簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表
研究生： 莊媮茹
Chuang, Yu-Ru
論文名稱： 國中教師對於〈十二年國民基本教育英語文課程綱要〉國中學習階段學習表現條目的看法
Teachers’ Perceptions of the Learning Performance Items in the 12-year Basic Education Curriculum Guidelines for Junior High School English
指導教授： 程玉秀
Cheng, Yuh-Show
學位類別： 碩士
Master
系所名稱： 英語學系
Department of English
論文出版年： 2017
畢業學年度： 105
語文別： 英文
論文頁數： 203
中文關鍵詞： 國中英語 、十二年基本國民教育 、英語課程綱要 、學習表現條目
英文關鍵詞： Junior High School English, the 12-year Basic Education, English Curriculum Guidelines, Learning Performance Items
DOI URL： https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202202734
論文種類： 學術論文
相關次數： 點閱：218  下載：21 
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

    • 十二年國民基本教育已於103學年度實施，因應此教育制度而生的新課程綱要也即將在108學年度正式施行。〈十二年國民基本教育英語文課程綱要〉國中學習階段的特色在於加進了邏輯思考、判斷與創造力的培養以及加強策略學習。教師對於新課綱學習表現條目的看法會影響之後課程實施的效益，因此本研究旨在探討國中英語教師對於新課綱中的學習表現條目的看法。
    來自台灣各縣市的163位國中英文教師參與問卷調查研究，其中17位教師願意接受事後訪談。教師針對五點量表問卷中的學習表現條目，分別圈選其重要性與可行性程度。事後訪談題目主要探討教師勾選相對之下較不重要或較不可行的學習表現條目的想法、實行上的困難和挑戰與對新課綱的建議。研究者使用了描述性數據、t檢定以及ANOVA 來分析教師對於每個學習表現條目之重要性與可行性的看法以及不同背景教師對於學校表現條目之重要性與可行性看法的差異。訪談資料則採用內容分析。
    本研究發現教師大致認為各學習表現條目的重要性高於其可行性，且不同背景教師對於學校表現條目的重要性或可行性看法並無太大差異。訪談內容顯示教師普遍認為新課綱所陳列之學習表現條目非常完整，但因新課綱時數縮減、學生英語程度差異低落、生活經驗與學習習慣等因素之影響會造成實行上的困難。教師並建議有關當局舉辦相關的工作坊、研習以及提供觀課機會。依據本研究的主要發現，研究者對有關當局、國中英語教師及未來研究者提出具體建議。

    The 12-year Basic Education has officially launched in the academic year 103. The new Guidelines will take effect in the academic year 108. The 12-year Basic Education Curriculum Guidelines for Junior High School English features an inclusion of cultivating students’ critical thinking skills and an emphasis on language learning strategies. Teachers’ perceptions of the learning performance items may affect the effectiveness of the curriculum implementation. Thus, the present study aims to investigate teachers’ perceptions of the learning performance items in the new Guidelines.
    A total of 163 junior high school English teachers participated in the survey study. Seventeen of them accepted the invitation for follow-up interviews. Teachers rated the importance as well as the feasibility of each learning performance item on a five-point Likert scale. The follow-up interview questions explored teachers’ opinions of the learning performance items that received relatively low scores on importance and feasibility level, difficulties and challenges of implementing the items, and suggestions for the new Guidelines. The researcher used descriptive statistics, t-tests, and AVOVA to reveal teachers’ perceived importance and feasibility of the learning performance items and the effects of teachers’ backgrounds on their perceived importance and feasibility of the learning performance items. Interview data was analyzed by content analysis.
    The present study found that teachers generally perceived the importance level of the learning performance items higher than the feasibility level. Mostly, teachers with different backgrounds did not differ significantly in their perceptions of the learning performance items. The interview results showed that on the whole, teachers considered the learning performance items were comprehensive, but limited class periods, students’ low proficiency level, life experience, and learning habits might cause difficulties in realizing the goals. Teachers further suggested that the authorities concerned should hold related workshops and seminars, and provide classroom teaching demonstrations. Based on the major findings of the present study, the researcher provided suggestions to the authorities concerned, junior high school English teachers, and future researchers.

