簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 張瑀宸
Chang, Yu-Chen
論文名稱: 無痕山林七大準則中尊重野生動植物之行為理論研究-以陽明山國家公園遊客為例
Respecting Wildlife within the Seven Principles of Leave No Trace: A Case Study of the Visitors’ Behaviors in Yangmingshan National Park
指導教授: 方偉達
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 環境教育研究所
Graduate Institute of Environmental Education
論文出版年: 2020
畢業學年度: 108
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 153
中文關鍵詞: 無痕山林行為意圖計畫行為理論
英文關鍵詞: Leave No Trace, Behavioral Intention, Theory of Planned Behavior
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202000073
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:317下載:32
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

有鑒於目前國內外的研究當中,專門探討特定親環境行爲,特別是戶外休閒遊憩方面的研究與相關文獻內容較少,本研究欲利用無痕山林(Leave No Trace, LNT)七大理論當中,尊重野生動植物(Respect Wildlife)的這一項特定行為作為研究基礎,以計畫行為理論驗證(Theory of Planned Behavior, TPB),探討造訪陽明山國家公園的遊客對於尊重野生動植物的行為意圖(Behavioral Intention)是受到哪些規範的影響。本研究以問卷調查法進行研究,主要以SPSS23系統進行資料分析,採用描述性統計(Descriptive Statistics)與推論性統計(Inferential Statistics),以及運用結構方程式模型(Structural Equation Modeling, SEM)的方法,分析並整合問卷調查的結果。
問卷調查之內容效度方面請三位專家學者進行審查,信度方面則是以項目分析法分析各個題目的p值,然而各題目p值皆小於0.05具有顯著性,並且各題目在極端組檢驗法的Cronbach Alpha皆大於0.7,因此調查題目皆適用。
然而,進行路徑係數分析亦有其顯著性,t值就是路徑係數的顯著性。結果表明了態度直接影響行為意圖並呈現顯著(t = 2.17),主觀規範不影響行為意圖且兩者之間沒有顯著差異(t = 1.01),知覺行為控制直接影響行為意圖且兩者之間呈現極顯著(t = 9.33),知覺行為控制不影響行為且不具顯著差異(t = 1.49),行為意圖直接強烈地影響行為並呈現極顯著(t = 3.82)。因此,可以得知,遊客在尊重野生動植物的態度與知覺行為控制直接影響行為意圖,行為意圖將直接影響行為表現;主觀規範不直接影響行為意圖,知覺行為控制不直接影響行為。
影響遊客在尊重野生動植物方面,態度表現的因子,可能與遊客認為尊重野生動植物有利於後代子孫的永續發展與福祉有關係;主觀規範則不是影響遊客行為表現的主要原因;不管在知覺行為控制、行為意圖與行為表現方面,遊客對於不干擾、不碰觸、不餵食野生動物,以及不攀折花木、不踐踏草坪都有相當高的認同度;雖然遊客可以知覺尊重野生動植物的容易程度,但是不一定能夠做到。在陽明山國家公園中,女性遊客在尊重野生動植物的行為表現優於男性遊客,聽說過無痕山林相關內容者的知覺行為控制與態度優於沒聽說過者。

In view of the studies on environmental behaviors are quite much nowadays, there are few studies on the specific environmental behaviors of outdoor recreation. Therefore, this research was conveyed one of the particular behavior of the LNT’s seven rules, renowned as respecting wildlife to explore how visitors concern about respecting wildlife or their behavioral intention when they visited within the Yangmingshan National Park. This study was used questionnaire to conduct this survey, detecting correspondingly the data mainly analyzed by SPSS23 system. Such as descriptive statistics, inferential statistics, and structural equation modeling were used to analyze the questionnaire.
Before the issuance, the validity and reliability analyses of the questionnaire have conducted to be established. Three experts and scholars were asked to review the validity. The reliability analysis was based on the item-analysis and the p-values of each topic which was less than 0.05. The Cronbach alpha of each topic in comparisons of extreme groups was greater than 0.7, so the survey questions were applicable.
