簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 李淑娟
Shu-Chuan Li
論文名稱: 父育理論之建構與驗證─父親心理社會發展、父育知覺、父職參與及相關因素之研究
The relationship among fathers' psychosocial development attributes, fathering perceptions and father involvement
指導教授: 黃迺毓
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 人類發展與家庭學系
Department of Human Development and Family Studies
論文出版年: 2004
畢業學年度: 92
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 183
中文關鍵詞: 父育理論父育知覺父職參與心理社會發展
英文關鍵詞: generative fathering theory,, fathering perception, father involvement, psychosocial development
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:387下載:133
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 摘 要
    本研究以Erikson的心理社會發展理論為基礎,再參考Dolahite等的傳承創新父育理論之架構,編製四套適用我國成人父親之心理社會發展量表、父育知覺量表、父職參與量表及配偶支持父職參與程度量表;並探討四量表間及四量表與時間變項間的相關性,最後再驗證本研究所建構之父育理論架構與心理社會發展特質、時間變項及配偶支持父職參與程度間的組型關係。
    四量表之編製過程乃是先以理論概念編題、選題,並經專家之內容效度審核以及二次預試之試題項目分析及信度考驗等分析程序,逐一修正後才確定正式量表內容。正式施測採問卷調查法,以國立空中大學學生名冊為母體清冊,分層隨機抽樣,獲取1381份有效問卷。研究結果經描述性統計分析、單因子變異數分析、皮爾森積差相關、典型相關等統計法加以分析,並歸納主要研究發現為如下數點:
    一、 本研究編製之心理社會發展量表、父育知覺量表及父職參與量表,雖均由數個不同層面之因素所組成,但最後均能獲得一個測量整體概念的有效分數。研究結果支持心理社會發展量表、父育知覺量表、父職參與量表及配偶支持父職參與程度量表具信效度之研究假設;亦即,本研究發展之四量表具適用性與實用性。
    二、 本研究根據傳承創新父育理論架構所建構的父育理論測量工具-父育知覺量表及父職參與量表,與心理社會發展量表及其第七層面之「傳承創新」發展特質間,皆具有顯著正相關。驗證了本研究之父育理論架構與心理社會發展理論間的正向連結關係。
    三、 本研究之父育理論架構是以親職應符合子女發展需求為要的理念建構而成;父育知覺量表可以有效評量父親對子女成長需求的重視程度,父職參與量表可以有效評量父親具體參與父職的程度;由父育知覺量表及父職參與量表所建構而成的父育理論架構可以作為篩選稱職父親及評估父(親)職教育方案實施成效之有效評量依據。
    四、 本研究以典型相關分析出父親之不同層面心理社會發展特質與父育知覺各層面特質及父職參與各層面特質間的組型關係,研究結果可提供家庭教育專業人員在輔導個案父親時先對父職參與行為背後可能的心理社會發展特質及父育知覺特質之組型關係有初步了解,進而再針對其特質加以輔導。
    關鍵詞:父育理論、父育知覺、父職參與、心理社會發展

    Abstract

    The purposes of this study were (1) to build a framework of generative fathering theory in Taiwan and to construct four tests regarding fathering perception, father involvement, Eriksonian psychosocial attributes and spouse’ fathering support . (2) to testify the validation of above four tests. (3) to explore the relationships among fathering perception, father involvement, Eriksonian psychosocial attributes, spouse’ fathering support and time variables.
    A total of 1,381 fathers, randomly selected through students of National Open University in Taiwan, responded to a set of instruments including the Fathering Perception Scale, the Father Involvement Scale, the Eriksonian Psychosocial Attributes Scale and the Spouse’ Fathering Support Scale. The statistical methods used to analyze the data were descriptive statistics, ANOVA, Pearson Product-moment Correlation and Canonical Correlation.
    The main findings of this study were summarized as follows:
    1. In summary, through serial procedure (Ex. item analysis, test-retest method, factor analysis, ANOVA etc.), the reliability and validity of the Fathering Perception Scale, the Father Involvement Scale, the Eriksonian Psychosocial Attributes Scale and the Spouse’ Fathering Support Scale were satisfactory.
    2. There were significant correlations between the Fathering Perception Scale, the Father Involvement Scale, the Eriksonian Psychosocial Attributes Scale, the Spouse’ Fathering Support Scale and time variables.
    3. All the findings revealed that the generative fathering framework constructed in this study could be related with generative attributes and psychosocial development theory.