    Keywords: Junior High School English, the 12-year Basic Education, English Curriculum Guidelines, Learning Performance Items

    TABLE OF CONTENTS CHINESE ABSTRACT i ABSTRACT ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iv TABLE OF CONTENTS v LIST OF TABLES viii CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1 Research Background 1 Significance of the Study 5 Research Questions 6 CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW 8 The General Curriculum Guidelines of 12-Year Basic Education 8 The 12-Year Basic Education Curriculum Guidelines for Junior High School English 10 Factors Influencing Curriculum Implementation 17 The Importance of Teachers’ Perception in Curriculum Implementation 19 CHAPTER THREE METHOD 24 Participants 24 Instruments 31 Data Collection Procedures 32 Data Analysis Procedures 32 CHAPTER FOUR RESULTS 34 Questionnaire Results 34 Teachers’ Perceptions of the Learning Performance Items on Listening 35 Teachers’ Perceptions of the Learning Performance Items on Speaking 37 Teachers’ Perceptions of the Learning Performance Items on Reading 41 Teachers’ Perceptions of the Learning Performance Items on Writing 44 Teachers’ Perceptions of the Learning Performance Items on Integrated Skills 46 Teachers’ Perceptions of the Learning Performance Items on Interests in and Attitudes Toward Learning English 49 Teachers’ Perceptions of the Learning Performance Items on Methods and Strategies in Learning English 52 Teachers’ Perceptions of the Learning Performance Items on Culture and Custom 54 Teachers’ Perceptions of the Learning Performance Items on Logical Thinking, Judgement, and Creativity 56 Teachers’ Perceptions of the Learning Performance Items on Different Learning Categories 58 Effects of Teachers’ Background Information on Their Perceptions of the Learning Performance Items 65 Effects of Teachers’ Background Information on Their Perceptions of Learning Performance Items on Listening 66 Effects of Teachers’ Background Information on Their Perceptions of Learning Performance Items on Speaking 76 Effects of Teachers’ Background Information on Their Perceptions of Learning Performance Items on Reading 87 Effects of Teachers’ Background Information on Their Perceptions of Learning Performance Items on Writing 100 Effects of Teachers’ Background Information on Their Perceptions of Learning Performance Items on Integrated Skills 108 Effects of Teachers’ Background Information on Their Perceptions of Learning Performance Items on Interests in and Attitudes Toward Learning English 119 Effects of Teachers’ Background Information on Their Perceptions of Learning Performance Items on Methods and Strategies in Learning English 128 Effects of Teachers’ Background Information on Their Perceptions of Learning Performance Items on Culture and Custom 135 Effects of Teachers’ Background Information on Their Perceptions of Learning Performance Items on Logical Thinking, Judgement, and Creativity 144 Interview Results 150 Teachers’ Unfamiliarity with the New Curriculum Guidelines and the Learning Performance Items 150 Teachers’ Difficulty in Understanding the Statements or Concepts of the Learning Performance Items 151 Teachers’ Worries About Insufficient Instruction Time 153 Teachers’ Worries About the Achievability of the Learning Performance Items (With Reference to Students’ Proficiency Level, Experience, and Habits) 155 A Need for Professional Development in Certain Areas 160 A Need for More Supplementary Materials and Teaching Resources 162 A Need for Support from the Government 163 CHAPTER FIVE DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION 165 Discussion of Major Findings 166 Teachers’ Perceived Importance and Feasibility of the Learning Performance Items 166 Teachers’ Opinions of the Learning Performance Items 170 Implications of the Present Study 172 Limitations and Suggestions for Future Research 173 REFERENCES 175 Appendix A 185 Appendix B 193 Appendix C 194

    REFERENCES
    Alfares, N. (2014) Using the textbook to promote thinking skills in intermediate school EFL classrooms in Saudi Arabia: an analysis of the tasks and an exploration of teachers’ behaviours and perceptions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Glasgow, United Kingdom.
    Allen, L. Q. (2002). Teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and the standards for foreign language learning. Foreign Language Annuals, 35, 518-529.
    Almalki, M. M. (2014). Teacher perception of a new English as a Foreign Language (EFL) curriculum in Saudi Arabia. Unpublished master’s thesis, State University of New York at Fredonia, NY.
    Altaieb, S. R. (2013). Teachers’ perception of the English language curriculum in Libyan public Schools: An investigation and assessment of implementation process of English curriculum in Libyan public high schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Denver, Colorado.
    Altrichter, H. (2005). Curriculum implementation–limiting and facilitating factors. In P. Nentwig & D. Waddington (Eds.), Context based learning of science, (pp.35-62). Munster: Waxmann.
    Carless, D. (2003). Factors in the implementation of task-based teaching in primary schools. System, 31, 485-500.
