簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 吳佳諶
Wu, Chia-Chen
論文名稱: 視覺障礙長者數位能力與需求之研究
Study on Digital Competence and Needs of Elderly People with Visual Impairments
指導教授: 張千惠
Chang, Chien-Huey
口試委員: 張千惠
Chang, Chien-Huey
何英奇
Ho, Ying-Chyi
洪雅惠
Hong, Ya-Hui
口試日期: 2024/07/18
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 特殊教育學系
Department of Special Education
論文出版年: 2024
畢業學年度: 112
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 175
中文關鍵詞: 數位能力數位落差數位年長者視覺障礙
英文關鍵詞: digital competence, digital divide, digital, elder, visual impairment
研究方法: 調查研究
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202401456
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:145下載:5
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探討視覺障礙長者的數位能力發展現況、數位能力發展相關需求,並探討視覺障礙長者間數位落差的情形。採用調查研究法,以問卷調查進行資料收集。調查問卷引用2021年國家發展委員會針對全國身心障礙者數位發展的調查問卷作使用,進行面對面以及電話訪談逐題訪問,做為資料的收集與分析。研究參與者透過社團法人中華視障安養福利協會,招募60歲以上視覺障礙長者,進行立意取樣,計有100人接受調查,包含女性43位及男性57位,共計100份有效問卷。本研究結果發現:一、八成以上的視覺障礙長者積極參與網路世界,但不到三成能夠獨立操作資訊設備。二、九成以上的視覺障礙長者需要輔助軟體參與網路世界,其中四成以上有數位相關課程的需求。三、數位落差確實存在視覺障礙長者間,包括第一層數位落差以及第二層數位落差。四、個人背景變項中的年齡、自覺經濟狀況以及視覺障礙狀況顯著影響視覺障礙長者數位能力發展。因此儘管超過八成的視覺障礙長者活躍於網絡世界,仍需關注那些未參與網絡世界的視覺障礙長者。資訊訓練的設計和安排應針對視覺障礙長者的需求,並考慮個人背景變項,以更有效地提升他們的數位能力發展。這不僅能提升其生活品質,還能確保他們在中高齡重返職場的趨勢中不被排除。除此之外,本研究顯示視覺障礙長者參與數位世界中的情況及統計分析結果,希望能夠以此為基礎,提供政府部門、社會福利機構及職業訓練單位對於視覺障礙長者參與網路世界之相關建議及啟發,以進一步促進視覺障礙長者的數位能力發展與社會融合。

    This study aims to explore the current status of digital competence development among visually impaired elderly individuals, their related needs, and the digital divide among them. A survey research method was used, with data collected through questionnaires. The survey questionnaire was adapted from the 2021 National Development Council's survey on digital development among people with disabilities in Taiwan. Data collection involved face-to-face and telephone interviews, where participants were asked directly questions. Participants were recruited through the Taiwan Association for the Welfare of the Visually Impaired, with a purpose sample of 100 individuals aged 60 and above, including 43 women and 57 men, resulting in 100 valid questionnaires. The findings of this study revealed: 1. Over 80% of visually impaired elderly individuals actively participate in the online world, but less than 30% can independently operate digital devices. 2. Over 90% of visually impaired elderly individuals require assistive software to participate in the online world, with over 40% expressing a need for digital-related courses. 3. A digital divide indeed exists among visually impaired elderly individuals, encompassing both the first-level and second-level digital divides. 4. Age, perceived economic status, and visual impairment among individual background variables significantly affect the development of digital competence in elderly individuals with visual impairments. Therefore, despite more than 80% of elderly individuals with visual impairments being active in the online world, it is still important to pay attention to those who are not participating. The design and arrangement of information training should be tailored to the needs of visually impaired seniors and consider individual background variables to more effectively enhance their digital competence development. This not only improves their quality of life but also ensures they are not excluded from the trend of middle-aged and older adults returning to the workforce. Moreover, this study presents the situation and statistical analysis results of visually impaired seniors participating in the digital world. It is hoped that this can provide a basis for government departments, social welfare organizations, and vocational training units to offer relevant recommendations and insights for visually impaired seniors engaging in the online world, further promoting their digital competence development and social integration.