However, the path analysis has its significance. The t-value is the significance of the path analysis. The results of path analysis showed that attitude and behavioral intentions were significant (t = 2.17), besides perceived behavioral control and behavioral intentions were significant (t = 9.33). The subjective norms and behavioral intentions were not significant (t = 1.01), indicating that there was no relationship between subjective norms and behavioral intentions. The perceived behavioral control and behavior could not be turned significant (t = 1.49), indicating that perceived behavioral control and behavior have no direct impact. Finally, behavioral intentions and behavior were significant (t = 3.82).
In addition, the factors that influence tourists 'attitudes towards respecting wildlife may be related to tourists' believed that respecting wildlife was beneficial to the sustainable development and welfare of future generations; subjective norms were not the main reason that affects the performance of tourists; In terms of perceived behavioral control, behavioral intentions, and behavior performance, tourists had a high degree of recognition beyond disturbing, touching, feeding wildlife and also not trampling on the lawn. Although tourists can perceive how easy to conduct which they can respect wildlife, tourists may not be able to contribute this pro-environmental behavior. However, the attitude and perceived behavioral control of those who had previously learned of the LNT were better than that of who never heard of the LNT. Moreover, the female tourists ' behavior were better than the male tourist on respecting wildlife.

第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究動機 4 第三節 研究目的 6 第四節 研究問題 6 第五節 名詞界定 7 第六節 研究限制 8 第二章 文獻回顧 9 第一節 無痕山林(Leave No Trace, LNT)的探討 9 第二節 環境行為模式(Environmental Behavior) 12 第三節 計畫行為理論(Theory of Planned Behavior) 21 第四節 陽明山國家公園的生態旅遊之相關文獻蒐集 23 第五節 國內外生態旅遊以計畫行為理論佐證之相關文獻蒐集 23 第六節 國內外國家公園以計畫行為理論佐證之相關文獻蒐集 25 第七節 結構方程式相關文獻蒐集 26 第三章 研究方法 28 第一節 研究架構 28 第二節 研究設計與假設 30 第三節 研究流程 32 第四節 研究範圍與對象 33 第五節 研究工具與問卷設計發展 34 第六節 問卷預試與信效度分析 39 第七節 資料蒐集與分析 50 第四章 結果與分析 55 第一節 背景變項敘述性統計 55 第二節 不同變項的敘述性統計 58 第三節 推論性統計 67 第四節 結構方程式 79 第五章 結論與建議 87 第一節 研究目的之考驗 87 第二節 研究假設之考驗 92 第三節 探討個人背景影響尊重野生動植物表現的研究結論 93 第四節 探討以計畫行為理論為模型的路徑分析研究結論 94 第五節 研究結論 97 第六節 研究建議與改善 97 引用文獻 100 英文文獻 100 中文文獻 107 網路資料 109 附錄 110 附錄一、計畫行為理論建構問卷之中英文翻譯內容(概念與方法) 110 附錄二、正式發放之問卷調查 112 附錄三、針對我國造訪陽明山國家公園的遊客對於無痕山林準則中尊重野生動植物的行為與知識、態度與行為意圖的調查問卷之初稿 120 附錄四、針對我國造訪陽明山國家公園的遊客對於無痕山林準則中尊重野生動植物的行為與知識、態度與行為意圖的調查問卷之專家建議表。 129 附錄五、問卷編擬說明 143 附錄六、給專家學者審查問卷初稿之邀請函 153

英文部分
Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In Action Control (pp. 11-39). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211.
Ajzen, I. (2002). Constructing a TPB questionnaire: Conceptual and methodological considerations.
Ajzen, I., & Driver, B. L. (1992). Application of the theory of planned behavior to leisure choice. Journal of leisure research, 24(3), 207-224.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour.
Ajzen, I., & Madden, T. J. (1986). Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. Journal of experimental social psychology, 22(5), 453-474.
Allen, J. B., & Ferrand, J. L. (1999). Environmental locus of control, sympathy, and proenvironmental behavior: A test of Geller’s actively caring hypothesis. Environment and behavior, 31(3), 338-353.
Axelrod, L. J.(1994).Balancing personal needs with environmental preservation: Identifying the values that guide decisions in ecological dilemmas. Journal of Social Issues, 50(3), 85-104.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 16(1), 74-94.
