許多人將抽菸視為一個不好的生活習慣，但在勞力付出型的產業中，抽菸仍然是工作場所常見的習慣，餐飲業也是其中一個。當部屬跟主管都有抽菸習慣的時候，他們就會在休息的抽菸場所當中巧遇並進行聊天互動，部屬會去觀察主管目前的角色去作出適當的反應。本研究採用半結構式訪談法進行質性研究，深入研究部屬跟主管在這段抽菸時間的聊天互動，統整16位與主管有抽菸經驗的部屬，並歸納出兩點：一種是主管進入到抽菸場所不會進行角色轉換，聊天的話題跟工作相關，幫助部屬更加了解主管的做事方式、公司狀態跟政策執行；另一種是主管進入到抽菸場所進行角色轉換，聊天的話題為主管自省、工作經驗分享以及生活趣事三種，幫助部屬熟悉主管的脾氣、增進主管跟部屬之間的關係、部屬更加願意為工作付出、以及部屬可以學習工作上的小訣竅和部屬個人的職涯發展。最後針對研究結果進行討論，並提出實務意涵以及未來研究方向。

Many people regard smoking as a bad habit. However, in labor-intensive industries, smoking is not uncommon phenomenon in the workplace. The catering industry is one of them. When both subordinates and supervisors smoke, they would be highly likely to meet and interact in the smoking area during breaks. The subordinates will observe the supervisor's role and make appropriate responses. This research was qualitative research and used a semi-structured interview method. I analyzed the chat and interaction between subordinates and supervisors during the smoking time. Collected 16 subordinates who have smoking experience with their supervisors. The results are twofold. On the one hand, the supervisor may enter a smoking place with their work roles. In this case, most of the chat topics are related to work, which can help subordinates to better understand the supervisor's way of doing things, the current state of the company, and the implementation of policies; on the other hand, the supervisor may enter the smoking place with their nonwork roles. The chat topics are the supervisor's self-reflection, work experience sharing, and life anecdotes. These topics can help subordinates to familiarize themselves with the supervisor's temper, improve the relationship between the supervisor and the subordinate, the subordinate is more willing to dedicate to the work, and the subordinate can learn the skills of work, and help career development of subordinate individuals. Finally, the research results are discussed, and practical implications and future research directions are proposed.

一、中文部分
吳宗祐、周麗芳、鄭伯壎（2008）。主管的權威取向及其對部屬順從與畏懼的知覺對威權領導的預測效果。本土心理學研究，30，65-115。
吳宗祐、廖紘億（2013）。華人威權領導總是導致部屬負面結果嗎？由「不確定管理理論」探討威權領導對分配不公平與程序不公平之交互作用與部屬工作滿意度之關係的調節效果。中華心理學刊，55(1)，1-22。
李慶芳（2009）。我對質性研究的反思：兩個三角形與兩個問題。組織與管理，2(2)，21-27。
周婉茹、鄭伯壎、連玉輝（2014）。威權領導：概念源起、現況檢討及未來方向。中華心理學刊，56(2)，165-189。
范麗娟（1994）。深度訪談簡介。戶外遊憩研究，7(2)，25-35。
高鳯霞、鄭伯壎（2019）。華人組織中的人際壓力源：主位與客位構念之比較。中華心理學刊，61(2)，73-95。
張思嘉（2001）。婚姻早期的適應過程：新婚夫妻之質性研究。本土心理學研究，16，91-133。
許境頤、簡心潔（2015）。部屬印象整飭策略對威權領導與知覺部屬順從的關聯性之中介效果：併論動機內化的調節角色。組織與管理，8(2)，73-114。
陳曉萍、鄭伯壎、沈偉、黃敏萍（2019）。組織與管理研究的實證方法，三版。臺北：華泰
彭玉樹、梁奕忠、于卓民、梁晉嘉（2010）。台灣管理學門質性研究之回顧與展望。中山管理評論，18(1)，11-39。
黃嵩立、黃怡碧（2012）。吸菸、自由與社會正義。台灣人權學刊，1(2)，45-57。
楊國樞（1993）。中國人的社會取向：社會互動的觀點。臺北：桂冠。
樊景立、鄭伯壎（2000）。華人組織的家長式領導：一項文化觀點的分析。本土心理學研究，13，126-180。
鄭伯壎、周麗芳、樊景立（2000）。家長式領導：三元模式的建構與測量。本土心理學研究，14，3-64。
簡晉龍、黃囇莉（2015）。華人權威取向之內涵與形成歷程。本土心理學研究，43，55-123。
二、外文部分
Ahrentzen, S. B. (1990). Managing conflict by managing boundaries: How professional homeworkers cope with multiple roles at home. Environment and Behavior, 22(6), 723-752.
Ashforth, B. E., & Fried, Y. (1988). The mindlessness of organizational behaviors. Human Relations, 41(4), 305-329.
Ashforth, B. E., Kreiner, G. E., & Fugate, M. (2000). All in a day's work: Boundaries and micro role transitions. Academy of Management Review, 25(3), 472-491.
Biddle, B. J. (1979). Role theory: expectations, identities, and behaviors. Academic Press.
Burr, W. R. (1972). Role transitions: A reformulation of theory. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 407-416.
Delong, T. J., & Delong, C. C. (1992). Managers as fathers: Hope on the homefront. Human Resource Management, 31(3), 171-181.
Dickens, K. N., Ebrahim, C. H., & Herlihy, B. (2016). Counselor education doctoral students' experiences with multiple roles and relationships. Counselor Education and Supervision, 55(4), 234-249.
Dierdorff, E. C., Rubin, R. S., & Bachrach, D. G. (2012). Role expectations as antecedents of citizenship and the moderating effects of work context. Journal of Management, 38(2), 573-598.
Holmes, J. (2005). Story-telling at work: A complex discursive resource for integrating personal, professional and social identities. Discourse Studies, 7(6), 671-700.
Katainen, A. (2012). Smoking and workers’ autonomy: A qualitative study on smoking practices in manual work. Health, 16(2), 134-150.
Kirchmeyer, C. (1995). Managing the work-nonwork boundary: An assessment of organizational responses. Human Relations, 48(5), 515-536.
Laurier, E., McKie, L., & Goodwin, N. (2000). Daily and lifecourse contexts of smoking. Sociology of Health & Illness, 22(3), 289-309.
MacNaughton, K., Chreim, S., & Bourgeault, I. L. (2013). Role construction and boundaries in interprofessional primary health care teams: a qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research, 13(1), 1-13.
Michael B. Berg and Linda Lin(2019).Occasionally stigmatized: how the frequency and context of use influence perceptions of intermittent smokers. Addiction Research & Theory, 27 ,249-257
Olson-Buchanan, J. B., & Boswell, W. R. (2006). Blurring boundaries: Correlates of integration and segmentation between work and nonwork. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(3), 432-445.
Reitzes, D. C., & Mutran, E. J. (1994). Multiple roles and identities: Factors influencing self-esteem among middle-aged working men and women. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57(4), 313.
Shumate, M., & Fulk, J. (2004). Boundaries and role conflict when work and family are colocated: A communication network and symbolic interaction approach. Human Relations, 57(1), 55-74.
Sieber, S. D. (1974). Toward a theory of role accumulation. American Sociological Review, 39(4), 567-578.
Söderlund, J., & Borg, E. (2018). Liminality in management and organization studies: Process, position and place. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(4), 880-902.
Thoits, P. A. (1983). Multiple identities and psychological well-being: A reformulation and test of the social isolation hypothesis. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 174-187.