    第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究動機 3 第三節 研究目的與問題 5 第四節 名詞釋義 6 第二章 文獻探討 9 第一節 數位能力相關文獻 9 第二節 高齡化與數位能力相關文獻 14 第三節 數位落差 15 第四節 一般長者與視覺障礙長者數位能力發展相關文獻 18 第五節 文獻總結 22 第三章 研究方法 23 第一節 研究設計 23 第二節 研究參與者 34 第三節 研究工具 35 第四節 資料分析方法 42 第五節 研究程序 43 第六節 研究倫理 44 第四章 研究結果與討論 47 第一節 視覺障礙長者數位能力發展現況 47 第二節 視障長者與全國身心障礙者數位能力發展差異狀況 83 第三節 視覺障礙長者數位能力發展相關需求 87 第四節 視覺障礙長者間數位落差狀況 112 第五節 顯著影響數位能力發展的個人背景變項 115 第六節 綜合討論 133 第五章 結論與建議 145 第一節 結論 145 第二節 未來研究建議 146 參考文獻 148 中文文獻 148 英文文獻 150 附錄(一) 視覺障礙長者數位能力與需求問卷 159 附錄(二) 研究協助同意書 173 附錄(三) 研究倫理審查核可證明書 174 附錄(四) 衛生福利部視覺障礙規定基準以及分級 175

    中華民國內政部(2023)。民國112年9月戶口統計資料分析。https://www.moi.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=9&sms=9009&s=297136
    中華民國統計資訊網(2021)。國情統計通報。https://www.stat.gov.tw/public/Data/132162358VPAVQ8D.pdf
    中華民國衛生福利部統計處(2023)。身心障礙統計專區。https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/dos/cp-5224-62359-113.html
    中華民國國家發展委員會(2021)。110年身心障礙者數位發展現況與需求調查報告。https://ws.ndc.gov.tw/Download.ashx?u=LzAwMS9hZG1pbmlzdHJhdG9yLzEwL2NrZmlsZS9hZWY3YjUxYi04YzY5LTQxMWUtOGFmZC1lNzIxYWY4YzIwMjUucGRm&n=MTEw5bm06Lqr5b%2BD6Zqc56SZ6ICF5pW45L2N55m85bGV6Kq%2F5p%2Bl5aCx5ZGKKOWFrOWRiueJiCkucGRm&icon=.pdf
    財團法人台灣網路資訊中心(2023)。台灣網路報告。 
    https://report.twnic.tw/2023/
    許明木、莊素貞、鄭靜瑩、陳賢堂、王俊諺、吳承臻、林則豪、許淑貞、連政炘、葉志偉、詹益智、蔡龍輝、謝錫寶(2021)。低視力學(第二版)。五南。
    紐文英(2021)。質性研究方法與論文寫作(三版)。雙葉書廊有限公司。
    黃正吉、吳天方(2020)。探討台灣人口高齡化與健保支付的關聯性。嶺東通識教育研究學刊,8(3),37-54。
    黃誌坤(2013)。阿公阿嬤e起來:老人上網裴利方案之研究。屏東教育大學學報-教育類,40,1-34。
    黃誌坤(2012)。「不要叫我數位文盲!」-老人上網經驗之優勢觀點分析。高雄師大學報:教育與社會科學類,(32),135-157。
    Jack R. F., Norman E. W., & Helen H. H. (2022)。教育研究法: 研究設計實務(楊孟麗、謝水南譯)。心理出版社股份有限公司。(原著出版年:2018)
    王雲東(2003)。台灣地區老人經濟人權發展的現況與展望。總統府人權立國學術研討會。
    中華民國國家發展委員會(2020)。109年數位發展調查報告。https://ws.ndc.gov.tw/Download.ashx?u=LzAwMS9hZG1pbmlzdHJhdG9yLzEwL2NrZmlsZS80M2FmZmM1Zi04NmU1LTQyYjEtOWQ3YS04ZTA1YTcyZGVmZjIucGRm&n=MTA55bm05pW45L2N55m85bGV6Kq%2F5p%2Bl5aCx5ZGKKOWFrOWRiueJiCkucGRm&icon=.pdf
    蔡琰、臧國仁(2008)。熟年世代網際網路之使用與老人自我形象與社會角色建構。新聞學研究,97,1-43。
    曾淑芬(2006)。高齡者電腦網路使用行為與生活滿意度關係之研究。〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立中正大學。
    臺北市政府社會局(2024)。身心障礙人數統計表。https://dosw.gov.taipei/cp.aspx?n=BA5B128CF7454DDC
    新北市政府社會局(2024)。統計報表。https://www.sw.ntpc.gov.tw/home.jsp?id=17f8183ab31ce784
    林琮恩(2024年1月10日)。國科會計畫4年砸95億 盼提升國內高齡科技產值至3千億。聯合報。https://udn.com/news/story/7238/7698865
    銀天下(2023)。94歲上班去!日本最新調查:60歲以上勞動參與率創新高,他們如何打造高齡友善職場?銀天下。https://www.cw.com.tw/index.php/aging/article/5127185
    民視新聞網(2024)。台灣1/5人口將逾65歲 勞動部曝《中高齡就業促進法》重要性。民視新聞網。https://www.ftvnews.com.tw/news/detail/2024717W0150