    Carless, D. (2007). Learning‐oriented assessment: conceptual bases and practical implications. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44, 57-66.
    Chang, C, M. (2015). An investigation of incorporating English listening in the Comprehensive Assessment Program for junior high schools [國中教育會考加考英語聽力之調查研究](Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Kang Ning, Tainan, Taiwan.
    Chang, W. C. (張武昌) (2006). English language education in Taiwan: A comprehensive survey [台灣的英語教育：現況與省思]. Education Resources and Research, 69, 129-144.
    Chang, W. C., Cheng, Y. S., Yeh, H. N., Hsu, Y. K., Chen. H. R., Chen, C. L & Lin, C. C. (張武昌、程玉秀、葉錫南、許月貴、陳浩然、陳秋蘭、林至誠（2012）An integrated research project on the English Curriculum Guidelines at elementary and junior high school level [中小學英語課程綱要整合型研究]. Retrieved from http://www.naer.edu.tw/ezfiles/0/1000/img/49/NAER-102-06-A-1-02-02-1-11.pdf
    Chang, W.C., Yang, C. S., Yeh, H.N., You, Y. L., Chen, C. L., Lin, Y. S., Lin. S.Y., Wu, J. Y& Huang, Z. X. (張武昌、楊承淑、葉錫南、游毓玲、陳秋蘭、林于仙、林欣誼、吳俊穎、黃琮軒) (2013). The 12-year compulsory education curriculum system constructing program – sub-project two: the 12-year compulsory education of foreign language curriculum [十二年國民基本教育外國語文領域綱要內容之前導研究-子計畫二：十二年國民基本教育外國語文領域綱要內容之前導研究]. (NAER-102-06-A-1-02-02-1-11). Retrieved from http://www.naer.edu.tw/ezfiles/0/1000/img/49/
    NAER-102-06-A-1-02-02-1-11.pdf
    Chen, C. L. (2012). Teachers’ and student’s perceptions of the competence indicators in National Curriculum Guidelines for Senior High School English. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
    Chen, K. L. (2010). Investigating junior and senior high school English Teachers’ perception toward the English Curriculum Guidelines. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Changhua University of Education, Changhua, Taiwan.
    Chen, S. R. (2003) Teachers’ attitudes toward the Grade 1-9 Curriculum: a study on junior high school EFL teachers in Taipei city. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taipei Teachers College, Taipei, Taiwan.
    Cheng, Y. C. (1996). School effectiveness and school-based management: A mechanism for development. Psychology Press.
    Cheng, Y. S. (程玉秀) (2015). The policy of incorporating thinking skills into curriculum objectives: Its formation and practice [思考能力納入高中英文課程政目標之政策：形塑與實踐]. Cultivating Critical Thinking Skills: Taking English Education at Senior High School Level as an Example (pp. 37-57). Taipei: Crane Publishing Co.
    Cheng, Y. S, Yeh, H. N., & Su, S. F. (程玉秀、葉錫南、蘇順發) (2011). Planning,
    implementation, and expected impact of the 2010 Curriculum Guidelines for Senior High School English: Teachers' perspectives [九十九年「普通高級中學英文科課程綱要」之規劃、實施與預期效果：教師觀點]. English Teaching & Learning, 35, 91-137.
    Chuang, H. W. (2013). The creative journey to English poetry: a story about my gifted class. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
    Choi, T. H. (2016). Glocalisation of English language education: Comparison of three contexts in East Asia. In Sociological and philosophical perspectives on education in the Asia-Pacific region (pp. 147-164). Singapore: Springer.
    Chung, I. F., & Huang, Y. C. (2009). The implementation of communicative language teaching: An investigation of students’ viewpoints. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 18, 67-78.
    Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Los Angeles, LA: Sage.
    Fok, S. C. (2002). Teaching critical thinking skills in a Hong Kong secondary school. Asia Pacific Education Review, 3, 83-91
    Fullan, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
    Ghanizadeh, A., & Heydarnejad, T. (2015). A cross-contextual analysis of Iranian EFL teachers' attitudes and perceptions of critical thinking. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 4, 27-38.
    Gill, P., Stewart, K., Treasure, E., & Chadwick, B. (2008). Methods of data collection in qualitative research: Interviews and focus groups. British Dental Journal, 204, 291-295.
    Gorsuch, G. (2000). EFL educational policies and educational cultures: Influences on teachers’ approval of communicative activities. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 675-710.
    Gregoire, M. (2003). Is it a challenge or a threat? A dual-process model of teachers' cognition and appraisal processes during conceptual change. Educational Psychology Review, 15, 147-179.
    Grenfell, M., & Harris, V. (1999). Modern languages and learning strategies: In theory and practice. NY: Psychology Press.
    Gwarjiko, U. I. (2015). English as a second language teachers’ perception of new English language curriculum in Niger state, Nigeria. European Journal of Language Studies, 2, 12-21.
    Hong-Nam, K., & Leavell, A. G. (2007). A comparative study of language learning strategy use in an EFL context: Monolingual Korean and bilingual Korean-Chinese university students. Asia Pacific Education Review, 8, 71-88.
    Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1277-1288.
    Hu, G. (2005). CLT is best for China—an untenable absolutist claim. ELT Journal, 59, 65-68.
    Huang, Y. Y. (2014). Critical thinking instruction for senior high school students in Taiwan: designing, implementation and assessment. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
    Hung, Y. P. (2015). Communicative language teaching in Taiwan: Teachers’ perceptions and practices. Unpublished master’s thesis, Ming Chuan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
    Hwang, Jenq-Jye., &, L, Ya-Ting. (2013). Implementation of Taiwan’s curriculum reform policy. In Curriculum Innovations in Changing Societies (pp. 61-84). SensePublishers.
    Kabilan, M. K. (2000). Creative and critical thinking in language classrooms. The Internet TESL Journal, 6, 1-3.
    Kendall, L. (2008). The conduct of qualitative interviews: Research questions, methodological issues, and researching online. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear & D. J. Leu (Eds.), Handbook of Research on New Literacies (pp. 133-150). NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    Kırkgöz, Y. (2008). A case study of teachers’ implementation of curriculum innovation in English language teaching in Turkish primary education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 1859-1875.
    Kruger, M., Won, M., & Treagust, D. F. (2013). Teachers’ perceptions on the changes in the curriculum and exit examinations for Biology and human Biology. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38, 41-58.
    Lee, M. H., & Gopinathan, S. (2015). Globalization and education reforms in Hong Kong and Singapore. In Second International Handbook on Globalisation, Education and Policy Research (pp. 695-715). Springer Netherlands.
    Li, D. (1998). It's always more difficult than you plan and imagine: Teachers' perceived difficulties in introducing the communicative approach in South Korea. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 677-703.
    Lin, Y, F. (林永豐) (2015). New Curriculum Guidelines, new perspectives—the difficulties and adjustments of competence indicators [新課綱，新觀點—能力指標的困境與調整]. Taiwan Educational Review Monthly, 4, 203-207
    Lin, Y. Y. (2013). Using literature circles to develop critical thinking skills in a senior high EFL classroom in Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Cheng Chi University, Taipei, Taiwan.
    Littlewood, W. (2013). Developing a context-sensitive pedagogy for communication-oriented language teaching. English Teaching, 68, 3-25.
    Long, C. J. (2003). Teaching critical thinking in Asian EFL contexts: Theoretical issues and practical applications. In Proceedings of the 8th Conference of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics (pp. 229-234).
    Mattarima, K., & Hamdan, A. R. (2016). The teaching constraints of English as a foreign language in Indonesia: the context of school based curriculum. Sosiohumanika, 4, 287-300.
    Ministry of Education. (教育部) (2006). Grade 1-9 Curriculum Guidelines English [國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要-語文學習領域 (英語)]. Retrieved from http://www.edu.tw/EDU_WEB/EDU_MGT/EJE/EDU5147002/9CC/English-1.do.
    Ministry of Education. (教育部) (2007). The plan to promote 12-year Compulsory education [推動十二年國民基本教育說帖－國民的權利，國家的義務]. Retrieved from http://english.m.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem= 7084&ctNode=784
    National Academy for Education Research (國家教育研究院) (2014). 12-year Compulsory Education Curriculum Outline [十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱草案)] Retrieved from http://www.naer.edu.tw/ezfiles/0/1000/attach/15/pta_2279_
    8619537_09968.pdf
    National Academy for Education Research (國家教育研究院) (2015). 12-year Compulsory Education English Curriculum Outline[十二年國民基本教育課程綱要國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校語文領域-英語文(草案)]
    Retrieved from http://www.naer.edu.tw/ezfiles/0/1000/attach/93/pta_101213877183_00873.pdf
    National Academy for Education Research (國家教育研究院) (2015). Curriculum Specifications for 12-year Compulsory Education Curriculum Outline for English and Second Foreign Language [十二年國民基本教育語文領域(英語文、第二外國語文)課程綱要研修說明].
    Retrieved from http://english.tyhs.edu.tw/~english/download/20150818B.pdf
    Nishino, T., & Watanabe, M. (2008). Communication‐oriented policies versus classroom realities in Japan. TESOL Quarterly, 42, 133-138.
    Ok, L. K. (2003). The relationship of school year, sex and proficiency on the use of learning strategies in learning English of Korean junior high school students. Asian EFL Journal, 5, 1-36.
    Orafi, S. M. S., Borg, S. (2009). Intentions and realities in implementing communicative curriculum reform. System, 37, 243-253.
    Pan, B. (2015, April 22-24). A comparative study of English language planning and policy for senior secondary education between Mainland China and Hong Kong. Paper presented at 2015 International Conference on Arts, Design and Contemporary Education. doi:10.2991/icadce-15.2015.152
    Peacock, M., & Ho, B. (2003). Student language learning strategies across eight disciplines. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13, 179-200.
    Phan, N. T. (2015). Approaches to curriculum development in Vietnamese higher education: A case study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane Australia.
    Shiau, J. C. (2010). Using Reciprocal Teaching to Develop Thinking in a Senior High EFL Classroom in Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
    Shen, Y. J. (2016). Combining Picture Books with Critical Thinking in a High School EFL Classroom in Taiwan: A Case Study of a Municipal Senior High School in Taoyuan City. National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan.
    Shirkhani, S., & Fahim, M. (2011). Enhancing critical thinking in foreign language learners. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 111-115.
    Silver, R. E., & Skuja-steele, R. (2005). Priorities in English language education policy and classroom implementation. Language Policy, 4, 107-128.
    Silver, R., Hu, G., & Iino, M. (2002). English language education in China, Japan, and Singapore. Singapore: National Institute of Education.
    Stewart, T. (2009). Will the new English curriculum for 2013 work. The Language Teacher, 33, 9-13.
    Su, Y. C. (2006). EFL teachers’ perceptions of English language policy at the elementary level in Taiwan. Educational Studies, 32, 265-283.
    Sulaiman, T., Ayub, A. F. M., & Sulaiman, S. (2015). Curriculum change in English language curriculum advocates higher order thinking skills and standards-based assessments in Malaysian primary schools. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6, 494-500.
    Sung, C. M. (宋秋美) (2005). An action research for communicative English teaching implementing in an elementary school: an example of fourth graders. [國小實施「溝通式英語教學」之行動研究：以四年級學生為例]. Journal of National Taipei University of Education, 18, 267-296.
    Ting, J. P. (丁瑞碧) (2008). An investigation on curriculum articulation problems and related coping strategies between junior high schools and senior high schools in Taichung City and Taichung County--Taking English course for an example. [國高中英語課程銜接問題及因應策略之研究--以台中縣市為例](Unpublished master’s thesis). National Changhua University of Education, Changhua, Taiwan.
    Tsai, H. J. (2013). The effects of reciprocal teaching on reading comprehension of students with different competence in English. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
    Wang, H. (2006). An implementation study of the English as a foreign language curriculum policies in the Chinese tertiary context. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Queen’s University, Canada.
    Wang, H. (2008). Language policy implementation: A look at teachers’ perceptions. Asian EFL Journal, 30, 1-38.
    Wang, W. F., & Lam, A. S. L. (2009). The English language curriculum for senior secondary school in China: Its evolution from 1949. RELC, 40, 65-82.
    Waters, A., & Vilches, M. L. C. (2008). Factors affecting ELT reforms the case of the Philippines Basic Education Curriculum. RELC Journal, 39, 5-24.
    Wong, C. L. (2015). The Relationship between English Teaching and the Twelve-Year Public Education Program A Case Study of a Junior High School in Taichung City [國民中學英語教育與十二年國教關係之研究-以臺中市一所國中為例] (Unpublished master’s thesis). Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan.
    Yeh, H. C. (葉信成)（2011）。A Study of Communicative Language Teaching integrated into English Curricula on English oral proficiency performance among junior high school students [溝通式教學法融入英語課程對國中學生英語口語能力表現之影響] (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Changhua University of Education, Changhua, Taiwan.
    Yook, C. M. (2010). Korean teachers’ beliefs about English language education and their impacts upon the Ministry of Education-initiated reforms. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgia State University, U.S.A.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE