研究生: |
何偉南 Ho, Wei-Nan |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
我國高等回流教育成人學生校園經驗與學習成效關係之研究-以案例大學進修部為例 A Study of Relationship Between Campus Experience and Learning Effectiveness Among Adult Students of Recurrent Education in Higher Education-A Case Study of The Division of Continuing Education at One University |
指導教授: |
楊國賜
Yang, Guo-Si |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
社會教育學系 Department of Adult and Continuing Education |
論文出版年: | 2008 |
畢業學年度: | 96 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 156 |
中文關鍵詞: | 回流教育 、成人學生 、校園經驗 、學習成效 |
英文關鍵詞: | Recurrent Education, Adult Student, Campus Experience, Learning Effectiveness |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:168 下載:43 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究旨在探討案例大學進修部成人學生參與高等回流教育的校園經驗與學習成效現況,並瞭解不同的人口背景變項對於校園經驗與學習成效的差異情形,再進一步探究校園經驗對學習成效的關聯性與預測力。
本研究採問卷調查法,以案例大學進修部成人學生為調查對象。以研究者自編之「我國高等回流教育成人學生校園經驗與學習成效之研究」調查問卷為研究工具進行調查。將問卷所得資料編碼,透過描述統計、t檢定、單因子變異數分析、皮爾森積差相關、多元迴歸等統計方法分析,所得結論如后。
一、案例大學進修部成人學生校園經驗以學習目標注重程度最高、校園整體環境感受次之、學習支持系統感受稍差,但均傾向認同。
二、案例大學進修部成人學生學習成效以學習活動的整體滿意度較佳,而學習活動後的行為改變程度次之,但均傾向認同(滿意)。
三、案例大學進修部成人學生整體校園經驗會因性別、年齡、學群、婚姻狀況、家庭支持度的不同而有所差異。
四、案例大學進修部成人學生整體學習成效會因性別、年齡、學制、學群、家庭支持度的不同而有所差異。
五、案例大學進修部成人學生整體校園經驗與整體學習成效呈現高度正相關。
六、案例大學進修部成人學生校園經驗中的學習支持系統感受對於學習成效具有較佳的預測力、學習目標注重程度次之、校園整體環境感受再次之。
根據以上結論,對於教育行政主管機關、案例大學、成人學生及未來研究方向提出建議,期能提供高等回流教育政策發展參考,並提供案例大學改善校園經驗諸般措施、作為,以促進成人學生的學習成效。
The present study aims to investigate the relationship between campus experiences and learning effectiveness among adult students of recurrent education in higher education. We expect to reveal through this study the influence the personal factors may cause in this relationship. Based on the result, we have pursued further study on the predictability of campus experiences to learning effectiveness.
The study subjects are adult students who enroll in the division of continuing education at the studied university. We have designed a questionnaire to obtain the information pertaining to the objective of the present study. The questionnaire contains three parts: campus experiences, learning effectiveness, and personal factors. The data obtained have been analyzed by the descriptive statistics, t test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson correlation and multiple regression. The conclusions are summarized as following:
1. Concerning the campus experiences, the valuing of learning goals receives the highest score; the comprehensive reception of campus environment is placed in the middle, the reception of learning support system receives the lowest score. Generally, the study subjects tend to agree with these three dimensions.
2. Concerning the learning effectiveness, the satisfaction of learning programs receives a higher score while the behavioral change after learning receives a lower score, but the study subjects have the tendency to agree with both of them.
3. The campus experiences among adult students differ significantly by the personal factors of gender, age, collegial group, marital status and family supportability.
4. The learning effectiveness among adult students differs significantly by the personal factors of gender, age, degree system, marital status and family supportability.
5. The Pearson correlation between campus experience and learning effectiveness among adult students performs highly significant positive correlation.
6. The learning effectiveness can be predicted by the dimensions of campus experiences significantly. The reception of learning support system is the most powerful, the valuing of learning goals is placed in the middle, and the comprehensive reception of campus environment is the weakest.
Based on our study, we have proposed some suggestions for government agencies supervising the recurrent education in higher education, for the studied university as well as for the adult students in view of elevating adult students’ learning effectiveness.
