隨著互動式資訊技術 (Interactive Communication Technologies, ICTs)的迅速發展，同步視頻面試 (Synchronous Video Interview, SVIs)和非同步視頻面試 (Asynchronous Video Interview, AVIs)這兩種人才篩選工具逐漸被企業採納，代表使用的準確性變得更為重要。而也有研究證明，與工作無關的資訊也會影響面試結果，例如性別、外表以及面試官的第一印象。縱然 SVIs 與 AVIs 等新甄選工具已開始普及，但是否因此而得以降低面試官的偏見，至今少有科學化探討的證據，例如面試官在對應徵者溝通技巧及五大人格特質進行評分時，是否受其他干擾因素影響，而這卻是重要的就業甄選標準。
本研究採用準實驗研究法，研究對象由具有豐富面試經驗的人力資
源從業人員擔任，共計完成 118 份有效資料。結果發現應徵者經過美醜
操弄，會影響面試官在外表吸引力的判斷；第一印象與溝通技巧及五大
人格特質評分皆呈現顯著正相關，外表吸引力則僅在溝通技巧評分呈現
顯著，表示第一印象仍是決定面試評分的關鍵；特別發現使用 AVI，可
以抑制第一印象對面試評分的影響，但卻會強化外表吸引力與面試評分
的關係。

With the rapid development of interactive communication technologies (ICTs), synchronous video interviews (SVIs) and asynchronous video interviews (AVIs) are gradually adopted by many organizations. It means that the accuracy of using the ICTs becomes much more important.
Since those two interview modalities are commonly used in employment screening, the accuracy of evaluating job candidates by those ICTs are still unknown, while there is no research to compare which interface synchrony (SVI vs. AVI) provides more accuracy for predicting candidates’ personality traits and communication skills that has been approved as important employment selection criteria. Many empirical studies have shown that information unrelated to work can also affect interview evaluation, such as the candidates’ gender, physical appearance, and first impression. Therefore, the aims of this study are trying to compare the impacts of the first impression and physical appearance on the human raters’ judgement between a SVI and an AVI setting, to test whether first impression and candidate’s appearance would moderate the raters’ judgement, and to find out what lessons learned from the real interviews in both SVI and AVI settings for interviewer education in these computer-mediated interviews.
The study conducted the quasi-experimental research method, and invited 118 experienced human resource (HR) professionals as the raters. We found that our manipulation of candidates’ appearance affected the interviewer's judgment on the appearance attractiveness. First impression was positively associated with communication skills and personality trait scores, but appearance attractiveness was only positively associated with communication skills. Using AVI could lessen the impact of first impression on interview rating, but it strengthens the relationship between appearance attractiveness and interview ratings.

一、中文部份
邱麗家、林淑慧、黃能堂（2012）。內部稽核人員人格特質、成就動機
與工作滿意度關係之研究。勞資關係論叢，14(1)，66-98。
陳建丞（2005）。面談前印象對面試官評量效應之探討：以面談結構性
爲干擾變數。臺大管理論叢，16(1)，155-170。
陳建丞（2005）。應徵者外表吸引力對面試官評量之影響－以面試官訓
練為干擾變數。人力資源管理學報，5(4)，55-66。
陳建丞（2007）。甄選面談中外表與性別歧視之探討：結構式面談能消
除它們嗎？台大管理論叢，17(2)，153-208。