    Adeyemon, E. (2009). Integrating digital literacies into outreach services for underserved youth populations. The reference librarian, 50(1), 85-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763870802546423
    Ari, I. A., & Inan, F. A. (2010). Assistive Technologies for Students with Disabilities: A Survey of Access and Use in Turkish Universities. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 9(2), 40-45. https://hdl.handle.net/11511/65025
    Asuncion, J. V., Budd, J., Fichten, C. S., Nguyen, M. N., Barile, M., & Amsel, R. (2012). Social media use by students with disabilities. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 16(1), 30-35. file:///C:/Users/user/Downloads/abSocialMediaUse_0.pdf
    Barile, M., Fichten, C. S., & Asuncion, J. V. (2012). Enhancing human rights: computer and information technologies with access for all. International Journal of Social and Humanistic Computing, 1(4), 396-407. doi:10.1504/IJSHC.2012.053163
    Barraga, N. C., & Erin, J. N. (1992). Visual handicaps and learning. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
    Bergström, A. (2017). Digital equality and the uptake of digital applications among seniors of different age. Nordicom Review, 38(s1), 79-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/nor-2017-0398
    Balytska, M., Honchar, I., Rašticová, M., Versal, N., Tkalenko, N., & Prykaziuk, N. (2023, October). Unlocking the Potential Under Ageing Labor Force and Digitalization Challenges. In 2023 IEEE 4th KhPI Week on Advanced Technology (KhPIWeek) (pp. 1-7). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/KhPIWeek61412.2023.10313005.
    Cotten, S. R., Anderson, W. A., & McCullough, B. M. (2013). Impact of internet use on loneliness and contact with others among older adults: cross-sectional analysis. Journal of medical Internet research, 15(2), e2306. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2306
    Centeio, E. E. (2017). The have and have nots: an ever-present digital divide. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 88(6), 11-12. doi: 10.1080/07303084.2017.1331643
    Choi, N. G., DiNitto, D. M., Lee, O. E., & Choi, B. Y. (2020). Internet and health information technology use and psychological distress among older adults with self-reported vision impairment: case-control study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(6), e17294. https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.17294.
    Duay, D. L. (2007). In their own words: Older adults' perceptions of effective and ineffective learning experiences (pp. 1-173). Florida Atlantic University.