Bamberg, S. (2013). Changing environmentally harmful behaviors: A stage model of self-regulated behavioral change. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 151-159.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological bulletin, 88(3), 588.
Bilic-Zulle, L. (2011). Comparison of methods: Passing and Bablok regression. Biochemia medica: Biochemia medica, 21(1), 49-52.
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables John Wiley New York.
Bright, A. D., Fishbein, M., Manfredo, M. J., & Bath, A. (1993). Application of the Theory of Reasoned Action to the National Park Service's controlled burn policy. Journal of Leisure Research, 25(3), 263-280.
Browne, M. W., & Arminger, G. (1995). Specification and estimation of mean-and covariance-structure models. In Handbook of statistical modeling for the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 185-249). Springer, Boston, MA.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sage focus editions, 154, 136-136.
Browne, M. W., Cudeck, R., Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (1993). Testing structural equation models.
Burgess, J., Harrison, C. & Filius, P. (1998) Environmental communication and the cultural politics of environmental citizenship, Environment and Planning A, 30, pp. 1445–1460.
Campbell, J. M., & Mackay, K. (2003). Attitudinal and normative influences on support for hunting as a wildlife management strategy. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 8(3), 181-198.
Chawla, K. K., & Meyers, M. A. (1999). Mechanical behavior of materials (p. 217). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
D'agostino, R. B., Chase, W., & Belanger, A. (1988). The appropriateness of some common procedures for testing the equality of two independent binomial populations. The American Statistician, 42(3), 198-202.
Daniels, M. L., & Marion, J. L. (2005). Communicating Leave No Trace Ethics and Practices: Efficacy of Two-Day Trainer Courses. Journal of Park & Recreation Administration, 23(4).
Danilatos, G. D. (1991). Review and outline of environmental SEM at present. Journal of microscopy, 162(3), 391-402.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management science, 35(8), 982-1003.
De Groot, J., & Steg, L. (2007). General beliefs and the theory of planned behavior: The role of environmental concerns in the TPB. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(8), 1817-1836.
Dishaw, M. T., & Strong, D. M. (1999). Extending the technology acceptance model with task–technology fit constructs. Information & management, 36(1), 9-21.
Doll, W. J., Xia, W., & Torkzadeh, G. (1994). A confirmatory factor analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument. MIS quarterly, 453-461.
Dowell, D. L., & McCool, S. F. (1986). Evaluation of a wilderness information dissemination program. Paper presented at the National Wilderness Research Conference, Fort Collins, CO. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station.
Dunlap, R. E., & Mertig, A. G. (1995). Global concern for the environment: is affluence a prerequisite? Journal of Social Issues, 51(4), 121-137.
Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000). New trends in measuring environmental attitudes: measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: a revised NEP scale. Journal of social issues, 56(3), 425-442.
Falk, J. H. (2016). Identity and the museum visitor experience. Routledge.
Fan, X., Thompson, B., & Wang, L. (1999). Effects of sample size, estimation methods, and model specification on structural equation modeling fit indexes. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 56-83.
Fazio, J. R. (1979). Communicating with the wilderness user. Moscow, ID: Bulletin Number 28. University of Idaho, College of Forestry, Wildlife and Range Experiment Station.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research.
Ford, A.T. and L. Fahrig (2007) Diet and body size of North American mammal road mortalities.
Friedman, H.; Herskovitz, P.; Pollack, S. 1993. The biasing effects of scale-checking styles on response to a Likert scale. In: Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods section, American Statistical Association: 792-795.
Fulton, D. C., Manfredo, M. J., & Lipscomb, J. (1996). Wildlife value orientations: A conceptual and measurement approach. Human dimensions of wildlife, 1(2), 24-47.
Godin, G., Valois, P., & Lepage, L. (1993). The pattern of influence of perceived behavioral control upon exercising behavior: An application of Ajzen's theory of planned behavior. Journal of behavioral medicine, 16(1), 81-102.
Goh, E., Ritchie, B., & Wang, J. (2017). Non-compliance in national parks: An extension of the theory of planned behaviour model with pro-environmental values. Tourism Management, 59, 123-127.
Gorsuch, R. L. (1997). Exploratory factor analysis: Its role in item analysis. Journal of personality assessment, 68(3), 532-560.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Hammitt, W. E., Cole, D. N., & Monz, C. A. (2015). Wildland recreation: ecology and management. John Wiley & Sons.
Han, H., Hsu, L. T. J., & Sheu, C. (2010). Application of the theory of planned behavior to green hotel choice: Testing the effect of environmental friendly activities. Tourism management, 31(3), 325-334.
Heckhausen, H., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (1987). Thought contents and cognitive functioning in motivational versus volitional states of mind. Motivation and emotion, 11(2), 101-120.
Hinds, J., & Sparks, P. (2008). Engaging with the natural environment: The role of affective connection and identity. Journal of environmental psychology, 28(2), 109-120.
Hines, J. M., Hungerford, H. R., & Tomera, A. N. (1987). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. The Journal of environmental education, 18(2), 1-8.
Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Articles, 2.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to models. Sociol. Methodol, 13, 290-312.
Hungerford, H. R. Peyton. RB, Tomera, AN, Litherland, RA, Ramsey, JM, & Volk, TL (1985). Investigating and Evaluating Environmental Issues and Actions Skill Development Modules.
Hungerford, H. R., & Volk, T. L. (1990). Changing learner behavior through environmental education. The journal of environmental education, 21(3), 8-21.
Hunter, L. M., Hatch, A., & Johnson, A. (2004). Cross‐national gender variation in environmental behaviors. Social science quarterly, 85(3), 677-694.
Ickes, W., Patterson, M. L., Rajecki, D. W., & Tanford, S. (1982). Behavioral and cognitive consequences of reciprocal versus compensatory responses to preinteraction expectancies. Social Cognition, 1(2), 160-190.
Jackson, T. (2005). Motivating sustainable consumption: A review of evidence on consumer behaviour and behavioural change. Sustainable Development Research Network, 29, 30.
Jensen, B. B., & Schnack, K. (1997). The action competence approach in environmental education. Environmental education research, 3(2), 163-178.
Joreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Scientific Software International.
Joreskog, K. G., & Van Thillo, M. (1972). LISREL: A general computer program for estimating a linear structural equation system involving multiple indicators of unmeasured variables.
Kaiser, F. G., Wölfing, S., & Fuhrer, U. (1999). Environmental attitude and ecological behaviour. Journal of environmental psychology, 19(1), 1-19.
Karp, D. G. (1996). Values and their effect on pro-environmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 28(1), 111-133.
Kim, Y., & Han, H. (2010). Intention to pay conventional-hotel prices at a green hotel–a modification of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 18(8), 997-1014.
Knight, R.L., & Gutzwiller, K.J. (eds). 1995. Wildlife and Recreationists: Coexistence through management and research. Washington, D.C., Island Press.
Kollmuss, A., &Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental education research, 8(3), 239-260.
Kortenkamp, K. V., & Moore, C. F. (2001). Ecocentrism and anthropocentrism: Moral reasoning about ecological commons dilemmas. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(3), 261-272.
Lomax, R. G., & Schumacker, R. E. (2004). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. psychology press.
López-Mosquera, N., & Sánchez, M. (2012). Theory of planned behavior and the value-belief-norm theory explaining willingness to pay for a suburban park. Journal of environmental management, 113, 251-262.
MacCallum, R. C., & Hong, S. (1997). Power analysis in covariance structure modeling using GFI and AGFI. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32(2), 193-210.
Marcinkowski, T. J. (1989). An analysis of correlates and predictors of responsible environmental behavior, unpublished doctoral dissertation, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale.
Marion, J. L., & Reid, S. E. (2001). Development of the US Leave No Trace program: an historical perspective. Boulder, Colo.: Leave No Trace.
Marion, J.L. &Merriam, L.C. 1985. Recreational impacts on well-established campsites in the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. Station Technical Bulletin AD-SB-2502. St. Paul, MN, University of Minnesota, Agricultural Experiment Station.
Markolt, F., Szemethy, L., Lehoczki, R., & Heltai, M. (2012). Spatial and temporal evaluation of wildlife-vehicle collisions along the M3 Highway in Hungary. North-Western Journal of Zoology, 8(2).
