簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳韻如
論文名稱: 品牌聯盟深度、品牌知名度、產品特性對消費者知覺品質的影響-以電視購物為例
指導教授: 王仕茹
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 大眾傳播研究所
Graduate Institute of Mass Communication
論文出版年: 2006
畢業學年度: 94
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 77
中文關鍵詞: 品牌聯盟深度品牌知名度知覺品質產品特性電視購物
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:186下載:17
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 中文摘要

      本研究以交易成本理論來觀察電視購物與製造商的品牌聯盟關係下,消費者對於聯盟後知覺品質的感知。由於聯盟關係愈深,電視購物頻道與製造商所需投入的專屬性資產也愈多,專屬性資產無法在合作失敗後輕易的被移轉成其他的用途,因此便成為交易中的抵押品,能夠成為有效的品質保證訊號。從過去品牌聯盟的理論發現,品牌所以標示品質是源自於品牌過去的資本投入及可能遭受損失的風險程度,也就是過去的投資及未來的獲利成為交易關係中的抵押,高知名度品牌容易因品質不良而遭到消費者的處罰。因此本研究預設製造商品牌知名度及電視購物品牌知名度會成為干擾,換句話說,品牌知名度會影響品牌聯盟關係深淺所造成的效果。

      而在產品特性上,由於過去的研究發現,消費者在不同的產品特性的情況下推論產品品質的依據並不相同,於經驗性產品時消費者更會依賴外部所提供的線索來判斷品質,此時品牌聯盟關係深淺程度便成為一個重要的訊號線索,因此本研究將產品特性也列為實驗中的干擾變項,來探討其與聯盟關係深淺的交互作用。

      本研究利用實驗法來對於研究假設做驗證,聯盟關係深淺對於聯盟後知覺品質的影響。應變項為知覺品質,自變項為聯盟關係深淺,干擾變項有三,分別為製造商品牌知名度、電視購物品牌知名度及產品特性。

      從本研究的實驗結果可以得知,在主效果部份聯盟關係的深淺確實可以影響消費者的聯盟後知覺品質。由於合作的關係愈深,雙方為合作關係所投入的成本也就愈多,一旦消費者認知到兩合作品牌有專屬性資產的投入,合作的失敗會造成雙方面的損失時,消費者便願意相信兩品牌所做的產品品質宣稱。

    在干擾效果上面卻發現聯盟關係深淺對於知覺品質的影響並不會受到製造商品牌知名度、電視購物品牌知名度及產品特性的干擾。(1)整體來說高知名度製造商品牌的情況下,受測者的聯盟後知覺品質較好。然而製造商品牌並不會加深或減弱聯盟關係深淺對於消費者知覺品質的影響。(2)電視購物品牌對於聯盟後知覺品質並不具影響效果,也就是消費者不會因為電視購物品牌高低而影響其對於聯盟產品知覺品質的評價。消費者的知覺品質只會因為聯盟關係的深淺而有所變化,並不會受到電視購物品牌知名度所影響。(3)在產品特性上面,過去的理論認為在經驗性產品的消費上,由於消費者缺乏可以評估產品品質的標準,因而消費者會更依賴聯盟品牌所提供的訊號來做產品品質的評估,然而在本實驗上卻發現,電視購物與製造商的聯盟之後的知覺品質,並不會因為產品特性而有所不同。無論於搜尋性產品或經驗性產品,只要聯盟關係加深,消費者感知到合作雙方專屬性資產的投入後,聯盟後的知覺品質就會比較好。

    Abstract

    The study will discuss consumers’ perceived quality to product after brand alliance by observing the relationship of brand alliance between TV shopping channels and manufacturers in accordance with Transaction Costs Theory. The higher the alliance relationship is, the more specific assets are necessary for TV shopping channels and manufacturers to spend. Specific assets, if cooperation fails, cannot be turned for other use, thus becoming the hostage of transactions, unable to serve as effective quality assurance signals. From past studies of brand alliances, a brand signifies the quality because of its invested capital and the degree of risk in the past; namely, giving hostage the past investments and future profits for transactions. Prestigious brands are less likely to invoke fines and punishment from consumers because of poor quality. Therefore, the study is conducted based upon the presumption that the prestige of manufacturer brands and TV shopping channel brands would be an intervening factor. In other words, brand prestige would have an impact upon the effect caused by the degree of brand alliances.

