研究生: |
葉璞之 Yeh, Pu-Chih |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
國中生物科教師對十二年國教課綱之認知初探 A Preliminary Exploration on Junior High School Biology Teachers' Perceptions of the Twelve-Year Basic Education Curriculum Guidelines |
指導教授: |
劉湘瑤
Liu, Shiang-Yao |
口試委員: |
温媺純
Wen, Mei-Chun 張永達 Chang, Yung-Ta 劉湘瑤 Liu, Shiang-Yao |
口試日期: | 2022/08/16 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
科學教育研究所 Graduate Institute of Science Education |
論文出版年: | 2022 |
畢業學年度: | 110 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 97 |
中文關鍵詞: | 108課綱 、國中生物科教師 、十二年國教 、教師信念 、教育改革 |
英文關鍵詞: | Twelve-year Basic Education Curriculum Guidelines, biology teachers in junior high schools, teachers’ beliefs, educational reform |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202201685 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:117 下載:14 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
〈十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱〉於民國103年發佈。因應此教育改革而 生的各領域課程綱要,也於民國108年正式實施。在〈十二年國民基本教育課程綱 要——自然科學領域〉中,有許多和舊課綱不同之處。本研究探討國民中學生物 科教師對於新課綱學習表現和學習內容條目的看法,藉以瞭解新課綱實施的現況, 並探究現場生物教師是否能在此變化中落實新課綱理念。
本研究邀請來自台灣各縣市65位國中生物科教師參與問卷調查,並聯繫其中 願意進行後續訪談的10位教師,進行深入討論。受測教師針對自然領域中20條學習 表現,在五點量表上,圈選其認為的重要性和可行性程度;同時,也針對與生物 科重點相關的42條學習內容條目,進行十點量表的投注心力評比。問卷後的訪談 題目,聚焦在教師問卷回覆中,認為相對不重要或不可行的學習表現以及學習內 容條目,進一步了解教師產生此想法的原因、實行上的困難處,以及他們對新課 綱的評論和建議。
研究結果發現,教師普遍認同課綱中羅列之學習表現的重要性,但是對於可 行性的認同卻相對較低;同時也發現,部分教師以教科書編排角度看待課綱的學 習內容條目,而非從課綱角度出發。針對上述情形,研究者對於課綱理想的落實 層面,提出下列幾項建議:一、學習表現的落實需要更具體的作法;二、學習表 現與學習內容的連結性需要再加強;三、教科書內容不應成為箝制教師教學的枷 鎖;四、教師應從解讀課綱內容的角度判斷教科書的應用。
The "Twelve-year National Basic Education Curriculum Outline" was promulgated in 2014, and new curriculum guidelines for various fields that were born in response to this educational reform were officially implemented in 2019. The "Twelve-year Basic Education Curriculum Guidelines—Natural Science" differs from old curriculum guidelines in many aspects. This study explores the views of biology teachers on the learning performance and learning content items in the new curriculum so as to sketch the current status of their implementation in junior high schools and to examine how biology teachers realize the new curriculum.
In this study, 65 junior high school biology teachers from around Taiwan participated in a questionnaire survey, and 10 of them took part in the follow-up interviews for in-depth discussion. The participants circled the degrees of importance and feasibility respectively on a five-point scale regarding the 20 items of learning performance in the curriculum. For the 42 items of learning content related to the key points in biology, a 10-point scale was used to show participants’ commitment to each individual item in their teaching. The follow-up interviews focused on the learning performance and learning content items that teachers circled “relatively unimportant” or “relatively unfeasible” in their questionnaire responses, to further explore the reasons why they thought this way, the difficulties in implementing the items, and even their questioning and suggestions for the new curriculum.
The results of the study found that teachers in general agreed on the importance of
learning performance items listed in the curriculum, but their agreement on the
feasibility was relatively low. It was also found that some teachers viewed the learning content from the perspective of textbook arrangement, rather than from the perspective of the curriculum itself. Based on the findings, the researcher puts forward the following suggestions for the implementation of the new curriculum. First, the implementation of learning performance requires more specific practices. Second, the connection between learning performance and learning content needs to be strengthened. Third, the content of textbooks should not become a shackle to restrain teachers' teaching. Fourth, teachers should be aware of the impact of textbooks in their implementation of the new curricuilum.
佘曉清(1999)。生物教師的教學信念、教學、與師生互動—個案研究。科學教育學刊,7(1),35-47。
吳清山(2018)。九年國教五十年誰在乎呢?。臺灣教育評論月刊,7(10),149-150。
林陳涌、徐俊龍、陳建利、張永達、趙振寰、劉湘瑤、劉翠華(2020)。中學生物教材教法。臺北市:五南書局。
洪詠善,范信賢(2015)。同行~走進十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。臺北市:國家教育研究院籌備處。
姚宗翰(2010)。國中生物科教師科學本質觀、教學信念與教學實踐之個案研究(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/46mpf7
黃光雄,蔡清田(2015)。課程發展與設計新論。臺北市:五南書局。
黃茂在、陳文典(2016)。從自然科學課程發展脈絡看新課程的挑戰。科學研習雙月刊,55(11),20-27。
甄曉蘭(2000)。新世紀課程改革的挑戰與課程實踐理論的重建。教育研究集刊,44,61-90。
甄曉蘭(2003)。教師課程意識與教學實踐。教育研究集刊,49(1),63-94。
教育部(2008)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要總綱。
教育部(2008)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要—自然與生活科技學習領域。
教育部(2014)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。
教育部(2018)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要—自然科學領域。
騰邑文化編輯部(2013)。 臺灣教育世紀回顧–民國時期。宜蘭縣:零極限。
Brickhouse, N. W.(1990). Teachers' belief about the nature of Science and teacher relationships to classroom practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 41, 53-62.
Clark, C. M. & Peterson, P. L.(1986). Teachers’thought processes. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed), Handbook of research on curriculum (3rd ed, pp.255-269). New York: Macmillan.
Friedrichsen, P. J., & Barnett, E. (2018). Negotiating the meaning of Next Generation Science Standards in a secondary biology teacher professional learning community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(7), 999-1025.
Giroux. H. A.(1988). Teacher as intellectuals: Toward a pedagogy of learning. Granby, Mass: Bergin & Garvey.
Giroux. H. A.(1994). Teachers, public life, and curriculum reform. Peabody Journal of Education, 69(3), 35-47.
Margot, K. C., & Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: a systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM education, 6(1), 1-16.
Sharp, J. G., Hopkin, R., & Lewthwaite, B. (2011). Teacher Perceptions of Science in the National Curriculum: Findings from an application of the Science Curriculum Implementation Questionnaire in English primary schools. International Journal of Science Education, 33(17), 2407-2436.
郭玉霞(2000)。教師信念。線上檢索日期:2022年1月22日。檢自http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1309942/
呂秀蓮(2016)。臺灣國民教育三波課程改革與課綱的關係。線上檢索日期:2021年11月23日。檢自https://www.ceec.edu.tw/xcepaper/cont?xsmsid=0J066588036013658199&qperoid=0J107397840243107930&sid=0J184537832726476606#
中華民國教育部(2022)。部史全球資訊網。線上檢索日期:2022年2月18日。檢自https://history.moe.gov.tw
行政院全球資訊網(2022)。教育制度。線上檢索日期:2022年4月15日。檢自https://www.ey.gov.tw/state/7F30E01184C37F0E/c533c870-9854-4344-b325-0239147484bd