    Domingo, M. C. (2012). An overview of the Internet of Things for people with disabilities. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 35(2), 584-596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2011.10.015
    Ervin, S. L. (2000). Fourteen forecasts for an aging society. The Futurist, 34(6), 24. https://www.proquest.com/docview/218582533?accountid=14228&sourcetype=Magazines
    Erstad, O. (2010). Educating the digital generation. Nordic journal of digital literacy, 5(1), 56-71. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1891-943X-2010-01-05
    Eshet, Y. (2012). Thinking in the digital era: A revised model for digital literacy. Issues in informing science and information technology, 9(2), 267-276. https://doi.org/10.28945/1621
    Eurostat. (2016). Internet access and use statistics—Households and individuals.
    EATT Project Consortium (2003). The IT needs of people with vision impairments and the related needs of training service providers.
    Findlay, R. A. (2003). Interventions to reduce social isolation amongst older people: where is the evidence?. Ageing & Society, 23(5), 647-658. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X03001296
    Fokkema, T., & Knipscheer, K. (2007). Escape loneliness by going digital: A quantitative and qualitative evaluation of a Dutch experiment in using ECT to overcome loneliness among older adults. doi: 10.1080/13607860701366129
    Ferrari, A., & DIGCOMP, B. B. (2013). A framework for developing and understanding digital competence in Europe. IPTS Reports. Luxembourg: European Commission. http://dx.doi.org/10.2788/52966
    Friemel, T. N. (2016). The digital divide has grown old: Determinants of a digital divide among seniors. New media & society, 18(2), 313-331. doi:10.1177/1461444814538648
    Fang, M. L., Canham, S. L., Battersby, L., Sixsmith, J., Wada, M., & Sixsmith, A. (2019). Exploring privilege in the digital divide: implications for theory, policy, and practice. The Gerontologist, 59(1), e1-e15. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gny037
    Ganesh, S., & Barber, K. F. (2009). The silent community: Organizing zones in the digital divide. Human Relations, 62(6), 851-874. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709104545
    Gallagher, B. A. M., Murphy, E., & Fennell, A. (2012). Ageing, vision impairment and digital inclusion in Ireland. The Journal of Community Informatics, 8(1), 1712-1744. http://dx.doi.org/10.15353/joci.v8i1.3069
    Girdner, L. D. (2003). Adult learning on the Internet: Engaging the seniornet process. Oklahoma State University.
    Hargittai, E. (2002). Second-level digital divide: differences in people’s online skills. doi: https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v7i4.942
    He, W., Li, P., Gao, Y., You, J., Chang, J., Qu, X., & Zhang, W. (2022). Self-reported visual impairment and depression of middle-aged and older adults: The chain-mediating effects of internet use and social participation. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 957586. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.957586
    Hargittai, E., & Dobransky, K. (2017). Old dogs, new clicks: Digital inequality in skills and uses among older adults. Canadian Journal of Communication, 42(2), 195-212. https://doi.org/10.22230/cjc.2017v42n2a3176
    Holman, J., Lazar, J., & Feng, J. (2008). Investigating the security-related challenges of blind users on the web. In Designing inclusive futures (pp. 129-138). Springer London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-211-1_13
    Hassan, A., Abd El Aziz, R., & Hamza, M. (2021, December). Internet Banking Accessibility: The Social and Financial Exclusion of People with Visual Disability. In 2021 31st International Conference on Computer Theory and Applications (ICCTA) (pp. 59-65). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCTA54562.2021.9916623.
    Ho, D. K. (2018). Voice-controlled virtual assistants for the older people with visual impairment. Eye, 32(1), 53-54. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2017.165.