Mathieson, A. C., & Nienhuis, P. H. (1991). Intertidal and littoral ecosystems.
McCright, A. M., & Xiao, C. (2014). Gender and environmental concern: Insights from recent work and for future research. Society & Natural Resources, 27(10), 1109-1113.
McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M. H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological methods, 7(1), 64.
Miller, J., Brown, L., Hill, E., Shellman, A., Ramsing, R., & Gómez, E. (2012). Measuring the Educational Impact of Promoting Environmental Awareness in Kids (PEAK): the development and implementation of a new scale. In In: Fisher, Cherie LeBlanc; Watts, Clifton E., Jr., eds. Proceedings of the 2010 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-P-94. Newtown Square, PA: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station: 155-158.(pp. 155-158).
Mostafa, M. M. (2007). Gender differences in Egyptian consumers’ green purchase behaviour: the effects of environmental knowledge, concern and attitude. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 31(3), 220-229.
Morwitz, V. G., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2004). The mere-measurement effect: Why does measuring intentions change actual behavior?. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(1-2), 64-74.
Newhouse, N. (1991) Implications of attitude and behavior research for environmental conservation, The Journal of Environmental Education, 22(1), pp. 26–32.
Nordlund, A. M., & Garvill, J. (2002). Value structures behind pro-environmental behavior. Environment and behavior, 34(6), 740-756.
Ostermier, D. (2010). Human Dimensions of Natural Resource Management.
Oskamp, S. (2000). A sustainable future for humanity? How can psychology help? American Psychologist, 55(5), 496.
Owens, S. (2000) Engaging the public: information and deliberation in environmental policy, Environment and Planning A, 32, pp. 1141–1148.
Pettus, A. M., & Giles, M. B. (1987). Personality characteristics and environmental attitudes. Population and Environment, 9(3), 127-137.
Pooley, J. A., & o’Connor, M. (2000). Environmental education and attitudes: Emotions and beliefs are what is needed. Environment and behavior, 32(5), 711-723.
Reigner, N., & Lawson, S. R. (2009). Improving the Efficacy of Visitor Education in Haleakalā National Park Using the Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Interpretation Research, 14(2).
Reisinger, Y., & Turner, L. (1999). Structural equation modeling with Lisrel: application in tourism. Tourism Management, 20(1), 71-88.
Rekola, E. P. M. (2001). The theory of planned behavior in predicting willingness to pay for abatement of forest regeneration. Society & Natural Resources, 14(2), 93-106.
Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.
Rolston, H. (1985). Valuing wildlands. Environmental Ethics, 7(1), 23-48.
Rotter, J. B. (1954). Social learning and clinical psychology.
Sauvé, L. (1996). Environmental education and sustainable development: A further appraisal. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 1, 7-34.
Scheffé, H. (1953). A method for judging all contrasts in the analysis of variance. Biometrika, 40(1-2), 87-110.
Schultz, R. T., Gauthier, I., Klin, A., Fulbright, R. K., Anderson, A. W., Volkmar, F., ...& Gore, J. C. (2000). Abnormal ventral temporal cortical activity during face discrimination among individuals with autism and Asperger syndrome. Archives of general Psychiatry, 57(4), 331-340.
Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 19-45.
Schwartz, S. H., & Howard, J. A. (1981). A normative decision-making model ofaltruism. In J. P. Rushton, & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Altruism and helping behavior(pp. 189e211). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbau
Simon, G. L., & Alagona, P. S. (2009). Beyond leave no trace. Ethics, Place and Environment 12(1), 17-34.
Sparks, P., Guthrie, C. A., & Shepherd, R. (1997). The dimensional structure of the perceived behavioral control construct 1. Journal of applied social psychology, 27(5), 418-438.
Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25(2), 173-180.
Stern, P. C. (2000). Towards a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407-424.
Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A., & Kalof, L. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 81-97.
Turaga, R. M. R., Howarth, R. B., & Borsuk, M. E. (2010). Pro-environmental behavior: Rational choice meets moral motivation. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1185(1), 211-224.
Vagias, W. M., & Powell, R. B. (2010). Backcountry visitors leave no trace attitudes. International Journal of Wilderness, 16(3), 21-27.
Vagias, W. M., Powell, R. B., Moore, D. D., & Wright, B. A. (2012). Development, psychometric qualities, and cross-validation of the Leave No Trace Attitudinal Inventory and Measure (LNT AIM). Journal of Leisure Research, 44(2), 234-256.
Wahba, M. A., & Bridwell, L. G. (1976). Maslow reconsidered: A review of research on the need hierarchy theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 15(2), 212-240.
Xiao, C., & Hong, D. (2010). Gender differences in environmental behaviors in China. Population and Environment, 32(1), 88-104.
Zelezny, L. C., Chua, P. P., & Aldrich, C. (2000). New ways of thinking about environmentalism: Elaborating on gender differences in environmentalism. Journal of Social issues, 56(3), 443-457.
Zhou, L., Li, Q., & Zhu, L. (2014). Outcome efficacy, people-destination affect, and tourist’s environmentally responsible behavior intention: A revised model based on the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Zhejiang University: Humanities and Social Sciences, 44(2), 88-98.

中文部分
王文科與王智弘(2005)。教育研究法(增訂九版)。臺北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
王成財、陳金足、王小龍(2010)。大學生參與休閒活動之行為意圖研究。萬能學 報,(32),279-291。
吳忠宏、范莉雯、蘇珮玲(2003)。大學生參與生態旅遊行為意圖之相關研究。
吳忠宏、蘇珮玲(2005)。職前教師參與生態旅遊活動之行為意圖研究。臺中教育大學學報:教育類,2005,19.2: 73-97。
吳明隆(2007)。SPSS操作與應用:問卷統計分析實務。臺北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
吳明隆(2008)。SPSS 操作與應用多變量分析實務。臺北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
吳明隆與涂金堂(2010)。SPSS與統計應用分析。臺北市:五南圖書出版股份有限 公司。
吳崇旗(2009)。無痕山林(LNT)準則融入登山教育課程對環境態度之影響研究。體育學報,42 卷 1 期,69-82 頁。
吳崇旗(2011)。無痕山林宣導方案之執行與成效。大專體育學刊,13(1),32-43。
吳崇旗(2011)。無痕山林宣導方案之執行與成效。大專體育學刊,13(1),32-43。
吳崇旗、王偉琴、周靈山(2009)。建構無痕山林準則爲架構之戶外環境行爲量表。休閒產業管理學刊,2(1),14-27。
李永展(1995)。環境態度與環保行為: 理論與實證 (Vol. 4)。胡氏圖書。
李柏慧與劉淑燕(2005)。民眾從事健走行為意圖之研究。大專體育學刊,7(1),147-156。
李思屏、林晏州(2001)。遊客對生態旅遊之環境態度與行爲關係之研究-以關渡自然公園爲例。戶外遊憩研究,14(3),15-36。
李能慧、古東源、吳桂森與余泰魁(2004)。金門觀光客行為傾向模式之建構。管理學報,21(1),131-151。
汪靜明(2003)。 環境教育的生態理念與意涵。環境教育學刊,2,9-46。
汪靜明(2004)。陽明山國家公園園區生態工法之研究。中華生態資訊協會。
周儒(2013):《自然是最好的學校-臺灣環境教育實踐》。上海,上海科學技術出版社。
林秋慧(2008)。以計劃行為理論探討大專教職員休閒運動行為。南亞學報,(28), 367-383。
林俊昇與黃文琪(2000)。遊客參與生態活動保育認知之研究-結構方程式模型的應用。戶外遊憩研究,13(2),45-65。
林傑斌與劉明德(2002)。SPSS 11.0 與統計模式建構。文魁資訊。
林愷茵與李明聰(2012)。計劃行為理論探討遊客對於生態旅遊之行為意圖-以台江國家公園為例。休閒暨觀光產業研究第六卷第一期中華民國 101 年 5 月原創性論文,6(1),42。
林輔瑾(1996)。專科學生從事規律運動意圖之研究─計劃行為之應。國立台灣師範大學衛生教育研究所碩士論文。
邱皓政 (2010)。量化硏究與統計分析: SPSS (PASW)資料分析範例。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
洪慎憶與凌德麟(1995)。影響遊客對生態旅遊態度因子之探討-以陽明山國家公園爲例。戶外遊憩研究,8(3),103-128。
徐茂洲、潘豐泉與黃茜梅(2011)。綠島水域運動觀光客之行爲研究-計畫行爲理論驗證。臺灣體育運動管理學報,11(2),85-107。
康書華(1997)。大學生對國家公園前往意願之研究─以理性行動和計劃行為理論為應用。中國文化大學觀光事業學系碩士論文。
張志銘(2007)。以科技接受模型驗證桌球運動參與行爲之意向。管理實務與理論研究,1(2),76-88。
張孝銘(2009)。遊客對海域運動觀光吸引力認知、旅遊體驗、知覺價值與行為意向之研究。休閒產業管理學刊,2(3),31-51。
張樑治(2008)。森林遊樂區遊客違法行為成因:綜合道德規範與防衛空間之觀點。屏東科技大學生物資源研究所學位論文,1-139。
梁銘宗(2001)。森林生態系經營的遊憩活動----生態旅遊。
郭育任(2006)。台灣國家步道環境優化推動發展計畫.。無痕山林—九十五年度國家步道環境優化研討會論文集 (頁 54-49)。臺北市:行政院農委會林務局。
郭育任(2007)。全國步道系統藍圖規劃之芻議。臺灣林業,33 (1),39-49。
郭寶章(2005)。 森林的功能與保育。科學發展,388,6-13。
陳玉清與林晏州(2003)。生態旅遊地遊客選擇行爲之研究。戶外遊憩研究,16(3),23-40。
陳郁璿(2009)。無痕山林宣導課程設計及其對大學生環境態度之影響研究。屏東科技大學休閒運動保健系所學位論文,1-88。
游登良(1994)。國家公園:全人類的自然襲產。花蓮縣:太魯閣國家公園管理處。
曾鈺琪(2011)。戶外環境教育之教學資源運用-以國家公園系統為例。環境教育師資培育研習工作坊:校外教學與校園環境教學論文集。臺北市:國立臺灣師範 大學師資培訓處。
無痕山林運動執行委員會(2007)。無痕山林教育宣導手冊。臺北市:農業委員會林務局。
無痕山林運動執行委員會(2007)。無痕山林教育宣導手冊。臺北市:農業委員會林務局。
黃光瀛(2001)。「公路對陽明山國家公園野生動物的影響及改進規劃」自行研究報告(九十年)。內政部營建署陽明山國家公園管理處。16 頁。
黃光瀛(2002)。「公路對陽明山國家公園野生動物的影響及改進與建議」自行研究 報告(九十一年)。內政部營建署陽明山國家公園管理處。21 頁。
楊世瑩(2009)。SPSS統計分析即學即用。臺北市:碁峯資訊。
楊冠政(1997)。 環境教育。臺北市:明文書局股份有限公司。
廖永靜(2000)。兒童的環境覺知與環境教育 (下部)。
臺灣森林志編纂委員會(1993)。臺灣林業志(中華林學叢書936號)。臺北市:中華林學會。
劉小如(2008)。陽明山國家公園生態廊道系統評估之研究陽明山國家公園管理處委託研究報告。國科會編號:PG9703-0073。
蔡慧敏(2001)。國家公園推動生物多樣性教育的角色與問題探討。國家公園生物多樣性保育策略之研究與生物多樣性保育策略研討會論文集,國家公園學會主辦 (2001 年 9 月 13-14 日),188-196。
鄭品睿(2012)。延伸性計畫行為理論在生態旅遊的應用-以陽明山國家公園為例。交通大學經營管理研究所學位論文,1-61。
蕭文龍(2009)。多變量分析最佳入門實用書-SPSS+ LISREL。

網頁資料
陽明山國家公園(2018-03-04)。陽明山國家公園行政服務【網頁資料】。取自http://www.ymsnp.gov.tw/index.php?option=com_govopen&view=stats&gp=0&Itemid=456。

下載圖示
QR CODE