    In terms of product attributes, past studies found that consumers valuing product qualities based on different criteria when encountering different product attributes. For experience goods, consumers would rely more on external information to judge the quality of a product. Under such circumstances, the degree of brand alliance becomes a critical clue of signals. For this reason, the study adopts product attributes as an intervening variable in the interactions of brand alliance.

    The study employs experiment method to examine the influence of brand alliance upon consumers’ perceived quality to products after brand alliance. In the study, the dependant variable is perceived quality; independent variable is the degree of brand alliance; and the intervening variable are the prestige of a manufacturer brand, the prestige of a TV shopping channel brand, as well as the product attribute of a TV shopping channel brand.

    From the experiment has shown that, in terms of major effects, the degree of brand alliance does have impact upon the perceived quality after brand alliance. The higher degree of cooperation, the more investments both sides instill. Once consumers find that an allied brand has investment of specific assets from both sides, and the failure of cooperation would mean a loss to both sides, they would believe the product quality announcement of the allied brands.

    In terms of intervening effects, however, the study fond that the degree of brand alliance would not be influenced by the prestige of manufacturer brand, the prestige of TV shopping channel, and the product attribute of TV shopping channel. (1) In all, testees hold better perceived quality to product after brand alliance to prestigious manufacturer brands. On the other hand, manufacturer brands would not strengthen nor weaken the influence of the degree of brand alliance upon consumers’ perceived quality to product. (2) TV shopping channel brand has no influence upon perceived quality towards manufacturer brand. Namely, consumers' perceived quality to manufacturer brand product will not be affected by the brand of TV channel. (3) In terms of product attribute, past theories found that on the consumption of experience goods, due to the lack of criteria in evaluating product quality, consumers rely more on the signals provided by brand alliance. However, the experiment found that the perceived quality to product after the brand alliance between TV shopping channel and manufacturer would not be different because of product attributes. Search prduct or experience product, as long as the brand alliance is enhanced, and consumers find the investment of specific assets from both sides, they would harbor better perceived quality toward product after brand alliance.

    目   錄 第一章 緒 論 1 第一節 研究動機 1 第二節 研究目的 4 第二章 文獻探討 5 第一節 電視購物的發展 6 一、電視購物 6 二、台灣電視購物的發展概況 7 第二節 品牌聯盟對於消費者知覺品質的影響 8 一、品牌做為品質的訊號 8 二、品牌聯盟 11 三、零售通路對於消費者知覺品質的影響 15 四、品牌聯盟對於消費者知覺品質的影響 16 五、策略聯盟之類型 17 第三節 探討專屬資產成為抵押品 19 一、代理理論的基本假設 20 二、代理問題 20 三、交易成本理論 22 四、對於承諾的投入程度成為抵押品 25 第四節 不同知名度品牌的承諾效果 28 第五節 探討產品的可觀察程度與消費者對於訊號的需求 29 第三章 研究方法 33 第一節 研究架構 33 第二節 實驗設計 37 一、前測 37 二、正式實驗 39 三、研究對象與抽樣方法 48 第四章 結果分析與討論 49 第一節 樣本結構 49 第二節 操弄檢定 51 一、聯盟關係的深淺 51 二、製造商品牌知名度 52 三、電視購物品牌知名度 54 四、產品特性 56 第三節 共變量檢定 58 一、產品知識 58 二、 涉入度 59 三、資訊滿意度 63 第四節 假說檢定 66 小結: 73 第五章 結論與建議 74 第一節 研究結論 74 一、聯盟關係深度對於知覺品質的影響 74 二、製造商品牌知名度對知覺品質的影響 74 三、電視購物品牌知名度對聯盟後知覺品質的影響 75 四、產品特性對聯盟後知覺品質的影響 75 第二節 學術及實務意涵 75 一、學術意涵 75 二、實務意涵 76 第三節 研究限制及後續研究建議 76 參考文獻 78 英文部分: 78 中文部分: 84 網站資料: 84 圖表目錄 表2-1 台灣電視購物發展延革 7 表3-1 假說整理 36 表3-2 產品特性平均值 37 表3-3 手錶與印表機的成對樣本t檢定結果 38 表3-4 購物頻道品牌知名度結果分析 38 表3-5 印表機與手錶的品牌知名度結果分析 38 表3-6 聯盟關係深度平均數與標準差 39 表3-7 聯盟關係深度t檢定結果 39 表3-7 變項的定義與衡量 45 表3-8 變項的表格整理(續) 46 表3-9 實驗設計組合 47 表4-1 樣本性別比例表 49 表4-2 樣本各年級分佈比例表 49 表4-3 受測者平均月花費比例表 49 表4-4 受測者電視購物購買經驗分析表 50 表4-5 受測者印表機購買經驗分析表 50 表4-6 受測者手錶購買經驗分析表 50 表4-7 聯盟關係深度之樣本平均數與標準差 51 表4-8 聯盟關係深度操弄t檢定 51 表4-9 製造商品牌知名度平均數與標準差 52 表4-10 製造商品牌知名度操弄t檢定 52 表4-11 高低知名度手錶品牌態度平均數及標準差 53 表4-12 高低知名度手錶品牌態度t檢定 53 表4-13 高低知名度印表機品牌態度平均數及標準差 53 表4-14 高低知名度印表機品牌態度t檢定 54 表4-15 電視購物品牌知名度平均數與標準差 54 表4-16 電視購物品牌知名度操弄t檢定 55 表4-17 高低知名度電視購物品牌態度平均數與標準差 55 表4-18 高低知名度電視購物品牌態度t檢定 55 表4-19 產品特性量表共同性檢定 56 表4-20 產品特性量表總變異量 57 表4-21 產品特性量表成份矩陣表 57 表4-22 產品特性之樣本平均數與標準差 57 表4-23 產品特性操弄t檢定 57 表4-24 各版本產品知識樣本平數均數與標準差 58 表4-25 產品知識變異數分析表 59 表4-26 各版本涉入度樣本平數均數與標準差 59 表4-27 各版本涉入度變異數分析 60 表4-28 聯盟關係深度的分類下涉入度變異數分析 60 表4-29 以製造商品牌知名度分類的涉入度變異數分析表 61 表4-30 以電視購物品牌知名度分類的涉入度變異數分析 61 表4-31 以產品特性分類的涉入度變異數分析表 62 表4-32 以產品特性做分類時涉入度的平均數及標準差 62 表4-33 各版本資訊滿意度樣本平數均數與標準差 63 表4-34 各版本的資訊滿意度均數變異數分析表 63 表4-35 聯盟關係深度分類下資訊滿意度的變異數分析 64 表4-36 聯盟關係深度分類下的資訊滿意度平均數與標準差 64 表4-37 以製造商品牌知名度分類的資訊滿意度的變異數分析表 65 表4-38 製造商品牌知名度分類下的資訊滿意平均數 65 表4-39 以電視購物品牌知名度高低分類的資訊滿意度變異數分析 65 表4-40 以產品特性分類的資訊滿意度變異數分析表 66 表4-41 各變項的主效果變異數分析 67 表4-42 聯盟關係深度下知覺品質平均數與標準差 67 表4-43 聯盟關係深度與製造商品牌知名度組合下的知覺品質樣本平均數與標準差 68 表4-44 聯盟關係深度與製造商品牌知名度組合下的知覺品質變異數分析 68 表4-45 聯盟關係深度與高低知名度電視購物品牌組合下知覺品質樣本平均數與標準差 70 表4-46 聯盟關係深度與高低知名度電視購物品牌組合下的知覺品質變異數分析 70 表4-47 聯盟關係深度與產品特性組合下的知覺品質樣本平均數與標準差 71 表4-48 聯盟關係深度與產品特性組合下的知覺品質變異數分析 72 表4-49 總體樣本下假說檢定表 73 圖2-1 品牌聯盟形式之連續帶 13 圖2-2 評估品牌值的分析架構圖 13 圖2-3 品牌名稱、商店名稱及商品價格對於商品評估之影響模式 15 圖2-4 組織失靈架構 24 圖3-1 實驗設計之架構圖 36     圖3-2 購物頻道品牌知名度長條圖…………………………………38 圖4-1 聯盟關係深度與高低知名度製造商品牌組合下的知覺品質平均數圖 69 圖4-2 聯盟關係深度與電視購物品牌知名度組合下知覺品質樣本平均數關係圖 71 圖4-3 聯盟關係深度與產品特性組合下的知覺品質樣本平均數關係圖 72

    參考文獻
    英文部分:
    Aaker, D. A. and Keller, K. L. (1990), “Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 54(1), pp.27-41.
    Akerlof, G. A. (1970), “The Market for ‘Lemons’: Quality Uncertainty and The Market Mechanism,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 84(3), pp.488-500.
    Anderson, E. and Weitz B. (1992), “The Use of Pledges to Build and Sustain Commitment in Distribution Channels,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 29(1), pp.18-34.
    Barney, J. B., and Ouchi, W. G. (1986), “Organizational Economics,” San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
    Bergen, M., Dutta, S, and Walker, O. C. Jr.. (1992), “Agency Relationships in Marketing: A Review of The Implications and Applications of Agency and Related Theories,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 56(3), pp.1-24.
    Bettman, J. R. and Sujan, M. (1987), “Effects of Framing on Evaluation of Comparable and Noncomparable Alternatives by Expert and Novice Consumers,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 14(2), pp.141-154.
    Borys, B. and Jamison, D. B. (1989), “Hybrid Arrangements as Strategic Alliances: Theoretical Issues in Organizational Combinations,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14(2), pp.234-249.
    Boxerson, D. J. and Cooper, M.B. (1992), Strategic Marketing Channel Management, Mcgraw-Hill International edition.
    Braverman, B. (2005), “QVC Sells Dirty Rotten Jewelry,” New York, Vol. 99(11), p.38.
    Brown, J. R, Dev, C. S., and Lee, D. J. (2000), “Managing Marketing Channel Opportunism: The Efficacy of Alternative Governance Mechanisms,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 64(2), pp.51-65.
    Bucklin, L. P. and Sengupta, S. (1993) “Organizing Successful Co-Marketing Alliances.” Journal of Marketing Vol.57, pp.32-46.
    Chu, W. and Chu W. (1994), “Signaling Quality by Selling Through a Reputable Retailer: An Example of Renting The Reputation of Another Agent,” Marketing Science, Vol. 13(2), pp.177-189.
    Cooke, S. and Ryan, P. (2000), “Brand Alliance: Form Reputation Endorsement to Collaboration on Core Competencies.” Irish Marketing Review, Vol. 13(2), pp.36-41.
    Crosby, L. A. and Stephens, N. (1987), “Effects of relationship marketing on satisfaction, retention, and prices in the life insurance industry,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 24, pp.404-411.
    Dahlman, C. J. (1979), “The Problem of Externality,” Journal of Low & Economics, Vol. 22(1), pp.141-162.
    Dodds, W. B., Kent, B. M., and Dhruv G. (1991), “Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers’ Product Evaluations,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 28(3), pp.301-319.
    Dutta, Shantanu, Bergen Mark, and John George (1994), “The Governance of Exclusive Territories When Dealers Can Bootleg,” Marketing Science, Vol. 13(1), pp.83-99.
    Dwyer, F. Robert, Schurr Paul H., and Oh Sejo (1987), “Developing Buyer-Seller Relationships,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 51(2), pp.11-27.
    Engel, J. F., Miniard P. W., and Blackwell R. D. (1993), Consumer Behavior, 7th edition, New York: The Dryden Press.
    Erdem, T. and Swait, J. (1998), “Brand Equity as a Signaling Phenomenon, Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 7(2), pp.131-157.
    Erdem, T. and Swait, J. (2004), “Brand Credibility, Brand Consideration, and Choice,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 31(1), pp.191-198.
    Erdem, T. and Swait, J., and Valenzuela, A. (2006), “Brands as Signals: A Cross-Country Validation Study,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 70(1), pp.34-49.
    Ettenson, R. and Gaeth G. (1991), “Consumer Perceptions of Hybrid (Bi-National) Brands,” Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 8(4), pp.13-18.
    Fudenberg, D., Kreps D. M., and Maskin E. S. (1990), “Repeated Games with Long-Run and Short-Run Players,” Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 57(192), pp.555-573.
    Gaeth, G. J., Levin, I. P., Chakraborty, G., and Levin, A. M. (1991), “Consumer Evaluation of Multi-Product Bundles: An Information Integration Analysis,” Marketing Letters, Vol. 2(1), pp.47-57.
    Garvin, D. A. (1984), “What Does ‘Product Quality’ Really Mean?” Sloan Management Review, Vol. 26(1), pp.25-43.
    Goldsmith, R. E. and Emmert, J. (1991), “Measuring Product Category Involvement: A Multitrait-Multimethod Study”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 23(4), pp.363-371.
    Griffith, D. A. and Harvey, M. G. (2001), “A Resource Perspective of Global Dynamic Capabilities,” Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 32(3), pp.597-606.
    Heide, J. B. and John, G. (1988), “The Role of Dependence Balancing in Safeguarding Transaction-Specific Assets in Conventional Channels,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 52(1), pp.20-35.
    Hillyer, C. and Tikoo, S. (1995), “Effect of Cobranding on Consumer Product Evaluations,” Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 22(1), pp.123-127.
    Jacoby, J. and Mazursky, D. (1984) “Linking Brand and Retailer Image: Do The Potential Risks Outweigh The Potential Benefits?” Journal of Retailing, Vol. 60(2), pp.105-122.
    James, B. G. (1985), “Alliance: The New Strategic Focus,” Long Range Planning, Vol. 18(3), pp.76-81.
    Janiszewski, C., Stijn, M. J., and Van, O. (2000), ”A Connectionist Model of Brand-Quality Associations,” Journal of Marketing Research , Vol. 37(3), pp.331-350.
    Jap, S. D. and Anderson, E. (2003), “Safeguarding Interorganizational Performance and Continuity Under Ex Post Opportunism,”Management Science. Vol. 49(12), pp1684-1701.
    Jones, M. A.and Suh, J. (2000), “Transaction-specific satisfaction and overall satisfaction: an empirical analysis,” The Journal of Services Marketing. Vol. 14(2), pp. 147-159.
    Keller, Kevin Lane and Aaker, D. A. (1992), “The Effects of Sequential Introduction of Brand Extensions,” Journal of Marketing Research , Vol. 29(1), pp.35-50.
    Killing, P. J. (1982), “How to Make a Global Joint Venture Work,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 60(3), pp.120-127.
    Killing, P. J. (1993), “European Strategic Alliances: Co-Operative Corporate Strategies in The New Europe,” Vol. 24(4), pp.814-815.
    King, M. F. and Balasubramanian, S. K. (1994), “The Effects of Expertise, End Goal, and Product Type on Adoption of Preference Formation Strategy,” Journal of The Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 22(2), pp.146-159.
    Kirmani, A. and Rao, A. R. (2000), “No Pain, No Gain: A Critical Review of The Literature on Signaling Unobservable Product Quality,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 64(2), pp.66-79.
    Kirmani, A. and Wright, P. (1989), “Money Talks: Perceived Advertising Expense And Expected Product Quality,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 16(3), pp.344-353.
    Klein, B. and Leffler, K. B. (1981), “The Role of Market Forces in Assuring Contractual Performance,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 89(4), pp.615-641.
    Koku, P. S. (1995), “Price Signaling: Does It Ever Work?” Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 12(1), pp.45-49.
    Kotler, P. (2000), “Marketing Management,” Marketing in The Twenty-First Century, pp.11-20.
    Lorange, P. and Roos, J. (1992), “Strategic Alliances: Formation, Implementation, and Evolution,” Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    Lorange, P., Roos, J., and Bronn, P. S. (1992), “Building Successful Strategic Alliances,” Long Range Planning, Vol. 25(6), pp.10-17.
    Mazursky, D. and Jacoby, J. (1986), “Exploring the Development of Store Image,” Journal of Retailing, Vol. 62(2), pp.145-165.
    Mishra, D. P., Heide, J. B., and Cort, S. G. (1998), “Information Asymmetry and Levels of Agency Relationships,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 35(3), pp.277-295.
    Myers, J. H. and Allan, D. S. (1985), “The Nature of Product-Related Attributes,” Research in Marketing, 5, pp.211-236.
    Nelson, P. J. (1974), “Advertising as Information,” Journal of Political Economy, 82(4), pp.729-754.
    Nevin, J. R. and Houston, M. J. (1980), “Image as a Component of Attraction to Intrauban Shopping Areas,” Journal of Retailing, Vol. 56(1), pp.77-93.
    Olshavsky, R. W. (1985), “Towards a More Comprehensive Theory of Choice,” Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 12(1), pp.465-470.
    Ozanne, J. L., Brucks, M., and Grewal, D. (1992), “A Study of Information Search Behavior During the Categorization of New Products," Journal of Consumer Research, 18, pp.452-463.
    Park, C. H. and Kim, Y. G. (2006), “The Effect of Information Satisfaction and Relational Benefit on Consumers' Online Shopping Site Commitments,” Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, Vol. 4(1), pp.70-90.
    Park, C. W., Jun, S. Y., and Shocker, A. D.(1996), “Composite Branding Alliances: An Investigation of Extension and Feedback Effects,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 33(4), pp.453-466.
    Park, C. W. and Lessig, V. P. (1981) “Familiarity and Its Impact on Consumer Decision Biases and Heuristics,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 8(2), pp.223-230.
    Petty, R. P., Unnava, R., and Strathman, A. J.(1991),Theories of Attitude Change. In Handbook of Consumer Behavior), Thomas S. Robert and Harold H.Kassarjian, eds. NJ: Prentice-Hall, pp.241-280.
    Porter M. E. and Fuller , M. B.(1987), "Coalitions and Global Strategy", In Competition in Global Industries, Edited by Porter, M.E., Harvard University Press, pp.315-343.
    Rao, A. R. and Ruekert, R. W. (1994), “Brand Alliances as Signals of Product Quality,” Sloan Management Review, Vol. 36(1), pp.87-97.
    Rao, A. R., Qu, L. ,and Ruekert, R. W. (1999), “Signaling Unobservable Product Quality Through a Brand Ally,” Journal of Marketing Research , Vol. 36(2), pp.258-268.
    Riordan, M. H. and Williamson, O. E. (1985), “Asset Specificity and Economic Organization,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 3(4), pp.365-378.
    Rodrigue, C. S. and Biswas, A. (2004), “Brand alliance dependency and exclusivity: an empirical investigation,” The Journal of Product and Brand Management. Santa Barbara, Vol. 13(7), pp.477-487.
    Schelling, T. C. (1960), “The Strategy of Conflict,” Athens: Harvard University Press.
    Shocker, A. D., Srivastava, R. K.,and Ruekert, R. W. (1994), “Challenges and Opportunities Facing Brand Management: An Introduction to The Special Issue,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 31(2), pp.149-158
    Simonin, B. L. and Ruth, J. A. (1998), “Is a Company Known by The Company It Keeps? Assessing The Spillover Effects of Brand Alliances on Consumer Brand Attitudes,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 35(1), pp.30-42.
    Smith, D. C. and Park, C. W. (1992), “The Effects of Brand Extensions on Market Share and Advertising Efficiency,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 19(2), pp.296-313.
    Spence, H. E., Engel, J. F., and Blackwell, R. D. (1970), “Perceived Risk in Mail-Order and Retail Store Buying,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 7(3), pp.364-369.
    Spence, M. (1973), “Job Market Signaling,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 87(3), pp.355-374.
    Srivastava, R. K., Leone, R. P., and Shocker, A. D. (1981), “Market Structure Analysis: Hierarchical Clustering of Products Based on Substitution-In-Use,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 45(3), pp.38-48.
    Steenkamp, Jan-Benedict E. M. (1990), “Conceptual Model of the Quality Perception Process,” Journal of Business Research, Vol. 21(4), pp.309-333.
    Swait, J., Erdem, T., Louviere, J., and Dubelaar, C. (1993), “The Equalization Price: A Measure of Consumer-Perceived Brand Equity,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 10(1), pp.23-45.
    Telser, L. G. (1980), “A Theory of Self-Enforcing Agreements,” Journal of Business, Vol. 53(1), pp.27-44.
    Washburn, J. H., Till, B. D., and Priluck, R. (2000), “Co-Branding:Brand Equity and Trial Effects,” Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 17(7), pp.591-604.
    Wernerfelt, B. (1992), “Umbrella Branding as a Signal of New Product Quality: An Example of Signaling by Posting a Bond,” Journal of Economics, Vol. 19(3), pp.458-466.
    Williamson, O. E. (1985), “Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications,” New York: Free Press, pp.321-333.
    Williamson, O. E. (1991), “Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 36(2), pp.269-296.
    Zaichkowsky, J. L.(1985), “Measuring the Involvement Construct,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.12(3), pp.341-352.
    Zeithaml, V. A. (1988), “Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 52(3), pp.2-21.
    中文部分:
    吕芳洲(1998)。《品牌聯盟對品牌權益影響之研究》。雲林科技大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    吳青松(1990)。〈國際策略聯盟與經營績效評估-美國電腦製造業實例〉。《1990年產業科技研究發展管理論文集》,頁1-22。
    吳翠萍(1994)。〈從消費購物頻道看有線電視系統經營者與頻道經營者之間的關係〉,《第一屆傳播生態研討會論文集》。
    殷仲華(1997)。《品牌聯盟動機、聯盟型態與品牌權益關係之研究─資源基礎觀點之研究》。中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    高啟震(1996)。《品牌聯盟的品質訊號傳遞效果之研究》。大同工學院事業經營學研究所碩士論文。
    陳怡伶(2003)。《電視購物頻道與製造商品牌聯盟對知覺品質之影響》。國立台灣師範大學大眾傳播研究所碩士論文。
    黃志明(1992)。《我國國際策略聯盟盟友選擇準則之研究》。國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    虞積祥(2004)。《品牌形象、品牌權益、顧客終身價值關聯性研究-以東森電視購物頻道為例》。義守大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
    鄒淑霞(2005)。《電視購物頻道評選節目主持人之研究》。銘傳大學傳播管理研究所碩士論文。
    網站資料:
    QVC網站(2006年4月25日)。《QVC》。取自
    http://www.qvc.com/asp/frameset.asp?nest=/mainhqwel.html?cp=index&cont=sn
    杜鳴凱(2004)。〈信息不對稱與股份制壽險公司的多重代理問題〉。取自
      http://www.lwlm.com/show.aspx?id=2724&cid=17
    美國行銷協會網站(AMA):http://www.marketingpower.com
    蕃薯藤網站(2006年4月25日)。〈1個半月vs.1個小時!? 電視購物真會賣〉。《ET Today》。取自http://news.yam.com/ettoday/computer/200506/20050623411496.html
    蔡燿駿(2005)。〈你今天又Shopping了嗎?〉。《e天下》,51:http://www.techvantage.com.tw/content/051/051083.asp
    謝柏宏(2002)。〈一分鐘賣出一.五輛車的超級收銀機〉。《商業周刊》,760:http://www.businessweekly.com.tw/article.php?id=14574

    QR CODE