壹、中文部分
丁芳敏(2006)。中原大學學生的全人教育目標知覺、校園參與經驗愈學習成果的關聯性研究。中原大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,桃園縣。
王文瑛(1987)。我國空中大學學生學習取向及其相關因素之研究。國立台灣師範大學社會教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
王世璋(1999)。國中補校成人學生中途輟學及其因應策略之研究。國立嘉義師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義。
王宗斌(1999)。訓練方式、電腦自我效能及學習型態對學習績效的影響-網頁設計時地研究。國立中央大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,新竹。
全國法規資料庫(1948)。大學法。2007年9月3日。取自
http://law.moj.gov.tw/Scripts/Query4.asp?B2=%AAu%A1@%A1@%AD%B2&FNAME=H0030001
全國法規資料庫(2002)。終身學習法。2007年5月3日。取自
http://law.moj.gov.tw/Scripts/Query4A.asp?FullDoc=all&Fcode=H0080048
朱作仁(1994)。教育百科辭典。台北:五南圖書。
行政院教育改革審議委員會(1996)。教育改革總諮議報告書。台北市:行政院。
何信助(1985)。我國台灣地區大學教育目標之研究-八所大學師生對大學教育目標的認知與期望之比較分析。政治大學教研所博士論文,未出版,台北。
何寄澎(1996)。大學師生倫理之現況及其反思-以台大為例,載於第四屆通識教育教師研習營;大學之理念。台北:中華民國通識教育協會。
何福田等(1990)。大專院校訓輔體制規劃之研究。台北:教育部訓委會。
吳明烈(1997)。學習社會理論的發展。國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義。
吳玥伶(2006)。大學僑生校園經驗與學習成就之研究。台灣師範大學公民教
育與活動領導學系碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
李建興(1986)。中國社會教育發展史。台北市:三民。
李淑娟(1992)。訓練移轉之研究-經濟部所屬國營事業機構之個案分析。國立政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
周月清(2001)。家庭社會工作。台北:五南。
季西園等(1985)。加強及改進大學校園推廣教育。台北:行政院研考會。
林振春(2005)。社會調查(第三版)。台北市:五南。
林義男(1982)。大學學生教育態度研究:一年級、性別與就讀科系之比較。國立台灣教育學院輔導學報,5,1-15。
林義男(1990)。大學生的學習參與、學習型態與學習成果的關係。國立彰化師範大學輔導學報,13,79-128。
林麗惠(1997)。成人參與在職進修訓練的自評成效及其相關因素之研究-以職訓局所屬職業訓練中心學員為例。國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義。
武文瑛(2006)。我國高等回流教育發展與評鑑指標建構之研究。高雄師範大
學成人教育研究所博士論文,未出版,高雄市。
洪冬桂(1986)。我國大學生適應問題、因應行為、求助偏好及其相關因素之研究。國立台灣大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,台北。
洪蘭(譯)(2000)。Anne, M. & David, J.著。腦內乾坤:男女有別、其來有自(Brain Sex: The Real Difference Between Men & Women)。台北:遠流。
胡夢鯨、鄧進權(2000)。回流教育與終身學習。載於中華民國成人教育協會主編,回流教育。台北市:師大書苑。
張火燦(1997)。策略性人力資源管理。台北:揚智
張雪梅(1999)。大學教育對學生的衝擊-我國大學生校園經驗與學習成果之實証研究。台北市:張老師。
教育部(1988)。第六次全國教育會議實錄。台北市:教育部。
教育部(1994)。第七次全國教育會議實錄。台北市:教育部。
教育部(1996)。中華民國教育統計。台北市:教育部。
教育部(1997a)。中華民國教育統計。台北市:教育部。
教育部(1997b)。推展終身教育,建立學習社會中程計畫。台北市:教育部。
教育部(1998a)。中華民國教育統計。台北市:教育部。
教育部(1998b)。邁向學習社會白皮書。台北市:教育部
教育部(1999)。中華民國教育統計。台北市:教育部。
教育部(2000)。中華民國教育統計。台北市:教育部。
教育部(2001)。中華民國教育統計。台北市:教育部。
教育部(2002a)。中華民國教育統計。台北市:教育部。
教育部(2002b)。大學教育政策白皮書。2007年5月3日。取自
http://history.moe.gov.tw/important.asp?id=37
教育部(2003)。中華民國教育統計。台北市:教育部。
教育部(2004)。中華民國教育統計。台北市:教育部。
教育部(2005)。中華民國教育統計。台北市:教育部。
教育部(2006a)。重要教育統計資訊大綱。2007年5月10日,取自http://140.111.34.69/EDU_WEB/EDU_MGT/STATISTICS/EDU7220001/overview/brief-htm/index.htm?open
教育部(2006b)。中華民國教育統計。台北市:教育部。
梁峻哲(2004)。網路學習支援系統之建構及其學習成效之相關研究。國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義。
陳金定(2001)。諮商技術。台北:心理。
陳沁怡(2005)。如何評估T&D成效-專業化訓練成果評鑑。T&D飛訊,29,1-9。
陳訓祥(1989)。我國專科進修補校成人學生中途退學及其相關因素之探討。高雄:復文。
陳榮彬(2004)。參與職業訓練學員對成人學習原則應用之知覺與訓練成效關係之研究。國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義。
曾淑惠(2002)。教育方案評鑑。台北市:師大書苑。
黃佑安(1992)。學習動機取向、自重感及個人變因與教育訓練自評成效之相關研究-以企業顧問公司學員為例。私立淡江大學管理科學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
黃富順(1989a)。大學成人教育之實施與展望。現代教育,4(3),100-108。
黃富順(1989b)。成人心理與學習。台北:師大書苑。
黃富順等(1993)。我國大學院校推展成人教育可行途徑之研究。台北:台灣師範大學成人教育研究中心。
黃富順(1994)。大學成人教育的意義源起及實施。載於中華民國成人教育協會主編,大學成人教育。台北市:師大書苑。
黃富順(2000)。成人教育導論。台北:五南。
黃富順等(2002)。成人學習。台北:五南。
黃臺生、任可怡(1995)。中央政府機關訓練績效評估之調查分析。空大行政學報,3,227-251。
楊國賜(1994)。我國大學成人教育的政策及發展方向。載於中華民國成人教育協會主編,大學成人教育。台北市:師大書苑。
葉少基(1977)。管理訓練與評估之研究。國立交通大學管理科學研究所碩士論文,未出版,新竹。
劉玲姿(1994)。我國大學成人教育的實施現況。載於中華民國成人教育協會主編,大學成人教育。台北市:師大書苑。
劉若蘭(2006)。學生如何成功的學習?-從大學生對學習成果與學校的滿意度談教育品質的提昇。台灣高教研究電子報。2007年5月15日。取自
http://www.cher.ed.ntnu.edu.tw/epaper/topics/index.php?t_id=7
潘慧琳(2004)。教育論文格式。台北:雙葉。
鄭田(1995)。交通部電信訓練所學員察覺之學習滿意度調查研究。國立交通大學管理科學研究所碩士論文,未出版,新竹。
鄭明韋(1999)。國立空中大學嘉義地區學生學習方式、學習參與程度與學習成效之研究。中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所,未出版,嘉義縣。
鄭麗珍(2002)。家庭社會工作。載於呂寶靜主編,社會工作與台灣社會。台北:巨流。
戴淑媛(2001)。中高齡者職業訓練成效評估之研究。國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄。
鍾思嘉(1993)。大專輔導活動現況研究,載於81年度專案研究論文。台北:教育部。
瞿立鶴(1983)。我國推廣教育之演進與檢討。教育資料集刊,第八輯,1-66。
簡福成(2005)。台電公司在職人員訓練成效評估之研究。國立高雄第一科技大學行銷與流通管理研究所所碩士論文,未出版,高雄。
魏惠娟(1997)。婦女教育中心方案規劃。載於1997性別與兩性研討會論文輯。高雄:高雄醫學院兩性研究中心。
貳、英文部分
ACPA, NASPA (2004).Learning reconsidered: A Campus-wide focus on the student experience. Washington, D. C.: Author.
Apps, J. W. (1981). The adult learner on campus: A guide for instructors and administrators. Chicago: Follett.
Arnold, J., Kuh, G., Vesper, n. & Schuh, J.(1991). The influence of student effort, college environment and selected student characteristics on undergraduate student learning and personal development at metropolitan institutions. Boston: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education.
Astin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement: A development theory for higher education. Journal of college Student Development, 40(5), 518-529.
Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college? San Francisco: Jossey Bass
Baker-Miller, J. (1986). Toword a new paychology of women (2nd ed.) Boston: Beacon.
Banning, J. H. (1978). (Eds.). Capmus ecology: A perspective for student affairs. Portland, Oregen: National Association of Student Personnel Adiministrators.
Barnett, R. (1990). The idea of higher education. London: Open University Press.
Barr, R. B & Tagg, J.(1985). From teaching to learning new paredigm for undergraduate education. Change, Nov/Dec, 13-25.
Belanger, P. & Valdivielso, S. (1997). The emergence of learning societies; Who participates in adult learning.
Bok, D. (1982). Beyond the ivory tower: Social responsibilities of the modern university. Cambridge, Massschusetts: Harvard University Press.
Boshier, R. (1973). Educational participation and dropout: a theoretical model. Adult Education, 23(4), 233-282.
Boshier, R. (1976). Factor analyst at large: A critical review of the motivation orientation literature. Adult Education, 26(1), 24-47.
Brain, S. R. & Ommen, J. L. (1977). Men, women, and learning styles.Community College Frontiers, 5(3), 32-36.
Brinkerhoff, R. O. (1988).A Intergrated Evaluation Model for HRD. Training and Development Journal, 42(2), 66-67.
Brundage & Mackeracher (1980). Adult learning principles and their application to program planning. Ontario Ministry of Education.
Burruss, W. J. (2001). Adult learning environment: The relationship of light and color in the ambient environments. The Journal of Countinuing Higher Education, 49, 28-33.
Cavanaugh, J. C. (1997). Adult development and aging. Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole.
Chickering, A.W. (1969). Education and identity. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Christine, K. G. (1990). Learning preference and motivation among adult returning students to higher education: A comparison to tranditionally-aged students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, East Tennessee University.
Clarke, J. H. (1980). Adult in the college setting: deciding to develop skills. Adult Education ,30(2), 92-100.
Cross, K. P. (1981). Adult as learners: Increasing participation and facilitation learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Davenport, J. (1984). Andragogical-pedagogical orientation and its relationship to age, sex, and academic achievement among selected university of wyoming students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Univisity of Wyoming.
Davis, T. M. & Marrell, P. H. (1993). Turing teaching into learning: The role of student responsibilities in the collegiate experience. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports- Report 8. Washington, D. C.: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.
Dugan, P. A. (1985). Non-traditional and traditional student learning characteristics relating to class size at the university lever. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cornell University.
Grubbs, J. C. (1981). A study of faculty members and students in slected midwestern schools of theology to dertermine whether their education orientation in andragogical or pedragogical. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University.
Harris, D. M. & Desimore, R. L. (1994). Human resource development. New York: Harcourt Brace College.
Hore, T. (1996). Third-age students in higher education. In A.C. Tuijnman(Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Adult Education and Training, 589-897. Pergamon.
Hutchins, R. M. (1979). The higher learning in America. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press, Publishers.
Jarvis, P. (1990). An International Dictionary of Adult and Continuing education. London: Routledge.
Jarvis, P. (1995). Adult and continuing education: Theory and practice. London: Routledge.
Kasworm, C. E. (1996). University Adult Education. In Tuiznman, A C. (Ed.) International Encyclopedia of Adult Education and Training. Oxford: Pergaman
Keable, D. M. (1991). Characteristics of adult learners at the postbaccslaureate level at the university of north Dakota. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Dakota.
Kerwin, M. A. (1980). Development of an instrument to measure the teaching behavior of adult education. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED183743)
Kirkpatrick, D. (1994). Evaluation training programs: The four levels. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1994). Evaluation training programs: The four levels. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Knowles, M. S. (1980). The Modern practice of adult education: From pedagogy to andragogy. Englewood Cliffs: Cambridge Books.
Knowles, M. S. (1990). The adult learner: A neglected species. Houston: Gulf Publishing.
Kraiger, K., Ford, J. K., & Salas, E. (1993). Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluaton. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 323
Kuh, G. D. (1993). In their own words: What students learn outside the classroom. American Education Research Journal, 30(2), 277-307.
Lalande, V. (1995). Student support via audio teleconferencing: Psycho-educational workshops for post-bachelor nursing students. The American Journal of Distance Education, 9(3), 62-73
Levin, H. M. & Schutz, H. G. (Eds.) (1983). Strategies for increasing employment, job opportunities and productivity. California: Beverly Hills.
Linderman, E. C. (1926).The meaning of adult education. New York: New Republc.
Longworth, N. & Davis, W. K. (1996). Lifelong learning. London: Kogan
Moore, M. G. & Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance education: A system view. Belmont: Wadsworth
Morstain, B & Kraft, R. (1979). Educational orientations of college students: A typological analysis. Reseash in Higher Educatuion, 10(3), 237-251.
Newman, C. J. H. (1956). On the scope and nature of university education. London: J. M. Dent & Sons Ltd.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (1973). Recurrent Education: A Strategy for Lifelong Learning. Paris: OCED.
Pace, C. R. (1984). Measuring the quality of college student experiences. Los Angeles, CA.: U.C.L.A. Higher Education Research Institute.
Pace, C. R. (1986). College student experiences. Los Angelas, C.A.: The Center for the Study of Evaluation UCLA Graduate School of Education.
Pace, C. R. (1990). The undergraduates. A report of their activities and progress in college in the 1980's. Los Angeles, California: Center for the study of Evaluation University of California.
Pascarella, E. T., & Ternzini, P.T. (1991). How college affects students: findings and insights from twenty years of research. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass
Perry, W. G., Jr. (1970). Forms of intellectural and ethical development in college. New York: Holt, Rinehart &Winstin.
Phillips, J. J. (1991). Handbook of Training Evaluation and Measurement Methods. (2nd ed.). Houston, TX: Gulf
Phillips, J. J. (1996). ROI: The search for best practices. Training & Development, (50)2. 42-47
Robinson, B. (1995). Research and pragamatism in learning support. In F. Lockwood (Ed.), Open and distance learning today. London: Routledge.
Rubeson, K. (1994). Recurrent Education Policy in Sweden: a Moving Target. International Reviews of Education. 40(3-5), 245-256.
Sewart, D., Keegan, D. & Holmberg, B. (1983). Distance education: International perspectives. London: Croom Helm.
Sisco, B. R. (1991). Setting the climate for effective teaching and learning. New Direction for Countinuing Education, 50, 41-50.
Smith, R. M. (1982). Learning how to learn: Applied learning theory for adults. Houston: Gulf Publishing Co.
Stark, J. S., Shaw, K. M., & Lowther, M. A. (1989). Student goals for college and courses. 1989 ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports. Washigton, DC: The George Washington University.
Stickley-Taylor, L. L. & Sasse E. B. (1990). An analysis of educational orientation and perceived teaching style. Continuing Higher Education Review, 54(2), 69-78.
Stufflebeam, D. L. Foley, W. J., Gephart, W. J., Guba, E.G. Hammond, R. L., Merriman, H.O. & Provus, M. M. (1971). Educational evaluation and decision making. Itasca, IL: Peacock.
Terenzini, P., Theophilides, C., & Lorang, W. (1984). Influences on students’ perceptions of their academic skill development during college. Journal of Higher Education, 55, 5,621-636.
Trancy, S. J. & Schuttenberg, E. M. (1986). Exploring adult learners’ rationales course interaction preference. Adult Education Quarterly, 36(3), 142-156.
Tuijnmam, A. (1989). Recurrent Education, earnings and well-being: a fifty-year longitudinal study of a cohort of Swedish men. Stockholm: Institute of International Education University of Stockholm.
Tuijnmam, A. (1991). Emerging system of recurrent education. Prospects, 21(1), 17-21.
Tuijnmam, A. (1996). Recurrent education. In A. C. Tuijnmen (Eds.). International Encyclopedia of adult Education and Training. Oxford: Pergamon.
UNESCO Institute for Education (2003). Nurturing the treasure: Vision and strategy 2002-2007. Hamburg: Author
Van Allen, G. H.(1982). Educational attitudes in a state system of community colleges. Community College Review, 10(2), 44-47.
Vosko, R. S. & Hiemstra, R (1988). The adult learning environment: Importance of psychical features. International Journal oh Lifelong Education, 7, 185-195.
Vosko, R. S. (1991). Where we learning shapes our learning. New Direction for Countinuing Education, 50, 23-32.
Warr, P., Bird, M., & Rackham, N. (1970). Evaluation of management training. London: Gower.