greenberg, Clement, “Collage,” in: Modern Art and Modernism: A Critical Anthology, ed. by Francis Frascina and Charles Harrison, New York: Harper & Row, 1983, s. p.
Greenberg, Clement, “Modernist Painting,” in: Modern Art and Modernism: A Critical Anthology, ed., Franscis Frascian and Charles Harrison, New York: Harper & Row, pp. 5–10,
Hackenschmidt, Sebastian, “Beyond Disillusion. Kees Goudzwaard and the Dialectical Tension of Painting,” 2005, S.M.A.K., catalog, reprinted in: Kees Goudzwaard. Sequent, exhibition catalog, Amsterdam: Roma Publications, (86) 2006, pp. 53–61, here p. 54.
Haxthausen, Charles W., “The Graphic Legacy of Paul Klee: An Exhibition of Klee’s Prints,” (Exhibition Review) in: Art Journal 44, no. 1, Spring 1984, pp. 78–80.
Hedges, Ines, “Faust and Early Film Spectatorship,” in: Framing Faust: Twentieth-Century Cultural Struggles, Carbondale, Illinois: Southern Illinois University Press, 2009, pp. 27–29.
Huang, Mu-Ning, “Ways to Look at Goudzwaard’s Paintings,” in: Nunu Fine Art News, Vol. 51, 2022;
https://www.nunufineart.com/exin-progress-solo-exhibition-of-kees-goudzwaard.
Hyde, Ralph ed., Panoramania! The Art and Entertainment of the “All-Embracing” View, London: Trefoil Publications, 1988; Stephan Oettermann, The Panorama. History of a Mass Medium, New York: Zone Books, 1997.
Iliescu, Daniela Adriana, et al., “Management of Diplopia,” in: Romanian Journal of Ophthalmology, July–September 61, no. 3, 2017, pp. 166–170; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5710033/.
Imhoof, David, et al. The Total Work of Art: Foundations, Articulations, Inspirations, New York: Berghahn Books, 2016; https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvr6955g.
Josef & Anni Albers Foundation, “no title,” at: https://www.albersfoundation.org/alberses/biography.
Kingdom, Frederick A.A., Samir Touma, and Ben J. Jennings, “Negative Afterimages Facilitate the Detection of Real Images,” in: Vision Research 170, May 2020, pp., 25–34; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2020.03.005.
Krauss, Rosalind, “Grids,” in: October 9, 1979, pp. 50–64.
Lerner, Fern, “Foundations for Design Education: Continuing the Bauhaus Vorkurs Vision,” in: Studies in Art Education 46, No. 3, Spring, 2005, pp. 211–226.
Meyer, James, “The Double: Identity and Difference in Art since 1900” in: The Double: Identity and Difference in Art since 1900, exhibition catalog, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2022, pp. 8–56.
National Historic Chemical Landmarks, “Scotch Transparent Tape,” in: ACS Chemistry for Life; https://www.acs.org/education/whatischesmistrylandmarks/scotchtape.html ( (accessed on July 23, 2024).
Owens, Craig, “Photography ‘en abyme’,” in: October, 5, Photography, 1978, pp. 73–88.
Overy, Paul, De Stijl (World of Art), London: Thames & Hudson,1991.
Peterson, Mary A. and Emily Skow Grant, “Memory and Learning in Figure-Ground Perception,” in: Cognitive Vision: Psychology of Learning and Motivation 42, 2003, pp. 1–34.
Poggi, Christine, “‘Table’ and ‘Tableau’ in Picasso’s Collages and Constructions,” in: Art Journal 47, No. 4, Revising Cubism, 1988, pp. 311–322.
Rank, Otto, The Double, a Psychoanalytic Study, ed. and trans., Harry Tucker Jr., Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 1971.
Rewald, Sabine, “An Interview with Felix Klee,” in: Ead., ed., Paul Klee, New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art, 1988, , pp. 19–49.
Rye, Stellan. Student of Prague (Der Student von Prag), 1913, Germany: Deutsche Bioscop.
Richter, Hans, Dada: Art and Anti-Art (World of Art), London: Thames & Hudson 1997.
Roelstraete, Dieter, “Pathways to the work of Kees Gouzwaard,” in: Kees Goudzwaard. Frontal Views, exhibition catalog, Roma Publication: Amsterdam, 2004, pp. 4–11.
Sardo, Delfim, “Map, composition and montage,” in: Kees Goudwaard. Sequent, exhibition catalog, Amsterdam: Roma Publications, (86) 2006, pp. 63–71,
Sylvester, David, “Mondrian-I” About Modern Art: Critical Essays, 1948-1996, New York: Henry Holt and Co., 1997, p. 135.
Trodd, Tamara, The Art of Mechanical Reproduction: Technology and Aesthetics from Duchamp to the Digital, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2015.
Wandschneider, Miguel, “Introduction,” in: Kees Goudwaard. Sequent, exhibition catalog, Amsterdam: Roma Publications, (86) 2006, pp. 49–52.
Warehime, Marja, Brassaï: Images of Culture and the Surrealist Observer (Modernist Studies), Baton Rouge and London: Louisiana State University Press, 1996.
Welliver, Neil, “Albers on Albers,” in: Art News 64, 1966, p. 50.
Whitford, Frank, Bauhuas, New York: World of Art, 1984.
Wittocx, Eva, “The Paintings of Kees Goudzwaard: the Viewer Viewed,” in: Kees Goudzwaard. Schilderijen, exhibition catalog, Ghent: SMAK, 2005, s. p.
Wölfflin, Heinrich, Kunstgeschichtliche Grundbegriffe. Das Problem der Stilentwicklung in der neueren Kunst, Munich: Bruckmann, 1915; Engl. edition under the title Principles of Art History. The Problem of the Development of Style in Later Art, transl. from the 7th German Edition (1929) into English by Mary D. Hottinger, New York: Dover Publications, 1932; many reprints.
Vandermeer, Jeff, Annihilation, New York: ‎ Farrar Straus & Giroux, 2014.
Van Imschoot, Tom and Ritsart Gobyn, “The Viewer Must Become a Bit Complicit. Visiting the Studio of Kees Goudzwaard,” in: Tom van Imschoot and Ritsart Gobyn, eds., Acts of Painting, Grafische Cel: Ghent, 2022, pp. 226–253.
Ullrich, Wolfgang, Die Geschichte der Unschärfe, Berlin: Wagenbach, 2009 (1st ed. 2002); 烏利西 (Wolfgang Ullrich) 著, 胡育祥譯, 《模糊的歷史》 (臺北: 一行出版, 2021).
“Paul Klee Centennial: Prints and Transfer Drawings,” in: Museum of Modern Art New York Press Release, no. 126, January 1978, p. 2.
“Documentary Archival Material Related to Rachel Whiteread's Ghost in National Gallery of Art Library Installation,” in: National Gallery of Art, Press Release, August 27, 2018.

下載圖示
QR CODE