    Inan, F. A., Namin, A. S., Pogrund, R. L., & Jones, K. S. (2016). Internet use and cybersecurity concerns of individuals with visual impairments. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(1), 28-40. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/jeductechsoci.19.1.28
    Ilomäki, L., Kantosalo, A., & Lakkala, M. (2011). What is digital competence?. Linked portal. http://hdl.handle.net/10138/154423
    Jones, R. B., Ashurst, E. J., Atkey, J., & Duffy, B. (2015). Older people going online: its value and before-after evaluation of volunteer support. Journal of medical Internet research, 17(5), e122. http://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3943
    Krumsvik, R. J. (2008). Situated learning and teachers’ digital competence. Education and information technologies, 13(4), 279-290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-008-9069-5
    Kumar, S., Underwood, S. H., Masters, J. L., Manley, N. A., Konstantzos, I., Lau, J., Haller, R., & Wang, L. M. (2023). Ten questions concerning smart and healthy built environments for older adults. Building and Environment, 244, 110720. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110720
    Karavidas, M. K. (2003). The effects of computer usage on the retired older adult population. Carlos Albizu University.
    Koustriava, E., & Papadopoulos, K. (2014). Attitudes of individuals with visual impairments towards distance education. Universal access in the information society, 13, 439-447. doi:10.1007/s10209-013-0331-2
    Lythreatis, S., Singh, S. K., & El-Kassar, A. N. (2022). The digital divide: A review and future research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121359. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121359
    Leavitt, H. J. (2002). Technology and organizations: Where's the off button?. California Management Review, 44(2), 126-140. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166126
    Liu, Q., Pan, H., & Wu, Y. (2020). Migration status, internet use, and social participation among middle-aged and older adults in China: consequences for depression. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(16), 6007. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17166007
    Lam, L., & Lam, M. (2009). The use of information technology and mental health among older care-givers in Australia. Aging & mental health, 13(4), 557-562. doi: 10.1080/13607860802607306
    Lelkes, O. (2013). Happier and less isolated: Internet use in old age. Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, 21(1), 33-46. https://doi.org/10.1332/175982713X664047
    Lissitsa, S., Chachashvili-Bolotin, S., & Bokek-Cohen, Y. A. (2017). Digital skills and extrinsic rewards in late career. Technology in Society, 51, 46-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHSOC.2017.07.006.
    Malta, S. (2012). Using online methods to interview older adults about their romantic and sexual relationships. In Researching Later Life and Ageing: Expanding Qualitative Research Horizons (pp. 146-172). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. doi:10.1057/9781137271372_9
    Mills, R. E. (2005). The experience of learning computer skills for low-income African American and Hispanic seniors (Doctoral dissertation, Walden University).
    Madden, M., Lenhart, A., Cortesi, S., & Gasser, U. (2010). Pew Internet and American life project. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. http://www.pewinternet.org/2010/08/27/older-adults-and-social-media/
    Neves, B. B., Waycott, J., & Malta, S. (2018). Old and afraid of new communication technologies? Reconceptualising and contesting the ‘age-based digital divide’. Journal of Sociology, 54(2), 236-248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1440783318766119
    Office for National Statistics (2020). Internet Users, UK: 2020. https://www.ons.gov.uk/businessindustryandtrade/itandinternetindustry/bulletins/internetusers/2020
    Okonji, P., Lhussier, M., Bailey, C., & Cattan, M. (2015). Internet use: Perceptions and experiences of visually impaired older adults. Journal of Social Inclusion, 6(1), 120-145. http://dx.doi.org/10.36251/josi95
    Olalere, A., & Lazar, J. (2011). Accessibility of US federal government home pages: Section 508 compliance and site accessibility statements. Government Information Quarterly, 28(3), 303-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.02.002
    Oliveira, J. D., Engelmann, D. C., Kniest, D., Vieira, R., & Bordini, R. H. (2022). Multi-agent interaction to assist visually-impaired and elderly people. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(15), 8945. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19158945.
    Pew Research Center (2017). Disabled Americans are less likely to use technology. https://www.benton.org/headlines/disabled-americans-are-less-likely-use-technology
    Piper, A. M., Brewer, R., & Cornejo, R. (2017). Technology learning and use among older adults with late-life vision impairments. Universal Access in the Information Society, 16(3), 699-711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-016-0500-1.