    4.. There were significant canonical correlations among the Fathering Perception Scale, the Father Involvement Scale, the Eriksonian Psychosocial Attributes Scale, the Spouse’ Fathering Support Scale and time variables.
    According to the results, some suggestions were proposed for parents, family educator and future research.

    目 錄 中文摘要………………………………………………………… Ⅰ 英文摘要………………………………………………………… 目錄……………………………………………………………… Ⅴ-Ⅵ 表次……………………………………………………………… Ⅶ-Ⅷ 圖次……………………………………………………………… Ⅸ-Ⅹ 第一章 緒論 第一節 研究背景與動機…………………………………………… 1 第二節 研究目的…………………………………………………… 4 第三節 研究問題…………………………………………………… 4 第四節 名詞釋義…………………………………………………… 4-5 第二章 文獻探討 第一節 心理社會發展理論及其相關研究………………………… 6-13 第二節 心理社會發展量表及其修訂過程………………………… 14-17 第三節 父育理論及其相關研究…………………………………… 18-23 第三章 研究方法 第一節 研究架構…………………………………………………… 24-25 第二節 研究假設…………………………………………………… 26-27 第三節 研究對象…………………………………………………… 28-34 第四節 研究工具…………………………………………………… 35 第五節 研究程序…………………………………………………… 36 第六節 資料處理與統計分法……………………………………… 37-38 第四章 研究結果與討論 第一節 心理社會發展量表、父職參與量表、父育知覺量表及配偶支持父職參與程度量表之編製、信效度分析及常模…… 39-79 第二節 心理社會發展、父育知覺、父職參與、配偶支持父職參與及時間變項間之相關分析………………………………… 80-92 第三節 父育知覺、父職參與、心理社會發展、配偶支持父職參與程度及時間變項間之典型相關分析……………………… 93-117 第五章 結論與建議 第一節 結論………………………………………………………… 118-126 第二節 建議………………………………………………………… 127-130 參考文獻 中文部分……………………………………………………………… 131-133 英文部分……………………………………………………………… 133-138 附 錄 附錄一: MEPSI之同意使用書 139 附錄二: 心理社會發展與父職參與問卷(第一次預試問卷) 140-148 附錄三: MESPI原作者對第一次預試項目分析結果之回饋意見信函 149-151 附錄四: 內容效度之委員名單 152 附錄五: 心理社會發展與父職參與問卷(第二次預試問卷) 153-161 附錄六: 心理社會發展與父職參與問卷(正式問卷) 162-172 附錄七: 心理社會發展量表之百分等級常模對表 173-174 附錄八: 父育理論原作者之回饋意見信函 175-179 附錄九: 父職參與量表之百分等級常模對表 180 附錄十: 父育知覺量表之百分等級常模對表 181-182 附錄十一: :配偶支持父職參與程度量表之百分等級常模對表 183

    參 考 文 獻
    壹、中文部分
    方紫薇(1985)。青少年自我統整發展暨價值澄清團體諮商對高一女生自我統整之影響。國立臺灣師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    王志永(1996)。實用技能班學生個人背景、自我統整與技能學習態度之相關研究。國立彰化師範大學工業教育學系碩士論文,未出版。
    王舒芸(1996)。現代奶爸難為乎?雙工作家庭中父職角色之初探。國立台灣大學社會學研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    王舒芸、余漢儀(1997)。奶爸難為-雙薪家庭之父職角色初探。婦女與兩性學刊,8,115-149。
    王叢桂(2000)。促進參與父職因素的探討。應用心理研究,第6期,2000夏,131-171。
    朱進財(1986)。師專學生自我統整的相關因素及成長團體訓練效果之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版。
    江南發(1991)。青少年期自我統合發展之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版。
    何英奇(1984)。我國大學生次文化及其相關因素之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版。
    吳黛宜(2003)。已婚男性父職態度與實踐之研究-以台北市為例。國立台灣師範大學家政教育學系家政教育教學碩士班學位論文,未出版。
    李正傑(2001)。雙薪家庭高承諾男性的工作與家庭生活經驗之研究。國立嘉義大學家庭教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    李淑娥(譯)(1998)。Don Hamachek著。面對自己Encounters with the Self。台北:心理出版社。
    周文欽、賴保禎、歐滄和等(2003)。心理與教育測驗。台北:國立中大學。
    周怜利(譯)(2000)。Erik H. Erikson, Joan M. Erikson & Helen Q. Kivnick著。人生八大階段Erikson老年研究報告。台北:張老師出版社。
    林芳美(1994)。青少年之自我統整、行為困擾及人格特質之相關研究。國立台中師範學院初等教育學系碩士論文,未出版。
    林清財(1984)。青少年自我統整與心理特質關係之研究。國立政治大學教育研所碩士論文,未出版。
    邱皓政(2000)。社會與行為科學的量化研究與統計分析:SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。台北:五南出版社。
    唐先梅(1996)。雙薪家庭工作、家事、及休閒時間分配之研究(行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告,編號:NSC85-2412-H-180-00)。
    唐先梅(1998)。從家庭發展觀點探討雙薪家庭兩性工作、家世、及休閒之分配。論文發表於國立中央大學通識教育中心主辦之「第三屆當前台灣社會與文化變遷」學術研討會,桃園。
    高淑貴、賴爾柔、莊雅萌(1988)。雙生涯家庭親職角色之研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告NSC75-0301-H002-32F。
    張劭勳、林秀娟(1995)。SPSS for Windows 統計分析-初等統計與高等統計上下冊。台北:松崗出版社。
    張佩韻(1999)。離婚單親父親父職角色與親子關係之研究。中國文化大學兒童福利研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    梁雲霞(1986)。大學生自我統整成訧動機、性別角色與事業發展之相關研究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    郭佳華(2001)。父親參與父職教育方案相關因素之研究。國立嘉義大學家庭教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    郭燕如(1987)。父母管教態度對青少年自我認同與價值取向的影響。中國文化大學家政學研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    郭靜晃、吳幸玲(譯)(1993)。Philip Newman & Barbara Newman著。心理社會理論與實務 發展心理學。台北:揚智文化。
    郭靜晃、李淑娟、曾端真、陳淑琦、王淑芬、張惠芬等(1994)。心理學。台北:揚智文化。
    陳淑貞(1993)。父親涉入子女生活及其相關因素之研究。私立中國文化大學家政研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    彭昌義(1991)。大學生皈依佛教信仰之歷程研究:深度訪談分析。輔仁大學應用心理學研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    曾慧敏(1984)。自我統整、性別角色與Erikson 心理社會發展關係之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    游淑燕(1986)。年級、性別、自我統整與成敗歸因關係之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    湯梅英(1985)。犯罪少年與一般少年自我統整及生活適應之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    黃坤瑛(1989)。影響父職角色扮演因素之研究:雙工作家庭與單工作家庭之比較。國立台灣大學農業推廣學研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    黃淑芬(1970)。大學生自我統整與職業成熟及自我確認的關係。國立臺灣師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    賴信真(1996)。台灣當代職業女性議題研究─以民生報婦女版為分析場域(1989─1996)。國立中央大學歷史學系碩士論文,未出版。
    謝明華(2003)。國小學童之父親參與、幸福感及學業成就之相關研究。國立彰化師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    貳、英文部分
    Almeida, D. M., & Galambos, N. L. (1991). Examining father involvement and the quality of father-adolescent relations. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 1, 155-172.
    Amato, P. (1998). More than money ? Men’s contribution to their children’s lives. In A. Booth & A. C. Crouter (Eds.), Men in families: When do they get involved? What difference does it make? (pp.241-275). Mahwah, NJ: Lawernce Eribaum Associates.
    Amato, P. R., & Rivera, F. (1999). Paternal involvement and children’s behavior problems. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 375-384.
    Arcona, A. P. (2001). Predictors of paternal involvement and father-son relationship quality. Unpublished philosophize doctor’ thesis., Virginia Commonwealth University.
    Bailey, W. T. (1992). Psychological development in men: Generativity and involvement with young children. Psychological Reports, 71, 929-930.
    Bailey, W. T. (1994). Psychological development in women: Generativity. Psychological Reports, 74, 286.
    Barnett, R. C., & Baruch, G. K. (1988). Correlates of fathers’ participation in family work. In P. Bronstein & C. P. Cowan (Eds.), Fatherhood today: Men’s changing role in the family(pp.66-78). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
    Belsky, J. (1984). The determinants of parenting: A process model. Cild Development, 55, 83-96.
    Belsky, J. (1984). The determinants of parenting: A processmodel. Child development, 55, 83-96.
    Belsky, J. (1990). Parental and no parental care and children’s socioemotional development: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 885-903.
    Biller, H. B. (1993). Fathers and familie: Paternal factors in child development. Westport, CN: Auburn House.
    Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss. New York: Basic.
    Brayfield, A (1995). Juggling jobs and kids: The impact of employment schedules on fathers’ caring for children. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 321-332.
    Brownson, C. G. (2002). Working Father’s participation in parenting: and exploration of dominant discourses and paternal participation. Unpublished philosophize doctor’ thesis, The University of Texas at Austin.
    Casper, L. M., & O’Connell, M. (1998). Work, income, the economy, and married fathers as child-care providers. Demography, 35, 243-250.
    Crain, W. C. (1980). Theories of development: Concepts and applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
    Crouter, A. C., Helms-Erikson, H., Updegraff, K., & Mchale, S. M. (1999). Conditions underlying parents’ knowledge about childhood: Between and within family comparison. Child Development, 70, 246-259.
    Darling-Fisher, C. S. (1987). The relationship between mothers’ and fathers’ Eriksonian psychosocial attributes, perceptions of family support, and adaptation to parenthood. Doctoral dissertation of The University of Michigan.
    Darling-Fisher, C. S., & Leidy, N. K. (1988). Measuring Eriksonian development in the adult: The Modified Erikson Psychosocial Stage Inventory. Psychological Reports, 62, 747-754.
    De Luccie, M. F. (1995). Mothers as gatekeepers: A model of maternal mediators of father involvement. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 156, 115-131.
    Dicaprio, N. S. (1983). Personality theories: A guide to human nature. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
    Doherty, W. J., Kouneski, E. F., & Erickson, M. F. (1998). Responsible fathering: An overview and conceptual framework. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 277-292.
    Dollahite, D. C., & Hawkins, A. J. (1998). Fatherwork: A conceptual ethic of fathering as generative work. Retrieved July 15, 2002, from http://fatherwork.byu.edu/model.htm
    Dollahite, D. C., & Hawkins, A. J. (Fall 1998). A conceptural ethic of generative fathering. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 7(1), 109-132.
    Dollahite, D. C., Hawkins, A. J., & Brotherson, S. E.(1997). Fatherwork: A conceptual ethic of fathering as generative work. In A. J. Hawkins & D. C. Dollahite (Eds.), Generative fathering: Beyond deficit perspectives (pp. 17-35). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Dollahite, D. C., Morris, S. M., & Hawkins, A. J. (1997). Questions and activities for teaching about generative fathering in university courses. In A. J. Hawkins & D. C. Dollahite (Eds.), Generative fathering: Beyond deficit perspectives (pp. 228-241). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Downey, D.B., & Powel, B. (1993). Do children in single-parent households fare better living with same-sex parents? Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 55-71.
    Duck, S. (1988). Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research, and interventions. New York: Wiley.
    Eggebeen, D. J., & Knoester, C. (2001). Does fatherhood matter for men? Journal of Marriage & Family, 63, 381-394.
    Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and society. New York: W. W. Norton.
    Erikson, E. H. (1959). Identity and the life cycle. Psychological Issues, 1,(1, Monograph 1).
    Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and society (2nd ed). New York: W. W. Norton.
    Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: W. W. Norton.
    Erikson, E. H. (1975). Life history and the historical moment. New York: W. W. Norton.
    Erikson, E. H. (1982). The life cycle completed: A review. New York: W. W. Norton.
    Erikson, E. H., & Erikson, J. M. (1981). On generativity and identity. Harvard Educational Review, 51(2), 249-269.
    Frager, R. & Fadiman, J. (1984). Personality and personal growth. New York: Harper and Row.
    Goltrane, S. (1996). Family man. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Grusec, J. E., & Lytton, H. (1988). Social development history, theory, and research. New York: Springer Verlag.
    Hair, Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, T. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis with reading (5th ed). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Hawkins, A. J., & Dollahite, D. C. (1997). Generative Fathering –Beyond Deficit Perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Hawley, G.. A. (1984). Construction and validation of an Eriksonian Measure of Psychosocial Development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (No. 8425485).
    Higgins, E. T., Ruble, D. N., & Hartup, W. W.. (1985). Social cognition and social development: A sociocultural perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Ihinger-Tallman, M., Pasley, K., & Buehler, C. (1993). Developing a middle-range theory of father involvement postdivorce. Journal of Family Issue, 14, 550-571.
    Ishii-Kuntz, M. (1992). Are Japanese families “fatherless”? Sociology and Social Research, 76, 105-110.