二、外文部份
Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. American Journal of Sociology, 45(1).
Ashmore, R. D., & Del Boca, F. K. (1979). Sex stereotypes and implicit personality theory: Toward a cognitive—social psychological conceptualization. Sex Roles, 5(2), 219-248.
Baert, S. (2018). Facebook profile picture appearance affects recruiters’ first hiring decisions. New Media and Society, 20(3), 1220-1239.
Behrend, T, Toaddy, S., Thompson, L. F., Sharek, D. J. (2012). The effects of avatar appearance on interviewer ratings in virtual employment interviews. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 2128-2133.
Berger, J., Cohen, B. P., & Zelditch, M. (1972). Status Characteristics and Social Interaction. American Sociological Review, 37(3), 241-255.
Brenner, F. S., Ortner, T. M., & Fay, D. (2016). Asynchronous video interviewing as a new technology in personnel selection: The applicant’s point of view. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 863.
Cable, D. M., & Judge, T. A., (1997). Interviewers' perceptions of personorganization fit and organizational selection decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(4), 546-561.
Chapman, D. S., & Webster, J. (2001). Rater correction processes in applicant selection using videoconference technology: The role of attributions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 2518-2537.
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(6), 653-665.
Daft, R.L., & Lengel, R.H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554– 571.
Deakin, H., & Wakefield, K. (2013). Skype interviewing: Reflections of two PhD researchers. SAGE Journals, 14(5).
DeGroot, T., & Gooty, J. (2009). Can nonverbal cues be used to make meaningful personality attributions in employment interviews? Journal of Business and Psychology, 24(2), 179–192.
Dion, K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24(5), 285-290.
Dipboye, R. L. (1997). Structured selection interviews: Why do they work? Why are they underutilized? International Handbook of Selection and Assessment, 455-474.
Eagly, A. H., Ashmore, R. D., Makhijani, M. G., & Longo, L. C. (1991). What is beautiful is good, but….: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin, 110(1), 109-128.
Florea, L., Valcea, S., Hamdani, M. R., & Dougherty, T. W. (2019). From first impressions to selection decisions: The role of dispositional cognitive motivations in the employment interview. Personnel Review, 48(1), 249-272.
Gilmore, D. C., Beehr, T. A., & Love, K. G. (1986). Effects of applicant sex, applicant physical attractiveness, type of rater and type of job on interview decisions. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 59(2), 103109.
Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The Development of Markers for the Big-Five Factor Structure. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 26-42.
Güçlütürk, Y., Güçlü, U., Baró, X., Escalante, H. J., Guyon, I., Escalera, S., Van Gerven, M. A. J.,& Van Lier, R. (2018). Multimodal first impression analysis with deep residual networks. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 9(3), 316-329.
Horai, J., Naccari, N., & Fatoullah, E. (2018). The effects of expertise and physical attractiveness upon opinion agreement and liking. Sociometry, 37(4), 601-606.
Hosoda, M., Stone-Romero, E. F., & Coats, G. (2003) The effects of physical attractiveness on job‐related outcomes: A meta‐analysis of experimental studies. Personnel Psychology. 56(2), 431-462.
Janghorban, R., Roudsari, R., & Taghipour, A. (2014). Skype interviewing: The new generation of online synchronous interview in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 9(1), 24152.
Langer, M., König, C. J., & Fitili, A. (2018). Information as a double-edged sword: The role of computer experience and information on applicant reactions towards novel technologies for personnel selection. Computers in Human Behavior, 81, 19-30.
Langer, M., König, C. J., & Krause, K. (2017). Examining digital interviews for personnel selection: Applicant reactions and interviewer ratings. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 25(4), 371-382.
Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 1–55.
Luchins, A., S. (1957). Definitiveness of Impression and Primacy-Recency in Communications. The Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 275-290.
Madjar, N., Chubarov, E., Zalsman, G., Weiser, M., & Shoval, G. (2019). Social skills, executive functioning and social engagement. Schizophrenia Research: Cognition, 17, 100137.
McArthur, L. Z., & Baron, R. M. (1983). Toward an ecological theory of social perception. Psychological Review, 90(3), 215-238.
Morrow, P. C. (1990). Physical attractiveness and selection decision making. Journal of Management, 16, 45-60.
Nguyen, L. S., & Gatica-Perez, D. (2015). I would hire you in a minute: Thin slices of nonverbal behavior in job interviews, in Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction, Bridgeton, MO, 51–58.
Phillips, A. P., & Dipboye, R. L. (1989). Correlational tests of predictions from a process model of the interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(1), 41-52.
Sackett, P. R., Lievens, F., Van Iddekinge, C. H., & Kuncel, N. R. (2017). Individual differences and their measurement: A review of 100 years of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 254-273.
Speer, A. B., Christiansen, N. D., Laginess, A. J. (2019). Social intelligence and interview accuracy: Individual differences in the ability to construct interviews and rate accurately. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 27(2), 104-128.
Straus, S. G., Miles, J. A., & Levesque, L. L. (2001). The effects of videoconference, telephone, and face-to-face media on interviewer and applicant judgments in employment interviews. Journal of Management, 27, 363-381.
Suen, H. Y., Chen, Y-C., & Lu, S. H. (2019). Does the use of synchrony and artificial intelligence in video interviews affect interview ratings and applicant attitudes? Computers in Human Behavior, 98, 93-101.
Suen, H. Y., Hung, K. E., & Lin, C. L. (2019). Tensor flow-based automatic personality recognition used in asynchronous video interviews. IEEE Access. 7, 61018-61023.
Sullivan, P., Gagnon, M., Gammage, K., & Peters, S. (2015). Is the effect of behavioral synchrony on cooperative behavior mediated by pain threshold? J. Soc. Psychol. 155(6), 650-660.
Sullivan, P. J., Rickers, K., & Gammage, K. L. (2014). The effect of different phases of synchrony on pain threshold. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 18(2), 122-128.
Swider, B. W., Barrick, M. R., & Harris, T. B. (2016). Initial impressions: What they are, what they are not, and how they influence structured interview outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(5), 625-638.
Torres, E. N. & Gregory, A. (2018). Hiring manager’s evaluations of asynchronous video interviews: The role of candidate competencies, aesthetics, and resume placement. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 75, 86-93.
Torres, E. N., & Mejia, C. (2017). Asynchronous video interviews in the hospitality industry: Considerations for virtual employee selection. International Journal of Hospitality Management., 61, 4-13.
Trevino, L. K., Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1990). Understanding managers' media choices: A symbolic interactionist perspective. Organizations and Communication Technology, 71-94.
Walther, J. B. (2011). Theories of computer-mediated communication and interpersonal relations. In M. L. Knapp, & J. A. Daly (Eds.). The handbook of interpersonal communication, 443-479.
Willis, J., & Todorov, A. (2006). First impressions: Making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17(7), 592-598.