    Robinson, L., Cotten, S. R., Ono, H., Quan-Haase, A., Mesch, G., Chen, W., ... & Stern, M. J. (2015). Digital inequalities and why they matter. Information, communication & society, 18(5), 569-582. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1012532
    Rogers, S. E. (2016). Bridging the 21st century digital divide. TechTrends, 60(3), 197-199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0057-0
    Shi, S., Zhang, L., & Wang, G. (2023). Bridging the Digital Divide: Internet Use of Older People from the Perspective of Peer Effects. Sustainability, 15(15), 12024. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151512024
    Sum, S., Mathews, R. M., Hughes, I., & Campbell, A. (2008). Internet use and loneliness in older adults. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(2), 208-211. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2007.0010
    Smith, A. (2014). Older adults and technology use. doi: 20.500.12592/95zsg4
    Shapira, N., Barak, A., & Gal, I. (2007). Promoting older adults' well-being through Internet training and use. Aging & mental health, 11(5), 477–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607860601086546
    Shuster, N. E. (2002). The assistive technology assessment: An instrument for team use. Journal of Special Education Technology, 17(1), 39. https://0-www.proquest.com.opac.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/scholarly-journals/assistive-technology-assessment-instrument-team/docview/228405423/se-2
    Seligmann, J. (1990). Making the most of sight. Newsweek, 115(16), 92-93.
    Stojković-Zlatanović, S., & Jovanović, P. (2023). Workforce aging and decent work in the era of the digital economy–towards a holistic public policy approach. Stanovništvo, 61(1), 53-68. https://doi.org/10.2298/stnv230220001s.
    Smedema, S. M., & McKenzie, A. R. (2010). The relationship among frequency and type of internet use, perceived social support, and sense of well-being in individuals with visual impairments. Disability and rehabilitation, 32(4), 317-325. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638280903095908.
    United Nations. (2020). World Population Ageing 2019. https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/ageing/WorldPopulationAgeing2019-Report.pdf
    Van Deursen, A. J., & Helsper, E. J. (2015). A nuanced understanding of Internet use and non-use among the elderly. European journal of communication, 30(2), 171-187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323115578059
    Van Deursen, A. J., & Helsper, E. J. (2015). The third-level digital divide: Who benefits most from being online?. In Communication and information technologies annual (pp. 29-52). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2050-206020150000010002
    Van Deursen, A. J., & Van Dijk, J. A. (2019). The first-level digital divide shifts from inequalities in physical access to inequalities in material access. New media & society, 21(2), 354-375. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818797082
    Van Dijk, J. (2020). The digital divide. John Wiley & Sons.
    Vigo, M., & Brajnik, G. (2011). Automatic web accessibility metrics: Where we are and where we can go. Interacting with computers, 23(2), 137-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2011.01.001
    Williamson, K., Wright, S., Schauder, D., & Bow, A. (2001). The Internet for the blind and visually impaired. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 7(1), JCMC712. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2001.tb00135.x
    Wei, K. K., Teo, H. H., Chan, H. C., & Tan, B. C. (2011). Conceptualizing and testing a social cognitive model of the digital divide. Information Systems Research, 22(1), 170-187. doi:10.1287/isre.1090.0273
    Wang, R., Chen, Z., Zhou, Y., Shen, L., Zhang, Z., & Wu, X. (2019). Melancholy or mahjong? Diversity, frequency, type, and rural-urban divide of social participation and depression in middle-and old-aged Chinese: A fixed-effects analysis. Social science & medicine, 238, 112518. DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112518
    Xie, B. (2007). Older Chinese, the Internet, and well-being. Care Management Journals, 8(1), 33-38. doi: 10.1891/152109807780494122
    Xie, B. (2006). Growing older in the Information Age: Civic engagement, social relationships, and well-being among older Internet users in China and the United States. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
    Yamashita, T., Narine, D., Chidebe, R., Cummins, P., Kramer, J., & Karam, R. (2023). DIGITAL SKILLS, STEM OCCUPATION, AND JOB AUTOMATION RISK AMONG THE OLDER WORKERS IN THE US. Innovation in Aging, 7(Supplement_1), 663-664. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igad104.2158.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE