國立臺灣師範大學博碩士論文全文系統

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表

研究生：	顧吟吟 Ku, Yin-Yin
論文名稱：	角色扮演活動與英語教學：活動類型與學生程度如何影響學習過程與成效 Different Types of Role-play as an English Instruction Vehicle for Junior High School Students of Various Proficiency Levels
指導教授：	常紹如 Chang, Shau-Ju
學位類別：	碩士 Master
系所名稱：	英語學系 Department of English
論文出版年：	2015
畢業學年度：	103
語文別：	英文
論文頁數：	128
中文關鍵詞：	角色扮演、活動類型、學生程度、學生認知、教學建議
英文關鍵詞：	role-play, types of role-play, language proficiency levels, students' perceptions, pedagogical implications
論文種類：	學術論文
相關次數：	點閱：130 下載：45
分享至:	分享至facebook 分享至twitter

查詢本校圖書館目錄查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統勘誤回報

提升學生溝通能力長久以來一直是英語教師共同努力的教學目標，有鑑於此，專家學者提出許多相關的創新教學理論與溝通式教學方法，而其中角色扮演被認為是最具代表性且成效性的教學活動；然而，很少有文獻關注學生對於角色扮演活動的想法與教師如何在課堂中有效進行角色扮演活動的過程。此外，相關文獻對於「角色扮演活動」的定義不盡相同，因此哪一種類型對學生最有助益、而不同語言程度的學生適用於何種類型，至今尚未有所定論。因此本研究旨在探討：(1)學生對於不同種類角色扮演活動的想法；(2)教師針對不同語言程度的學生進行不同種類的角色扮演活動時，應該注意的教學事項。本研究的實驗對象為桃園市某間國中一個隨機抽樣的八年級普通班級共30位學生，分為三種程度：初學者、中等生、進階生。本研究採用四大類型角色扮演教學活動，以教師為中心到以學生為中心的教學模式依序為：填空式、每句提示型、情境和句型引導式、自由發揮型。透過問卷調查、訪談、教師日誌蒐集研究資料，使用單因子變異數分析和Scheffe事後檢定研究方法分析問卷。研究結果顯示：(1)學生對於角色扮演活動的喜好和興趣，會影響他們對於該活動是否具有學習成效、是否應納入學校英語課程等認知。(2)學生對不同類型活動的不同教學階段(即準備、表演、回饋階段)皆提供類似的教學建議。(3)從三個面向給予教師教學上實質的建議：角色扮演活動各個教學階段的注意事項、進行不同類型角色扮演活動的注意事項、指導不同程度學生角色扮演活動的注意事項。本研究不僅可以了解學生對於不同類型角色扮演活動的想法，更可以提供教師在角色扮演教學活動應用上有效的建議。

Language teachers around the world have been pursuing the goal of promoting students’ communicative competence, and many innovative pedagogical theories and communicative approaches have thus emerged. Among them, role-play is considered the most typical one with considerable positive effects on language learning. However, few studies have paid attention to the process of how students perceive and prepare for and how teachers conduct role-play. Furthermore, as the previous researchers interpreted the term “role-play” differently, there is little consensus on which kind of role-play is the most beneficial to students of what proficiency level. To fill these gaps, the present study aimed at exploring how students perceive different types of role-play activities and what teachers should heed when conducting different role-plays to students of different language proficiency levels. One heterogeneous class of thirty eighth-graders in a junior high school in Taoyuan were grouped into basic, intermediate, and advanced levels. Four types of role-play, from the most structured to the most creative mode, were utilized, including skeleton dialogues, cued dialogues, role instructions, and free role-play. Data were collected through questionnaires, sub-sample interviews, and teaching journals. One-way ANOVA and post hoc tests with Scheffe’s method were utilized for quantitative data analysis. Results suggested that: 1) students’ preferences and interests in role-play influenced how helpful they thought of it and whether it should be incorporated into English class; 2) students showed similar suggestions on the conduction of different types at different stages; 3) pedagogical implications with common suggestions on the conduction of role-play were presented from the three viewpoints: different stages of role-play conduction, different types of role-play, and different proficiency levels of students. The study shed light on a better understanding of students’ perceptions of different types of role-play and suggestions for conducting role-play as an instructional means in an EFL classroom.

CHINESE ABSTRACT…………………………………………………………………………………………………………i
ENGLISH ABSTRACT………………………………………………………………………………………………………ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS………………………………………………………………………………………………………iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS……………………………………………………………………………………………………vi
LIST OF TABLES………………………………………………………………………………………………………viii
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………………………………1
CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW………………………………………………………………………5
2.1 Definitions of Role-play…………………………………………………………………………5
2.2 Types of Role-play…………………………………………………………………………………………7
2.3 Procedures in Using Role-play…………………………………………………………21
2.4 Potential Problems of Role-play and Recommended Solutions…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………25
2.5 Factors in Successful Use of Role-play…………………………………28
2.6 Studies on Role-play in a Language Classroom…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………32
2.7 Research Gap………………………………………………………………………………………………………38
2.8 Research Questions of the Present Study………………………………39
CHAPTER THREE METHODOLOGY………………………………………………………………………………40
3.1 Participants………………………………………………………………………………………………………40
3.2 Teaching Materials: Four Types of Role-play & Four Dialogues…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………42
3.3 Implementation…………………………………………………………………………………………………44
3.4 Instruments…………………………………………………………………………………………………………52
3.5 Data Analysis……………………………………………………………………………………………………56
CHAPTER FOUR RESULTS & DISCUSSION…………………………………………………………58
4.1 Students’ Learning Background Information…………………………58
4.2 Students’ Perceptions of Role-play……………………………………………60
4.3 Students’ Suggestions for the Teacher……………………………………85
4.4 The Researcher’s Observations on the Conduction of Role-play………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………94
4.5 Pedagogical Implications………………………………………………………………………96
CHAPTER FIVE CONCLUSION…………………………………………………………………………………104
5.1 Summary of Major Findings…………………………………………………………………104
5.2 Limitations and Suggestions for Future Research………106
REFERENCES……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………108
APPENDIX A: Questionnaire for perceptions of skeleton dialogues (Type 1)………………………………………………………………………………………………111
APPENDIX B: Questionnaire for perceptions of cued dialogues (Type 2)…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………114
APPENDIX C: Questionnaire for perceptions of role instructions (Type 3)………………………………………………………………………………………116
APPENDIX D: Questionnaire for perceptions of free role-play (Type 4)…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………118
APPENDIX E: Questionnaire of preferences for four role-play activities……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………120
APPENDIX F: Sub-sample interview…………………………………………………………121
APPENDIX G: Teaching journal form………………………………………………………122
APPENDIX H: Teacher evaluation form for role-play……………123
APPENDIX I: Student evaluation form for role-play……………124
APPENDIX J-M: Worksheets……………………………………………………………………125-128

                                

Aliakbari, M. & Jamalvandi, B. (2010). The Impact of ‘Role Play’ on Fostering EFL Learners’ Speaking Ability: A Task-Based Approach. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 15-29.
Brown, H. D. (2007). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. New York: Pearson Education.
Bryne, D. (1986). Teaching oral English: Longman Handbooks for English Teacher. London: Longman.
Canale, M. (1983). From communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy. In Richards, J. C. & Schmidt, R. W. (Eds.), Language and Communication, 2-27. London: Longman.
Canale, M. & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical Bases of Communicative Approaches to Second Language Teaching and Testing. Applied linguistics, 1(1), 1-47.
Clapper, T. C. (2010). Role Play and Simulation: Returning to Teaching for Understanding. Education Digest: Essential Readings Condensed for Quick Review, 75(8), 39-43.
Clark, R. C. (1980). Language teaching techniques. Brattleboro, VT: Pro Lingua Associates.
Crookall, D. & Oxford, R. L. (1990). Linking and language learning and simulation/game. In Crookall, D. & Oxford, R. L. (Eds.), Simulation, Gaming, and Language, 3-29. New York: Newbury House Publishers.
Cross, D. (1999). A practical handbook of language teaching. Essex, England: Longman Publisher.
Dickinson, L. (1981). ‘Have you Got Mr. Bun the Baker?’ Problems and Solutions in the Use of Games, Role Play, and Simulations. ELT Journal, 35(4), 381-384.
Doff, A. (1988). Teach English: A training course for teachers: trainer’s handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haruyama, J. (2010). Effective Practice of Role Play and Dramatization in Foreign Language Education. Komaba Journal of English Education, 1, 31-58.
Horwitz, E. K. (1985). Getting Them All into the Act: Using Audience Participation to Increase the Effectiveness of Role-Play Activities. Foreign Language Annals, 18(3), 205-208.
Kaur, N. (2002). Role Play: A panacea in language class. The English Teacher Online, 31, 60-70. Retrieved Aug 17, 2012, from http://www.melta.org.my/ET/2002/wp06.htm
Klippel, F. (1983). Keep talking: Communicative fluency activities for language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Kumaran, S. R. (2010). Benefits and shortcomings of role-play as s speaking activity in English language classrooms. English Teacher, 39, 72-93.
Ladousse, G. P. (1987). Role-play. Oxford University Press.
Lee, B. H. (1991). Role-play and simulation. The English Teacher Online, 20. October. Retrieved Aug 17, 2012, from http://www.melta.org.my/ET/1991/main5.html
Lightbown, P. M. & Spade, N. (2006). How languages are learned (2nd edition). Oxford University Press.
Littlewood, W. (1981). Communicative language teaching: An introduction. Cambridge University Press.
Liu, F. & Ding, Y. (2009). Role-play in English Language Teaching. Asian Social Science, 5(10), 140-143.
Liu, X. (2010). Arousing the College Students’ Motivation in Speaking English through Role-play. International Education Studies, 3(1), 136-144.
Livingstone, C. (1983). Role play in Language Learning. Longman, 1560 Broadway, New York, NY 10036.
Maxwell, C. (1997). Role Play and Foreign Language Learning. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Japan Association of Language Teachers (23rd, Hamamatsu Japan, October 9-12, 1997).
Nunan, D. (1988). Syllabus design. Oxford University Press.
Olsen, J. W. & Gosak, A. (1978). Initiating Communication in the ESL Classroom. ELT Journal, 32(4), 265-270.
Ramos, F. B. R. (2002). ESL Students’ Perceptions of Role-play Activities (Doctoral dissertation, West Virginia University).
Raz, H. (1985). Role-play in foreign language learning. System, 13(3), 225-229.
Richards, J.C. (1985). The context of language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Robinson, P. G. (1981). Role-playing and Class Participation. ELT Journal, 35(4), 384-386.
Salies, T. G. (1995). Teaching Language Realistically. Role Play Is the Thing. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 424753)
Savignon, S. J. (1997). Communicative competence: Theory and classroom practice (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Scarcella, R. C., & Oxford, R. L. (1992). The tapestry of language learning: The individual in the communicative classroom. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Shi, Z. (2006). Communicative approach in English teaching. Retrieved Feb 6, 2013, from http://www.xyuan.net/zola/ReadNews.asp?NewsID=207
Stern, S. L. (1980). Drama in second language learning from a psycholinguistic perspective. Language Learning, 30, 77-97.
Sturtridge, G. (1981). Role-play and simulations. In K. Johnson & K. Morrow (Eds.), Communication in the classroom. London: Longman.
Su, H.C. (2007). An action research on teaching English through role-plays for local junior high school students. Unpublished MA thesis. Taipei: National Taiwan Normal University.
Su, J.I. (2008). The effects of role-play on students’ English speaking ability and attitudes/motivation─A case of Bei-Shi Junior High School. Unpublished MA thesis. Taichung Chaoyang University of Technology.
Su, P. C. (1991). The Effectiveness of the role-play activities in learning English as a foreign language by Chinese college students. In Papers from the workshop on facing the challenges of the 90's: An EFL perspective, 45-99. Kaohsiung: National Kaohsiung Normal University.
Surplus, S. H. (1983). Overcoming Role-Play Resistance. Training, 20(12), 93-94.
Susanti, A. D. H. (2007). Using role play in teaching speaking. Retrieved Aug 17, 2012, from http://www.docstoc.com/docs/69427947/USING-ROLE-PLAY-IN-TEACHING-SPEAKING
Tompkins, P.K. (1998). Role playing/Simulation. Retrieved Feb 9, 2013, from www.iteslj.org/techniques/tompkins-roleplaying.html
Wilkins, D.A. (1976). Notional syllabuses. London: Oxford University Press.

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

相關論文