    Ishii-Kuntz, M., Coltrane, S. (1992). Predicting the sharing and household labor: Are parenting and housework distinct? Sociological Perspectives, 35, 629-647.
    Kumagai, F. (1981). Filial violence: A peculiar parent-child relationship in the Japanese family today. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 12, 337-349.
    Lamb M. E. (2000). The history of research on father involvement: An overview. Marriage & Family Review, 29(2/3), 22-42.
    Lamb, M. E. (1975). Fathers: Forgotten contributors to child development. Human Development. 18. 245-266.
    Lamb, M. E. (1977). The development of mother-infant and father-infant attachments in the second year of life. Development Psychology, 13, 637-648.
    Lamb, M. E. (1979). Paternal influences and the father’s role . American Psychologist, 34, 938-943.
    Lamb, M. E. (1997). Fathers and child development: An introductory overview and guide. In M. E. Lamb(Ed.), The role of the father in child development (pp.1-18). New York,: John Wiley & Sons.
    Lamb, M. E. (1997). The role of the father in child development. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
    LaRossa, R., (1988). Fatherhood and social change. Family Relations,37, 451-457.
    Leidy, N. K., & Darling-Fisher, C. S. (1995). Reliability and validity of the Modified Erikson Psychosocial Stage Inventory in diverse samples. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 17(2), 168-187.
    Marcucci, P. A. (2001). When dad is a firefighter: Paternal involvement, parental satisfaction and child’s well-being. Unpublished philosophize doctor’ thesis. Californian school of professional psychology Berkeley/Alameda.
    Marsiglio, W. (1991). Paternal engagement activities with minor children. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 973-986.
    McDaniel, E. (1994). Understanding educational measurement. Iowa: Wm. C. Brown Publisher.
    Nock, S. L. (1979). The family life cycle: Empirical or conceptual tool? Journal of Marriage and the family, 41, 15-26.
    Park, R. D. (1996). Fatherhood. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Pleck, E. H., & Pleck, J. H. (1997). Fatherhood ideals in the United States: Historical dimensions. In M. E. Lamb (Ed.), The role of father in child development (3rd ed) (pp.33-48). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
    Pleck, J. H. (1997). Paternal involvement: Levels, sources, and consequences. In M. E. Lamb (Ed.), The role of the father in child development (3rd ed., pp.66-103). New York: Wiley.
    Pleck, J. H. (1997). Paternal Involvement: Levels, Sources, and Consequences. In M. E. Lamb (Ed.), The role of the father in child development (3rd ed) (pp.66-103). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
    Pruett, K. D. (1993). The paternal presence: Families in society. The Journal of Contemporary Human Services, January, 46-50.
    Radin, N. (1982). Primary caregiving and role-sharing fathers. In M. E. Lamb(Ed.), Nontraditional families: Parenting and child development (pp. 173-204). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    Radin, N., & Sagi, A. (1982). Childrearing fathers in intact families in Israel and the U.S.A. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 31, 375-383.
    Rockville, M. (2000). Factors associated with fathers’ care giving activities and sensitivity with young children. Journal of Family Psychology, 14, 200-219.
    Rosenthal, D. A., Gurney, R. M., & Moore, S. M. (1981). From trust to intimacy: A new inventory for examining Erikson’s stage of psychosocial development. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 10(6), 525-537.
    Sanderson, S., & Thompson, V. S. (2002). Factors associated with perceived paternal involvement in childrearing. Sex Roles, 46, 99-111.
    Schock, A. M., Gavazzi, S. M., Fristad, M. A., & Golderg-Armold, J. S. (2002). The role of father participation in the treatment of childhood mood disorders. Family Relations, 51, 230-237.
    Shwalb, D. W., Imaizumi, N., & Nakazawa, J. (1987). The modern Japanese father: Roles and problems in a changing society. In M. E. Lamb (Ed.), The father’s role: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp.247-269). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    Snarey, J. (1993). How fathers care for the next generation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Snarey, J. (1997). Foreword: The next generation of work on fathering. In A. J. Hawkins & D. C. Dollahite (Eds.), Generative fathering: Beyond deficit perspectives (pp.ix-xii). Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
    Spanier, G. B., Sauer, W., & Larzelere, R. (1979). An empirical evaluation of the family life cycle. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 27-38.
    Teachman, J., Day, R., Paasch, K., Carver,& Call, V.(1998). Sibling resemblance in behavioral and cognitive outcomes: The role of father presence. Journal of Marriage and the Family,60, 835-848.

    QR CODE